Fire the Officer in the Eric Garner Case? De Blasio Falters

Jul 17, 2019 · 72 comments
Joe Pearce (Brooklyn)
In the end it turns into nothing more than just another political circus. Mom, who surely had some part in her son's reaching 400 pounds, emerges periodically to lament his passing, people demonstrate in Lower Manhattan (this was during the day; do any of these people in the photograph work?), family members tell us what a good fellow he was (even with a rap sheet a mile long), etc. I am going to ask the most terrible question I can think of here: The family received something like 6 million dollars from the City in compensation for Mr. Garner's death. If, by some great miracle, Mr. Garner could suddenly be resurrected, how much of that money would they willingly give up to have him back with them? Would they really want him back at a cost of 6 million bucks? Or would they be organizing their own chokeholds to get rid of the family embarrassment and hold onto their mercenary gains? None of them will ever have to sell single cigarettes in the street. I said it was a terrible question. Just answer it honestly!
Lily Quinones (Binghamton, NY)
Mr. de Blasio has made it a point to bring up his black wife and black son but he allows this police officer who choked a man to death to remain on the job. I wonder how he would feel if that was his son that had been choked to death, Eric Garner was somebody's son, brother, loved one. Mr. de Blasio is a fake politician and nothing else.
Jesse (East Village)
Of course he is. So what else is new?
JDSept (New England)
@Lily Quinones Fire him for what? Has anybody found this officer guilty of anything yet? Fire him without just shown cause and you have a huge lawsuit. This needs to playout until the end to see what the options are. The mayor is in a tough spot because he can't be seen to prejudice any on going investigations either.
Jason (New York City)
Due process? The officer needs to be fired! I just hope he does not retire and collect his pension or get 3/4ers.
Michael McAllister (NYC)
DiBlasio is a frightened lap dog for the NYPD, a once proud police organization that has gone rogue over the past 2 decades, since Nine Eleven. He will not oppose or call out their brutality, their fiddling with crime stats, their continued refusal to deploy body cameras, the secrecy around civilian complaints and disciplinary records, or their wild, profane and thuggish frat boy culture. They are the biggest gang in NYC. And they are armed.
lou andrews (Portland Oregon)
@Michael McAllister- 2 decades, try 50-60 years or longer.. Serpico proved thatwithout a doubt how corrupt the city cops are, i was born raised and spent30+ of my life in NYC, and have seen first hand how rogue, inept dirty, scandlous most cops are. As for the good cops, well, they aren't so good when they turn a blind eye to illegality and corruption when the see it occur. So much for the"good cop" theory
DBesq (New York NY)
Fire Pantaleo. He should have the decency to resign. At least he still walks the earth.
lou andrews (Portland Oregon)
@DBesq - fire de Blasio and thecommisioner and de-certify the union.. also the people in the personnel department who approve these people when the apply for the job.. their standards are askew and have been for decades
MJG (Valley Stream)
Bureaucracies love to drag out investigative processes. Whether it's investigating teachers, cops, doctors, whatever...they take their sweet time causing needless and tremendous pain to all, while those could being investigated remain in a never ending limbo. It's neither fair to the Garners, nor the Pantaleos, for this matter to take years to settle. The only people who love this are the lawyers who can bill and bill and bill for the"exhaustive investigation".
Mama (CA)
I'm not going to vote for a mayor who won't adequately respond to police brutality, or to his own populace. I think many Americans agree with me on that, and on thinking deBlasio is de-blasé, should step aside in order to ease the path to 2020 for the very well qualified women running for President, and get back to basics in managing NYC.
Tigress (U.S.,A.)
To be fair, had Eric Garner killed a cop, I don't think Garner would have been charged, either. He'd've been executed: As he was, for selling cigarettes.
DSM14 (Westfield NJ)
After so many years of exploiting his wife and son as political symbols to block black candidates from defeating him, perhaps the chickens will come home to roost. When Al Sharpton can credibly criticize you for false promises, not seeking justice and hypocrisy, you know you are in serious trouble.
JP (NYC)
I enjoy a good De Blasio bashing as much as the next person, but per this very article, "As a legal matter, Mr. de Blasio cannot directly fire Officer Pantaleo; that role falls to the police commissioner, James P. O’Neill." So really what is De Blasio to do here? Pull a Trump and threaten to fire O'Neill if he doesn't let De Blasio rule by executive fiat? As for O'Neill, he's doing the right thing to let the process play out. Personally, I think Pantaleo should be fired for poor police work (although I don't think he's guilty of a criminal act), but that said Pantaleo deserves a full, fair process as much as any other worker does. Justice is not vengeance. In many cases it requires punishment, but it should not be rushed to appease those thirsty to essentially avenge what happened to Eric Garner.
