He defended Chris Christie!! That's enough for me to say no thank you.
2
Why is the NYT calling Wray Trump's nominee for "his" FBI director? Is the FBI director not "our" public servant?
1
Comey had a career in law enforcement and public service, not politics. When Trump asked him, as FBI Director, for an unconstitutional loyalty pledge, he refused and was fired.
Based on Trump’s well established record, we can assume that Trump made the same request of his replacement appointee as FBI Director, Christopher Wray, and that Wray agreed. Remember, Wray already had a career in partisan conservative politics: His Wikipedia article states, “Wray acted as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's personal attorney during the (highly political and partisan) Bridgegate scandal. During the scandal, defense attorneys for a pair of Christie's inner circle sought access to Christie's missing cellphone. Two years later, the phone turned up in Wray's possession.”
Thus, Wray is dangerously partisan. He already served as defense attorney for a politician, a Trump ally, in a highly partisan, controversial case.
Simply put, if he is nominated, we will not have a constitutional FBI Director due to the unconstitutional pledge the evidence suggests that he likely made to Trump. Democracy gives us the right to make decisions and act on our best information. Trump probably asked for the pledge verbally, with no record. Therefore, we have a right to decide based on Wray’s past partisan record.
Trump wants private attorney loyalty. The only appointee from Trump for FBI Director that we should accept is one with strong credentials AND no prior service in political cases.
Based on Trump’s well established record, we can assume that Trump made the same request of his replacement appointee as FBI Director, Christopher Wray, and that Wray agreed. Remember, Wray already had a career in partisan conservative politics: His Wikipedia article states, “Wray acted as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's personal attorney during the (highly political and partisan) Bridgegate scandal. During the scandal, defense attorneys for a pair of Christie's inner circle sought access to Christie's missing cellphone. Two years later, the phone turned up in Wray's possession.”
Thus, Wray is dangerously partisan. He already served as defense attorney for a politician, a Trump ally, in a highly partisan, controversial case.
Simply put, if he is nominated, we will not have a constitutional FBI Director due to the unconstitutional pledge the evidence suggests that he likely made to Trump. Democracy gives us the right to make decisions and act on our best information. Trump probably asked for the pledge verbally, with no record. Therefore, we have a right to decide based on Wray’s past partisan record.
Trump wants private attorney loyalty. The only appointee from Trump for FBI Director that we should accept is one with strong credentials AND no prior service in political cases.
3
Remember, Wray withheld evidence for two years, the cell phone, in a highly partisan case. That is not integrity.
There are many U.S. Attorneys who have not had significant roles in partisan politics. The article lists many of Wray’s partisan activities. Given that plus the partisan demands that Trump makes of his appointees, Wray is a bad choice to allow this president to make.
The only FBI nominee from Trump that we should agree to is a public servant with no significant record of partisan activity.
There are many U.S. Attorneys who have not had significant roles in partisan politics. The article lists many of Wray’s partisan activities. Given that plus the partisan demands that Trump makes of his appointees, Wray is a bad choice to allow this president to make.
The only FBI nominee from Trump that we should agree to is a public servant with no significant record of partisan activity.
2
The first order of business of Chris Wray, Trump's nominee for Director of the FBI, will be to fire special Counselor Robert Mueller. His appointment was conditional of slavishly doing Trump's bidding.
Looks like a good pick. If the only issue is he was hired to represent Christie, that is no big deal. He was a private attorney and that was his job to defend clients. That he is republican is to be expected. If that upsets the far, far left then they need to come back to planet earth or stop taking LSD. Seems like a moderate, center leaning Republican that is fairly non political. Improvement from the wack job Comey! Comey was totally political and self absorbed. I like that Wray is know for being calm and low key. Nice change from these grandstanding morons like Comey. I have to say, with a lump in my throat, good job Trump.
Yes, a good pick. Will ensure nothing the fbi does will impact trump.
I wonder how good he will be at investigating grifters and treason in the White House?
4
I'm not comfortable with someone picked from a law firm tied to Trump's family real estate, who was a defense attorney representing Christie in the scandalous "Bridgegate" and who was only employed two years in the Justice Department. And with so much controversy in Trump's administration, my suspicion is piqued.
1
King & Spalding represent the Russian oil company Rosneft, the one that stands to benefit if US sanctions are removed. King & Spalding have an office in Moscow. They are lobbyist for the fossil fuel interests in this country, and they have handled Trump's "Trust" for his children to handle the Trump 'businesses' whilst DJT is 'President'.
This is a conflict of interest choice?
This is a conflict of interest choice?
4
Maybe the Presidents buddy, Chris Christie will become Trump's messenger for telling Wray what Trump does and doesn't want the FBI to investigate. Like Trump's other unofficial go-betweens, to the Russians, for example, this ploy would let Trump obstruct justice without exposing him to any suspicion that he is behaving the same way toward Wray as he did toward Comey.
Does Wray have the political savvy and the professional backbone to resist this kind of ploy? How close is Wray to Christie?
Let's hope that the confirmation hearing delves into this.
Does Wray have the political savvy and the professional backbone to resist this kind of ploy? How close is Wray to Christie?
Let's hope that the confirmation hearing delves into this.
1
NJ residents would not agree that this is a mainstream pick. Wray was Gov Christie's attorney in the Bridgegate scandal. Not exactly nonpartisan. Or the kind of attorney who would say "no" to this president.
2
President Trump lacks confidence. He was spot on about Comey right from the beginning (noted in several Tweets) then Trump doubted himself and kept the Drama Queen Comey on board. I mean what Real Man 6'8" cries to the media, "Don't leave me alone with the President." And lastly, the FBI Only does investigation -- they do Not make Judgmental Decisions as Comey did in reference to Clinton's dangerous use of non governmental email servers. THAT job of whether their should have been a Special Prosecution of the matter is up to the Attorney General and or the Department of Justice. Therefore, Comey is Not fit for the position he held. And Comeys response as to why he did not make public that Trump was not being investigated over the Russian connection was not because Comey was afraid he'd later have to recant his statement -- as Comey could have said: Currently, President Trump is not under investigation...I can't stand that Comey. He's worse than a sewer rat. At least they don't CRAVE attention. Comey has some serious mental issues which most of America cannot see. And he's using Our time and resources fulfilling his irrational needs.
1
From New Jersey: The fact that this lawyer, Christopher Wray, represented Christie in the Bridgegate Case. he should not be considered for this position.
3
I didn't see anything in this article about the fact that the law firm Wray works for also represents Russia's state oil companies and also The Trump Organization.
1
Christopher Wray gets bonus points for having Putin's pet oil company, Rosneft, and Gazprom as clients. So, yes, in some ways he is PERFECTLY qualified as a nominee by this President. From Russia With Love.
2
The best choice we can expect and hopefully a wise one. Messrs. Nancy and Faiz have their own agendas and their criticisms, therefore, are no surprise. Any success he may have had in defending or counseling anyone is something to be welcomed as it is indicative of his professional prowess as is his reported peer approval.
I think he lost his reputation when he defended Christie. Further, maybe he should explain how Christie's phone (material evidence in Bridgegate) came to be in his possession.
2
Here's my question to Mr Wray: Have you been asked to pledge your loyalty to Donald Trump, and if so, have you done so? If he asks for it in the future, will you do so?
2
A man who knows how to "make it go away." Kept Chris Christy out of the soup.
1
Poor guy. Who will work for an almost impeached administration.
1
I hope Democrats can muster the energy to vote no but I think they will go along just because someone "worse" may be nominated.
3
Defending guilty as sin Chris Christie and throwing his underlings under the bus to save Christie, all without barfing up his lunch at what he was doing is not much in the way of a sterling recommendation. With thirty five thousand dollars in Republican candidate contributions which face it, is tucked into his resume, along with legal services to the Trump organization as the frosting on this cake, calling him non-political and neutral is a reach. This is a party loyal Trump insider simply cashing in his chips.
9
If you think 35 grand can buy a Northeastern lawyer's loyalty for life, you are definitely not close friends with the Clintons or the Obamas.
1
I'm sure that less than a month from now, Trump will be on Twitter telling everyone that Christopher Wray is "a real nut job". I don't trust anything this President does or says, and it's extremely difficult to trust anyone he appoints to any position.
4
enptywheel (Marcy Wheeler) has some concerns about Wray's past under the bush administration, eespecially his keeping Ashcroft informed of investigations into his associates. (She keeps amazing records of her research.)
See her post on that here: https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/06/07/trump-fbi-nominee-christopher-wray...
See her post on that here: https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/06/07/trump-fbi-nominee-christopher-wray...
2
If confirmed, he should be asked to resign as soon as Trump is out of office.
6
Did he kiss the ring and pledge loyalty?
Is he on the payroll of the Mercer family?
Is he on the payroll of the Mercer family?
5
He sounds like a good choice, I just wish he had no Eau De Trump cologne about him.
2
Landry He was stinky before Trump. Do your research!
1
This morning, I thought it was a good choice after reading the brief article, but Holy Cow! It seems like Trump is inbred with federal prosecutors all over his record. There was Christie, Sessions and Giuliani who helped get him elected in addition to Comey who threw the election. They are all former federal prosecutors. It's a Mafia.
5
He defended Christie in 'Bridgegate'? That in itself ruins it for me. Shady shady shady.
10
Casinos, Christie, Wray...see the connection?
6
The there's news from Capitol Hill. Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the head of the National Security Agency said: “I have never been directed to do anything I believe to be illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate."
Call it the incredible shrinking scandal! Next time, when Trump really crosses a line, the public will yawn at the spectacle of the Democrats crying wolf again.
Call it the incredible shrinking scandal! Next time, when Trump really crosses a line, the public will yawn at the spectacle of the Democrats crying wolf again.
3
...based just on this article, Wray looks like a trump stooge.
7
I didn't realize initially that Wray had worked for Trump and defended Christie. This might not end up as smooth as it looked this morning.
6
i'm not sure why we would want a criminal defense attorney in charge of a law enforcement organization.
5
Betty, Excellent point! Definitely an oxymoron.
Sorry, but anybody at this point who is nominated by and accepts the position from Trump is in my eyes compromised.
Trump worked on his reputation during his to date presidency (and before...)
Trump worked on his reputation during his to date presidency (and before...)
2
and this is the man who was holding on to the cell phone that Christie say he could not find. hmm
8
"Hours after the Twitter post, the White House followed up with an official statement in which Mr. Trump called Mr. Wray “an impeccably qualified individual,”"
How many impeccably qualified individuals has Mr. Trump selected thus far?
How many impeccably qualified individuals has Mr. Trump selected thus far?
5
Mr. Wray's specialty is defending white-collar business people against government investigations. Has the President nominated someone to lead the FBI (you know, the agency most responsible for dealing with domestic terrorism, for example) or to be a loyal supporter? Is it a "mainstream, safe" choice by a President who is governing under a cloud of suspicion? I don't think so.
1
I guess the only question I would have is that I heard a report that during the Bridge-gate trial Christie's aides wanted Chris Christie to produce his cell phone and he said he didn't know where it was and it turned out to be in Wray's possession.
9
Isn't there a conflict of interest? A lawyer for the Trump organization to run the FBI that is in the mist of investigating Trump?
6
well, wray already has experience working for a despotic, bullying, truth-challenged, thoroughly unsuccessful public official. trump will be more of the same.
4
I wonder if he gave a pledge of loyalty to Trump?
4
At this point in 45's "presidency" I've learned that anything he likes, supports, considers "excellent; tremendous, the best" is suspect. There is no way that 45 would consider a person for this position who might look at him and his daily antics with a clear, objective perspective instead of some sort of fawning "loyalty."
