Behind the Russia-Saudi Breakup, Calculations and Miscalculations

Mar 10, 2020 · 42 comments
GoLakers (California)
This shows a complete failure to understand capitalism. Lowering prices of oil will strain some higher-cost frackers. If the length of time is too long to be sustainable for some companies, they will certainly fold. But the oil and gas in the United States is not going away, and when the price is sufficient to make a profit again, capitalism will provide the opportunity for more companies to form, and start where the others left off.
John Sullivan (Sloughhouse , CA)
This Putin/SAudi thing seem like a double suicide. Sure the Saudi's can go lower than anyone. But their timing may just send the world into a deep recession. Everyone will be asking if it is /was worth it.
ss (Boston)
'...nationalist-minded Russian economists intent on punishing the United States, no matter what the cost to Russia.' And it seems that that is exactly what the medieval kingdom is doing as well, hardly unintentionally. And that is why our government has to react. A king (!) somewhere decided to decimate an important industry in USA and this should almost be taken as an assault to our national integrity which is why the government must not leave it as a business tempest, since it is not. This does not excuse the obvious idiocy of the shalers who need to pay price for their ridiculous business but they must not be wiped out, which is the writing on the wall right now.
Harry Sullivan (Bellevue, WA)
"Trade Wars Are Good", until they aren't!
Eugene (Santa Cruz, CA)
The writers should have included what the Ruble was trading at to the Dollar just before the price war and what the ruble was trading at in todays story.
John (Chicago)
Reading this story I’m reminded of the joke about the Russian peasant who finds a magic lamp in the mud while digging for beats and when told by the Jeannie that is granted one wish for whatever he wants thinks about is for a minute and says, I want my neighbor’s cow to die.
Chuck (CA)
The Saudi's need to be cautious here.. lest they become a top target of Russian disinformation and intelligence operations.
William O’Reilly (Manhattan)
Doesn’t matter with no elections and state media
wise brain (Martinez)
In the middle of a global public health pandemic which is shaking the economy, Russia and the Saudis chose to pick a fight resulting in further economic losses. Because Trump, belittles competence and diplomacy, there is no American leadership to help mediate and America suffers. Had enough? NO MATTER WHO, VOTE BLUE
S Butler (New Mexico)
Have Vladimir Putin and Mohammed bin Salman really fallen out of love? Could this be a strategy they've concocted in secret to corner the world's oil markets? Wouldn't Putin seek to reduce Saudi Arabia's oil production capabilities if the break-up were real? Wouldn't Putin go so far as to attack and destroy some or all of Saudi Arabia's oil production capabilities if this break-up were real? Either Saudi Arabia is going to be attacked or the break-up is a ruse to corner the world's oil market. I would guess the latter.
MH (South Jersey, USA)
Think about this: Suppose it’s just a fake fight and what’s really happening is a prelude to causing a collapse in the US oil industry and, perhaps our entire economy. The entire oil industry has become highly leveraged and crashing prices will jeopardize not only the companies themselves but their lenders as well. The fracking industry needs $50/barrel to be profitable. Oil is in the low $30s range nowadays and if the Saudis and Russians can keep it that way for, let’s say, even six months or a year, it could trigger a devastating financial crisis. Of course, the current administration has scoffed at supporting renewable energy so we are that much behind in countering an oil squeeze like the one that’s happening. Not to mention Trump being particularly under the influence of the Saudi and Russian culprits and probably unable or unwilling to get them to back off.
Ron B (Vancouver Canada)
@MH US oil production will not "collapse". It will however be trimmed back from the present 13,000 BBL/day level (EIA Government Stats) to something considerably less as a result of high production cost shale oil reduction. In late 2016 the daily volume was about 8500 BBL/day.
