Senate and House Latest, Confronting Racism in Florida: 12 Days to Go

Oct 25, 2018 · 82 comments
David (California)
While she’s at it, why doesn’t McCaskill go ahead and say the earth is flat and 2 2= anything but 4?? Democrats need to understand that they are on the high ground and should be ready and willing to defend the advantageous position as opposed to campaigning as if they’re fighting uphill. If the only way she can hope to win is by dismissing her Party as left wing wackos, like a common variety Republican would, then she should lose.
Alain James (New York)
@David Democrats - on the "high ground"? You must be joking. Pro-war. Pro-fracking. Pro-voter suppression. Pro-income-inequality. Sounds like the low ground to me.
Jbugko (Pittsburgh, pa)
Trump needs to get a psychological evaluation conducted by a doctors whose nickname isn't "Candyman". This GOP isn't willing to question ANYTHING this birther nationalist does. If it were discovered that Trump himself sent out ten pipe bombs, they would come up with an excuse to justify his actions. Enough is enough. Vote them out.
zula Z (brooklyn)
These are among the most depressing comments in MSM today. Stay home in protest this election, and lose even more than we have.
Fourteen (Boston)
20 million from Bloomberg! He may have just bought my vote.
Vin (NYC)
Thanks for publishing this. And please, NYT, stay on top of this story: it is becoming increasingly clear that Republicans in a Georgia are engaged in heinous voter suppression and fraud. If this indeed happens, and there are no consequences, we are truly done for. Our institutions are under tremendous stress, and the theft of an election is the nail in the coffin. Georgia is, pardon the mixed metaphors, the canary in the coal mine for these crooks. I know that the next “shiny object” is what the media tends to focus on in these hyperspeed news cycles, but you guys owe it to the public to stay on top of this story to completion. This is important.
Mal Stone (New York)
Any person who claims to be a Democrat who urges you to vote third party because the Democrat running is not pure enough is not someone you should listen to. McCaskill, for one, is reliably pro choice in a state where most voters are pro life. But centrism in this country has become a bad word. I am more liberal than McCaskill but I am not running in Missouri either.
Kristin (Houston, TX)
of all the things about this administration that make me angry, and there are many, what makes me angriest is that Trump is campaigning and endorsing for Republican candidates using our tax dollars.
Jay Orchard (Miami Beach)
The party that stands to benefit the most from early voting is the GOP. Why? Because more votes that are cast early for the GOP candidates, means less votes that would have gone to the GOP but instead will go the Democrats because of stupid, outrageous and insulting statements by President Trump that he is sure to make between now and Nov. 6.
Ncrdbl1 (BBQ capital of the World)
@Jay Orchard Early voting reports show that GOP voters are turning out in large number for early voting. Knox County in Tennessee is strongly GOP and about half the population of Shelby County(Memphis) which is heavily democrat. Early numbers show that there have been almost the same number of early votes cast in both counties. Other states are reporting the same thing in their early voting.
Rene Pedraza (Potomac, Maryland)
@Jay Orchard I’m a Democrat and went to early vote today. Chatting up my fellow voters I heard from plenty of Red folks feeling oh so blue about the state of affairs in this Trump climate of chicanery and false inflated found less bravado. The community center I voted in was overrun with people. I have never gone voting - even on the assigned voting date of the last presidential election and witnessed such throngs of impassioned voters. This election without question is indeed the most important election of our lifetimes. Either we recover our basic allegiance to truth and the very real moral morass this enfant terrible has led our collective destinies into for the sole pleasure of his banal twisted, and psychotically malformed ego. It’s understandzble why so many equally uneducated and intellectually deficient masses adore him. He makes them feel loved, understood, and above all offers them a sanctuary to legitimize their own wildly paranoid souls so desperate to be told that they hold the truth in their hands. Let us hope those who are truly educated and learned and see the world outside the confines of these miscreant’s tiny universes of loathing and hate come out and vote to salvage what we can out of the global and domestic devastation this Category five Hurricane Trump has wrought through the daily evisceration of our highest visions for this once civilized land.