3
I know it’s unfair, but anybody who agrees to work for Trump is automatically suspect in my mind. What’s the scam? As McMaster is finding out, and Spicer et al. found out a while ago, Trump is the kiss of death as far as reputation, integrity and overall character are concerned, which is why he has trouble finding candidates. Maybe at this moment just before Mr. Comey’s committee appearance, Trump realizes he has to do something that doesn’t appear crazy, and went against his natural instincts. But I hope senators during the confirmation process dig, dig, dig. With Trump, more often than not, if it appears it's on the up-and-up, it only means you haven’t looked deeply enough yet.
5
The President has made his choice and now the Senate only has to do its job and confirm Christopher Wray in a timely matter. That means the minority should confess they haven't the votes or more importantly they must confess they haven't any reason other than they can't stand the President to confirm this pick.
Christie's missing phone?
3
Christie headed Trump’s transition team for months before he was cleared of criminal prosecution. Did Mr. Wray have attorney- client privilege with Christie while Christie was head of the Trump transition team? If so when did that expire?
Was the cell phone episode ethical?
Do some of Mr. Wray’s partners administer the Trump Trust? Do others in Moscow advise Rosneft the Russian oil company ?! -- ( sanctions, Citigo)
With any other president this man's credentials would not be questioned but these are dark times.
Was the cell phone episode ethical?
Do some of Mr. Wray’s partners administer the Trump Trust? Do others in Moscow advise Rosneft the Russian oil company ?! -- ( sanctions, Citigo)
With any other president this man's credentials would not be questioned but these are dark times.
2
We're going to see his tax returns, correct?
4
Have to have to wonder about judgement of anyone who willingly signs up to work with Trump. Let's hope Wray loves America more than his job title.
I wonder if he got the job because he gave trump a loyalty pledge? That seems to be trump's only requirement in an underling. And trump thinks everyone is an underling.
1
Chris Christie's lawyer. What more do you need to know?
3
The question that must be asked (and answered) during his confirmation hearing:
"How will you respond if and when the president requests loyalty to anything other than your oath of office?"
"How will you respond if and when the president requests loyalty to anything other than your oath of office?"
2
Wray must be giving "total loyalty"...
1
And Sean Spicer, like the rest of the Executive branch, and congress, too, learned of this from a twitter. Sad.
3
So Wray's firm of King and Spalding, "advises" or "does legal work for" the Trump family, and is "employed by Russian gas and oil companies, including the state-owned Rosneft", and defended Trump's transition director Chris Christie?
The fix is in.
The fix is in.
9
It is alway sad where you work in a quality organization doing difficult work and when it comes time to pick a new head, the choice is from the outside. I feel badly for the bright intelligent and hard working FBI employees who sometimes risk their lives and have great credentials to be passed over for the new leader.
19
Trump has picked another winner.
Wiki: Christopher Wray.
The last 2 sentences under "Private law practice" says it all.
" During the [Bridgegate] scandal, defense attorneys for a pair of Christie's inner circle sought access to Christie's missing cellphone. Two years later, the phone turned up in Wray's possession."
Oh, yes, Trump can sure pick 'em.
This one will go far.
Wiki: Christopher Wray.
The last 2 sentences under "Private law practice" says it all.
" During the [Bridgegate] scandal, defense attorneys for a pair of Christie's inner circle sought access to Christie's missing cellphone. Two years later, the phone turned up in Wray's possession."
Oh, yes, Trump can sure pick 'em.
This one will go far.
23
Hopefully NYT will run a full and complete story detailing the role played by Christie's defence counsel in "concealing" Christie's cell phone. What I remember reading at the time left me believing that this lawyer, now nominated as FBI Director, was ethically challenged and his actions at least warranted an investigation by the State Bar.
17
He's a defense lawyer for white collar criminals. Just what Trump needs right now.
23
How on earth is hiring a lawyer who is an old buddy of Mr. Christie supposed to be an unbiased, mainstream choice?
17
Wray hid Christie's cell phone so that pertinent text messages could not be used against Christie in the Bridgegate scandal. How is he "of impeccable credentials" to be head of the FBI?
25
Where is J. Edgar Hoover, when we need him? Is there another man like him to lead the FBI? Where can he be found? And we’ll take Clyde Tolson, or his modern counterpart, too.
1
Another candidate more than willing to throw away their ethics
14
Another Mr. Toad . The inept and corruptible leading the inept and corruptible.
2
Does Donald understand Congress is part of his government? Why wouldn't he vet the nominee with Republican leadership? And why wouldn't they complain that he didn't?
This artificial pax republica is not leadership. Congress is abandoning it's constitutional role in checking the executive. They're afraid of him.
This artificial pax republica is not leadership. Congress is abandoning it's constitutional role in checking the executive. They're afraid of him.
13
I can see hiring Wray as a personal attorney with experience in
defending elected officials who lie and leverage public resources like
the George Washington Bridge (Bridgegate) for political vengeance.
But no one is served by turning a federal resource like the FBI into
a personal political instrument...both defensive wall and political
offensive on enemies.
defending elected officials who lie and leverage public resources like
the George Washington Bridge (Bridgegate) for political vengeance.
But no one is served by turning a federal resource like the FBI into
a personal political instrument...both defensive wall and political
offensive on enemies.
9
well,well, another puppy dog in the Trump Kennel of howling hounds, Judy tugging at the leash t do the Master's business.
Since Mr.Wray has experience in litigating some of Trump's real estate and family s affairs, he is then well-versed in Trump's playbook ; and,he knows how Trump thinks.
If Mr.Wray is confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Wray should learn Russian, in order to further his boss's agenda for the Trump family.
Since Mr.Wray has experience in litigating some of Trump's real estate and family s affairs, he is then well-versed in Trump's playbook ; and,he knows how Trump thinks.
If Mr.Wray is confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Wray should learn Russian, in order to further his boss's agenda for the Trump family.
At this point there is no one that Trump appoints that will refuse taking allegiance to him. Trump is a paranoid, narcissistic proven crook. He has to demand loyalty to himself first and foremost. So can any of his appointees be trusted to put the public ahead of Trump? No!
12
Well, if Trump says his creds are "impeccable," we can be sure of one thing: they probably are almost the exact opposite.
21
Wait. So Trump has just nominated the head of the FBI from King & Spaulding? The same law firm that represents the Trump Organization? The same firm that he hired to separate out his business assets in January, a move which raised ethical questions from watchdog groups?
23
I can't quite get past the part about him being Chris Christie's personal attorney and defending the soon-to-be former governor in Bridgegate.
14
I would love to know how many people turned down this job before it was accepted by Wray. Was he asked for, or did he offer, loyalty to this president? Was that the price he paid for this appointment? So many have said no to appointments in this administration, anyone who says yes has to be looked at very closely.
16
One has to wonder about the psyche of someone who would willingly sign on to be a member of the hot smoking mess that Trump calls his administration. It would be like signing on as the coal stoker on the Titanic after it had hit the iceberg.
13
Trump should recuse himself from picking a nominee. In other words, I don't trust anyone he nominates and anyone who would say yes to him.
15
Edward, we are in the biggest mess in US history. Trump makes Nixon's improprieties look like 'Denise the Menace'
Asking question about ethics related to this Administration sounds comical, but isn't this an ethical conflict of interest with his law firm's Trump Organization representation?
7
Wray's appointment is Trump's next move to disembowel the FBI itself, the same way the EPA is being gutted, removing all remnants of its investigation into his Russian connections. Expect funding cuts, resignations and dismissals. Doubtless this cleansing is already afoot with the deliberate sabotaging of all related records throughout the entire administration. Of course this shouldn't come as a surprise ... it's right out of senior advisor Bannon's so-called de-institutionalization playbook.
9
Everything about the TRUMP brand is tawdry and grasping. I wouldn't want it on my resume. Why does he?
6
We should assume that anyone employed by this White House has chosen to pledge his or her loyalty to Trump rather than the United States Constitution.
7
That he filled the slot at all is what is surprising.
I assumed that DT would just leave this vacant, like he has the other 200-plus important management jobs across the federal government.
8
I just read Comey's prepared testimony and I'm persuaded he was a snake who deserved to be fired. Comey promised Trump his "honest loyalty." Now we find out that Trump candidly told Comey repeatedly that it would be helpful to the Administration's ability to get business done, if the FBI announced, as was true, that the President wasn't personally under investigation. Comey repeatedly and intentionally did not tell the President that he didn't want to make that announcement, not because it wasn't true, but because he felt it would create a "duty to correct" in the event that the FBI did begin to investigate Trump personally. I look forward to Comey's answer tomorrow when he was asked why he didn't provide that explanation to the President, his boss.
no public official should pledge loyalty to his boss, but only to the constitution and our system of government.
2
I was hoping that President will nominate a person with identical background and law enforcement as Edgar Hoover. Mr. Hoover was a man with a clean record serving the US Government after his graduation from high school in Washington DC and later received his legal education from George Washington University. Many Americans did not like him but he was very dedicated to his FBI job. He never worked for any private law firms or Walls Street firms. He loved his FBI job from beginning to the end.
4
You need to read a bit more about Hoover.
2
he was a twisted individual who kept his job by using fbi files to blackmail politicians. for fbi agents, he was an abusive boss. not to mention a racist who hated women.
2
My guess is that he will fit right in with the rest of the loyalists appointed by trump.
2
Hopefully Christopher Wray will be a better FBI Director than James Comey. Mr. Comey will not be missed.
I hope during is confirmation hearing he is asked, under oath, if Trump asked him to pledge his loyalty to him. If Trump did ask him that then what was his answer? And if there is a conflict between remaining loyal to Trump and fulfilling the duties of the office of FBI Director what would he do?
4
Did Trump ask Wray if Wray could guarantee loyalty to Trump?
Is that why Trump nominated Wray?
Is that why Trump nominated Wray?
6
Here are additional facts that should concern people (aside from his representation of Christie) regarding his affiliation with King & Spalding:
According to Newsweek: Another partner at the law firm, Bobby Burchfield, is ethics adviser to the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, which holds the president’s assets.
Newsweek reports Trump picked a third King & Spalding partner, Gilbert Kaplan, to be his secretary of commerce for international trade in the Department of Commerce and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats once worked for the firm.
He will likely face questions as to whether he ever provided services for the trust or Trump Organization because of an executive order signed by Trump that says presidential appointees can’t “participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients,” according to Newsweek.
According to Newsweek: Another partner at the law firm, Bobby Burchfield, is ethics adviser to the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, which holds the president’s assets.
Newsweek reports Trump picked a third King & Spalding partner, Gilbert Kaplan, to be his secretary of commerce for international trade in the Department of Commerce and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats once worked for the firm.
He will likely face questions as to whether he ever provided services for the trust or Trump Organization because of an executive order signed by Trump that says presidential appointees can’t “participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients,” according to Newsweek.
6
Why is the NY Times repeating the right wing propaganda that this man is a "good choice" and not another unqualified Republican who is willing to do whatever Trump demands of his "employees"?
When it came to protecting Chris Christie, Christopher Wray decided the law didn't apply to his client. And when it comes to protecting Donald Trump, no doubt Christopher Wray has pledged the same fealty to his "client".
When it came to protecting Chris Christie, Christopher Wray decided the law didn't apply to his client. And when it comes to protecting Donald Trump, no doubt Christopher Wray has pledged the same fealty to his "client".
6
Will he be willing to be in a room alone with Trump? If yes...disqualified
9
Just as expected, Trump's rash decisions made at odd hours. Seems like signs of walls closing in keep him up!
And here we have finally, another inexperienced pick with some mucky history (reference to Christie) at classic Trump timing. Toddler-in-Chief has thrown us yet another distraction to deflect from what's coming tomorrow. He wants everyone talking and focused on Wray to ease the inevitable close attention to Comey Day!
CANNOT WAIT!
And here we have finally, another inexperienced pick with some mucky history (reference to Christie) at classic Trump timing. Toddler-in-Chief has thrown us yet another distraction to deflect from what's coming tomorrow. He wants everyone talking and focused on Wray to ease the inevitable close attention to Comey Day!