Frank (Colorado)
Tawana Sharpton has no credibility. I don't know why anybody listens to him. The officer violated protocol and the deceased violated the law. He also did not do what the officers told him to do. Trying to decide who bears how much ownership of the outcome of this unfortunate incident is a complex task and not given easily to short newspaper columns. I am surprised that the officer is still employed by NYPD but I also know that his contract and local and federal labor laws have some applicability here. I suspect that the NYPD Commissioner will let the officer go for use of a forbidden tactic and I believe that would be the correct decision. But as to the multi-causal complexity of the outcome, I think "reasonable doubt" can be found as to absolute responsibility.
Anonymous (Around)
"I can't breathe!" is a pretty clear indicator that someone is in a dire state, especially when being, essentially, physically assaulted (albeit by a police officer doing part of his job -- rather poorly). I know numbers of domestic violence survivors who shuddered at how Garner was treated, as it was all too familiar. NYC law enforcement certainly seems to have had a problem recognizing assault and battery by its own, particularly when strangulation is one of the methods. Vance comes to mind; wasn't he the head of NYC law enforcement at the time?
lou andrews (Portland Oregon)
@Frank- selling loose cigarettes? less of an offense than a traffic ticket.. violating the law? well, the law is wrong, period!!!
Mary Travers (Manhattan)
I write so someone at the paper will read my opinion. Not only is this guy not fired he is collecting $26K + in overtime . OVERTIME at a desk job I top of a $75k salary. I also would like deBlasio fired for reasons so obvious I need not repeat
Frank Knarf (Idaho)
The narrative repeated in so many of these comments that "Pantaleo choked Garner to death" has little resemblance to the actual evidence available to those who have decided not to prosecute. Whether those who now will decide how or if to sanction Pantaleo will pay more attention to that evidence or to Sharpton and the rest of the braying mob for political considerations is an interesting question. Respect for collective bargaining agreements that protect employees from management whims seems to be rather flexible for certain progressives.
Anonymous (Around)
You're correct. They should have been more accurate and called it what it appeared to be: strangulation. You should also learn more and start using the correct terminology. It matters.
ANNE IN MAINE (MAINE)
And de Blasio has the nerve to run for president of US--this is a new definition of chutzpah.
Elaine (Atlantic City,NJ 08401)
Officer Pantaleo is currently on desk duty, received 120k raise and has pension benefits. So, I don’t feel sorry for him. About the DOJ, Eric Holder, supported charging, Loretta Lynch got push back from the Feds in Brooklyn. The Brooklyn civil rights division led by Vanita Gupta kept pushing the “not enough evidence” song. Lynch supported charges. Lynch replaced the FBI agents and the prosecutors, put in a new team from outside NY. Then the Trump/Sessions/Barr gang took over and it was a wrap. The deadline to charge was July 17th. Complete failure, enough for everyone
Frank (Colorado)
@Elaine Nobody in the NYPD ever gets a $120K raise.
CHRIS (NYC)
I think the mayor is acting exactly as he should in this case. Let the administrative process proceed as proscribed by law. If he came out with an opinion on the guilt of the trial for any significant case effecting nyc it would be prejudicial and possibly grounds for appeal. The reason this is taking so long is because the federal department of justice held on to this case for years before dropping it with no action.
JDSept (New England)
@Vgg City based its decision on what? This cop has been shown to be guilty of what by whom? Any court or administrative board yet? Fire him unjustly and you just might lose a huge suit costing the city what?
annpatricia23 (Rockland)
Five years. Was the thinking that the passage of time would make it less heinous and few people would notice? That the public would have moved on? This was one of the most brutal and egregious murders in the history of this city, carried out in broad daylight and filmed. Five years, ten, twenty, it will not be forgotten. Eric Garner said 11 times he could not breathe. It was excessive use of force. Time cannot alter that.
