Want Clarity on the Sanders-Biden Face-Off? North Carolina May Provide It

Mar 03, 2020 · 65 comments
Ukosi (Multiple)
The Main Rreason That Democratic Party Lost to Trump in 2016 was because They Were Not Fighting For Something, but They Were Fighting To Stop Something (Fascism and Racism) or Somebody (Trump). It seems like Democrats are trying to repeat the same mistakes this year; both in The Primary (Stop Sanders) and The General (Stop Trump). History shows that Voters Respond To A Campaign That Offers Something or Ideas than the one that's just against something or ideas or Somebody. Democrats must come up with a Clear Vision and Irresistible Brand. Like him or not,Trump has an irresistible Brand called " Make America Great Again". Instead of offering her own irresistible Brand,Hillary and the Obamas wasted their time and energy trying to prove that America is already great. As we now know,many voters didn't believe that America is already great. Among all the two dozens democratic candidates,it's only one that has a Brand which is "For All" in terms of Medicare For All,Public Colleges For All,Government Should Work For All,Housing For All,This Country For All and not for the few wealthy people,and he also has a Motto which is " Not me,Us". Can anyone tell me the Brand or even the Motto of any other democratic presidential candidate besides "Defeat Trump" and "I'm The Most Electable" ? While defeating Trump might be the number one goal of tribal Democrats,it might not be the number one goal of Independent and Swing Voters who actually decide the outcome of any presidential election.
Jacob Alexander (Washington, DC)
@Ukosi The 2016 Democratic ticket won the popular vote by a 3 million person surplus. I sincerely doubt their 2016 platform failed to resonate with voters. Comey announcing an investigation into Hilary Clinton while keeping mum about the investigation into Trump, Russian interference on behalf of Trump, or Sandernistas voting third party each tipped crucial swing votes though.
TheniD (Phoenix)
Always vote with your best interest in mind. Those sitting on the fence just take the quiz (there are several) which show which of the candidates you agree with on substance and then just vote for the one which most resembles your thoughts and ideas. That is what I did. We the voter cannot predict who will beat Trump. It is too far down the road. BTW, don't be Never (enter the name here)! That is ridiculous. You have vote in the final Nov ballot and again do the same analysis for yourself and vote. Voting for your best interest, is the only way to go.
Marshall Doris (Concord, CA)
Bernie, admittedly, does have a measure of political genius. The problem is that it is only a measure, and it relies on ideas more than it does on personal warmth and smooth charm like most charismatic politicians. It has worked well in bucolic Vermont, a small state where quirkiness is embraced more readily, but it has faltered on the larger stage of a national race. To make it worse, he’s all-in on the socialist label for himself, even though he isn’t really a hard core socialist who wants the government to take over the means of production. He seems to use that term as a shorthand nod to the social democracies of Europe, and apparently is only referencing his signature policies: Medicare for all and free college. Sure he gives token attention to the idea of leveling income inequality, but that’s not where he hangs his hat. It is easy for his staff to whine about the “establishment,” which resonates for those on the far left who nurse a Don Quixote sort of desire to tilt at windmills. My take, however, is that the Bernie campaign mostly did not do math very well. The hard reality is that most of the electorate is ideologically comfortable in the center, and that is where the votes are. Bernie’s “socialist” rhetoric frankly scares these voters, and scares them badly, I think. We just aren’t ready for a revolution, no matter how intensely the Bro’s feel about Bernie. Things are not that bad for most voters, and scaring the public isn’t a winning tactic right now.
drg3750 (Asheville, NC)
Bloomberg signs everywhere here. Not one Biden sign anywhere. Early voting is the norm. Bernie very strong here among younger voters. I voted for Pete but I know many like Mike. Biden does not excite anyone. That's a big problem. My feeling is that his SC bounce will be smaller than expected.