CANNOT WAIT!
6
Two huge red flags with this appointment:
- Wray's long association with Chris Christie, probably the most corrupt and incompetent NJ governor ever;
- Wray's law firm King & Spalding's clients include Russian gas & oil companies - pretty convenient as investigations into Trump's Russian ties are underway.
Does anyone - anyone - believe Trump would pick someone who can be impeccably impartial and apolitical - and pursue the Russian investigations with all due diligence, no matter where they may lead?
- Wray's long association with Chris Christie, probably the most corrupt and incompetent NJ governor ever;
- Wray's law firm King & Spalding's clients include Russian gas & oil companies - pretty convenient as investigations into Trump's Russian ties are underway.
Does anyone - anyone - believe Trump would pick someone who can be impeccably impartial and apolitical - and pursue the Russian investigations with all due diligence, no matter where they may lead?
12
As reporter Matt Katz is pointing out, Wray held onto the cell phone Chris Christie used during Bridgegate and never let go. Was never obtained by feds.
Seems like obstruction.
Seems like obstruction.
11
Apparently decent pick, but his experience is more on the criminal rather than the counterintelligence side. If the priority is on terrorism, then he should have picked a guy/girl with more counterintelligence credentials.
2
He worked for Comey at the Justice Dept, of course this was timed so that Comey could praise this nomination tomorrow. It's impressive that he went from being a regular working federal attorney at the District level to be the associate deputy attorney general when Comey was Deputy Attorney General. Contrary what many comments are saying he won't oversee the investigation into Russian election interference - that's Mueller's job. By the way NYT, why no coverage of Rachel Brand as the new Associate Attorney General ?
2
Anyone associated with Chris Christie is not worthy, but then again, this whole administration is an unworthy group.
9
A good principled selection.
2
Why not call Saul?
8
Why Christopher Wray?
Did Eric Trump decline the offer?
Did Eric Trump decline the offer?
8
How can someone who helped Chris Christie get out of his bridge scandal be of "impeccable" character?
18
Isn't it ironic that we say we want apolitical people like Wray to head the FBI when that person's boss under a Dem is always the most loyal political operator available to the Democratic Party elites?
Other than with the liberal Nixon, the GOP Attorneys General picks are the more experienced lawyer and prosecutor that can be found, and we rarely hear of them again. But Dem picks for AG leave a trail of criminal question marks behind them for years.
Other than with the liberal Nixon, the GOP Attorneys General picks are the more experienced lawyer and prosecutor that can be found, and we rarely hear of them again. But Dem picks for AG leave a trail of criminal question marks behind them for years.
2
On what basis can you say that Wray is "apolitical?" There is no supporting evidence for that statement. In fact, all evidence is to the contrary.
2
"Bridge Gate" meets "Everything Gate". A meeting, not of two minds, but of one mind, and one walnut.
9
At this point, any selection and appointment by the lame duck, fake president is tainted.
I'm sure Mitch McConnell would agree that it should be for the next president to decide.
I'm sure Mitch McConnell would agree that it should be for the next president to decide.
11
So first question did The President ask him for Personal loyalty and did he offer it?
5
All of Trump's appointees are tainted by his requests for loyalty oaths to him personally. All of Trump's appointees should be questioned carefully by the Senate as to what oaths or assurances of loyalty to Trump they have been asked for or given. Mr Wray should be no exception.
13
Wray's credentials and the Republican plaudits are irrelevant. Everyone knows that the mere fact that he was acceptable to Trump raises a huge red flag. Trump demands loyalty above all else. If Wray passed Trump's litmus test, his independence is in serious doubt!
11
At least he picked someone who has a background working with law enforcement. Hopefully Mr Wray will remember that his duty is to his country not the President. The FBI needs to remain above the fray. Their job is to investigate crime and protect average everyday Americans.
6
The Times writes, "Wray is said to be low-key and principled." The other title reads, "Trump picks Christopher Wray ..."
How or to what extent is this an unacceptable and unworkable oxymoron? In plain terms, what should a principled and competent person do if asked to serve in this administration? If such people simply assist Mr. Trump in becoming more effective, how could that be a good thing? His present plans and priorities are cruel, destructive and based on falsehoods. Could such a person hope to modify Trump's fundamental notions? All evidence is to the contrary. Trump invariably and inevitably compromises such people. The Republicans with their unpopular plans are talking into one ear. Mr. Bannon with his populist plans for destruction and mayhem are speaking into the other ear. Under such circumstances, could anybody no matter how principled or competent do any good at all?
How or to what extent is this an unacceptable and unworkable oxymoron? In plain terms, what should a principled and competent person do if asked to serve in this administration? If such people simply assist Mr. Trump in becoming more effective, how could that be a good thing? His present plans and priorities are cruel, destructive and based on falsehoods. Could such a person hope to modify Trump's fundamental notions? All evidence is to the contrary. Trump invariably and inevitably compromises such people. The Republicans with their unpopular plans are talking into one ear. Mr. Bannon with his populist plans for destruction and mayhem are speaking into the other ear. Under such circumstances, could anybody no matter how principled or competent do any good at all?
5
Mr. Wray,
You have the opportunity to restore your party's reputation in the way a few Republicans in Nixon's era never lost sight of justice or the truth. Or you can go down as another flak for Trump. Your move.
You have the opportunity to restore your party's reputation in the way a few Republicans in Nixon's era never lost sight of justice or the truth. Or you can go down as another flak for Trump. Your move.
27
Yay! Now Congress can grill him during his confirmation hearings about hiding Chris Christie's personal cell phone from Bridgegate investigators. Mmm, I can smell the meat a-cookin'.
8
Tho' I fall into the rabidly anti-Trump camp, and this guy's politics are definitely not mine, the stuff that is being thrown at him here is - Trumpish. If you suspect it it must be so? If you want it to be so, then there's no reason to seek evidence? Not so. And there seems to be little acceptance of the fact that attorneys do represent clients.
I wasn't paying attention at the time, but it seems to me that Christie wasn't exactly universally loathed( he had a lot of respect, except o.c. from the Kushner family) when he was a federal prosecutor, which is when they became acquainted.
It stands to reason that Christie would hire someone whose work he knew to be top notch. It isn't surprising that a former comrade would say yes when asked. it says nothing about their current relationship; nothing about what Wray may actually think.
He isn't Trump. And he doesn't owe Trump a thing.
I wasn't paying attention at the time, but it seems to me that Christie wasn't exactly universally loathed( he had a lot of respect, except o.c. from the Kushner family) when he was a federal prosecutor, which is when they became acquainted.
It stands to reason that Christie would hire someone whose work he knew to be top notch. It isn't surprising that a former comrade would say yes when asked. it says nothing about their current relationship; nothing about what Wray may actually think.
He isn't Trump. And he doesn't owe Trump a thing.
3
I think the rank and file FBI investigators voiced virtually unanimous support for Comey for one main reason... they knew he had their backs. I wonder how they'll feel about this defense lawyer that got Christie off by throwing his subordinates under the bus.
16
Question for Mr Wray: what was on Christie's phone that was so bad it had to be "lost".
17
I know little of Mr. Wray - only what I have read here. I do not give weight to his past relationships. He is, after all, an attorney. I am relieved that Mr. Trump stepped outside his coterie of loyalists and chose someone qualified, to whatever extent, for the role of Director of the F.B.I. I cannot, however, cease to be suspicious of the motives of anyone who would take a job in this administration.
4
June 7, 2017
This is my wife, my god, my goddesses and now my FBI can I get any greater than Richard Nixon? They're going to love me at the FBI because I am the greatest - so America forget Obama - I'm The Muhammad Ali of the world on Earth all for my love of duty for all times
jja Manhattan, N.Y.
This is my wife, my god, my goddesses and now my FBI can I get any greater than Richard Nixon? They're going to love me at the FBI because I am the greatest - so America forget Obama - I'm The Muhammad Ali of the world on Earth all for my love of duty for all times
jja Manhattan, N.Y.
1
I had a buddy from the Army that used peyote whenever assigned to guard duty and watched ''cartoons'' all night long. I'm glad to see that people can still get the stuff even up in NYC.
4
If we believe Christie was innocent regarding Bridgegate, then Wray is a good pick for the country. If we don't, then how does this pick make for a great head of the FBI? Maybe Trump wants someone who lets people off the hook once in a while, but is it good for the country?
6
Answering a question with a question: Is anything Trump ever does good for the country, without it first and foremost being good for Trump???
Case closed.
Case closed.
3
but served as Chris Christie's attorney, and whose colleague represents Trump's business interests....???
6
Contrary to what NYT says, I think this is an extremely political appointment. Good grief, he just defended Christie, Trump's drooling lap dog. Wray has no experience in the agency. It's another poor choice.
12
It seems your readers can not be happy with anyone even if the Times called this choice mainstream. One reader faults Wray for being White. Trump was by far the worst of two imperfect candidates: as someone said, we had the choice between a crook and a kook. The Democrats runner up is not even a Democrat, he is a Socialist who bragged about his honeymoon in the Soviet Union. Sick candidates nominated by a sick society. Time for the person on a white horse.
2
The red flag is the Christie recommendation. What close to the vest attitudes can Wray hold that endeared him to Christie?
7
"You promise to shut down the investigation" ...... checked.
6
People are criticizing Christopher Wray as President Trump's choice as the new FBI Director but it was not too long ago they were finding fault that he had not chosen a new director. Mr. Trump cannot win.
Mr. Wray seems like an excellent choice with wonderful credentials. I am sure he will serve the FBI and America in the most honorable of ways.
Mr. Wray seems like an excellent choice with wonderful credentials. I am sure he will serve the FBI and America in the most honorable of ways.
2
Christie and Russians. Sounds good to me. Nothing but a rogue's gallery. Just keep adding to an already over-crowded swamp.
You'd have to question Wray's acceptance of a Trump offer.
Did Trump make him take a loyalty oath and sign a disclosure agreement? That is standard procedure for accepting Trump employment.
You'd have to question Wray's acceptance of a Trump offer.
Did Trump make him take a loyalty oath and sign a disclosure agreement? That is standard procedure for accepting Trump employment.
1
Hard not to be cynical here. Wray seems OK. I just wonder if Trump extracted a "pledge of loyalty" from Wray. We - America, its people, its elected representatives in Congress, the media - will allneed to watch this appointee's actions - his performance - very carefully. Sure, give him the benefit of the doubt - until he betrays said benefit - should he do so. And if he proves in any way 'unfit' to lead the FBI, then very deliberate action must be taken to remove yet another FBI Director. It's not how things are supposed to work..but nothing is these days in Trumplandia.
5
I think it was more like Trump couldn't find anyone but this guy who was willing to take the job. He has a strong non-partisan reputation for honesty which he is not going to compromise for Trump.
Groucho Marx used to say "I wouldn't join a club that would have me as a member." Anybody who wants to work for Trump should be disqualified as crazy. Unless Director Bridgegate is a mole, it makes no sense to take this job so early in your career.
20
NJ Governor Chris Christie, a man who (somehow) managed to gain weight AFTER having surgery which reduced the size of his stomach to the size of a walnut.
We all KNOW Christie had "the last word" for "Bridgegate"; therefore, any man who defended him (albeit quasi-successfully) is most likely someone to be reckoned with.
We all KNOW Christie had "the last word" for "Bridgegate"; therefore, any man who defended him (albeit quasi-successfully) is most likely someone to be reckoned with.
4
Will he pledge loyalty to Trump over the FBI? That's the question.
1
Did Wray have to pledge loyalty to Trump to earn his "impeccable credentials" tag in Trump's tweet?
17
It just means someone used the term "impeccable credentials" when describing Wray to Trump.