Vgg (NYC)
@B. so police can be judge, jury and pass death sentence for selling loosies (a fact which was never proved). Would you say the same if the cops had executed him - same outcome - for not happily coming along with them.
annpatricia23 (Rockland)
@B. That he was 400 lbs is completely beside the point. At least you didn't blame his mother which another commentator has! So you don't think it was egregious because he didn't move along. But you don't disagree that it was brutal. Because he died.
Abeke (NYC)
@B So let’s call a spade a spade, America is a police stare where you are summarily executed by selling loose cigarettes without trial or accountability. It is what it is but you can’t have it both ways proclaim how great and free the country is and kill people for no reason.
Stuart Wilder (Doylestown, PA)
Rule of law is rule of law. Even police officers deserve it, as do criminals whom we all know committed crimes. The process is as important as the result. Oh, and Al Sharpton? Has he ever apologized for calling that DA and state trooper rapists 30 years ago? Why does anyone care what he thinks?
ATF (Gulfport Fl.)
@Stuart Wilder Don't hold your breath waiting for Sharpton to apologize. However, his reprehensible past actions don't stop Democratic, liberal candidates from publicly meeting with him at every opportunity in an effort to pander to black voters.
Vgg (NYC)
@Stuart Wilder Rule of law is rule of law and that does not give police officers the rights to kill people willy nilly. They pressed down and closed this man's airway and caused his death. Selling a cigarette is not something you kill someone for.
Pete in Downtown (back in town)
Missing from this piece is the ridiculously slow pace of the investigation by the Federal Department of Justice, which started five years ago under Obama and his AGs, and dragged on long enough for Trump's AG Barr and now his Justice department to declare that they will not prosecute Eric Garner's death. While I am no fan of De Blasio, I think let the ongoing process play out, and then scream bloody murder if the NYPD commissioner does not fire Pantaleo AND De Blasio doesn't step in and makes him fire Pantaleo. Right now, if De Blasio steps in without waiting for the trial to finish, he may as well fire his police commissioner. In the meantime, why isn't the NYTimes asking former AG Eric Holder why he didn't push harder for (then) his Justice Dept to prosecute Pantaleo? Maybe that's just too inconvenient?
Nycoolbreez (Huntington)
This whole situation is a disaster. Maybe Blaz could use this as an opportunity to show the stronghold “First responders” and their unions have on the executive and legislative branches of city and state government
CHRIS (NYC)
Or perhaps this is the codified legal process that the government is required to follow as per the laws it created.
Nycoolbreez (Huntington)
Or perhaps this is the result years of bad collective bargaining by our government reps
CHRIS (NYC)
Yes. They created these laws.
lou andrews (Portland Oregon)
I think it's pretty clear to me that de Blasio is bending over backward for the PBA's support. Remember when he first took office years ago. He was criticized by the PBA so much so it was bordering on personal insults and threats not to enforce the law in the city. So, i bet a backroom deal was struck and when Garner's death, excuse me, murder occurred , de Blasio agreed to delay, dealy and obstruct the invesigation and aministraive trial and firing. 5 years have passed, what other reason can there be? One or two years maybe, but 5 years? de Blasio will never get the Democratic nomination, Eric Garner, is the reason why. Too bad there isn't a recall from office statute in NYC, i would even fly back and take up residence for one year just to vote to recall this fake progressive mayor. He looks out for himself and not for justice for all NewYorkers.
CHRIS (NYC)
The administrative hearing does not occur until all criminal charges have been adjudicated. The US Dept of Justice sat on this case for 4 years without any indication on what they were going to do. NYC finally said they are proceeding no matter what and forced the feds to make their decision.
lou andrews (Portland Oregon)
@CHRIS- you just contradicted your own argument. The city went ahead with the administraive hearinds BEFORE the feds issued their decision. You may want to re-read your comments. the city could have done what they recently did, long ago regardless of what the Feds were considering. It seems to me that the city officials didn't think Garner case, his murder, was as mportant as compared to the policial aspirations of de Blasio and his realtionship with the corrupt PBA
Steven McCain (New York)
The Mayor is like a cat on a hot tin roof. He kicked the can down the road for five years and now he has run out of road. The mayor used his son as a prop to win his first term because people thought he would have real honest oversight over The NYPD. When the cops turned their backs on his honor he caved and has caved ever since. The Mayor is running for president under the guise he can take on Trump. When my neighbors hear De Blasio thump his chest most of them laugh. For five years The Mayor ducked this and now he is in a pickle of his own making.
