Before Fatal Boat Crash in Budapest, Safety Warnings Went Unheeded

Jun 11, 2019 · 41 comments
Rich Murphy (Palm City)
It is great for those of us waiting for the “Revolution” to read the complaints of you wealthy Times reading cruisers. Now if I could just get Viking to stop sending the monthly brochure they have been sending for 20 years.
Steve (New Jersey)
I was on a Viking Danube cruise at the time of this awful accident. It's difficult to see clearly in the video that was published, but it sure looked like the smaller boat cut in front of the Viking ship. If indeed that was the case, there was not much the larger ship could do; it's not like stepping on the brake of a car. Perhaps one of the bigger questions is why these two ships were so close together to begin with. Also, much has been written about the Viking captain, but I've yet to read a word about the captain of the smaller ship. Seems to me more information is needed before any judgments can be made.
kalacs (Budapest)
@Steve According to the rules, Viking's captain should have called the Hableany's captain on radio that he wants to overtake. This did not happen.
Laura (Florida)
@Steve I was also there at the time, and you are correct! In the video we saw while we were in Budapest, it definitely looked like the smaller boat was trying to pass the Viking longboat and underestimated the swift current and the space needed when he cut in front of it. We could actually see the long boat try to veer left at the last minute, but the pylons under the bridge we’re in the way. We were shocked when they arrested the Viking captain.
Bruce Michel (Dayton OH)
In 2015 we were at the bow of our cruise ship (not Viking) during the impressive night time loop in Budapest. Suddenly full reverse because a small floating restaurant had pulled in front of our ship. Luckily we were a few meters short of a collision. The next day the captain talked to the passengers about the incident, which was captured on his radar. He chose to not report this incident to the authorities.
kate (Brooklyn)
Check your facts. The Viking "longships" carry about 200 passengers. This is more than most river ships but certainly far from 1,000.
abowers5 (Aliquippa, PA)
@kate You’re right. I was on one last fall on the Danube.
European American (Midwest)
@kate, "The newest cruise ships, known as longships...able to accommodate several hundred guests...the number of cruise vessels plying the river...346 ships with 50,616 beds..." works out to an average of 146 beds per boat. What's with this 1,000 number?
LAMom (Los Angeles)
Well, I guess I won't be taking that European river cruise after all. It sounds like the authorities have no solution for preventing this type of accident in the future. Thanks to the NY Times for the reporting.
Helena Markova (Slovakia, Europe)
@LAMom One big problem is this - and not only on river and not only in Europe - we must go and see all we have in our tourist plan IN SPITE OF WEATHER CONDITIONS.
Peter Melzer (C'ville, VA)
This tragic collision reminds me of the one in Philadelphia in which a sightseeing duck boat was plowed under by a barge. The Sigyn is built like a barge with a plow-shaped bow protruding above the waterline that will push a small vessel colliding head on under instead of aside. In my mind, the design of the cruise ship may have contributed instrumentally to this tragedy.
Bohemian Sarah (Footloose In Eastern Europe)
The role of corruption and oligarchy can't be overlooked. The Danube has been a major water thoroughfare for millenia. I would suspect that during the time of the Hapsburgs it was even busier than today. What's different now is that the world level of mayhem is growing exponentially. Counterintuitive, you may think, but the anonymity of the Internet and the growth of affordable travel seems to be contributing to increasingly selfish and outrageous behavior. Maybe it's that technology is making us lazy - when there were no radios, skippers and crew were more vigilant about rules of the road and keeping watch. Whatever the cause of these disasters, it's clear that Orban and Company are making a bundle on tourism. This shouldn't be mutually exclusive with safety, traffic quotas and stricter governance of licensing and qualifications. Thank you, New York Times, for helping to publicize this tragedy. Let's hope that it puts pressure on the Orban regime to clean up the river traffic. Let's also hope that this accident encourages the European Union to up their insufficient pressure on Orban to reduce the grifting and stop chipping away at Hungary's fading democracy.
