My Name Is Darlin. I Just Came Out of Detention.

Aug 13, 2019 · 68 comments
Heather (San Diego, CA)
Isn't the point of this video the completely unnecessary separation of family members during this whole process? If they are to be detained, then detain them together. If they are to wait somewhere for a hearing, then have them wait together. If they are to be deported, then deport them together! For heaven's sake. Life is short, and family is important. The issue of family separation is completely separate from the issue of how to reduce illegal migration and how to determine if someone deserves asylum or not. We are deliberately choosing to split families apart and stress them out when that has NOTHING to do with telling someone, yes, you're approved or sorry, you will have to return home. Let's not confuse problems. A family that illegally enters the U.S. does not need to be separated. That is purely an arbitrary decision that we have made about how to handle an influx of people. At the least, let's be humane about how we treat families while we work to figure out how many people our nation can afford to support, and how to help people stay in their homelands.
Thomas Zaslavsky (Binghamton, N.Y.)
@Heather "A family that illegally enters the U.S. does not need to be separated." Right! And the same for a family that legally enters, requesting asylum, and is kept caged or uncaged waiting for years, to starve if they don't take legal or illegal work. Why do we have many times too few immigration judges? That was a policy decision.
Deirdre (New Jersey)
My husband came here with his parents when he was 3. His mom did not have another baby for 7 years. They waited until they were stable and could afford it. I am liberal but this just isn’t right.
L osservatore (In fair Verona, where we lay our scene)
@Deirdre We need to come up with a new, workable solution to this situation, and actual Dreamers brought here as minors should geta free pass to stay - WHICH President Tump has offered to the Democrats already as part of a package. White your Congressman.
Judith Watters (Maine)
This family doesn’t need your permission - for anything.
Gwen Vilen (Minnesota)
I wish all these immigrant haters with all their tired old tropes could magically be transported to Honduras, with their families for a 1 month stay - and live in the same circumstances as these immigrants. If they survived the first week without getting shot, they would probably go insane by the end of the month. By that time they would likely be starting on the long trek to America to do time in a detention center. Take a walk in someone else’s shoes before you judge.
Liz (Florida)
@Gwen Vilen The same conditions prevail in our cities. Run by Democrats, providing a third world existence for our citizens.
Sirlar (Jersey City)
@Liz Crime in Republican-controlled areas of the country is far higher on a per capita basis on average than Democrat-controlled areas, including major cities.
sam finn (california)
@Gwen Vilen The world has nearly 8 billion people, and well over 7 billion of them live outside the USA. Just because they suffer harsh circumstances does not give them the right to come here, nor impose on the USA the duty to take them. Limits are needed, including numerical limits. I say, one million per year -- total -- all categories. Do you have a number -- total -- all categories? If not, that means no limits -- billions of them.
cece (bloomfield hills)
The bottom line is that we are all fed up with financing someone's choice to have a baby without the means to pay for that child. It's a sacrifice that many of us make but we witness millions of other place the burden of that cost on the rest of us...illegal or not.
D F (USA)
@cece So you support government-funded contraception and abortion? Because the current administration seems hell bent on making sure there are lots of unwanted children in this country.
noname (Bay Area,CA)
@cece Where will Darlin go for low cost birth control?
Ariel (New Mexico)
@noname Pretty much anywhere. It's very widely available, nevermind merely relying on methods like withdrawal. She's 26 and had one previous pregnancy so quite clearly has knowledge of pregnancy prevention.
Cynthia (New York)
I don't know what makes me sadder... Darlin's story, or the abject heartlessness of the all of the commenters so far.
Liz (Florida)
@Cynthia For heartlessness, I give you the example of Disney World a few years ago, who tossed something like 200 native born workers for H1B visas that were less knowledgeable, but worked for less. The outrage that followed influenced them to rehire 70.
Duffy (Rockville MD)
@Liz apples and oranges Liz apples and oranges. It's really the high end immigrant that threatens US jobs not people like this family. No one I know wants to work in a chicken processing family. Cynthia is right, there is a lack of compassion and empathy.
Maria (Denver)
@Cynthia. Yes! In my eighty years of life I’ve noticed that unkindness, negativity and harsh judgement impede problem solving. The heartless comments mask the mindfulness humanity has to solve the immigration challenge.
