Rather than concentrating on Hillary Clinton, the column by Mr. Brooks is about leadership. It's an excellent article and would make good reading for MBA students and all people aspiring to enter public life .
43
Thinking about 'experience' I said to a friend, "we'd die of pain if our experience didn't lead to some kind of wisdom." Unfortunately we are better at killing the pain in all kinds of ways than we are at working it into wisdom.
www.truthburp.blogspot.com
www.ceonotetoself.blogspot.com
www.truthburp.blogspot.com
www.ceonotetoself.blogspot.com
27
It's quaint, ain't it, how we look to our political types to be our pseudo-saviors, demi-gods, to be fawned after and adored, elevated onto pedestals so we can then knock 'em off into the dirt. Better they should be honest, intelligent, truthful, humble citizens who are willing to sacrifice some time and energy to manage our democracy while we pay the bills. But our species needs its 'gods' and when we discover there aren't any, we just make 'em up. To our never-ending disappointment.
22
Enough with the criticism of Hillary Clinton. Every word David Brooks writes from now until the election should be intended to counteract the cancer of ignorance and bigotry his party has unleashed on this country, and convincing the last three republicans not consumed by alt-right 4chan forums to vote ten times for every Democrat on the ticket. He's not going to do it of course, because in this country, the right-wing doesn't understand what's right.
140
I applaud your thesis and yearn for the graciousness in out leaders you describe. We share heroes, although I might add to your list—being much too present-minded—President Obama. However, graciousness in a President, or Senator, or civil rights leader, or designated world figure may be different from graciousness in a candidate for office these days in the United States. Secretary Clinton seems to me more of a Harry Truman sort (the 1948 Truman); she senses that the wolves are trying to surround and destroy her and she intends to fight back, much as Truman ungraciously fought back in 1948 to win an election still implanted in the minds of political nerds as a miracle. If Clinton wins in November, her election, too, will highlight the history books, for obvious reasons. Then history will praise her as it has Truman. At the moment of victory, let’s hope she reads and absorbs your counsel.
39
Just like Nixon, unseemly but not felonious behavior, followed by stonewalling, again and again through her (and his) public career. He never learned, until he stepped over the line into criminality. Will she?
21
While I can agree with you in theory, David, if I were in politics I'd have a hard time putting this into practice, and so would you I suspect. As for Hillary, the political landscape will never be mistaken for a level playing field when it comes to women. You are expecting from her a level of graciousness that I can't ever recall your expecting of any male political candidates in recent memory.
222
The thing that amazes me is the personal ignorance couched in these self serving sentences. David Brooks' cover is that he is a genteel, gracious leader.
I doubt that he is consciously playing this role, but if there was ever anyone who should not be throwing stones it is David Brooks.
The column is all about him, about how wise he is and how qualified he is to point out Hillary Clinton's character flaws. Man, the arrogance is stupefying!
He would not last ten inches if he were to try to walk in her shoes.
Get a life, David, or at least stop pontificating about other people who are actually alive.
I doubt that he is consciously playing this role, but if there was ever anyone who should not be throwing stones it is David Brooks.
The column is all about him, about how wise he is and how qualified he is to point out Hillary Clinton's character flaws. Man, the arrogance is stupefying!
He would not last ten inches if he were to try to walk in her shoes.
Get a life, David, or at least stop pontificating about other people who are actually alive.
236
Having an unfaithful husband with an ever-changing cast of lovers does tend to harden a woman's heart and mind while locking up her emotions. Hillary has endured Bill's wanderlust for female companionship for decades with resulting emotional and psychological scaring that has made her an introspective secretive person as self-defense from Bill's behavior.
Hillary is deeply resentful of her political marriage while lacking a sense of moral responsibility, hardly what one would call gracious with regard to others.
Hillary is deeply resentful of her political marriage while lacking a sense of moral responsibility, hardly what one would call gracious with regard to others.
40
In theory maybe 'it's never to late to learn from experience' but once the acorn has become a mature oak its hard for it to sprout some maple leaves.Why have she and WJC spent so much time and energy accumulating $100 million- wasn't 25 or 50 million enough? Reminds one of Donald Trump's answer to Barbara Walter's question 'How much is enough?' - 'Just a little bit more.' What personal imperatives/demons drive this woman?
13
"Gracious"? Lord have mercy. If Hilary were a man, we wouldn't be reading a column like this.
221
Good lord. Could this be any more condescending?
191
Every week David Brooks writes op-eds that leave me wondering why he is still employed
123
Wow, Brooks had to mention email scandal twice, the Rose Law Firm...how did he forget to include that Hillary murdered Vince Foster? Brooks you have to accept that being a Republican has become synonymous with being a racist. That is the most gracious thing I can say in response to this absurd column.
141
Can we just keep the President we have? He seems to have all the traits Mr. Brooks identifies as lacking in Ms. Clinton and others. We went with Candidate Obama 8 years ago, instead of Ms. Clinton for the very reasons of which Mr. Brooks writes. These last 8 years Ms. Clinton has copied Candidate Obama's campaign infrastructure but unfortunately not the easy fluidity that honesty affords one and with which President Obama handles every occasion.
40
I think after enduring twenty-five years of unremittingly bitter attacks from the right and left, from enemies and so-called friends, Hillary's pretty darn gracious.
253
David
You are running out of angles and it's showing. This article was nonsensical.
You are running out of angles and it's showing. This article was nonsensical.
96
Mr. Brooks, after all your expressed dismay over the Orange One now you're going to start the attack on Hillary. Did the RNC folks finally counsel to you to stop complaining about him and start going after her? Your arguments are weak, at best, and telling her to be more graceful is both sexist and demeaning. How graceful has he been so far? And will his sticking to point and reading from the teleprompter make him a better leader? September is looming and the republicans have to rally their forces in earnest, so we should see this as your opening salvo for them?
76
I feel embarrassed for you, Mr. Brooks. I've enjoyed your sparring on NPR with E.J. Dionne, but feel that this time you've gone too far:
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad."
After years of character assassination by the Far Right, the millions spent on trashing her, how could you, as a reasonable person, expect Hillary to be as naive and hopeful as you expect her to be? It would be nice - Hillary would appreciate it - if her opponents were fair, but you're writing about a woman who's been accused of everything including murder.
How dare you lecture to her about character! She could give you - and most of us - a few lessons.
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad."
After years of character assassination by the Far Right, the millions spent on trashing her, how could you, as a reasonable person, expect Hillary to be as naive and hopeful as you expect her to be? It would be nice - Hillary would appreciate it - if her opponents were fair, but you're writing about a woman who's been accused of everything including murder.
How dare you lecture to her about character! She could give you - and most of us - a few lessons.
203
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad." And if you can keep up that cheerful attitude after four years of relentless attacks by Fox News, and unending harrassment by bogus Congressional commitees whose primary purpose is character assassination, then perhaps you deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Gandhi, Lincoln and Mandela. But she's not running against any of those three.
93
As Wally used to say to The Beaver, "This is rich." Thank you, David, for this timely paen to gracious living. One can only hope that HRC will read it soon! Like you, I find her "whiff of inhumanity" so very off-putting.
Now, where was a similar column when the likes of McConnell, Boehner, Cruz, Christie, Gingrich, Perry, Santorum and other vicious attack dogs were running amok?
Oh my, was that ungracious of me to point that out?
Now, where was a similar column when the likes of McConnell, Boehner, Cruz, Christie, Gingrich, Perry, Santorum and other vicious attack dogs were running amok?
Oh my, was that ungracious of me to point that out?
129
Wake up, Mr. Brooks! Wake up! You are looking at a person of grace and that is Hillary Clinton. Don't miss the opportunity to proclaim her grace from your journalistic mountaintop.
Watch. Watch. Watch again her speech in Nevada this week. Tell me that are not the words of a wise and gracious leader. When others sat down to tyranny, she stood up. She stood up for us all.
Watch. Watch. Watch again her speech in Nevada this week. Tell me that are not the words of a wise and gracious leader. When others sat down to tyranny, she stood up. She stood up for us all.
120
Hey David, follow your own "punditry" and look for the "good news in people and not the bad..." Never heard you say anything good about Hillary Clinton. Even when she became the first woman to be nominated for president by a major political party. You called this monumental accomplishment "old news." Women of Hillary Clinton's generation...I'm one of them...love her to pieces. We think she'll be a wonderful, caring President, who "sweats about the details" because details count when they affect us, our families, our communities, and, yes, our world.
116
I sometimes wonder if your dear Mr. Brooks lives in a cloud...or a vacuum.
47
I guess she's not as gracious as your Republican criminal friends, who spent the last eight years practicing unwavering, seditious, racist opposition to anything President Obama tried to do to clean up the mess YOUR war criminal Republican president left the country in. As chief apologist and water carrier for these people, you can devote your next column to explaining how gracious THEY are.
168
Mr Brooks, you have reversed yourself and are back to your conservative nit-picking ways. By your tossing a bit of fuel onto the fire about Mrs Clinton, you are aiding your GOP aspirants, whom you have previously acknowledged are less than helpful for the general good of the USA.
We are electing a President, not a chief rabbi, Pope or Ayatollah. The sad reality remains, the far right fringe of the GOP and Populist movements, in fact does have the Clintons in their sights for any number of inane conspiratorial reasons. The educated and pragmatic view is simple: She is truly the best qualified for the job POTUS. Whether she changes her hair colour, wears Gucci shoes, or forgets to change a jacket that has a coffee stain, her job as POTUS is to respond to all factual evidence that agrees with OR conflicts with her initial thoughts, consult with well experienced and educated council and then make her decision. She is well respected around the world (as is her husband). We, the USA, are part of a global community and she knows this. Nothing else matter - E-mails, talking engagements, helping others through the Foundation, is a smoke screen by the GOP and others.
We are electing a President, not a chief rabbi, Pope or Ayatollah. The sad reality remains, the far right fringe of the GOP and Populist movements, in fact does have the Clintons in their sights for any number of inane conspiratorial reasons. The educated and pragmatic view is simple: She is truly the best qualified for the job POTUS. Whether she changes her hair colour, wears Gucci shoes, or forgets to change a jacket that has a coffee stain, her job as POTUS is to respond to all factual evidence that agrees with OR conflicts with her initial thoughts, consult with well experienced and educated council and then make her decision. She is well respected around the world (as is her husband). We, the USA, are part of a global community and she knows this. Nothing else matter - E-mails, talking engagements, helping others through the Foundation, is a smoke screen by the GOP and others.
269
Hillary and Bill have been under attack since 1979 by the GOPers and their fellow travelers. They have become legalistic and vague to avoid being crushed. Is this wrong?
48
"Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness." Thank you, DB
9
I had an odd whiff of the ghost of Richard Nixon ( a very capable leader with fatal characters flaws) reading and thinking about HRM here today. Nixon was so battered by his lack of confidence as he emerged from strained beginnings hereabouts in SoCal that for all his capacities he never transcended them. HRM learned political leadership at the right hand of WJC but seemed to emerge with a seeming Manichean mindset,with clear delineations between good and evil, and with maybe less capacity for seeing how people can be both. And whereas Bill was nothing if not brilliantly dexterous, Hil is today like David in Saul's armour, and she can neither dance nor parse nor charm like Bill. Still, what she has is a genuine and powerful moral core. It is to be hoped that this will serve us all well as she emerges as our president.
18
One of the most sexist columns ever. For a man so well read, Mr. Brooks has a remarkably high "cluelessness quotient". Perhaps that is because common sense and judgement don't come out of books, but out of life. That is why Ghandi, Lincoln and Mandela had it and Mr. Brooks is so lacking.
62
Do you think America will ever fully acknowledge and appreciate one of the most truly gracious leaders it's ever had, President Barack Obama. His ability to respond to the conscious and unconscious racism and slanderous hate with rationality, understanding, and calm tolerance is simply amazing.
92
I think that this is the best article I've ever read by David. It is an inquiry into the soul of man, and in this case the person is woman. Hillary has wrapped herself in a burden...the fear that she is not allowed to make mistakes. It is a self imposed burden that has as its foundation mileniums of mysogany imposed upon 'the weaker' sex by we men...we fools. Trump aids, promotes, and supports this condition of fear...this sin of pride. He is a Neanderthal and she must learn that her fear and her pride supports that position. She must trust us...we citizens...that we forgive the mistake but are replelled by the cover-up. She has to cast away pride and forgive herself that she too will make mistakes. Confession is good for the soul...and also for one's public image.
7
Slightly surreal to see a column decrying the insufficient graciousness of Hillary Clinton, rather than the crude braying of her opponent.
69
Sorry to have to repeat your words, but i find them ironic. One could be positive you are talking about The Donald if one did not know better.
"There’s an act of unseemly but not felonious behavior, then the futile drawn-out withholding of information, and forever after the unwillingness to ever come clean."
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside. Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness."
"There’s an act of unseemly but not felonious behavior, then the futile drawn-out withholding of information, and forever after the unwillingness to ever come clean."
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside. Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness."
5
Nice thoughts and wishes, however the way of American politics at this moment, is very far from "a friendly and hopeful place".
7
i think Don Miguel Ruiz said it best:
1. Be Impeccable With Your Word.
2. Don't Take Anything Personally.
3. Don't Make Assumptions.
4. Always Do Your Best.
(The Four Agreements, 1997)
1. Be Impeccable With Your Word.
2. Don't Take Anything Personally.
3. Don't Make Assumptions.
4. Always Do Your Best.
(The Four Agreements, 1997)
5
Thank you, David Brooks for a lesson in life. Grace needs to be modeled for our neighbor, our life partner and our children This is the only path to the growth of grace in our world.
4
If David Brooks took his own advice, he'd endorse Hillary Clinton! But we can't expect that kind of real-life honesty from a columnist who can't give up his allegience to Republican principles that died many decades ago. It's telling that he has no substantive criticism of Hillary Clinton.
50
Sometimes, Mr. Brooks, you have to walk in someone's shoes before you should criticize them. I am not a dedicated Hillary Booster (yes I will be voting for her in November since the choice this year is exceptionally bleak). But to address the soul of your column today, I ask that you consider over this weekend how friendly and hopeful you would still be after 30 some years of the most careless and baseless criticism from opponents, the media and the addle-brained as well. The fact that Hillary is still able to function at the high level that she does (albeit not to perfection as Mr. Brooks would prefer) is a tribute to her grit and determination. In 2016 that should be enough to get you elected.
60
David Brooks' Aug 26, 2016 Op-Ed reminded me of my sense of disappointment when Hillary Clinton, for the most part, didn't acknowledge the applause she received during her acceptance speech at the Democratic convention. President Obama, on the other, graciously paused to say "thank you" following each round of applause.
6
I'm trying to imagine how enormous David Brooks's sense of his own importance must be for him to condescend so grandly to Hillary Clinton. I'm failing.
42
I generally agree with this essay and the value of grace. Having said that, before you accuse Ms. Clinton of a lack of grace you need to acknowledge the relentless string of hateful and overwhelmingly baseless accusations she has been tarred with over the past 25 years. Without forgiving her faults and missteps, I would argue that it shows tremendous grace to keep climbing back into the ring after so many low blows.
48
Among the gracious you did not mention the one obvious person that should be on this list. Our president's conspicuous absence from your article suggests to me that you will continue to find ways to exculpate your role in enabling the catastrophe that is today's GOP.
61
Sometimes it's hard to transcend one's flaws and scars without long-term therapy. And, of course, if the press/oppo research finds out you've been in therapy, watch out!
Though we are all advised against "armchair analysis", it doesn't seem too far-fetched to remember this: As a child, Hillary was constantly shamed by her unforgiving father from the time she was very small. She also had to regularly endure her father's shaming of her mother. I think we can all imagine how deep dark responses could endure into adult life, when one is relentlessly called out, and in front of the world.
Though we are all advised against "armchair analysis", it doesn't seem too far-fetched to remember this: As a child, Hillary was constantly shamed by her unforgiving father from the time she was very small. She also had to regularly endure her father's shaming of her mother. I think we can all imagine how deep dark responses could endure into adult life, when one is relentlessly called out, and in front of the world.
1
I do not know if ms clinton is a gracious leader or not, she does have clear flaws that exhibit themselves time and time again. However i do believe that our current president is easily one of the most gracious leaders that I have seen in my lifetime. why no mention of him if the discussion is theoretical, and not for explaining why you want to vote for hillary without owning that vote?
24
Only one mention, one mention in this article about the presidential race, of the tornado of racism and bigotry that has taken over this man's party. Shameful.
35
Grace is not very exciting these days. It's just being kind and offering goodwill to our friends and enemies. So simple but not exciting.
2
In this interesting, albeit highly political article, David Brooks neglected to mention President Obama, who, according to Mr. Brooks' description, is one of those leaders he so admires. As to Hillary Clinton, it seems to me Mr. Brooks is simply finding a way to discredit her, as a good Republican should still be trying to do. My feeling is he will vote for her in spite of his views professed in this article.
19
Well, Mr. Brooks, since there is absolutely nothing positive you can say about the current state of Republican affairs, the best you could do was write a rather lame piece on Clinton. I disagree completely, by the way. Clinton has been relentlessly attacked by Republicans for decades. And yes, I believe it is largely because she is a strong no-nonsense woman. We women of a certain age have very deep battle scars, and yes, they can make one a bit brittle.
55
For me, Hillary Clinton is the definition of grace under pressure, and I do mean pressure. Why in the world should she treat the world (and the journalists in it) as a "friendly" place? She has been attacked and the press has been all to eager to pick up any right wing assertion about the Clintons. I am often impressed by David Brooks' thoughtful commentaries, but this is off the rails, and for me--a woman close to Clinton's age--it smacks of the kind of double standard women are often held to.
31
"Sooner or later life teaches you that you’re not the center of the universe, nor quite as talented or good as you thought. "
-----------------------
That's the stuff of sophistry, David, completely contrary - with allowance for Shakespeare's observation that dotage comes at the end of the human role - to experience.
The Donald has learned, with lots of evidence from his political science handlers, that he can even play the dotty role, as long as there are promises of lots of revenge, waiting in the wings, for the hurting people in his audience.
-----------------------
That's the stuff of sophistry, David, completely contrary - with allowance for Shakespeare's observation that dotage comes at the end of the human role - to experience.
The Donald has learned, with lots of evidence from his political science handlers, that he can even play the dotty role, as long as there are promises of lots of revenge, waiting in the wings, for the hurting people in his audience.
6
There's so much wrong with this column. First of all, Brooks omitted President Barack Obama, who under the constant disrespect and silly, immature behavior of The Republican party, has stood graciously in the role of president. History will be kind to Obama. Hillary Clinton has endured constant Republican attacks, and look, she's inching closer to becoming the next president. Brooks' lame, less than gracious whine, doesn't hold water.
36
'Whiff of inhumanity?' Thanks, Mr. Brooks, now that gem will be endlessly retweeted by your conservative compatriots.
Inhumanity is fomenting hatred. I haven't time to bust out my collected works this morning, but I'm pretty sure John Keats wouldn't be a supporter of the current Republican mindset. In my opinion, Sec. Clinton is the embodiment of grace under pressure.
You guys have been gunning for her forever. Why wouldn't she assume a defensive posture. If I was her, I'd sleep under a Kevlar bedspread.
I always thought you were a gracious gentleman. Kindly save your comportment advice for your candidate. He could use use and it isn't nice to criticize others if they haven't asked for your advice.
Inhumanity is fomenting hatred. I haven't time to bust out my collected works this morning, but I'm pretty sure John Keats wouldn't be a supporter of the current Republican mindset. In my opinion, Sec. Clinton is the embodiment of grace under pressure.
You guys have been gunning for her forever. Why wouldn't she assume a defensive posture. If I was her, I'd sleep under a Kevlar bedspread.
I always thought you were a gracious gentleman. Kindly save your comportment advice for your candidate. He could use use and it isn't nice to criticize others if they haven't asked for your advice.
30
An alternative view would see that she has apologized many times and learned her lesson, but her enemies refuse to show any graciousness and continue to try to use this as a weapon against her.
22
Brooks is adding so much personal fluff to all this body language and non vergal comminication which he is not qualified to assess? His degree is in History and not in communication or psychology? He should let his Canadian candor and so called politeness direct his nasty write up?
6
With the years of service, Hillary Clinton has had to learn to take sharp blows and develop sharp elbows. During Bill Clinton's administration she tried to reshape healthcare only to hit a stone wall. When she stood by Bill she was vilified by different segments of society. With constant attacks on her personhood, it's hard to be constantly gracious.
Those who know her say she is warm, gracious and laughs. My feeling is that she doesn't need to be overly gracious- she needs to be a strong leader.
Who are those who question her demeanor? The good old boys from the GOP. Should we even care what they think?
David, even Ghandi had sharp elbows when he needed them.
Those who know her say she is warm, gracious and laughs. My feeling is that she doesn't need to be overly gracious- she needs to be a strong leader.
Who are those who question her demeanor? The good old boys from the GOP. Should we even care what they think?
David, even Ghandi had sharp elbows when he needed them.
39
A beautifully-written thesis. I plan to re-read it a few more times over the next few weeks, to fully integrate these wise viewpoints (sorry that my genuine reaction sounds like that of a sycophant). I greatly admire how your perspective has evolved these past several months, demonstrating your own gracious maturity and integrity. Whatever you are doing, or pondering; keep on doing it! Please don't permit the reflexively-negative criticism by some of the other commentators on this site to diminish your candor, as may have regrettably happened to Mrs. Clinton.
4
Yes, the Clintons are not very good at handling their mistakes, but they're also a bit like a child who gets beaten with a belt for spilling some milk. How many Benghazi investigations did she endure? What are we even talking about any more with the email "scandal"? Yes, she shouldn't have used a private server to keep her personal emails private. How much more can this story be beaten? She didn't go through the 60,000 or whatever the number of emails. The fact that there are now 15,000 more is really not something she had any direct control over. And once you get beyond the "missing" emails, where is the controversy? She hasn't been shown to have done anything wrong...People like Melinda Gates donated to her charity and got access. That's how our government works. Senators take contributions and give those contributors access. I'd rather the money go to charity than to a senator's re-election fund...Yes, HRC is not the most gracious person--and maybe she is in person/one-on-one, but you beat a child long enough, they're going to lose their sense of trust and close themselves off.