Hal (Illinois)
Profit is everything, lives are cheap. It's the American way. Well at least Boeing would agree with me, huh?
Lisa (NYC)
Whether it's too many boats clogging a beautiful scenic area, helicopters providing aerial views of the Manhattan skyline, or people being so involved with their selfies as to fall off a mountainside, it's clear that we need to stop focusing on checklists and get back to basics. And that includes considering the effect that all of this has on our planet, and how we can enjoy responsible travel and experiences.
Commentary (Miami)
My husband and I were in Budapest just a few weeks before the accident. We took a short day cruise on one of the many boats lining the river. I am ashamed to admit that not once did we think of our safety, nor did the cruise company. No mention of life jackets, exits or what to do in an emergency. Obviously, we will never get on a boat again without first reviewing safety procedures.
Lisa (NYC)
@Commentary I'm always this way on such boats. I always find out where the lifejackets are located. One time I was on one of the commuter boats from Manhattan over to Sandy Hook beach in NJ. There was a welcome announcement telling us the duration of the ride, etc., but not a word about lifejackets. I went over to one of the employees, asked where the lifejackets were, and he said 'oh, they're in a box up at the front of the boat'. Wanting to see for myself, I headed up to the front end of the boat. There I saw a large white metal box with a lid. The lid was padlocked closed. But it gets better. The box was surrounded on all sides by about 20 bikes leaning up against it. You talk about a disaster waiting to happen? In the meantime, I wrote an appropriate account of this on Yelp, and also alerted the local Port Authority (whom I don't believe ever acknowledged my note...)
abowers5 (Aliquippa, PA)
@Commentary I was on a river cruise last October that traversed the Danube from its starting point in Germany and was supposed to end in Budapest. We wound up being bused to Budapest from Vienna because of low water levels. There were people on this cruise that were outraged at Viking for following the directive of the Hungarian government! Public safety is a non-negotiable issue.
Glenn (South Carolina)
I’ve been on several Viking cruises including one that took us to Budapest. I can assure you, Viking takes safety very seriously.
Andrew (Bupadest, Hungary)
Sailing rules are as strict as flying rules (a lot of them came from sailing, by the way). It works extremely well, but the trick is, you have to follow them. Sadly, the Viking cruiser didn't keep them, nor intended to communicate with the traffic around the ship. Accelerated while approaching the Margaret Bridge, where, between the pillars of the bridge, the water flow faster, increasing the suction effect between two ships close by, effectively sucked the Mermaid in front of itself, then steamrolled it. On the footage it's clearly visible, the small ship had no chance. I watched the wreck shipped further down to investigated from the side of the Danube today, it was a sad view, but, i'm glad to the special forces who made the rescue possible. At the tragic day, cold, heavy rain, then the cold, very heavy flow, at practically 0 visibility, then the heat for the last few days, it was a hell of a job in itself, but mother nature provided some. I can only hope, everybody following the rules and never again i have too see something like this.
Robert Nevins (Nashua, NH)
Before the Times or its readers disparage Viking they may want to take into account that thousands of people have enjoyed these cruises for many years. My wife and I cruised with Viking from Budapest to Amsterdam four years ago and had a great safe journey. Viking long ships on the Danube carry approximately 200 passengers, not 1,000 as reported.
michaeltide (Bothell, WA)
@Robert Nevins, I'm glad you enjoyed your cruise. I was not so happy with mine. The river became impassable (too low) at one point and we needed to be bused to a second ship that hadn't been adequately prepared, particularly the ventilation system. Several passengers, including me, developed coughs on the new boat, and I finished my cruise in hospital in Köln, rather than in Amsterdam. There are many good things about Viking cruises, but they tend to have little latitude for, or patience with onboard emergencies. It is not surprising to me that they got their boat back in service quickly.