MIKEinNYC (NYC)
Officer Pantoleo should be charged with second degree murder or at least manslaughter. Garner was doing nothing illegal when he was harassed by the cops. What was he doing, selling cigarettes, one at a time, that he himself owned and bought and paid the tax on? Kearly our mayor is too lame to get this done. New York s loudmouth governor and attorney general should take the lead on this. It is within their jurisdiction.
C In NY (NYC)
Mr. Gardner was selling "loosies" which is illegal. He then resisted arrest, which is also illegal. Grand jury did not indicate, and as they say grand juries will indict a ham sandwich. The Federal Government has found no violation. These are the facts.
MIKEinNYC (NYC)
@C In NY . 1. Cite the section of law that makes selling cigarettes one at a time illegal. And if you can I would imagine that the prescribed sanction is a ticket, not capital punishment by choking. 2. The Feds were looking at civil rights violations which in this case looks to see if what the cop did was racially motivated and which they could not prove. The Feds don't generally prosecute manslaughter allegation. That is local and that is where the locals, the incompetent DeBlasio and Cuomo, have failed us yet again. Ask Cuomo to put up an ugly bridge so he can name it after his daddy and he's all there. Our state Attorney General is also useless except when it comes to going after Trump.
Joe Pearce (Brooklyn)
@MIKEinNYC Mr. Garner WAS doing something illegal, and he had done it and been arrested for it something like 30 times before. He DID NOT pay the taxes on those cigarettes. This may be very small stuff, but there is a law and nobody has the right to break it. And nobody has the right to refuse to be arrested by an officer in performance of his duties under such laws. It has already been decided, more than once, that there is no second degree murder here, or manslaughter. That's what they have grand juries for, but people like you want to see these cases submitted over and over and over again until they come out your way. That is a kind of judicial fascism.
Chris (SW PA)
The democrats can write a very demeaning resolution, but they act no differently than a republican when it comes to actual actions. Talk is cheap and democrats talk is definitely bargain basement. The GOP is hideous and that is the only thing that gives democrats even a bit of support. What the democrats routinely fail to do, however, is to act upon their rhetoric. It is proven over and over again that they say these things only to manipulate us into voting for them, while they support the same true constituency as the GOP.
Richard (Bellingham wa)
This opinion piece is unbalanced. DeBlasio is right to insist on following due process rather than impatient feelings to deal with Pantaleo. That The grand jury didn’t bring charges against Pantaleo is one reason to proceed circumspectly. That the police commissioner, alone, not the mayor, can fire Pantaleo is further reason for the mayor to let the process unfold. That Diblasio won the mayoralty due to the political ad about his having a black son whom he counseled about dealing with the police is dubious at best and as committing him to fire Pantaleo it is far fetched. That al sharpton chimes in with blustery rhetoric is just demagoguery.
Steven McCain (New York)
@Richard The process has gone on for five years? It would have been great if Pantaleo had on given Mr. Garner his due process. Selling loose cigarettes should not cost a Human Being his life! When Mr. Garner said he could not breathe the officer should have believed him.
Richard (Bellingham wa)
@Steven McCain. So because it’s been 5 years we should turn the decision over to public sentiment (what used to be a kangaroo court)? The Grand Jury heard about “loose” cigarettes and “I can’t breathe” and other details. They heard the whole story with all the details and still did not charge him with a crime. You, however, citing two facts out of context find him guilty of a crime, probably a racist one at that. Let’s not pursue a justice system on emotion. That’s what happened in the segregationist South.
C In NY (NYC)
Mr. Gardner could have stopped resisting arrest
Ken (NYC)
Why are they (all the police officers that had their hands on Mr. Garner and the supervisor at the scene) not ALL fired or at the very minimum punished already?? Definitely reeks of police privilege and protection.
CHRIS (NYC)
If a cop puts his hands on someone and he dies, they should be fired? No matter what the circumstances or their particular role in the incident?
JP (NYC)
@Ken The sad truth is because the supervising officers on the scene weren't white, so it doesn't fit the convenient narrative of bad white guy oppresses poor minority, and then we'd have to have difficult conversations about the police not as racists but simply as a group of people that doesn't have sufficient accountability.
stan continople (brooklyn)
@Ken For the officers it was pure sport. They were on top of Garner like a pack of hyenas trying to bring down a large prey. If he hadn't died, they'd still be boasting about that wonderful day.
afunnystory (Earth)
Is anyone in NYC Surprised? Making grandstanding statements followed by excuses and inaction is the modus operandi of DeBlasio. Let not forget this is the same pandering Mayor who claims he wants to make NYC the "most green" city in the country while refusing to stop taking an SVU motorcade to the gym every day.