25
Republican politicians have used my tax dollars to hound the Clintons for decades -- to no end. None of those GOP predators could survive even a tenth of the scrutiny given to Hillary. NONE. Not one.
So if Hillary is a little guarded now, only an ungracious columnist could complain.
So if Hillary is a little guarded now, only an ungracious columnist could complain.
51
On the other hand, years of repeated and often unmerited public attacks on one's character and one's family, even if merited by her husband's personal immorality of which she had no part, may have led understandably to the demeanor Mr. Brooks criticizes.
14
I'm trying to imagine who David Brooks has in mind as a role model for feminine graciousness. Think of a pretty bouquet to grace a table surrounded by men. Not to disparage any of these wonderful actresses, but how about Audrey Hepburn? Grace Kelly? Maybe none better than Olivia De Havilland as Melody Hamilton in Gone With The Wind.
13
You'd written about the difference between a vocation and a career. For Hillary, the past 4 decades has more been like a career. She probably has achieved more than she could have had she made it a "vocation." America isn't ready then for a woman to lead. Fast forward 40 years later, women has changed in America, and Hillary has also changed. America has "made it better" for women with regards to opportunity and fairness at the workplace as well as the public arena. Surely, we have far to go, and sacrifices have been made in the home, but to be successful for a woman in America is also to just do and is "never having to say you're sorry." While I disagree with this notion, men has gotten away for so long, why can't women, and why the double standards? The road to Vocational Stardom is often short-lived. President Obama has hinted that he is still early in his journey, and may even make a "career" being an ex-POTUS staying around the Hill a little longer, and also while "Michelle" attends the kids going to college. Hillary on the other hand, is at the end of a long career. There is nothing left really but vocational aspirations - Her Way.
We can all but hope so.
We can all but hope so.
5
If the worse criticism of Hillary Clinton is that she is, "Not gracious enough" to be a great President, I can only imagine what you would say about The Donald. Trump's lack of basic good manners when campaigning, self control and his inability to avoid publicly insulting at least one or two groups of people, nations or cultures every other day is now becoming a thing of legend. Hillary, in contrast, over her 30 odd years in public service has won multiple accolades from a multiplicity of sources (friends and foes alike) for her preparation, tuffness, presentation, native intelligence, caring and ability and willingness to negotiate. So please, if the worst criticism of a potential President of the United States is that she is ,"Not gracious" perhaps you ought to take a long and serious look at the alternative.
12
“Grace” has been defined as “the love and mercy given to us (by God or others) because (God or a person) desires people to have it, not because of anything we have done to earn it.” In God's case, it requires God’s limitless ability to forgive. Of course God is not hurt by humans' Envy, Gluttony, Greed, Lust, Pride, Sloth and Wrath (the deadly sins). It is this forgiveness and acceptance by God that helps believers strive to practice Kindness, Temperance, Charity, Chastity, Humility, Diligence and Patience (the seven virtues). Practicing theses virtues are required to give Grace (be "gracious") to others.
Since Hillary has had to defend herself against unrelenting vicious attacks by Republicans and the "media"vicious over the past decades (groups that have come to embrace and embody the seven sins) and has been wounded and ravaged by them, it is a bit much to ask her to develop God’s ability to forgive.
I absolutely agree that the world desperately needs "gracious leaders," but criticizing Hillary for the lack of graciousness when her opponents embody the opposite seems unfair.
She happens to be running against the current poster child for the proud embracing of Envy, Gluttony, Greed, Lust, Pride, Sloth and Wrath and the "one" who surrounds himself with a posse of graceless minions.
Since Hillary has had to defend herself against unrelenting vicious attacks by Republicans and the "media"vicious over the past decades (groups that have come to embrace and embody the seven sins) and has been wounded and ravaged by them, it is a bit much to ask her to develop God’s ability to forgive.
I absolutely agree that the world desperately needs "gracious leaders," but criticizing Hillary for the lack of graciousness when her opponents embody the opposite seems unfair.
She happens to be running against the current poster child for the proud embracing of Envy, Gluttony, Greed, Lust, Pride, Sloth and Wrath and the "one" who surrounds himself with a posse of graceless minions.
12
The case for Hilary's alleged lack of "grace" seems to rest on her having been involved in repeated "scandals." It may have escaped your notice, Mr. Brooks, but the leaders you cite--Lincoln, Gandhi, Mandela, etc.--each endured one or two scandals themselves. A contemporary David Brooks, serving as an apologist for the political opponents of these great leaders, would likely have suggested that they brought their troubles upon themselves with their stubbornness, arrogance, and refusal to learn their lessons. Only with benefit of hindsight does it becomes manifestly to all that the challenges these people faced were mostly ginned up by a vicious and unscrupulous opposition. Hilary Clinton may not be another Abraham Lincoln, but I think something similar will be the case with her. A David Brooks thirty years hence may even find occasion to laud her grace under fire.
7
I long ago came to the conclusion that whatever Hillary Clinton might say or do is never going to be palatable or enough to about 40% of Americans, who are largely of the conservative bent. Given this fact (or opinion, as some might call it), Hillary is still trying to reach out to this 40% because they have been saddled with the inexplicable Trump, from whom at least some seek to dissociate.
If one had to dispassionately look at the evolution of Hillary Clinton as a leader on the national scene, she has only gotten better and better from First Lady to Senator to Secretary of State. So Mr. Brooks can rest assured that even as “Hillary Clinton gets to decide what sort of leader she wants to be,” she would further evolve into an even better president of the United States.
If one had to dispassionately look at the evolution of Hillary Clinton as a leader on the national scene, she has only gotten better and better from First Lady to Senator to Secretary of State. So Mr. Brooks can rest assured that even as “Hillary Clinton gets to decide what sort of leader she wants to be,” she would further evolve into an even better president of the United States.
15
Come down from your ivory tower, Mr. Brooks. Those of us down here on the ground see a fire-breathing dragon slinking toward our villages and farms and threatening to turn what we have built into a wasteland. We had a gracious president for eight years and his graciousness just fed the dragon. Judging from her recent speech, Hillary Clinton is girding her loins to slay the dragon and vanquish the barbarians at our gate. It is good to remember that those in towers are not safe either.
27
I don't disagree with anything in this piece in concept. But the sheer brutality of American presidential campaigns makes graciousness unimportant if not a liability because the choice of behaving graciously is holds tremendous risk that can't necessarily be foreseen. Trump's is a campaign that attacked a long-term senate-serving former pow in McCain, and the parents of a fallen hero--what more humble embodiments of civil service can there be? If you want to disregard Trump attacks because they backfire so often, Republicans also mounted very successful attacks on Kerry's service and McCain's adoptive parenthood. The indecency in these demands self-protection.
We have heard that Hillary is much more personable and likeable when she is in office. We have heard and see that she is not a natural at selling herself. I will reserve judgment until, as I hope, she is in office. But if the Republicans keep up the viciousness, what can you expect of a human being? And tell me--is there any graciousness from Republican Leadership? who, in their racism, aside from what has been mentioned--won't give the President's Supreme Court nominee a hearing? I see none on that side--zero, even with all the years of their experience.
We have heard that Hillary is much more personable and likeable when she is in office. We have heard and see that she is not a natural at selling herself. I will reserve judgment until, as I hope, she is in office. But if the Republicans keep up the viciousness, what can you expect of a human being? And tell me--is there any graciousness from Republican Leadership? who, in their racism, aside from what has been mentioned--won't give the President's Supreme Court nominee a hearing? I see none on that side--zero, even with all the years of their experience.
23
If Mr. Brooks can work with a genetic engineer to program all this into a single human being… and engineer a human who can also get elected president in an era when voters only want candidates who are forceful, commanding and entertaining… he will deserve the Nobel Prize of the century!
All I know is that many people who have personally worked with Hillary Clinton have many positive things to say about her, while the only people who personally know Donald Trump and say anything positive about him are employees and family members. I don’t hear anyone say that Hillary Clinton has cheated them out of thousands of dollars. I don’t see Hillary suing thousands of people out of spite. (OK, maybe not all of Trump’s 3,500 lawsuits were out of spite… but many were.)
The world has certainly become a better place because of Lincoln, Gandhi, Mandela, et al, but I seriously doubt that any of them could have survived today’s uber mean political climate.
All I know is that many people who have personally worked with Hillary Clinton have many positive things to say about her, while the only people who personally know Donald Trump and say anything positive about him are employees and family members. I don’t hear anyone say that Hillary Clinton has cheated them out of thousands of dollars. I don’t see Hillary suing thousands of people out of spite. (OK, maybe not all of Trump’s 3,500 lawsuits were out of spite… but many were.)
The world has certainly become a better place because of Lincoln, Gandhi, Mandela, et al, but I seriously doubt that any of them could have survived today’s uber mean political climate.
18
I so appreciate your thoughtful analysis of the political issues of the day, and enjoy reading your books and those you recommend, such as "Tribe." We need to improve our characters, embrace our duties and grow from our experiences. I was taught to start with trust in any new relationship. I was also taught, "Burn me once, shame on you; burn me twice, shame on me." I think differently, however, about your assertion that "The political system is not working as it should". The nation is not agreed on the best way forward, and the Constitution, with its many checks and balances, was drafted to "hit pause when agitated". Through education, persuasion, compromise and dialogue we will continue to address our most pressing problems (such as too much money in politics) as we always have. I am often amazed at how uninformed my fellow citizens are about the viciousness of past American politics. Today is no different than the the days of smear campaigns waged against Thomas Jefferson, and certainly better than the days when politicians took to the streets with guns to settlement disputes with duels to the death.
1
The thing about government is people decide whether to forgive the mistakes or not. We choose to remember the Lincolns of history for their contributions instead of their mistakes. Others are remembered for their mistakes instead of contributions. Is it really their graciousness or lack of it that determines how we remember them? I don't think so. It's all in the eye of the beholder. It's based on our own beliefs and worldview, and how we choose to view people. Trump supporters don't seem to care about graciousness, or that he points out the exact defects in others that he is blind to in himself. Clinton supporters don't care about emails, or missteps with philanthropy, or how much she reveals about those things. They look at contributions each will make to the world they want to live in.
8
David Brooks has become irrelevant. He is irrelevant because he has lost integrity. As an act of humility and graciousness, he could admit that the Republican Party, as exemplified by its Presidential candidate, is concerned only with money and power and could give a hoot about what is good for American citizens in general.
But he knows where his bread is buttered and wants continued access to the feeding trough, and so he continues his petty drivel intended to obfuscate.
But he knows where his bread is buttered and wants continued access to the feeding trough, and so he continues his petty drivel intended to obfuscate.
24
I find Hillary Clinton to be most gracious. You can see it when she is listening and trying to work out a responsible reply and/or solution. She is firm and possesses a determination to further discourse, policy and action toward high ideals. She is gracious and she asks us to be too. Perhaps that is too much to ask?
22
Yeh, good meditation on the responsibilities of leadership. But, try being a woman, heading into an election where witch hunts abound, and have been for years. I find Mrs. Clinton to be a savvy woman, unapologetic at many levels, but perhaps she needn't be any other way. True, all outcomes rest on the shoulders heavily on leaders that sometimes have direct bearing on those outcomes, but I suspect the wave of pushing and pulling in advice and opinions (that could knock just about anyone over, in national leadership roles)have kept outcomes in the public very muted and convoluted. In other words, what we don't know about Hillary and her decisions which I suspect are a plenty, makes manufacturing an opinion about gracious leadership somewhat part of the push and pull. Journalism is a funny thing, where it could make or break a leader, Hillary just keeps on keeping on and I trust she is learning from her experiences. As to what those experiences truly are, only she knows. Not necessarily what we all think she should know. good. But a noteworthy piece of thought on how one should lead. Let's all practice this altruism and see how we affect the changes in our lives.
5
This is another attempt by David Brooks to restore "balance" in his pontification about the two candidates. But it hardly seems fair to say that Hillary is not a graceful leader when she is competing an opponent of the Neanderthal variety.
It takes great courage, skills, and preparation for her to confront Donald Trump for his political campaign of division. No one in the Republican Party had the guts and ability to call Trump for what he is.
As for the emails and Clinton Foundation correspondence. These are really nonissue at this point. The emails that are public from Douglas Band is what we adults call polite conversation: One would always pass on the request, but do not necessary expect that it would be fulfilled
It takes great courage, skills, and preparation for her to confront Donald Trump for his political campaign of division. No one in the Republican Party had the guts and ability to call Trump for what he is.
As for the emails and Clinton Foundation correspondence. These are really nonissue at this point. The emails that are public from Douglas Band is what we adults call polite conversation: One would always pass on the request, but do not necessary expect that it would be fulfilled
18
Mr. Brooks -
As always, you express things that at in my heart. I agree that Hillary Clinton's level of defense is higher than it needs to be in the current environment - and that the difference between her perception of the threat and the reality of it fuels an unnecessarily perpetually high level of attack. She (and we) would be served if it was reduced.
But - respectfully sir - it takes two to tango. I would ask you - is characterizing her as someone who "does not seem to have been transformed by [her experiences]", and is therefore ungracious, any less out of line with the reality? In the specific case of the email response you may be correct - but I believe that it is disingenuous and (fallacious) to take it as representative. As I understand it, she seems to have learned many lessons for the health care fight in the 90's - and she seems to have applied those lessons when she went to the Senate. She campaigned for and served for Obama. I believe you do her (and us - your readers) a disservice by not recognizing this. It mischaracterizes mole hills as mountains.
I am respectful of your call for her to be better - and I know she's asking us to vote for her to lead the free world and you are not. But - I would ask you – is it not important that we live by the same rules? I know you do not want to be be complicit in "normalizing" a penchant for secrecy. However, even while we call for her to be better - is it not still important that we be the best we can as an example?
As always, you express things that at in my heart. I agree that Hillary Clinton's level of defense is higher than it needs to be in the current environment - and that the difference between her perception of the threat and the reality of it fuels an unnecessarily perpetually high level of attack. She (and we) would be served if it was reduced.
But - respectfully sir - it takes two to tango. I would ask you - is characterizing her as someone who "does not seem to have been transformed by [her experiences]", and is therefore ungracious, any less out of line with the reality? In the specific case of the email response you may be correct - but I believe that it is disingenuous and (fallacious) to take it as representative. As I understand it, she seems to have learned many lessons for the health care fight in the 90's - and she seems to have applied those lessons when she went to the Senate. She campaigned for and served for Obama. I believe you do her (and us - your readers) a disservice by not recognizing this. It mischaracterizes mole hills as mountains.
I am respectful of your call for her to be better - and I know she's asking us to vote for her to lead the free world and you are not. But - I would ask you – is it not important that we live by the same rules? I know you do not want to be be complicit in "normalizing" a penchant for secrecy. However, even while we call for her to be better - is it not still important that we be the best we can as an example?
4
Everyone is fallible. Gandhi's public persona was was full of grace but he also admitted to beating his wife in private. The act in public served the political purpose of forcing the British into surrendering to the Indians' demands for Independence. As a political tool today, grace simply doesn't work.
2
What are you saying Brooks? Clinton needs to loosen up a bit and trust a little more? This whole piece seems so tone deaf in terms of the kind of politics we are mired in.
What we really need is a considerate conservative voice to critically and honestly, with no qualification, dissects the deceitful politics that the Right has hurled upon this country, jeopardizing not only our current government and standing in the world, but our future democracy. How does democracy work if we can't even talk to each other?
Until we know we are sick, how we are sick, we cannot begin to search for the cure. That is where we are. Is our problem debt or crumbling infrastructure? Are our corporations paying too much taxes or are they ruining our environment, short and long term? Too many hard working Americans are being left behind or too many Americans have become moochers addicted to our welfare system? Is it our moral humanity to help people from war torn and feminine ravished country by allowing them immigrate here or can we help in other ways? What is the best way or is there a way to resolve civils wars in Syria, Somalia...?
But at this point, we can't even agree if Obama is an American, how are we to engage each other in the above much more complicated questions? What, Brooks, do you have to say to that?
What we really need is a considerate conservative voice to critically and honestly, with no qualification, dissects the deceitful politics that the Right has hurled upon this country, jeopardizing not only our current government and standing in the world, but our future democracy. How does democracy work if we can't even talk to each other?
Until we know we are sick, how we are sick, we cannot begin to search for the cure. That is where we are. Is our problem debt or crumbling infrastructure? Are our corporations paying too much taxes or are they ruining our environment, short and long term? Too many hard working Americans are being left behind or too many Americans have become moochers addicted to our welfare system? Is it our moral humanity to help people from war torn and feminine ravished country by allowing them immigrate here or can we help in other ways? What is the best way or is there a way to resolve civils wars in Syria, Somalia...?
But at this point, we can't even agree if Obama is an American, how are we to engage each other in the above much more complicated questions? What, Brooks, do you have to say to that?
11
A well written piece and I would hope for those kind of politicians (and people in general). I have to agree with another reader who posits that in today's toxic environment such traits may be appreciated by those who share her policies but derided endlessly in the most caustic by those who don't. (Probably would end up making some bizarre case for being an attitude flip-flopper.)
Mrs Clinton knows how to talk convincingly to many blacks, immigrants, and a good number of working women. But her emails show that none of them know how to talk to her. Really, like a trained pet, she listens and changes her behavior to the voice of only one master. She really only listens to Bill. And he is anything but gracious.
Even many wealthy donors to the Clinton Foundation were misled by Bill. Most believed his subtle (and not so subtle) hints that his wife the Secretary of State and himself would look favorably on any of their requests in her official power for a donation. But the Clintons knew from their own lawsuits how to defraud legally so the donors were mostly disappointed. Many of the foundation donors were, in fact, then, royally had. And there was nothing gracious about how both Clintons deceived those foundation donors.
Even many wealthy donors to the Clinton Foundation were misled by Bill. Most believed his subtle (and not so subtle) hints that his wife the Secretary of State and himself would look favorably on any of their requests in her official power for a donation. But the Clintons knew from their own lawsuits how to defraud legally so the donors were mostly disappointed. Many of the foundation donors were, in fact, then, royally had. And there was nothing gracious about how both Clintons deceived those foundation donors.
President Obama was "gracious" towards the Republican Party, giving them chance after chance to come up with ideas and engage in debate, to compromise. It got him nowhere. He was too gracious. What tempers graciousness? Toughness. Hillary is gracious, but she is tough. How do you handle 25 years of unrelentingly vicious attacks from the likes of Donald Trump, Newt Gingrich, Bill O'Reilly, Carl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, and their base of haters? These are the icons of ungracious behavior. How do you counter them? With toughness.
If someone is constantly confronted by situations that require a tough response, it may be difficult to notice her underlying graciousness. This is especially true for Hillary in today's media environment. The strongest evidence for her graciousness is that she never projects hate. I would also say that her graciousness is a graciousness of action, not words. Look at her support for Sam Corbyn's jobs bill, which is a good bill, despite the fact that it may have a net benefit for Republican politicians. But I am also impressed by stories like the one recently written by a prominent evangelical Christian (and published in the Times) reporting her popularity among evangelicals outside the United States. I would imagine that they have a better perspective on her graciousness than many in this country do.
If someone is constantly confronted by situations that require a tough response, it may be difficult to notice her underlying graciousness. This is especially true for Hillary in today's media environment. The strongest evidence for her graciousness is that she never projects hate. I would also say that her graciousness is a graciousness of action, not words. Look at her support for Sam Corbyn's jobs bill, which is a good bill, despite the fact that it may have a net benefit for Republican politicians. But I am also impressed by stories like the one recently written by a prominent evangelical Christian (and published in the Times) reporting her popularity among evangelicals outside the United States. I would imagine that they have a better perspective on her graciousness than many in this country do.
232
I have a hard time understanding why Mrs. Clinton is as unpopular as she apparently is.
I see her as espousing policies similar to ones that JohnmKennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan would have adopted as their own were they living in the present day. And as a candidate for President whose qualifications for the office fall well within
the range of normal requirements for the office.
Mrs. Clinton’s emails are completely irrelevant to me. I doubt that they contained a single secret any of our enemies felt were worth knowing.
Bill Gates had money of his own to give away. The Clintons had to raise theirs. From what I can tell, their Foundation has done good things. If that has involved
cutting a few corners here or there or doing favors for some unsavory characters, I can live with it. The Clintons aren’t perfect, and neither am I.
Which is only to say that while Mrs. Clinton might not be a perfect President, it seems quite evident she would be far from the worst, which is exactly what Mr. Trump promises to be.
I see her as espousing policies similar to ones that JohnmKennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Franklin Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan would have adopted as their own were they living in the present day. And as a candidate for President whose qualifications for the office fall well within
the range of normal requirements for the office.
Mrs. Clinton’s emails are completely irrelevant to me. I doubt that they contained a single secret any of our enemies felt were worth knowing.
Bill Gates had money of his own to give away. The Clintons had to raise theirs. From what I can tell, their Foundation has done good things. If that has involved
cutting a few corners here or there or doing favors for some unsavory characters, I can live with it. The Clintons aren’t perfect, and neither am I.
Which is only to say that while Mrs. Clinton might not be a perfect President, it seems quite evident she would be far from the worst, which is exactly what Mr. Trump promises to be.
10
Given all the lies, insinuations, half-truths, insults, and old-fashioned misogyny she has suffered for the last 20+ years, I think it takes a mountain of grace to just get up every morning, to say nothing of trying to make the world better, despite it all.
15
Can we please stop obsessing about Clinton's "private email server" as if the server itself were important, rather than that she used her personal email account to conduct government business.
Everyone needs email. Some of us use our company email for personal correspondence, some use public services such as Gmail. However, when you're the Secretary of State, you can't use your government account, for several reasons. One, it's illegal, two, every email you send becomes the property of the US government, subject to FOI requests, where every email you send eventually becomes public. Similarly, the SoT really can't use Gmail, as even Google says there is no legal expectation of privacy using a public server. HRC would have no standing to object to someone suing to search all her email. So, should Hillary want to send a quick note to Bill saying "Putin's such a dip-wad" should she do so using Gmail, there's no expectation of privacy. Using a private server was a rational decision.
The issue is using a personal email account to conduct state business, not who hosted the email server.
Now, let's see who else in the Federal Government may have, on occasion, conducted state business using their personal email account.