Fourteen (Boston)
- not “one of those crazy Democrats” This is an excellent strategy I'd like to see more of - whatever works on the ground. Of course a Progressive could say the exact same thing.
Brannon Perkison (Dallas, TX)
Am I the only one who thinks we really need a viable third party? This hyper-partisanship is preventing anything constructive from getting done. We need representation that can swing-vote legislation based on logic and popular opinion, not party divisions.
W.A. Spitzer (Faywood, NM)
@Brannon Perkison...."Am I the only one who thinks we really need a viable third party?"....I sure hope so. Third parties only work when you have a parliamentary system where two or more parties can get together to form the government. In a presidential system as in the U.S. having a third party is a near guarantee that their will be a minority government. And very likely the least representative option because the third party is most likely to split the vote of what would otherwise have been the favored party..
Deus (Toronto)
@Brannon Perkison Correct, however, that does not deal with the most important problem in that powerful corporations and lobbyists are free to buy politicians whom ultimately strictly serve their interests, not the citizens.
TopOfThHill (Brooklyn)
I have felt the same for a long time. We need a third -- and forth and fifth -- party, for example like France. Unfortunately, we treat any semblance of a third party as "a spoiler" for the stranglehold we currently have.
Douglas (Minnesota)
The idea that there are Democrats who are "left wing" would be utterly ridiculous if we were discussing the political spectrum in any Western democracy other than the U.S. In the rest of the developed Western world, actual socialists and even (shock, horror!) communists are normal parts of the political puzzle. And even frankly conservative political factions accept, e.g., universal healthcare and strong unions as necessary and generally beneficial. Only here, where we have had, for decades, what is effectively a one-party system with two right wings, could use of the term "left wing" to describe Democrats not provoke widespread hearty laughter.
Gary F.S. (Oak Cliff, Texas)
There are a few words that I think can describe Sens. McCaskill and Donnelly: complete lack of integrity come to mind. To the Democratic consultocracy, attacking one's own party is considered savvy even though it never actually works. Why would the voters of Indiana and North Dakota eat chicken in a Democrat's house when they can have steak in a Republican's? Most voters are not so clueless that they can't see through the bluff. They correctly see McCaskill & Donnelly's political rhetoric as feckless and lacking integrity. I was on a conference call several years back with muckety-mucks from the Bill White for Texas Governor campaign listening to consultant insist that they couldn't "nationalize" the race. Like it was still 1982. I knew then White would lose. Every race is nationalized today and voters intuit a candidate's beliefs on the basis of partisan ID regardless of their "messaging." McCaskill & Donnelly can run, but they can't hide. It would be better if they actually stood for something un-apologetically rather than offer voters a cornucopia of feel-good vague. We have enough empty suits in the U.S. Senate.
Deus (Toronto)
@Gary F.S. McCaskill and Donnelly are the "poster children" for establishment democrats whose only interest they serve are those of their donors and will say or do anything to keep their jobs. There are reasons why that within the last ten years the democrats have lost almost 1000 seats at the state and federal levels with Republicans now controlling two-thirds of the states and all THREE executive branches of the government. McCaskill and Donnelly are just two of them.
Ed Watters (San Francisco)
"Some moderate (and vulnerable) Democrats have distanced themselves from left-wing elements in their own party." One of those "moderates", Donnelly, proudly announced that he voted to fund Trump's border wall. Sorry, but "moderate" sounds a lot like Republican - and he votes with repubs more than Dems. It's time to get rid of the Rahm Emmanuel-Democrats. They're useless for the purpose of turning this country around.
Steve C (Boise, Idaho)
It became clear some time ago that the Democratic Party, as represented by its "centrists," will not help the poor, the working and middle classes. Donnelly's and McCaskill's running away from the progressive part of the party that does care about the poor, the working and middle classes confirms how useless "centrist" Democrats can be for the people who need them most. Yes, I know. Politicians have to adjust to the beliefs of their constituents. But there's a difference between pandering to those beliefs and showing their constituents some ideas which would better their lives. The "centrist" Democrats long ago gave up on showing a better way -- including Medicare for All, free college tuition, a $15 minimum wage, strong labor unions, confronting climate change, -- and settled for pandering.