5
So since when did "Contempt of Congress" become a potted plant? If the buck doesn't stop at Congress then where does it stop? Look at the "Able Danger" operation into 911, the Pentagon actually told FBI operatives who had the cells in their sites not to testify. What? Where is privilege and justice divergent concepts? You are required to answer Congress or else the option to duck and weave is like a mafia don just toying with The Truth and Honesty. Where's the pressure?
2
I'm not sure what his qualifications are to be FBI Director, except, in Trump's mind, his close ties to Chris Christie. That in itself should be enough to disqualify him.
14
he was with the Justice Department for many years under Bush and Obama. The FBI is not a political organization. Hopefully someone can explain that to President Trump. He doesnt' appear to understand how government works.
10
Since when is the FBI not a political organization?
1
More Russian propaganda. No, neither our FBI nor our judiciary is political, no matter how hard the enemies of our country make that claim. Yes, I'm talking to you, Republicans.
1
Wray may be a decent choice, given Trump's options. The problem is that this is not going to make his problems go away, and will do little to change the dynamics of "Russia-gate." Apart from his core constituency, few Americans from either party believe he stop acting like a businessman and start acting like a President. His tweets are pathetic and demoralizing even those who otherwise support him.
9
Only the editors and writers at the NYTimes could possibly consider anyone who took money from Chris Christie a mainstream pick. It is possible a mainstream lawyer-or perhaps a mainstream ambulance chaser. The differences in ethical standards between lawyers as a group and , say, biologists , cabbies, bus drivers and doctors are probably as wide as the Atlantic Ocean.
However, that this man defended Christie in "Bridgegate" hardly constitutes a recommendation for a person who is a member of the mainstream of ethics in America.
Of course, I seem to recall that the Times considered almost each and every one of what now constitutes the right wing ascension in the US Supreme Court as "members of the mainstream" of legal thinking and as well regarded
by their peers.
However, that this man defended Christie in "Bridgegate" hardly constitutes a recommendation for a person who is a member of the mainstream of ethics in America.
Of course, I seem to recall that the Times considered almost each and every one of what now constitutes the right wing ascension in the US Supreme Court as "members of the mainstream" of legal thinking and as well regarded
by their peers.
13
America needs people like this guy to run our affairs. He is mostly clear headed, intelligent and has a grasp of the native language and how it is spelled and punctuated. ALso, he is obviously too old to be swayed by underage or even of- age girls and , (i have heard), is well enough of that there are few forms of bribery that would tempt him, including home made apple pie which few are able to resist . He is one of the few Baby Boomers left who did not blow their brains out with pot smoke or martinis.
While the same might be said about the "DT"family, Meloop is well known to almost everyone among the right people and did, in fact, do his own work in College and Grad school, long before the internet or WWW.
Clearly a winner there!
While the same might be said about the "DT"family, Meloop is well known to almost everyone among the right people and did, in fact, do his own work in College and Grad school, long before the internet or WWW.
Clearly a winner there!
Trump is hoping that Christie can intervene on his (trump's) behalf.
6
A defense lawyer? How very telling.
11
Should we open a betting pool on how long this man will last? Or should we just assume that Trump will make his life so unpleasant that he will step down anywhere from 3-6 months into his tenure? Or will we learn that Trump asked him to swear fealty to Trump, to love and obey Trump, and that he will run to Trump as soon as there is any hint that Trump will be investigated? In other words, how compromised is Wray now?
8
Is there some rule that requires FBI Directors to be Republican ?
8
From the testimonies and refusal to comment, its obvious republicans don't believe they work for us.
3
Well, at least Trump didn't nominate Jared Kushner to 'straighten out' the FBI. That's some measure of progress for Trump. Mr. Wray seems to have the necessary experience at soothing would be despots. Hope he read the fine print. Particularly the part about sacrificing your integrity at the whim of the Commander-in-chief. Methinks this Trump administration is a revolving door. What's the over/under on this guy?
6
Trump's presidency can be compared to that of Emperor Caligula in ancient Rome. Like Trump, Caligula was an egomaniac, narcissistic, self-obsessed, corrupt, cruel and absolutely incompetent.
Like Trump, Caligula always think he is ALWAYS right and ONLY his opinion matters. Like Trump, Caligula loved only those who sang his praise and was very insecure. Caligula's reign contributed greatly to the ultimate demise of the Roman Empire.
America and ancient Rome has a lot in common. Official Seal, monuments, architecture, capitols, senate, currency, social structure, monetary system, millitary might, pluralistic society, democratic style, judicial system, and lots more.
Trump is following in Caligula's footsteps. I will not be suprised if Trump would emulate Caligula and appoint a horse to the Senate (not funny at all).
Hopefully history will not repeat itself... hopefully.
Like Trump, Caligula always think he is ALWAYS right and ONLY his opinion matters. Like Trump, Caligula loved only those who sang his praise and was very insecure. Caligula's reign contributed greatly to the ultimate demise of the Roman Empire.
America and ancient Rome has a lot in common. Official Seal, monuments, architecture, capitols, senate, currency, social structure, monetary system, millitary might, pluralistic society, democratic style, judicial system, and lots more.
Trump is following in Caligula's footsteps. I will not be suprised if Trump would emulate Caligula and appoint a horse to the Senate (not funny at all).
Hopefully history will not repeat itself... hopefully.
12
Interesting. But I also drew the Trump comparison to Commodus -- (with the major exception that Fred Trump was no Marcus Aurelius).
TRUMP IS LYING and a Fool!
6
I don't see how this nominee is a better choice than Pistole, other than Trump hoping that Wray will play down or shield Trump from investigation. Try again.
5
Pistols, now isn't he a friend of Falstaff in Henry IV? This is getting positively Shakespearean!
1
Yet another white man.... "who recently represented Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey in the so-called Bridgegate scandal..." Maybe he can keep Trump out of prison, too.
8
Anyone Trump picks are obviously tainted with interests or a known affiliate in Trump's inner circle and it make sense since this guy was a lawyer of Chris Christie during Bridgegate. I hope Comey makes a fool out of Trump tomorrow in his public hearing and be truly honest about his interactions with Trump. After handing the election to Trump, Comey probably regretted it now and feel miserable seeing as he lost his job thanks to this clown.
8
Presumably, the FBI will be conducting the investigation of the Russian affair, and Wray will lead the FBI in that investigation. It is awkward, at best, to have the President making this appointment. At some point, Wray may be interviewing Trump about all the contacts between his campaign and the Russians. And Wray may be reading Trump his Miaranda rights. To say the least, Trump' appointment of his likely future investigator is a matter of questionable propriety,
9
I wonder how long HE will last? I hope he waits a while to unpack his bags. Donald Trump: Hair today, Gone tomorrow......
7
Other Trump picks had "safe reputations" too, and as we found out, Trump demands loyalty from everyone and appears to be getting it in view of some of the ridiculous press conferences they've given--except for Comey.
This president's lack of character makes any pick suspicious. Sad. But true.
This president's lack of character makes any pick suspicious. Sad. But true.
10
Christopher A. Wray -- When Everything Goes Awry
11
He needs to be investigated about his possible connection to Russia.
13
Chris Christie is a bully and a thug and this is the lawyer he picked? No thank you.
14
I really thought this one was going to KellyAnne.
Could you imagine?
Could you imagine?
6
He sounds pretty partisan to me, regularly contributing to Republican coffers, representing Christie and working for Bush Jr. How is that not partisan? Depressing.
15
The nomination of Christopher A. Wray to succeed James Comey as the Director of the FBI is a brilliant selection. He is an impressive man with impressive credentials; he is fully prepared to take over the job of investigating crime in our nation. Mr. Wray has demonstrated the integrity needed for the job; he is also a man of strong faith, something we need more of in our government leaders, a quality sorely lacking over the last 8 years. As long as Donald J. Trump, is President of the United States of America, we will get men of strong character, impeccable integrity, and strong faith to lead our government. I support President Trump. Thank you.
2
That kind of logic may work well for you down south in Tennesee, but anything even vaguely associated with Chris Christie in these parts is like Kryptonite.
And just for the record. There is nothing about Donald Trump or his associates that has anything to do with any of the charcteristics you've mentioned -- least of all "impeccable integrity".
Stay tuned for the upcoming investigation.
Thank you.
And just for the record. There is nothing about Donald Trump or his associates that has anything to do with any of the charcteristics you've mentioned -- least of all "impeccable integrity".
Stay tuned for the upcoming investigation.
Thank you.
3
@N.Smith,
I disagree with you.
I disagree with you.
Seriously? Is everyone in this administration obliged to have some connection to Russia? Wray's company bio at his farm reveals (early November 2016.) one of his clients as "an energy company president in a criminal investigation by Russian authorities".
https://web.archive.org/web/20161118122237/http://www.kslaw.com/people/C...
https://web.archive.org/web/20161118122237/http://www.kslaw.com/people/C...
14
Wray's links to Christie/Bridgegate are troubling.
Too close for comfort in my books.
Too close for comfort in my books.
14
If he can work for Christie he can work for Trump. What a surprise.
12
If he has even a scintilla of ethical standards, he's now in big trouble.
14
I wonder if Mr. Pistole privately refused the offer. At the very least, I imagine he expressed reservation or disinterest during the interview. Think about it. Trump could be your boss for almost a decade. I would pass too. The more qualified candidate has the good common sense to stay away from Trump's mess. There's obviously a pattern developing here.
8
Fun facts: King & Spalding, the firm Wray hails from currently, is not only the same firm that supplies POTUS' "ethics" advise, but one of their largest international clients is, wait for it...
Rosneft. Naturally, they have a Russian office.
And of course, they also got Christie out of Bridgegate. Who knows what wonders they can work on Russiagate?
Rosneft. Naturally, they have a Russian office.
And of course, they also got Christie out of Bridgegate. Who knows what wonders they can work on Russiagate?
16
Even beyond Trump, an exceptional leader is required to fill a ten year appointment to lead the FBI. Is this person the best America currently has to offer? Congress must be very thorough during his confirmation hearings. The majority of Americans must have total confidence in him, not just thirty five percent.
91
Interestingly enough, the last FBI director to serve (apart from Mueller who was extended to 12 years) to serve a ~10 year appointment was William H. Webster, from February 23, 1978 – May 25, 1987.
2
This is the Best Trump can do. Nobody who has any brains wants the job. At this point too many better qualified people consider a Trump appointment career suicide.
2
Why does everyone Trump brings into his administration seem to have a connection to Russia?
16
Because you seem to want to believe that. Wray is about as non-Russian connected as you can get. He's been in the Justice Dept & a law firm. How exactly does that make him Russian-connected? Seems like this is confirmation bias here - if you want to believe that everyone in Trump's administration is Russian-connected, you will be tend to believe that.
Check an earlier email by Zack.
2
Wray is tainted by Christie and Trump. I have no confidence in this nomination. Best leave the post vacant until this administration is gone.
18
- Before even reading the article, why isn't Mr. Wray qualified? Let me count the ways:
1. He's white;
2. Trump picked him;
3. He was a Bush appointee;
4. See No. 2
5. See No. 1
6. He's Conservative
7. See. No. 3
1. He's white;
2. Trump picked him;
3. He was a Bush appointee;
4. See No. 2
5. See No. 1
6. He's Conservative
7. See. No. 3
11
Trump seems to have stayed up nights trying to find someone with an excellent reputation within the DOJ ... the better to help make Comey look like damaged goods as this week's hearings unfold.
The Republican House doesn't care who gets the job, as long as the 2018 midterms don't continue their crazy crescendo into a referendum on impeachment. I sense the fine hand of Jared Kushner, rebuilding every bridge in sight ... including the George Washington.
The Republican House doesn't care who gets the job, as long as the 2018 midterms don't continue their crazy crescendo into a referendum on impeachment. I sense the fine hand of Jared Kushner, rebuilding every bridge in sight ... including the George Washington.