SR (New York)
Although I typically find Mr. De Blasio personifies the worst in the mayoralties of NYC, as a 72-year-old lifelong New Yorker, I am in total agreement with him that all police officers deserve due process and this is not to be delivered by self-appointed mobs or other self-appointed leaders such as Alfred Sharpton.
Mon Ray (KS)
President Obama and his Department of Justice had almost 3 years to develop charges in the death of Eric Garner but did not because they realized that there was no evidentiary or other basis on which to bring charges. Obama and his DOJ then decided to toss this political hot potato to the next administration, Trump’s, which reached the same conclusion. The New York State Attorney General’s office also concluded that there was no basis to bring charges. The US is a country of law. If two successive US Departments of Justice (one under a black President) and the NY State Attorney General could not—in 5 years!—find cause to charge the officer, most likely there really is no basis for charging the officer.
Mary Travers (Manhattan)
@Mon Ray. But every basis for firing him and the other holding him down
Mon Ray (KS)
@Mary Travers I haven’t seen any citations of the police procedures or rules that were violated that would justify firings. If you have them it would be informative to post them.
JLH/MSH (Philadelphia, Pa)
All of the officers involved should be fired.
Mon Ray (KS)
Here is why the officer in question could not be charged and should not be fired: President Obama and his Department of Justice had almost 3 years to develop charges in the death of Eric Garner but did not because they realized that there was no evidentiary or other basis on which to bring charges. Obama and his DOJ then decided to toss this political hot potato to the next administration, Trump’s, which reached the same conclusion. The New York State Attorney General’s office also concluded that there was no basis to bring charges. The US is a country of law. If two successive US Departments of Justice (one under a black President) and the NY State Attorney General could not—in 5 years!—find cause to charge the officer, most likely there really is no basis for charging the officer.
umberto dindo (new york)
“Enough is enough, de Blasio, step up,” Ms. Flagg-Garner said on Tuesday. “Do your job. Stop trying to be a president when you can’t even be a mayor.” This says it all.
fast/furious (Washington, DC)
Eric Garner's family deserves justice. So far, there's none to be found.
Robert B (Brooklyn, NY)
This should not surprise anyone considering that de Blasio was at the center of a series of conspiracy investigations involving his fundraisers and fixers bribing New York Police Department officials for favors. It is hardly isolated. De Blasio has lot in common with Trump. He refuses to fill most city agency positions, and when he does, he chooses sycophants. His emails he fought the release of show he's vicious, vindictive, and petty, so qualified people won't work for him. It is hard to fathom after all this time why anyone still thinks de Blaiso was ever a progressive or liberal champion. He's a pretender, a guy who defiantly defends his privilege to take luxury SUVs from one borough to another just so he can use his favorite health club while the City becomes hopelessly unaffordable, unlivable, and impossible to navigate. As if there aren't enough con-men in politics, in de Blaiso we have another. He's more than happy to pay lip-service to any progressive social policy as long as it doesn't cost the wealthy, and particularly his scandalously wealthy real estate donors, a penny, or risk offending powerful interests who already don't like Democrats, like the PBA and the SBA. A letter was just discovered from the Sergeants Benevolent Association (SBA) President Ed Mullins telling members to defy New York City politicians and "stand shoulder-to-shoulder" with ICE agents during raids in NYC. de Blasio should absolutely confront the SBA over it, but don't bet on it.
James (New York)
@Robert B Hear! Hear!
Space Needle (Seattle)
The Justice Department is right that Mr. Garnet’s death is a tragedy. But the tragedy is that police officers once again escalated a situation that could have been so easily defused, and instead used excessive force to murder Mr. Garner. We’ll hear the usual comments about police “fearing for their lives” and “having to make split second decisions”. But none of that applies here. It simply was not necessary to use these techniques to “bring down” a citizen who was no danger to anyone. The officers involved had many choices, but chose to escalate. Mr Garner died because these officers used excessive force. All Americans should be alarmed that justice once again is denied, and that police murder goes unpunished.