Ncrdbl1 (BBQ capital of the World)
@Steve C New Reports this week showed the Middle Class earned more money this past year under the Trump tax plan than in anytime in US history. 4 Million have been lifted off the food stamp roles.
Alain James (New York)
It is awesome to read that some "Democrats" wish to distance themselves from what they read are "left-wing" positions - because they think that will help them win. The exact opposite is true. By turning their backs on progressive values, they are in fact offering no alternative to their Republican opponents. So voters don't show up. And they lose. The Democrats have learned absolutely nothing from the debacle of 2016. And I have no sympathy for them. Only contempt.
W.A. Spitzer (Faywood, NM)
@Alain James.....Did you know that Romney, who lost in Wisconsin to Obama in 2012, had more votes than Trump who won in Wisconsin in 2016. Do you know why? Because a lot of Bernie progressives didn't show up to vote. Seems to me it is the progressives that did not learn anything. The bottom line is that a progressive can talk to and work for change with a moderate Democrat. Whereas with a Republican they won't get the time of day. The problem with progressives is that unless they learn how to count they will never make any progress.
Alain James (New York)
@W.A. Spitzer When you are willing to confront the corruption of the DNC, and what they did to undermine the Sanders campaign, let's talk.
ebmem (Memphis, TN)
Could someone please explain how it happens that state Democrat officials have reason to believe that there are 4700 mail in applications for absentee votes that have been lost? Have 4700 citizens notified the Democrats that they mailed in a request for an absentee ballot and have not received an absentee ballot? Or did the paid solicitors for the Democrats distribute 4700 mail in applications and only 48 were actually mailed in by the citizens, even though the solicitors were paid for 4700? Or, did the solicitors collect 4700 mail in applications, mail them on Monday, 10/22 and are now complaining that only 84 have been processed by 10/25?
David Gregory (Blue in the Deep Red South)
I am a veteran and Claire McCaskill has done nothing to help veterans worthy of a recommendation. Bernie Sanders has done many things for Vets and she endorsed Hillary Clinton over Bernie- an unforgivable sin that brought us President Donald J Trump. Yes, I went there. I care not if she wins or loses, for she is at best a nominal Democrat and might as well switch parties. She can take Manchin with her.
W.A. Spitzer (Faywood, NM)
@David Gregory......"I care not if she wins or loses".....So that means you prefer Trump. Great. Just great.
David Gregory (Blue in the Deep Red South)
@W.A. Spitzer Trump is not running for the Senate from Missouri. That is quite a leap to make such an accusation. No, I do not like Mr Trump nor did I vote for him.
Alex (Phoenix, AZ)
Lots of noise. Just vote! Reading this stuff is so discouraging. I already sent in my early voting ballot by mail.
Steven of the Rockies ( Colorado)
In light of the last two wretched years of American History, any viable Democrat might focus on A) reversing corporation tax cuts B) passing current, well thought out legislation to protect Veterans, Social Security for those 65 and older, eliminate the Slavery Era Electoral college, which renders useless the votes of millions of American voters. C) Consult the Mayo Clinic, Harvard Medical School, Stanford Medical School, and Johns Hopkins Medical School to rewrite the Affordable Health Care Act and pass it in Congress. And D) it might be a intelligent idea to drop any conversations about Bernie Sanders, abortion, and Gay Rights, until a viable Democratic Congress is able to rebuild bridges, highways, and schools, remove automatic weapons of war from our streets, and pass legislation which blocks legal actions against gun manufacturers, and the NRA.
Kathy (Oxford)
If you can't win by your platform, you might as well cheat. As Republicans lose ground by gerrymandering and false advertising they are running out of legal cheating and now are resorting to illegal cheating because going to court will happen after the election and unless intent can be proved they have still won the election. Honesty, for our nation's lawmakers, is not always their best policy. Getting in and staying in is what matters, the so-called big picture. Well, that and self-enrichment. Everything is at stake for Republicans, literally their future, so it seems they're pulling out all the stops, daring voters to not just catch them at it but stop them. Without brazen cheating it would likely be their end of rule for a while. Give up all those tasty power and perks? For honesty and transparency? Hardly. The fun part when even cheating can't save them will be watching all those toadying legislators swear to every holy microphone they were never a Trump supporter.