Subway Alum (North Carolina)
@drg3750 -- Interesting . . We live 35 miles from Asheville in much more conservative Transylvania County and seldom get past the Arden-Fletcher-South Asheville fringes. Here, there are virtually no signs for any presidential candidates (even Trump!). But the few Democratic signs I've seen are for Bloomberg; he must have more of an organization in Asheville that's filtered this way. My wife and I are among those who waited for the South Carolina result and election day. We had both favored other candidates (neither still left)) until Biden's victory there and consequently we both voted for him today. Not sure Biden excites us either, but if anybody can beat Trump,we think it's him, not Bloomberg. To us, our democracy hangs in the balance.
vineyridge (Mississippi)
We need to get rid of early voting and make all elections holidays. Could a president do this and include all the states by executive order?
Luis Arraez (Minneapolis)
@vineyridge The Constitution gives states the right to manage their own election. A federal law barring early voting would be unconstitutional; an executive order doing so would 100% be constitutionally unjustifiable. As for the federal holiday, I know Congress can pass a law making Election Day a federal holiday but I’m not sure if the president can do so via executive order.
J K Sanz (NC)
Sure it could be a holiday but American businesses will never let a day pass when they could make a buck. So it won’t be a holiday for service workers at your gas stations, restaurants and stores. Early voting allows people who work irregular schedules a chance to cast their vote.
fact or friction (maryland)
What about all the people who early voted for today's primaries? If they cast a ballot for a candidate who dropped out in the last few days (ahem, Buttigieg and Klobuchar), their votes are essentially wasted. And, don't presume a signficant majority of those folks would have voted for Biden instead. Polling/preference data suggests otherwise.
Lynne Shapiro (California)
@fact or friction Yes, I voted early too for Klobuchar. If I voted today I would have voted for Warren not Biden. But on the bright side how the knocked out candidates do with early Super Tuesday voters may bring some clarity to the vice presidential choice. And if the before Super Tuesday knocked out candidates do better than expected, it might give the Democratic Party leaders some wisdom to start the primary season with some of the Super Tuesday states that matter in with the Electoral College or not knock anyone out until Super Tuesday ballots are counted.
Is (Albany)
So much for “every vote counts” Senator Klobuchar didn’t even wait for her own state to vote before she dropped out so we can interpret that to mean she couldn’t win her own constituency.
M (Earth)
@Lynne Shapiro That’s why I held onto my ballot until yesterday afternoon. Personally I hope we move to ranked choice voting, which would solve both the wasted early vote problem and concern about backing non viable candidates problem.
Cousy (New England)
My North Carolina extended family, pragmatic to their core, voted for Biden. Bernie would do well to listen to the good people of that state. Obama won the first time in no small part because of North Carolina. So far, Bernie has been tone deaf to folks like my cousins, and it shows. Nationally, Bernie has a hard ceiling of support because of his dismissal of the core constituencies of North Carolina: Black people, suburban women, highly educated folks and moderates.
MarcosDean (NHT)
The reason why moderates in the Democratic Party hesitate to get behind Bernie is because for many of us, he and especially his most fervent supporters remind us in many ways of Trump. Both want to "blow up" the status quo. With Trump it's the "deep state." With Bernie it's the "establishment" -- same thing. Both are angry, old white men who won't ever compromise. It's their way or the highway. Both surround themselves with loyal acolytes who have promised fealty to their great leader. No critical thinking invited or allowed. Both are, at heart, autocrats who believe "only I can do it." Neither has any interest in reaching out to build a larger coalition. And neither has had any great measure of success in the past. Trump's businesses went bankrupt at least six times. Bernie hasn't been the primary sponsor of a single Senate bill in his 29 years in office.
Corrie (Alabama)
@MarcosDean so well said. That’s why Bernie isn’t my first choice. It feels like we have two fringe groups that haven’t taken a Civics course and don’t know the rules of civil discourse, and I just don’t think our country can handle anymore of this without completely breaking. We need to return to the center.
