How Record Heat Wreaked Havoc on Four Continents

Jul 30, 2018 · 82 comments
roger (Michigan)
I suspect that it is far too late to reverse climate change caused by mankind. Easy to predict are things like more wildfires, reducing crop yields, rising seas/flooding or shortage of drinking water. Then let us consider the effect over decades of these changes: migration of people because they can no longer survive where they are. It is likely to occur in many parts of the world, possibly including parts of the USA. Continued efforts to limit climate change need to be maintained but perhaps it is more important to undertake large scale planning to best deal with the big changes that are coming. This might already be happening but like the British government prior to WWII, nothing is being published in order to avoid panic.
marawa5986 (San Diego, CA)
Combating climate change is nothing short of war; the changes in the climate are attacking our planet and everything in it. We must immediately begin to treat it as a dire emergency of catastrophic proportions, or our societies will disintegrate, animals and plant life will die, and we'll all be gone soon. Unfortunately, those currently in power only care about accumulating wealth at the expense of Earth.
SK (Ca)
Throughout human history, we do not change until disaster hit. This time is different because we are flirting with nature. Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhole tossed a snow ball on the senate floor and argued that climate change is a "hoax ". This was in 2014. Where is his snow ball now ?
JR (Austin, Tx)
It was 110 in the shade here in Austin last week -- the hottest July day in the city's recorded history! We're used to the heat here, but c'mon, this is getting ridiculous.
reader123 (New Jersey)
The Republicans in Congress willfully deny science. Vote them out this November.
Ralphie (CT)
I would add to my earlier comment that articles like this will not convince skeptics. Anecdotal information isn't science. And a hastily thrown together paper based on a handful of data points claiming that the heat wave is in part due to climate change isn't convincing either.
Pauly K (Shorewood)
@Ralphie You might be arguing that green house gases don't trap and retain heat. I'm convinced they do. It's all about the composition of the atmosphere, and we're heating up the planet.
mary bardmess (camas wa)
@Ralphie Do not assume that is the purpose of this article. Nothing will convince a skeptic at this point. They are beyond reasoning. It's news, not persuasion.
Ralphie (CT)
@mary bardmess of course it is an attempt to persuade. All of the articles in the climate section are about how it is getting warmer. They are for the most part anecdotal. You didn't see an article here about April being unusually cool this year did you? And you certainly misspeak. A skeptic by definition can be convinced with solid data. The data on warming is not convincing.
Ralphie (CT)
At any time one can go to a city somewhere in the world-- and find a new record high temperature ---or low. And talk about cherry picking data. May and June may have been relatively warm but April was the 15th coolest in the US. Jan-Mar were close to average for the US. And while May was the warmest on record it was due to higher mins, not maxs. The highest US max temp for May was in 1934. The 2nd warmest June,1933. And here's a link to Climate at a Glance for max May temps. Anyone see a trend? Note that 3 of the years with the highest max temps for May were in the 1930s. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series/110/tmax/1/5/1895-201... There have always been heat waves. To suggest this heat wave is due to climate change is way over the top. For the first six months of the year, 2018 is the 14th warmest on record, and some of the years that are ahead of it in the rankings are 1921, 1934, 1986 and 1987 -- and right behind 2018 is 1925. Hardly suggests 2018 is abnormal. And -- when you look at temps for cities -- you will almost always find their temps going up over time. But that isn't global warming. Most of our large cities in the US and the world have grown rapidly over the last 100 years, thus they suffer from the urban heat island effect. Phoenix (&metro) for example has undergone massive growth since the 1930s -- and temps have gone up at a rate 3x+ that of Arizona as a whole.
Carol S. (Philadelphia)
This is climate change in action. Good to remember it does not take science to document the real thing.
Ronald B. Duke (Oakbrook Terrace, Il.)
Unanswered questions: What is the correct temperature for the earth? How to enforce it, within what world political structure, at what cost, in what time-frame? Please, climate activists, give us the answers.
Ronald B. Duke (Oakbrook Terrace, Il.)