Slann (CA)
SA holds all the cards here, and Sechin and putin, crooks to the bone, have profited personally from controlling all russian oil companies. The well-deserved sanctions we placed on russian oil companies thwarted their plans to reap huge rewards from the lengthening Arctic drilling season, which also requires deals with Western oil companies (for technology), also denied by the sanctions. russian oil is much more expensive to extract than SA oil, and, as the entire russian economy (and the crooks who personally profit, i.e., putin and Sechin) are suffering now as never before. There is something unsaid in this new rift. Could the Saudis be responding to some American "stimulus"? Unclear. Is it personal, between Mo Bone Saw and putin? Also unclear. But if this situation was engineered to cause maximum damage to russia's economy, in the midst of the Covid-19 market disruptions, it could not have been better timed. As for our shale-oil extraction, the price crash does indeed make the process unprofitable, however the steep drop in demand, while hopefully temporary, softens the blow a bit.
Blaise Descartes (Seattle)
Sadly, Tariff Man is missing in action when it comes to the Arabia-Russia price war. President Trump was happy to levy tariffs on China. Why? Because it gratified his ego. He could go into meetings with Xi Jinping with a useful weapon. He doesn't like Xi's tie? He can raise tariffs tomorrow. He doesn't like Xi's joke? He imposes another unexpected tariff. Does this produce a better result than holding tariffs as a potential threat if good faith negotiations break down? I think not. But Trump likes to bully everyone and it fits his style. Now we have a price war on oil between Russian and Arabia. Who gets hurt? Well Europe and the US are already reeling from Covid-19. What the US doesn't need is yet another source of market uncertainty. Now we have a case in which collective action of the US, Britain, France, Italy and a few other countries makes sense. They could exact tariffs on Arabian and Russian oil to keep prices stable until the price war ends. Consumers in Europe and the US would suffer higher but stable oil prices in the short term. But it would also mean that oil companies like XOM, CVX, BP and RDS could avoid layoffs in the short term. In other words, a lessening of pain in an already stressed economic environment. But Trump has scuttled his relations with European leaders. So when tariffs might make sense, they are not discussed. The US had better options back in the days when the slogan was not "American First."
Chuck (CA)
@Blaise Descartes Trump actually wants cheap oil on the open market as he believes it improves the US economy. And Trump does not own oil companies, nor probably any shares in oil companies.. so he could care less about the US oil industry... until Americans get into an uproar and when did Americans ever get into an uproar about lower gas prices???
Chris (Yonkers, N.Y.)
Mr. Kramer., Thank you for this clear and thorough discussion. The irony of our president's supposed allies sticking it to American oil companies is an example of how little diplomatic clout the USA has today. I wonder if things would have played out differently with Rex Tillerson at the helm. Probably not because our President only listens to himself. It really puts Mr. Trump between a rock and a hard p[lace. How can he introduce policies to increase the cost of oil to Americans during an election year. I doubt that would be a well received platform. On the other hand how does he win an election without winning the electoral vote rich State of Texas? On a different note I would really appreciate a similarly thoughtful article that helps explain the inter relationships and interests between Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the US and Iran regarding the mess in Syria.
fact or friction (maryland)
Saudi Arabia slashes oil prices every so often, to drive out of business oil producers in places like the US and elsewhere. Then, after those have all been driven out of business, the Saudis raise prices again. Eventually, with oil prices high enough, oil producers start coming back into operation again in the US and elsewhere. Then, the Saudis slash oil prices again, and the cycle repeats itself. It's a calculated move which helps the Saudis, across the long term, maximize their profits and keep the world as dependent as possible on their oil, for as long as possible. Yet another good reason why the US, Europe and the rest of the world should move away from oil to sustainable energy sources.
APS (Olympia WA)
"But shale oil and gas are expensive to produce, and Russia is now calculating that many companies cannot survive as prices fall below their break-even point." It doesn't matter if those companies fold and/or get bought out, the shale oil isn't going anywhere and if Saudi Arabia decides to close the tap and the price goes up again, somebody will be getting at that shale oil again.