Paul Johnson (Helena, MT)
Superb. Thank you Ms. Castro, very well done. It's very visceral to have the neutral reports from the media and cold data from the government reduced to living, breathing human beings in crisis. I do wonder about our humanity as Americans, I fear we are losing our capacity for sympathy and empathy. Racism still seems to be branded on our national DNA. So baseless when the objects of our hate are all but identical to us genetically, and so dehumanizing, for us and for them. I was greatly cheered by Darlin's strength and grace though; has not that been the story of the immigrant in America: big hope for a better life in the land of the free. I wish her family the vey best.
Heather (San Diego, CA)
Isn't the point of this video the completely unnecessary separation of family members during this whole process? If they are to be detained, then detain them together. If they are to wait somewhere for a hearing, then have them wait together. If they are to be deported, then deport them together! For heaven's sake. Life is short, and family is important. The issue of family separation is completely separate from the issue of how to reduce illegal migration and how to determine if someone deserves asylum or not. We are deliberately choosing to split families apart and stress them out when that has NOTHING to do with telling someone, yes, you're approved or sorry, you will have to return home. Let's not confuse problems. A family that illegally enters the U.S. does not need to be separated. That is purely an arbitrary decision that we have made about how to handle an influx of people. At the least, let's be humane about how we treat families while we work to figure out how many people our nation can afford to support, and how to help people stay in their homelands.
Daphne (Petaluma, CA)
Separating children from parents or relatives who say they are the parents is wrong. Our lax enforcement of laws for the past 40 years is the reason we are now seeing caravans and people from Africa, Haiti, the Middle East coming toward our borders, not just Latin Americans. There was a time when we could have controlled immigration by enforcing labor laws and e-verify. The only answer now is to restrict entry to people who will become citizens and succeed in our country, and not add to our already swollen welfare rolls. Yes, we are a wealthy country, and we can afford to take in desperate people, but not every desperate person in the world. Blame the government for this mess, and blame us for winking and hiring.
Gwe (Ny)
Well. I don't know. This opened up waterworks I have been holding on to for weeks..... Though you would not know it, if you saw me, I am grief stricken. I have lost something enormous these past three years. four if you count 2015. I have lost many friends. I have lost faith in many people. I have lost faith in my country, in my place in the world and in my faith in humanity. I am saddened every single day by the examples in my daily life of the indifference to suffering that my fellow citizens can easily tolerate. Their intolerance, indifference and sometimes downright meanness has changed me in irrevocable ways. As an example.... I just commented on another piece here. A person helpfully instructed a Dreamer to "leave" after expounding supposed sympathy for her situation. It was one of the thousands of such sentiments that I have read. Reminders that people are devoid of empathy, kindness, grace.....somethign I used to believe was in high quantities around me but which now I see is sorely lacking. .....and then comes this simple piece. Why am I crying? Words. Certain words. "three years younger than I am"---the author is trying to put herself in Darlin's shoes. "I tried to understand"..... reminded me of my favorite Stephen Covery adage, "seek to understand and not be understood".... The inherent decency in the writer. The name "Darlin" which sounds so much like an endearment than a person in peril. THANK. YOU. Today, I needed this.
Donald (NJ)
These immigration familial situations have been occurring since the INA was written by the US Congress. All of a sudden Trump is President and all of these situations hit the press on a daily basis. Enough already. If you break the law then you suffer the consequences.
Veronica Jordan (Santa Rosa, CA)
Wow, I am shocked by so the ignorance of so many of these comments. Readers who keep calling this family "illegal" and those who said they came to the US "illegally"-- Do you realize that US law says that if people are seeking asylum (i.e. they are seeking protection as a refugee and waiting for processing) are supposed to present at the border and ask for protection. Under U.S. law, a “refugee” is a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country because of a “well-founded fear of persecution” due to race, membership in a particular social group, political opinion, religion, or national origin. These human beings, real life men, women and children, are fleeing violence, tremendous unemployment rates and terrible political instability. Many are literally fearing for their lives. International law says that if you are fearing for your life, you should go to a border and ask for protection. There is NOTHING illegal about that. And what happened to this family? Jefry presented with his son Hamilthon to the border to ask for protection, and his young son-- his child-- was physically removed from him and send thousands of miles away. For what crime? And what crime in this country is punished by removing a child from his father's custody? It's so atrocious it's practically unbelievable. Shame on you for your ignorance. And shame on you for not walking in that mom or dad's shoes for 15 whole minutes. Thank you, Isabel, for this documentary.
