Russian Trolls Used Vaccine Debate to Sow Discord, Study Finds

Aug 23, 2018 · 81 comments
Jonathan Katz (St. Louis)
Debate? What debate? There is no debate. Vaccines prevent illness and death.
Donna Gray (Louisa, Va)
It continues to astound me that many NYT readers choose to believe scientific evidence regarding global warming but then to ignore an even greater consensus of scientists regarding the safety of vaccines.
Wolfe (Wyoming)
I am absolutely stunned. This article is about Russian trolls sowing discord. And how do at least 2/3 of the commenters react? Bu sowing more discord! Does no one care that the Russians are trying to turn us against each other? It seems that some of us are so addicted to hate and the accompanying adrenaline rush, that we can’t read anything and respond sensibly. The Russians are winning.
John Brews ..✅✅ (Reno NV)
Social media, search engines, blogs, ads - there are so many ways the web can be used for rabble rousing. And when making a profit dominates those who might address these ills, their cure is out of reach.
Gluscabi (Dartmouth, MA)
Judging from the viscerally held, black and white responses to the vaccine issue, Russians picked a prime topic for sowing discord. Even the allegedly "above-average-intelligence" subscribers to the august NYT are easy bait for an up or down argument regarding vaccines and are in no mood for nuance or thoughtful commentary. For example, the leading comment by MB claims "There is no debate, only misinformation that seeks to obscure the science on vaccine effectiveness." Not much room for discussion here even though critics of mandatory vaccines for infants and young children seldom if ever doubt "vaccine effectiveness." MB has taken an adversarial position against an adversary that does not exist ... and other readers have given MB their resounding approval. The doubts about vaccines have more to do with their potential for harm. Critics agree the potential harm could fall to a statistically small number of children. However, for those children and those families the potential harm is life-altering. Infants are routinely vaccinated at eight months with a trifecta of vaccines -- MMR. Interestingly, for these infants, there are no easily determined contraindications listed by the CDC. Why is that? Every other medicine lists precautions. Shouldn’t the MMR vaccine do the same? Why not one vaccine at a time? Vaccines are life-savers -- for individuals and entire populations. However, let's not unnecessarily, cruelly sacrifice some infants for the "greater good."
Jonathan Katz (St. Louis)
@Gluscabi It does. The only counterindication is known allergy to one of the ingredients. Rare.
Dr. Conde (Medford, MA.)
I hope that Russians are learning about what their government is doing in the U.S. and in Europe in their name. Do Russians pay taxes? Do they have any say in what their government does, or are they ever the ignorant serfs of czars and dictators? Is this what they want their military and government to spend their money on? Creating factories of lies and sowing discord among the people of Western nations, fixing elections like Putin's must have also been? Invading other countries and telling lies on the internet seems to be Russia's main exports these days. Are Russians proud of relying on the computers and software of other nations instead of actually creating the technologies of the future that would help their nation and their world? There are many reasons to be ashamed of our current administration, but I wonder how ordinary Russians feel knowing that their government can't actually provide the jobs, salaries, technology, and standard of living of Western countries, and so has to rely on spoiling other lands through spying, bugging, and botting and trolling?
Jonathan Katz (St. Louis)
@Dr. Conde They are not ignorant, but they are serfs with no power.
Stephen Rifkin (North Adams, MA)
Wasn't our President opposed to vaccines? As I recall, he thought they were responsible for autism in children.
Nasty Curmudgeon fr. (Boulder Creek, Calif.)
All you waif-flowers, (Flower waifes?) can get vaccinated for everything & then some Me, I just expose my system to gradually increasing amounts of the various things that ail people: poison oak (I can now pull it out of the ground as climbs upward or just coming out of the ground on the side of the road); rusty skin-piercing objects and daily, if not hourly dirt related (dirty) injuries (tetanus exposure); meat-bees, aka wasps, instead of “owee” (ouch), it’s “Oh, are you actually stinging me, softly, as I dig up your nest under a slab of cement & put the fire and gasoline to it! (Honeybees are far & few, ‘cause there’s definitely colony collapse)
Syd (Hamptonia, NY)
You must be blessed with the strength of ten men!