Carl Pugh (St Petersburg Russia)
Wherever in the world you find tourists and water there will likely be tour boat mayhem. We just stepped off a tour boat here in Russia where there are many dozens flying in all directions on the canals and bays. Concern for our safety was never far from my mind.
Robert FL (Palmetto, FL.)
As a 25 year U.S. Coast Guard licensed captain (100 ton Ocean Operator) I can say that from the poor quality video of the accident, both vessels were at fault. The circumstances were exacerbated by the strong current behind the vessels and the looming choke point of the bridge. In open water the burden would have been on the Viking ship to stay clear of the Mermaid it was attempting to overtake. However with the Viking committed to the narrow bridge opening and greatly reduced maneuverability due to the rushing current astern, Mermaid should have prudently stayed out of the way, if possible. We may never know if the captain of Mermaid was even aware of the Viking's close approach, at that point in the video the Viking captain was incapable of avoiding colliding with the Mermaid, or the bridge. What transpired in the five minutes leading up to the collision will be decisive.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@Robert FL Thank you for your excellent and educated assessment. It sounds like a tragedy waiting to happen. My fear is that this won't be the last. I think the most disturbing element of this story for me was when I read "the test for a pilot license for boats under 20 feet changed in 2013, when a former government official took over a company that trained pilots for the written part of the exam. . . David Szekeres, a 47-year-old boat captain who trains skippers with his Gabriella Sailing company stated " You don’t have to learn anything about sailing,” he said. “You just have to learn the exact answers to pass the test.” The moment safety goes out the window and laziness is allowed in, peoples' lives are immediately placed in harm's way. Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts and analysis.
Cynthia (US)
@Robert FL Both vessels were headed up stream at the time of the collision. I happen to have been adjacent to both vessels at the time of the accident, though did not see the actual impact.
Charles Tiege (Rochester, MN)
@Robert FL Robert, as you know there are local variants to the universal navigation rules, all collectively known as "rules of the road". There are five sets of navigation rules in US waters alone. Your location dictates which set applies. One US set is "Western River Rules". So maybe there are special rules on the Danube River, too. And if there aren't, maybe there should be?
John (Pittsburgh/Cologne)
If you want a cheap Danube boat ride in Budapest, take the municipal water taxi. I imagine it is also a particularly safe option, because the captains are among the most experienced on that stretch of the river. They sail up and down the same stretch multiple times per day in all types of weather, currents, and boat traffic.
Marty Rowland, Ph.D., P.E. (Forest Hills)
It's the old refrain ... somebody oughtta do something. And when that is said it's likely we are talking about a place that either has no rules, the rules are not being enforced, or the rules are inadequate. In any event, boat traffic in the Danube is effectively subject to a "no property condition" neither private property or public property - only when there are too many boats to fit in the water will people come to their senses. It's like the crazy people waiting in line to reach the summit at Mt. Everest - "no property condition" - keep giving out passes until too many people die.
AC (Chicago)
I'm absolutely amazed by the lack of accountability by the global cruise industry. These massive boats generate incredible amounts of pollution, waste, and carbon emissions. The passengers don't contribute nearly as much to tourism spending as other visitors as they eat most of their meals on the boats. Look what just happened in Venice, now Budapest. What's next? These boats are packed with lazy, uninformed travelers who travel the world for mindless selfies and instagram posts without ever actually learning about the places they visit. They've already ruined many parts of the Caribbean. Sadly, Europe is next.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@AC With all due respect, I take exception to the broad, generalization made. Completely untrue in my case and those fellow travelers we accompanied. Not every river cruise traveler is a "lazy, uninformed traveler who travels the world for mindless selfies and instagram posts without ever actually learning about the places they visit." I do understand and appreciate your sentiment. I don't necessarily disagree in many instances. However, such "across-the-board" harshness is not appreciated nor necessarily true.
