Highlights From the L.G.B.T.Q. Town Hall, Where Protesters Took the Spotlight

Oct 10, 2019 · 49 comments
L. (France)
I am disheartened by the negativity of commenters here. The Times has reported on the string of murders of Black and Latinx trans women. The hostility in the comments here, particularly given that these are readers of the Times, is deeply upsetting. Yes, these are women! Women, with complex histories, that face multiple types of discrimination, but who have a great deal to contribute to society, like anyone else, and who deserve protection like anyone else. Arguing that they undermine feminism, that they are proof that Black men are bad, that they will bring down the Democratic party by their selfish insistence on their right not to be killed... these are all deeply hostile responses. The Democrats were holding an LGBTQ forum. When else, if not then, should trans women raise their voices? I point readers to Masha Gessen's excellent article in the New Yorker, covering the recent Supreme Court hearings, including the prolonged and absurd focus on bathrooms rather than basic issues of employment discrimination.
Erica Smythe (Minnesota)
So Liz Warren thinks it's the job of the President of the United States to march into that 9 year old kids' school to insist the other students treat them with the respect and dignity they deserve? Really? Isn't this the job of teachers and administrators, or is she telling us those people are not up to the job? Also...why does a 9 year old who doesn't get to choose their own bed time get to choose their own gender? What am I missing?
KJ (Chicago)
The protestors absolutely did not “take the spot light”. The first ones ran in and out and Don Lemon tactfully diffused and even welcomed Blossom Brown. If the NYT reporters had watched the entire town hall, they would factually report that Elizabeth Warren and Mayor Pete “stole the spotlight”. Amy Klobuchar did pretty well too
KS (NY)
Last night was my true education; I didn't know there were so many gender types. I tried typing this comment on my Kindle Fire, and it wouldn't let me type the word "cisgender" (which I guess I am) --kept replacing it with "dispenser". I guess my Kindle is as confused as I am.
Lisa R (Tacoma)
Any reason why anti-semitism is not getting the same outcry? In New York City there are more hate crimes against Jews then every other minority combined. any reason the people obsessed with trans women of color are completely indifferent to this?
Bruce Thomson (Tokyo)
It’s not in the news as much.
finally (MA)
Did anyone have anything to say about lesbians in this forum on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender issues? Did any lesbians get the mic?
Lisa R (Tacoma)
@finally it's very interesting that the people who dominated were gay men and trans women (who are men who identify as women and sometimes have had some surgical work or hormonal treatment, sometimes not). Once again women are being erased. Previously we were called man haters by the right if we spoke up. but now we are called transphobic by the left if we speak up. I'm not a radical feminist in the least but I am horrified that men have taken over what it means to be a woman in this country and are now seeing as more important voice on women's issues then women who were actually born women and are biologically women.
Jake (New York)
By my math, 2 out of every 100,000 transgender Americans are murdered every year. By contrast, 5 out of every 100,000 Americans, as a whole, are murdered every year. The question should be why transgender people are killed at much lower rates than the general population. This is a crisis that does lot exist.
Lisa R (Tacoma)
@Jake also it's odd but they keep claiming that they are highlighting transgendered women of color who are murdered. Yet everybody they highlight and focus on is black. They never bring up the race of the perp. And I'm curious what a trans men whether of color or not there's not one peep about violence towards them. Apparently when men become women they become the most important women on the planet. On the other hand when women become men they become the least important men on the planet.
finally (MA)
@Jake Not only is it not an epidemic, but it is not even attributable to transphobia. Most of the murders, tragic as they are, were not motivated by transphobia and were not hate crimes. Most were murdered by people they knew. It is a complete lie to say that transwomen are being “systematically hunted in the street,” as one audience member stated. It helps no one to be dishonest about the risk factors for these deaths, but it is clear their deaths are being used and manipulated for someone else’s agenda.
KP (Commerce Michigan)
I tuned in during the middle of this town hall. And yes I support equal treatment and justice for all Americans. My fear is that this type of forum richly benefits the Republicans. Please Democrats avoid identify politics and stick to the bread and butter issues. Which by the way benefit us all. And for the LGBTQ community your best hope for securing the fair implementation of these rights rest with a Democratic candidate. Don't be too hasty in your judgements. They are our best hope.