Tiana (Jakarta)
Have you read about Indonesia's measles rubella vaccine debate? Hardliners argue that the vaccine is not acceptable in Islam rule (haram) as the medium is using pork, insisting they won't vaccinate their children until the acceptable (halal) vaccine is finally invented--despite the real medical risks they'll put to pregnant mothers and their babies. And the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) has issued a statement that the measles rubella vaccine contains haram substance, but Muslims may use it. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/08/21/mr-vaccine-contains-haram-... I hope they're all just Russian trolls because it is so embarrassing to have your country debate over superficial things, halal/haram thing is ridiculously trivial when the risks are real and might affect others. Not even the Middle East coutry make an issue out of it.
Al (Idaho)
I continue to be stunned by the inability of Americans to think critically and sort thru information. Is this due to a failing of our education system, the prevalence of social media being treated as an actual information/news source or what? You don't have to be a medical researcher to find legitimate, understandable information on say vaccines or other controversial topics. I thought the "Information Age" was upon us with the coming of the Internet. If it's possible, people seem even less well informed than in the past, while being even more convinced of their opinions. An informed, educated, open minded public is the key to a function democracy- no wonder were in trouble.
John Brews ..✅✅ (Reno NV)
Hey, Wikipedia is the major source of “information”, an “encyclopedia” edited by anyone, run mainly by men in their early 20’s, and whose main contributors are zealots, not scholars.
Professor (Omaha)
Where are her gloves?
Jean (Vancouver)
@Professor Gloves are not required by OHSA “Gloves are usually not necessary when administering intramuscular or subcutaneous injections as long as bleeding that could result in hand contact with blood or OPIM is not anticipated, according to Enforcement Procedures for the Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens." http://blogs.hcpro.com/osha/2012/01/ask-the-expert-gloves-for-injections/ I think you are worried (I may be wrong), that somehow the healthcare worker is putting the patient at risk. This is highly unlikely if sterile equipment and technique is used. Healthcare workers generally wash their hands before doing these procedures. The healthcare worker may be at risk if they have an open skin lesion that came into contact with the patient's blood. Usually vaccine injections do not result in any blood, and the protocol is usually to put a sterile swap on the puncture immediately after withdrawing the needle, and then put a small bandage on it. Don't worry!
Al (Idaho)
@Jean. I'm in health care. I make them wear gloves. Can't hurt, might help.
Jean (Vancouver)
@Al I must admit that seems like overkill to me. The biggest danger would be a needle stick injury and gloves will do nothing to mitigate that.
math365 (CA)
Nearly 100% of Russian children are vaccinated not because their parents are more educated. It's because they have no choice in a Communist Regime. We here in the United States allow one to make a choice, no matter how ill-informed that choice may be. The science is clear, however, vaccinations lead to a healthier life and most certainly are not correlated to Autism.
Andre (Novosibirsk,Russia)
@math365 This is the main advantage of communism. People are provided with truthful information, and lies are forbidden.
Liz (Raleigh)
@math365 Russia isn't a Communist country. That was the Soviet Union.
Blake (State College, PA)
There is no "vaccine debate." There is the truth (vaccines work) and there is ignorance (which will never believe the truth regardless of evidence). That's hardly a "debate."
Davide (Pittsburgh)
Perhaps under-appreciated is that not all of the unvaccinated who survive measles virus infection are made whole again. One of my great-uncles, who lived to be 97, survived the influenza pandemic of 1918 and dodged tuberculosis, an untreatable scourge in his day, but as a child suffered measles encephalitis which left him totally blind, unemployable and house-bound for the rest of his long life.
JS (Chicago, IL)
What a great way to weaken your enemy, cause an epidemic. From now on anti-vax advocates are not just stupid, they are a national security threat and should be handled appropriately.
Twiggs987 (Usa)
@JS This is the kind of rhetoric the Russians wanted to instill. Anti-vaxxers aren't the enemy. And, attacking them won't convince them of anything. Let's focus on what we have in common first and then focus on what is different. We all want to be safe, free, respected, and for our children to have a great future. We just don't agree on how to get there. But, that is okay. Let's use reason and empathy when dealing with the "other" side. Let's all just be Americans together again.
Andre Hoogeveen (Burbank, CA)
Beautifully stated. This is exactly the type of sensible approach we should be using for every point of disagreement.
Kiljoy616 (Miami)
@Twiggs987 Attacking them or not they are dangerous to American society. This is the facts and not doing anything about it will only lead to worse outcomes.
Mat (Kerberos)
I don’t need Boris to convince me that anti-vaxxers are dangerous narcissistic children, I knew it already.
