Ireland’s Independence Centenaries Threaten to Reopen Old Wounds

Feb 05, 2020 · 71 comments
just a thought (New York)
On Veteran’s Day in the USA, we do not honor the Confederate soldiers of the Civil War or the loyalists from America’s War of Independence. The French do not honor the turncoats who served the Vichy government during WW2. Norway does not honor Quisling. Ireland should behave no differently.
Chris (SW PA)
The British were and are occupiers. They violently crushed decent and stole from the Irish. False equivalencies such as the Irish did some bad things sounds a bit like Trump. One nation was the violent occupier. I may visit Great Briton, and when I set foot on English soil I will plant a flag and claim the land for my King, King Flimflam, who lives in the sky and tells me the magic words. At that point I will own England and will have a divinely provided right to extract whatever I want from them, and if they don't obey I have a King God's permission to kill every one who disobeys.
misslawbore (London UK)
@Chris Brits are not “occupiers”. Explain
John (Usa)
Bloody Sunday was not in 1920
Cameo (San Antonio)
@John t'was in fact. 21 November 1920. There was a smaller one in 1913 with Jim Larkin's men (Larkin lived two doors down from my grandparents - see my earlier post for how devastating taking sides was/is) - but the 1920 Bloody Sunday is generally considered the Irish original one. Another one in Belfast in 1921, but you are thinking of the 1972 events in Derry.
David Lloyd-Jones (Toronto, Canada)
@John Of the recent Irish Bloody Sundays the first was in 1920. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Sunday_(1920) Imperialism tends to have a lot of bloody Sundays because that's the only day Workers have available to get shot.
Nora (The United States)
My maternal and paternal great grandparents all immigrants from Galway. Their land stolen, their children died from hunger, their good friends murdered. No celebration of repressive governments. Just is not okay to murder people for money.I’m grateful for their sacrifices, and I choose to celebrate them instead.
Dedalus (Toronto, ON)
More people were killed in the Irish Civil War (1922-23) than in the Irish War of Independence (1919-21). A lot of blood has been spilled in that beautiful land for Irish nationalism. Isn't it time to live and let live?
A Cynic (None of your business)
In any war of independence in human history, there have always been traitors. They usually end up getting what they deserve.
Harry Byrne (Merion Station, PA)
I keep a house in Co. Mayo. I believe it is difficult for Americans to understand the depth and pervasive nature of British rule on Irish thinking. All of my neighbors have relatives who were evicted or starved. All have siblings or children living in other countries. Even the very surroundings provoke thoughts of the bad days: to this day, abandoned houses, abandoned Catholic churches, mass graves, even entire abandoned villages are a common sight, all the result of eviction or starvation or disease.
IanC (Oregon)
I'm not a religious man, but as a sensitive human who has marveled at the ability for these people to live in peace since the Good Friday Agreement, I can't help but pray that they will find a peaceful way through this transition.
guy veritas (miami)
The Irish have unsettled business with the UK. Northern Ireland needs to be reunited. There is only one Ireland, Germany, Korea etc. Reparation payments are due Ireland for centuries of unspeakable abuse.
misslawbore (London UK)
@guy veritas Not at all. There will be a referendum on a United Ireland in NI and the decision will be the decision of the people of Northern Ireland, not commenters on the NY Times website. My prediction is it would be a close run thing if there was a referendum today but it would still be a vote to remain in the UK. And it would be a vote to stay out of the EU too
David (San Jose, CA)
You can see parallels with other countries-Israel for example. In putting down the various intifada uprisings of the Arabs against the Israelis the security forces with the toughest reputation among the Arabs were Druze members of the Israeli border police. The Druze are not mainstream Sunni or Shia Muslims but they are ethnic Arabs and they earned the reputation of being more brutal in putting down the intifada than the Israeli Jews. Ironically, across the border in Lebanon the Druze under Walid Jumblatt were some of the strongest opponents of Israeli incursions and attacks in Lebanon. Go Figure!