Katalina (Austin, TX)
So very sad, indeed tragic. Another child on the way in these extremely difficult circumstances. Poor mother, father, all. Planned Parenthood might have made a difference. Is there any assistance from those who oppose abortion to help Darlin as her story continues?
Judy Fern (Margate, NJ)
@Katalina At the least, Planned Parenthood could have provided condoms so this young mother wouldn't be stretched beyond her capabilities.
SJR (South Carolina)
I told myself I didn't have time to watch a 15 minutes video, but once I clicked on it I couldn't stop watching. How painful. Powerful. And in ten-year-old Hamilton's moments of joy (including when he literally cannot wait to jump on the school bus in his Texas neighborhood), his fear and his shining intelligence, how wonderfully affirming. What's to be done in this situation? I begin to think it's impossible to resolve. The process of osmosis as it relates to movements of people -- impoverished and oppressed people moving inexorably toward those regions that are freer and more stable, is a force that can never be "deterred" long-term. I admire the film-maker for illustrating so simply the lives that are at stake.
Frank (Québec)
It saddens me to see the depth of animosity, rudeness, and plain cruelty that is now such a large part of life in America. I can remember when people there treated one another -- friend or stranger -- with civility and genuine goodwill. I admit I liked America better then.
DREU💤 (Bluesky)
The comments are hard to read. But what bothers me about the immigration rhetoric is the lack of journalism about the employers and the US mafia that traffics with immigrants. For example, the arrest of over 700 undocumented migrants. Zero arrests for the employers. Businesses did not receive an influx of US nationals workers to replace the ones detained. The same has happened every time for many decades now. So if the government is going to separate families, and be tough on immigration, what about starting at home, with the employers and the cartels that traffic people to make their businesses more profitable.
CNNNNC (CT)
@DREU💤 Agreed. I'm all for prosecuting human traffickers certainly and employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. 'Knowingly' is part of the problem though. Many many times illegal immigrants have falsified or stolen SSN and green cards. E-Verify should be mandatory. Any 'mismatch' with social security and ID fraud should be prosecuted just as it would be if the employee was a citizen. I have never heard of an illegal immigrant prosecuted for the rampant ID fraud perpetrated. And then what does the federal government do with states like California that pass laws prosecuting employers for using, rechecking E-Verify and giving that information to the feds?
denny stern (seattle)
@DREU💤 our governments policy is capricious cruel & senseless. we need a new government. the current leadership of ignorant racists has to go.
D F (USA)
@CNNNNC Your post includes the solution. E-verify will catch undocumented immigrants, but employers don't want to know. They want cheap, willing labor and they are happy to break the law to get it. Until the employers are punished, nothing will change. If the employers are punished, there will be a wild backtrack on the anti-immigration front, at least from the businesses and government. By then, of course, the xenophobia will be so entrenched that it may take years to undo.
George Hawkeye (Vallejo, California)
Besides looking for a protagonist that would support a pre-conceived narrative to her story, Ms. Castro claims she got involved with Darlin in "an attempt to understand a government policy that was incomprehensible to me," fair enough. Unfortunately she doesn't say if she wrote to her Representative in Congress to ask clarification about that policy she doesn't understand. Surely that would be a great starting point, and possibly her representative would explain to her about the US laws, and the process established to deal with asylum petitioners, and the process American citizens, not aliens, can use to change those laws, and how taxes pay for those services Darlin and her family get free of charge. But that would deprive Ms. Castro of a logical flow about her theme.
Liz (Florida)
@George Hawkeye The reason she thinks the policy is "incomprehensible" is that she thinks the US is a large free convenience for the rest of the world to walk into, a situation which our laxness in implementing the law has fostered. Citizens have a right to determine what the laws shall be. Trump won on tat issue and will again, probably.
KennyG (Montreal)
@Liz Sure, they do. Citizens did decide long ago that signing treaties and passing laws allowing people to claim asylum was a positive thing. I haven't noticed anyone repealing those laws anytime in recent history, so currently, citizens have to live with those decisions.
Thomas Zaslavsky (Binghamton, N.Y.)
@George Hawkeye It is safe to say that her representative doesn't have the days or expertise necessary to explain the arcane, complicated, difficult, and unpredictable system we have set up, with far too few immigration judges so we have to pile people up in revolting holding cages.