Dawn (New Orleans)
The Russian trolls are exploiting the general lack of understanding about science that was first generated when Dr Wakefield reported MMR caused Autism in the Lancet in 1998 in a study that has been discredited. His motives were consider unethical and he lost his license to practice medicine but the damage was done. The seed was planted and the battle has continued with the scientists and doctors one one side and the Autism fanatics on the other. Emotions run high and children go unvaccinated in the US and Europe. Measles carries a fatality rate of 1 per 1000 cases with 1 in 4 cases hospitalized. This conflict isn’t too dissimilar to the political conflict we are experiencing that has been stirred up by our current President and is being flamed by the Russians, all they have to do is pick an issue, any issue. No room for compromise, they want us to be at polar ends of the argument. That way we all surfer.
memsomerville (Somerville MA)
Few stories on this also noted that they did the same thing on anti-GMO issues. That scientific paper came out months ago. This is an assault on science on many fronts. There are real consequences to this kind of misinformation on food, infection, climate. Who are you gonna hear? Scientists or dissemblers? What should we make policy on? Think this through.
Kiljoy616 (Miami)
@memsomerville But anti science is everywhere in the States. Just look at any evangelical cult and you have a hate for science and logic. You do not need the "ruski" to show what a mess letting religion into government leads in the long run.
Jack (House)
It’s an interesting approach by the Russians to use views toward Vaccines to sway the election. Yet, I’m curious, did anyone ever actually read these tweets?
Andy (nyc)
Why was the anti-vaxer's 4 year old crying? Midlife crisis. That's what the Russians should've trolled.
idimalink (usa)
Dr. Broniatowski suspiciously reads like a name readers may associate with a troll. Congressional investigators and NBC News are well known collaborators with the CIA to spread nationalist lies.
DebObara (Costa Mesa)
@idimalink Broniatowski sounds like a name of Polish descent, so to me, it sounds nothing like a "troll" name. Not does it sound Russian.
Davide (Pittsburgh)
@idimalink Quite a topical comment, at least in the sense of exemplifying the very subject matter of this article.
Nasty Curmudgeon fr. (Boulder Creek, Calif.)
It could also be Prussian
Paul P (Greensboro,nc)
Oh, l get it now, the Russians are exploiting the misinformed. No wonder they fit in so well with the Trump team.
Awake (New England)
Pretty nasty, but lots of stupid people. But it is Friday and a report of measles in Boston so time to party. Let's get some unpasteurized milk, and road trip to Boston to have a Pox party!!! Cough on a random stranger on the way home to spread the joy. Come on people, think.
PeteH (MelbourneAU)
They don't think, you're right, because they haven't been taught the think critically. It's a problem everywhere, but would seem to be particularly apparent in a country where about 40% of the population are said to believe that the universe was created less that 6000 years ago. If that's your baseline, then it's no wonder immunisation safety is a hard sell.
MB (California)
I really wish the NY Times would stop referring to anti-vax shenanigans as the "Vaccine Debate". There is no debate, only misinformation that seeks to obscure the science on vaccine effectiveness.
JND (Abilene, Texas)
No discord for me. Anti-vaxers are morons.
Andre Hoogeveen (Burbank, CA)
You are, of course, welcome to your thoughts and opinions on the matter, but should we not try to bridge the gap with those with whom we disagree? Slinging insults back-and-forth is not going to get us anywhere. This is exactly what these so-called “trolls” want.
Nadir (NYC)
Bridge what gap? Anti-vaxxers put the nation at risk with their anti-science, and small minded conspiracy beliefs. There should be no “coming together” as you said in an earlier comment. Vaccination should be compulsory. No opt-outs for conspiracy fears or nonsensical religious reason.
yulia (MO)
Yeah, before Russians there was no opposition to vaccination in the US. It is all making of Russian trolls. By the way, American schools do grant a waiver of vaccination on the ground of religious beliefs. So, brining God in discussion about vaccination is not something new in the US but rather established practice.
Davide (Pittsburgh)
@yulia God has been the pretext for all kinds of skullduggery in the US from the earliest days (Salem, anyone?), but the phenomenon was and is hardly limited to that era or place. Russians, of all people, should know that.
Jim (PA)
Many Americans are eager contrarians who reject science as a way of feeling smarter than the "establishment." Whether it be rejection of vaccines (often times by many on the left), or denial of global warming (overwhelming by those on the right), we have an epidemic of anti-science sentiment in the country.