Chris (Connecticut)
@MarcosDean Thank you for writing this. It encapsulates a lot of issues I have with Sanders. I continue to ask where the leadership has been. My friends and family are tired of hearing me ask this, but where has he been for the past 3.5 years? Where was the leadership? Where has his voice been? It really hasn't been a great time to be a wallflower if you think you're really fit to be elected president.
Allen (Santa Rosa)
@MarcosDean After your first statement, your argument falls apart. Sure, Sanders wants to blow up the establishment, that's no secret, but the rest is hardly true. Doesn't ever compromise? The only thing Bernie does not compromise on is his morals. He's worked across the aisle hundreds of times over his 40 year history to get things like more healthcare through. Bernie understands full well that incremental progress is still progress. Yeah, we all know about the Bernie Bros. but I don't know of anyone or any instance who has shown incredibly loyalty to him. Even "the squad" ladies (AOC, Omar, etc.) don't show blind loyalty to Sanders the same way Trump supporters do, just run of the mill support and endorsement of his policies. Bernie is hardly an autocrat. If you're thinking of what he said about Cuba, then note that Obama said the same thing. Bernie is advocating for more democracy by making it easier to vote, not harder. How is that autocratic as opposed to the GOP, who are constantly engaging in voter suppression? Bernie never even IMPLIED that "only I can do it". He's all about bringing more people into politics and getting money out. Did you not see the 2018 midterms? Progressives AND moderates both made serious gains because Sanders encouraged them to get involved, irrespective of their ideals compared to his. "No great measures..." Buddy, get back to Google. Read up all the amendments Bernie has passed in his time in Congress. Success isn't always flashy.
Angelus Ravenscroft (Los Angeles)
What’s extremely distressing is the clear strategizing against a candidate. Is this about democracy? Sure doesn’t seem like it. Why not let the, you know, actual voters decide this.
Jacob Alexander (Washington, DC)
@Angelus Ravenscroft If Bernie Sanders wants to run as a socialist, he should start a Socialist Party of America and stop trying to hi-jack the Democratic Party — a party he has not professionally identified with for a generation. He’s a like clueless uncle promising to take the kids to Disneyworld at bed time and forcing the parents to burst the bubble.
Lawren (San Diego)
@Jacob Alexander, I would be very happy to register as a socialist and vote for Bernie. The Dems should be careful about what they wish for. Splitting their base is not a winning solution. If you don't support Sanders then don't vote for him but be careful how you treat his supporters because the younger generations will gladly put their energy into something that they think will work for them.
DRTmunich (Long Island)
@Jacob Alexander What about Bloomberg then? Or even Trump who was a democrat then he wasn't? Sanders is not a socialist. He is a Democratic socialist. This means something very different. He would be mainstream in Europe. With Bernie one knows what they get. Someone who has consistently advocated for peoples well being. Not Corporate well being. As his motto says "Not me, us." The hysteria over sanders from the "establishment" is nauseating and false. He is no Trump, who is a greedy narcissist. The problem is the rich and well off "establishment" don't want to share.
Rick (New York, NY)
I’ve been a Warren supporter since before she announced her candidacy and will vote for her if she’s on the NY ballot next month. If she’s not, I will gladly vote for Sanders. I can live with Biden as the nominee. (The same would not be true with Bloomberg, but his balloon has lost a lot of helium, so that likely makes it a moot point.) What the Democratic Party needs above all else is for a candidate to catch fire this month and next month, to the point of ending the primary season in June with an outright majority of delegates. A contested convention, regardless of the winner, would likely be fatal to the nominee’s chances of defeating President Trump. The deal-making that would be required to decide a contested convention would likely alienate enough voters to swing the key battleground states, whether or not Sanders ends up as the nominee (and I’m realistic enough to admit that he probably won’t be). I take no pleasure in saying that and hope it doesn’t happen, but we have to be realistic about this. Disapproval of President Trump will not be enough by itself; a nominee with a unified party behind him (and it does appear likely to be a “him”) is essential. A contested convention pretty much guarantees that unity will be lacking afterwards. One of the candidates needs to go on a long winning streak after today.