Visible (Usa)
It seems that the central theme of anti-immigration folks is that immigrants are taking our jobs and/or money. If wealthy immigrants came here and were not looking for work because they have so much money, is that the ideal scenario? Is that what people are wanting? Or is it something else. I'm very curious. Let's look at the facts. America has MORE THAN ENOUGH money to offer basic benefits to immigrants (and native citizens!!!) who need it. Despite having TRILLIONS of dollars within our economy, people seem to think that there's just not enough money out there to offer anything good to the people in this country. Let's distribute our wealth better, instead of concentrating all the wealth within a small group instead of pretending there isn't any money. Furthermore, the work immigrants do HELPS OUR ECONOMY which in turn offers more jobs to native citizens. For every job an immigrant "takes" from an American, even more jobs are created. It's a net gain. Immigration is not a zero sum game. More is more when it comes to immigration. More does not mean less for you. Immigration makes our country strong. Yes, we can't take every person who wants to come here. Nobody is arguing for that. But let's keep America a place people want to come to, ok? We want to be the restaurant with a line out the door, not a restaurant that nobody wants to eat at.
john640 (armonk, ny)
@Visible "More does not mean less for you." Depends on who "you" is. Your comment ignores the plight of lower income native born Americans who perceive, sometimes rightly, that their incomes and/or jobs are being injured or destroyed by a flood of desperate immigrants, many here illegally, who will work for less than prevailing US wages and accept very poor working conditions. Perhaps the economy as a whole is stronger, but there are lot of losers in the process. Anger over immigration is not all racism (although this is a factor). Anger arises from the perception that immigration is taking away jobs and lowering pay. Sometimes this is clearly true, while other times cheap immigrant labor may make US businesses viable, when they might otherwise to fold to foreign competition. Solutions are not easy. Finding the right balance is a very big problem.
PeteNorCal (California)
@john640. Excellent post, succinct and knowledgeable. Thanks.
monicashouts (New Mexico)
@john640 The main threat at the border is the threat to the health and safety of desperate families seeking asylum. The U.S. has many real problems: low wages, smart technology replacing humans in the workforce, lax gun laws, the steep cost of higher education, farmers forced out of business by Trump tariffs, global warming, the mass extinction of species and folks who seem to have no idea how to adapt to the modern world.
Mike F. (NJ)
The bottom-line is they came to the US illegally. Therefore, in a way, what's happened to them has been voluntary. They may be very nice people, hardworking, but they are here illegally. If what's happened to them bothers people who are US citizens and can vote, those people should work to change the law and our immigration system through their elected representatives. Unless it's a case of political asylum where an immigrant's life is at risk, US taxpayers should not be asked to support any immigrant, legal or illegal. Let's take that tax money and provide adequate health care for our veterans.
monicashouts (New Mexico)
@Mike F. Crossing the border for the first time illegally is akin to getting a speeding ticket. Should the government take away your children for getting a speeding ticket? Immigrants illegally in the U.S. collectively contribute nearly $12 billion each year to state and local tax coffers, according to a new report from the Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy. Illegal immigrants do more to contribute to our war veterans than our president who has bragged about not paying his taxes.
Thomas Zaslavsky (Binghamton, N.Y.)
@Mike F. You don't know they came illegally. They may well have come legally. It seems to make little difference if you are poor and from south of the border.
CNNNNC (CT)
@monicashouts state and local governments should be holding everyone accountable for the same laws - tax laws, ID laws, wage laws, work rules....Yet citizens are prosecuted for not paying full proper taxes, having a fake ID, lying to get benefits, filing fraudulent EITC on cash earnings while illegal immigrants are exempt because their illegal status takes precedence. The result is an entire class of residents who are above the law; exempt from the laws, costs and responsibilities citizens are held accountable for. That is unsustainable.
Madcap1 (Charlotte NC)
I read the comments before looking at the video and raised an eyebrow at the tone of most of the comments. A minute or so into the video explained it all. The last thing anyone should do in attempting to elicit compassion for a people’s plight is show people with skin that dark to Americans. Next time, use some folks coming in from Europe.
Sivaram Pochiraju (Hyderabad, India)
One day or the other, there should be full stop, comma won’t help.
Michael (Morris Township, NJ)
They should never have been allowed in and should be sent home ASAP.
shimr (Spring Valley, NY)
@Michael Let me ask you a question. During the early years of the Holocaust (c. 1940) a ship carrying 937 Jewish refugees was not admitted to the U.S.A. They were sent back to Europe, where they perished in concentration camps. Do refugees such as these facing life threatening situations at home have a right of refuge? Should the US government provide sufficient judges to hear claims for asylum, as international law demands? Or should we follow Trump's policy of separating families and have them wait interminable lengths of time while they stay in Mexico to have a hearing?