Mondo (Seattle)
It's important to actually evaluate the science, not just make quasi-religious claims about "deniers".
Tennis Fan (Chicago)
@Mondo And who is best equipped to "actually evaluate the science"? People skilled in conceiving of means to make vaccines and those evaluating the results of evaluating their efficacy? Or some neighbor who has heard from their neighbor that they read somewhere that vaccines are harmful?
B Dawson (WV)
@Jim The idea that something has been proven and therefore cannot ever be wrong is as dangerous a belief as rejecting evolution based on Biblical passages. There is a huge difference between blindly accepting research (often bought and paid for) and critically examining it. Take a look at the number of papers journals have retracted due to shoddy work or outright manipulation of data. Science said DDT was safe, lab data showed PCB and BPA were safe, unbridled use of antibiotics was endorsed by medicine. Those who voiced strong opposition to antibiotic overuse decades ago and were told to go fish. Today the accusation would be "anti-science". Yet here we are with resistant TB, SARS, C-diff...the list continues to grow. What if those voices hadn't been drowned out by absolutists who knew the "truth"? My physical anthropology prof so many years ago, defined science perfectly: "There are no capital 'T' truths in biology; there are only little 't' truths and those are only true until someone proves them false."
JeffB (Plano, Tx)
Shutting down social media (as if that is even possible) won't fix the problem. Part of the issue is that we have yet to solve the issue of identity on the internet. Anyone can hide anonymously behind an account and not be held at all accountable for their behavior. It's like we've given everyone carte blanche to yell 'Fire' behind the curtain at a movie theater. However, it's not just a movie theater but the entire world. It's not just the Russians but Americans that are gaming this broken system for their own enrichment and benefit. Thousands of US citizens are actively posting to sway the markets one way or the other based on their positions on Wall Street. Thousands of US citizens and companies are actively engaged in posting fake reviews of competitor products. It used to be called fraud.
JS (Chicago, IL)
@JeffB Sadly, I have to agree with you. We need to make the social media companies directly libel for the statements of accounts they do not adequately identify. A few multi-million dollar slander settlements and they would get serious about identifying users. Right now they are in the position of the anonymous molotov cocktail vendor that just happens to be next to an arson scene.
Jean (Vancouver)
@JeffB There used to be something called 'practicing medicine without a license' too. You could not advertise that you could cure cancer or diabetes without having some sort of medical certificate. Now any huckster can charge you for any kind of woo, and that is just 'good business'.
Marat In 1784 (Ct)
Interesting. You’ve heard of augmented reality, yes? This is augmented conflict, augmented stupidity, augmented distrust. For Russia, a great strategy to destroy us without firing a shot. The planted seeds will germinate forever. A de facto civil war, with education, science, medicine, democracy as the primary casualties. Explains how trump, who manufactures discord, is supported so well.
Al (Idaho)
@Marat In 1784. The democrats, by using many of the same tactics and reducing everyone who disagrees with them to a cliche and name calling have helped create this atmosphere. One side should try to stick to the facts and even acknowledge ones they don't like ( ex- some democrats refuse to even acknowledge the state of the economy, because trump might get some credit) rather than stooping to a version of right wing politics.
Johnny (LA, CA)
At this point there can be no doubt that social media is a failed experiment. The Russians have used pure diabolical genius to weaponize these platforms against us, effectively transforming them into vast cesspools of lies and hatred-provoking inhumanity. KILL YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
Abby (Pleasant Hill, CA)
@Johnny THROW THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATHWATER BEFORE HE GROWS UP!
yulia (MO)
According to German study, it is not so much about trolling, it is much more about people preferring echo chambers, where their beliefs are confirmed, no matter how far from reality they could be. I am not exactly understand what is the fear with Russian trolls, if they just add arguments to the both sides? Doesn't that produce zero effect? Insults? It is funny even to speak about in the country where insults are a huge part of the successful TV shows. Remember? reality TV where hosts insult participants.
Johnny (LA, CA)
@Abby - Alas, the social media baby IS all grown up, and is a hopeless malignant sociopath.
Mary (Oregon)
Wait a minute... Dorit Rubenstein Reiss and Paul Offit are Russian trolls?? Who knew...
limarchar (Wayne, PA)
@Mary They're the ones valiantly responding to the Russian trolls.
mary (ny)
It seems Russian trolls are having a field day on this column today!
limarchar (Wayne, PA)
And the New York Times comment sections have played a role in this ongoing fiasco. Anyone who regularly reads these sections can see that certain threads are plagued by disinformation. Please, New York Times, think twice about allowing posts that are blatantly factually incorrect, like the anti-vaccination posts below. Lives depend on it.