@Ronald B. Duke; Extra Credit: What is the correct level for the ocean? What to do about rising ocean levels? Why not let costal development be regulated by flood-insurance rates charged by insurance companies? This is not a problem that needs to be solved next week, we have a 100 years or more. Modern high-rise buildings are not designed to last over 100 years, it is assumed at the time of design that they will be obsolete by then and pulled down. The role of government should be confined to setting and enforcing rules for environment-protecting demolition and clean-up. Market forces will move development back from the brink in plenty of time. The market will get its signals from the insurance underwriters who will get their signals from whatever government agency measures ocean levels. Ockham's Razor: 'Plurality should not be posited without necessity'--Never mind complex answers if simple ones will get you there. Quit worrying about climate change, the market is your friend, it'll show you how to deal with the problem, if that's what it is, in the simplest, most cost effective way. Everybody calm down.
James Wittebols (Detroit. MI)
"The market" is the problem not the solution. Short term profits do not account for all the negative externalities to carbon energy--how many people would be able to afford a car if the cost of gasoline included the price for cleaning the air it dirtied? Plenty of time? Where did you come up with that one? Climate scientists say we have to be 80% carbon reduction by 2030 100% by 2050 to avoid more than 2 degrees centigrade warming. The "market" is a human construct; there is nothing natural about it.
MomT (Massachusetts)
@Ronald B. Duke The "market" only works for people who have means. It is all well and good to chat about how the "market" will work it out when you are living in an upscale suburb of Chicago and have your AC on when the temperature rises. Yes, the climate on Earth has changed many times. That doesn't mean that populations weren't devastated when those changes happened. People migrated, just as they are trying to do now. But back then the competition for resources wasn't as controlled as it is now and the differences between the "haves" and "have nots" couldn't even have been contemplated.
fsrbaker (Los Angeles)
I object to the common wording used when discussing this tragedy. It is not "our failure". We who know the truth need to place the blame where it belongs because the vast majority of us are essentially powerless. The blame lies with corrupt politicians and their true constituents, the greedy wealthy pushers of consumption and consumerism. Could the powerless put an end to it by refusing to be manipulated? Maybe, but the odds are against it because the manipulators are too good at what they do.
idimalink (usa)
July 1974 I celebrated my Southwest city's setting a record for number of consecutive days of 115 F or over. I was young, and the heat did not bother me then. In June 1990 my father was boarded for a flight out of town. It was cancelled when the temp reached 122 F and the take off chart only went up to 120 F. I think it was 1995, and I was preparing the car for a trip the Grand Canyon, North Rim. I remarked it was really hot in the garage. On the Ten O'Clock News they reported the high that day was 121 F. Yikes!
Catherine (VA)
Blame Al Gore! For these temperatures, and for the wildfires! He said this would happen, years ago, in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. Dang science, Dang if he wasn’t onto something. All joking aside, I just arrived home from a steamy hot week in London. 95 degrees Fahrenheit outside? The amazing British Museum of Natural History was sweltering- no AC. Trains in the Underground were delayed. Free bottles of water were being handed out at tourist spots around the city. First World problem? Yes. Whole Planet problem? Yes indeed.
Scott (Paradise Valley,AZ)
We call this summer in Phoenix. 110 is tough but manageable. I uber in anything past 115 because my black interior car will burn my skin and I will need oven gloves to drive. It becomes almost inhumane most employers here do not have covered parking. You get used to the heat. People whining in LA need to enjoy a nice 120 degrees where the entire city is on alert.
Stacey (Michigan)
@Scott 110 F is a common and natural occurrence in Phoenix though. I think you missed the point of the article.
Debbie (New York)
My children are in their 20s and don't want children. And quite frankly, I don't blame them. While the idea of being a grandparent has some emotional appeal, when I look at young children now, I feel sorry for them. They will face struggles that we can't even begin to imagine. Our abject failure in addressing the most urgent challenge to our survival is profoundly depressing.