10
Any choices by Trump for any position in any capacity should be blocked or frozen until all of these multiple investigations that are going on are over.
17
At the Oval Office:
Trump: OK, who's next?
Kushner: Uhh...Hold on...[Shuffles through a stack of papers]...Wray
Trump: Huh?
Kushner: Christopher Wray. [Hands Trump the Wray file.]
Trump: What's this?
Kushner: His file. [Trump hands it back to Kushner.]
Trump: Read it.
Kushner: Criminal defense attorney...
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Defended Christi's bridge problem...
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Republican, makes donations.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Yale, Yale.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Seems like nobody's heard of him.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: 9/11.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Hold on...[Peels a post-it note from the back of the file, reads the ancient oath of fealty.] Ummm...Says here: "I promise on my faith that I will in the future be faithful to the lord, never cause him harm and will observe my homage to him completely against all persons in good faith and without deceit."
Trump: Check--Check.
Trump: OK, who's next?
Kushner: Uhh...Hold on...[Shuffles through a stack of papers]...Wray
Trump: Huh?
Kushner: Christopher Wray. [Hands Trump the Wray file.]
Trump: What's this?
Kushner: His file. [Trump hands it back to Kushner.]
Trump: Read it.
Kushner: Criminal defense attorney...
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Defended Christi's bridge problem...
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Republican, makes donations.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Yale, Yale.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Seems like nobody's heard of him.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: 9/11.
Trump: Check.
Kushner: Hold on...[Peels a post-it note from the back of the file, reads the ancient oath of fealty.] Ummm...Says here: "I promise on my faith that I will in the future be faithful to the lord, never cause him harm and will observe my homage to him completely against all persons in good faith and without deceit."
Trump: Check--Check.
34
You can lead a Trump to knowledge, but you cannot make him smart..............
4
Just wait. It will only be a matter of time before anything considered valuable or ethical babout Mr. Wray will be corrupted to the point of making him unrecognizable from his former self.
19
My first thought (honest to gosh) was great, an attorney that defended that slime, Chris Christie.
He is a partner at a law firm that represents the Russian state oil company Rosneft. Is there anyone in the trump administration not compromised by Russian conflicts of interest?
152
This is the Assistant AG who did not arrest the Bush Admin, Especially Cheney, for their repeated war crimes including torture, theft thru Halliburton and the whole set of treasons leading us into Iraq, who had nothing at all to do with 911. He also assisted Christie and he is expected to be fair and honorable about running the FBI? Somehow I do not think so.
69
Sounds worrisome.
7
I am so appalled at current administration's open obstruction to justice: firing of Comey, criminal charges against young whistle-blower, appointing a known defender of Republican hubris and a person of questionable ties to Russians as the new FBI chief, the list just goes on! Exactly when will it be enough to act on this blatant screwing of American values and justice system?
6
Sounds like a Trump clone. The owners and handlers of Trump and cohorts must be smiling........I wonder why our so-called Congress is so silent and compliant??????
3
I'm sure there is someone at the FBI headquarters filing papers right now, who is more qualified to run the Bureau than this lawyer from Atlanta. That said, you can be sure if Trump has nominated him, he knows enough to play good old boy. Notice how many Trump nominees and appointments are from the south?
22
As part of the vetting process, did he prostrate himself and lick the bottom of a sole, while professing undying lfeality?
25
Ask him about that confounded bridge.
38
I can't find the bridge. Where's the bridge?
1
The George Washington Bridge is here, between New York and New Jersey -- and you can get the entire scoop involving it and Chris Christie online.
For all of you ex-DOJ inside baseball types, at least it's not Alice Fisher. Whew!
Everyone within Trump's administration appears to be a crook. I'm guessing this guy is no different. Sorry.....absolutely no faith in anyone willing to be part of the Trump administration. Also, his having donated relatively large sums of money exclusively to GOP candidates doesn't make him non-partisan.
45
He did say he'd work on the bridges.
And here I was expecting Trump to make the surprise announcement of Steven Seagal as his pick!
15
Congrats Christopher Wray! Somehow you have convinced yourself that you can make this work, despite all those other veteran politicians who viewed this "opportunity" as radioactive.
Your career will now most likely end quite badly, your reputation irreparably damaged, most likely dragged through the mud via presidential tweets.
Your career will now most likely end quite badly, your reputation irreparably damaged, most likely dragged through the mud via presidential tweets.
38
Anyone from Yale is suspect for any government work. Right?
Why should your record speak for you?
Why should your record speak for you?
2
Sorry to be skeptical. He may be a good choice, but I am worried about Christopher Wray’s relationship with Christie, who is also connected with Trump. Could this provide an avenue for funneling information about the Mueller investigation to the White House? Is there a firewall? Also, the next FBI director must make prevention of further encroachments on our voting system a serious priority, regardless of the Trump-Russia investigation. Does anyone know if he is the person who will do that?
104
This is a cruel joke.
16
No defense lawyer has ever been named head of the FBI. It doesn't matter that he was head of the criminal division. He left to make millions keeping criminals out of jail. Trump nominated him because he thinks he'll be loyal and make sure there are no more investigations of Trump. I know, everyone is entitled to a defense. But their defenders shouldn't be top cops.
124
Christopher Wray, your first assignment is to investigate Comey!
Signed, Donald
Signed, Donald
19
Distraction. Like we're all dogs chasing sticks.
12
I say nominee Wray should stay a nominee until we figure out what the sam hill is going on
27
As to Wray, the criminal Defense attorney that defended Chris Christie, just another Trump lackey to soothe POTUS.
15
Well, you can't say the man is a coward. Or incompetent.
If he accepts the position, let's hope he realizes he's working for the people of America, not the Trump organization, and uses his talents wisely.
If he accepts the position, let's hope he realizes he's working for the people of America, not the Trump organization, and uses his talents wisely.
9
Interesting that, "for a job that has historically been kept outside of politics," Mr. Wray was selected, over a former FBI deputy director, in part because "his political skills were honed in the crucible of scandal [which] gave him an edge." Although "he managed to soothe and counsel the volatile Mr. Christie," does Trump understand that Mr. Wray wasn't part of New Jersey's Justice Dept. while defending Christie? Or did he just see "criminal defense attorney" on Mr. Wray's resume and stop reading there (assuming he even read the resume)?
And soothing Christie may have been a tough job, but the tinge of paranoia to Trump's volatility makes Christie look as unflappable as Mike Pence. Mr. Wray, if confirmed, will have his work cut out for him. It's a shame that soothing, or expertise as a criminal defense attorney, even needs to be a consideration for the FBI Director's position in Trump's administration. Sounds as if Ivanka and Jared weighed in heavily on this decision.
And soothing Christie may have been a tough job, but the tinge of paranoia to Trump's volatility makes Christie look as unflappable as Mike Pence. Mr. Wray, if confirmed, will have his work cut out for him. It's a shame that soothing, or expertise as a criminal defense attorney, even needs to be a consideration for the FBI Director's position in Trump's administration. Sounds as if Ivanka and Jared weighed in heavily on this decision.
12
Trump was going to politicize this job no matter what, and he has done so. Wray’s ties to Christie and Republican causes in general do not make for an impartial, straight-shooting FBI director. But as has been pointed out, Trump didn’t fire the entire FBI when he got rid of Comey, so if Wray seems to be dragging his feet on the Trump-Russia investigation, or refuses to follow certain obvious leads, we the public, despite Trump’s witch hunts to find and prosecute leakers, will learn about it.
41
If this guy (Wray) is an upstanding citizen he will be neutral in whatever happens to the investigations, making sure they are on track and above board. Christie is not in jail because of Wray representing him. Are all attorneys just interested in making money regardless of their clients guilt or innocence? Think about O.J. Simpsons attorneys that got him off only to later see him stealing and ending up in jail.
6
So just to be clear, Trump's pick for chief PROSECUTION investigator, whose first primary job will be to continue the investigation of the chief executive he works for, is that he DEFENDED the previous chief executive he worked for.
Where precisely are his impeccable qualifications for THIS job?
Where precisely are his impeccable qualifications for THIS job?
43
What does exactly "safe" and "mainstream" mean in a Trump administration context?
11
It means that Trump feels safe with this guy leading the investigation against him
12
Anybody willing to step into the job after the Comey revelations about Trump's demands for loyalty is immediately suspect.
11
Shouldn't fbi be someone with a law enforcement background?
12
Or, Heaven forfend, someone who actually knows how the FBI works?
3
No.
Any Federal prosecuter in the Criminal Division of the Justice Dept.and has served in that capacity for an extended period of time has an intimate relationship with the FBI. Mr. Wray qualifies.
Any Federal prosecuter in the Criminal Division of the Justice Dept.and has served in that capacity for an extended period of time has an intimate relationship with the FBI. Mr. Wray qualifies.
1
Really, Mr. Flom? Hiring a defense attorney to be the head of the FBI? The FBI,, in case you were unaware, is an investigative department. They investigate crimes, treason, etc. with the aim of prosecution not defense.
2
How can anyone accept this post, knowing that either he will be asked to pledge his loyalty to Trump, or the public will assume he's been asked to pledge his loyalty?
11
Surely the man is suspect simply because Trump picked him, an item observed by several other comment contributors. But more importantly, at this point in time I very seriously question the competence, managerial skill, and simple common sense of anyone who would consider any job working for Donald Trump. Another editorial today in NYT anticipates additional departures from the Trump Administration due to frustration with jobs and the boss. How can the situation possibly be missed by a man of "impeccable credentials."
6
Christopher Wray has made over $46,000 in political contributions to FAR right candidates since 2008. This is a nominee more committed to ideology than law.
https://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/christopher-wray.a...
https://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/christopher-wray.a...
15
Well, at least he's an Eli through and through. Boola-boola and up the elites!
1
Independence will be a huge issue with this appointee but he is camera ready and we know DJT goes for men who "look the role" .
9
Well, if he's Chris Christie's lawyer, he must have a keen sense of morality (said no one, ever).
13
I have no objective understanding of Trump left.Anyone he appoints I don't trust!
9
I view this choice with a little suspicion, possibly unfounded. Why pick a lawyer from King & Spalding, a law firm employed by Russian gas and oil companies, including the state-owned Rosneft?
187
I think you seem to be looking a little too hard here - King & Spalding are massive, the firm "represents more than 250 public companies, including half of the Fortune Global 100."
And Wray worked in their Atlanta and Washington, D.C. offices.
The same could be said of "why pick a lawyer from a firm that is employed by Monsanto, or Google, or Hoffman La-Roche, or Merck, etc.
They're also an international law firm, and Wray was not part of those fields.
I think this is a non-sequitur, if you want to criticize Wray I'd think his connections to Christie are possibly more valid.
And Wray worked in their Atlanta and Washington, D.C. offices.
The same could be said of "why pick a lawyer from a firm that is employed by Monsanto, or Google, or Hoffman La-Roche, or Merck, etc.
They're also an international law firm, and Wray was not part of those fields.
I think this is a non-sequitur, if you want to criticize Wray I'd think his connections to Christie are possibly more valid.
1
Any suspicions are totally justified. In fact, King & Spalding's relationship with Russian gas & oil companies raises a huge red flag - especially in light of the current investigations into Trump's Russian ties.
5
I did not know that. Yet another Russian connection. Thanks for the info. It does make his choice even clearer.
4
Wow, I'm surprised Kushner approved of this, given his father's connection to the whole Christie mess.
5
This is a bad choice for the FBI. Anyone who defended Christie from Bridge-gate should NOT be in charge of the FBI...
5
Good men must be hard to find these days.
4
Anybody that serves under Trump in any capacity, even if they are Lincolnesque will soon realize it was a mistake and it will forever be a blot on their careers.
47
Sorry, I don't consider someone who is buddies with Christie and helped him with Bridgegate to be someone of "impeccable credentials" or someone who will be independent. But I can see why Trump would want him.