Larry Eisenberg (Medford, MA.)
With apologies to G & S’s Disagreeable Man. My name is Brian Kemp, Georgia’s Secretary of State I have to register voters, a task I truly hate, I like to keep ‘em all white, no fraud will then ensue And yet I am impartial, no voter will I screw, I’m running for the Governor, they want me to recuse And keep me from rejecting votes? There’s no way, I refuse, I’m using every trick I know to make sure that I win, If I should lose it means that a black Woman did get in, And I don’t know why.
Ncrdbl1 (BBQ capital of the World)
@Larry Eisenberg The voter registration hold ups are being done by the local election board and NOT at the state level. Most have errors that must be corrected. But AGAIN all of this is being done at the LOCAL level and NOT on the state level. the county in question above Kalb is 70% minority and is ran by democrats. The local election board holding up these registrations are DEMOCRATS.
ebmem (Memphis, TN)
@Larry Eisenberg Kemp implemented a process in which individuals getting new or renewal drivers licenses would automatically be registered to vote. This has resulted in the number of registered votes being higher than at any time in history. Does he get credit for increasing voter registration? No. The Democrats contend that some 4700 people made mail in requests for absentee ballots, and only 48 actually got absentee ballots, but cannot name a single one of the 4652 individuals who didn't get an absentee ballot. Something is off in the lawsuit.
Nostradamus Said So (Midwest)
I have not seen any Democratic "mobs" yelling "Lock Him Up" at rallies. Have not seen Democrats removing republican black senior citizens from buses providing rides to voting places. Have not seen voter registrations (predominately black & non republican) being purged or declared invalid for "stupid" reasons in Democratic cities, counties or states. So what party is trying to control the country like a dictatorship with a one leader rule? Not the Democrats! Armed White men confronted a Black volunteer at a voting place...they were not Democrats. But you can't slap these trump base ignoramuses up side the head with the facts....doesn't do any good. They just say "duh".
lkent (boston)
@Nostradamus Said So These hardcore are violent people and they alone are his "base", they alone are "loyal" to him above all else, including their nation and their communities. Reach out to them with soft words and they will leap at your jugular to tear out your throat. Remain silent and they will leap at your jugular to tear out your throat. Call them what they are and they will leap at your jugular to tear out your throat. Even without the powerful calling for impeachment,, here is where we have arrived: One butchered reporter of a newspaper named often and libeled by Trump as his enemy -- by a Prince who must have known that Trump would defend his highness, praise him, as in fact trump has -- predictably. One more congratulations to a trump cultist who knew he'd incur only trump's praise, never disapprobation, for assaulting a reporter. CNN named as the "enemy" 21 months ago, followed by a "presidential statement" of a cartoon showing the enemy being beaten up by trump, has received a bomb. And the foiled murderers defended by trump as "angry" at his enemy. Freedom itself his enemy., his and his cultists' true target. Democratic elected officials and the most influential of the Press have been feeble w/ tsk-tsk responses to trump's calls to violence against his Him-defined treasonous enemies, all who oppose him inc. you and I, with the bomb recipients having been named by name by him. Time to say it, in vain or not: His words are High Crimes: IMPEACH.
ziqi92 (Santa Rosa)
Let the red state Democrats do what they need to do to hold onto their seats. Left wing progressives will already vote for them, but they need swing voter support to put them on top. This election will be close, but if Latino and millenial turnout spike, then Democrats will outnumber Republicans in all critical races, rendering all polls irrelevant because those two groups answer pollster calls at a far lower rate.
EGD (California)
And all of these Dems, except for Manchin, voted in lockstep with the extremists to destroy Kavanaugh as part of a deliberately false and malicious character assassination campaign. Democrats simply can no longer be trusted or be decent.