Grandmother (California)
California is on fire as are many other places around the world. Definitely fueled by climate disruption. We have run out of time for folks to indulge in fear, apathy or depression, especially if you have children or grandchildren. The UN has been meeting for 24 yrs with little result in stopping climate disruption. The fossil fuel industry's wealth & power is still influencing policy. We know that nonviolent people's movements have been effective in the USA. It's past time for millions of citizens to rise as one to demand real climate leadership. We need leaders who are committed to the tough choices that need to be made to keep fossil fuels in the ground and create an immediate just transition off of fossil fuels. No more wasting resources on fossil fuel extraction, infrastructure, or refinery expansions. No more fossil fuel subsidies. And, yes to job retraining into jobs that with the same pay and benefits, yes to a nation wide shift to renewables, yes to funding research and development of solutions and implementing those solutions. And, yes to rising with folks around the world on Sept 8th for RISE for Climate, Jobs & Justice - https://peoplesclimate.org/actions/sept-8/ There have been times in US history when citizens have come together to rise up against injustice and harms. This is one of those times and perhaps the most important.
Ron A (NJ)
C'mon, not too biased. Couldn't you find anyone that likes hot weather? Getting acclimated isn't that hard but it takes a little time. You'd at least think people in some places that'd been tortured with freezing temps for centuries would welcome a little warmth. And, places that are already a desert, does adding a few more degrees really make much difference? When you get to NYC, which had a day about 100 this month, I'll tell you I was out running for four hours that day just because of it.
ACM (Palo Alto, CA)
"does adding a few more degrees really make much difference?" Wow Ron, you REALLY don't understand the magnitude of Climate Change if you think it is about " a few more degrees difference." But hey, I guess since you were out running in 100 heat, I guess all this fuss is over nothing and there is no climate problem to address. Thank God you commented here with your scientific proof of how wrong those of us who "can't get acclimated" really are.
cheryl (yorktown)
@Ron A Adding "a few more degrees" in the triple digits can and does kill people who do not have any respite.
Mark Rindner (Pompano Beach)
@Ron A If you add a few more degrees to the polar ice caps, you will be swimming, not running, in New York City because it will be under water. It’s not so much about a little human discomfort but about a worldwide ecological nightmare. Try to see beyond yourself and picture what happens to life in costal regions. Scary.
Gordeaux (NJ)
Listen to the Koch brothers and their paid experts and deny climate change until we reach the point where it is undeniable, a time that is imminent. Sadly, human beings are far better adapted to addressing immediate threats than to ones slowly evolving over time. All thinking people who are interested in the survival of the planet need to immediately commit to lowering carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. With a worldwide commitment it could be accomplished. The time is now.
W.Wolfe (Oregon)
Planet Earth IS getting too hot, and it IS caused by humans burning fossil fuels. We've known this as Truth since the 1960's, but every year, things get continually worse, as Congress gets bought off, and Big Oil or Peabody Coal "needs another Study" to examine the data. Last Summer, in S.W.Oregon, it was way over 100 degrees, every day, for all of July and August. This year, we are having the same furnace-like heat. It is difficult on Livestock and the Trees, let alone Humans. We know that we humans are creating this heat wave. We know of other non-polluting, renewable ways to create Energy without burning Oil or Coal, yet their Lobbies keep the greenhouse gases coming. Maybe Urban people who live in air conditioning and think that Water just comes out of the tap aren't concerned. For people who work outdoors with Livestock and with Farming, it is becoming a real Hell. Add to that the many huge Wild Fires in S.W.Oregon, and the situation is beyond rough. The air quality is so bad, you can't see the trees across the road. We could be breathing bad air in 112 degrees for months. The current Fires are so large, it could take Winter's rains to put them out (if we even get decent rain this Winter). We know the cause of the problem. We know how to fix it; with Solar, Wind-Power, and Bio-diesel, but very little has been done. And the furnace like heat rolls on. In this troubled World, the first people that I would "give a raise" to would be our Firefighters.