Mon Ray (KS)
@Space Needle President Obama and his Department of Justice had almost 3 years to develop charges in the death of Eric Garner but did not because they found that there was no evidentiary or other basis on which to bring charges. Obama and his DOJ then decided to toss this political hot potato to the next administration, Trump’s, which reached the same conclusion. The New York State Attorney General’s office also concluded that there was no basis to bring charges. The US is a country of law. If two successive US Departments of Justice (one under a black President) and the NY State Attorney General could not—in 5 years!—find cause to charge the officer, most likely there really is no basis for charging the officer.
JP (NYC)
@Space Needle Throwing around a ridiculous term like "murder" in this context, makes it impossible to have productive conversations around police reform. Even the medical examiner hired by the Garner family concluded that an asthma attack killed Eric Garner. So for Pantaleo to have committed murder he would have had to have known that (a). Garner had asthma, (b). pulling Garner down would trigger an asthma attack (c). that an asthma attack would likely be fatal for Garner. That seems pretty far fetched. Additionally, Garner's defenders in trying to paint him in a positive light have consistently asserted that when police came up to him, he'd just broken up a fight - a seemingly strenuous activity that he'd managed to do without fatal health complications. Furthermore as someone with asthma, I can tell you that when you have attack, you can't breathe regardless of whether or not you're dealing with external compression of the lungs or windpipe, so Garner crying out, "I can't breathe" doesn't necessarily mean he couldn't breathe because Pantaleo was still compressing his throat. Mr. Pantaleo is a poor police officer who unnecessarily escalated a situation and he should be dismissed from his job as a poor performer. But equating him with a murderer is reckless and irresponsible and poisons the conversations we need to have around police reform and accountability.
SusanStoHelit (California)
Pantaleo is the patsy. There were several officers restraining Garner, and the primary blame is on the one kneeling on his chest after he was restrained and the supervising officers who did nothing at all to help him, the ambulance technicians who didn't pick up on the seriousness of his condition. The choke hold wasn't a solid one - if it were, Garner wouldn't have been able to talk. The stress of the restraint and the arrest and being on the ground with an officer's weight on him is what made the asthma attack so deadly. To pretend this is on the one officer, who did not cut off Garner's air (otherwise he wouldn't have been able to say "I can't breathe" - a basic lesson the ER taught me), not on all of the factors, is a game, trying to pick one sacrificial lamb so you can pretend that is the only problem. He used a choke hold he shouldn't have - but he wasn't the only, nor the worst problem. A knee on the back of a man who is having trouble breathing is a problem. And while police might not recognize the symptoms, for the ambulance technicians to also be so relaxed about his condition is what made this asthma attack fatal.
KKW (NYC)
@SusanStoHelit Ok. Fire them all. Garner was not an imminent threat to anyone. He wasn't committing a crime that endangered anyone in particular. None of this gang subduing him or those responding was in danger. This was callous, cruel and deadly conduct by public servants who are supposed to be concerned about public safety and health. No one should be treated this way. Especially by trained law enforcement officers and EMTs. And all of them should be held accountable for Garner's death. I don't think your comment leads to the conclusion that no one involved should bear responsibility when a person selling a loose cigarette dies for what would have been a misdemeanor. The point is that anyone using force sufficient to kill someone in response to the sale of loose cigarettes and the EMTs standing by and doing nothing to intervene are not suited for public employment in the positions they hold. Their poor judgment and callousness were deadly to Garner and a future threat to all of us.
AP (NYC)
@SusanStoHelit FIRST, Garner was accused of selling an untaxed cigarette to some guy that no one could name or point to. Witnesses said Garner did nothing but break up a fight. Verbal protest with hands and arms wide open, no weapons, no move toward officers, does NOT justify Pantaleo to leap up out of out left field, and throw a choke hold on a taller man, pulling him down by his throat, and causing everything else to follow. That he held his head to the pavement, twisted, as the Garner told him he could not breathe, was not fighting, and was already in hand cuffs behind his back is even worse. Now add that this same officer has been accused of similar, and, finally that he mugs, smirks and waves to the camera while Garner lies dead by his hands is ENOUGH to say that this officer is UNFIT to serve!
Matt (Central CT)
@AP I read @SusanStoHelit 's comment as calling attention to the actions of the entire squad, not as a "let Pantaleo off the hook" kind of thing. Everyone involved should be held accountable for their actual malice or clear negligence in this horrifying episode. Pantaleo may have incited "everything else to follow," but singling him out and letting his fellow officers and the EMTs escape responsibility is wrong.