The Danger That Italy’s Political Crisis Poses for the Global Economy

May 30, 2018 · 49 comments
Juana (Az)
Very clarifying. Thank you.
Spengler (Ohio)
The problem with the "hellenes" is their pre-euro currency printing ways.....or maybe it was not a problem. All currency regimes have side effects. Maybe the Germanzied Ostrogothic northern Italy are whining because they got such bargains from the single market, yet are whining because the government is trapped from printing or spending more. The southern Italia's are the real Romans. Hollywood has always depicted the Roman's as too light skinned. That only came after the barbarian raids. Maybe it is time for Roman restoration and weakening of the barbarian control of Italia. They sure got all the bankers debt expansion "benefits".
Stevenz (Auckland)
The worst won't happen. It never does. In such a tightly-managed global economic order as we have now, there will be safeguards to control the damage. What *will* happen is that the Italian voter will continue to make a mockery of governance as it has for decades. Until they take take their structural issues seriously, they will lurch from crisis to miscreant regime to crisis ad infinitum. They have no one to blame but themselves.
Joe Ryan (Bloomington, Indiana)
Now, hypothetically, add to the risk factors that Mr. Irwin lists an additional one -- a run on the Italian lira -- and evaluate how the situation changes.
William (Memphis)
GREED is truly the most terrible challenge of our times, and capitalism is its tool, its means to power and more greed. Greed is a (contagious) mental illness, an unfillable hole, a hunger that denies justice, a brutal expression of broken egos. Greed is having a million times as much as the poor and still feeling you don't have enough. Greed consumes the earth without respite, and is a cancer on humanity. Greed destroys us and our children and their future. Greed is death.
Daniel Botsford (NH)
And it is as described, technically an addiction....
Marc (Westchester)
Three months ago weren't we hearing how the world economy was running like a well oiled machine "all the gears were meshing" for continued growth. Italy and Spain leaving the Euro--Redeux Indian Rupee--falling like a rock Chinese accounting irregularities Yup sounds like a well oiled machine to me.
MNMoore (Boston)
It's the usual Protestant work ethic versus settling into the cafe with a nice cappuccino.
Hooj (London)
'The markets' are signalling what they always signal. Help, we don't know what's going to happen. Help, we don't understand a foreign country or its people We're scared we might lose money because of our ignorance. Trying to read anything more subtle than that is a pointless exercise in kite flying.
Spengler (Ohio)
Sorry, but Italy doesn't understand Italy.
San Ta (North Country)
Japan has a debt/GDP ratio twice that of Italy, yet Mr. Irwin seems to have no interest in its meaning, if any, for national or int'l economic outcomes. Moreover, if Italy's creditors have their loans denominated in Euros the name a future Italian currency is immaterial. As for fiscal probity, Germany had no problem in the pre-Euro era to run deficits substantially higher than 3% of GDP in order to finance its unification. Indeed, France wanted the Euro to reign in Germany's assumed profligacy as it used deficit finance to stimulate the German economy. Turning to ITALY, Irwin does not mention any salient facts about the performance of the Italian economy since the adoption of the Euro. Prior to the adoption of the Euro, Italy's GDP was roughly on par with that of the UK, today it's about one-third lower. Unemployment in Italy is over 10% and among youth its is over one-third. Moreover, many of the employed youth are in part-time or full-time jobs that offer no prospect of longer-term continuity and income. The purchasing power of the average Italian family in about 10% below the pre-recession level. All the above is nothing to the unelected and unaccountable global investment community and the bureaucrats in the EU and ECB. The real issue that Irwin misses is whether global financial interests and supra-national organizations can overrule the desires of the people demonstrated through democratically conducted elections. That is real issue facing Italy and globalization.
Homer (Seattle)
I believe that you will find the propaganda sites for the League on another website. Your comment, like the other folks who generically blame "neoliberalism" for just about everything, entirely lacks any coherency. According to you, Italy's problem is that the world moved on, time moved on, its 2018, no longer 1918 - and yet its the bank's fault. And Italy would apparently be better off left in the 20th century; no exports to the US, no imports from anywhere, and only Italian banks financing Italian businesses. Well okay then. (eyeroll ....)