Scott Werden (Maui, HI)
And AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is only one of the three world-changing challenges humanity will face over the next 50-100 years. The other two are the depletion of fresh water, both surface water and aquifers, and the depletion of global oil reserves. While the latter will help the AGW problem, it will throw the global economy into a tail spin. The world runs on oil, period. Jets won't fly, transportation of food and other basics will come to a halt (trains, semi-trucks, and ocean freighters all run on diesel), the huge plastics industry will cease. Known oil reserves are projected to be gone in 50 years, but the effects will be felt probably in 35-40 years. That is less than the projected time scale for AGW to be a serious, global problem. The reality is, humanity has pretty much boxed itself into a precarious situation. We have grown our population to unsustainable numbers with no end in sight. We consume resources such as oil and water at rates that have harmed our environment. We consume fresh water at rates that far exceed the replenishment rate. I have no idea what will happen and I probably won't be around to see it, but the future of humanity is not looking very rosy to me. Perhaps this will be an event that forces an evolutionary change to our species, resulting in a new species that is kinder and gentler to the Earth environment.
tamchief (San Francisco, CA)
Planet Earth has a fever.
Judy from upstate (syracuse)
@tamchief ......because of an infection by humans.
John Jones (Cherry Hill NJ)
IN THE PHILLY AREA Where I live, we've been most fortunate to have moderate temperatures this summer with abundant rain. Usually our summers are both scorching from the heat and suffocating from the humidity. We've had droughts and dangerous heat waves in the past. And I'm certain that our future holds much of the same. When I drive through areas where people don't have air conditioning, I see the suffering. The fire hydrants are turned on so that the kids mostly can keep cool. But they have to go into their overheated homes to try to sleep. We can still make a difference by setting the US on the ethical and moral path toward a green, sustainable future. Trump's propping up of coal misses the point, since the Coal Museum in Kentucky is powered by solar panels on its roof. The French got it right when they sent tiny pieces of coal in a regional newspaper, on the day that their last coal mine closed. All other forms of energy are cheaper and less polluting that coal. But Trump never troubles himself to be distracted by the facts. He tries to get us to buy his lies by talking about fake news. Well if you want to be 100% sure to read fake news, just read what Trump tells you to read! Never in my life did I imagine that I would live to see the day that such a monster would be president of the US. Trump abuses friends of the US and kisses up to dictators and tyrants. He lines the pockets of the 1% with tax cuts paid for by the 99%. Trump is a slave driver. A DEVIL!
Reed Erskine (Bearsville, NY)
The rabid right wing used to call Obama the "antichrist". It seems odd the term hasn't come up lately. Maybe it's because American Christian Evangelists have decided that POTUS is their savior now.
Dinah Friday (Williamsburg)
@John Jones Don’t give Trump too much credit; he is not acting solo. He is Republican Number One — the best they’ve got.
Henning Zieglet (Berlin)
For the benefit of your international readers, please add the celcius value to any (confusing and obsolete) fahrenheit value. Merci!
Gerry Professor (BC Canada)
@Henning Zieglet 9/5 Celsius plus 32. There you have it.--Or 5/9 F less 32. Pretty easy conversion either way.
Wolf Bein (Yorba LInda, CA)
@Henning Zieglet To convert, simply type the value followed "Fahrenheit to Celsius into google. Fahrenheit is nicer, as it is easier relatable to the human perception of temperature: Zero very cold, One hundred quite hot plus it is a finer scale.
MelMill (California)
@Henning Zieglet I read the Guardian every day and I make my own conversions ... or rather Goggle does.
David G. (Monroe, NY)
It’s just a number......until you’re actually in the zone! I once visited Phoenix in July — 113F. Unbelievable. Then I visited the Negev Desert of Israel — 117F. Simply unfit for humans. I’m terrified for my children and grandchildren.
MelMill (California)
@David G. It's just a number even when you do live in the zone. 113 F in Phoenix in July is just not that big a deal if you live there all year long. In fact, we desert inhabitants know how to cope and our bodies have adjusted but if you travel from a different climate to the desert in the summer it is no fun. For us? Swimming at midnight in a pool that doesn't need to be heated ... divine!
Steve (Los Angeles)
Let's see, the President of the United States repudiates the Paris Agreement on climate change and the while Brits suffer through an epic heat wave they, the Brits honor Trump with an audience with Queen Elizabeth. I'm confused. He should be on trial in the Hague for crimes against humanity.