Beth Grant DeRoos (Califonria)
While I believe we need to help those escaping violence, I also believe that if you have not become legal via the process hearing, and have no green card, no job the least you can do is not have more children, since it will be the American taxpayer paying for the child. It would also be nice if our government and the UN got serious about making sure these countries people are leaving, start caring about their own people! How many millions of US aid have gone to Honduras and not been tracked to make sure the money hasn't gone to corrupt government leaders? And what about the tens of thousands of folks who have played by the rules and filed out the forms for legal immigration, and have been waiting 2,3, 5 years?
Steven B (new york)
@Beth Grant DeRoos Yes! Our country is worth the wait. Please do it legally.
Sirlar (Jersey City)
There needs to be far more stories on the countries from which these immigrants come from highlighting the massive corruption and total indifference of the plutocrats in those countries toward their own working class. It's the plutocrats of these countries who are to blame, in the same way that slave-owning class of the South was responsible for runaway slaves to the North. There is very little difference between the behavior of the slave-owning class of the South and the plutocrat class of the immigrant-sending countries of today. And what's worse for us today is that not only is there nobody talking about it, there is no plan by any of these countries to make things better. Sure, we must have compassion for these migrants, as many people in the North had compassion for runaway slaves before abolition. But we, the United States, have to put full-court pressure on the plutocrat class of these countries to make life better for the working class. They can start by doubling the minimum wage in those countries, where the working class receives a much smaller share of national income than the working class of the US. Then they can start forcing their plutocrats to pay their fair share of taxes. Doing these two things alone would reduce migration significantly. But like I said, there is no plan, only to dump the excess population into the US and let us worry about it.
0sugarytreats (your town, maybe)
@Sirlar uh, we can't even deal with our own Plutocrat class. But if we're going to focus on those countries, my first question has to be: how has the U.S., and or U.S interests (read: American companies/capitalism) contributed to whatever is going on down there? One thing I learned, living abroad, is that the U.S. has it hands (or has had its hands) in just about everything, and U.S. citizens don't know the half (or 10th) of it. How did we contribute? Maybe (just maybe), if we figure that out, out, we could figure out how, exactly, we could actually help. In the meantime, we offer asylum. And compassion. Or we ought to, anyway.
Thomas Zaslavsky (Binghamton, N.Y.)
@0sugarytreats You put your finger on it. But the self-satisfied descendants of immigrants who were legal because that before we restricted immigration will not pay attention to the history.
sam finn (california)
They can be together any time they want -- outside the USA. The legal presence in the USA of one family member does not grant the right to legal presence to another. Whatever separation they claim to suffer is a separation of their own making.
Earth (Portland OR)
@sam finn wow what if they are facing death in their home country - does that even matter to you? Where is the humanity in this country? Is it dead like our democracy?
Common Sense Guy (California)
Family members could be happily united in their native country without the fear of being deported
jack (NY)
Uneducated, non English speaking and pregnant. While she be a productive citizen? I spent many years in the Bronx with immigrants from Mexico, El Salvador, Haiti-barring exceptions, they all replicated the inner city indigent folk culture-unemployment, teenage pregnancy, drugs, violence and an abundance of children.
Gwe (Ny)
@jack A lovely little story, but statically incomplete. EVERY immigrant group begins in "ghettos" and then people rise up. I could take the time to educate you, but you can google. If you go to wikipedia or any other site you will learn about what has happened to other Hispanic groups once they have assimilated. Like every other once derided group (Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews) they intermarry, start businesses, go to college and eventually melt in..... Get educated. Please.
BB (Geneva)
@jack Immigrants don’t need to speak English to work and contribute. The woman who cares for my dying grand mother 24/7 speaks no English. We have all made do and my previously anti-immigrant gran says she wants all “Mexicans” gone — except for her wonderful helper who’s teaching her Spanish and giving her the ability to live out her final months at home in dignity.
lieberma (Philadelphia PA)
If the boarders will be sealed tight to uneducated migrants and illegals the problems of detention camps and dividing families will disappear. Americas needy, homeless, poor families come first.