kate (dublin)
This is quite a superficial version of the story. The Irish Times repeatedly reported that the Black and Tans were not going to be honoured. Maurice Manning's thoughtful remarks on the subject are also not included here. He is the chair of the commission on Commemorations. Nor are historians like Mary Daly queried. Note, in fact, the all-male list of sources!
flyfysher (Longmont, CO)
People are complaining about what the Brits did to the Irish. Hey, the Brits compelled the Chinese to allow them to bring opium into China from India as well as forced many concessions, including losing its territorial sovereignty including Hong Kong. Pushing a drug trade as the official government policy. Great Britain was the first. Now that was something to complain about.
Bob Kavanagh (Boston)
The empire is dead and the UK is breaking up. Let's move on.
misslawbore (London UK)
@Bob Kavanagh Nice sentiment, thanks
Lefthalfbach (Philadelphia)
"...We are about to land at (Fill in the Blank) Airport in (Choose One) The Republic of Ireland/Northern Ireland. Please set your watches back to 1689..."
Olenska (New England)
@Lefthalfbach : While the U.S. is convulsed in controversy over states’ efforts to dismantle a woman’s right to choose, Ireland voted overwhelmingly several years ago to repeal the amendment to its Constitution barring abortion. Similarly, same-sex marriage was widely approved by Irish voters - described by James Joyce as a “priest-ridden race.” Listen to Michael D. Higgins’ speeches sometimes and contrast their humanity and sheer decency with the Twitter utterances of the current White House Occupant. Then decide which country more rightly is residing in the 17th c.
JOHN (PERTH AMBOY, NJ)
Moral equivalency is the only moral principle of the Left, including folks like Varadkar. Why stand up for your country which, until his advent, was too national, Catholic, pro-life, etc.?
john andrechak (idaho)
‘the men who dared the ‘Auxies’ and beat the Blacks&Tans were the Boys of Barr Na Staide who hunted for the Wren’
Red Allover (New York, NY)
It is interesting to read how the Irish should take a more "nuanced" view of the forces of the colonial power that robbed and raped and oppressed them for centuries . . . . Meanwhile, a play written by an Englishman, "The Ferryman," featuring every hoary, ignorant, anti-Irish cliche--from parents giving whiskey to toddlers, characters barely able to restrain themselves from bursting into rebel songs and (of course!) the sinister, IRA killer villain--was hailed as a masterpiece by all the critics in London and the equally ignorant, racist critics in New York. As an Englishman told Dedalus, "It seems history is to blame."
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Red Allover Did it play in Boston? I lived there and I don't think it would have done very well. I read the play and reviews and a pure piece of sterotype propaganda in the same way that the Brits are portrayed as believing in democracy and freedom. A joke they believe in anything that will put money in the elite and royals. Jim Trautman
misslawbore (London UK)
@trautman Extraordinary statement “they believe in anything that will put money in the elite and the royals”. Explain
john andrechak (idaho)
‘& when the hills were bleeding, & the rifles were aflame, to the rebel homes of Kerry the Saxon strangers came, & the men who dared the Auxies, and beat the Black&Tans were the boys of Barr Na Sraide, who hunted for the Wren’
Neel Kumar (Silicon Valley)
"The past is not dead. Actually, it's not even past" We need to realize that in war, all the poor schlubs like you and me are victims. Whether it is WW1 or WW2 or Vietnam or India or Congo or Ireland or Spain, the men and women who die and leave behind orphans, siblings, parents and spouses ARE victims (as are their kith and kin). We keep demonizing the "others" in hopes of showing ourselves in a good light when the reality is that every country, every society, every tribe is busy doing equally shitty things - "enhanced interrogation" is nothing but a veneer over torture, "rule of law" is bandied about when dealing with illegal immigrants but not when people in power rape children and it is easy to call people of other countries "barbarians" while forgetting that we have borrowed their foods, clothing, numbers, scientific methods, road building etc. Ireland can show the rest of the world that we can recognize the deaths of all people on all sides without belittling anyone.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Neel Kumar Does that mean the Germans can build monuments and honor the SS and Gestapo. Anyone who believes there was equal justice lives in a dream world. I lived in Alabama in the 60's there when the last lynching took place - gee the police never did arrest those who were responsible and if you think the white paid police force cared about crimes against blacks or those they believed were leftist commies you live in a dream world. When I lived there if I had a problem the police were the last ones I would ever go too. Jim Trautman