Commenter (SF)
Commenter GabbyBoy complains: "I for one [don't] want ... someone shoved down my throat ... as the inevitable one." Better get used to that, since Elizabeth Warren has the nomination in the bag. The Republicans' strategic "response" to Warren is obvious: Label-and-dismiss her as a liar and a socialist. That may be good enough for the Democratic Party to win. Probably not, but maybe. The Democratic Party does need to make some fundamental decisions. First and foremost, the DP needs to recognize that Warren is going to be the DP nominee. Then the DP needs either to "soften" her positions or, instead, offer voters a stark choice between her and Trump. It's been traditional to do the former, but many DP heavyweights (Reich, for example) argue that that "tradition" need not and should not be maintained. That may "work" (though I doubt it). Though it's SOP for both major parties to "tack toward the center" once the candidate has been identified, I can't even imagine trying to "soften" any of Warren's views without those views quickly looking insincere. For better or worse, the DP has no real choice but to present Warren's positions to voters, not "softened," and hope for the best. Maybe undecided voters will embrace those positions and vote for Warren; maybe they'll reject them and vote for Trump. Either way, I don't think the DP has any choice.
Commenter (SF)
Regina Valdez makes some serious allegations: "Transwomen ... don't fight for women's rights." In other words, is it enough that transgender women fight for transgender women's rights and simply express sympathy for non-transgender women, or must transgender women fight for all women's rights? Transgender women insist that the former is good enough, but Ms. Valdez insists that the latter is required in order for transgender women to prove their sincerity. Who's right? Is passive support good enough?
finally (MA)
@Commenter I suppose it wouldn’t matter, if transwomen did not demand that women fight for transwomen, and redirect feminist organizations and events to prioritize transwomen. However, if transwomen want to take from women’s organizing, and they do, then maybe they could give back a little.
No big deal (New Orleans)
This is why the Democratic presidential hopefuls are out of touch with real America. Real America cares about real things, like the economy. Focusing on homosexual issues may be great for Pete Buttigieg, but that's not why Americans turn out to vote. The leftward drift of the Democratic party continues to turn one of America's 2 major parties into nothing more than a liberal fringe group. With the Party of Trump on the other side, and many normal Americans don't believe in either party anymore and are going to stay home on election day.
Lisa R (Tacoma)
Do these people ever say no to anyone in the "oppressed" category? It seems not.
Sara (Brooklyn)
Sad to see no mention of CNNs Chris Cuomos offensive "joke" about pronouns in this report. Its been trending on twitter all day. Cant say Im suprised though. Favourite Sons are often protected here
Ben (Seattle)
Nice. Let's eat our own because a minority constituency demands their concerns be center stage. Let's dismiss for now the thousands of Kurds who fought alongside us against ISIS that are currently getting shelled by Donny's autocrat buddies in the middle East. Call my utilitarian views here racist-bigotry, I guess. When you hear it so often, you really stop taking it seriously. The good news for the trans community is that this next generation of radicalized Muslims we are creating will kill many fewer of them than they will in the non-trans community. I'd wager that more Hispanics are killed in a month just from home-cooked white nationalist racism. Maybe more progress could be made if they scream louder than their competition for limited attention span...
notsofast (Manhattan)
The so-called "transgender rights movement" is part of the backlash against feminism & the war on women.
Step (Chicago)
As of October 8, 2019, the population of the United States is 329,784,700. The transgender population is 0.7% of the United States, which means we have about 23 million transgender people in the USA. A simple percentage of 18 deaths of 23 million is 0.000078%. Epidemic?
Regina Valdez (Harlem)
Nineteen deaths in less than one year. Let's see, it's ten month's in, so that makes 1.9 murders a month for transwomen. Meanwhile, violence against women in American continues to rise beyond its already epidemic porportions. There were 3,180 women murdered in 2018. Of those, 1,832 were white, 1,168 were black, not that race matters, as when it comes to violence against women, rape is rape and death is death. Period. Transwomen say they are women. But they don't fight for women's rights. They don't rally to keep America pro-choice. They don't fight for wage equality for women. They don't protest rampant violence and discrimination against women. Instead, they perpetuate it by calling 19 murders--not to say ANY murder is okay--an 'epidemic.' What this does is effectively erase the 3,180 women murdered in 2018. But transwomen don't care about women. They don't want to be 'us.' They want to dominate, oppress and silence women and force their way into women's spaces so they can colonize them with their own presence. This is a serious problem that most people are too afraid to discuss, yet bears great discussion.
Katerina M (Canada)
I am a trans women, and although I can see how you might be afraid that we are coming into female spaces to supposedly weaken women's rights, I can assure you that belief is very incorrect. I do not live in the US, but I can absolutely say that for us trans women in Canada - where our rights are firmly in the constitution - we at worse will face a lifetime of transphobia and discrimination because of failing to pass as women, and at best, will face the same misogyny that every CIS women fights against. So I can assure you, that much as we fight for our own rights, we will fight for women's rights, as our struggles are very related. I also think that, in a forum centered on LGBTQ issues, it is important to talk about the murders of black trans women. They are almost exclusively killed for being seen as trying to trap straight men into having sex with them. Which, although their murders are routed in the harmful belief that trans women are not women, they are equally, if not more centered in misogyny and a culture that enforces the belief that women are objects who are there for men to have sex with. I can understand how you might feel that trans women are there to harm women. But I can assure you, that as I deeply care about issues that affect the trans community, I care as much if not more about women's rights. Because I want to support and fight for my mother, my girlfriend, and my female friends, I also know that their issues are my issues.
