Taliban Make Good on Pledge to Strike Afghan Election Campaign

Sep 17, 2019 · 22 comments
Dr. MB (Alexandria, VA)
Unless and until the United States defangs the debased to the core Pakistani military machine and their materiel and men, no peace can be expected in that region of the world, in particular in Afghanistan.
Ken B. (Brooklyn, NY)
What kind of lunacy does it take to stage scheduled outdoor campaign events--unless Americans or other Western allies perform rigorous security checks in a controlled area-- when this is the likely outcome? How does anyone in their right mind attend such an event unless he's in a bombproof suit? I do NOT get it.
Mateen (Lahore (Pakistan))
Failure of American and NATO forces to eliminate these barbarians will prove nightmare for Muslim World, as this would corroborate stance of extremists that even Ragtag fighters can defeat Alliance of powerful western world with their power of faith; most modern weaponry, technology cannot overcome faithfuls. There is dire need not to let this obsession prevail. Muslim countries are infested such so-called scholars who will trap youth for ulterior motives. All this mess which was started with so-called Afghan Jehad, and host myths about Afghanistan like graveyard of empires, must be rolled back by Western powers who once nurtured it.
New Yorker (New York)
Can anyone explain why are there so many young suicide bombers in the Muslim world, especially in countries like Afghanistan? Why would a young man, especially a teenager, sacrifice himself on the command of a far older person? He has a whole life ahead of him. This lunacy is beyond belief.
Allan Langland (Tucson)
@New Yorker If I remember correctly, the first suicide bombing in Afghanistan happened in 2004, and has been escalating ever since then. This tactic was imported by the Taliban from the Middle East, and initially employed brainwashed, and sometimes drugged, Pakistani teenagers. Suicide bombings or attacks were never a part of Afghan history or culture prior to their introduction by the Taliban.
Pat (Mich)
America, sadly, has become swallowed in the perpetual tumult that is Afghanistan. We laughed as the Russians scuttled out of there. The Brits couldn’t handle it. Yes they harbored Osama bin Laden for a short time when the Taliban ruled. The Taliban are strict Islamic rulers when in power, but no worse than the Saudis. I say we have given it a decent shot, but the Taliban don’t seem to be going away, so let us admit failure there and go.
Allan Langland (Tucson)
I believe that it is obvious to anyone who has spent time in Afghanistan and/or anyone who closely follows what is going on in that country that the Taliban have very little popular support. And for those Americans who would deny this fact, I ask would a group that has or desires support from the people show such callous and cruel disregard for innocent civilians? The Taliban's power and influence is based on fear and intimidation, and the Afghan people will suffer dearly from their brutal repression should they ever regain power. And a hasty U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan will likely facilitate a Taliban takeover, thus greatly increasing the bloodshed from its current levels.
DC (Ct)
16 years is not hasty.
Easy Goer (Louisiana)
As anyone who is well read fin the foreign policy, actions, reactions, etc. knows, Afghanistan is far too volatile a place for anyone to live, much less for America to get involved even more than we have been. At 18 years and counting, this is the longest "war" America has ever been involved with *"officially". We need to leave this country yesterday. Seriously at the very least, asap. *Note: According to documents released under the FOI Act (Freedom Of Information), the United States of America was "invoved" with the Vietnamese people (who were fighting amongst themselves) many years before this was known publicly. Back then, the region was better known as **"Indochina". The French thought they could "own" Vietnam. They were very wrong; just like America was very wrong. The Vietnamese people have been fighting other countries for a millineum, and no country has (ultimately) beat them, or (if preferred) "won a war" against them. They are a very resilient people. They have 2 things which are they known for everywhere. (1) They fight guerrilla-style warfare the best, and (2) They have earned the respect of everyone who has ever fought them. France, America, and many other much larger and more powerful countries, going hundreds of years back in history know this. When America began the war against Vietnam, many of our generals combat experience was from "open field warfare" from WWII. This is the opposite type of war we should have been fighting, which we learned far too late.
Pat (Mich)
@Easy Goer An apt comparison.
James McCrory (Georgia)
We have become involved in a civil war under the rationale of our national security and then depleted funds better spent here for health, education and infrastructure. In the face of no winning or honorable or favorable, how can spiritual leaders help with the women and children there. And how can we heal when we prolong the conflict because of own dearth of humility as a nation in general and within our leadership in particular.
Peter S.Mulshine (Phillipsburg,Nj)
@James McCrory Religion needs to be subordinate to people & the natural world.The USSR did a decent thing for women & the Afghan when they liberated that Country. Reagans perfidy is why we ever got involved there.Democracy liberates Republican Socialism kills.
Dr. MB (Alexandria, VA)
@Peter S.Mulshine In reality, the genesis of this entry into Afghanistan lay with President Carter, who depended on and blindly supported Dr. Brezhinsky--his NS Advisor.
DC (Florida)
Foreign military entanglements have turned out to be such rousing successes
MB (San Francisco, CA)
It is beyond comprehension that anyone thinks negotiations with the Taliban will ever lead to a successful conclusion to this unending conflict. And the consequences of their return to any kind of power will be a disaster for the Afghan people, particularly the women. Words fail.
sedanchair (Seattle)
@MB I don't think anyone is under any illusions. Negotiations are a cover to back out with a lot of flowery words about transition so we can ignore what happens next: the Taliban will promptly retake the country and execute the leaders of the puppet regime we've set up. That looks a lot like failure of course, which is why no one wants to take the leap. But there is no other solution.
John (Pittsburgh/Cologne)
@MB Correct, it will be an "unsuccessful conclusion" for the reasons that you cite. But an "unsuccessful conclusion" is still better for the U.S. than an "unsuccessful continuation".
Pat (Mich)
@MB Equally the men, probably worse.
Eric Lamar (WDC)
Here we go or here we've been? The Taliban, after Trump pulled the plug on negotiations, said be ready and they are as good as their word, at least this time. Trump made (at least) two huge mistakes, 1) excluding the Afghans and then wishing them to join and 2) inserting himself and choosing a wholly inappropriate venue for the conclusion. What resulted was a fiasco after he announced (unnecessarily) that it had all fallen to ruin. That last part is key: for him it is all about the show and the attention; robbed of the big event he still needed the attention so he went with the "I'll show them" twitter rant. The death of an American soldier, however tragic, was not in and of itself a reason to derail peace negotiations to, after all, end a war where more soldiers will be killed. Trump's foolish and egotistical "Camp David" moment will now result in a river of blood. MAGA!
Peter S.Mulshine (Phillipsburg,Nj)
@Eric Lamar Nixon did the same thing he tried to surrender call itsomething different & leave out the main party
seattle (washington)
@Eric Lamar The US did not "exclude the Afghans." It is the Taliban who refuse to meet with Afghan officials.
Jo Williams (Keizer)
Nonsense. The Taliban listened to the last Democrat debate. None of them want to keep our troops there. We’re tired. What does winning look like? The Taliban know. This is our exit strategy. Again. So then, what are we doing in Germany, Japan, South Korea, et all our other bases? Why are we concerned about Saudi oil fields? If we are tired of supporting elections, women’s rights, a free people’s right of self-determination- do we really care about royal oil wells? I ask again; what do we stand for in the world?