MB (SilverSpring, MD)
I was born in the US but had family in County Meath dating back into the mid-1700's, when Ireland was a colony. Prior to my only trip (October 2019) I read a few books, saw some YouTube history videos & "tried" to learn a bit of Gaelic. Never the less, I felt an evident undercurrent about a war the Irish won't forget & the English wish they could. It was, after all, only 100 years ago and, layered on the absolutely horrible things inflicted over 700+ years of occupation, I was astounded at the insensitity of the RIC ceremony. Choose a side, just like in the US Civil War, & your family is divided, a consequence of those joining the RIC post WWI. Had the RIC not been populated with thugs, had the British more thoughtful, then the ceremony MAY have worked. But it didn't and doubt it ever will.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
I wonder how would there be outcry if the Germans built and honored SS members. Hey, after all they had families also, This article only deals with a part of the story the Black and Tan were mercenaries - the Brits have always been good at that. He does mention and I understand it is a small article that after World War I there was high unemployment and the last thing the Brits wanted with the Russian Revolution and other violent struggles to have a large number of WW I veterans who knew how to kill very effectively without work. Also as the Brits are good at in their history pay others to do the "dirty work". The Black and Tan were killers and lets not pretend they were there to keep the peace. They had grown many of them damaged from the war and had grown to enjoy killing and torture. As for the killing of innocent RIC and others the author needs to read a history of how that started. The British Black and Tan would knock on the door of a man who was suspected of being in the IRA and shot him in front on his family at the front door or at the dinner table, it did not matter to them. After the Easter Rebellion the Brits executed in fake trails the men who had been deemed to be the ringleaders. Trial lasted a couple of minutes and then out you went to be shot. The executed men had uniforms and were soldiers. Now, with there have to be a vote since Northern Ireland has left the EU watch the violence or Troubles come again brought on by the Brits and their lackeys, Jim Trautman
Erick (Arizona)
Some might argue that as "police officers," the RIC ought to have been subject to different rules of engagement from those applied to an "army." Two circumstances militate against that notion. For one, centuries of persecution, expropriation, and terror had obviated any possibility of the type of strategic or moral equivalence between hostile parties that might warrant a concern for the usual niceties of armed combat. If two men agree to fight to settle a score and one of them throws sand in the others eyes, you can call him a scoundrel and I'll agree. If one man, unprovoked, has planted his boot on another man's neck, that other man can use any means at his disposal to escape the situation. Second, this was no ordinary police department, committed to upholding civil law in an impartial and professional manner. This was an institution whose pattern of behavior consistently affirmed its purpose as an instrument of imperialist oppression. “Some were off-duty, some were unarmed, and many were killed after capture,” he said. There is no such thing as an "off-duty" soldier in an occupying army during a struggle for independence. As for some of them being unarmed, it sounds to me as if they forgot to bring their guns to the war they were fighting.
Humanist (AK)
My Donegal-born great uncle Jacob (a Protestant), who served in the Great War, came back to Ireland to his father's farm in 1918, then served in the RIC. He disappeared in the early '20s. We've no idea where he died or where his body is. Although some of his distant ancestors came to Donegal from Scotland in the 1600s, he was as Irish as any European American is American. To refuse to acknowledge his existence merely because he was on the "wrong side" during the War of Independence or practiced the "wrong" form of Christianity is also wrong.