Andy (Salt Lake City, Utah)
North Carolina is more interesting if you're evaluating a straight Sanders-to-Biden matchup. However, I still think Texas is the race to watch today. North Carolina is a semi-closed primary. Texas is open. The population should favor either Biden or Bloomberg. And yet, Sanders is expected to win. We're going to measure the Bloomberg spoiler amount. As an added bonus, we'll get a good estimate on changing demographics. How much does Sanders win by? How much of the vote does Bloomberg steal? Which demographics fit into which lanes? Those are the questions we're asking today.
Kathleen Breen (San Francisco)
Today you are voting to recruit or dismiss an army of one million extremely motivated volunteers who are ready to work their tails off for Bernie Sanders to defeat Trump in the General Election. I'd like to think they'd do it regardless of the nominee, but the fact is, the vast majority won't.
M. Heintz (New York, New York)
Agreed. No matter what you believe about Bernie supporters, they are the most dedicated, loyal, and multitudinous group of volunteers in this current cycle.
Carl Lee (Minnetonka, MN)
I disagree. North Carolina could go Biden in this primary, but like South Carolina it is a hollow victory. Trump will take those states. With the youth vote the Dems could cinch the election, but Biden is not getting that vote. Both Biden and Bernie are easy targets for Trump in the election, given their baggage. Biden and Bernie are also bleached dinosaurs, old white men. America needs energy--someone who can will mop the floor with Trump. I think that is Warren. She'll put his weave to good use. Honestly, the only reason Biden is getting support from this paper is Wall Street, and it is the reason Warren isn't. It's not about the people or the country, it's about the monied.
Corrie (Alabama)
@Carl Lee Trump will not take North Carolina. If Biden nominates Stacey Abrams, Trump won’t even takeGeorgia. I am willing to bet the whole farm on that... and the back 40 too. It blows my mind how many sanders supporters discount the value of the African American vote.
Previs (portland or)
Joe and Pete are likable, Trump and Pence are not. Biden/Buttigieg + electoral college =victory.
Tom osterman (Cincinnati zOhio)
Biden, Sanders, Bloomberg, Warren.  What's the point?  Look at 2016 when all the "experts" and most of the polls pointed to a Hillary victory.  There are no experts in  politics because you're not dealing with reality.  You are dealing with showmanship.   Trump won because he  appealed to the "underworld" in all of us.  For goodness sake the Evangelicals have given him one "mulliigan after another."All this talk about Sanders beating Trump.  All this  talk about Biden and the moderates...ergo the Democratic establishment.  What really is the Democratic establishment anyway? There are many people out there who actually think this president is the greatest president.  If that historically becomes true, the U.S. might as well cash in its chips because this won't be a country any more but just a massive amount of chaos. There is only one corrective on the horizon in 2020.  It is this:  If the millennial generation for one day sets aside all of its lofty goals and shows up at the polls (at least 70 to 80 percent of them) and vote against the current president, then and only then will we get past this period of infantile delusion.
Doug (Los Angeles)
"Mr. Biden had disappointed many Democrats with his uneven debate performances" ??? Bloomberg is the one who has had uneven performances. The first hour of his first debate, in particular, was terrible.
Jeff M (Santa Barbara)
The problem with Biden is that the entire argument for him is that he can beat Trump. But can you imagine him in a debate with Trump? That would be like Little Red Riding Hood against the Wolf.
Bunnybear (Lowell, MA)
@Jeff M Who is the wolf on your simile? Trump will.not debate. If he does he will rant 3 word slogans and not be able to answer a single question . He might make fun of Biden's stutter. You will vote for trump because you will think he is a great debater. Trump will lose and start a network. 90% of the material will be his great debate win over president Biden
Lauren (NC)
@Jeff M Debates don't matter in a general. Does anyone think Clinton lost to him in even one debate? Does anyone think that people really swing on the words that get said on those stages? They swing on the 1000's of moments in between. This general will be decided on Twitter - specifically Trump's account. If he is his most obnoxious, divisive and hateful we win. If he keeps it in check - it is more up for grabs.