San Ta (North Country)
Don't be a fantacist. The eyerolling you experience is because you see what doesn't exist. You provide not one datum, nor do provide any coherent analysis. All you have is a sly reference to neo-fascist websites, a lot of argumentation bordering on name calling, and a bizarre notion that Italy would be better off if - if what? Are you truly ignorant of the effect the Euro is having on the ability of Italy to export without the ability to devalue its currency. Do you understand that without devaluation the cost structure of the Italian economy can be lowered only through greater wage suppression? No mention of "neoliberalism" occurs in the comment to which you are allegedly responding. In addition, the critical relation between int'l capital markets, supranational rule-making authorities and national democratic self-determination is either avoided or ignored in your reply. It is the real, as well as perceived, loss of national self-determination that is one of the major political issues of the day. If you don't rust democratic government, well just come clean. If you prefer If you prefer int'l capital flows to determine Italian - or US - economic outcomes, just be up front.
Dan Coleman (San Francisco)
There's no telling what Italians will do out of devotion to their culture and history. But it's a pretty safe bet they won't do anything at all out of devotion to the lira. They mat hate the euro as much as any country in the EU, but chucking it requires a complementary nostalgia for the alternative. This suggests a possible arbitrage opportunity if a significant mass of fundage is being invested without thinking that one through.
mmcshane (Dallas)
“No one would have thought that a crisis centered on home mortgages in the United States would prove the trigger for crises in Greece and across Europe all those years ago.” Oh, I guarantee you....SOMEONE knew that such a crisis was looming, and what the potential effects could be. No one wants to be a “party-pooper”, however.
Richard (Krochmal)
I'm not certain if, at first, anyone investment professional could have envisioned the amount of damage the mortgage backed securities would cause in the world's financial markets. It's easy to be a Monday morning quarterback. And, yes, there were people who came on board with their worries as these mortgage backed bonds were swept up by foreign governments in even greater dollar amounts. Very few were interested in listening to socratic commentary on the true value of these worthless bonds. Yet, like any other bubble, emotions rule without the desire necessary to measure or accept the real investment risk associated with the financial instrument in question. Can I interest you in some "Tulips?"
jb (ok)
We knew, ordinary folks in Oklahoma, when houses sprouted like crabgrass in June, big ones for miles and miles here and nationwide. God almighty, worldwide. We knew people couldn't suddenly afford them. We knew a massive scam was unfolding and fast. We didn't know how--these builders were getting paid up front, the banks on incredible hooks--but we knew it was a scam. Of course, it was patent from the start.
Stevenz (Auckland)
" if, at first, anyone investment professional That's a very qualified assumption. First of all, there's the "if". Then there is the "investment professional". If I understand what you mean by that, those so-called professionals would be the last to see it since they were at the root of the problem. They were going to ride the tiger as long as it didn't eat them. Plenty of people who weren't so invested, in both senses of the term, saw the potential, warned about it, and were proven right. The "investment professionals" bolted, laughed all the way to the bank, and set themselves up in new businesses not having paid one cent in fines or passed one day in jail for bankrupting millions of people.
ADN (New York City)
So many comments here saying the same thing in polite words. Why don’t we say it impolitely? The rich take more of everything, everybody else gets less, demagogues rise, and the global financial system crashes, enriching the rich even further. In a different world at a different time ordinary people would rebel and turn on their slavemasters. Now they either vote for them or slink off into the night, defeated and afraid. As well they should be.
joel bergsman (st leonard md)
Not to mention trade wars and ensuing problems triggered by Trump's tariffs on Chinese exports...
Frank (Colorado)
I can't wait to hear Mr. Trump's considered opinion on the macroeconomic and geopolitical implications of these events.
jb (ok)
Oh I could wait, a very long wait indeed.
Michael Blazin (Dallas, TX)
From an outsider point of view, it looks like the Italian President, while acting legally, overstepped his bounds. Imagine the uproar if Queen Elizabeth II tossed a Chancellor of the Exchequer, something she also can do, put forward by the Labor Party, if it wins the election, because she did not think he or she represented the election or had a Socialist or Communist background.
Gre (Italy)
this is not what our president did. He asked the parties to change a cabinet minister, something that other presidents have done before. The parties decided to not form a government instead of changing a single name with one other name of their choosing. Our president is elected by parliament and change every 7 years is not like a queen, he has a role not just a ceremonial one but the one of the last defender of the constitution. You can argue that his decision was unwise because it gives more ammunitions to the populist maybe but the parallel with the queen is not correct
Homer (Seattle)
Your comment is internally inconsistent. You write: " it looks like the Italian President, while acting legally, overstepped his bounds." In your world, an actor can do something entirely appropriate within the scope of his/her authority YET at the same time overstep their bounds. And your comparison is grossly inapt. The QE2 is a figure head only with no actual political authority. The Italian president is vested by the Italian Constitution with certain powers, which in this case he duly exercised. God heavens ....