Everyone needs email. Some of us use our company email for personal correspondence, some use public services such as Gmail. However, when you're the Secretary of State, you can't use your government account, for several reasons. One, it's illegal, two, every email you send becomes the property of the US government, subject to FOI requests, where every email you send eventually becomes public. Similarly, the SoT really can't use Gmail, as even Google says there is no legal expectation of privacy using a public server. HRC would have no standing to object to someone suing to search all her email. So, should Hillary want to send a quick note to Bill saying "Putin's such a dip-wad" should she do so using Gmail, there's no expectation of privacy. Using a private server was a rational decision.
The issue is using a personal email account to conduct state business, not who hosted the email server.
Now, let's see who else in the Federal Government may have, on occasion, conducted state business using their personal email account.
5
I think t his is a very insightful speech, but I would take it with a grain of salt. Perhaps HRC does small venues with real people because that is where she CAN show her humanity rather than in large venues with scripted speeches. I remember an acquaintance telling me back in 2007 that he had met HRC briefly in a nearby town, then went to see her again in another town. She remembered his name!
On the other hand, I do think she should do more news conferences. With the Benghazi hearings and the debates, she has shown quite decisively that she can think on her feet, so there really should be no reason not to have such conferences.
Finally, I acknowledge that HRC is not by any means an ideal candidate; she has flaws, but I do think they are definitely outweighed by her merits. She has been hounded by attacks for decades, and everything that is questioned becomes a giant scandal, even when she behaved correctly. She knows her facts, she has serious government experience, and she has the drive to succeed. The past eight years have shown that fairly modest Democratic strategies have worked to move the country back to health and greatness. I believe that staggering course changes now would disrupt the nation's gains and place more Americans at risk.
On the other hand, I do think she should do more news conferences. With the Benghazi hearings and the debates, she has shown quite decisively that she can think on her feet, so there really should be no reason not to have such conferences.
Finally, I acknowledge that HRC is not by any means an ideal candidate; she has flaws, but I do think they are definitely outweighed by her merits. She has been hounded by attacks for decades, and everything that is questioned becomes a giant scandal, even when she behaved correctly. She knows her facts, she has serious government experience, and she has the drive to succeed. The past eight years have shown that fairly modest Democratic strategies have worked to move the country back to health and greatness. I believe that staggering course changes now would disrupt the nation's gains and place more Americans at risk.
6
"Her posture is still brittle, stonewalling and dissembling. Clinton scandals are all the same. There’s an act of unseemly but not felonious behavior, then the futile drawn-out withholding of information, and forever after the unwillingness to ever come clean." Alleged scandals please. Republicans have worked very hard at creating a record, however tenuously attached to reality, that they now cite as proof of "something". Mr. Brooks needs to separate the innuendo and rumor from fact and evidence. And Mr. Brooks needs to look into his own mind and heart to see how much propaganda has infected his opinion of Ms. Clinton.
22
A pity Brooks doesn't read comments posted here,
he might change his mind, perhaps that's his fear
he might change his mind, perhaps that's his fear
14
America is desperate for a little uplift, it's true. This is why overflow crowds filled footballs stadiums in every city Bernie Sanders visited during his campaign, a campaign squashed by both the Democratic Party and the press.
3
This describes President Obama: "If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. You’ll be willing to relinquish control..." However, unlike what Mr. Brooks predicts, this attitude did not have him "gain more strength" among Republicans. So I question the rationale for this article.
14
Who of our recent Presidents governed with grace? President Carter? He was judged to be weak and now to be humble and wise by the public. President Reagan? While a Cold War warrior with a warm smile he admitted he did not watch the "Candy Store" well and so the Iran-Contra scandal was allowed to happen. President Bush Sr.? Public judged him weak because he did not counter Iraq's invasion of Kuwait quick enough and untrustworthy because he raised taxes after pledging not to do so. President Obama? His gracious leadership is welcomed by admirers and reviled by detractors. Gracious leadership, like any leadership, requires followers committed to helping the leader lead. We are in a time when many who are in positions to follow, don't! They just want to blow things up; e.g. healthcare, freedom of assembly, and harassing others' about their citizenship. The art of gracious leadership needs the craft of responsible citizenship by all.
15
Good piece. Reminds me of why I read your stuff when I generally disagree. I started to say that we're faced with a dilemma, but we aren't; we don't have any choice come election day. Secretary Clinton. What can I say. The women who were pioneering when I started law school were people whose tenacity I admired and still do. But .... and anything I say that starts with a but brings me down. So many people responding here discount Clinton's flaws to the point of ignoring them and come off as people with whom I couldn't possibly have a rational conversation. Secretary Clinton is not a martyr, but you'd think otherwise reading her followers' remarks.
2
It is becoming rather tiresome to read Mr. Brooks's creative attempts to find fault with Hillary Clinton. And they all seem to be matters of style rather than of substance. I for one don't need Mrs. Clinton to be gracious when she become president. I want her to intimidate the Republican opposition in Congress. I want her to advance her agenda. I want her to continue winning the respect she gained from foreign leaders when she was secretary of state. If anyone needs to show some grace when Mrs. Clinton becomes president, it is Donald Trump and all the cowardly Republican leaders who stood beside him throughout his despicable campaign.
32
What a perfect response. Excellent
4
There is no email scandal.
"...a whiff of inhumanity about her campaign that inspires distrust."
And the decades old Hillary beat-down is continued by sophomoric statements such as this. Nothing ever concrete, no there there, just continuous over the back yard fence gossip and innuendo.
"...a whiff of inhumanity about her campaign that inspires distrust."
And the decades old Hillary beat-down is continued by sophomoric statements such as this. Nothing ever concrete, no there there, just continuous over the back yard fence gossip and innuendo.
14
The most obvious example of a leader with graciousness, in current times, is President Carter.
Yes, many may consider him as weak while in office, but a gracious leader leads by example and the examples he has shown cannot be matched by any other "leader" I can think of over the past 50 years.
Yes, many may consider him as weak while in office, but a gracious leader leads by example and the examples he has shown cannot be matched by any other "leader" I can think of over the past 50 years.
10
Yes, but first she has to win the election. Situations determine political strategy. Right now Hillary is in a situation where her opponent is trying to foment hatred against her. Her speech yesterday was very good because she took her time and didn't yell. Her opponent is putting pressure on himself by insinuating that Clinton has suffered some brain damage. I had forgotten how smart she is and what good recall she has. She'll clearly show in the debates that it's not her brain that is damaged. trump is going to look like the loser he is. That'll have to be good enough for now. If Clinton wins, the situation will change again and she'll have to change with it. It's not very complicated.
4
This was a lovely article - I was struck to read the number of 'intellectual' and defensive responses!!!!!
This campaign year has evidenced a hunger of so many for truly wise leadership and authentic responses that have been so rare and which are David Brooks' point.
This campaign year has evidenced a hunger of so many for truly wise leadership and authentic responses that have been so rare and which are David Brooks' point.
1
For how much longer are we going to have to put up with David Brooks's insipid "reflections", where he boils "big questions" that have recently occurred to him down to a few paragraphs of generalized and simplistic observations. I have to admit that I only read his column to enjoy the scornful comments they usually inspire from the majority of his readers. But that enjoyment is tempered by the anger I feel at the space he is provided by the NY Times to spout wishy-washy platitudes that try to reconcile his obvious decency as a human being with a sentimentalized attachment to long extinct Republican "values".
15
It's one thing to expect graciousness from a candidate but the reality is that this campaign is ugly, offensive, and lacking in grace. As a person I find Hillary very gracious and tough. Few people in public life have been scrutinized as closely, under almost constant attack for mostly minor things. Some people would become brittle in responses and bitter in manner. She does not strike me that way. To have the minutiae blown up as 'the sky is falling' by the various heroes of the right over several decades now can get tiresome and one has to find a way to respond carefully without making it a bigger molehill.
The one thing Trump will never be is gracious. He doesn't have that gene unless he's running a game on someone and then it just smacks of schoolyard bully. That's one of the many reasons his temperament for the job is very questionable.
I want competence and knowledge from my candidate. I want to feel that things are being considered from the point of view of experience.
This campaign is tiring. The stuff flying around doesn't serve much purpose. The total lack of a core belief from Trump makes Hillary even more appealing. Yes, mistakes have been made by Hillary. In life we make judgments we later wish we hadn't but it didn't start a war. To argue she's a bigot is ridiculous and childish. She's tough and she's strong and she has a public record of accomplishment no matter what the right says. That's enough for me.
The one thing Trump will never be is gracious. He doesn't have that gene unless he's running a game on someone and then it just smacks of schoolyard bully. That's one of the many reasons his temperament for the job is very questionable.
I want competence and knowledge from my candidate. I want to feel that things are being considered from the point of view of experience.
This campaign is tiring. The stuff flying around doesn't serve much purpose. The total lack of a core belief from Trump makes Hillary even more appealing. Yes, mistakes have been made by Hillary. In life we make judgments we later wish we hadn't but it didn't start a war. To argue she's a bigot is ridiculous and childish. She's tough and she's strong and she has a public record of accomplishment no matter what the right says. That's enough for me.
12
Barack Obama: amazing grace, in every sense of the phrase.
23
Goodnessgracioussakesalive, David - wake up! There is NO email scandal - none. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent trying to prove there is one, but there isn't. Please stop repeating this nonsense and contributing to the sleaze-filled smog of absurdly overdone micro-analysis of all things insubstantial.
21
We don't have a choice between two candidates which substantially reflect the characteristics of the ideal political leader in The Republic. There is a time and place for engaging in political philosophy, but not when the philosophical foundation of the "American Project" is being shaken.
No political system is endowed with immortality, and often the forces that cause the disintegration of a political system are not widely perceived or understood until historians shed their light.
But in 2016, in America, the existential corrosives offered by one candidate are in full view.
No political system is endowed with immortality, and often the forces that cause the disintegration of a political system are not widely perceived or understood until historians shed their light.
But in 2016, in America, the existential corrosives offered by one candidate are in full view.
5
I wonder if David Brooks is familiar with the concept of Multipliers by Liz Wiseman. It encourages more collaboration. I think that Hillary Clinton needs to work on this, to become more humble and gracious.
Here is a 2min video on the Multipliers book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctRoJaHu0z0
www.MultipliersBook.com
The idea is that people who are Multipliers encourage more teamwork and collaboration, while Diminishers discourage this. Clinton can be a Multiplier, while Trump is clearly a Diminister.
Here is a 2min video on the Multipliers book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctRoJaHu0z0
www.MultipliersBook.com
The idea is that people who are Multipliers encourage more teamwork and collaboration, while Diminishers discourage this. Clinton can be a Multiplier, while Trump is clearly a Diminister.
1
Yes Hillary needs to become humble. Shall she put on sack cloth and wail in the streets?
6
I met Hillary Clinton in the McGovern campaign in 1972. In a 2 hour session she smartly organized our fledgling group of campaigners. She showed both steel and empathy. Forty-two years later, what has she learned? How has experience shaped her heart and mind? I think she still shows steel and empathy and, in fact, much more of each of those attributes so necessary for conducting a campaign. Does she show more humility? That is the issue raised by David Brooks. We all remember her New Hampshire moment in 2012 when she humbly admitted that she at times feels beaten down by the intensity of her fight. My guess is that deep in her heart she runs according to such feelings of vulnerability guarded by secrecy. She has been bitten too many times to act incautiously as David would suggest. She operates existentially rather than magnanimously. She is in the ring fighting for the life of her principles. She is more Patton than Eisenhower.
16
Yes, al you say is true...and hopeful. But, remember, to most of us the world is no longer 'a friendly and hopeful place.' The constant corruption, the government's inability to function, the tunnel-vision of our so-called, elected officials undermines hope and, certainly, a 'friendly' view of anything. Why, it's difficult now even to be acquainted with our neighbors. Come on, Mr. Brooks. The country has changed dramatically...and not for the better.
I'm for Hillary; her mistakes have been decried, repeated, examined, repeated again and again. To what purpose? ... for someone's political expediency. My question to all of you is: why would she run; why would anyone want to be president? God bless her.
I'm for Hillary; her mistakes have been decried, repeated, examined, repeated again and again. To what purpose? ... for someone's political expediency. My question to all of you is: why would she run; why would anyone want to be president? God bless her.
8
My guess is that both Brooks and Douthat know how bad their party is but they also have to make a living writing columns every week and so this is what we get.
16
I think Hillary will be this type of gracious leader if elected. Now, however, she is in paranoid battle stance. Tenuous, flimsy, unsubstantiated judgement is coming at her from every angle. What's needed now is not grace and humility, but tenacity, intelligence, wit, timing, sense of humor and style. That wins elections. She can't bend to Trumps wild claims, or forgive the alt-right misogyny and racism. No, this is stare down time, confrontation time, humiliate the stupid opposition time.
14
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. "
Seriously Mr Brooks. After the party you schill for has done everything possible to divide people through blatant racism against the President and his family, fought to maintain the wealth and privilege of the ultr-wealthy and spent decades on endless attacks on the Clintons. Seriously Mr Brook?
Seriously Mr Brooks. After the party you schill for has done everything possible to divide people through blatant racism against the President and his family, fought to maintain the wealth and privilege of the ultr-wealthy and spent decades on endless attacks on the Clintons. Seriously Mr Brook?
17
Mr. Brooks, you need not forage through the dust bins of history for examples of grace. Our current president has shown it again and again. Many people will not realize it until he is gone, but it is there. Simply put, where are the Obama scandals? We've become so inured to scandalous behavior that we fail to notice its absence.
14
Just this morning a friend reminded me that you can't teach old dogs new tricks. David thinks the old dog can be taught a new trick. Last week David surmised that a careerist could somehow be transformed into a vocationist.
Rollo May described a patient with "a crystallized personality structure". That fits old dogs and careerists.
David, that old dog and that careerist are set in their ways. What they are now is what they will be. Unfortunately, the careerist is going to be the next POTUS of the United States. Tricks and all.
Rollo May described a patient with "a crystallized personality structure". That fits old dogs and careerists.
David, that old dog and that careerist are set in their ways. What they are now is what they will be. Unfortunately, the careerist is going to be the next POTUS of the United States. Tricks and all.
No mention of Hilary's experience with the right wing media. I have neighbors who still believe the Clinton's had Vince Foster murdered.
It is a long list.
And some of the most recent ones, Hillary health problems?
How about some accountability and responsibility from the party of accountability and responsibility?
It is a long list.
And some of the most recent ones, Hillary health problems?
How about some accountability and responsibility from the party of accountability and responsibility?
14
Mr. Brooks, if you had sustained over 30 years of relentless attacks by the right wing including years-long and fruitless Congressional investigations (e.g., Whitewater, Benghazi), would you be as open, forthcoming and gracious as you expect Clinton to be? Geez man, it's been a battlefield and one that few others, I'd wager, could withstand as well as she has.
One of the reasons I'll vote for Clinton in November is because she's been battle-tested again and again and she still thrives. She is one ole broad who never gives up, who will fight to the end for what she believes. Scars or not, that's what I want in the presidency because that's what our present political and international environment demands.
One of the reasons I'll vote for Clinton in November is because she's been battle-tested again and again and she still thrives. She is one ole broad who never gives up, who will fight to the end for what she believes. Scars or not, that's what I want in the presidency because that's what our present political and international environment demands.
16
What, exactly, is it that Mrs. Clinton has not "come clean" about? She turned over her emails, she provided her server, she answered questions from the FBI, she has explained what prompted her to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, and she pretty clearly did not do anything illegal.
Secretary Clinton has also said that she regrets the decision she made to use a private server. She has indicated that she understands how that action might well be seen, is seen by some, as a lapse of judgment. I think that she has even apologized!
The proposal you make, Mr. Brooks, applies equally well to Secretary Clinton's political opponents. They, too, should consider how best to "uplift" us. We won't get that boost with this never-ending, two decade-plus, malicious, fact-free assault on the Democratic presidential candidate's character and life.
Secretary Clinton has also said that she regrets the decision she made to use a private server. She has indicated that she understands how that action might well be seen, is seen by some, as a lapse of judgment. I think that she has even apologized!
The proposal you make, Mr. Brooks, applies equally well to Secretary Clinton's political opponents. They, too, should consider how best to "uplift" us. We won't get that boost with this never-ending, two decade-plus, malicious, fact-free assault on the Democratic presidential candidate's character and life.
6
I believe it was Hemingway who defined courage as "grace under pressure." Hillary Clinton has endured decades of spiteful, baseless attacks that would have caused lesser persons to wilt. And in the face of it all she still gets out of bed in the morning and carries on--the epitome of what my mother referred to "keeping on keeping on" in the face of adversity. Grace? Courage? She has it in spades.
15
Many, many people comment on how warm and personable she is in person. Yet when she's in a public setting, she is reflexively defensive -- or coldly evasive. It's clear what an intelligent and thoughtful person she is (despite some of my policy disagreements). If she could relax into her personal self in her public role, she'd be an infinitely more attractive candidate. Thanks much for your insights. They're right on point.
1
Considering all that has been thrown at her, Hillary Clinton is amazingly gracious and kind, I think.
15
I was born when Franklin Roosevelt was in the White House. In all this time, the only president who was humble and honest was Jimmy Carter. And look where it got him.
12
Wow. I just don't see any human being, after being despised by an entire political party for 3 decades +, being accused of everything from murder to espionage to being a weak spouse ... just not sure how any human being would be less guarded and more magnanimous than the highly-qualified, first female POTUS, Hillary R Clinton.
19
Boy, this really chafes to read. She lacks grace? Are you kidding me? A woman who has withstood the most asinine slew of baseless attacks over the last 25 years with her head held high? That is more than enough "grace" for me, particularly since last I heard such a ridiculous quality was not an established requirement for the presidency. Nobody would ever say such a silly thing about a man.
26
Hillary's impulsive response to hostility towards her for being President Clinton's wife and decades of malicious innuendo dragged up out of any potential scandal that adversaries can present concerning her is to withdraw from the whole experience, but to be a strong Presidential candidate she has to accept those blows to her self esteem as just part of a very nasty competition for power, and to let it be. It's a bit late in the game to learn how to do that, but that is her Achilles heel, it's what makes her seem dishonest when all she is trying to do is dodge the unpleasantness.
5
"Hillary Clinton has experience, but does not seem to have been transformed by it."
So much for thinking you have been transformed.
So much for thinking you have been transformed.
12
David, you are basically saying that Hillary has learned virtually nothing from her experiences. I just read a lengthy article about how much she learned from her health care involvement over twenty years ago. "never too late to learn from experience" - how condescending (and false)
11
There's more than a whiff of Mr. Brook's nostalgia here but I am going to give him a pass on that. This is not an election in the 1950s and Sec. Clinton is not June Cleaver. It's all well and good to talk about grace and being gracious, but I would bet that most voters are not looking for those qualities. Strength, intelligence, temperament and honesty probably top the list. So when it comes to honesty and if we are all being fair and honest ourselves, do we hold Sec. Clinton up to a higher standard? How many of us have cut corners or broken the law on some level? Fudging tax returns a bit, running a stop sign, not speaking up when the cashier at the supermarket makes a mistake in our favor? Granted, those might not be on the same level as the things Sec. Clinton has been accused of and investigated for over and over. Personally, give me the candidate who has been raked over the coals time and time again, laid bare in the press, scrutinized and grilled. Has Sec. Clinton been messy and opaque during her years in Washington? Yes. But she is not in prison and, unlike her opponent, she is increasingly direct, consistent and open. No, she is not a perfect candidate -- who is? -- but she will have my vote (after much soul-searching) not just because the alternative is so dangerous and odious but because I believe she passes the test of being able to stand up to pressure, remains steadfast and commands great knowledge.
7
There are many great attributes to Gandhi but gracious leader was not one of them
2
Inhumanity? Wow, this from the guy who supported for eight years the Bush-Cheney gang that set the middle East on fire and killed or maimed thousand of young Americans! Inhumanity? Take some responsibility, sir.
16
Great Mr Brooks. You have about 4 months left in which you should be arguing everyday that President Obama should not be treated as a lame duck, but as the last glimpse of gracious leadership we are likely to see for a long time.
You have 4 months left to tell your Republican friends in Congress that they should cooperate with President Obama and stop breeding the small minded and fact free vindictive obstructionism that has been their calling card since 2008
You are right about Hillary Clinton's major flaw, and it is significant. So too is the flaw of the Replublican Congressional majority.
Judge Garland is the litmus test. Confiirm him now as a sign of trust. Stonewalling Judge Garland's nomination to the Supreme Court has all the hallmarks of destructive fragility and tendaciousness that you criticize in Hillary Clinton.
In one case it is a problem of one person's flawed personality.
In the other case, it is the entire institution of a whole political party.
Which is the greater danger? Which is more likely to prevent the return of graciousness to leadership after we lose President Obama's model of decorum?
You have 4 months left to tell your Republican friends in Congress that they should cooperate with President Obama and stop breeding the small minded and fact free vindictive obstructionism that has been their calling card since 2008
You are right about Hillary Clinton's major flaw, and it is significant. So too is the flaw of the Replublican Congressional majority.
Judge Garland is the litmus test. Confiirm him now as a sign of trust. Stonewalling Judge Garland's nomination to the Supreme Court has all the hallmarks of destructive fragility and tendaciousness that you criticize in Hillary Clinton.
In one case it is a problem of one person's flawed personality.
In the other case, it is the entire institution of a whole political party.
Which is the greater danger? Which is more likely to prevent the return of graciousness to leadership after we lose President Obama's model of decorum?
14
As the saying goes,some people live and learn, others live and live. If you, David, are just now arriving at the conclusion that Hillary Clinton is insufficiently sensitive to public perceptions about her, you might have a point. On the other hand, look at who she is running against. Donald Trump's sole claim to profiting from his own experience has been to manipulate news media because he understands that the default position for celebrity news coverage is that nobody really cares whether the narrative Trump is peddling stands up to scrutiny. Until recently, favorable coverage was Trump's for the asking because of the shallow and glitzy way in which Trump presents himself.
Hillary Clinton's problem is the opposite of Trump. No glitz, no glamour; instead, she has years of substantive accomplishments, where experience really counts. Hillary Clinton stands head and shoulders above anyone the Republican Party could have nominated for the office of president.
Hillary Clinton's problem is the opposite of Trump. No glitz, no glamour; instead, she has years of substantive accomplishments, where experience really counts. Hillary Clinton stands head and shoulders above anyone the Republican Party could have nominated for the office of president.