The article says this is a "safe, mainstream choice". Sad.
The article says this is a "safe, mainstream choice". Sad.
123
Excellent point. And fortunately for us, we're located on the other side of the Bridge.
5
Another one walks the plank.
27
Wray should flash some ethics and reject the appointment, asking that Comey be re-appointed until the Russia investigation is over.
On another note, apparently all the law firms in Washington DC represent Trumps or Kushners. Obviously a Trump strategy to spread enough legal work around to keep the swamp happy and keep the conflicts of interests nearby.
Talk about Swamp! Anyone being tapped for anything, including the Special Prosecutor himself, and the head of the FBI, comes from a law firm who represents Trump's interests. This is a good lesson for Americans who are paying attention. These types of conflicts wouldn't have been allowed decades ago, now they're a daily occurrence.
Gibbons should write a book.
On another note, apparently all the law firms in Washington DC represent Trumps or Kushners. Obviously a Trump strategy to spread enough legal work around to keep the swamp happy and keep the conflicts of interests nearby.
Talk about Swamp! Anyone being tapped for anything, including the Special Prosecutor himself, and the head of the FBI, comes from a law firm who represents Trump's interests. This is a good lesson for Americans who are paying attention. These types of conflicts wouldn't have been allowed decades ago, now they're a daily occurrence.
Gibbons should write a book.
52
Well said and very timely. Thanks for the behind the scenes insight.
"[N]ot known as a partisan"?? The man defended Gov Christie over a political act of aggression that ended up killing at least one person. We're supposed to believe a Bush 43 attorney and Christie's TrafficGate defender is not going to politicize the FBI? What drivel.
106
To be fair, the family of the elderly woman who was being transported in that ambulance did not view her death as having been caused or hastened by the bridge problem. That having been said, I am no fan of Chris Christie. His behavior in office was consistently disgusting.
3
He's still in office. And will be for a bit longer. Then we can ignore him again.
Tiffany Trump is a pre-law who has taken the LSAT. Why didn't she get this job?
51
I'm sure her father probably suggested it, but thankfully, cooler heads prevailed. Pre-law is not enough knowledge or experience to fill a position that has been filled by attorney generals for the last several terms.
Because she'll probably end up being on Trump's Defense Team.
3
lol nice one
2
All we needed to know about this "safe choice" is that he defended Chris Crispie Creme Christie in the aftermath of the Bridgegate scandal, in which Christie was fully complicit. That's sufficient for all of us to determine that this fellow is a right wing partisan whose fealty is to the GOTP and not the nation writ large. The reign of the GOTP criminal and treasonous enterprise continues apace. There will, undoubtedly, be many more shoes yet to drop in this widening scandal, and Wray's appointment cannot stop it. 6/7, 10:56 AM
24
Mr. Trump is a politician who is utterly unique in history in his ability to drive his opponents totally nuts! You all should try to calm down a bit just for the sake of your own sanity.
1
He bears an unfortunate resemblance to Ramsay Bolton in Game of Thrones.
15
If we are to demonize lawyers b/c of their clients, (I have done so myself< Dershowitz for example), we interfere with our guarantee of legal representation.
Mr Christie was never convicted nor indicted, except in the court of public opinion, just as Mr Trump is thus far
and in THAT court I have my own list of felons and to use Hillary's word super-predators
Mr Christie was never convicted nor indicted, except in the court of public opinion, just as Mr Trump is thus far
and in THAT court I have my own list of felons and to use Hillary's word super-predators
3
Perfect timing! A new director to take over just when things are heating up. No doubt Wray will want to do a thorough "review" of Rosenstein's work as a way to slow him down. He is nothing but a political flunky. Frankly, no lawyer worth his salt would work for Trump in the current context, so I have to assume he is being brought in to protect Trump. With his ties to the Trump Organization through his law firm and through his political benefactor Christie, he would begin the job with his hands tied.
Our pathetic president. This announcement is a yawn and he doesn't realize this.He actually believes announcing a new FBI Director one day before the testimony of the one he fired, is going to divert our attention. As he works the knobs behind the curtain: "Don't Pay Attention To The Man Behind The Testimony."
22
At this point Dem's cynicism about ANY 45 appointee will lead inexorably to the comments below. Wray is not an impeccable candidate. His concealing Christie's cell while Defense attorneys wanted it to try to implicate Christie in the Bridgegate scandal is very suspect. Yet he was Christie's defense attorney. All the judiciary committee can do is to be very very thorough in questioning him, particularly with regard to the ongoing Mueller investigation. We should also know how his career as a defender of white collar suspects makes him a likely person to investigate them in the role of FBI chief. The question of loyalty oaths to anyone but the American People should be examined. Ultimately he will be appointed. It is not a safe choice for 45, but it is "safeish".
51
I would say he's certainly not impeccable, but also not totally unqualified. He does really appear safeish, the media of course will continue attacking Trump (but what else is new there) - I think he's a pretty decent pick for FBI director.
I wonder what Javanka had to say about this choice.
Another one of "trumps chumps" that distinguished group of thinkers and toadies
So he represented Gov. Chris Christie in the Bridgegate affair. Was he one of the lawyers who got paid with public funds for defending Christie? It's hard to know, because there were so many Republican "Justice Workers" involved.
I suspect that in the history books, the Trump Era will be seen, not so much as an administration, but as a crime wave - certainly, as an environmental crime wave.
I'm sure that Christopher Wray will do his part to support the Trump Brand of Justice.
I suspect that in the history books, the Trump Era will be seen, not so much as an administration, but as a crime wave - certainly, as an environmental crime wave.
I'm sure that Christopher Wray will do his part to support the Trump Brand of Justice.
35
Regarding your second paragraph – – that's if we are lucky.
"That his political skills were honed in the crucible of scandal gave him an edge over the other finalist, John S. Pistole, the former deputy director of the F.B.I."
Translation: He knows how to obfuscate the truth to make a Criminal (Christie) look like a Saint. Donald Trump: "I hope you can do the same for me- bud."
Translation: He knows how to obfuscate the truth to make a Criminal (Christie) look like a Saint. Donald Trump: "I hope you can do the same for me- bud."
51
Any relation to Fay Wray, the film actress "scream queen" who played opposite King Kong as Ann Darrow, who clung dramatically to the top of New York's most iconic building as the monster ravaged ever more dangerously?
6
This is a bad choice for the country. Trump now has a back channel communication option with the FBI director through Chris Christie. On the surface, it may seem like a safe mainstream pick but it is far from it. The choice of Christie's friend and defense counsel in the Bridge-gate scandal shows that Trump will push the envelope to solidify his inner circle and continue to damage the presidency. Folks, the system is rigged, in Trump's world and the further we let the president get away with this, the more damage he will do to our democracy. James Clapper is right, Watergate pales in comparison to the Russia probe.
57
Perhaps as a white collar crime defender he knows where all the skeletons are buried. Could be a plus for him.
4
On the surface, this seems like a safe pick. But I am not sure that this candidate is the right choice in today's political climate.
The FBI director must be non-political and impartial. That he played a big role in soothing the "volatile" Christie when he defended him seems to indicate that possibly Mr. trump feels he might do the same for him?
The last thing we need at the FBI is anyone who would be "loyal" to a sitting president during a potentially acrimonious and serious criminal investigation into the presidential team's possible collusion with Russia.
The FBI director must be non-political and impartial. That he played a big role in soothing the "volatile" Christie when he defended him seems to indicate that possibly Mr. trump feels he might do the same for him?
The last thing we need at the FBI is anyone who would be "loyal" to a sitting president during a potentially acrimonious and serious criminal investigation into the presidential team's possible collusion with Russia.
21
He may have impeccable credentials as a white collar defense lawyer but he's almost completely unqualified to run the FBI. What organization has he ever been in charge of? The white collar practice at an Atlanta law firm is a joke from an administrative perspective. He worked at Main Justice for TWO YEARS 15 years ago. That may pass for a lot of experience with these clowns but the rank & file at the FBI are going to be appalled at the contempt they are being shown by this nomination.
353
Will Wray show his loyalty to the President or to country or get fired? Only time will tell.
I am sure there were many candidates within the FBI which the President could have selected, Andrew McCabe being one of them. Instead he hires someone from the outside with close ties to Governor Christi who is part of the President’s inner circle. In addition, Wray was Governor Christi’s defense attorney in the traffic jam scandal and are considered good friends. This in itself may be a conflict of interest for the director’s job because of Wray’s relationship with Governor Christi and Governor Christi’s close ties with President Trump.
It would not surprise me if allegations surface about President Trump demanding loyalty from Wray shortly after Wray getting the job and obtaining that loyalty.
I am sure there were many candidates within the FBI which the President could have selected, Andrew McCabe being one of them. Instead he hires someone from the outside with close ties to Governor Christi who is part of the President’s inner circle. In addition, Wray was Governor Christi’s defense attorney in the traffic jam scandal and are considered good friends. This in itself may be a conflict of interest for the director’s job because of Wray’s relationship with Governor Christi and Governor Christi’s close ties with President Trump.
It would not surprise me if allegations surface about President Trump demanding loyalty from Wray shortly after Wray getting the job and obtaining that loyalty.
16
Did Wray suppress evidence in the Bridgegate case by holding onto Christie's cell phone? Is that "impeccable integrity"?
http://www.wnyc.org/story/christies-destroyed-and-missing-evidence-nixon...
http://www.wnyc.org/story/christies-destroyed-and-missing-evidence-nixon...
26
No, that is loyalty!
5
I wonder whether he pledged his loyalty.
The article says Wray "managed to soothe and counel the volatile Mr. Christie." That would be a good recommendation for Wray to become Trump's lawyer . . . but Wray's association with Christie raises troubling questions.
The article suggests Wray's nomination eased concerns among FBI staff that Trump would try to politicize the Bureau. Hasn't Trump already tried to do that? And - while attorney's usually are not responsible for their client's misdeeds - how does anyone who represented Christie in a case that was all about politicizing non-political state services (the GW Bridge and Port Authority!) suddenly become a prospective civil service hero?
Here are my ideas: 1) Trump can appoint a career FBI agent with a spotless record to be Director, or 2) Congress should refuse to allow Trump to appoint a new Director, making the Asst Director the Acting Director for the duration of Trump's term in office - because Trump has shown he cannot be trusted in the administration of justice, just like Trump and Kushner have shown they cannot be trusted with security clearances.
Time for Congress to stand up - Republicans and Democrats alike.
The article suggests Wray's nomination eased concerns among FBI staff that Trump would try to politicize the Bureau. Hasn't Trump already tried to do that? And - while attorney's usually are not responsible for their client's misdeeds - how does anyone who represented Christie in a case that was all about politicizing non-political state services (the GW Bridge and Port Authority!) suddenly become a prospective civil service hero?
Here are my ideas: 1) Trump can appoint a career FBI agent with a spotless record to be Director, or 2) Congress should refuse to allow Trump to appoint a new Director, making the Asst Director the Acting Director for the duration of Trump's term in office - because Trump has shown he cannot be trusted in the administration of justice, just like Trump and Kushner have shown they cannot be trusted with security clearances.
Time for Congress to stand up - Republicans and Democrats alike.
27
Although Trump may have wanted to both distract from and unnerve Comey, it isn't going to work. Comey is unflappable, unlike Trump, who can't control his emotions.
Comey will give his testimony on Thursday and that will be the No. 1 story all over the world. I do look forward to the outrageous tweets that take us closer to a secure democracy.
Comey will give his testimony on Thursday and that will be the No. 1 story all over the world. I do look forward to the outrageous tweets that take us closer to a secure democracy.
6
That a criminal defense attorney has defended accused criminals should not be held against him unless there are accusations that he behaved unethically. The more important questions concern the nominee's behavior in Bush's DOJ, including anything Wray may have written or said regarding torture and/or civil rights and privacy.