Larry Levy (Midland, MI)
@lieberma Are you aware that America's red states, especially in the Deep South, draw on more government largesse than other states? McConnell's Kentucky, for one glaring example.
ms (ca)
The problem with these videos by the NY Times is I don't think they serve to advance the discussion on immigration if they are meant to merely tug at our heart strings. Rather they just illustrate to those who against immigration, xenophobic, etc. further reasons to argue against rational immigration policy. People are right when they say media does not focus on the problems of citizens enough, at least if I went by the Op-docs. So many have concentrated on immigration and not enough about the struggle US citizens face. Also, the immigrants portrayed do themselves no favors in some circumstances with the way they behave. For instance, it stands out to me that Darlin, despite her precarious immigration status, economic situation, etc. still chose to have another child. Perhaps this is a ploy to have a baby turn citizen merely because they are born in the country. (I've seen this happen both with poor and wealthy, educated immigrants/ tourists.) Having a child is an extra strain on her, her family, the country, our taxes, etc. but did she or her partner think about that? Note I am my family were immigrants ourselves -- refugee from another country -- and my mother made well and sure not to have children during the years we first arrived. She did it for our family but that also has consequences for the country, on a macro level when extended to millions of immigrants.
dre (NYC)
These stories are sad and endless. But what to do. On this issue to a large degree today it seems to boil down to a choice between those that essentially want open borders for everyone (what could be called the good-hearted fool approach). And those that don't want hardly any immigrants (the cold hearted view). And most of us who believe in a balance between having compassion and equally what is rational and affordable. Most know we'd be overrun with immigrants if we throw the doors open with little or no rules or restrictions. Most of us believe we should take in immigrants, but there have to be limits, we want rational rules and vetting followed. People should come in at established ports of entry, they need to be screened to ensure that they don’t represent a threat to the country. Are they educated, do they have skills we need. No, we shouldn't separate children, but it seems we don't have facilities to house & feed all in comfort for months or years while some pursue asylum claims. And also provide medical care, schooling and other services for everyone who wants in. And economic migrants are not the same as refugees from war and violence, which potentially number countless millions by themselves. So what's the answer, it certainly isn't simple. It's a complicated problem -- we should be as humane as possible but we also have to be rational. We should strive for that humane goal as best we reasonably can. Don't know what else we can do and be realistic.
Jim (H)
The 24 hour sound bite cycle only allows for Twitter long answers, rationality doesn’t exist.
Larry Levy (Midland, MI)
@dre Rational? How about providing a legitimate, fair, and efficient vetting process for asylum seekers?
alan haigh (carmel, ny)
Trump is really pleased that liberals are taking his bait and keeping the immigration issue in the news day after day, because it makes liberals seem as stupid as he is to the American public. If you care about the suffering of the poor people in central America, including the children, consider this. If a parent brings two children into the state of CA and they stay. Those children will cost the taxpayers of CA close to $40,000 a year just for their schooling. How much good could be done for the children in Guatemala with that kind of money if it was used down there where tens of thousands of children are suffering the consequences of a failed government. Immigration policies have to make sense to more than our hearts. Start thinking liberals, or give Trump another 4 years. Complain about his foreign policy and sew into it the issue of helping these poor people. Stupid kind-hardheartedness that wastes resources in indefensible. Mother Theresa would know better.
Jeff (California)
@alan haigh: Gee, if it costs $40,000 a year to teach a child in elementary school who exactly is paying for i? Certainly not the American citizens who send their children to Public Schools. As a native born American Citizen, my CA state taxes were never more than a $1000 a year , so who paid the nearly $80,000 a year for 18 years that you claim cost to educate my two American born citizen children? By the way, the vast majority if illegals hold jobs which deduct State and Federal taxes from their paychecks. Since they are illegal they can't file income tax returns, so they are paying a much higher percentage of their wages to educate their children that the comparable citizen is. The truth about Republican immigration policies is that they know they will get votes while at the same time they shield Republican businesses who knowingly hire illegals.
alan haigh (carmel, ny)
@Jeff In my county in NY, we spend over 18,000 per year for individual students which comes out of property tax, so I probably should have used NY. CA spends about 10.1, near the bottom of the nation and that's why their formerly great public school system is now near the bottom and professionals send their kids to private schools there. If you reduce the number to 20 grand a year from 40, the point is as salient.
jack (NY)
@Jeff A quick google search will show you that its about $10,000 annual for each kid in the US (for public schooling).