Joanna (Georgia)
@Regina Valdez It seems clear that you don’t actually know any trans women, because every issue you mentioned, from wage inequality to violence to sexual assaults applies to all women, including ones who are trans. The trans women I know are as active in those fights as any other woman I know. And unlike other women, we can be fired simply for being trans. If you’ve kept up with SCOTUS then you may realize that the court this week took on the question of whether it’s perfectly OK to fire someone for being trans, or for being LGBT. The arguments were not encouraging. So yes, trans women are absolutely concerned about women’s issues because we’re women. We’re also concerned about this particular subset of women who on any given week are dragged behind cars, or mutilated simply because we offend people like you. In Dallas last month someone shot a random trans woman at a bus stop six times. He confessed to the shooting and was out of jail the next morning. That’s violence against women too, does that not even bother you a little? And it’s also a hate crime that isn’t considered one because hating trans women is expected. Even in comments in the Times. We’re all allowed to be concerned about more than one issue. If you’re offended that our being targeted and murdered offends us then I feel sorry for you in lots of ways.
Lisa R (Tacoma)
@Regina Valdez he also have no problem with anti-Semitism. Janet Mock refused to speak in front of a Jewish group under pressure buy an Islamic organization. there's far more anti-jewish violence then violence towards trans women of color so why are they hysterical about one and indifferent to the other?
Jared (VT)
I think transgender women of color deserve protection like everyone else. Given that most transgender women of color are victims of criminals who are also people of color, doesn’t this plea risk further targeting of the black community by the criminal justice system? Isn’t that the countervailing woke narrative?
JP (New Orleans)
@Jared Woke would be “thinking that transgender women of color deserve protection like everyone else” and knowing they do not receive such protection. Also, woke is understanding that their voices are rarely heard or their experiences uplifted, but, are often patronized and used for gaslighting purposes as you so eloquently demonstrate.
PaulB67 (Charlotte NC)
I hesitate to say this, but I will wager that the TV audience for this event was minuscule. And that's a problem because it reflects two realities confronting the Democratic candidates: The first is that there is little discernible difference among the candidates on LGBTQ rights. Frankly, it is boring to have speakers who all say pretty much the same thing. Second, and more problematic, is that the issue of violence specifically against trans gen black women is a clear example of how Democrats tend to get caught up in identity politics that, although certainly important, are by no means at the top of most voters' lists of pressing issues. Those issues are healthcare, the environment, and a rogue President who is doing everything in his power to put this nation back into the 1950s, if not the 1850s. These issues impact everyone, including trans gen black women, and it would be better if the candidates focused on these broader themes instead of allowing themselves to be manipulated into devoting an entire evening to an important but secondary issue.
Jenifer Wolf (New York)
@PaulB67 I've read that about 1 in 10 people is other than heterosexual. So this is an important demographic for Democrats to reach - on an ethical basis, but also on a practical one.
Bruce Thomson (Tokyo)
Yes, but they are not single-issue voters. Candidates must not be dismissive of them, but they need to stay focused on their main themes.
WorldPeace24/7 (SE Asia)
Let's face it, Liz Warren is as sharp as they get! Toss her a few lemons & she will have a chain of lemonade stands the next day. Toss her a serious question and she will instantly think & respond with answers others would take days to come up with. That is real leadership thinking. @Regina Valdez of Harlem makes a great point; we have to look at all the dynamics of mistreatment, including but not exclusive of the LGBTQ groups. Too many women & children are dying. This cannot be tolerated.
Gabbyboy (Colorado)
The CNN Town Halls are so superior to the it makes the DNC managed “debates” look pathetic. Maybe it’s because a candidate’s appearance isn’t predicated on money or polls. Town Halls give a wider view of the candidates’ policy ideas and personalities. What you see is what you get. No yelling, No finger wagging, No snark needed. Meanwhile the NYT etc. continue to report these events as if only the so-called ‘top’ 3 candidates matter; there’s a major disconnect going on between the media designated favorites and what actual voters are thinking...which is undecided. Let’s hear more about Beto, Harris, Mayor Pete, Booker, Steyer, etc. As voters we have some serious choices to make, and, I for one want to make an informed choice, and not for someone shoved down my throat by the media as the inevitable one.