Jack (Fairfield, Calif.)
This is the equivalent of honoring the confederate soldiers who rebelled over the desire to enslave people in their state.
Amitava D (Columbia, Missouri)
@Jack If Union troops are to be honored in the North, why should we in the South not honor our forbears? Opposing slavery in the 19th century doesn't, by present day standards, mean that you were any better than those who supported slavery. If you read your history, it's quite evident that the opposition to slavery the North was driven far more by white supremacy & a desire to expunge any black presence from from this country than it was a desire to enfranchise the enslaved with any semblance of equal rights. To extend your analogy, if you oppose honoring the RIC fine; but if you think the IRA's fallen (who had plenty of innocent blood on their own hands) *should* be honored, you're either ignorant of history or a hypocrite.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Jack So true. The Brits and their paid Black and Tan and RIC knew what they were doing. Even now the amount of unsolved murders in Northern Ireland by the RIC and their paid informants is beyond belief. Cant sugar coat what they were and what they did. One story of the late 90's and innocent men shot in a pub and how to this day nothing has been done even with the documents indicated who was behind it and how the police covered it up. How does one feel living in a community where the murders pass you and smirk on the street knowing they are protected. The Troubles are coming back and the Brits could care less the cry will go out from Boris Johnson "We are a nation of Laws". For all the myth of the Brits and the Royal Family where ever the Brits have gone they have left uncounted dead and hatred. Jim Trautman
Laurence O'Bryan (Ireland)
You have to accept that the United Kingdom was a colonial power, guilty of many crimes against humanity in Ireland, to have any hope of understanding why we object to commemorating the RIC. This is a proven fact unless you are an apologist for the British Empire.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Laurence O'Bryan Could not agree more. The British history that Hollywood loves and the media portray as some wonderful democratic experience is a myth. I live in Canada and here the native population were put into reservations, their children sent to far away religion operated schools, where you were beaten for speaking your native language and hundreds died and were never accounted for. The history of Australia or any British colony is the same. In most instances they paid like RIC and other groups and here in Canada you know the myth of the red coated mounties a myth. They never left willingly, but were thrown by armed revolt. Their empire stole the resources of other nations brought them to England and controlled the colonies through force of arms. The Black and Tan and the British began the killing of innocents and covered up any of their own killing. The history of Northern Ireland is filled with unsolved murders. Did find it interesting the only killing they seemed to be interested in and came to Boston was one that might implicate Jerry Adams, if they wanted unsolved killing and information on them the same archives in Boston had tons of material on the right wing para military groups, but of course not interested in that. Jim Trautman
Gerrit (NYC)
@trautman Canada's residential schools came after independence from Britain. That one is on Canada to own, not its former overlords.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Gerrit Sorry to disagree even when Canada was never a nation in those times. It was still controlled by the white British class and even into the 1930's could not do much on its own. In the 1980's is when we finally got a written Constitution. Canadians sat in the House of Lords and basically everything had to be approved by Westminisiter. When World War I was declared by Britain - Canada never had a vote because Canada was also at war automatically because of the legal statues that defined. Even now each piece of legislation is signed off in the provinces by a governor general or if federal by a governor general also and each is the Queen's Representative. Canada was a Dominion until after World War II. Jim Trautman
Philip W (Boston)
Given that the British Police assassinated one of my ancestors in her backyard during the Independence War, I am shocked that the Republic would even consider honoring these murderers.