Alan (Columbus OH)
@Jeff M If people cared about the general election debates, wouldn't Clinton have won? Everyone knows Joe somewhat. Everyone knows Trump too much. No one is likely to care about debates if they even happen.
DRTmunich (Long Island)
Biden as others point out is a gaffe machine, has no new policies to speak of, and will have Hunter Biden and Ukraine hung around his neck. It doesn't matter if it is fair or not. The Republican dirty PAC machine is all warmed up to spew hateful, fearful nonsense at the voters. Biden will lose to Trump. Voters will give up on the hope of change.
dba (nyc)
@DRTmunich a The same Republican dirty PACs will turn Sanders into a socialist who will confiscate your health care, guns, and money to give to illegals and turn America into Cuba and Venezuela. If Mayor Pete were straight and married to a woman, he would be winning the nomination.
Link Wray's Busted Speaker (Virginia)
@dba True. And true.
Scientist (CA)
Sanders vs Biden - and the winner is: Warren!
Doug (Los Angeles)
@Scientist That would be a surprise as she has done poorly in the first four states
Doug (Los Angeles)
@Scientist That would be a surprise as she has done poorly in the first four states 3rd, 4th, 4th and 5th
JW (California)
Why — all of a sudden — do the Carolinas speak for the Democratic Party and the nation as whole? As a California resident (the 5th largest economy in the world) I’m putting my money and faith on the home state choice.
Link Wray's Busted Speaker (Virginia)
I just voted Biden here in Virginia. My sister down in suburban North Carolina, one of a demographic that voted Trump in 2016 and many of whom came to regret it, just voted Biden down there. Her Republican hardcore Trumpist husband, though, in the North Carolina DEMOCRATIC Party primary, voted anyway, for Bernie Sanders. Which almost surely means my young rightwing nephews, here in Virginia and California, are doing the same thing today. I don't listen to Rush ever, but I'm sure he and other of his ilk have called on Trumpists to do this nationwide in every state they're not barred from voting in their much-hated opposition's primary. Trumpists are trying to force, to carry, Sanders to the Democratic Party's 2020 nomination in every primary they can. Certain as they are that that is the pathway to their hero, their Dear Leader, running America for 4 more years. So, of course, are the Russians... again... over Facebook news feeds and shares/forwards/recommends/likes, Insta, Twitter, etc. Wreaking the havoc again that worked so unexpectedly well in 2016, only bigger, better, and they hope, less detectable this time. Sanders supporters spend tremendous energy crying "foul" against Democrats. Funny how we don't hear complaints from them about these large, probably pivotal in places, outside interventions inflating the vote for nefarious reasons in their candidate's favor.
Michael (Riverside, CA)
So the the moderate establishment is doing everything it can to stop Sanders again. Anti-Sanders folks keep blaming Trump’s election on Sanders. Bernie Sanders did not lose to Trump. Hillary Clinton did. Post Obama, the moderate Democratic message has been “No we can’t” on everything from climate change to healthcare. That is why Biden or other moderate won’t defeat Trump. The “No we can’t” status quo does not inspire voter turnout. Sanders bold policies that benefit 90 plus percent of Americans does.
Corrie (Alabama)
@Michael when you make comments like this, what I hear is, “I don’t care about the will of black voters who overwhelmingly support Biden.” And when I hear something like that, I feel like I’m dealing with a Trump supporter. Please consider how alienating this rhetoric is.