John Binkley (NC and FL)
@AC The cruise industry is not unaccountable as you suggest. Cruise ships must adhere to strict international rules and laws including pollution conventions and safety conventions and will be and have been heavily fined if found in violation. As to pollution waste and carbon emissions, modern cruise ships are equipped with very high standard treatment equipment. If the ships didn't exist, the people on them would be on shore and would still be generating waste that would end up being processed, if at all, in a variety of waste treatment plants some of which are of a significantly lower standard and still send their effluent to sea. Thus the net effect of the existence of the cruise industry on pollution is probably positive.
Maxm (Redmond WA)
@AC Ever actually been on such a river trip? We are not talking ocean "cruises" here.
James McNabb (Ottawa, Canada)
The article mentions a capacity of 1000 guests on the "longships". Viking ships hold only slightly more than 200.
Thorsten Fröhlich (Germany)
@James McNabb Indeed, given they only have two cabin levels and most cruise ships fit EU waterways class Vb to fit the Rhine-Main-Danube Canal, which permits ships with 135m length and 11.45m width (only barges may be longer). So the would not even have the floorspace to permit 1000 people!
Maxm (Redmond WA)
@Thorsten Fröhlich Exactly correct - been through the canal on a 192 passenger ship (not Viking)
thomas briggs (longmont co)
I had the privilege of living in Budapest in the late 1990s. Sad to see the Mermaid rising from the bottom of the Danube. In my mind's eye, I can still see the ticket kiosk, dock, and accommodation ladder to the little vessel. Not only did my wife and I take that tour, but we encouraged visitors to take it as well. Orban's government does not offer much comfort, but I hope officials take action to enforce the inland rules of the road to prevent recurrence of this tragedy.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
Profound condolences to those who lost their lives, needlessly, and to their loved ones. Tragic beyond words. A few years back, my husband and I explored the world of these types of cruise ships and I must be honest, what happened on the Danube is NOT the first fatal accident involving Viking. The best and only attractive quality about Viking is their advertising. Whoever choreographs that music, that splendid footage, and that voice is brilliant because that is what sells people. The cruise line we took was smaller, more intimate, and safety was ALWAYS their number one concern and priority. The captain and crew members would greet each passenger when they left the ship in the morning for various excursions, and then would greet us, individually, when we returned in the afternoon and always say with such warmth and sincerity, "Welcome home." They would never leave the port until EVERYONE was accounted for. Certain cruise lines are so focused on profits rather than safety and common sense. Perhaps the way to get their attention and hopefully prevent any future tragedies like this one is to levy huge fines, revoke licenses for a while, and implement rigid, concrete safety policies and procedures NOW rather than down the river. This kind of common sense approach to safety begins with the Captain and then the crew. The fact that the cruise lines tolerates or continued to turn a blind eye is despicable and criminal.
Joanne (Colorado)
@Marge Keller What happened is beyond horrific, and the loss of life—I have no words. Viking has had two awful incidents recently. This one, and the one in Norway (fortunately no loss of life on that one). Having said that, I find it unusual and concerning because of my positive experiences with them where they have made it clear that safety is paramount. Viking has been unfailingly superb in terms of accommodations, customer service, safety drills and reminders, cancelling port stops if the seas are rough, educational opportunities, and extremely informative local guides. I’m sorry your experience with them (I am assuming you actually sailed with them, though you didn’t say so explicitly) was so negative. Here’s to safe sailing, no matter the cruise line.
Salix (Sunset Park, Brooklyn)
A nice example of the "benefits" of de-regulation. Perhaps they are following the Boeing model.
Jim Houghton (Encino Ca)
If everyone knows what they're doing, you can put a lot of boat traffic in one place. If you are a captain involved in a collision, you are no longer a captain. Let's not blame the traffic, let's blame Viking for breaking one of the most basic rules of the sea.
Jerry Engelbach (Mexico)
@Jim Houghton You got that right. An overtaking vessel must give way to the vessel in front.