Carol Davis (Fairbanks, AK)
@EGD"extremists to destroy Kavanaugh as a part of a deliberately false and malicious character assassination campaign". You have your opinion, what evidence do you have? I agree with my (R) Senator Lisa Murkowski that Kavanaugh was not SCOTUS material because of his temperament that he exhibited while being under oath in front of the Senate. Klobuchar gave him a chance to deny an allegation made against him; his response, if the situation had happened in HIS court, would have earned him a swift Contempt of Court. His opening statement demonstrated his serious lack of judicial temperament.
Kathy (Oxford)
@EGD If a Supreme Court nominee can't handle tough questions with grace and courage do we want him as final arbiter of our nation's laws? So even if you're right about falsehoods, he still failed miserably. It was Republicans that chose speed rather than substance.
bse (vermont)
@EGD I'm not sure there even is a list of decent Republicans anymore. Marching in lockstep with Trump pretty much took care of decent Republicans. All Democrats do not march in lockstep with the progressive wing, which we see reported in the news every day. I think it is a good thing that Democrats stand for mostly the same things, but at various levels of commitment. That's okay, as they represent different constituents, some more conservative than others. that used to be part of the greatness of the Democratic party, the big tent, the squabbles, etc. Bring it back so the people can see that all issues aren't as simple as Trump tells the Trumpists they are. Fewer lies, too! Vote blue on Nov. 6!
Erica Smythe (Minnesota)
I know Florida and while Florida residents are fair minded people, they're not anywhere near ready to vote in a Marxist loving Democratic Socialist. They moved to Florida to avoid high taxes. They're not about to vote in someone that destroys itself. And if I'm wrong, we can hold out FL as an example for the rest of the country; just as CA has served the past 20 years. I'm not sure what's going to happen to the worst public school system in the nation when a million legal residents leave and another 2 million illegal immigrants move in, but I'm sure the 10% tax on personal and corporate income can quickly get bounced to 15-20%, especially if it means giving teachers 5% bumps in their pension and pay each year.
Sarah (Arlington, VA)
@Erica Smythe The worst public school systems in the nations are mostly in red states, while the best are mostly in blue states. And not California, but Louisiana is #50. The US in general is in the bottom third and even quarter of the PISA tests of all OECD in reading, math and science. Difference is that in those nations that fare much better, teachers loving their profession don't pay school material out of pocket, but have much higher salaries. Furthermore, teachers in other countries need a masters degree in subject they are teaching in high-schools that run from grade 6 through 12, and many have a Ph.D. in their field to boot.
ebmem (Memphis, TN)
@Sarah Teachers in the countries you love are paid lower salaries than American public school teachers, as are their medical professionals. Facts matter. Americans pay twice as much per capita for public education and get poorer outcomes. We also pay twice as much for medical care, but at least our outcomes are better.
Pdxtran (Minneapolis)
If your campaign is "I'm not like those other crazy far-left Democrats," then you are effectively bad-mouthing your own party and saying that the Republicans have the right idea. That's in addition to the fact that no current elected official, not even Bernie Sanders, is to the left of FDR.
DC (Philadelphia)
@Pdxtran It is really no different than the Republicans who look to enjoy some of the advantages of having a Republican president but also distancing themselves from the more inflammatory things Trump is saying and doing. Ultimately to be successful as a politician and to stay in office or advance to higher levels you have to be able to help both sides to some degree. Being completely to one side or the other does not work long term. Keep Roe vs. Wade, keep protections for LGBTs, keep a national healthcare program, protect Social Security, but also protect our borders/do a much better job of managing immigration, don't tax the heck out of corporations and individuals, maintain a strong military, keep a capitalist based society, do something about the infrastructure, etc. You have to help both sides.