The Senate (and our free press) need to investigate Wray's reputation and work during his previous government service. That will speak volumes as to his fitness.
The Senate (and our free press) need to investigate Wray's reputation and work during his previous government service. That will speak volumes as to his fitness.
7
A nomination from Trump is a sure sign Wray's not fit for the office.
14
"As head of the criminal division from 2003 to 2005, he directed efforts to deal with fraud scandals plaguing the corporate world."
Did Wray bring strong cases or make sure that violators were brought to justice or escaped with a slap on the hand? No examples were in the article,
Wray contributing to only Republican candidates doesn't make this guy non-partisan.
After all that has happened we need a FBI director that's strictly Law Enforcement oriented with no political affiliation.
I suspect what took such a long time was finding someone that could be "Loyal" to Trump but doesn't appear as such.
Did Wray bring strong cases or make sure that violators were brought to justice or escaped with a slap on the hand? No examples were in the article,
Wray contributing to only Republican candidates doesn't make this guy non-partisan.
After all that has happened we need a FBI director that's strictly Law Enforcement oriented with no political affiliation.
I suspect what took such a long time was finding someone that could be "Loyal" to Trump but doesn't appear as such.
8
Do not rush to judgment against Mr. Wray.
Those concerned about Mr. Wray's representation of Chris Christie--who, but for a lazy, incompetent US Attorney in NJ failing to subpoena his phone records would have been indicted--should remember that the crimes of the client are not the crimes of their counsel. Highly regarded criminal defense lawyers routinely represent the worst political and corporate criminals, because there are not enough wrongly accused clients to sustain a practice.
Unless Mr. Wray is far more corrupt than the evidence to date shows, he would not leave a lucrative law practice to be Trump's puppet and destroy his reputation.
Those concerned about Mr. Wray's representation of Chris Christie--who, but for a lazy, incompetent US Attorney in NJ failing to subpoena his phone records would have been indicted--should remember that the crimes of the client are not the crimes of their counsel. Highly regarded criminal defense lawyers routinely represent the worst political and corporate criminals, because there are not enough wrongly accused clients to sustain a practice.
Unless Mr. Wray is far more corrupt than the evidence to date shows, he would not leave a lucrative law practice to be Trump's puppet and destroy his reputation.
4
Wray, a Republican donor. Comey, a Republican. This again demonstrates the reason President Obama was often politically naive despite obvious political realities. Hillary would be president today if Obama had appointed a competent Independent or Democrat as FBI director instead of Republican James Comey. A Republican's loyalty is first to party before country, as demonstrated in Comey's last minute torpedo of Hillary.
7
Wrig. Hillary would be president today if the Electoral College had been abolished.
2
At this point in the history of our country, the Republican Party and Republican politicians have become such right wing extremists and so corrupt that anyone who identifies with and supports them is suspect.
10
It's not possible for Trump to make an apolitical pick for the FBI. I wonder what promises Wray made. Did he pledge "loyalty?" Perhaps his loyalty to Christie was enough assurance. Naturally, as a gifted lawyer, Wray will have smooth answers to all suspicions during his confirmation, but Dem Senators need to put him on notice: his every word and every action will be under a microscope.
66
What, pray, is "a gifted lawyer"?
"Christopher Wray ... is considered a safe, mainstream pick. Mr. Wray represented Gov. Chris Christie in the so-called Bridgegate scandal"?
A "safe, mainstream pick" in what way? And to WHOM?
This guy smells like a Christie pal. And ANYONE connected to Christie and Bridgegate is highly suspect, at this point, and NOT "mainstream"!
Christie's role in the Port Authority, various scandals connected with that agency -- of which Bridgegate was but one! -- and various back-room deals with Trump (e.g huge tax 'settlement' windfall for Trump's Atlantic City casinos) are all huge red flags! Worse, really--apparent signs of corruption!
Real non-partisan, PROFESSIONAL law-enforcement professionals are needed to restore the public's faith in our justice and law-enforcement sectors and to restore the rule of law itself! NOT partisan hacks, with questionable ties to corrupt and discredited characters like Christie!
A "safe, mainstream pick" in what way? And to WHOM?
This guy smells like a Christie pal. And ANYONE connected to Christie and Bridgegate is highly suspect, at this point, and NOT "mainstream"!
Christie's role in the Port Authority, various scandals connected with that agency -- of which Bridgegate was but one! -- and various back-room deals with Trump (e.g huge tax 'settlement' windfall for Trump's Atlantic City casinos) are all huge red flags! Worse, really--apparent signs of corruption!
Real non-partisan, PROFESSIONAL law-enforcement professionals are needed to restore the public's faith in our justice and law-enforcement sectors and to restore the rule of law itself! NOT partisan hacks, with questionable ties to corrupt and discredited characters like Christie!
8
We can only hope that Wray makes the transition from criminal defense attorney, were you allegiance belongs to your client, to head of the FBI where your allegiance belongs to The Truth. I hope that having been prosecutor in the Justice Department, he recognizes the difference.
Governor Soprano's Consigliere Counselor is now ready to criminally defend and cover up for the new Godfather and Mafia Don.
208
@Socrates
Don't you agree that Corzine's lawyer, Andrew J. Levander, might have been a better fit to defend the "new godfather"?
Don't you agree that Corzine's lawyer, Andrew J. Levander, might have been a better fit to defend the "new godfather"?
How telling and unfortunately predicable that this selected appointment was made with 144 character limit. Something which should be thoroughly explained and lauded is presented, along with all the other questionable public announcements, from the leader of this nation (and at one time considered to be the leader of the free world), with so little care for the historical significance of the moment, paraphrasing...sad.
36
Wray is a lawyer at the firm King and Spaulding and one of their clients is...wait for it...trump organization.
320
Clear conflict of interest!
2
Mr. Wray purely accepting this nomination from Trump will give him the appearance of impropriety, since we all know and have seen, Trump likes HIS employees to be completely loyal to him.
And someone who is a registered Republican, donates only to Republicans, pals around with Chris Christie most assuredly appears to make him partisan. But, that is my opinion.
I hope for Mr. Wray's sake, he knows what he could be doing to his career attaching his wagon to this toxic administration. Any hint of an obstruction in this Russian scandal, I believe will destroy him. He will be under intense scrutiny.
And someone who is a registered Republican, donates only to Republicans, pals around with Chris Christie most assuredly appears to make him partisan. But, that is my opinion.
I hope for Mr. Wray's sake, he knows what he could be doing to his career attaching his wagon to this toxic administration. Any hint of an obstruction in this Russian scandal, I believe will destroy him. He will be under intense scrutiny.
100
Erratum @Dorota:
I do not know, but, to this reader, representing Christie in the Bridgegate scandal is a big minus for a nominee. It certainly testifies to his lawyering skills, but leaves questions regarding Wray's civic posture. He may be a highly respected lawyer, but, at times like this, more is needed of the FBI Director than superb professional skills.
I do not know, but, to this reader, representing Christie in the Bridgegate scandal is a big minus for a nominee. It certainly testifies to his lawyering skills, but leaves questions regarding Wray's civic posture. He may be a highly respected lawyer, but, at times like this, more is needed of the FBI Director than superb professional skills.
31
A decent pick. But, have not doubt that the timing of the announcement is a(nother) attempt to control the news narrative. He is running out of flash grenades and is grasping for smoke bombs. Look for a rushed infrastructure plan on Thurs/Fri. He hates to go into the weekend without control of the narrative.
16
You mean onto the course.
3
At this point, Trump could pick Ronald McDonald, yet nothing will prevent his house of cards from coming tumbling down. No matter what they do or don't find with the investigation into Russian links, all indications are that Trump tried to shut down the inquiry into it -- an obstruction of justice that virtually nothing can keep from coming to light, I'd bet.
23
Mr. Wray, our mother's were wise when they told us we are too often judged by the company we keep. You may well be a good man, but you're about to swim in murky waters, where your fellow swimmers may well attempt to pull you down with them to the bottom of the sea. Now ask the question: would your mother fear for you, or be proud of the company you're about to keep?
53
I can’t get past Mr. Wray's support and defense of Mr. Christie.
And I can’t trust anyone involved with, or who would involve themselves with, the Trump administration.
You can bet Mr. Trump has made sure that Mr. Wray's criminal prosecution side is not likely to trump his criminal defense side.
I imagine Mr. Wray will not look aggressively in to Mr. Trump's misdeeds.
Michael Bain
Glorieta, New Mexico
And I can’t trust anyone involved with, or who would involve themselves with, the Trump administration.
You can bet Mr. Trump has made sure that Mr. Wray's criminal prosecution side is not likely to trump his criminal defense side.
I imagine Mr. Wray will not look aggressively in to Mr. Trump's misdeeds.
Michael Bain
Glorieta, New Mexico
279
The links to Trump are always glaring. Christie was of course complicit in Bridgegate and Trump was close to him and therefore Mr. Wray is connected to this administration. There is no way to separate partisanship in Trump's agenda.
In a more stable presidency this would not present the same problem, but of course, in a less tainted presidency the FBI director would not have been fired.
In a more stable presidency this would not present the same problem, but of course, in a less tainted presidency the FBI director would not have been fired.
9
Every person in this country is entitled to representation. The lawyer is duty bound to do his/her best job for the client. The Christie case was a high profile case that any firm would want, and the lawyer tasked with that case should not be tarnished. On the other hand, we can see Mr. Christie's fine hand in this appointment, and that, I would question.
87
If as pointed out Christie's "fine hand" is apparent here, duty bound best for client becomes an interesting perspective for Mr Wray.
1
as long as he has pledged loyalty and absolute fealty to the man in charge, what could possibly be wrong with this impeccable pick
114
Let us hopethat trump does not ask for personal loyalty.
Perhaps he should be asked that in confirmation hearings...
Perhaps he should be asked that in confirmation hearings...
19
On the face of it, a good, safe Republican choice. Questions to ask during confirmation hearings, no matter the nominee, no matter the position:
During interviewing, did anyone ask you to swear loyalty to the President? If so, who asked and what was your answer?
For FBI in particular during interviewing, did anyone ask you to stop investigations of any kind? If so, who asked and what was your answer?
During interviewing, did anyone ask you to swear loyalty to the President? If so, who asked and what was your answer?
For FBI in particular during interviewing, did anyone ask you to stop investigations of any kind? If so, who asked and what was your answer?
76
That would require more courage than any Republican has, and they will lob him soft balls thru the hearings and we will have another trump loyalist. Like other appointments (Sessions) he certainly will have a case of convenient memory loss, and the joke will be on America.
1
Thankfully, Democratic Senators can also ask questions. The Republicans cannot lock them out of that part of the confirmation.
One has to ask whether Trump got the "loyalty pledge" from Mr. Wray.
21
Congress should not allow our suspect president process another national security appointment until the Russian ties that he and the many men and women in his White House have are fully investigated and prosecuted.
117
The Republican Party clearly does not adhere to your view.
1
Mr. Reyes makes an excellent point. All of Trump's actions should be put on hold until he is either cleared or impeached.
5
Any association with Gov. Christie is troubling especially when on defense.
Christie was/is one mean ......who skirts the law and got away with it. Christie lives in the world of 'shady' back stabbing and strong-arm so any friend of his is not something most people would want on their resume.
Christie was/is one mean ......who skirts the law and got away with it. Christie lives in the world of 'shady' back stabbing and strong-arm so any friend of his is not something most people would want on their resume.
40
Your lawyer is not your friend. Your lawyer is your legal representative. Something you are entitled to under our system of rule of law.
6
Well, he was a criminal defense attorney: who do you think he is supposed to be defending? It is a job, and once accepted, must be done to the best of your ability.