Woodie Garber (New Hampshire)
A little math, Celsius makes it so clear, but it works exactly the same in F, just a different scale. Human's are water based and warm blooded. We can't veer much from our body temp. 37 degrees C. Humans, both Conservatives and Liberals, are very temperature sensitive. Water freezes below 0 degree C , 50 degrees C is 13 degrees above body temperature. 50 degrees (122 F) is also halfway to boiling water. So roughly, minus 10 degrees C to 50 degrees C. That's about our livable temperature range as either conservative Republicans or liberal Democrats. We can extend that range with a space type suit with cooling and/or heating and insulation. but unless we dome the planet in areas, there goes the outside. Or spend all our time inside a temperature controlled environment which many humans already do. And that's where we're heading. We are busy creating an unsurvivable planet to survive on. This is still the first planet we will have to save ourselves from and it looks like we've blow past all the warning signs and Mother Earth is coming in for the kill. "Faith alone won't save us anymore". Bad Religion 1990. I have see this coming for a long time and this is all old news and it should be obvious now to enough people we listened to the wrong people who said it would be fine and scientists don't know anything. Bernie Sanders is batting 1000 though. Time to make a U turn. If we want to live.
frank (Boston)
This is just the beginning. I try not to contemplate the future, even that just twenty years from now, for it is too frightening. Before reflexively blaming Trump, ask yourself, have you done all you can do? Given up air travel, meat, and children? Or do you expect technology to save you from any meaningful sacrifice?
anonymouseus (New Orleans)
@frank And giving up your car.
Riot Nrrrd (Los Angeles, CA)
@frank I drive an electric Fiat, have only been on a plane once this year, only eat meat a couple of times a year, and have no children. I even recycle religiously. What do I win?
frank (boston)
Peace of mind perhaps that you actually tried. In the end all any of us can do is try to define what it is to be human.
John LeBaron (MA)
"Is it because of climate change?" To ask this question is rapidly becoming as absurd as "Is the Pope Catholic?" "Do bears, um, breathe in the forest?" "Is grass green?" or "Do most birds fly?"
Ignatz Farquad (New York)
Oh but there's no global warming, just a big Chinese conspiracy. We will hold the Republican Criminal Organization completely responsible for obstructing, thwarting, and subverting any measures to ameliorate, combat or mitigate global warming. I hope red states boil in hell for supporting and sending Republican criminals to Congress. November 6, 2018. The Reckonmg for Republican liars, criminals and traitors. Vote!
Richard Frauenglass (Huntington, NY)
How dare you assign rabbit as a "disaster" food. It has been eaten for centuries, is tender and tasty. In fact it is a disgrace that no one seems to serve it due to sensibilities not gastronomy.
Gerry Professor (BC Canada)
@Richard Frauenglass Growing up in Indiana, BBQ rabbit was a frequent meal at our home. My father and many others hunted rabbits, squirrels, quail, duck, frogs (gigging--not for the tame of heart).
Richard Frauenglass (Huntington, NY)
@Gerry Professor Frogs legs are a delicacy in French restaurants. They too have a mild meat. Basically made in a garlic-butter sauce akin to shrimp scampi. And yes, they are good but you need lots to make a meal.
expat (Morocco)
I am a firm believer in climate change and global warming. However I think we need to consider that it may not be universal or constant. I live in Marrakech Morocco where between mid-June and mid-September temperatures between 105° and 115°F are the daytime norms with the occasional 120°. This year is different. It has yet to reach 105° this year or if it did only briefly. I have used my a/c only briefly on a few days. My electricity bills for June and July are a third of normal.
sjs (Bridgeport, CT)
@expat but that is the point: its not constant. The extremist heat is part of the ever increasing swings of the weather. As is the massive amounts of rain some parts of the world is getting and the increasing strength of hurricanes. The only constant is 'more': the hots hotter, the cold colder, the wets wetter and the dry dryer.
bounce33 (West Coast)
As you cover climate change, be sure to include climate change heroes. People who are making a difference developing innovative solutions to both reduce CO2 emissions and to mitigate the consequences. Studies show that people are motivated by stories of heroism and we need to get motivated and excited about tackling this huge problem. We solve climate change not because it is easy, but because it is hard. This is the attitude that got us to the moon under John Kennedy.