Pdxtran (Minneapolis)
@DC: "Don't tax the heck out of corporations and individuals, maintain a strong military"?-- We have some of the least taxed rich people in the industrialized world. Any corporation that pays the "list price" for taxes has a lousy accounting staff. How strong does the U.S. military have to be? At the moment, it is stronger than the militaries of the next several biggest-spending countries *combined.* It is far beyond actual defensive needs and for most of my six decades has been used almost entirely in attempts to impose America's will on other countries. And it's the children of the working class, not the children of the planners of these arrogant ventures, who die in the naive belief that they're "serving their country." You're asking the Democrats to coast on their previous accomplishments but not to make any bold proposals that might offend the Republicans. Note that the Republicans NEVER hesitate to make bold proposals, and in case you haven't noticed, they control most of the state legislatures, both houses of Congress, the White House, and now, the Supreme Court. Voters have to be able to tell the difference between the two parties.
Sarah (Arlington, VA)
@Pdxtran You are confusing our arch-right wingers with facts. As naturalized citizen from oh-so-supposedly socialist Europe, I always considered the Democratic Party smack in the centre of the political spectrum. Democrats compared to Republicans have moved very little, while the latter have now arrived in goose step at the abyss of fascism.
MisterE (New York, NY)
I think campaigning on local issues primarily, rather than on the basis of ideological absolutes, is generally the right way to go. Applying progressive litmus tests to Democratic candidates is a prescription for disaster, the disaster being the consolidation of Trump's power through an extension of the GOP's grip on the legislature. But there's a limit. Can we please find better candidates than Donnelly and Manchin, Republicans in Democratic garb who serve their own interest -- reelection to a post they fill for their own benefit -- instead of serving the greater good of the nation? Anybody who supports Trumpism is unworthy of a vote, and the party is better off without him. Retaining his seat does no more good than if a Republican held it, since a turncoat Democrat votes as a Republican would anyway.
Howard Winet (Berkeley, CA)
While commentators and comedians take the ad hominum path, invigorating Trump's tribal supporters, Republican commentators play on fears about core issues that concern non-Democrats who care about their problems more than Trump's personality. McCaskill fears a surprise in the midterms that Democrats refuse to consider. I would not be surprised if the "flip" is a flop.
Covert (Houston tx)
Democrats should ignore Trump completely and define themselves by doing something positive. They should go out, and help hurricane victims rebuild or something.
WiseGuy (MA)
Both going to lose ..
MR (Around Here)
Regarding DeSantis, I've made the same point about Trump: being a Trump supporter doesn't mean you're a racist, but it does mean that racism isn't a deal-breaker for you. And in the end, what's the difference?
donald carlon (denver)
@MR Sorry , but Yes it certainly does appear to be part of the Nationalist movement that both trump and desantis give support too /period .
Ami (California)
@MR...the mere (and constant) accusation of racism (about all things, all events, all outcomes - real or imagined or 'possible') in no way proves racism. That is the difference and that is why "racism" is not a deal breaker for many people. And it shouldn't be.
Philip S. Wenz (Corvallis, Oregon)
People get ready and pay attention. There is already talk — from the White House — of Trump trying to nullify the midterm results should the Democrats win the house. (He's being backed by Russian trolls who are already calling the election results illegitimate.) His plan is to say swarms of illegals voted, then declare victory for the Republicans. In the ensuing constitutional crisis, he would try to completely reverse the election results. This doesn't come from me or some online conspiracy theorists. It comes from veteran White House reporter Carl Bernstein: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-2018-election-illegitimate-democra... What can you do? Send this information to everyone you know. Expose it now, so the White House will have to go into bunker mode and abandon its plan.
EGD (California)
@Philip S. Wenz Oh, so there’s ‘talk.’ Let’s call it what it is: paranoid, hyperbolic nonsense.
Philip S. Wenz (Corvallis, Oregon)
@EGD The "talk" comes from the White House, not me or random sources. Go read the quote from Bernstein in the Newsweek article. The "paranoid" in this situation is Con Man Don — and he has good reason to be frightened if the House begins real, as opposed to faux investigations into his nefarious business dealings.
donald carlon (denver)
@EGD This is why the republican party is being voted from office both California and Colorado . thier will not any republicans office holder in either state in the future /and the future starts Nov 6th .