1
Yes, but the article says he and Mr Christie bonded when they were both young attorneys in the Justice Department. That sounds like a long standing friendship to me, since Wray got his law degree in 1992.
1
This man should not be nominating a national ice cream flavor let alone an F.B.I. director...
Now we've got an even more suspect connection to Russia as his latest slight at Quatar coincides perfectly with the IC finding that Russian hackers planted fake stories in order to cause issues between Quatar and the Gulf States, interesting that Trump chose to side with the Saudis...
Now we've got an even more suspect connection to Russia as his latest slight at Quatar coincides perfectly with the IC finding that Russian hackers planted fake stories in order to cause issues between Quatar and the Gulf States, interesting that Trump chose to side with the Saudis...
I wonder if Wray will still want the job after Comey's testimony tomorrow...
23
Well now David, that depends on whether or not Mr. Wray is 'loyal' to Trump. The Donald is very careful about his 'picks' (choices) - he can smell a loyal before he enters the room. We can only hope that after Comey's testimony he will resign.
You have to be confirmed before you can resign. He could withdraw himself from consideration for the position.
It's difficult to imagine the mental acrobats one must do to continue to support our president. Christopher Wray is someone who will bend the truth however is Necessary to win a case. Gee, I wonder where this is leading.
21
The job of the FBI director is not to "support the president."
Presumably Christopher Wray will resister inappropriate manipulation and will resign if appropriate.
Presumably Christopher Wray will resister inappropriate manipulation and will resign if appropriate.
Of course...pick another lawyer who was representing another government official wrapped in scandal to be in charge of investigating government scandals. This administration makes me sick to my stomach. Each time I think it can't get worse, it does. Drain the swamp apparently only meant that the bottom feeders would then be able to see the light of day. I hope all those who voted for Trump are happy, and will rejoice as they see THEIR lives destroyed by this man.
64
Christy, Wray, 45 . this guy is suspect by the "friends" he keeps; bonded with CC really? Traffic in putrid, bridge-gate; now he wants to follow up with being slimed by 45....and what prey tell makes him FBI qualified.
This stinks; we just don't know how bad; Pence, Sessions, Carlson the track record is atrocious.
This stinks; we just don't know how bad; Pence, Sessions, Carlson the track record is atrocious.
30
I was part of a legal team that represented Exxon in the Valdez incident. Do I have the blood of baby otters on my hands?
If you want a system based on the rule of law, guess what? People who are trained experts in the law – – people called lawyers – – come along with that.
Commenters should stop attacking this guy until they learn more. Until they hear from people – – law-enforcement and legal professionals – – who have worked with him. His reputation is very solid among professionals.
If you want a system based on the rule of law, guess what? People who are trained experts in the law – – people called lawyers – – come along with that.
Commenters should stop attacking this guy until they learn more. Until they hear from people – – law-enforcement and legal professionals – – who have worked with him. His reputation is very solid among professionals.
7
"Commenters should stop attacking this guy until they learn more."
How true. But then the facts won't stop their accusations and name calling because any "facts" that don't fit the narrative are not ... well, not "factual" enough...
How true. But then the facts won't stop their accusations and name calling because any "facts" that don't fit the narrative are not ... well, not "factual" enough...
As long as Prince William Sound still suffers from the effects of the Exxon Valdez incident because Exxon has evaded its responsibilities to do a complete and thorough cleanup, yes, indeed you have the blood of baby otters on your hands. At this point, the blood of baby orcas, some pods of which will never recover.
What kind of a deal did you strike on behalf of Exxon?
What kind of a deal did you strike on behalf of Exxon?
A mainstream pick? Perhaps, but he will have the "stink" of Christie on him.
26
His credentials will not indicate if he can be influenced by the sitting President under investigation, who selected him. This is all wrong. Who will stand up and say, "this is wrong!!!"
29
Was Christie found guilty of anything? To the best of my knowledge he is still governor of New Jersey.
9
He has not been proved guilty of anything, but if you believe he didn't order up the traffic jam on the GW Bridge, you are guilty of naivete.
That does not mean he is not guilty.
6
Christie's clever defense attorney, Wray, fixed it so that Christie's aides took the fall and Christie could go skipping into the sunset.
1
He represented Chris Christie. Let that sink in a minute.
So our chief law enforcement agent in charge of an investigation on his own boss is demonstrably comfortable enabling corrupt politicians.
Yeah. That's going to work out well for the American people. Said with full on mock sarcasm.
So our chief law enforcement agent in charge of an investigation on his own boss is demonstrably comfortable enabling corrupt politicians.
Yeah. That's going to work out well for the American people. Said with full on mock sarcasm.
207
Wray was Christie's personal attorney when the governor's iPhone, that the defense wanted, went missing during the Bridgegate prosecution. I've seen what I think are suspect reports that Wray last had the phone, but don't know if that's true, and don't know if the phone was ever found.
105
The NY Times must scrutinize intensely the relationship of Christopher Wray's law firm and anyone in the white house especially the tyrant 45 himself! If anyone of the private lawyers to represent any White House official is affiliated with same law firm...we MUST not allow nomination to pass Senate!!!
134
would prefer "unimpeachable honor" to "impeccable credentials defending white-collar criminals".
73
In 2015 Christopher Wray along with other attorneys of King & Spalding strongly supported the nomination of Sally Yates as Deputy Attorney General.
Seems like Trump might have made a mistake and picked someone who is apolitical and more importantly qualified for the position. Wonders never cease!
Seems like Trump might have made a mistake and picked someone who is apolitical and more importantly qualified for the position. Wonders never cease!
56
Sort of like a broken clock that is correct twice a day.
The fellow is an active Republican supporter. The article states he donated over $35,000 to Republican candidates in recent years. He donated $7,500 to back Mitt Romney in 2012. The question is, does he have a conscience or is he an ideologue? Will he follow the Republican script blindly or will he seek justice? Will he use the law as an excuse to do evil or will he interpret the law as an instrument to justice, fairness, and the common good for all?
I hope you are right.
To date, the many stupid mistakes he has made, and the many ill-advised missteps he has taken, have all been to the detriment of the American people.
To date, the many stupid mistakes he has made, and the many ill-advised missteps he has taken, have all been to the detriment of the American people.
Basically a white collar crime defense attorney. Perfect, if you've committed white collar crimes.
95
Trump has picked a Christie crony that helped him avoid jail for Bridgegate- another stellar Trump appointment.
I assume DT will require Wray to pledge allegiance to his sovereignty as supreme despot.
The so called swamp has turned into a cesspool the size of an ocean.
I assume DT will require Wray to pledge allegiance to his sovereignty as supreme despot.
The so called swamp has turned into a cesspool the size of an ocean.
It's hard to imagine how anyone could accept this post in good conscience at this time.
46
I disagree. Accepting an appointment to head the FBI means swearing to defend the Constitution, not this President. Simply accepting an assignment doesn't place you on the side of the devil,
1
I do not know, but, to this reader, representing Christie in the Bridgegate scandal is a big minus for a nominee. It certainly testifies to his lawyering kill as a lawyer, but leaves questions regarding Wray's civic posture. He may be a highly respected lawyer, but, at times like this, more is needed of the FBI Director than superb professional skills.
27
What kind of a political hack would take a job in Trump's Justice Department? Something fishy about this guy.
23
Mr. Wray, how exactly did you pledge your loyalty to your master?
13
Based on the preliminary reporting, he appears to be a good choice. Lets see how long it takes the NYT or WP to report that some unnamed sources have dirt on him.
6
The dirt is already there. It's called Christie!
4
What a suprise! I was sure it would be Jared, maybe Ivanka.
126
Dan...I thought it was gonna be donald duck....
1
Eric Trump went to law school, but he is probably too busy grabbing up all the contracts he can while daddy is still in office.
At this point, we will have a watchful eye on whomever is nominated by Lying Trump, even with incredible credentials, and we should.
Because Lying Trump and his camp have given us the impression that they have something to hide concerning the Russian Investigation.
We need a thorough and impartial investigation. Anything short of such an effort cannot pass our scrutiny.
Because Lying Trump and his camp have given us the impression that they have something to hide concerning the Russian Investigation.
We need a thorough and impartial investigation. Anything short of such an effort cannot pass our scrutiny.
16
At this point, anyone willing to accept a nomination by Mr. Trump no longer has "impeccable credentials," sorry.
385
What are to do? Leave the position open until Trump leaves office?
Has Christopher Wray pledged his "Oath of Loyalty" to Donald J Trump to secure this position? Any connection of Wray to Gov. Chris Christie makes his appointment to head the FBI an unlikely one wants FBI investigations to be free from political interference.
32
Could be a preview of Christie's return as Attorney General.
32
Naah. Christie is persona non grata in the Trump White House because he threw Jared's daddy in jail.
Given the growing evidence that President Trump has sought to corrupt everyone involved in investigating him -- and the indisputable evidence that he sees loyalty to himself as the only quality worth valuing -- we have a right to expect very challenging questioning of Mr. Wray, under oath.
83
(Chuckle) Yale? Who knew Trump was such an elitist.... Could Bannon be on the outside again? Is there someone sane giving advice?
10
I find Trump revolting. This is one of his few quality decisions. I just hope Wray understands his allegiance is not to the President. Rather, his is an independent role charged with investigating criminal activity, including any wrongs committed inside government.
32
reply to Robert Honeyman: Why would he understand that? He has accepted an offer to work for the Trump Administration.
2
Ok, Senators. Dig deep and find out everything about this pick. Any of Trump's picks are suspect at this point. It is imperative that an FBI director be of Robert Mueller's sterling background. We are in deep muck and the director must be independent and fearless.
267
Does anyone else find the timing of this announcement to be suspect?
190
Not at all. Trump would never nominate a new FBI director the day before the testimony of the previous FBI director just to until then dominate the news again, or would he?
7
Anything coming from the Trump administration is suspect. especially of late.
8
Is there anything Trump does that's not suspect, or seemingly foolish?
4
As Chris Christie's personal attorney, Wray helped Christie avoid jail time over Bridgegate. Donald is obviously hoping Wray can perform the same magic act with the Trumps's myriad transgressions.
428
The Emoluments Clause violations are right there in full view, as are many of the conflicts of interest/self-dealing situations. So, at least two grounds are provable. And it remains to be seen whether any of his additional potential grounds for impeachment, such as collusion with a foreign power to interfere with U.S. elections or release of classified information to foreign powers, will be proven. That's what the hearings are for.
10
"What's interesting is that you cannot prove one "transgression" of Trump's that merits impeachment"
Emoluments Clause.
Emoluments Clause.
3
If you can't comment without name it says a lot about you, Scott.
As far as impeachable offences, DJT's ignorance and stupidity is reaching the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
As far as impeachable offences, DJT's ignorance and stupidity is reaching the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
1
"Time for a traffic jam in the Justice Dept..."
337
Now you know that if Trump is nominating him, and he's had dealings with Christie's rotten administration, he's obviously NOT "a man of impeccable credentials". I am predicting that he is not confirmed.
234
And did you also predict that Hillary Clinton would be president?
That Sessions would not be confirmed? That Gorsuch would not be seated?
You democrat kids are adorable. It's like you TRY to make us smile and laugh on a daily basis now.
That Sessions would not be confirmed? That Gorsuch would not be seated?
You democrat kids are adorable. It's like you TRY to make us smile and laugh on a daily basis now.
5
Here come the trumpeting trolls. As predictable as it is depressing.
2
its evidence that you have smoke in your eyes you are still not able to see the truth
Impeccable choice, the man certainly has an A+ track record of successfully representing historical crooks such as Christie.
388
Wray was part of the team that sought to make torture legal during 41's administration. Wray represented Christie in the Bridgegate investigation. Wray's a partisan Republican. Wray's law firm represents TWO Russian-government-owned gas companies, and since Wray is a partner in the firm he profits personally from that representation.
Well. other than that, impeccable.
LOL