23
It is undeniable that there is a huge percentage of Americans who do not trust her. She always has that aura of entitlement, e.g. carpetbagging to New York to grab the Senate seat, then Sec of State as a consolation prize for losing to Obama. Mishandling of classified material is a serious matter and being dismissive about it ("oh sorry") doesn'e help her cause. I am a retired military officer and I can tell you that she got a pass. Any military officer would have lost their career at best. Both candidates could display more humility to connect with the middle class. It's not a sexist thing. She seems to be so focused on being a strong Margaret Thatcher type that she is being perceived exactly as that by a great percentage of the voting public...cold, dismissive, and arrogant.
4
Just like the majority if officers in the military.
2
Hmmm...taking questions about Benghazi for seven-plus hours and not losing her composure was grace under pressure. Apologizing for using a home email sever for the umpteenth time is gracious. Being called "crooked," "lying," and now a "bigot," staying calm through all the labels thrown at her, and even using humor about them, to me is the definition of grace.
So, who are you going to vote for David, the one who already knows grace, and demonstrates it daily, or the one who has never been gracious a day in his life?
So, who are you going to vote for David, the one who already knows grace, and demonstrates it daily, or the one who has never been gracious a day in his life?
26
I am certain that Hillary will be gracious to all of her subjects.
2
As long as they know their place.
Mr. Brooks, I never know how to feel about you. You keep confusing me with your moments of clarity and insight, which are sandwiched between your long periods of boring, not-so-thinly-veiled patronizing sexism. Maybe I still haven't quite gotten over your advice to Michelle Obama vis-a-vis her fit upper arms, when you said "She's made her point. Now she should put away Thunder and Lightning." (Because if you're a woman, it's only okay to go sleeveless if it looks like you might need help with your suitcase.) But seriously? In this year's presidential race, you're indicting Hillary Clinton for a lack of graciousness??? (Hold on, I have to go laugh for a few seconds...almost done...no, wait, I'm laughing again, because I just imagined Donald Trump "understanding the accuracy of John Keat's observation that 'Nothing ever becomes real 'til it is experienced.'" Hahahahahaha!!!!)
I gotta hand it to you (and don't worry, I'm wearing long sleeves), sexism is rarely funny, but somehow, you managed to make it so.
I gotta hand it to you (and don't worry, I'm wearing long sleeves), sexism is rarely funny, but somehow, you managed to make it so.
38
David Brooks is mysogynistic.
7
Dorothy Day? With Abe and Gandhi. Please!
4
I've read David Brooks and Maureen Dowd for years and they've both gone off the rails at the same time. Mr. Brooks has always been a sermonizer trying to advance his beliefs by wrapping them up in simple moral and ethical tenets. He spends most of his columns spinning an ideal w/o mentioning names or events and then, when he thinks you've bought into his fairy tale, he calls out some Democrat as the villain of his story. Irrelevant and self-serving. You're running a business and most of your current readers will be dead soon. Can anyone imagine millennials reading this drivel?
12
My Heavens! Is "graciousness" the new push back against smart, strong, successful women? Mr. Brooks, I know you are trying to live the godly life (oops! gracious life), but could you please move onto something else? You are a closet sexist and it shows in this election. That does you a disservice. So why don't you work on your sexism? And I can assure you, in particular, that Hillary is far more gracious than Havel (if he's your standard). I'd rather see you write the dishonesty of the GOP in trying to foist off a crazy man on the American public, believing they, the GOP, can control him like a puppet from behind the scenes. Let's forget about graciousness until that kind of trying to pull the wool over all our eyes is over with.
20
Let's face it, the only way HRC would be gracious enough for Mr. Brooks is if she went home, tied on an apron and made a cherry pie for him while he and his buddies smoked cigars and talked "man-stuff".
The entertainment value of Mr. Brooks living in a genteel era where everyone understood their place is wearing very thin with me. He is getting dangerously close to being dumped on the heap right behind Maureen Dowd, whom I no longer even bother to read.
The entertainment value of Mr. Brooks living in a genteel era where everyone understood their place is wearing very thin with me. He is getting dangerously close to being dumped on the heap right behind Maureen Dowd, whom I no longer even bother to read.
21
David Brooks seems to be mining the fertile ground of eighteenth-century stereotypes for the sexist dog whistle du jour. The demand that Hillary display the feminine virtues of "graciousness," "gentle strength" and willingness to "surrender control" is disgusting, and not even that subtle. It's just another way of making the tired old accusation of abrasiveness against powerful women. "You've forgotten your place. You're uppity. Stop trying to act like a man."
It seems that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
It seems that the more things change, the more they stay the same.
24
Mr. Brooks, do you ever actually hear what Hillary Clinton says? She talks candidly about gratitude, her humble middle class roots and lifting people up so they can experience better lives. And just the other day on CNN she said again that she was wrong to use private email, took responsibility and apologized.
The truth is that if Clinton sounds defensive it's because she is put on the defensive all the time. I think that You miss the graciousness in Hillary's strength and wherewithal to stay in politics and public service despite withering attacks, which many are unjustified or at least overplayed. Certainly the most gracious person running for president right now is Hillary Clinton. Next time really listen to what she says and you may be surprised.
The truth is that if Clinton sounds defensive it's because she is put on the defensive all the time. I think that You miss the graciousness in Hillary's strength and wherewithal to stay in politics and public service despite withering attacks, which many are unjustified or at least overplayed. Certainly the most gracious person running for president right now is Hillary Clinton. Next time really listen to what she says and you may be surprised.
19
Graciousness is costly in the arena of politics. While not a big fan of President Obama, I believe he embodies the qualities of grace and humility. Those traits are not admired nor valued in the U.S. Congress, by Republicans nor Democrats. What does seem to work is an iron fist and a willingness to take on all comers. Odd how politicians say they strive to instill values their their children, but reject those values for themselves.
4
If only Hillary would be gracious, and apologize whenever there was a hint of her doing something wrong, the voters would forgive her, and she could truly lead all of America. Really David? Hillary could apologize on her knees until the cows came home, and the large chunk of voters, ginned up by Trump and the Fox News smear machine, would call for her execution instead of her forgiveness. Hillary is a tad on the paranoid side; 40 years of people doing everything they can to destroy you tends to encourage that.
15
Mr. Brooks wants Hillary to be Queen Elizabeth II who doesn't have to fight tooth and nail to keep her sanity, her job, her principles and her beliefs. The politician in her knows that it is always a survival of the fittest, where every adversary is always slithering from under stinky rocks to bite her behind.
Do we want a president or a constitutional monarch who remains above the fray, or a president who will fight for what she believes are what is best for America and for the world? Didn't America abjure the role of a gracious king or queen to become a democracy where everybody has a chance to negotiate a slippery totem pole to reach the top?
Do we want a president or a constitutional monarch who remains above the fray, or a president who will fight for what she believes are what is best for America and for the world? Didn't America abjure the role of a gracious king or queen to become a democracy where everybody has a chance to negotiate a slippery totem pole to reach the top?
5
David Brooks attributes the responses of Hillary Clinton about the email issue to a lack of humility or graciousness. Her responses are neither.
The one mistake Mrs. Clinton commits is to rely upon her area of expertise and comfort.
She recognizes that the email issue, in part, is one more episode in a 25-year attack on her and her privacy by the right. Therefore, instead of simply saying that she exercised poor judgment by using a private email server and is sorry (both of which she has done repeatedly), Hillary Clinton responds like a lawyer, refuting the details of alleged security breaches.
It is an error to assume that Hillary Clinton has not learned from her mistakes. It makes her sound unfairly like Donald Trump, whose mental impairment precludes his even recognizing his mistakes.
The one mistake Mrs. Clinton commits is to rely upon her area of expertise and comfort.
She recognizes that the email issue, in part, is one more episode in a 25-year attack on her and her privacy by the right. Therefore, instead of simply saying that she exercised poor judgment by using a private email server and is sorry (both of which she has done repeatedly), Hillary Clinton responds like a lawyer, refuting the details of alleged security breaches.
It is an error to assume that Hillary Clinton has not learned from her mistakes. It makes her sound unfairly like Donald Trump, whose mental impairment precludes his even recognizing his mistakes.
7
David sometimes your moralizing inspires me and sometimes not so much. there is too much criticism of Secretary Clinton for being too insular or too withholding. Every time the Republicans learn anything about the Clintons, anything at all, they go on an ad nauseum witch hunt. To wit Whitewater and the endless inquiry that came to nothing. As a woman she is a particularly vulnerable target for the siege that Republicans have her under. Her defensiveness is the rational adaptation to this siege.
8
Gracious: Courteous, kind, and pleasant.
You want a leader that is this? I don't.
You want a leader that is this? I don't.
1
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside."
Mr. Brooks, you cannot possibly be this naive, can you? Mrs. Clinton's enemies (yes that's the right word - they have been trying to destroy her for decades) will use anything, real or imagined, to take her down. The idea that if she only had a better response to her mistakes that people would "come alongside" is laughable. Yes, I'm sure if she came out with a serious mea culpa, Mr. Trump's response, aided by Mr. Bannon and Mr. Ailes, would be "fair and balanced".
Yes, Hillary Clinton gets to decide what sort of leader she wants to be - after the election. Until then, this is a street fight and she knows it.
Mr. Brooks, you cannot possibly be this naive, can you? Mrs. Clinton's enemies (yes that's the right word - they have been trying to destroy her for decades) will use anything, real or imagined, to take her down. The idea that if she only had a better response to her mistakes that people would "come alongside" is laughable. Yes, I'm sure if she came out with a serious mea culpa, Mr. Trump's response, aided by Mr. Bannon and Mr. Ailes, would be "fair and balanced".
Yes, Hillary Clinton gets to decide what sort of leader she wants to be - after the election. Until then, this is a street fight and she knows it.
22
Hillary Clinton has been on the receiving end of a ridiculous amount of vitriol for 25 years. It has nothing to do with her. Result: (1) she is excessively defensive (as Brooks point out); (2) some people tune out any criticism of her, even when warranted; (3) other people believe anything bad that is said about her, no matter how absurd. It's not going to change.
4
I am a progressive, but I think your points here are good. Hillary Clinton may be one of Trump's worst legacies.
1
Mr. Brooks, you are a Republican know-nothing, which is why I refuse to listen to you on NPR, Friday evenings. You're so clueless. How did you get that job?
4
There was no talk of "gracious leadership "during the horrific Cheney-Bush Wach presidency!
Give a girl a break! We know when to be gracious,not in the middle of an election. Graciousness in this context is clearly sexist.
Give a girl a break! We know when to be gracious,not in the middle of an election. Graciousness in this context is clearly sexist.
11
Mr. Brooks, Mrs. Clinton has been under attack for the past 3 decades. So if she thinks her professional life is a battlefield, perhaps she's right. She has little reason to suppose anything else. So we're to expect her to smile and act "gracious" as the GOP attack dogs, the snide right-wing media and the others in the vast right-wing conspiracy circle and snarl? To these mouthbreathers graciousness is a sign of weakness. BTW, I noticed you didn't mention Margaret Thatcher or any other politician, for that matter.
I once read somewhere that being a columnist is like descending from the hills after the battle to shoot the wounded. But, no doubt, graciously.
I once read somewhere that being a columnist is like descending from the hills after the battle to shoot the wounded. But, no doubt, graciously.
6
I'm sorry, how is Hillary Clinton ungracious, exactly? How has her life not humbled her?
Let's look at the facts:
* She managed a public rapprochement with Bernie Sanders after a very hotly contested Primary; She was on the other end of a similar rapprochement in 2008. How is this not gracious?
* She debuted in national politics as the architect of a complex and very progressive health care plan. She lost. By all accounts she learned from this experience and embraced incrementalism. How is this not humbling?
Let's stop viewing Clinton entirely through the distorted prism of the "email scandal". Yes, it was not a good decision. But we need to judge her by the thousands of decisions she has made in her long career, not just one highly visible one. You are a student of cognitive psychology, David. It's time to ditch the "proximity bias" and look deeper.
Let's look at the facts:
* She managed a public rapprochement with Bernie Sanders after a very hotly contested Primary; She was on the other end of a similar rapprochement in 2008. How is this not gracious?
* She debuted in national politics as the architect of a complex and very progressive health care plan. She lost. By all accounts she learned from this experience and embraced incrementalism. How is this not humbling?
Let's stop viewing Clinton entirely through the distorted prism of the "email scandal". Yes, it was not a good decision. But we need to judge her by the thousands of decisions she has made in her long career, not just one highly visible one. You are a student of cognitive psychology, David. It's time to ditch the "proximity bias" and look deeper.
13
I wonder often how our Founding Fathers would take today's New York Times. JGAIA
David, although I'm not usually a fan, this op-ed speaks to my concerns. I might be able to support her candidacy if she showed just a smidgeon of contrition.
1
Again, Brooks will find reasons not to support the Democrat. Ultimately, he will jump on the Trump train because, despite his pseudo-intellectual patina, he is a small-minded Republican.
6
It is as dangerous to elect some one who sees elected office as a chance to grab everything that's not nailed down as it is to elect an ignoramus. I will vote for neither the Crook or the Buffoon.
If some one wants my vote, they will have to offer a candidate I can actually support!
If some one wants my vote, they will have to offer a candidate I can actually support!
2
Graciousness is always admirable, but in politics it's rarely rewarded. Instead, giving even an inch by way of acceptance of one's mistakes and revealing remorse and understanding of them usually results in a mile of recriminations.
Sadly, "grace under fire" is seen as a sign of weakness, and is almost invariably exploited in the political world. As Harry Truman humorously but ruefully said about Washington D.C.: "If you want a friend in this town, get a dog."
Sadly, "grace under fire" is seen as a sign of weakness, and is almost invariably exploited in the political world. As Harry Truman humorously but ruefully said about Washington D.C.: "If you want a friend in this town, get a dog."
6
We would like for our leaders, whatever their background, to work to bring positive superlatives to the offices we elect them to. It is a given that we do not believe we should treat our own American system of government as an enemy to be felled. We accept that intelligent debate with learned rivals is the way we advance as a people.
Somewhere the contrast has been switched to max. Now - Americans of equal heritage and moral conviction, who disagree on particular topics have to cast each other as mortal enemies. Enemies of God and childhood. Clubbers of seal pups. Evil incarnate. Graciousness doesn't come from experience - it comes from weakness. It comes from a willingness to sell-out one's deeply held convictions for the treacherous ethos of "Political Correctness."
We can see the recording crews at every turn - so we know this is all reality TV. We know there will be a new engaging episode next week.
Surely it all goes away once we turn off the TV and stop reading Internet blogs.
Surely this is all just good fun and when we wake up tomorrow, the sun will rise, and we can watch that funny rich guy spew more vile effluent while we wash down our salty snacks with the foamy beverage of our choice.
Football season is starting again so there's even more conflict to watch.
Why is my old freshman poly-sci teacher back there in the corner crying?
Somewhere the contrast has been switched to max. Now - Americans of equal heritage and moral conviction, who disagree on particular topics have to cast each other as mortal enemies. Enemies of God and childhood. Clubbers of seal pups. Evil incarnate. Graciousness doesn't come from experience - it comes from weakness. It comes from a willingness to sell-out one's deeply held convictions for the treacherous ethos of "Political Correctness."
We can see the recording crews at every turn - so we know this is all reality TV. We know there will be a new engaging episode next week.
Surely it all goes away once we turn off the TV and stop reading Internet blogs.
Surely this is all just good fun and when we wake up tomorrow, the sun will rise, and we can watch that funny rich guy spew more vile effluent while we wash down our salty snacks with the foamy beverage of our choice.
Football season is starting again so there's even more conflict to watch.
Why is my old freshman poly-sci teacher back there in the corner crying?
1
Clinton excels in the art of graciously ignoring calumny for the purpose of focusing on her plans to improve the lot of ordinary Americans.
That's not grace under pressure? Who knew?
That's not grace under pressure? Who knew?
25
We're electing a President not a saint. If Hillary had those traits you ascribe as gracious, she would not be where she is, she would have crumbled long ago. She's been the only girl in the schoolyard and has had to fight and scrap to get one leg up on the boys. Sharp elbows and a sharper tongue along with steely determination and vigor. While she might not be Mother Teresa or even Dorothy Day, she has all the characteristics I want in our President and I'm sure at the end of her tenure she'll qualify to be on your list as one of the most gracious leaders of all time.
18
If Brooks' assertion that grace is at least in part a function of humility, neither Trump nor Clinton possess that characteristic, though Hillary clearly is not the egomaniacal narcissist Trump is. So, eliminating grace as a factor, we are left with competence to be president, and that is a no-brainer. If we base the election on that, Hillary should win in a landslide.
4
Hillary Clinton is breaking new ground. If she is elected in November, she will be the first female to step into this role. It is critically important at this time that her staff, advisors, and the American voters acknowledge that she did not come to this place and time... alone. The vision, hopes and hard work of many, many American women and men opened this opportunity for her. Reviewing her life and her hard work... and she has dedicated herself to public service throughout her entire career... has placed her in the position of breaking down many political barriers. It has not been easy. I am certain at times she has had to overcome great pain and resolve huge trust issues. Change... especially social and political change is never easy. But, she needs to remember that she is not alone. She is walking on a solid foundation built by many courageous and dedicated people who came before her. And... when elected she will be strongly supported by many American women and men who believe in her vision. Her mission? She must speak her mind, share her vision, be courageous and forthright and TRUST in the people who believe in her and support her.
10
I find Hillary as gracious as she needs to be. As for her sharp elbows, I like them too; she needs them in the face of what the Republican party has allowed to happen and she'll need them even more after she wins the election.
20
"No one is raised with a code of stewardship and a sense of personal privilege and duty."
Where do you think we Americans live, Downton Abbey?
Read the Democratic Party platform and see how the Democrats want to improve the lives of the 99%; contrast it with the Republican Party platform. See who is trying to be a good steward for ordinary Americans.
And Mr. Brooks, please stop with your columns based on generalizations that are nothing but ad hominem arguments applied to only one of the two major party candidates.
Where do you think we Americans live, Downton Abbey?
Read the Democratic Party platform and see how the Democrats want to improve the lives of the 99%; contrast it with the Republican Party platform. See who is trying to be a good steward for ordinary Americans.
And Mr. Brooks, please stop with your columns based on generalizations that are nothing but ad hominem arguments applied to only one of the two major party candidates.
9
Stop wasting your time on WWII generals, David. The more appropriate historical comparison is with Dick Nixon. Down and out in 1960..."You won't have me to kick around anymore" shortly thereafter in California...Then back and victorious in 1968...Trickier and more slimy than ever...And did he ever make a great president.
The same, bizarre arc of history we seem to be following with Hillary from 2008's inevitable candidate to today. We have nothing to look forward to except more stonewalling, corruption and disillusionment for the next four years.
The same, bizarre arc of history we seem to be following with Hillary from 2008's inevitable candidate to today. We have nothing to look forward to except more stonewalling, corruption and disillusionment for the next four years.
Graciousness isn't a hallmark of this campaign. We focus so much on the Hillary's emails. Which leaves us no room to see her great moments of grace under fire. We don't expect any grace in speech or action from Donald. It's very sad indeed.
4
David Brooks is making the same mistake now that the right made 20 years ago. There is no email scandal just as their was no Rose Law Firs scandal. It is only when only when the right wing recognizes and admits the con job that is being tried to be run on the American people that I will worry about David Brooks' ideas on graciousness.
9
Oh....I thought from the title that this article would be about the Obamas.
But it's not very gracious towards Mrs Clinton, is it?
But it's not very gracious towards Mrs Clinton, is it?
10
Well, I think this is stunningly true: Today, everybody is in denial about being part of the establishment, believing the actual elite is someone else. Therefore, no one is raised with a code of stewardship and a sense of personal privilege and duty.
Not only do these two statements nail our candidates' inadequacies, it nails ours. And for once, he's right.
Not only do these two statements nail our candidates' inadequacies, it nails ours. And for once, he's right.
1
David, you wrote of important lessons in life for all of us. I am disappointed that you had to then use the lesson as a weapon against Hillary Clinton. People who know her best would, I believe, disagree strongly with you.
4
Oh, David. Sociopaths are exceedingly gracious. It hides a panoply of sins.
7
As I see it, as an outsider, Americans have to choose between 2 evils; neither Trump, nor Clinton will bring the type of leadership Brooks is aspiring for.
1
As an American, I can't take David Brooks remarks seriously. He's a Republican who never has anything nice to say about a Democrat. Barack Obama is very gracious and he's been a good President. Did Brooks hold him up as a role model. No! He's a Democrat. Brooks is suffering from a bad case of buyer's remorse. He's spent his live backing conservative causes and the Republican Party and both have been revealed as frauds.
2
The Rose Law scandal of two decades ago? Two decades ago, Clinton was heading for her second term as first lady. Perhaps Lord Brooks means THREE decades ago?
Ironically, the person he most closely describes in this latest bowl of pap is Barack Obama, whose Presidency he has denigrated either directly, or lliptically, in a continuous barrage of apologias for the Republicant party's attempts to deligitimize Obama's presidency.
Ironically, the person he most closely describes in this latest bowl of pap is Barack Obama, whose Presidency he has denigrated either directly, or lliptically, in a continuous barrage of apologias for the Republicant party's attempts to deligitimize Obama's presidency.
9
David Brooks describes the graciousness of a leader as NOT difficult to be, if he or she really wants to be.
But as the saying goes, "To err is Human," most, or almost all LEADERS are ALSO human. This is actual reality, not idealized reality.
Brooks expects too much out of whom he wants to admire. He gave upon Donald Trump. But he, I feel genuinely wants to admire Hillary Clinton. She has BULGING human flaws. He doesn't like that. Her critics hates her for it. Her friends don't like it but tries to keep quiet or rationalize.
If you are conscious of a very simple fact, 'to err is human' and we ALL are human, some more so than others in their frailty (I felt, this is the essence & uniqueness of Christ's teaching), then we would be a lot less disappointed.
For me, I was quite annoyed by Al Gore's stupidity. I wanted him to win nevertheless. He was more than good enough. But he was what he was, with bulging flaws. So is Hillary Clinton with bulging flaws. She is GOOD ENOUGH, to be our president, far from perfect. That's that.
Figuratively put, don't be greedy. Moderate your desires. If we had kept that principle both Jimmy Carter & George HW Bush would have completed two terms. Bill Clinton wouldn't have been impeached.