Cameo (San Antonio)
My grandfather was 17 when he served in the British army in WWI. He was sent to Gallipoli and survived one of the worst military slaughters in history. He returned to Dublin utterly traumatized and ostracized, unable to find employment. He had fought in the “wrong war,” while those at home were involved in the Easter Uprising and fight for Irish Home Rule. He subsequently enlisted in the RIC - loyal to the forces that paid him a pension until his death. He believed fiercely in civility and saw the rebels as leading Ireland to the same kind of destruction he witnessed in Gallipoli. The IRA blew the front door off of his house while his children slept. He emigrated to America, but was a broken man. Unable to witness anymore killing, he would usher a cockroach from his house. One man’s hero is another’s tyrant. Wars are a bloody, messy business that produce no winners - just foolish bickering about the rights and wrongs of events long past our understanding. Would my grandfather want his service commemorated? Only if it meant a greater peace. He never returned to Ireland and it broke his heart.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Cameo Check out Northern Ireland and see how nothing changed. It should have joined what became the Irish Republic, but the Brits love the old divide and conquer. Have you read the history who was the brains behind the doomed to fail in Gallipoli why it was Winston Churchill the same man who used poison gas in the Middle East in the 20's. Want butchers look at the British who even when WW II tried to make a peace deal with Hitler since the elite, business and rich wanted no war with someone who they deemed to be like them. I have little respect for the British and the myth of their history made them to look so good. Jim Trautman
misslawbore (London UK)
@RefugeeFromNY Irish independence - they gained it only to give it away to the European Union
Rob B (Oregon)
I think this issue just illustrates how the “troubles” of Ireland are still there... they’re just lurking a little below the surface. Unfortunately, I think it will take a new generation to fully recover from the ills of the past.
trautman (Orton, Ontario)
@Rob B When Northern Ireland becomes part of Ireland the way it should have in 1921. But, then again the British economy is based on selling arms and killing. So, there has to be a vote like in Scotland now that they have left the EU and the Troubles will be back and in fact have started already. Hey, if Trump wins and gets millions less votes there will be a revolution in America face facts change like Mao said "Comes from the barrel of a gun" never comes about by asking nice. Jim Trautman
kevin d cox (stafford nj)
@Rob B NI is the last bastion of the insolent British Empire.Any reminders of this occupying ''police'' force should die a traitors death. In just a few short years Sinn Fein will win popular vote and a United Ireland will finally be after a fractious century. Little England is finished
Damien O’Driscoll (Medicine Hat)
The problem is not just that Ireland should not be celebrating the Tans or the RIC, but also what it says about the thinking of the politicians who came up with the plan in the first place, and whether they are the right people to be charting Ireland's course at a pivotal moment of history. Ireland faces both danger and opportunity from Brexit. Most importantly Brexit, coming together with the arrival of a nationalist majority in the North, gives Ireland a unique chance to end partition and reunite.  But Ireland is stuck with a taioseach who doesn't care and says he feels no urgency. Ireland can't afford to fritter away this opportunity under a leader who doesn't get it. Ireland needs a taoiseach who feels it in his (or her) bones. Varadkar is just a technocrat and a bit of a seanin at that.
misslawbore (London UK)
@Damien O’Driscoll This reminds me of a train trip I made in Germany in the 1970s: I had a long chat with a man from the Republic of Ireland and he made no bones about the fact that while lip service was paid to it, secretly a United Ireland was not wanted by the people
EME (Brooklyn)
These were the armed enforcers of a brutal and unrelenting oppression that resulted in literally millions of Irish deaths through famine, torture and outright execution. Millions more were forced off their homeland. To say some were good, or some well-liked is nonsense and irrelevant. As a body, they were hated and the people fought them tooth and nail in order to win independence. One cannot celebrate both oppressor and rebel without mocking the Irish cause for freedom and all who served it.
gf (Ireland)
@EME, RIC were not armed. The memorial service was actually being organised by retired Irish policemen. Many RIC and DMP policemen became policemen in the new Irish Republic and many were not hated within the communities that they served. They were on the wrong side of history.
O’Brien (Canada)
RIC most definitely were armed as any archive from the time attests. Please read Dan Breen’s ‘My fight for Irish Freedom’ to see how the RIC were viewed by the rebels. In his account, the RIC served to enforce colonial rule and ultimately acted as local spies.
