Fishing for Stories via Instagram

Apr 18, 2018 · 18 comments
Erin Lyons (Shaftsbury, Vermont)
As an avid female angler, I'm excited by how much hashtags for women in the sport have changed this year alone. The new tag #lessskinmorefin sums it all up: it's becoming less acceptable to post photos of women in teeny bikinis (or less) holding up giant, suffering fish. But a quick comparison of #womenwhofish vs. #girlswhofish shows there is still a long way to go in the sexualization of women on the water. I was at a loss when I wanted to tag pics of the 10-year-old girls who won our local fishing derby last year. I learned about #keepemwet from Heather Hodson of #unitedwomenonthefly – and we had a great giggle about the double entendre for women who fish when we met in person after several likes exchanged on Instagram. I've also made wonderful male fishing buddies IRL via Instagram and received great encouragement from male anglers on my posts – many of whom have opposite political views from me. I won't discount how much my gender identity plays a role in my likes, but it does make me feel more welcome in a sport that has been traditionally dominated by upper middle-class white men. I applaud #5050onthewater and also hope we can expand on that soon with less of a gender binary. And I agree with the other commenters that Instagram is antithetical to the solitary raison-d'etre of our sport, but I think that when it opens doors for new generations and spreads awareness of conservation practices and policy, it's a net positive for all. (Terrible fishing pun intended.)
Heidy (Chicago)
A good article but if they are doing it wrong a very important thing that their maintenance of the fish is that it is so out of the water since with bare hands or without protection you will damage the protective layer of the fish since they can not live without That is because if you were to release them, they are apparently unharmed.
Richard M Lidzbarski (Portland, Ore)
You're doing it wrong. Holding the fish like that out of the water, with bare hands, damages the fish's protective slimy coating. They cannot live without it. Even if released to swim away seemingly unharmed, those two fish will likely die. Please stop doing this and learn to fish properly. Richard M Lidzbarski Portland, OR
Joseph Barca (long island Ny)
@Richard M Lidzbarski I completely agree with you Mr.Lidzbarski. Being an angler myself and after doing some research into fish health this 100% true. Altho I am quite glad that fishing is on the rise and I do get to share a hobby of mine with other people. It is unfortunate that people arent educated on how to properly handle fish they catch. I hope that with a rise of fishing, there will also be a rise of sealife education, safe handling, and care for all the wonderful creatures of the sea.
Kne'Vaughn Dean (New York City)
@Richard M Lidzbarski. Honestly, it's always good to learn about safety and preservation of sea life and pass knowledge down to others, but being judgemental towards those practicing the sport is not the way to do it. That know it all attitude will sooner turn people off from the sport than make it better. Whether or not your knowledge is accurate, maybe take a lighter approach instead of coming down on others. Trust me, it makes a difference.
Kne'Vaughn Dean (New York City)
@Joseph Barca For your future angling endeavours, I also wish to leave you with some knowledge of my own. Based on my own experience, baiting with eel specifically seems to attract more fish as opposed to many other creatures.
John R (Oregon)
The "grip and grin hero shot" is indeed on the rise. For most serious and thoughtful anglers, though, it's pretty much an object of scorn.
The Iconoclast (Oregon)
Yeah, kill all the fish, cool!
Rob U. (America)
The poor fish. I have no doubt that many of them die as a result of this unwanted contact with humans. There's just no respect for nature anymore.
ArnThor (NOR)
what's your basis for assuming they die?
Matt (Chicago)
The fish can be caught and released and go on...provides they are quickly landed and released with best practices. What kills these fish are dams and salmon farms...
chris (usa)
Then there many who fish for the solitude of being in remote surroundings and getting away from the hustle and bustle. We marvel at the vistas and the experience of embracing nature and the serenity of a pristine environment unspoiled by man. I find it at odds to tarnish the experience with thoughts of something such as "social media".
Irv (Virginia)
I completely agree and sympathize with you, Chris. I've been fishing for close to 50 years - first in the surf and then 43 years ago discovered fly fishing and the impossibly marvelous world of the mountain free stone streams of northern Pennsylvania - exactly where is a closely held secret. Not anymore! Fly fishing has become a trendy, yuppified fashion show and now with the popularity of social media it's just another form of our egocentric culture's obsession with the selfie. I will now concentrate my angling efforts on a species much closer to home - the renowned small mouthed bass and a couple of magnificent rivers just a step outside my front door that the yuppies haven't discovered and my fellow red-necks still can glory in the overwhelming beautify and peace of fishing in solitude. Tight lines!
Matt (Chicago)
Many in the angling community have mixed feelings about this phenomenon of posting pics. Fishing - fly or other - can be personal, a great way to bond with friends, or a way to get away from grid, or all of the above, etc. I was disappointed the first article didn't cover both sides of the debate, and then to publish another and not get into topics like conservation and the corresponding pressures that comes with posting is a disservice. To suggest that fishing is a great uniter in face of much politicization without mentioning current EPA policy shift, the fact that there is legislation in congress now, etc. is weak. While I'd like to think that the social element can facilitate positive outcomes on topics like protecting resources - I'll hold judgment given the rest of what we're seeing. Keep 'em wet https://www.keepemwet.org/
Lemar (CoastalDweller)
Many have mixed feelings? Just how many? I'm curious. The premise of the article was a a question about how big the fishing crowd is on Instagram—that was answered. Now I'm wondering how big it is on FB (quick FB search revealed a lot of fish sites and I got tired of scrolling after 75 under "fishing groups"). While I'm not much of a social media aficionado, if it can be used to bring people with common interests together (and yes regardless of political stripe) and open conversation about conservation, local water issues, protecting resources, correct the current legislative shift as you mention, and support small businesses and local entrepreneurs (emphasis small and local), and educate folks, then that's a good thing IMHO. Fishing continues to be a great source of relaxation and a great teacher of patience (fly fishing in particular) and every now and then I catch dinner. I'm OK with sharing the waters and a happy-faced snapshot. BTW, really enjoyed the "keepemwet" site–grandpa taught me that when I was a kid–I thought everybody knew that.
Ricardo de la O (Montevideo)
What fun steelhead are to catch.
Tp (maine)
Rich people fishing. Not real fishermen.
DLP (Austin)
Dang, Tp. Pretty harsh. The beauty of fishing is that the fish don’t know how much money you make. They only know if your fly is in the right spot, moving appropriately and if gets stuck in their lip. If the amount of money the fisherman has might change where they fish and what they fish with, but you seem to care more about the money than the fish. Fishing is for everyone and if you take a picture-who cares! (I guess you do). DLP