On the other side, if we had moderated our tendency to falling in love for charisma, neither Ronald Reagan, nor GW Bush would have been elected. The world would have been much better for it.
But as the saying goes, "To err is Human," most, or almost all LEADERS are ALSO human. This is actual reality, not idealized reality.
Brooks expects too much out of whom he wants to admire. He gave upon Donald Trump. But he, I feel genuinely wants to admire Hillary Clinton. She has BULGING human flaws. He doesn't like that. Her critics hates her for it. Her friends don't like it but tries to keep quiet or rationalize.
If you are conscious of a very simple fact, 'to err is human' and we ALL are human, some more so than others in their frailty (I felt, this is the essence & uniqueness of Christ's teaching), then we would be a lot less disappointed.
For me, I was quite annoyed by Al Gore's stupidity. I wanted him to win nevertheless. He was more than good enough. But he was what he was, with bulging flaws. So is Hillary Clinton with bulging flaws. She is GOOD ENOUGH, to be our president, far from perfect. That's that.
Figuratively put, don't be greedy. Moderate your desires. If we had kept that principle both Jimmy Carter & George HW Bush would have completed two terms. Bill Clinton wouldn't have been impeached.
On the other side, if we had moderated our tendency to falling in love for charisma, neither Ronald Reagan, nor GW Bush would have been elected. The world would have been much better for it.
136
Graciousness? Good grief. Where did it get President Obama?
Sneers from the undereducated boors who make up Congress and the media. I'll take competence, thank you.
She is competent and experienced.
He is neither.
But gracious?
Sneers from the undereducated boors who make up Congress and the media. I'll take competence, thank you.
She is competent and experienced.
He is neither.
But gracious?
6
I really wanted to like this, and I for sure like your general proposition, which I pray for the grace to live out.
The clever move you make is excluding Trump because he doesn’t have political experience, though you're obviously taking about learning humility and empathy from all our experiences, and on that count, Trump pales in comparison even to Clinton. I would've appreciated your mentioning that.
And are you really criticizing those who experience the political battlefield as a battlefield instead of perceiving in the relentless and savage attacks they endure daily the trappings of a “friendly and hopeful place”? Here, your own empathy comes up a bit short. You are speaking as someone who may have experienced nothing harsher in your vocational life than the slings and arrows of a moderated comments page.
Finally, you missed an opportunity to reach across the aisle to the incumbent, who temperamentally speaking has come as close to the ideal you describe as any president in my lifetime.
The clever move you make is excluding Trump because he doesn’t have political experience, though you're obviously taking about learning humility and empathy from all our experiences, and on that count, Trump pales in comparison even to Clinton. I would've appreciated your mentioning that.
And are you really criticizing those who experience the political battlefield as a battlefield instead of perceiving in the relentless and savage attacks they endure daily the trappings of a “friendly and hopeful place”? Here, your own empathy comes up a bit short. You are speaking as someone who may have experienced nothing harsher in your vocational life than the slings and arrows of a moderated comments page.
Finally, you missed an opportunity to reach across the aisle to the incumbent, who temperamentally speaking has come as close to the ideal you describe as any president in my lifetime.
11
I have to wonder at, and about, David Brooks. Some days it seems he's farmed out his column to Rush Limbaugh, and other times, like today, he seems to channel Abraham Lincoln and Mother Theresa with his understanding of both politics and human nature. Wherever it came from he nailed it today. And that's why I continue to read his columns and forgive the Limbaugh days.
1
Brooks has nothing good to say about any Democrat, which hardly describes Abraham Lincoln. And if Brooks wants to channel Mother Teresa, he'll have to give up politics.
3
Hillary Clinton came of political age in an era that explicitly rejected graciousness. There was a president that embodied grace and character – Jimmy Carter and he was torn to shreds. In the 70s the American far right decided that being out of power for 40+ years was unacceptable and any tactics to change this were justified. The legions of Limbaughs, O’Reillys, etc. were engaged who's credo was venomous, vituperative distain of any idea that was not perfectly aligned with far right ideology. It would have taken a saint to resist this and still maintain an open, gracious public persona. Mrs. Clinton was not a saint and certainly has made many mistakes – so did Jefferson, Lincoln, T.R. etc.
Mrs. Clinton certainly needs to change her modus operandi to have any chance of a productive presidency but let’s remember that our entire nation needs to have a reawakening to decency as well.
Mrs. Clinton certainly needs to change her modus operandi to have any chance of a productive presidency but let’s remember that our entire nation needs to have a reawakening to decency as well.
6
"If you interpret your life as a battlefield..."
INTERPRET???
Hillary Clinton's last 40 years in public life have been beset and besieged by the worst kind of opposition imaginable: hate-filled rhetoric, outlandish accusations void of facts, and politically motivated antagonism. I can think of no one...NO ONE...over this same period of time who has endured the kind of public torment that she has. I have never been a big Hillary Clinton fan, but I must admit that I have grown to admire her willingness and ability to remain in the ring and keep on fighting. To infer that Hillary Clinton is falsely interpreting the years of outlandish hostility that has been pitted against as "a battlefield" shows that Mr. Brooks is refusing to view the world in a reasonable manner. Instead of creating cryptic, roundabout arguments about what she lacks, why don't you just see her for what she is: an extremely talented, experienced, and tenacious candidate who has far more of what it takes to be President of the United States than the stooge who is running against her. Forget about graciousness...you are just looking for another excuse to reject her. And before this election season is over, if you are honest with yourself, Mr. Brooks, you will endorse her. Make the leap, because we need her.
INTERPRET???
Hillary Clinton's last 40 years in public life have been beset and besieged by the worst kind of opposition imaginable: hate-filled rhetoric, outlandish accusations void of facts, and politically motivated antagonism. I can think of no one...NO ONE...over this same period of time who has endured the kind of public torment that she has. I have never been a big Hillary Clinton fan, but I must admit that I have grown to admire her willingness and ability to remain in the ring and keep on fighting. To infer that Hillary Clinton is falsely interpreting the years of outlandish hostility that has been pitted against as "a battlefield" shows that Mr. Brooks is refusing to view the world in a reasonable manner. Instead of creating cryptic, roundabout arguments about what she lacks, why don't you just see her for what she is: an extremely talented, experienced, and tenacious candidate who has far more of what it takes to be President of the United States than the stooge who is running against her. Forget about graciousness...you are just looking for another excuse to reject her. And before this election season is over, if you are honest with yourself, Mr. Brooks, you will endorse her. Make the leap, because we need her.
14
She's gracious enough.
13
While I somewhat agree with Mr. Brook's bird's eye assessment of Mrs. Clinton, it certainly leaves out a lot. Her experience has taught her to be very guarded and yes even defensive. Countless, pointless investigations, scurrilous charges of everything from murder to mafia ties, etc., etc., etc., have made her extremely cautious. That she has been married to a brilliant, but scandal prone political supernova, hasn't exactly helped her be more open to public questions and scrutiny. Frankly, considering everything this woman has put up with, and yes, considering even her mistakes and the subsequent years of GOP witch hunts that inevitably always follow, I often wonder why she even wants to do this anymore. You can spend your entire life in public service and then run for president against a flaming, self serving bigot for president and get criticized for being ungracious.
13
DAVID BROOKS Writes excellent commentary. I concur with his thoughts about gracious leadership. However, his attitude toward Hillary is anything but gracious. Usually he is cool and reasoned in his observations. But David has been relentless in his negative statements about Hillary. Focusing on current issues, David has never mentioned the failures of the FBI and other security agencies who are covering their butts where Hillary is concerned. As Secretary of State, in deference to the importance of her office, she was owed the highest level of coordination and oversight in maintaining the security of all of her communications, both official and private. Meaning that the FBI failed to perform one its basic tasks for the top level of government officials. The political ideologue who heads the FBI, a shill for Chainy Dubya, is using official documents to conduct a witch hunt against Hillary, to cover the fact that he failed to be proactive by providing her all of her security needs for both personal and official communication. I think it's high time for David Brooks to take a wider view of what's going on with Hillary and to admit the fact that she's been subjected to witch hunts forever. When he says that the Clintons "always blur the lines," he indicts himself for blurring the professional lines between reporting accurate facts along with opinions. Usually his style is gracious with the notable exception of the Clintons. There os no justification for his attitude.
10
"The mistakes just have to be made."
That's the only way to truly learn. I really enjoyed this piece, David! Where Clinton is concerned, however, I think you can cut her some slacks. She may not be the most of gracious leaders, but was her husband anymore gracious or the Bushes for that matter? Lincoln, King, Ghandi - these are exceptional people - once-in-a-lifetime leaders who come along every 100 years or so.
All things considered, I have tremendous respect for Clinton's discipline, intellect, and resilience. She has earned her place and respect is due. She's no saint, but then again the cutthroat game of politics is not exactly made for saints.....
That's the only way to truly learn. I really enjoyed this piece, David! Where Clinton is concerned, however, I think you can cut her some slacks. She may not be the most of gracious leaders, but was her husband anymore gracious or the Bushes for that matter? Lincoln, King, Ghandi - these are exceptional people - once-in-a-lifetime leaders who come along every 100 years or so.
All things considered, I have tremendous respect for Clinton's discipline, intellect, and resilience. She has earned her place and respect is due. She's no saint, but then again the cutthroat game of politics is not exactly made for saints.....
7
Thank you for your insightful intake of this column. Hope Mr Brooks practices the same graciousness he so wehemently preaches and openly admit he was wrong about a remarkable leader HRC.
4
Regarding your last paragraph: where have you—and those Americans to whom you refer—been for the last seven and a half years? We've experienced the most gracious president of recent history, and he has been vilified, from the day of his inauguration, by your side of the political spectrum. Perhaps Secretary Clinton would display more graciousness if pundits like you spent less time rooting around to find something else you can trumpet as a flaw.
10
All I'm reading from Mr. Brooks is that women are supposed to be nice and to him, Hillary Clinton is not nice enough. Really? That's your criticism? If only she was nicer? My god, what regressive nonsense is this. NY TImes you can do better.
11
What color is the sky in your world?
6
It is very unfortunate that you, Mr. Brooks, still continue to find issues where there are none with Clinton. If you are concerned with people being gracious, move your finger to the right of Clinton and point it directly at the GOP candidate, sigh heavily, and then keep it there.
People act as though she has gotten away with criminal activity for decades, but neglect to see that politicians who commit real, evidence-backed crimes, are actually prosecuted, and even go to jail on occasion (see Dennis Hastert, Rod Blagojevich). Hillary Clinton is the hearsay criminal, but no one ever seems to be able to substantiate their claims.
Hillary Clinton is gracious, but she is also hardened by forty years of slander and libel. As anyone would be.
People act as though she has gotten away with criminal activity for decades, but neglect to see that politicians who commit real, evidence-backed crimes, are actually prosecuted, and even go to jail on occasion (see Dennis Hastert, Rod Blagojevich). Hillary Clinton is the hearsay criminal, but no one ever seems to be able to substantiate their claims.
Hillary Clinton is gracious, but she is also hardened by forty years of slander and libel. As anyone would be.
5
That's strange. Speaking about "The Art of Gracious Leadership", without displaying a photo of Donald Trump...because there is NOTHING gracious about that man, nor is there any hint of leadership.
So. After a small reprive, it looks like Mr. Brooks has decided to mount his Republican hobbyhorse again to blast off a few more parting shots; starting with the Hillary is "distrustful" trope, before a segue into the email trope, and for the Grand Finale! -- calling her (vis a vis, her campaign) "inhuman".
Well done Mr. Brooks. You're obviously back in fine fofm after a nice long vacation at the G.O.P. camp of indoctrination.
One might have thought that the recent reincarnation of Roger Ailes, Steve Bannon of Breitbart News, and the insane "Alt-Right" movement would give you enough to talk about. But no. Back to the same ol' story.
Just bear in mind.
Clinton may have a lot of answering to do about a lot of things, but being endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan is not one of them.
So. After a small reprive, it looks like Mr. Brooks has decided to mount his Republican hobbyhorse again to blast off a few more parting shots; starting with the Hillary is "distrustful" trope, before a segue into the email trope, and for the Grand Finale! -- calling her (vis a vis, her campaign) "inhuman".
Well done Mr. Brooks. You're obviously back in fine fofm after a nice long vacation at the G.O.P. camp of indoctrination.
One might have thought that the recent reincarnation of Roger Ailes, Steve Bannon of Breitbart News, and the insane "Alt-Right" movement would give you enough to talk about. But no. Back to the same ol' story.
Just bear in mind.
Clinton may have a lot of answering to do about a lot of things, but being endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan is not one of them.
8
Mr. Brooks, I have two reactions. First, this is sexist drivel. You would never apply this to politicians such as Mr. Cheney, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Rubio, Mr. McCain, or others. The second is that HRC is not a saint. Even Mother Teresa reacted negatively when on occasion she was slandered, and Ms. Clinton has been slandered nonstop by your ilk for over three decades. She has no cheeks left to turn.
8
I will agree that Hillary has done things that have given me fits but among them I can't think of one where she had not ever been compassionate in her dealing with others. In all her years of public service she has fought for children, women, 9/11 first and second responders and many others. She has never maligned or diminished a member of any minority group, kicked a crying baby from a political event or asked a supporter to punch someone in the face. She has always had a big heart and while David does not believe she has shown the qualities to be a gracious leader, I respectfully disagree.
9
The tagline on Mr. Brooks' article today tells Mrs. Clinton that "It's not too late to learn".
Mr. Brooks, I have but one thing to say to you--
Physician, heal thyself.
Mr. Brooks, I have but one thing to say to you--
Physician, heal thyself.
12
Hillary's actually been doing it for some time. Early on after a big primary win she appealed for her own voters to understand why Trump voters were so angry and frightened. It got no coverage. I'm tired of the press talking down to her. Mr. Brooks, she is more intelligent, experienced and knowledgeable than you are - and all of your colleagues as well. Ignoring the threat of Mr. Trump wouldn't be polite, it would be dangerous.
9
So, we should elect Donald Trump? No thanks; I'll stick with Mrs. Clinton.
8
Mr. Brooks should be more gracious and extend compliments to the extraordinary leadership of Barack Obama, whose intelligence, thoughtfulness and decency, along with a total lack of malice, is a model to the world.
.
.
4
HIllary Clinton was the personification of grace under fire during the 11 grueling hours of testimony at the House Benghazi hearings.
President Obama demonstrated the same during his entire period in office, challenged by incomprehensible obstruction and even birther challenges by the likes of Donald Trump and virtual silence by the GOP.
Donald Trump is the antithesis of gracious leadership as he mimics a disabled reporter, basks in the chants of his supporters to "lock her up" and on a Tarmac in California, tells his audience to "look at my African-American supporter over there".
President Obama demonstrated the same during his entire period in office, challenged by incomprehensible obstruction and even birther challenges by the likes of Donald Trump and virtual silence by the GOP.
Donald Trump is the antithesis of gracious leadership as he mimics a disabled reporter, basks in the chants of his supporters to "lock her up" and on a Tarmac in California, tells his audience to "look at my African-American supporter over there".
354
Mr. Brooks, first you complained that Secretary Clinton lacked a hobby such as golf, and now you decry her lack of "graciousness". What next? She should bake more cookies to qualify as our Commander in Chief? Would you issue these criticisms of any male candidate? I think not. You are desperate to pin her on something, anything, in your disappointment over the candidate your party has produced. Please examine your motivations. Thank you.
326
Queen Elizabeth II is gracious, but now we need a leader like FDR, tempered in pain and filled with empathy and resolve. Secretary Clinton can do that.
7
Humility, eh? Well well! In place of hubris. In place of defensiveness and control. I'll say this for Hillary: she's developed a tough skin in reaction to years of justified and unjustified attacks. I suppose politicians have to have tough skin; they're playing a blood sport, after all. But maybe you've lost it all if you're not with fair regularity brought to places where you just have to say, "Lord, have mercy."
4
"...a whiff of inhumanity about her campaign" Really David? Could you perhaps be more explicit about the nature of the 'inhumanity? And what sort of 'graciousness' are you looking for in Hillary Clinton? This column is utterly mystifying.
5
"A whiff of inhumanity", really? David, I suppose we should all be thankful you're not penning long columns questioning Clinton's health or stamina but that's over the top.
Much subtler is your snubbing of our most gracious sitting president in favor of Vaclav Havel and Dorothy Day. One does not need to share Obama's politics to admire the way he rises above indignities no other president has been expected to endure.
Much subtler is your snubbing of our most gracious sitting president in favor of Vaclav Havel and Dorothy Day. One does not need to share Obama's politics to admire the way he rises above indignities no other president has been expected to endure.
5
Quick question from a Black lawyer in Washington DC:
Mr. Brooks, did I miss something, because the last time I checked the FBI doesn't launch criminal investigations because somebody was gracious.
Maybe laws and/or criminal standards have changed?
Just kidding. It's 11:20am in Washington DC and if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist as federal law. Mr. Brooks, get a grip my friend.
Mr. Brooks, did I miss something, because the last time I checked the FBI doesn't launch criminal investigations because somebody was gracious.
Maybe laws and/or criminal standards have changed?
Just kidding. It's 11:20am in Washington DC and if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist as federal law. Mr. Brooks, get a grip my friend.
2
You, like the rest of Trumps minions, continue to regurgitate the " email scandal" dogma of ignorance. Hillary Clinton spent 11 continuous hours, being grilled by a hostile Republican panel of partisan hacks whose sole intention was to destroy her and she was also given the same treatment by the FBI, they found nothing of any significance. Why do you continue to suggest she has a problem and there are questions swirling around the email "scandal", there is nothing. The bigger scandal, is your incompetence as an honest journalist as you talk about humility while doing the work of the biggest narcissist in the history of our politics.
7
Just more conservative clap-trap about Clinton not being "nice" enough, something Brooks would never write about a male candidate. Everyone admits her superior experience, but laments that she doesn't come across as friendly and compliant. There are tough times ahead, important issues to deal with, and "nice" won't cut it. I think Clinton has learned from her experiences, but not in the way Brooks would like. She's learned to be steely in the face of controversy and false accusations. She's learned not to let her frustration show, as she's has to justify over and over again her actions and decisions. Many men could not handle the long hours she's spent defending her decisions from zealous partisan attacks designed to do nothing more than humiliate her. So, yes, maybe she's not as "gracious" as some would like her to be, but for what she'll face as president, her resolve, steely determination and firmness will serve her well. If you want "nice," go visit your grandma.
8
I believe President Obama exemplifies a gracious leader. How can you overlook him Mr Brooks?
8
This column could not have been run on a more appropriate day--Women's Equality Day. We have two candidates in this election, one who lies every time he opens his mouth, screams endlessly, engages in kindergarten level name calling and bases his campaign on bigotry, misogyny and xenophobia. We have another candidate who has put out endless pages of policy, talks policy non-stop at every event, does not engage in any name calling and is the most experienced nominee for the presidency in decades. So which one according to Brooks is lacking in grace? The woman--of course.
Anyone who thinks that Hillary is not being held to an impossible standard while there are no standards of any kind applied to her opponent is not paying attention.
Anyone who thinks that Hillary is not being held to an impossible standard while there are no standards of any kind applied to her opponent is not paying attention.
12
I think you've confused Washington D.C. with Camelot. The mythical one.
5
Would that Mr. Brooks had exhibited a touch of graciousness himself in lieu of the falsely grace tone he foists on us here. I'd settle even for a bit of common sense. The email business is not a "scandal." It's an acknowledged mistake, pure and simple. It's one with precedent. And it seems to have had no consequences -- except to drive obsessives who want to investigate and investigate until they find something untoward. This unseemly repetition would raise anyone's hackles, and I'm not going to condemn Mrs. Clinton for being a human being. Your columnist would do well to instead look into his party's relentless campaign against Mrs. Clinton since the mid '90s. How well would you bear up under those circumstances, Mr. Brooks?
9
What does "We are better together." mean to you if not trust in her fellow citizens?
2
So all DJT needs to do is come clean as a gracious mendacious racist/misogynist.
4
I don't know what you are talking about Mr.Brooks; I find Hillary very gracious when not abused by made up scandals from right wing Hillary haters. I would like to see how you would react to half the blows Hillary takes.
6
Lovely article-- however, has it ever occurred to you Hillary Clinton's complete and utter lack of emotion in response to all media driven fronts both slanderous and mysoginist ( ie emails, clothing, health, pitch, etc...) is due to utter innocence?
Where there's nothing to defend, why lie down and act gracious?
Where there's nothing to defend, why lie down and act gracious?
3
It appears that Brooks is conceding, or perhaps hopefully praying, that Clinton is going to be our next president. How kind of him to offer his observations and suggestions to make her a better president and leader. I imagine there will be subsequent advice columns for Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, et al.
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you'll look for the good news in people and not the bad." I heard that mantra again and again as I watched the Republican National Convention. The upbeat. The positive. The magnificence of the human spirit. Perhaps, Mr. Brooks, if you clean your own house first, you'll have some standing to clean someone else's.
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you'll look for the good news in people and not the bad." I heard that mantra again and again as I watched the Republican National Convention. The upbeat. The positive. The magnificence of the human spirit. Perhaps, Mr. Brooks, if you clean your own house first, you'll have some standing to clean someone else's.
2
A "whiff of inhumanity" is not an accurate description of her reaction to her email scandal. Once again, Mr. Brooks, you seem detached and elitist. Is it comfortable up there?
2
Your failure to include President Obama's 'grace under pressure' shows that you don't know what you're talking about, or are intentionally lying by omission.
And after vicious attacks by nasty Conservative gang members every day for the last 25 years, doesn't Hillary Clinton have the right to be a little weary of you guys?
And after vicious attacks by nasty Conservative gang members every day for the last 25 years, doesn't Hillary Clinton have the right to be a little weary of you guys?
3
I cannot believe that an opinion regarding gracious leadership ends with criticizing Mrs. Clinton. Have you forgotten the other nominee who equates graciousness with pandering to the fears and bias of a live audience. No, Mr. Brooks, Mrs. Clinton will not be transformed into your perfect leader so you can connect with her spiritually (you will just have to live with that little disappointment). She has learned to be guarded and defensive under a quarter century onslaught of criticism from superior intellects like yourself. Be assured, however, that Mr. Trump will become the vile despot delighted to rule over "Trump USA". Let's hope he RULES graciously - we wouldn't want you to be uncomfortable.