Todd (San Fran)
@Michael "So the the moderate establishment is doing everything it can to stop Sanders again." Or, and stay with me here, Democrats want to vote for a democrat. All of this talk about "the establishment" is a red herring. The Democratic "establishment" are DEMOCRATS, and many of us don't agree with an Elderly Heart-Attack Summer-Home Socialist who isn't a democrat and will likely renounce his party affiliation the night after he wins the election and then spend his entire administration fighting with BOTH parties. Bernie can't win the general, but if he did, it might in some way be worse than if he lost, because he will likely be an even less effective Jimmy Carter. Bernie is the pied-piper of low-information voters and young people without skin in the game. If he wins the nom, it will result in an all-time epic defeat. Ask yourself: why is Bernie the preferred candidate of Trump and Russia? Because they know they can easily defeat an "elderly angry pro-gun jewish atheist socialist millionaire" with infinite heretofore unseen videos praising communist Russia who's never achieved anything during his time in Washington and can't get along with literally anyone. Bernie is our doom.
Michael (Riverside, CA)
@Corrie I absolutely care about the will of black voters including my black husband and the rest of our black family (who happen to be Sanders supporters, BTW). But I care about the will of all voters. But the Democratic establishment and moderates don’t and they are proving it again, I am a Sanders supporter. Yes, I voted for him in the last primary. I voted for Clinton in the general. This time, I voted for Sanders in the primary and, if Biden is the nominee, he will have my vote in the general. I fear that he will not win against Trump because he is pushing for the status quo.
Bill (New York City)
Wake up, Dems! Biden winning meaningless Southern states that will have zero impact on the general election in November is far, far different than Bernie winning all the important states that will be in play. Sanders is way up in the polls for Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania - not just in the primaries against Biden, but in the general against Trump as well. And that's what matters! Please take a look at the Electoral College. Hillary ignored the Midwest and barely won Minnesota, while barely losing Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Bernie won't make that mistake, and if he takes back those three traditionally reliable Blue states it doesn't matter what happens in Arizona, North Carolina, Florida or even Texas - Bernie will win the election! Frightened centrist and establishment Dems need to take a deep breath, calm down, and understand that Bernie's path to victory is clear and attainable, as long as the Dem party bosses don't do what they did in 2016 and work behind the scenes to undermine Bernie. It worked in 2016 but it will tear the party apart in 2020 and guarantee Trump four more years. The Dem Party needs to stop trying to protect the establishment gravy train and finally agree that healthcare should be a privilege (like in all civilized nations) and not a right! Feel the Bern, folks, cause it's coming and we're all going to be better for it...
Steven Levy (Jersey City, NJ)
@Bill You may want to rephrase (correct) your statement regarding healthcare, as it doesn’t make sense as written.
Clairvaux (NC)
@Bill “Feel the Bern....because it’s coming.” Does not exactly smack of the inclusivity Sanders supposedly espouses.
Corrie (Alabama)
I will support whomever the Democratic nominee ends up being, but this morning I proudly cast my first ever vote in a Democratic Presidential Primary, and I proudly cast it for Joe Biden. I believe he is the one who can heal the nation and bring people together. Bernie’s supporters in many ways remind me of Trumpians and that’s made me feel scared to jump on his bandwagon. Joe represents a return to decency and civility, and that’s what I think we need. However, I will certainly vote for Bernie if he’s the nominee. In the beginning, I was all in for Pete, and I’ll still be all in for him in the future. He has started something inspiring among people like me — I am a 38-year-old member of the Oregon Trail Generation (which just means we understand both analog and digital and our Boomer bosses and parents therefore make us fix/explain/install/handle anything technology related). I’m also a college-educated white woman from a conservative Christian upbringing. For me, Pete embodies the values I was taught, and I think many Southerners in North Carolina feel similarly about Pete. Even though nobody cares about my Democratic vote in Alabama because our elections are still determined by a slavery-era electoral college, it’s extremely important to me because it represents my personal reckoning as a white Southern woman who was basically programmed from birth to vote Republican. And the good news is that I’m not the only white Southern woman of my generation experiencing one.