Damien O’Driscoll (Medicine Hat)
@gf That is absolutely false. The Dublin Metropolitan Police were unarmed, but the RIC were a paramilitary force who lived in barracks and were equipped with both rifles and pistols. Webley even produced a special .455 revolver called the Webley "RIC" which was standard issue to the force. Until 1880 the RIC used a .57-cal Enfield rifle shooting a Minié bullet. Lord Lieutenant W.E. Forster ordered them to switch to buckshot as a humane measure, and earned the nickname "Buckshot" Forster. Not only were the RIC fully armed, they didn't hesitate to use their weapons. In the two decades from 1824 to the Famine, they killed over 900 Irish peasants, mostly shot dead at fairs and frays. There were episodes in the Land War at the end of the 19th century where the RIC killed or wounded dozens of people in a single incident.
Thomas M.McDonagh (San Francisco)
There is an awful lot of sadness in Irish history. One bears the past in mind; but it is best to project positively,constructively and forcefully into the future.
stewarjt (all up in there some where)
@Thomas M.McDonagh What?
meo (nyc)
Poor old Ireland still can't get out of its own way. Peace and strength will only come when the Irish people stop burnishing their grudges and learn to truly forgive. Clearly, the pain inflicted by English colonization runs deep and people were torn and did bad things - that was then. It would truly serve the Irish to now recognize that all corners of their society lost loved ones. Recognize all for their humanity and move on.
Olenska (New England)
Ireland is a place of long memories; "that was then" doesn't have much resonance. The "bad things" being talked about in an independent country less than a century old happened within recent historical memory; they're the stories of grandparents and their generation, not "grudges" being burnished for effect. To give context, in the north of Ireland some Protestants still light giant bonfires every July to celebrate the "Glorious Revolution" (1688) and victory of Protestant king William of Orange over the Catholic king James II at the Battle of the Boyne (1690), which began the Protestant Ascendancy in the country. Even after the Good Friday Agreement brought peace to Northern Ireland, this highly contentious and divisive practice hasn't been abandoned. Move on? Easier said than done.
Logan (Florida)
@meo One news report hardly reflects the current state of a nation. Yes, many people objected to the planned commemoration, but it sounds like it was a dreadful idea in the first place. Maybe people objected for the same reason that 'politics and religion' are banned topics at many social events. Modern Ireland is a fantastic place with beautiful people and great attitude - digging up a difficult past is possibly people's only objection, understandably.
Ben (New York City)
@meo poor old Ireland? How ignorant you must be of the history. The conflict has been going on since the English first arrived there in the 12th century and stole, pillaged, and raped unit the Good Friday Agreement. Your assertions are as short sighted as telling the Israelis and Palestinians to "stop burnishing their grudges"
Vincent Trinka (Virginia)
It’s time for the Republic of Ireland to do what it needs to do...to unite Ireland into one country.
Jim Linnane (Bar Harbor)
@Vincent Trinka Northern Ireland is an economic basket case propped up by the English taxpayer as payment for the DUP's support of Theresa May's minority government. NI is a hindrance to a clean Brexit and Johnson has a majority government. The DUP is no longer needed so Johnson will throw them under the bus. Can or will the Irish taxpayer spend what it takes to keep newly acquired Unionist citizens happy?
Martin J. Duke (Cologne, Germany)
@Vincent Trinka German reunification took place in October 3 1990. And since then, there has been a supplementary tax paid by all German taxpayers called the Solidaritätszuschlag (Solidarity Surcharge) in order to rebuild the east German infrastructure. Over the last thirty years the "surcharge" has almost totaled 3 trillion euros, or an average of 100 billion euros a year. Germany could afford it and continues to produce budget surplus year over year. While I would not expect the cost of reunification to be quite so high if the Emerald Isle was to unify, could Ireland and Northern Ireland be able to commit financial resources needed to complete such a process without an infusion from Europe?