1
Experience alone is certainly not enough --- consider Richard Nixon.
If there's a right way and a wrong way the Clintons will look for a third way. No one knows why. It makes them excellent politicians and poor trustees. So, we all agree to let them hold office but not our wallets.
Looking at Trump's success this year, we probably don't deserve better than Hillary.
Looking at Trump's success this year, we probably don't deserve better than Hillary.
This tiresome idea that there is a right way and a wrong way in these matters really bugs me. In many cases the Clinton's third way has been better than any of that tawdry nonsense. That is, when it has kept despicable conservatives away from positions of power. Nothing beats that, for me.
3
Brooks just described President Obama. Look how much his graciousness was appreciated by the GOP and their supporters. Mrs. Clinton is much better off sticking to this model of leadership: "Be yourself." What's that? Oh, yeah, she is ALREADY doing that.
2
"Clinton scandals are all the same. " so true, they are right wing conspiracy that continue to waste millions of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ of taxpayers monies. I think it was $600 million Whitewater and lost track of all the other right wing conspiracy and investigations one right after another. If anything the republicans have tenacity but they never win it is just theory without proof and the wasting away of taxpayers coffers. I am not a Clinton fan but not because of all the lies you all throw at her, but because she is a war hawk, and repug light.
As thoughtful as you can be and soul searching as you are, it is surprising that you are still a republican. When are you going to grow up?
As thoughtful as you can be and soul searching as you are, it is surprising that you are still a republican. When are you going to grow up?
4
"Lock her up," "Hillary for Prison," promises to indict her on Trump's first day in office (forget about what presidents can and can't do legally) and of course "second amendment people" maybe can do something about her if she's elected. All from Trump or prime time speakers at the RNC. Brittle? She'd have to be comatose not to be defensive.
Does anyone else remember the Bush White House having all their emails on private services and then deleting them (millions of them) before they left office? Enough with the Clinton rules.
Does anyone else remember the Bush White House having all their emails on private services and then deleting them (millions of them) before they left office? Enough with the Clinton rules.
4
David: It is unbelievable you can write a whole article about The Art of Gracious Leadership without mentioning President Obama once. Shameful.
7
Curiously, how much of a beating is one expected to take and still be an example of graciousness? If you're talking about Whitewater as an example, the AR prosecutor knew there was no case and refused to be a part of it. Was she, nevertheless, supposed to be gracious about that attack. Perhaps Secretary Clinton has learned to shutter her response to attacks in order to accomplish her commendable lifetime objectives. It appears obvious that she can't shut down her enemies. It reminds me of Rene Girard's scapegoating teachings.
Ask yourself...How many could remain productive in spite of these never-ending concentrated efforts to be brought down? Could you? I couldn't. Perhaps you should have reviewed Hillary's eleven hour House/Representatives appearance regarding Benghazi before you wrote today's 'graciousness' column.
Ask yourself...How many could remain productive in spite of these never-ending concentrated efforts to be brought down? Could you? I couldn't. Perhaps you should have reviewed Hillary's eleven hour House/Representatives appearance regarding Benghazi before you wrote today's 'graciousness' column.
5
A column penned by a white man, circa 1950s.
11
This interesting article seems to be skirting around another issue, which is about individual faith. One cannot assume Hillary has the kind of faith that David seems to be referencing, indirectly, just because she attends church and mentions her religion upon occasion as an important element in her life. Grace, or graciousness, cannot be faked. And it is clear that, at least so far, Clinton fails to express it. She does express much that is laudable. But David’s point is well-taken: without humility one’s confidence and/or ability tends to be self-referential and defensive.
The advantage of a deep faith – which Lincoln and Ghandi both had – is that the individual’s acknowledgement of a power beyond themselves brings them into contact with a sense of mercy [assuming this higher power is a merciful loving one], freeing them to express that quality and to expect it from others. The mentality that penned “.. the angels of our better natures” had some sense that the good in men prevails over the evil. Hillary is an energetic do-gooder, but her defensive posture toward criticism of her mistakes suggests a lack of trust in good – or the presence of mercy – as an operative principle. Maybe the Presidency itself will help her to outgrown this awkward ambivalence toward the truth.
The advantage of a deep faith – which Lincoln and Ghandi both had – is that the individual’s acknowledgement of a power beyond themselves brings them into contact with a sense of mercy [assuming this higher power is a merciful loving one], freeing them to express that quality and to expect it from others. The mentality that penned “.. the angels of our better natures” had some sense that the good in men prevails over the evil. Hillary is an energetic do-gooder, but her defensive posture toward criticism of her mistakes suggests a lack of trust in good – or the presence of mercy – as an operative principle. Maybe the Presidency itself will help her to outgrown this awkward ambivalence toward the truth.
11
The bible says "By their fruit you shall know them". Clinton could have become a lobbyist, or ripped people off as a real estate tycoon, or painted portraits in her bathtub. Instead, she has invested her political capital in improving the lives of women and children and healthcare. She has invested her celebtity and contacts into raising money to help "the least of these" around the world. This demonstrates faith far more than pious mentions of God in the public shpere.
3
You say that with experience you learn you're "not quite as good or talented as you think." I would assert that with aging we women discover that we are in fact MORE talented than others would have had us believe about ourselves. As a young woman Hillary Clinton certainly never aspired to the Presidency. Except for Dorothy Day, the examples you gave of gracious people are men. It may be that women who make it to leadership positions have had to wear armor.
349
Mr. Brooks:
So, is this column a gracious expression of your forgiveness? Nice to know that you are still learning from your disastrous conservative former self. Goodness gracious from battlefields to press conferences, you are just full of helpful advice. Does this mean you are no longer a republican? Now, you need to work on your hidebound ideological views. It's never too late!
So, is this column a gracious expression of your forgiveness? Nice to know that you are still learning from your disastrous conservative former self. Goodness gracious from battlefields to press conferences, you are just full of helpful advice. Does this mean you are no longer a republican? Now, you need to work on your hidebound ideological views. It's never too late!
2
In response to many commentators who say they cannot name one politician with whom they associate the word gracious or graceful: take a look at President Obama. He has demonstrated grace, graciousness, commitment to fundamental moral and ethical values that are the best of American tradition - and continues to do so - even after seven and a half years of Republican obstruction, insult and defamation. His courage and inner strength reflect a depth of character that Trump can never even recognize, no less aspire to. Trump is a lost soul, a huckster in search of policies, an opportunist who can only shout, insult, accuse - an empty vessel playing on the anger and frustration of those who cannot accept that our world is changing: innovation adaptation education are fundamental to moving forward. Obama is an elegant, thoughtful leader, a model of excellence in personal and political behavior.
7
I still remember David how you fawned over W's muscular and self-assured leadership. How about that graciousness?
How about the gracious congressional leadership?
Hillary is a flawed candidate. She took about 98% of your column today. How about the elephants in the room?
PS We have a president with gracious leadership. How about his graciousness?
How about the gracious congressional leadership?
Hillary is a flawed candidate. She took about 98% of your column today. How about the elephants in the room?
PS We have a president with gracious leadership. How about his graciousness?
254
Well, David, and I hate to put it this way, but you seem to be looking for a nanny president or a nanny leader. Leaders, by the very nature of the game, will disappoint as many people as they enthrall. And leaders, again by the nature of the game, simply can't lay all their cards out on the table. Some leaders have big, engaging personalities, some don't. Some leaders you want to have a beer or coffee with, some you don't. Probably doesn't matter all that much. Can you get the job done, keep the car out of the ditch, keep the playing field fair and equitable, have some sense of the future and how you want to get us there? And, ok, sure, can you inspire? And, ok, can you bring opposing factions together for some common purpose? But at certain point, leaders probably just need to get out of our way. Let us figure it out. We need a president, not a friend, and certainly not a nanny.
102
The lost of gracious leadership.
Let's put dates on it...Rush Limbaugh replaces Morton Downey, Jr. and reaches 5 million listeners by late 80's, then 20 million in the mid-90s; enter Fox news in the '96...roll out Hannity, O'reilly and the 'faux news' strategy. Flank it with Coulter, Beck, and Drudge Report that provide cover for the Bachman, Palin and others...and now Breibart.
The 'listening' numbers (reach and time spent) is staggering and overwhelms anything NYT or WashPost, ABC-CBS, CNN ish 'liberal media' reach. The degrading discourse right wing radio, internet and TV pursue is a virulent pathogen to anything thoughtful or gracious.
It allows an Arizona Gov. to yell and figure waggle a visiting President, a journeyman congressman to scream 'you lie' at a state of the union address, a disrespectful O'reily interviewing our first black President and the emergence of a reality show narcisscist leading the birther movement, white supremacist polls and ted nugent '2nd amendment' solutions advocates---without one ounce of graciousness.
Meanwhile, both President Obama and HRC have remained as dignified as possible in this cess-pool crude anti-gracious assaults.
Yes, do tell, where has all the gracious leaders gone?
Let's put dates on it...Rush Limbaugh replaces Morton Downey, Jr. and reaches 5 million listeners by late 80's, then 20 million in the mid-90s; enter Fox news in the '96...roll out Hannity, O'reilly and the 'faux news' strategy. Flank it with Coulter, Beck, and Drudge Report that provide cover for the Bachman, Palin and others...and now Breibart.
The 'listening' numbers (reach and time spent) is staggering and overwhelms anything NYT or WashPost, ABC-CBS, CNN ish 'liberal media' reach. The degrading discourse right wing radio, internet and TV pursue is a virulent pathogen to anything thoughtful or gracious.
It allows an Arizona Gov. to yell and figure waggle a visiting President, a journeyman congressman to scream 'you lie' at a state of the union address, a disrespectful O'reily interviewing our first black President and the emergence of a reality show narcisscist leading the birther movement, white supremacist polls and ted nugent '2nd amendment' solutions advocates---without one ounce of graciousness.
Meanwhile, both President Obama and HRC have remained as dignified as possible in this cess-pool crude anti-gracious assaults.
Yes, do tell, where has all the gracious leaders gone?
4
I'll take "a whiff of inhumanity" over Trump's continual stench of narcissistic sociopathy.
2
I read the piece before scrolling up to see who wrote it, and bet myself it would be a man. It must be difficult for a man, for whom graciousness is interpreted as a signal of strength, to understand that for a woman is does not come across that way. It comes across as a signal that she will defer. Clinton has figured out how to get a circle of men to hear what she says in a meeting, that's awesome. For a women in any form of power, it seems competence is never enough. In seemingly less scripted moments, Clinton projects plenty of charm.
3
The most insightful point in this column is when you alluded to the inhumanity of Clinton. While Trump brings to the table all the foibles and often ugliness of being all too human, Clinton is down-right inhuman, because nothing about her is authentic. If the bobble-head nodding doesn't repulse you, then that Charlie McCarthy rictus surely will, or maybe the Wicked Witch of the West cackle. Clinton lacks grace, because she is not gracious. You cannot be gracious if you see yourself as entitled and above the rules that are meant for all the little people. Everything about Mrs. Clinton makes most honest people's skin crawl. The whole case for a Hillary Clinton presidency has been reduced to accusing Donald Trump of being a racist. This is the only course that can possibly make Trump more nauseating than Clinton, but given that Trump has been in the public eye for decades, it seems a little too convenient to now discover that he is a racist.
2
I usually like David Brooks, but this column is nonsense. Hillary Clinton has been attacked unmercifully and unfoundedly for 25 years, and Brooks can't ever seem to factor this in. Why is he shocked, shocked at Clinton's "withholding"? I'd withhold, too, if I'd had that history.
At least he offers her some "redemption" if she does it his way; I guess that's something....
At least he offers her some "redemption" if she does it his way; I guess that's something....
4
After enduring 25 years of the lowest, scurrilous and untrue personal attacks, HIllary Clinton is to be criticized as being too defensive? She's not gracious, you say — she has failed to learn from experience? Where do you think these behaviors come from if not from the school of hard knocks from public life? This is a patronizing essay, a prime example of double standards, if not mansplaining. You should be embarrassed, Mr. Brooks.
3
For me best testament for a gracious and humane leader is Clinton Foundation. Now I understand they must outsource the initiative to 3rd party but it shows how Clintons have risked their political career to do good for the society. There is no proof of Pay for Play. So we must not forget the good work on Clinton Foundation before denouncing it. Clintons are truly a "transformational" figures and foundation is the best example. For me Clintons are already their and thats Hillary should be the POTUS so that they can do the good in a "better" way.
5
Thank you David for injecting Humility into the national dialog - I hope others can jump on board as well - we need it!
Cheers,
Jonathan
Cheers,
Jonathan
I disagree. My formerly negative opinion of Hillary, which was colored by the opinions of those who dislike her and judge her as untrustworthy, has been changed by witnessing her graciousness and equanimity under stress and attack. Usually, Brooks is insightful; in this article he needs to clean up the lens on his glasses.
6
I'm sorry, did I stumble upon the NY Times comics section?
I've asked this before, and I blame Harvard for my inability to understand, but isn't Mr. Brooks supposed to be smart? Some sort of intellectual?
If so, why is he struggling with the definition of gracious?
Gracious leadership isn't lying 59 times about the same email server question to everyone from Congress, to the FBI, the media and the American people. Grace requires integrity, or it lacks authenticity. Have you ever known a graceful liar?
It's time to get serious.
And for those who criticized me when I said David Brooks isn't a Conservative, he just pretended to be one to get a job, I've got three reasons why I was right all along.
1. Magna
2. Cum.
3. Laude.
I missed a question on a geography quiz in 1991.
That was the last time I missed a question on anything I've ever written. So the odds of me being wrong rank up there with the odds that Michelle Obama would share donuts with you.
I've asked this before, and I blame Harvard for my inability to understand, but isn't Mr. Brooks supposed to be smart? Some sort of intellectual?
If so, why is he struggling with the definition of gracious?
Gracious leadership isn't lying 59 times about the same email server question to everyone from Congress, to the FBI, the media and the American people. Grace requires integrity, or it lacks authenticity. Have you ever known a graceful liar?
It's time to get serious.
And for those who criticized me when I said David Brooks isn't a Conservative, he just pretended to be one to get a job, I've got three reasons why I was right all along.
1. Magna
2. Cum.
3. Laude.
I missed a question on a geography quiz in 1991.
That was the last time I missed a question on anything I've ever written. So the odds of me being wrong rank up there with the odds that Michelle Obama would share donuts with you.
1
David.....as always....enjoyed the piece. Whilst reading, a quote attributed to John Quincy Adams came to mind: "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more....you are a leader"
Not sure our two, tragically flawed, major party candidates have the capacity to come anywhere close to JQA's criteria.
Not sure our two, tragically flawed, major party candidates have the capacity to come anywhere close to JQA's criteria.
Mr. Brooks sounds very like a religious fanatic. Our candidate is supposed to be gracious to a bull?? Get real. She is able and our only possibility for continued freedom.
6
Clinton received more than say 50,000 emails over a 4 year span. That's about 1500 days, that's about 30 to 40 emails a day if not more when you include secret stuff sent oven another channel.. Many of these were handled by staff.
If you are an agency head you will get the normal string of requests as would a Congressman or a Senator or a governor. The Clinton Foundation, while independent, was ultimately going to have some of its donors make requests to State who may or may not have been looking for an undue favor. We don't know. Why can't people make this giant leap? Trump treats each of these requests like a pay-for-play sandal even though most of the requests were handled by State protocols.
Hillary had to juggle a private life and a public life while on the road. How come you never mention this David?
On a more important note all readers need to keep it simple with regard to Donald Trump. This is the overriding cloud that follows/sticks to Donald Trump wherever he goes. Don't disregard it.
Think back, think now.
During the 2012 election cycle, although he was not my favorite and I thought it would be close, I did not worry that Mitt Romney would not be a good president. He had left tracks. Donald Trump has left tracks too. He has shown a major character flaws which beyond all else disqualify him from being President.
If you are an agency head you will get the normal string of requests as would a Congressman or a Senator or a governor. The Clinton Foundation, while independent, was ultimately going to have some of its donors make requests to State who may or may not have been looking for an undue favor. We don't know. Why can't people make this giant leap? Trump treats each of these requests like a pay-for-play sandal even though most of the requests were handled by State protocols.
Hillary had to juggle a private life and a public life while on the road. How come you never mention this David?
On a more important note all readers need to keep it simple with regard to Donald Trump. This is the overriding cloud that follows/sticks to Donald Trump wherever he goes. Don't disregard it.
Think back, think now.
During the 2012 election cycle, although he was not my favorite and I thought it would be close, I did not worry that Mitt Romney would not be a good president. He had left tracks. Donald Trump has left tracks too. He has shown a major character flaws which beyond all else disqualify him from being President.
2
Mr. Brooks,
what you presented here is foolish. We are facing severe consequences of climate change, we are still sitting on a massive stockpile of globally lethal power. We , even in this country, are suffering severe poverty, not even talking about the rest of the planet, your political friends show as complete science deniers, brutal racism still all over the place. Need I go on? And you are contemplating about grace.
This is foolish.
what you presented here is foolish. We are facing severe consequences of climate change, we are still sitting on a massive stockpile of globally lethal power. We , even in this country, are suffering severe poverty, not even talking about the rest of the planet, your political friends show as complete science deniers, brutal racism still all over the place. Need I go on? And you are contemplating about grace.
This is foolish.
5
Nice try, David. I get it. Trump lacks graciousness because he lacks political experience. Give him a little more time and he'll figure it out. Sure. Hillary has enough experience that there is no excuse for the "whiff of inhumanity about her campaign that inspires distrust." Right.
"Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness." Yes, that's right, we saw that happen every day with President Obama and his GOP colleagues, as well as the right-wing media, yourself included.
Hillary knows who her friends are, and there are more than enough. She also recognizes her enemies very clearly. Guess which one you are?
"Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness." Yes, that's right, we saw that happen every day with President Obama and his GOP colleagues, as well as the right-wing media, yourself included.
Hillary knows who her friends are, and there are more than enough. She also recognizes her enemies very clearly. Guess which one you are?
7
Query: Would you have written this is if the Democratic candidate was a man?
Before you begin to moralize about Ms. Clinton, take a gimlet-eyed look at the party you support and have supported all of these years. Where is the grace in the Republican Party, in how it has operated and "performed" from Gingrich to the present day? I note that you have omitted President Obama from your list of leaders who possess grace. Has not his Jackie-Robinson-like restraint in the face of vicious attacks of racism, lies, and other forms of stupidities from the right not earned him this honor? And before you take another rosy view of our WW II generals, try to pry an instant of grace from the likes of Douglas McArthur, Mark Clark, and Geroge Patton.
If experience and grace are both important in a President, in your view, then the Republicans have nominated a man at the bottom of the barrel in both categories. And then ask yourself, are the Clinton "scandals" really such, or is it only because Republicans try to create them (Benghazi being the most notable example of nothing there, Whitewater also). Put your life -- or anyone's-- in front of Republican House Committees looking to make hay, and we would be forced to conclude that you are hopelessly mired in scandel too. It is an easy, dirty, and hypocritical trick.
Before you begin to moralize about Ms. Clinton, take a gimlet-eyed look at the party you support and have supported all of these years. Where is the grace in the Republican Party, in how it has operated and "performed" from Gingrich to the present day? I note that you have omitted President Obama from your list of leaders who possess grace. Has not his Jackie-Robinson-like restraint in the face of vicious attacks of racism, lies, and other forms of stupidities from the right not earned him this honor? And before you take another rosy view of our WW II generals, try to pry an instant of grace from the likes of Douglas McArthur, Mark Clark, and Geroge Patton.
If experience and grace are both important in a President, in your view, then the Republicans have nominated a man at the bottom of the barrel in both categories. And then ask yourself, are the Clinton "scandals" really such, or is it only because Republicans try to create them (Benghazi being the most notable example of nothing there, Whitewater also). Put your life -- or anyone's-- in front of Republican House Committees looking to make hay, and we would be forced to conclude that you are hopelessly mired in scandel too. It is an easy, dirty, and hypocritical trick.
5
Using the word gracious when referring to either one of these candidates is comical. Its only August and the race card is thrown down by both Clinton and Trump. Its silly because neither is a racist and they can both show many instances in their long lives to prove that...
They are, however, both elitist, and out of touch. When you look at life from the back seat of limo while being protected by 24 hour body guards for the last 30 years you cant begin to fathom what most of us go through on a daily basis.
They are, however, both elitist, and out of touch. When you look at life from the back seat of limo while being protected by 24 hour body guards for the last 30 years you cant begin to fathom what most of us go through on a daily basis.
1
The Republican smear machine has spent twenty-five years attacking Hillary to the point where claims about her "lying" and "corruption" are as accepted as facts. What is so troubling about Brooks' column today is that he perpetuates this legacy of calumny.
5
People like Mr. Brooks keep looking for an excuse for why they don't like Hillary Clinton to excuse their own failure to be able to accept her on the same terms that they accept other (male) politicians. This is just a higher-middle-brow version of complaining about her voice.
5
Other commenters have pointed out the flagrant sexism and mansplaining in today's Hallmark I mean Brooks column. But honestly this column belongs in the Lifestyle section. Such pablum. I'm really a little surprised David didn't refer to HRC as President Clinton's wife, and comment on her pantsuits as well.
3
The Clintons are what I call "grubbers". I do not think they were ever taught to be sharing, gracious, truthful citizens. The Clintons are here " by hook and by crook" Compare Michelle Obama to Hillary Clinton. Michelle Obama is a gracious woman. Look at Michelle Obama's parents, her brother, her children. Michelle Obama learned by example from her parents to be a gracious human.
Being gracious means practicing many of the traits that make a good citizen. The Clintons are not gracious.
Being gracious means practicing many of the traits that make a good citizen. The Clintons are not gracious.
Wrong column at the wrong time!
5
I am certainly sure that Mrs. Clinton could learn a few things from your suggestions because she certainly does have experiences that she can draw upon thanks to the folks she deals with that have little to no experience. The lies from so-called conservative news organizations that generate a stupid electorate are not good experiences to draw from today. I give you Donald J. Trump, by far the worst candidate for President that this country has ever produced. He makes Barry Goldwater appear logical.