Andy Deckman (Manhattan)
More incivility from random people declaring themselves ‘extraordinary’ and ‘deserving to be here.’ Because it’s all about this tiny micro-constituency, not the candidates running or the 300 million they seek to represent? Just another purity test for the candidates, but as Biden said acceptance is now normal, so can we tone down the hysteria? The word epidemic is so over used now it’s meaningless. 19 deaths, on pace for 25/year? Heart disease killed more Americans in the last half hour (610 000 deaths a year, more than one a minute).
JP (New Orleans)
@Andy Deckman This was a forum regarding equality, not heart disease. The time spent on the deaths of black transgender women last night was very short, including the time given to protestors. In fact, most (not all) candidates spoke very generally about LBGTQ issues even when answering questions that specifically addressed race and being LBGTQ. I can only imagine that this was part of the reason people felt they weren’t being heard. And, let’s not be naive, the candidates are giving black women attention, transgender or otherwise, because without a strategic increase in getting out the black vote especially the female black vote, democrats don’t win. Period. Black women consistently and fervently organize and bring people to the polls for the democratic party and they know it.
Rich Murphy (Palm City)
If my fellow Democrats can’t handle the protests while campaigning how can they govern?
Bruce Thomson (Tokyo)
They handled them just fine.
Randy (SF, NM)
Proving once again that progressives lack perspective, thrive on drama and eat their own. As a lifelong democrat who believes the country is in serious jeopardy under the republicans, I am angry that fringe elements of my party are controlling the narrative rather than working to make sure a democrat is elected next year. Blossom Brown may as well be fundraising for Trump.
Scott (Virginia)
@Randy indeed. So well stated I can only agree and add nothing.
notsofast (Manhattan)
@Randy I agree, except for your assumption that these "fringe elements" are actually members of your party (by which I presume you mean the Democrats.) I don't think they belong to any party except their own "identity" party. They just want to be seen, & they will take advantage of any opportunity that presents itself.
Tamara Sell (Houston, TX)
Don Lemon and Beto O'Rourke handled the interruption by Blossom Brown with class. Both listened, acknowledged and were respectful of her words. Just prior, Congressman O'Rourke was the only candidate to mention a black trans woman by name. As someone who has repeatedly brought up this issue in his campaign speeches, I find it frustrating that once again the NY Times only mentions O'Rourke as having the microphone taken from him, yet covers none of his talking points. I am again disappointed in the coverage by the NY Times and the propensity, through lack of coverage, to tip the scales of public opinion.
TR (knoxville)
@Tamara Sell Agree, that's a misleading headline. I wish the media would quit looking for conflict. This was a great conversation between politicians and constituents. There were some outbursts but it was handled well. This should be the norm.
Gabbyboy (Colorado)
@Tamara Sell I couldn’t agree more; O’Rourke was totally on top of his game last night. He showed he has the passion and courage for the job. No wishy washy no apologies, no poll slavery, what you see is what you get. Frankly I was surprised and pleased with how Lemon responded to the interruption. They both deserve a lot of credit for allowing Brown take the floor and speak her piece last night.
Hugh CC (Budapest)
”There were several moments of levity during the forum. One audience member asked Ms. Warren how she might respond to someone on the campaign trail say to her, “My faith teaches me that marriage is between one man and one woman.” She responded without missing a beat. “Well, I’m going to assume it’s a guy who said that,” Ms. Warren said flatly, “And I’m going to say, ‘Then just marry one woman. I’m cool with that.’” She paused for a moment and then added: “If you can find one.”” I support Ms. Warren but I would suggest she lose that flippant and demeaning answer. I expect there are plenty of women who would make the same comment about their faith. Why would she assume that only a man would say that? That part of her answer was shallow and frankly, surprising. We men vote, too. Why risk alienating us?
Preserving America (in Ohio)
@Hugh CC Wow, we're pretty touchy here, aren't we? Maybe now you can appreciate the women's complaints about men's jokes at their expense.
Eric (San Francisco)
@Hugh CC there is one whole party that cares little for the First Amendment and the incredible power it has in limiting what our government can do.
The North (North)
And maybe we should move beyond ‘It’s payback time’ comments. Or perhaps suffer them until somebody ( but who?) tells us we are all even now.
Matt Bowman (Maryland)
When the real debates begin and democrats bring their liberal college town speaking interruption tactics of shouting down and snatching mics, that should work out really well for us.
Miss Anne Thrope (Utah)
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all (people) are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. "
Mike (Eureka, CA)
@Miss Anne Thrope I love your moniker and your message. Maybe if we can try and imagine walking in someone else’s shoes instead of our own we could practice the state of grace that is called empathy?