Rob Franklin (California)
An obvious data point would be who holds Italian bonds. That is where the wave would hit first.
San Ta (North Country)
French banks nominally have the bulk of them, but who are the creditors of these banks? In any event, a default of French banks will require a government bailout or nationalization. So much for Macron's neoliberal tilt. However, if the debts are denominated in Euros, then Italy will have to repay in Euros or declare default. De fault, dear Brutus ... (lol).
shtiper (nyc)
ECB holds the majority of it after their QE was initiated by draghi
carol (St. Louis)
It would seem the EU gave little thought to the differences in northern and southern European financial conditions and cultural mores when it was initiated. They’ve repeated this mistake with the eastern European countries it has admitted more recently. It is a Western European organization and countries should be admitted to the EU only after they’ve risen to these standards. Expect more crises.
San Ta (North Country)
The Euro is not the EU. It is a subset of countries that have given control over their monetary system to the EU bureaucracy and an international bank - the ECB. The UK, for example, had maintained its own currency while part of the EU.
Enri (Massachusetts)
It does not pose an imminent risk for the rest of the world, but it is indicative of the stagnation there and the rest of the world. Italy’s productivity decreased 1.6% since 2006. It is not profligacy as the German bankers suggest, it is that Italian products are becoming relatively more expensive than in similar countries. They want more austerity for the Italians -just the same recipe prescribed a few years ago to the Greeks. It won’t help though as the cause of stagnation is another one.
San Ta (North Country)
If Italy had its own currency, it could devalue to compensate for higher costs and improve its overall economic performance. As part of the currency union, all it can do is impose austerity. that is to create stagnation in the hope of reducing costs, although the costs in shattered lives doesn't show up in economic accounts.
Ken L (Atlanta)
Unless Italy elects leaders that are ideological purists, one would guess that the Italians and Europeans will work this out. What worries me more is that we in the U.S.A could find ourselves in a similar pickle in half a decade. Our debt is poised to grow to an unsustainable level, thanks to the 2017 tax cut. And we are slowly eroding the U.S. as a trusted partner in international cooperation. So today, investors flee stocks to the relative safety of U.S. Treasuries. What happens when those are no longer considered relatively safe?
Tom Magnum (Texas)
To answer your question about US treasuries; If U.S. Treasuries were less safe the interest rate would go up, but the rates went down. The U.S. ran one of the largest deficit surpluses in many years in April 2018. I don't know what will happen in Italy, but the tax cuts will have a beneficial effect on both the U.S. and the rest of the globe.
Woof (NY)
Interesting post by Jonas Goh The ECB (i.e. the Euro) buying of Italian bonds has allowed Italy to run up a debt that it otherwise could not have. For believers of stimulus spending, that's what was needed to get the Italian economy going. (Keynesians) For believers in austerity, that permitted an Italy to run up a ruinous debt. (Austrians) The major difference between the US and Europe is not the Euro but that Europe operates under implicit guarantee of bailing out member States that run up unsustainable debts. The precedent was set by Greece Not so in the US When 7 US states and two US territories went bankrupt at ~ 1841, as the result of running up unsustainable debts (mostly to British banks), Congress debated for 2 years their appeal to be bailed out by the Federal government . It decided not to do so "lest others be tempted to do the same". That set the precedent that no US States will be federally bailed out in the US should it fail to balance its books
Dan Coleman (San Francisco)
Yes, thus the famous 1976 headline "Ford to City: Drop Dead". On the other hand, the state and federal budgets are deeply intertwined, and there are massive federal subsidies that prop up the economies of states that have otherwise barely evolved since the Civil War. For example, every man, woman and child in my state contributes about $1,000 every year to the upkeep of AL, MS and other states whose local sheriffs spend their state-provided jail budgets on personal luxuries. Your state too. A German official said in the midst of the euro crisis "What if the U.S. government was to ask New York's taxpayers to support unemployed Floridians?", blissfully unaware that that's exactly what we do.