Naomi (Monterey Bay Area, Calif)
@limarchar, everyone: I've flagged the anti-vaccination comments here as spam, inflammatory, and irrelevant; make sure you flag them, too.
Talbot (New York)
Suppose the Russians start to post pro and con messages on e cigarettes, seatbelts, home schooling, school admissions tests, low income multifamily housing, or about a million other things? All they are doing is joining a million other voices on every possible side of every argument. Every time we react as if these messages are "tearing us apart." As if the same messages from Indiana or Texas or Canada or India for that matter are ho hum who cares. But if they're traced to some Russian, it's hair on fire time. Can we please just accept that messages we like or don't like / agree or disagree with can come from anywhere in the planet and stop letting them drive us crazy?
Andre (Novosibirsk,Russia)
@Talbot You probably did not read the writings of Dr. Goebbels. In his books it is proved that the Russians are guilty of all the woes of mankind for the last thousand years. The first thing that should be instilled in every child in a civilized country is the Russian enemies of civilization. Russia - Mordor. I hope that you will read the New York Times more, and your doubts will disappear.
JP (Toronto)
@Talbot completely missing the point; it’s like watching an argument and then saying “hey you two should start fighting” - then imagine feeling the need to say that from the other side of the planet...
Middleman MD (New York, NY)
@Talbot Look, in 2012 the hot discussion among youth in Europe was why they were not eligible to participate in US elections, since the outcome of the US election would have a great impact on their futures. Here in NYC, I've regularly seen placards at rallies decrying the racism of prioritizing the privileges of US citizens over those of other countries. What it comes down to is this: It is perfectly okay for citizens of other countries to have a say in US elections, and maybe even to vote in our elections, but not if they are Russians, and not if they support Donald Trump.
Charles (Clifton, NJ)
Very revealing reporting by Donald McNeil. It raises the question beyond the technical capability of the Russian trollers: is there any theoretical guidance from behavioral experts? Not to raise the specter of a “Manchurian candidate”, but there has to be more behind this Russian activity than a bunch of Twinkie eating, Coke consuming kids who are randomly trying to disrupt things (there just must be a cache of Twinkies in Russia). In that regard, a question is, do the originators of this troll strategy have a metric for their success? There is no reason to conduct activity like this if there is no benefit. But we don’t want to credit Russian intelligence with too much acumen. A lot of this trolling could have been initiated by misguided groups that were funded by poorly directed management. It’s serious. Our intelligence services need to understand the *direction*, the purpose, of these Russian efforts, which I am sure they are investigating. Russian trolls during the 2016 election, and probably the presidential primary, benefitted trump. Trump’s private conversation with Putin, the contents of which are unreported to the American people, and turmp’s opaque relation with Russia, give us no confidence in him to defend the U.S. against Russian intervention. In trump, Russians found the ability to control our heartland through trump’s loyal followers. If they control that, then they control our government because of its electoral system. It’s brilliant.
Mark (Rocky River, Ohio)
But, that represents only a small fraction of those who actually brought claims to the Vaccine Court. You see, there is a 36 month window to bring the claim. There is no “tolling” granted for minors, unlike all the Civil Courts in the U.S. Guess what? Neurological injuries may not present in infants for long after 36 months. Furthermore, who knows how many cases were never brought by attorneys on behalf of a vaccine injured child, because the statute of limitations ran out? Don’t let anyone tell you that vaccines don’t cause injury. They have, they do and they will do so in the future. For years, Thimerosal was used as a preservative in multi-dose vials. While still proclaiming it “safe”, vaccine makers “voluntarily” removed Thimerosal. It is still present in trace amounts and in flu vaccine. Thimerosal was never approved by the FDA, as the patents predated the establishment of said regulations. Worried? With nearly 6,000 cases pending the USCFC held the “Omnibus Autism Hearings.” They decided not to make “autism” a “table injury.” How convenient. Since there would never be enough money to pay for all who claim an “autism” injury. But, there have been many cases compensated for “encephalopathy” as a diagnosis with reference to autism. You can read it: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1681&cont...