Teddi (Oregon)
The Democrats need to start supporting middle class families. When you hear from them, which isn't often, it is for the LBGTQ community, immigrants or women's issues. These are all very important, but the middle class has been left out. No wonder they are turning to the only party that is at least acknowledging them. Bernie is the only candidate that was wildly popular, but no one in the party has picked up on why that was. He was all about jobs and education. We need new leadership in the Democratic Party. No, let me rephrase that - we need leadership in the Democratic Party. We currently have none.
Jody Colander (Pittsboro NC)
@Teddi When are people going to stop thinking of "women's issues" as a fringe group? Women make up 50.8% of the population of this country. Women's issues are middle class issues. Women's issues are issues, period.
Linda Miilu (Chico, CA)
@Teddi Bernie might have been "wildly" popular in his local venues; he was that nationally. I would love to see free education up through university; universal basic health care; a living wage guaranteed by a decent minimum wage; repair and maintenance of valuable infrastructure, across State lines. I regret the recent installation of a Catholic ideologue on the Supreme Court, confirmed by a GOP Congress. Bernie is too old to accomplish what we need. He is also compromised by all that "Independent Socialist" baggage. He had a lot to do with a bunch of kids who stormed a Convention on his behalf. Hillary Clinton was qualified, established, known here and abroad, respected by those women whose benefits she fought for, and would have brought a master pol, Bill Clinton, with her. The kids who surrounded her managed a terrible campaign. So, the take away is that there need to adults in the room, political mentors who have been through a few campaigns, who know the art of the possible. Passion is needed; however, all politics is local. Get out the vote by recognizing what is important in local venues, and campaign on those issues. Ted Kennedy was another master pol. Both Kennedy and Clinton knew how to walk the street, talk with people, and listen to them. Big rallies are like Nascar races. Town Halls are real forums. I attended many in CT.
jonathan (decatur)
@Teddi, actually they all talk about health care not any of the other issues you raise. You are significantly misinformed.
Not Amused (New England)
To date I have ONLY seen Republicans tied - in any way - to voter suppression efforts, interactions with white supremacist and other hate groups, and efforts to divide members of non-white communities. Maybe Democrats have also been guilty of these types of ties, I don't know...but I haven't seen them. Whether Republicans deny the obvious visuals from such ties, or hedge on their answers when asked, it is the GOP that needs to be confronted - and harshly and often - for the various unhinged and deplorable activities in which they engage (and yes, "deplorable" was purposefully chosen for this comment) and for the false messages containing outright lies to disavowals of demonstrably provable negative tactics, beliefs, and desires that are the hallmark of the modern Republican. The real question of the 2018 midterm elections is, do you want a racist, sexist, corrupt America from 1950...or do you want to see if we as a nation can move one inch closer to achieving the vision of equality and mutual respect contained within our Constitution. Corruption or Constitution. That's the choice this year.
kraidstar (Maine)
@Not Amused The conservatives want a return to 1950? More like a return to the 1860's.
Not Amused (New England)
@kraidstar right you are...I was trying to be kind
c harris (Candler, NC)
McCaskill's strategy has all the earmarking of the 2014 Democratic strategy that cost them the Senate. She wants to hide behind the notion that left Democrats are really pro Russian and want to socialize everything. This open split can only help the Republicans. The Trump boom will soon be seen as a laisse faire train wreck which voters will be trying to escape. But for now the economy will continue to seem in good shape and help Republicans. Trump's idiotic rude bigoted behavior will not be punished. McCaskill's strategy it would seems shows a clear sense of desperation on her part. The Democrats need to move onto to new leadership.
Linda Miilu (Chico, CA)
@c harris I can't speak for McCaskill. However, I can speak as a Democrat who has voted for many decades. My parents took me to a country school house near my grandfather's ranch to vote for Truman; they taught me that voting was really important. They were the FDR generation; they had been through a world war and a Depression. As I recall my history, FDR was also accused of being a "Socialist"; he was, if Social Security is socialism. Truman was accused of being a "Socialist"; he was, if Medicare is socialism. The Democratic Party believes in The Social Contract which includes all citizens and their well being. It does not include adversaries, as is Putin and the Russian financiers who have bankrolled Trump. FDR did not do business with Krupp. Truman did not do business with Mao. Trump does business with Putin, and with the bloody 7thC sheiks in Saudi Arabia. He is a transactional failed businessman, a propagandist, a con man. I can't watch or listen to him; he is cringe making on so many levels.