2
Unlike many NYT readers, I don't feel obligated to immediately bash Mr. Brooks with irrelevant comments. Like Dana who invokes Jackie O and the 50s, which have zero to do with the topic. The grace Mr. Brooks is talking about has nothing to do with this. While I absolutely agree that Hillary has been demonized unfairly for decades, she does not do herself any favors by misstating easily checked facts or saying things that others can contradict.
Basically, David Brooks just described Barack Obama to a tee!
12
Mr. Brooks offers no names of people who fill the bill other than historical icons. Our system of politics is raw and rough and tumble. Sure the press contributes and exacerbates this but this is the reality. A humble and gracious Hillary would get rolled by the Trumps & McConnells. John Boehner tried a bid but got fed up biting his tongue. It doesn't work in this environment. Give it up David and get on board. You are more of a Democrat than a Trumper.
1
David Brooks has certainly attacked Hillary Clinton for years, but he writes so well that I am compelled to read his essays.
1
i would have liked the column if only you, Mr Brooks, had been more honest about the malevolence she faces, and the lies that some Republicans are ready to spread. write a column about HOW to be gracious in the real world she faces!
9
I am not a fan of the Clintons but the right wing attacks against her for the past thirty years makes her defensive. These attacks have been relentless and in many cases false. The Republicans in Congress have deliberately overblown Benghazi and the emails in order to weaken her campaign. Mitch Mc Connell and his fellow GOP are a nasty group. The Republicans supporting Trump are nasty too-Gingrich and our former major. David Brooks has been a supporter of these conservatives for many years
9
David, your brain seems to be turning to mush. What you are suggesting Hilary Clinton do would be suicidal in today's daily media frenzy. She learned a long time ago that anything she does will be twisted by ambitious careerists like yourself and the babbling brooks that inhabit 24 hour news and social media. She apparently has quite a number of really good friends and they describe her as gracious. She's tough, experienced, and humane. That's all I need in a president. And she's lacking in testosterone, and that's what the world needs now!
12
"unseemly but not felonius" "never coming clean", etc. I do indeed see a pattern of deception here - an endless cycle of meritless rumors and fake "scandals" promoted by the GOP. Why is any of this HRC's fault? There is no behavior of any kind that will keep these dogs off her heels. What does she have to gain be cooperating with these abusers in any way? I am remninded of what Makr Shields said regarding the "vast anti-Clinton conspiracy" remark. Not a conspiracy, but a vast anti-Clinton industry. In David Brooks's mind, HRC has been defined by lies others have told for so long that he can no longer make out that there was never any there there.
6
I only ever hear the expression "sharp elbows" when a man is referring to a woman in power. So I pretty much know the slant of this article. But really, "she's doesn't treat the world as a hopeful place, she doesn't trust her fellow citizens? What??!! That's it -- the best conservative arguments you can muster against Hillary? I'm not a supporter of Hillary's policies, but I expect more of a cogent article, rather than a polite but very emotional rant from the NY Times opinion page.
1
Short version: I don't like Clinton, but geez, look at Trump.
Would you be gracious if all you did was face a hostile dysfunctional yet overly influential wrongheaded right, bent on your destruction?
3
The email scandal constitutes a "whiff of inhumanity?" Stunningly stupid, yes. Self-damaging, yes. Bad judgment, yes. It is not inhumanity. Many of your columns really stretch to make some point consistent with whatever fanciful thought you are experiencing, but his was ridiculous. It was certainly not graceful.
1
"You will close yourself off to those who can help."
Who is trying to help Clinton? The Republicans have been witch hunting her to death for the last 25 years with an enabling press. If I were her I wouldn't trust people nearly as much as she does.
I also notice you left out Obama on your list of people you deem gracious.
Who is trying to help Clinton? The Republicans have been witch hunting her to death for the last 25 years with an enabling press. If I were her I wouldn't trust people nearly as much as she does.
I also notice you left out Obama on your list of people you deem gracious.
11
It is easy for your Mr. Brooks to sit in your office and think of another little article that occupies most of your time. Unlike so for Hillary Clinton, which as you rightly comment is experienced and perhaps has some flaws, but who does not. I would like to see you for 40 years under bombardment by a malicious right that has nothing else on its mind than taking you down, run a family, run a campaign and listen to hundreds of advisers every day. We do not select idols for the high office, we select people that have skills and abilities to do this. None of our Presidents has been ideal, they all had flaws, some less some more. However, in this election we are selecting a candidate who clearly has skills and experience, the ability to step in and steer this ship called America. On the other side we have a terrible human being, a guy who demeans and degrades people, who is a racists and who openly displays his total lack of knowledge of everything from economics to immigration, from world affairs to trade. I also trust that Hillary went through fire, has been able to feel the pulse of this country and she may turn out to be one of the best Presidents we had.
10
I take your point David and yet have to say that it would be hard for anyone to remain gracious after 25 years of scurrilous machinations, hectoring, slander, half truths, unseemly hostility and disparagement and downright rudeness. Considering the horrifically bad behavior she's been exposed to I think Hillary has shown patience and grace. There is no doubt that a big portion of America (and I'm afraid you're included) has a problem with Hillary being a woman as much as it has had with Barack being black.
9
And in what Republican president, among all those you have supported, would you find such "graciousness," David? I think you would have to go back to Eisenhower, who is, really, before our time. One might make a case for Kennedy, Carter, and… Obama… but those would all be people you found flawed.
4
Mr. Brook's sensitive nose detects a "whiff of inhumanity" in the Clinton campaign.
As opposed to the Trump campaign, where there's a stench.
As opposed to the Trump campaign, where there's a stench.
4
Graciousness is great if you are having a garden party, but this isn't one! Hillary has the right to be stiff and unbending after the severe scrutiny she has endured after 35 years. GOP have made sport of investigating her for however long it suits them, without receiving any different answer from her first to her last. Anyone would know that truth is the same story all the time, whereas stories made of lies are different every time you tell them! Hillary Clinton needs to be as strong and unbending as she is to combat the bad guys abroad or at home. Try to imagine a gracious tea party hostess dealing with Putin or the North Korean leader! Get real!
9
Thank you, David Brooks, and by the way I loved your character book briefly until I loaned it out and it hasn't returned despite a request (sigh...). At any rate I vote for at least a tiny mention of Barack Obama in any discussion of graceful leadership. The first time I voted for someone else but willingly voted for him the second time, mostly on style. He isn't without his own bull-headedness (the government shutdown ridiculousness being a case in point) but overall I believe we'll go a long time before we see similar leadership. Again, thanks for initiating a discussion of the topic!
Hillary indeed has a complex. Her motto is "just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean that someone is not out to get you" This attitude puts the country in danger of Trump being the next President.
The fact that both Bill and Hillary ascended to power from working/middle class familes prevented them from experiencing just how to handle power and influence. In today's America, and in the last 20 or 30 years, it was easy to believe one needed to be conniving, cunning and deceiving. This is the Clinton's. They are mentally brilliant. They also seem willing to do anything to win, including that which may be defined by others as shady.
The fact that both Bill and Hillary ascended to power from working/middle class familes prevented them from experiencing just how to handle power and influence. In today's America, and in the last 20 or 30 years, it was easy to believe one needed to be conniving, cunning and deceiving. This is the Clinton's. They are mentally brilliant. They also seem willing to do anything to win, including that which may be defined by others as shady.
Silly me. Given the title, I thought this was going to be another gracious piece about Mr. Brooks' new BFF, Barak Obama. If he is not the current standard, who is?
2
Humility and grace are qualities we should all admire and ultimate strive to possess but reading Mr Brooks' column brought to mind the "swift boating" of John Kerry. How does one function with humility and grace in a political environment with an opposition that has no soul? The Serenity Prayer comes to mind as one finds something other than being President of the United States to do.
3
How ironic that in a column about graciousness in political leadership, Mr. Brooks focuses on Hillary Clinton rather than Donald Trump. But let's look at the reality. President Obama attempted to be gracious to Republican leaders during his years in office, and look what it got him: an obstructionist Congress eager to torpedo any of his initiatives just to help defeat him in his bid for reelection. If Hillary Clinton appears to be unwilling to let her guard down, it is because she knows--from experience--that her political opponents would distort any possible shortcoming and never forgive any mistake. So, while Mr. Brooks makes some salient points about the qualities of an inspirational leader, he ignores political reality in criticizing Mrs. Clinton for not being more like Pope Francis or Mahatma Gandhi. Yes, Mrs. Clinton has had some ethical lapses in her long career in public service. But the success of her presidency will come down to her judgment during an international crisis, her political skill in advancing her domestic agenda, and and her willingness to continue to speak out against injustice and bigotry. Whether or not she is perceived as "gracious" by political commentators will hardly matter.
4
When half the electorate has sworn not to follow the president anywhere, under any circumstances, any question of leadership is rendered moot. And any column about it meaningless.
Can we expect Mr. Brooks to discuss "followership" some time next week?
Can we expect Mr. Brooks to discuss "followership" some time next week?
5
Trump as neither experience nor graciousness. That would heve been a great column.
4
That "whiff of inhumanity" you speak of...sure it's not the stench of misogyny? No male presidential candidate has ever had to endure the kind of scrutiny and negative media attention Hillary has.
Read this column again with that in mind. Hillary is, and has always been, plenty gracious. If only people would open their minds and take note.
Read this column again with that in mind. Hillary is, and has always been, plenty gracious. If only people would open their minds and take note.
4
Brook sometimes you are gracious and insightful but then, as with this piece you revert to partisan dope. There was no Rose Law Firm scandal, no Whitewater scandal, just trumped up charges by the odious Republican party you support. Donald Trump must be the least tasteful and least gracious public figure ever known but you find some way to attack HRC. Hillary is plenty gracious and so smart and strong that she intimidates small minded men like you. If the American Republic is destroyed by Trump we will have this article as proof that you helped do it. Shame on you
7
Yes, Hillary Clinton is long-in-the-tooth and carries much baggage, and while she may not be gracious as probably rightfully claimed by David Brooks, I wonder what he thinks about Tantrum Trump's graciousness or the complete lack thereof.
2
Rubin:
I guess you don't read Brooks often. He has written much about Trump.
I guess you don't read Brooks often. He has written much about Trump.
1
I thought Hillary was awfully gracious when she exclaimed that a "vast right wing conspiracy" was out to get Bill over the Monica affair. She stuck by her man - and though we wondered why back then - now it's quite clear why she did. Poor Bill - caught with his pants down - literately - even though he in his most utmost sincerity said "I did not have sex with that woman."
Hillary fans want her to be president - I get that. What I cannot understand are the blinders they wear when dealing with Hillary's character. Yes - I know - the Supreme Court ... blah blah blah. Still - be fair and honest Hillary fans - admit that she walks on the knife-edge of truth/lie; and Bill too - no wait, he totally lied about Monica. And that there is something - something! fishy smelling about the Clinton Foundation/donors.
Recall the Nixon election when at least his supporters were truthful when they said "we know he's a crook - but he's our crook" and so vote for Nixon.
Hillary fans want her to be president - I get that. What I cannot understand are the blinders they wear when dealing with Hillary's character. Yes - I know - the Supreme Court ... blah blah blah. Still - be fair and honest Hillary fans - admit that she walks on the knife-edge of truth/lie; and Bill too - no wait, he totally lied about Monica. And that there is something - something! fishy smelling about the Clinton Foundation/donors.
Recall the Nixon election when at least his supporters were truthful when they said "we know he's a crook - but he's our crook" and so vote for Nixon.
1
I regard Secretary Clinton as the epitome of a gracious leader. To be pounded and mocked by the right for 30 years as she has and emerge with her spirit of unity and cheerfulness speaks volumes.
12
Nothing here isn't true, but it is disingenuous. Not too long ago, Mr. Brooks, you wrote about how you will miss the graciousness of Barack Obama. I will too, but I won't miss the constant drip drip drip of criticism of the same man as being weak and indecisive. The fate of certain terrorist monsters notwithstanding. Are graciousness and strength mutually exclusive? Of course not, but you'd never know that by what emanates from the mouths of every Republican leader today - with the one exception, maybe, of Lindsey Graham. I consider myself a gracious person, but in my little world, in my experiences in a long career in a male dominated field and countless hours of volunteer community service in leadership positions, I have learned all too well that the general world often sees graciousness as weakness. Just ask my husband, who witnessed - and experienced - frustration and even rage when the "other guy" (and it's always a guy, by the way) perceives graciousness and humility as weakness and behaves accordingly.
We are electing a president, not a committee chair here. If Clinton were running against a decent human being, her obfuscating behavior would actually matter. But Donald Trump? Really? Where are decent, conservative Republican leaders when we need them? You are worried that Clinton lacks "grace" while we face the chance that the most despicable, ignorant fool ever could win the White House by appealing to the worst in human nature? What in the world are you thinking?
We are electing a president, not a committee chair here. If Clinton were running against a decent human being, her obfuscating behavior would actually matter. But Donald Trump? Really? Where are decent, conservative Republican leaders when we need them? You are worried that Clinton lacks "grace" while we face the chance that the most despicable, ignorant fool ever could win the White House by appealing to the worst in human nature? What in the world are you thinking?
10
You can't think of a President with grace? Try Obama.
17
In all the years and decades of Hillary trashing that the Conservatives in this nation have conducted, in all the months of examination -- nothing, NOTHING of any damage or corruption has been found. Contrast this to the short time that DT has been in the news and Conservatives are falling over themselves to minimize the real breaking of laws in his construction past, the real stiffing of his investors, the cheating his workers of money etc. Republicans have an unmitigated level of chutzpah in using "projection" to slime HC and the Democrats. Where is the evidence for wrong doing? Even if you follow the money, you find that the taxes were paid. Not like DT. Enough already! I am so freakin' bored of this hot air. I turn off this nauseating hate machine. There is no way I would vote for any of these slimers.
14
Mr. Brooks, when will you come to appreciate the steel spine of this brilliant woman? I'm so very tired of the re-hash of scandals that always turn out not to be scandals -- but blown-out-of-proportion human error that would have no lasting effect on the future...except that detractors like little terriers won't let them go!
You want to talk about gracious? How about Clinton's gracious embrace of Obama as the Dem candidate 8 years ago? Most opponents would have made for the seashore and licked their wounds...but she campaigned for her party with vigor and determination.
She is gracious enough for me...but I am most proud of her brilliance and spine of steel! Strong women get stuff done, Mr. Brooks. Get over it.
You want to talk about gracious? How about Clinton's gracious embrace of Obama as the Dem candidate 8 years ago? Most opponents would have made for the seashore and licked their wounds...but she campaigned for her party with vigor and determination.
She is gracious enough for me...but I am most proud of her brilliance and spine of steel! Strong women get stuff done, Mr. Brooks. Get over it.
14
Dwell for a moment on the first word of the second paragraph: "So …"
Think about the thought process it reveals. "Hillary Clinton is very experienced, SO experience must not be enough." The not-very-well hidden premise is, "I must find some way to say something bad about HRC, so …". If this is what passes for intelligent commentary today, we are in serious trouble.
Also, when looking at "lack of graciousness" (which we ought not to be talking about to begin with), who thinks of HRC and not The Donald, probably the least "gracious" human to walk the face of the Earth?
Think about the thought process it reveals. "Hillary Clinton is very experienced, SO experience must not be enough." The not-very-well hidden premise is, "I must find some way to say something bad about HRC, so …". If this is what passes for intelligent commentary today, we are in serious trouble.
Also, when looking at "lack of graciousness" (which we ought not to be talking about to begin with), who thinks of HRC and not The Donald, probably the least "gracious" human to walk the face of the Earth?
11
Hillary doesn't seem to trust us. So, why should we trust her?
1
After the brouhaha that's been the recent electoral cycle and always wishing for a short election season, we're now treated to a closer look at both Trump and Clinton. It seems totally normal to me to recalibrate one's expectation for the future of American leadership, which is what Brooks is after here. As long as America enjoys its dominance in the world and as long as American leaders have something to offer to the American electorate, we must look for and demand more from our President. Competence should be a mere starting point for the confluence of ambition and future vacancies at the top. Brooks has been looking and asking for this for a good long while
11
May I add that the most gracious person under intense ridicule, lies, racism, intolerance, and the list could go on ad nauseum, for the past eight years, has been our President, Mr. Obama. We will miss him for his compassion, for his intellectual brilliance, for his leadership, for his stand-up comedy skills, for his ability to move an audience when he speaks, for his great ability to actually speak in complex, meaningful sentences, which seems to have been an art never acquired by these Republican bozos, and for his grace under pressure of all sorts. I personally could not have lasted one day in the current White House with these clowns in Congress, without opening my mouth and blasting every last one of them as a sorry excuse for a human being, and not fit to be in a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Let's all commit ourselves to do everything possible to get these know-nothings/do-nothings out of office so we can all move on.
8
So, Mr. Brooks, you don't see any grace in Hillary Clinton? I guess you didn't watch her at the Benghazi hearing/inquisition. Ten plus hours of poise and grace while being savaged by the hate crazed Republican committee members.
15
Let us not forget that Donald Trump is the antithesis of graciousness. Even by Republican standards I believe that Clinton would receive at minimum a B- when being judged on her humility and ability to absorb and learn from her mistakes (her ACTUAL mistakes, not those manufactured by the Clinton "Corruption" Fabrication Machine).
Donald Trump - by nearly everyone's judgment, even his supporters - rates an F on graciousness. That's all we need to know...
Donald Trump - by nearly everyone's judgment, even his supporters - rates an F on graciousness. That's all we need to know...
5
Brooks,
Can't you be gracious in acknowledging Obama's grace and leadership?
You seem to have run out of gas on your road to character.
Can't you be gracious in acknowledging Obama's grace and leadership?
You seem to have run out of gas on your road to character.
14
Oh, stop. Clinton is no more the beast that the media portrays than Adam.
2
It is a tragedy that we don't see a single selfless leader whom the people could implicitly trust. Where are the Gandhi’s, Lincolns, and Martin Luther King’s? If we look across the world, we can find a single person who can inspire confidence in their people. What a tragedy, the Americans have to decide between Trump and Clinton and all the articles in US Media are imploring its people to choose between the lesser of the two evils!
Brooks, against the above backdrop, searching a gracious leader would be like searching for a needle in the haystack.
Brooks, against the above backdrop, searching a gracious leader would be like searching for a needle in the haystack.
1
"Clinton scandals are all the same." That is because they are ginned up by the same political opponents from the Drudge Report to Trump. I find that Mrs. Clinton has been extremely gracious in the face of daily attacks from the right including calls for jailing and killing her. Everyday another Trump insult is published unchallenged by the media. Look to the latest hatchet job and the coverage of the Clinton Foundation, which is doing excellent work around the world helping millions of people and doing it ethically and efficiently. Yet Trump is allowed to spew his falsehoods without challenge from the media. Your call for Mrs. Clinton to be more gracious is absurd.
14
"Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness." Unfortunately a climate of spurious investigations does not lend itself to openness and graciousness. It leads to justifiable defensiveness. I can't even remember what the original justification for investigating then-Presidnt Bill Clinton was. Did they find him guilty? No. I haven't forgiven the Repulbicans for creating that freak show. I haven't forgiven the Republicans for the Bengazi investigatons. Nothing there. Emails? Investigated and again nothing. I'm not saying you can't disagree with leader's actions or how they handled situations. But criticism is different than accusation. If you accuse, and you're wrong, you lose. The Republican alligators have been snapping at President Nominee Clinton's heels for many years. They've got nothing and they never will, because in order to judge, you have to get out of swamp.
5
Please tell this to Mitch McConnell and the GOP that refuses to govern just because they lost in a fair and square democratic election.
"You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside. Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness.
It’s tough to surrender control, "
"You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside. Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness.
It’s tough to surrender control, "
5
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad."
Welcome, boys and girls, to Mr. Brooks' neighborhood. The good humor truck will be around any minute, trust me.
In Brooks' world everything is beautiful in its own smug way. In his world, it's all in how you "treat" the world, and if the world is not a "friendly and hopeful place," well then, there is something wrong with you.
It's your fault if you can't find the "good news" in people. And it's your fault that people just can't get enough of stabbing you in the back or slapping your face. Call you hateful names and blame you for your husband's mistakes.
And if these bad people, who are all your fault, keep at it for decades, then some of is bound to stick. Just mention is the evil Rose Law Firm and we know what that means and why it is such an everlasting stain on Clinton's character. Except we don't.
Woe to you if you protest or attempt to call out those bad people, who are your fault. If you say you're a target of a right-wing conspiracy, you're delusional.
Now Clinton has been caught with highly incendiary emails doing favors for friends and friends of friends for which she should go straight to hell without passing Go. Most importantly, she should be publicly shamed. Again.
Yes, in Brooks' neighborhood, there are only "good news" people. That's why, boys and girls, Brooks' party conjured up a thing called Trump.
Welcome, boys and girls, to Mr. Brooks' neighborhood. The good humor truck will be around any minute, trust me.
In Brooks' world everything is beautiful in its own smug way. In his world, it's all in how you "treat" the world, and if the world is not a "friendly and hopeful place," well then, there is something wrong with you.
It's your fault if you can't find the "good news" in people. And it's your fault that people just can't get enough of stabbing you in the back or slapping your face. Call you hateful names and blame you for your husband's mistakes.
And if these bad people, who are all your fault, keep at it for decades, then some of is bound to stick. Just mention is the evil Rose Law Firm and we know what that means and why it is such an everlasting stain on Clinton's character. Except we don't.
Woe to you if you protest or attempt to call out those bad people, who are your fault. If you say you're a target of a right-wing conspiracy, you're delusional.
Now Clinton has been caught with highly incendiary emails doing favors for friends and friends of friends for which she should go straight to hell without passing Go. Most importantly, she should be publicly shamed. Again.
Yes, in Brooks' neighborhood, there are only "good news" people. That's why, boys and girls, Brooks' party conjured up a thing called Trump.
5
Here we go again! Why do we have to be inflicted with these David Brooks op-ed pieces that pine for a perfect past that never existed? If one is looking for graciousness, one should not look to today's Republican Party. They have mercilessly attacked the most gracious President in recent memory, Barack Obama, refusing to work with him on anything, to the detriment of this country and the world. Hillary Clinton has been under attack for the past quarter century by the most ungracious group of liars: the "vast right-wing conspiracy" that is the GOP and its allies. She graciously, yet firmly, stood up to the Benghazi committee's inquisition and made them look like the fools that they are. Graciousness is a two-way street. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. David Brooks needs to wake up to the reality of today's right-wing, white nationalist Republican Party. It is not the party of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, or even Ronald Reagan. It has become the party of the Koch brothers, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Fox News, David Duke and Rush Limbaugh.