DSL (Los Angeles)
Agree! @bounce33
Gerhard (NY)
In the interest of fair and balanced reporting you should have talked to both winners and losers. In countries formerly too cold to grow food , people now can. "In Canada, climate change could open new farmland to the plow" https://globalnews.ca/news/3765838/canada-climate-change-farmland/ Climate change was first investigated by Svente Arrhenius, who calculated in 1896 the effect of CO2 on climate. His result was within a factor 2 of modern science, but to his disappointment too small to perceptibly increase the length of the growing season of Sweden
Me (NYC)
Maybe, if the erratic and unpredictable weather conditions, including extreme rainfall, flooding, and drought that come with warming temps don't erase any of the benefits. It will be interesting to see which food crops, trees, and other plants are able to manage the fluctuating temperatures. Alternating heat waves and cold weather that arrive at unexpected times in winter and early spring must be a major stressor for plants.
Jake Jortles (Jacksonville)
Changes in the global climate have the power to cause unprecedented and simultaneous upheavals in many infrastructures. This is not a game we should be playing just to see how things shake out. Economies and people will suffer, especially those who are underprivileged, and there will be continued loss of life from global warming. Let's drop the false narrative that Canada is somehow praying for global warming to wreak havoc on many other countries.
Jake Jortles (Jacksonville)
@Gerhard By the way, ever heard of the Canadian Shield? Good luck trying to farm on that.
Richard Fried (Vineyard Haven, MA)
The real tragedy is the lost opportunity that the USA had to lead the world out of this disaster. We are the major contributors to this problem. We also had the money, power and scientific talent to solve it. We could have led the world to a better place as we did in Europe after WWII. Even now, as we watch this disaster unfold before our eyes, we actually enact polices to make this problem worse! I truly do not think we are intelligent animals. I am deeply saddened by this conclusion.
ACM (Palo Alto, CA)
Matt, Richard is not blaming the U.S. for the world's problems. He stated we are a major contributor, which we are. More importantly he pointed out that We (the U.S.) are missing a golden opportunity to lead the world with our technology to help reduce human impact on the climate. You completely (or intentionally) missed the point he was trying to make in your attempt to "defend" the U.S. from a valid and reasonable statement.
MN (Michigan)
Terrifying.
Doctor Woo (Orange, NJ)
Phoenix was over 120 ... I don't think the human race can survive if it's that hot all over for long periods of time.
Dontbelieveit (NJ)
@Doctor Woo We won't. YouTube Guy McPherson and learn what's coming.....
Me (NYC)
The lowest setting on the oven in my kitchen is 120 degrees.
NoDak (Littleton CO)
David Brooks suggests that we will be spared from national collapse because great examples of local good works will overwhelm the Trumpian attacks against social institutions. I believe by looking at the Trumpian attacks against the environment and the scientific proofs of global warming we can see that local action on major issues is not enough. The forests of the Great American West are dying, and as Trump’s EPA rolls back mileage and emission standards Americans continue to buy larger vehicles requiring more and more oil and causing more CO2 production. Riding Motorcycle Through The Little Belt (A mountain range in Montana) Winding through the Little Belt I saw death today. The few green sentries standing tall Their comrades ashen gray. The smoke and ash from wilderness, It's very soul in flame, Settles in the Little Belt, and Whispers, "Soon the Same." Soon, what wretched beetle spares, The few that stand about, Will burst in flame - a tinder box Dried through and through from drought. Winding through the Little Belt I saw death today. The dying gravely stood their ground The dead around them lay. And what of me? A simple man, But witness to this doom. Am but a fleeting traveler Quick through this future tomb. Might I and all my brethren Be the cause of all I see? No! A vengeful God and nature bear Responsibility. Winding through the Little Belt I saw death today. And I as with the dying Shall not pass again this way.