Roget T (NYC)
The schism between the Saudis and Putin is just another reminder of the fragility of an oil-based economy. The faster that the US can convert its vehicles to electricity, the better.
Slann (CA)
@Roget T We should understand that fossil fuels are a temporary energy source, and we MUST be using this to our advantage by developing alternate energy sources (renewables, fusion, etc.) before we no longer have the "luxury" we seem to take for granted.
Chuck (CA)
@Roget T Most electric power generated in the US is from fossil fuels. The rapid move from gas to electric vehicles will actually most likely push power grid infrastructure over the cliff, and cost utility companies 10s of billions of dollars to address.. and those costs will be passed on to consumers. In the end, electric vehicle operation will be no cheaper in the US, nor any greener.
Steve Crouse (CT)
@Chuck Chuck, I'd like to know more, can you elaborate.
Ron B (Vancouver Canada)
The notion that the US will become a long term exporter of oil is a fallacy. The shale based reserves that has lead to a spike in US production is unsustainable because 1) The drilling, completion and fraccing costs are unusually high when amortized over the well production life. 2)The steep decline rates associated with production from these "tight" formations essentially require that two new wells be drilled for every increase in production from one well which is clearly unsustainable. 3) Capital inflows to this tight shale gig is quickly evaporating as debt levels spiral up.
Chuck (CA)
@Ron B It all depends on the price of oil Ron. Right now, in an oil price war, what you say is true. But oil price wars and supply adjustments are part and parcel for the world. FACT: both the Saudi's and the Russians need oil prices well above $50 a barrel to make money, so this spat between them can and will end. Russia, more in need of hard currency that is brought in by oil exports will probably blink first here, not OPEC.
Danny (Bx)
As the US becomes an exporter of growing importance to world markets including China and Japan would it not be of amazing irony if American oil executives began back door negotiations with OPEC. If NATO could put a plug on Russian oil and gas imports while buying California Teslas the Ukrainians would gladly investigate the entire DNC. Fire up those reactors Germany!
Ron B (Vancouver Canada)
@Danny The "growing importance" of US production will last like a snowman in July.
Harry Eagar (Sykesville, Maryland)
Somebody in Russia does not understand market economics. It costs the original developer around $50/bbl to get shale oil in the US, but once that developer goes bankrupt and some bottomfeeder buys the assets, owner No. 2 can pump and make money at, say, $20/bbl -- as cheap as Saudi Arabia. So, no, US shale production will not drop as a result of Russia and Saudi Arabia torpedoing prices. (It will drop, slowly, because new development is stalling out as oil moved below $60.)
Ron B (Vancouver Canada)
@Harry Eagar You're making the assumption that Russia's lifting costs for their conventional production matches the cost of US shale oil production. That couldn't be further from the truth especially when you factor in the complete lack of environmental constraints on Russian production.
Harry Eagar (Sykesville, Maryland)
@Ron B Whether US shale producers produce has nothing to do with Russia's costs. Oil is not fungible; refineries cannot easily switch among suppliers. And, my point is that US shale production costs are sunk (for current production). Russia cannot undersell us because we will simply ruin the current owners and replace them with new owners. The shale wells will not close down.
CC210 (Brewster, MA)
@Harry Eagar Yes, people and companies (select US banks) that chose to invest in high-cost fracking drilling will take a hit, and in some cases a very big hit, from low oil prices. But, in an economy as large and diverse as the US, and with a banking system with mostly very solid balance sheets (today, as opposed to 2007), the US can restructure the finances of the our oil industry and lower the average well-head production cost to a level competitive with Russia's production cost. But, more important - the critical importance of oil will decline when we see deployment of small modular nuclear reactors starting in 5-7 years (. They will be very cost-efficient, and super-safe. Yes, they will generate nuclear waste, but development and deployment of molten salt reactors will likely follow, and they burn nuclear waste, rendering it with a hazard life of 300 years, a very manageable figure. And that's stop-gap, pending development of the holy grail of energy, fusion reactors. Bottom-line - oil is an industry with a short shelf life. A stop-gap industry with a limited future. Good luck, Russia and OPEC....