Olenska (New England)
Wait until discussions proceed further on how to commemorate Ireland's Civil War (1922-23). If all the casualties of that conflict are to be recognized (as a government-appointed group has said), how will the matter of those Irishmen executed by the new Free State government - officially 77, but more likely 81 or more - be handled? These men were members of the IRA who opposed the provisions of the Treaty by which Ireland's independence with England was sealed. They were tried by military tribunals in which they had no guaranteed rights to representation; to know the charges brought against them; or to call witnesses on their behalf. Because of the way cases were screened before being set for trial, they were effectively denied even the basic presumption of innocence. The government carried out multiple executions (at times on dubious or manufactured evidence) strategically - in parts of the country where fighting was fiercest, to send a message. It is only in relatively recent decades that the full story of the Civil War has been taught in Irish schools - although the conflict is fundamental to understanding the country's modern history (it is the genesis of two major political parties, for instance). The next few years should be interesting.
gf (Ireland)
@Olenska, yes and there were reprisals at this time on both sides going on. IRA murdered a lot of Irish Catholics who were ex-RIC and ex-British Army soldiers without any trials or evidence. Republican justice was -and still is - merciless. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/ira-campaign-in-co-cork-during-war-of-independence-not-sectarian-ucc-historian-argues-1.3171426 and it still goes on and affects our national election this Saturday, if you're branded an informer or criminal by the Republicans, then they think they can do and say what they like: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/who-was-paul-quinn-and-why-has-his-murder-become-an-election-issue-1.4162636 Why is NYT not covering current events?
Olenska (New England)
@gf : Seán Enright’s newly published book on the Civil War recounts the actions of both sides in unsparing detail. The Times plays catch-up with Irish issues of import. How old is this story about the police commemmorations, for instance? If it ever mentioned Paul Quinn it would be briefly, in a post-election retrospective, with, no doubt, a similar anthropological tone.
Olenska (New England)
@RefugeeFromNY: Collins knew that in signing the Treaty he was, as he said, “signing my death warrant.” He saw it not as the final, dispositive statement of Irish/British relations, but as “freedom to achieve freedom.” There was, however, no time for a measured discussion; while elements of the IRA and Cumann na mBan (as well as all the woman members of the Dáil) rejected the agreement, Churchill (in a communication sent to Collins “man to man” - outside diplomatic channels) was saying in effect “get that Treaty ratified or we will be back with everything we’ve got.” His death was immediately preceded by Arthur Griffith’s, leaving the new government without two of its leaders, and economically unstable. A fraught time - almost unimaginable, looking back.
Campbell Watson (New York, NY)
If that main image is not mislabeled, the next game at Croke Park will be a more somber affair.
gf (Ireland)
@Campbell Watson, it's poor editing all right! Victims were in Croke Park in 1920. These folks are in Glasnevin Cemetery in 2019.
bob (st louis)
Seems to me someone in Dublin just turned off their brain. Of Course there were some good people (as trump would say) in the RIC. But the record of the Constabulary and the Black and Tans is not likely to be forgotten in generations. I don't see the parallel to Iraq Police. We are tribal and our tribe is humanity. Find something more humane to celebrate.
gf (Ireland)
This was not about honouring the Black and Tans, it was for RIC and Dublin Metropolitan Police officers. Please report accurately! https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/justice-minister-insists-ric-commemoration-is-not-a-celebration-of-the-black-and-tans-38837971.html It was appalling the way that people used social media to disparage everyone who served in the police and their families. It seems we have not moved on, 100 years later. If Brexit taught us anything, it is how little Ireland matters to most people in the UK, and how it's time to stop pointing fingers (and guns) at each other in Ireland and to respect one another.
Jim Linnane (Bar Harbor)
@gf Right, if the English voters cared about the impact on Northern Ireland, a constituent part of the UK, they would not have supported Brexit.
Chris Woll (St. Louis)
@gf The article you linked to does not support your claim of inaccurate reporting but rather confirms NYT accuracy.