Kay (MN)
@Mark No vaccine is flawless, and can potentially have negative side effects including 'injury'. But just because somebody makes a claim doesn't establish vaccine-autism causality - this is not valid evidence. Even if you believe that vaccines cause autism, you have to pick your poison -- millions of people dying from Measles and other diseases, or a bump in autism? My child having autism, or dying a horrible death from a preventable disease? It seems like people forget the purpose of vaccines in the first place. I appreciate people who are skeptical, but weigh the outcomes here.
Kara Ben Nemsi (On the Orient Express)
@Mark A mere hundred years ago, every 5th child did not live to celebrate its 5th birthday. Infectious diseases were the principal reason for that. Vaccination made an enormous difference, and so did antibiotics, of course (which also have killed scores of people through allergic reactions or other hypersensitivities, by the way). I was perhaps one of the last children that were not vaccinated against measles when the vaccine became available in the 60's. I had the measles and I do not wish them on any child. I was sick like a dog and I still vividly remember the photophobia and the pain from the inflammatory responses. Luckily, I did not get the severe neurological and usual lethal subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Totally preventable by vaccination. Then again, without these vaccinations I may also never have become the very stable genius from the fringes of the autism spectrum disorder that I am....
jeffk (Virginia )
That was one wild ramble but the fact remains that numerous diseases are now prevented and child mortality is dramatically reduced due to vaccines and that is a fact.
Nadia (San Francisco)
Make. It. Stop. Russia didn't meddle in our election. They made laughingstocks out of Americans who think that twitter, facebook, instagram, (& whatever else) are actual sources of news. That's all they did. Now the whole free world is freaking out and Putin is sitting back, congratulating himself on creating such overblown uproars. With nothing but posts to social media. People, a monkey could probably be taught how to post to facebook. Certainly an intelligent parrot could. There's something called "discernment." All of America -- definitely including what passes for actual media these days -- needs to learn how to use it.
JS (Chicago, IL)
@Nadia To learn discernment, people need an education, which the Republicans are trying desperately to prevent.
Mark (Rocky River, Ohio)
“Vaccines Are Unavoidably Unsafe” Don’t take my word for it. This is the unmistakable conclusion of the SCOTUS in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, LLC in a decision in 2011. Unfortunately, due to the protections afforded the vaccine maker in the National Childhood Vaccine Act of 1986, the Court ruled against a vaccine injured plaintiff in the case. How? In the 1980s, children were having adverse reactions to the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine. Lots of lawsuits were being filed against docs and vaccine manufacturers. This caused the pharmaceutical industry to threaten pulling out of the vaccine market, and the alarm bells rang that the nation’s health and safety were at risk. Why were vaccine manufacturers getting ready to take their ball and go home? Because vaccines fall into a class of products considered “unavoidably unsafe.” I am not kidding you. This “unavoidable” word comes from the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act itself “products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe.” I am NOT a TROLL! I will give the readers the rest of the story below.
SteveRR (CA)
@Mark You're not a troll but you're simply not making an argument either.
Observer (The Alleghenies)
Off-topic, sorry, but I've been thinking that the ascent of Trump is the best evidence yet that the Illuminati don't exist, unless, like Sauron, they want to "sow discord." As for vaccination, this and most/all other conspiracy theories are for people who haven't learned to handle reality.
Mark (Rocky River, Ohio)
For the record, I am not “anti-vaccine.” Both of my children were fully vaccinated. Unfortunately for us, our son was neurologically disabled by vaccines. It is indisputable, yet the government and the vaccine makers still think that there is a “greater good” to be served. They may be right. But, let’s not fool ourselves. Vaccines can be made safer. It is about money.
Glenn Ribotsky (Queens)
One has to wonder to just what extent the Russian and other trolls out there have contributed to the polarization of many issues in the United States and other parts of the Western world, and not just over vaccines. That's not to say that there haven't always been differences, but these apparent attempts to exacerbate and intensify them, and rouse up emotions that lessen the opportunity for dialogue and political compromise, always lead to the question of who benefits from this, and what the trolls are actually trying to accomplish. So, always be on guard. There just seem to be so many out there willing to manipulate too many of us for idiosyncratic reasons that may not be in most of our best interests. (Of course, I'm simplistic and think it always comes down to augmenting political power, and with that, the opportunity to augment riches. But that's just me.)
yulia (MO)
Sure, killing of African Americans by police is not a divisive issue, but tweets about that definitely are. Opposition to vaccination is not dangerous, but discussion of vaccination is. I guess some people think actions are fine as long as nobody knows about them.