John Belniak (high falls, ny)
The lead picture alone is worth a couple of thousand words. Just glancing, I thought it was it was a cut from a new Austin Powers movie poster. Frightening villains, indeed.
Paul (Florida)
Make no mistake this is NOT a war between the Saudis and Russia. This is an orchestrated push to do what they were not able to do in 2014. The key ingredient is no demand and too much oil that can be sold profitably or even to cover costs. Additionally the US producers are heavily leveraged and could be forced out of business. Is it a coincidence that prior to this push the Saudi Royal Family members who had a long history with the USA had been rounded up and detained? Think about it. With the Saudis saying they are having a price war with Russia rather than saying they are trying to drive our producers out of business we wish them well and cheer them on. We're being sucker punched and don't even realize it. There is a tectonic shift occurring in the Middle East and Russia is becoming the dominant player at our expense. Autocratic rulers have a tendency of gravitating to each other. That is now happening in the Middle East and other parts of the world too. Sadly, this is not the first time in history this has happened.
Harry Eagar (Sykesville, Maryland)
@Paul US shale production is not nearly as important to overall US production to give that result. If a lot of little -- they are all little -- shale operators fail, Big Oil will et bigger on the cheap. Furthermore, oil is a very small part of the US economy, while it is huge in Russia and Saudi Arabia. No outsider can really hurt the US economy (unless China dumps its Treasuries)
Paul (Florida)
@Harry Eagar .You have to remember that the USA is the highest oil producer in the world. Perhaps you weren't around or were not aware of what the drop in oil prices in the mid 1980's did to the economies in Texas and other western states. I worked in NJ then and there were people who transferred up from Texas because the economy was so bad. They were not even in an industry that was directly tied to the oil industry. We can not be producing so much oil without a good deal of the economies being directly or indirectly tied to the oil industry no matter how much those states have tried to diversify. Be that as it may, and I do agree overall our national economy is diverse, the crux of what I was trying to say was that this is a stark example of how the US is loosing its influence and Russia, aka Putin, is gaining hegemony in that part of the world and I was also inferring that the same is true in other parts of the world too. It was a geopolitical issue I was referring to not the economy. I'm sorry I wasn't clearer
Ra Jr (Langley VA)
@Paul I think you have a good point here This makes the most sense to me after reading the comments and consideration on thoughts during my read of the article.
Conch Republican (Conch Republic)
It's too late to do anything about shale oil production, the base infrastructure has been in place and it's really about ramping up/down production, which can be done relatively quickly. The Russians are grasping at straws here.
Ronn (Seoul)
It is past time for America to adopt an energy policy that is focused upon renewable energy and takes America away from dependence upon such unscrupulous players as these two.
M (Kansas)
Very interesting.
Stephen Kosonocky (Fort Collins , CO)
It’s time for the United States to put a tariff on all foreign oil imports to penalize dumping by Russia and Saudi Arabia. The tariff should be at a level to ensure reasonable profitability of American shale producers.
J. Larimer (Bay Area, California)
@Stephen Kosonocky How about a tax incentive for renewable energy instead? Policy should look forward not backward to fix problems like this new one. In a renewable energy world, the price and profits earned from fossil fuels will look very different from the price and profits they can earn today. Now is the time for pro-action, not reaction.
Peter Bergoo (Marietta, Ga)
Good Idea to tax oil imports to a level where US domestic oil poducers can survive to continue production and maintain employment. A portion of funds from this tax can go to support renewable and energy efficiency programs. It all ties together.
Taz (NYC)
@Stephen Kosonocky I respectfully disagree. Let the free market be free. If shale drillers can't compete on price, they should cut back production.