Susanna (South Carolina)
@Linda Miilu Medicare was brought to us by yet another New Dealer, Lyndon Baines Johnson. Otherwise I agree entirely.
ebmem (Memphis, TN)
@Linda Miilu Medicare was not created, along with Medicaid, until the mid 1960's. Truman, who was president from 1947-1953, had nothing to do with it. The Russians bankrolled Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Secretary of State. She coincidentally approved the sale of Uranium One to Russian oligarchs. Truman abandoned Eastern Europe to the USSR and abandoned China to Mao.
Zonker (Richmond, VA)
One thing is for sure ... Joe Donnelly has no idea how to swing an ax.
Lydia (Arlington)
I'm ok with incumbants who choose to distance themselves from the left-wing elements of the party. What this country needs are good solid centrists who know how to play well with others and vote on the issues. What we don't need is what we have right now.
donald carlon (denver)
@Lydia The radical elements our the republican party /period Signed an Independent voters against trump .
Bennett (Olympia, WA)
@Lydia I disagree. In some cases we need centrists, and in the future we will need centrists. But at this particular time, we need more populists on the Left who actually stand for something, will use plain-speak to convey those positions to ordinary people, and will aggressively take down Republicans. In the 2020 presidential election Democrats need an attack dog, someone not afraid to get down in the mud with tRump. If we put up a centrist who will only "go high" we will lose again.
Pdxtran (Minneapolis)
@Lydia: Left or centrist, we need candidates who understand their local voters and what issues will move them.
anna gilbert (west point, ny)
Why does the Times continue to provide free media time to Trump. Do you really need to have a picture of him at the top of the article?
Patrick Borunda (Washington)
@anna gilbert I couldn't agree more. The NYT made another historic blunder (not the first in its history) during the run up to 2016 by its (non) coverage of the Sanders campaign and its hysterical harping on those profoundly inconsequential emails. Stop with the breathless coverage of every dumb thing that comes out of Trump's mouth or off his teeny-tiny fingers. Button Mushroom's tweets are not the most important story out there right now...voter suppression may be. How many column inches of real information could have been fit into the hole created for the photograph of the orange thing? Might be important to calculate that before it's too late for us all.
Roger Hochman (houston,tx)
These are scary times.......reporters being body slammed by politicians (our president not only approves, but lauds this act)......Key democratic figures receiving bombs in the mail (our president blames the press, after he has repeatedly villified these folks)..... PLEASE vote on November 6th - we MUST send a message to Washington. I fear that if the right side wins, it will be a mandate for Trump and then times will get even scarier.
A.A.F. (New York)
Politicians split parties, spilt America and split voters and never the twain shall meet. We have a totally pathetic and dysfunctional political system in this country in which all Americans, voters /non voters and future generations will inevitably pay the price for. Politicians do a great job when it comes to personal attacks, rhetoric and division. However, they dramatically fail to do what they were elected to do, serving their country and the American people.
njglea (Seattle)
Polls, polls, polls. Predictions, predictions, predictions. Since when did the media decide THEY have a right to try to "call" elections? That has caused many of the problems. I worked for a major newspaper publisher that did market research as a tool for advertisers and learned one thing - people lie. Many said they shopped at Nordstrom and the numbers were so skewed that it couldn't be true. They just wanted to seem like they were "in". Stop the polls and predictions, media, and start doing your job - like reporting that the stock markets around the world are crashing. That's reality.
Naomi Fein (New York City)
@njglea The Times reported on the stock market on the front page of today's hard copy. Polls are not predictions; they are attempts to evaluate voters' positions. The media have not tried to call elections. They are doing their job: reporting on the news, reporting on what's happening. I don't understand why you think any media organization should stop reporting on one aspect of the news. Why do you think this would be a good thing? Why is it a bad thing? I don't get your reasoning.