Steve (Los Angeles)
@NoDak That's beautiful.
L. Beaulieu (Carbondale, CO)
@NoDak I just passed through there last week. Thanks for the beautiful description.
LP (Portland)
Why, why, why does the story about heat in LA have to be about an artist's dinner party? Surely you could have found some people having to work in this heat that seems to be everywhere. You could start with the firefighters.
Deb (Chicago)
@LP I think it served a purpose. I took it as, this is a rich society that is key to producing the climate change, and a potential key to turning it around if our government and corporations chose to do so. An artist's dinner that needs to be eaten indoors in air conditioning is how we're affected? Surely, there was a choice there. Though Japan and Hong Kong surely produce and contribute to climate change as well, and their stories were like the others.
rosa (ca)
@LP Or the ones tarring leaky roofs.
person (planet)
@LP Indeed, that was more than a bit underwhelming, if anything, inadvertantly highlighting white upperclass privilege more than anything else.
John Davenport (San Carlos, CA)
All this, and the U.S. is governed by a political party dominated by so-called climate skeptics and fossil fuel industry magnates. Good grief!
DS (Seattle)
This makes for a sobering companion piece to The Guardian's article on the $billions in subsidies we're giving to the fossil fuel industry: "$14.7bn per year to the oil, gas, and coal industries, on top of $5.8bn of state-level incentives (globally, the figure is around $500bn)." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/20.... Why are we spending money to destroy ourselves? How high do temperatures have to rise before we change course?
Dontbelieveit (NJ)
@DS It does not matter. We are past the tipping point. Life on Earth extinguishes in not more than 8 years.
Floho (Quinn)
Thank you for this vivid illustration of the early consequences of our tepid reaction to climate disruption. We have been warned. I think that the single most important thing for each of us in the USA to do at this time is to constantly ask each every 2018 candidate about their plans to address the climate emergency. It's important to specify that we want to know plans not only for adaptation to climate change (Republicans like to focus on this part when talking about climate solutions) but reduction in ongoing greenhouse gas pollution, so that the problem doesn't get even worse. I believe that personal actions to reduce carbon pollution are also important in that these efforts, if visible, change the tone in society around conservation. Conservation is patriotic and moral! We must break the climate silence logjam through our deeds and words. I can't stop thinking of the man who pulled his gas guzzler int the clearly marked EV charging spot next to my friend's plugged-in car, and left it running while he went inside, giving us a huge smirk upon leaving. This is the attitude of the "Ugly American".
Grove (California)
@Floho Thare are a lot of them out there. Arrogant, ignorant, irresponsible, hateful and spiteful to those around them.
Fred (Columbia)
So, how long have you known my neighbors next door?
JSH (Yakima)
The article disregards a major factor in human heat related illness; humidity. In my area, 2 degrees below the Canadian Border, it is forecast to be 103F with a relative humidity of 24%. This is survivable provided the residents have functioning sweat glands and access to water. In contrast, a day long exposure to 98F and 100% humidity is universally fatal. The victims die from overheating, not dehydration. Although humidity is routinely measured and is a major factor in heat related deaths, it is almost never provided in reports of heat related deaths. This leads to a second point, the planets excess heat does not just warm oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, it evaporates water. In real terms, the 51inches/24hour of rainfall that fell last year in South Texas had to first evaporate.
MomT (Massachusetts)
@JSH I completely agree with the humidity point! I grew up in the San Fernando Valley just north of LA and last week it was 118°F! As a child the heat was a dry heat and it was much more tolerable. We didn't have AC and it was fine. Visiting my father over the years, he commented-and I could feel-the increase in the humidity. And he knew what he was talking about, having grown up in New England where the humidity is the main scourge of summer. He had put in centralized AC at that point. I cannot imagine living in the valley of today.
Priya (San Francisco)
When we discuss where we would like to retire, economic and climate change conditions are top concerns. We have seen our area ravaged by fires, and that isn't going to change.
person (planet)
@Priya Nothing personal, but when you read about this, all that comes to mind is: 'Where will I retire'?!