San Ta (North Country)
Hamilton had the new federal government take over the debts of states, much to the dismay of the states that had no debts. What happened in 1841 reversed what Hamilton accomplished. What Bush did in 2008 reversed the events to which you are referring. Now every financial institution is the US knows that Uncle Sam (or Sap) will underwrite risk-taking. No need to worry about "nationalization." Sad.
Charles (Clifton, NJ)
Thanks for the optimistic conclusion, Neil: "If things go badly in Italy, there’s no telling where the damage could end up." Well, here's hoping that things don't go badly in Italy. I suppose that if they start to go downhill, the EU will muster some remedial action. I just bought a great Italian tripod for my camera, so I'm doing my part. I can't spring for the Lamborghini, however.
uga muga (Miami Fl)
That's ok. Audi (VW) owns Lamborghini.
Neil M (Texas)
It's time to marvel at what our Founding Fathers brought about in America - so long ago. By creating a simple system of recognizing rights of individual States while also enabling a Federal Government - they created a true shining city on a hill. EU as it happens borrows our ideas but completely tramples them when it comes to State rights - by forcing a universal currency that is anything but universal. Money matters - not so much as wealth but as an identity of centuries - historic and practical. While Britain's decision on Brexit may be debatable, it's retention of British pound since the beginning - is looking like one bright note in this debacle. Stupidity is defined as doing the same wrong thing all over again and expecting a different result. Euro is that one stupidity put upon unsuspecting European countries by Germany which has benefited the most - but keeping this currency weak and helping German exports. I remember when Euro was introduced. With much fanfare, it was expected to soon eclipse mighty dollar. The Petro economy countries talked of switching prices to Euro. Euro was also supposed to foster cultural closeness of a European identity. Yet, EU is forced to create a program of a year long free travel for young Europeans to "feel majesty of EU." Well, we now know nothing is succeeding. It's time for Europeans to slowly dismantle this currency and let European countries decide their own future.
Martin (Amsterdam)
I suspect that there are many in your Lone Star State that feel similarly about the failed federalist experiment and universal currency forced on them in 1845. Us v Them goes a long way in politics, but is usually counterproductive on a larger scale in the longer term.
Hooj (London)
" ...tramples them when it comes to State rights - by forcing a universal currency..." Forgive me asking.... but are not all states of the US required to use the Dollar? Or unbeknown to me do some operate on the Peso, the Mark, or possibly the Rouble?
Tom Magnum (Texas)
From 1836 to 1845 Texas was an independent nation and did quite well in our terms in joining the U.S. A. It worked out.
Daniel Botsford (NH)
If the wealthy showed some commitment to the community in policy and wealth, a significant release of pressure would occur in the system.
Mike L (NY)
What’s obvious is that the world economy enriches the few at the expense of the many. The Euro is nothing more than a monetary scheme that will ultimately fail because there are too many countries tied to it. They often have different priorities and that will be the catalyst for the fall of the Euro. It was a feeble attempt by Europe to match the American dollar and it first it worked. But time has shown that the Euro is most likely to go extinct.
Hooj (London)
"It was a feeble attempt by Europe to match the American dollar and it first it worked. But time has shown that the Euro is most likely to go extinct." Why? The different states of the US could not be more divergent, politically, religiously, socially, and economically, and have radically different objective Given this why is the Euro bad and the Dollar good? Why is the Euro going to go extinct but the Dollar survive to eternity? A bit of introspection and humility would not come amiss.
Jonas Goh (Seoul South korea)
As any economic textbook says European Union is not an optimal currency area. If economic conditions are differ among European nations crack is likely to appear in Europe. Germany might need austerity while Italy needs devalued currency to compensate for slack in demand in domestic market. The euro might become a yoke for many Italians as monetary policy is determined in Germany and not in Italy. I just watch carefully wondering what this will bring to the world.
Hooj (London)
Alternatively .. 'As any economic textbook says the USA is not an optimal currency area. If economic conditions are differ among states cracks are likely to appear in America.' There are huge variations in the viability of different states. The Dollar manages fine. I don't understand why Americans think that the Euro is somehow different, why they think states working together is a futile idea. Do you distrust the formation of your own country so much?
Jonathan (Oronoque)
@Hooj - The answer is simple - the Federal government is supreme, and can tell the states what to do. In Europe, nobody can tell anyone what to do.