Lauren (NC)
@Corrie 34 in NC and couldn't agree more with everything you said. I LOVED Pete, but I am really happy to vote for Biden today. I have always been a Democrat, though, and grew up respecting Biden. Maybe it's because I always felt like Biden would stop over and talk to us here in the Appalachians even if it wasn't an election year; like he wasn't the kind of politician who would judge and try to 'fix' us. I am excited to vote for his decency and empathy, that always seems rooted in respect.
Corrie (Alabama)
@Lauren I love to hear that you grew up in a Democratic home in the Appalachians. In Alabama, Democrats and Republicans are typically torn along racial lines. Being a Southern Baptist deacon’s daughter meant that I was the reddest of the blood red Republicans because the Southern Baptist church is essentially the de facto state religion of Alabama. It’s crazy how entwined our religion and politics are... So many remnants of Jim Crow still exist and I’m so ready for them to fade away. Anyway, I am proud to join you in supporting Biden.
Lynne Shapiro (California)
Elizabeth Warren will surprise us all when all the votes are counted by the end of the week (in California mail in ballots had to only be postmarked by today). Those who were going to vote for Mayor Pete or Senator Klobuchar today will most likely vote for her. it will also be interesting to see how Mayor Pete and Senator Klobuchar tallied up among the many early voters like me. I hope the Democrats as unwise as they are to knock out any candidates based on four states not important in the Electoral College --with one accepting Republican votes as well--will be wise to choose a viable vice president from how he/she does today among early voters.
T (NC)
@Lynne Shapiro North Carolina is important in the Electoral College because it's a swing state. California is unimportant because it's a foregone conclusion that it will go for the Democratic nominee, whoever that turns out to be. Racking up more of the popular vote in California won't change the outcome of the election, but in North Carolina it could be a deciding factor.
Doug (Los Angeles)
@Lynne Shapiro so far Warren has placed, 3rd, 4th, 4th and 5th
Scientist (CA)
@Lynne Shapiro I think you're right - lots of Buttigieg and Klobuchar voters will go for Warren, joining her already substantial support. And the race is on!
Moen (OfEarthOne)
"Democrats said they were unusually conflicted and unsure who would be most likely to defeat President Trump" Because Trump is on both sides of the fence and getting away with it. To succeed Democrats need to draw SHARP contrast that exceeds Trump in aggression and hammers home common man issues and solutions that Trump reneged on record. Me-too Biden has been around for 40 years, man without a cause, and his most easily discernible identifier is that he a gaffer who gets lost in his delivery to say nothing about his exposure to Ukraine that would render Trump campaign replay of the Clinton hoaxes.
Todd (San Fran)
@Moen "and his most easily discernible identifier is that he a gaffer" No, I would say that his most easily discernible identifier is that he was Vice President under Obama for eight years, and did one of the best jobs of any Vice President ever.
Moen (OfEarthOne)
@Todd Thank you! What is most relevant here and now is not his past innocuous vice presidency but what and how Democrats can be relevant to the needs of the country. I don't care for demos or repos. They are two faces of the same coin at the extreme detriment of the Nation, they have not will likely not serve the voters. Unfortunately there is no likely hood that the interest of the largest unrepresented group, the independents will ever be served because the system is RIGGED by the elite while tools of or being part of the invisible. Trump is the outcome of that frustration. Biden is sure to give Trump the kitchen sink!
Frank Schuerman (Brooklyn)
So the thesis of this article is that if joe Biden wins this one state that he is expected to win, even if he loses all of the others, then it’s a sign that he has defeated sanders and should win the nomination? That is incredibly flimsy.
AH2 (NYC)
It's time to put Bloomberg out of OUR misery Super Tuesday with bad results for him everywhere.
Fromjersey (NJ)
Am still hoping Bloomberg will gain traction. I prefer him to all the candidates at this point, except Elizabeth Warren, who unfortunately, probably does not stand a chance.
northlander (michigan)
2016 rerun, same result.
Blunt (New York City)
Nope. Bernie is winning in California. Hillary win that in 2016. Over four hundred delegates :-)