7
I'm tired of the assumption that Hillary needs to "come clean." It's a false narrative, and always has been. Millions of dollars (and who knows how much time) have been spent investigating Hillary's "crimes" and yet they have come up with nothing!? Regardless of this fact the permanently suspicious anti Clinton machine rolls on free of facts. Let's face it, being powerful and the most admired woman in the world presents a threat to the status quo, Gracious indeed!
14
Anybody who can work with Tom DeLay to get one of her prioprities into law knows a thing or two about graciouos leadership.
And if you look at what Tom DeLay is spewing now, you know what a challenge that was.
And if you look at what Tom DeLay is spewing now, you know what a challenge that was.
8
Mr Brooks please retread your article. You begin with listing Trumps void of political experience (one sentence) and then proceed to write an entire column on H. Clinton's total lack of grace. If ever there was a human being that was lacking grace it is Trump. His lack of experience (70 years old!) is not the problem, he has NO character because he says and does whatever will get him what he wants. And character is supposed one of your things.
Hillary Clinton has been demonized by the Republicans, as has President Obama, from her early years. That you choose to take your turn by claiming Trump's fault is inexperience (again he is 70 hrs old) but H. Clinton's is a lack of grace is just another round of the same 30 year on going attack. Grace isn't a lack of experience, it's a lack of humor, humility, empathy, and gratitude. Where in that list do you find a Trump?
In a contest of grace, H. Clinton wins hands down.
And the email thing is another excuse for the Republicans to demonize instead of doing their job - govern, for heaven's sake. People keep saying you should just leave the dark side and come to the light. After this ridiculous commentary I realize you might just really like the dark side.
Hillary Clinton has been demonized by the Republicans, as has President Obama, from her early years. That you choose to take your turn by claiming Trump's fault is inexperience (again he is 70 hrs old) but H. Clinton's is a lack of grace is just another round of the same 30 year on going attack. Grace isn't a lack of experience, it's a lack of humor, humility, empathy, and gratitude. Where in that list do you find a Trump?
In a contest of grace, H. Clinton wins hands down.
And the email thing is another excuse for the Republicans to demonize instead of doing their job - govern, for heaven's sake. People keep saying you should just leave the dark side and come to the light. After this ridiculous commentary I realize you might just really like the dark side.
8
Grace is also granted by the listener in the conversation. Is this possible in the political environment of the past 40 years of politics?
Hilary's fundamental problem is that "she is untrustworthy" Complicated details are boiled down to... she lied... or she did not lie. I assert that the context for this discussion is resentment that she and her family are making large amounts of money because of their past (and future) public service. The record that blots out the possibility of grace is.
Initially, she obtained power simply by being married. (should not be for a feminist and that's not right)
Then she obtained power by leveraging her political status to win an election (Simply should not be and that's not right)
The public holds that making money (post sec of state... not to mention her husband and kid) by leveraging this public status is wrong and a character flaw. (Simply should not be... its not right!)
Ergo..." lying" is just evidence of her unacceptable flawed character irrespective of the actual facts and fair minded interpretations.
The public cannot grant her the space much less the grace that you speak of!
Thankfully she remains unstopable. When a space for grace opens for her.... I predict she will take the opportunity to do so.
Hilary's fundamental problem is that "she is untrustworthy" Complicated details are boiled down to... she lied... or she did not lie. I assert that the context for this discussion is resentment that she and her family are making large amounts of money because of their past (and future) public service. The record that blots out the possibility of grace is.
Initially, she obtained power simply by being married. (should not be for a feminist and that's not right)
Then she obtained power by leveraging her political status to win an election (Simply should not be and that's not right)
The public holds that making money (post sec of state... not to mention her husband and kid) by leveraging this public status is wrong and a character flaw. (Simply should not be... its not right!)
Ergo..." lying" is just evidence of her unacceptable flawed character irrespective of the actual facts and fair minded interpretations.
The public cannot grant her the space much less the grace that you speak of!
Thankfully she remains unstopable. When a space for grace opens for her.... I predict she will take the opportunity to do so.
1
But making money by fraud, through bankruptcy, by ripping off workers and contractors and not paying your bills is "the American Way"? Let's see how the rest of the world reacts to this in the possibility we have a Trump administration . . .
2
Grace... Why don't you lead by example. How about you have your staff cull the criticisms of you last year of columns, find where you were wrong (like this column), and you can graciously admit your errors, apologize and CHANGE your position.
Till you do that, columns like this aren't even worthy to be used as toilette paper.
Till you do that, columns like this aren't even worthy to be used as toilette paper.
4
This essay is about the definition of leadership written in the context of the presidential election,... the problem of winning against Trump notwithstanding. The issue is not about getting Hillary elected, but the need for an effective leader in the whitehouse, which the citizens crave for and deserve. The premise holds true beyond the election into next four years when/if clinton is the POTUS.
Yes, I am going to hold my nose and Vote for Hillary knowing very well that there may be a repeat of an ineffective Nixon Presidency... impeachment attempts and the whole 9 yards.
Yes, I am going to hold my nose and Vote for Hillary knowing very well that there may be a repeat of an ineffective Nixon Presidency... impeachment attempts and the whole 9 yards.
1
Don't listen to the graceless.... nice column. Sometimes you put together work that's larger than the sum of it's parts. This one is kinda like that.
1
Mr. Brooks, it's about time you woke up and smelled the ... election. Had you been awake earlier, you would have heard Sen. Sanders making the distinction between experience and wisdom as it applies to H-Rod. Moreover, you seem to miss the point about HRH Hillary's attitude concerning the email business. It isn't the lack of humanity about her campaign, it's the whiff of ENTITLEMENT that surrounds her (and Slick Willy).
Trump can't stay on script and allows great chances for attacking H-Rod go by. She stays on script and the basis for the script is to hide herself from scrutiny. By the way, when was her last press conference, one that she can't control by selecting individual interviewers or talking to the free riders on her campaign vehicles?
If Cruz were the Republican candidate, she would be toast by now.
Trump can't stay on script and allows great chances for attacking H-Rod go by. She stays on script and the basis for the script is to hide herself from scrutiny. By the way, when was her last press conference, one that she can't control by selecting individual interviewers or talking to the free riders on her campaign vehicles?
If Cruz were the Republican candidate, she would be toast by now.
Given that Hillary Clinton has been beset by a pack of snarling curs from the GOP who have invented faux crises like Benghazi and the endless email nonsense, she has shown remarkable poise and grace. After all, she could have followed the example of Saint Ronnie, when he traded arms for hostages, imported cocaine to get cash for the Sandinistas, and simply claimed she "forgot".
9
PAULIEV:
A situation where people working for her lost their lives is a faux crisis to you? Oh right, what difference does it really make.
A situation where people working for her lost their lives is a faux crisis to you? Oh right, what difference does it really make.
I just looked up the definition of gracious: courteous, kind,
pleasant. Said nothing about revealing your inner soul or
admitting mistakes. Hillary Clinton is who she is, and I
like her just fine, and am getting a bit tired of people
droning on about her manner or personality. This column
borders on the banal.
pleasant. Said nothing about revealing your inner soul or
admitting mistakes. Hillary Clinton is who she is, and I
like her just fine, and am getting a bit tired of people
droning on about her manner or personality. This column
borders on the banal.
4
It is almost certain she will show graciousness in victory in November.
But, how will Trump/GOP show in defeat? I predict it will be less than gracious.
Just look at their history in Congress over the last 8 years. A disgrace.
But, how will Trump/GOP show in defeat? I predict it will be less than gracious.
Just look at their history in Congress over the last 8 years. A disgrace.
3
At least Ms. Clinton conducts herself with dignity.
4
So Hillary has experience...but she's not Gandhi. Don't you think you're setting the bar a little too high? If not for this ingrained bias, there would be no contest in this election. The whole of the GOP would vote for her. Nothing she promotes is really radical to this country, though it certainly pushes us left-ward. There will be no up-ending of society, no revolution as the world would see it. Some increased taxes on the wealthy. The security of healthcare for many, possibly better educational opportunities for the young. Only SANITY compared to the insanity coming from Donald Trump.
But. She. Is. Not. Gandhi.
Really?
But. She. Is. Not. Gandhi.
Really?
1
I like and admire Brooks, but he seems to be turning into Alain de Botton. In this most terrible of election cycles (and the outcome is not as certain as some think) I'd like it better if Brooks chose a corner, and fought it with both fists. The time for being reasonable, rational and seeing everyone's point of view is past.
I don't think her being guarded amounts to a lack of graciousness in any way. She's had to defend every good and positive thing she and her husband have done in their 40 years or so in public life from right-wing extremists. They may have made some mistakes along the way, but there is no comparison of the scrutiny they face to what others in public life experience. This whole nonsense with the Clinton foundation is another example -- it's a foundation that does amazing work for god's sake! The crazies in your party have long recognized how politically talented (both in winning elections and governing) the Clintons are and they don't like it because they can't compete. In order to deflect their own inadequacies, they've decided to use try and belittle and diminish the opponent. Guess what, it won't work.
3
I'll assume this was submitted prior to yesterday's speech where Clinton threw undeserving Republican leadership a lifeline to ditch their nominee. She is well within her rights to link them by endorsement yet did not.
David Brooks, you seem to have become this nation's scold.
I am so disappointed in you. Each day, I keep waiting for you to simply endorse her because what else can you honestly do? Are you completely unaware of her quiet actions on behalf of those who can't fend for themselves that have gone on for decades? Are you unaware of the ways she reached across the aisle as a Senator to get things done? You talk about secrets when the best kept secrets have been her gracious and effective actions on behalf of so many in need - and in her humility she didn't need to draw attention to herself while doing these things. I believe you're backed into a corner here and reaching at straws to keep from acknowledging what is obvious to anyone who has actually followed her career - she is a strong, deeply caring, intelligent, and imperfect woman who is still standing in spite of decades of attack. And we will be fortunate to have her as our president in times that demand complex thinking, clear policies, and tenacity beyond belief.
4
This is an excellent piece and I wish that it's suggestions and examples be taken seriously. We can all use a little up lifting. I know I would like someone to talk about how good we have it here in America instead of constantly telling me how bad it is. I want a gracious leader.
1
She needs to get rid of that ugly turquoise pant suit while you're at it
1
Based on the comments I'm reading, this thoughtful and deep opinion wasn't fully understood. No fault of the writer. Just not something that has been experienced by the average person, as it noted. MLK is the perfect example. He was here, but unknown. That is exactly what's wrong with Hillary.
1
MLK was "here, but unknown?" He was hardly "unknown" during his lifetime; and he's remembered as one of the most transformational figures in our history (and perhaps the world's). The same goes for Susan B. Anthony, Ghandi, etc.
These people accomplished great things precisely because they WERE known; and they were known because they refused to "surrender" (as Brooks suggests is necessary to be "gracious").
There's a difference between humbleness and surrendering, and between self-confidence and hubris. Knowing when to temporarily step back from escalating conflict is not the same as permanently surrendering. David mistakes one for the other.
I'm not sure what in particular you think so many people haven't "fully understood" in this column.
And why the fact that Clinton is not unknown (as any politican must be) is so "wrong." As a voter, I'd rather know precisely whom I'm voting for (and accepting their flaws), rather than voting for someone who is unknown; that way, we avoid having buyer's remorse.
These people accomplished great things precisely because they WERE known; and they were known because they refused to "surrender" (as Brooks suggests is necessary to be "gracious").
There's a difference between humbleness and surrendering, and between self-confidence and hubris. Knowing when to temporarily step back from escalating conflict is not the same as permanently surrendering. David mistakes one for the other.
I'm not sure what in particular you think so many people haven't "fully understood" in this column.
And why the fact that Clinton is not unknown (as any politican must be) is so "wrong." As a voter, I'd rather know precisely whom I'm voting for (and accepting their flaws), rather than voting for someone who is unknown; that way, we avoid having buyer's remorse.
1
Perfect example of leadership's limits, that is. How many Orval Faubuses and Lester Maddoxes and Bull Connors were inspired to follow Dr. King?
I appreciate your point of view on many things, Mr Brooks, However not this one.
I have to call a spade a spade here: sexism.
Yes, the world is a very different battleground for men than women. I can only imagine that as a woman politician, one might never truly feel she's won the field of battle, that it is a clear victory. It is that security and clarity that allows for the graciousness you refer to.
It is a sense of male entitlement that would call out Hillary Clinton on this.
Given that politics has been a male dominated sport, shall we say, it is not surprising that you offer no examples of powerful women other than Dorothy Day. I hardly think Dorothy Day' life offers a fair comparison to the life and work of Hillary Clinton.
I once heard the quote that critics are the ones who come down from the ramparts after the battle and shoot the corpses on the battle field.
It is easy to be critical unless you've been in the trenches and know the fog of war. Or to have known what it is like to succeed in a man's world, despite the embedded, constant sexism that scrutinizes every move you make for being unseemly, or ungracious.
I have to call a spade a spade here: sexism.
Yes, the world is a very different battleground for men than women. I can only imagine that as a woman politician, one might never truly feel she's won the field of battle, that it is a clear victory. It is that security and clarity that allows for the graciousness you refer to.
It is a sense of male entitlement that would call out Hillary Clinton on this.
Given that politics has been a male dominated sport, shall we say, it is not surprising that you offer no examples of powerful women other than Dorothy Day. I hardly think Dorothy Day' life offers a fair comparison to the life and work of Hillary Clinton.
I once heard the quote that critics are the ones who come down from the ramparts after the battle and shoot the corpses on the battle field.
It is easy to be critical unless you've been in the trenches and know the fog of war. Or to have known what it is like to succeed in a man's world, despite the embedded, constant sexism that scrutinizes every move you make for being unseemly, or ungracious.
5
"Sooner or later life teaches you that you’re not the center of the universe, nor quite as talented or good as you thought."
"The mistakes just have to be made."
The stories we choose to tell are often tellingly about ourselves, Mr. Brooks.
"The mistakes just have to be made."
The stories we choose to tell are often tellingly about ourselves, Mr. Brooks.
2
This seems to be a very reductionist, black or white view of Hillary Clinton. Here is a woman who has accomplished more in her lifetime through extremely hard work, smarts and dedication than most presidents ever have. She has been attacked because of Bill's misdeeds, and her own. I believe she has remained gracious, adult, and yes "controlled" throughout. When was the last time you heard a male political figure apologize or admit wrong doing that would provide an opening for "enemies" to use against them? Hillary has a public face, and a private face. She is admired and loved by people on both sides of the aisle because of her optimism, intelligence, experience and, yes, grace...particularly under pressure. She has a web of friends, many since childhood, and others who have devoted themselves to her. I believe that Hillary knows what, who and when to let people in. Caution is a characteristic I welcome in a president. Does The Orange One have any real friends? I doubt it. Most likely his children back him only because they are afraid of being cut out of the wealth. Candor in politics is practically non-existent for good reason. It can and will be used against you; particularly if you are Hillary Clinton.
5
You may be right theoretically, but unfortunately, reality of our divided political world is different. Look at Barack Obama, one of the most gracious leaders I've seen. How many times did he stretch out his hands to his opponents, just to be slapped back in the face.? I don't blame Hillary Clinton for always having her guards up. Look at how she has been treated for the past 25 years by her opponents and the media. It is a testimony to her strong character that she is still standing. I am not one of those long term Hillary fans! But as a strong woman who has had positions of responsibility I empathize with her and am disgusted by the way she is treated by the media, and the witch hunt by her opponents.
8
Hillary showed something akin to graciousness when she was in the Senate. She spent time getting to know Senators on both sides of the aisle. She was not a showboat -- quite the opposite. She worked quietly to do her part to help get things done. That could also be her style as president. If so, she'll turn out to be a very good president despite all her flaws.
7
David Brooks' perception of what is gracious comes from white male privilege. No other Presidential candidate in recent memory has been attacked for the non issues as Hillary Clinton has and yet almost every candidate is recent memory has made the same faux pas. Much to do about nothing except David's view of how a woman should behave.
5
Barack Obama has been the perfect example of a gracious leader. So strange that this has evaded David Brooks' attention. He bases his graciousness on actions, not on words, though, the way Brooks does.
1
The only fault you seem to give Trump is his lack of political experince. What about the rest of him? He lacks everything a human being is.
9
The reference to sharp elbows is apt. Hillary has been playing in the political NBA for more than 25 years. She has learned what happens when you open yourself up. You wind up on the floor from the blows of a few hundred Republican elbows and there is no one to cry foul and award free throws. If she has become a little too self protective, she has cause.
9
Both candidates could take a page from Mr. Obama's playbook: be gracious and dignified in the face of adversity. Avoid the temptation to be snarky. Try really hard to work with others, even when they don't want to work with you. Shed a few tears when it is appropriate. Keep your eye on the prize and don't let your temper get the best of you. Have a good sense of humor and let it shine throw.
Sigh. I am going to miss the man.
Sigh. I am going to miss the man.
3
JenD:
I agree that Obama appears more gracious than our present candidates. He didn't look too dignified, though, trying to explain those pallets of cash to Iran. Sigh!
I agree that Obama appears more gracious than our present candidates. He didn't look too dignified, though, trying to explain those pallets of cash to Iran. Sigh!
It was Iran's cash. And we didn't pay interest.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/opinion/the-fake-400-million-iran-rans...
Maybe you should fault the "news" sources you're relying on now. But that would only induce cognitive dissonance. Besides, as Rick Santorum put it, it's fun to bang the president.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/opinion/the-fake-400-million-iran-rans...
Maybe you should fault the "news" sources you're relying on now. But that would only induce cognitive dissonance. Besides, as Rick Santorum put it, it's fun to bang the president.
1
This article - accompanied by a photo of Hillary Clinton - creates the false impression that she is the type of leader mentioned in the headline.
Manipulative.
Manipulative.
I often enjoy David's sociological views but find this article couldn't be more off-base. I'd suggest the next 2 articles David writes are: #1 on selection bias, and #2 on empathy.
Selection bias is when we cherry pick events to fit our own narrative. While Hillary's email issue/response are surprisingly flat-footed, it represents only one of an entire life of public service and policy positions. If you wish to criticize, first choose a broad range of her experiences and positions. Also don't fall for the oldest (usually Republican) trick in the book of buying into every accusation in politics. In other words, see how ALL the facts support/refute your narrative and realize that essentially all the accusations against her have been phony.
#2 - empathy. Put yourself in her shoes. A hypothetical . . . Imagine if the Tea Party invented every 'scandal' imaginable against you. Constantly demonized you and framed every NYT essay or act within some suspicious frame. Then they used those 'scandals' as entry to creep and dig into every other aspect of your life. And imagine this happening constantly over decades. Maybe you'd be more adept at dealing with it than Hillary, but very likely you'd become fairly hardened and defensive, no?
I'm stunned she's held up so well and could argue that's quite a battle test for a president.
Selection bias is when we cherry pick events to fit our own narrative. While Hillary's email issue/response are surprisingly flat-footed, it represents only one of an entire life of public service and policy positions. If you wish to criticize, first choose a broad range of her experiences and positions. Also don't fall for the oldest (usually Republican) trick in the book of buying into every accusation in politics. In other words, see how ALL the facts support/refute your narrative and realize that essentially all the accusations against her have been phony.
#2 - empathy. Put yourself in her shoes. A hypothetical . . . Imagine if the Tea Party invented every 'scandal' imaginable against you. Constantly demonized you and framed every NYT essay or act within some suspicious frame. Then they used those 'scandals' as entry to creep and dig into every other aspect of your life. And imagine this happening constantly over decades. Maybe you'd be more adept at dealing with it than Hillary, but very likely you'd become fairly hardened and defensive, no?
I'm stunned she's held up so well and could argue that's quite a battle test for a president.
2
It find it very strange that David Brooks did not include President Obama in his list of "gracious" leaders, considering that in his February 2016 column entitled "I Miss Barack Obama" [1], he'd included "grace under fire" among the president qualities that he already missed or would miss:
a) basic integrity
b) sense of basic humanity
c) soundness in his decision-making process
d) grace under pressure
e) resilient sense of optimism
From the above, Brooks concluded:
"Obama radiates an ethos of integrity, humanity, good manners and elegance that I’m beginning to miss, and that I suspect we will all miss a bit, regardless of who replaces him." [1]
So, what, Mr. Brooks? President Obama has not changed or been all over the lot like the GOP nominee. He is still the same gracious leader you pined for.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/opinion/i-miss-barack-obama.html?rref=...®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=49&pgtype=collection
a) basic integrity
b) sense of basic humanity
c) soundness in his decision-making process
d) grace under pressure
e) resilient sense of optimism
From the above, Brooks concluded:
"Obama radiates an ethos of integrity, humanity, good manners and elegance that I’m beginning to miss, and that I suspect we will all miss a bit, regardless of who replaces him." [1]
So, what, Mr. Brooks? President Obama has not changed or been all over the lot like the GOP nominee. He is still the same gracious leader you pined for.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/opinion/i-miss-barack-obama.html?rref=...®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=49&pgtype=collection
1
Oh Brooks. Quit whining. Try a little of your own hokey, over-elaborated, graciousness. You just don't like HIllary because she's worked harder, learned more, become tougher, than any of the miserable 16 or 17 GOP dwarves can ever even dream of being. Tougher and more tested, more attacked, more nitpicked -- by suavely trilling trolls like you and rabid, grossly hateful people alike -- and still keeps slogging on with a smile on her face, in heels.
Like so many privileged white men, you claim to have looked forward to the first woman president -- so long as she was the woman of YOUR dreams, of YOUR demands, of YOUR controlling narcissistic fantasies.
Well Hillary is who she is. Not your woman; her own woman. And we are damned lucky to have her. Considering the alternatives -- !
So quit carping and learn a little graciousness. Or are you unable to practice what you preach?
Like so many privileged white men, you claim to have looked forward to the first woman president -- so long as she was the woman of YOUR dreams, of YOUR demands, of YOUR controlling narcissistic fantasies.
Well Hillary is who she is. Not your woman; her own woman. And we are damned lucky to have her. Considering the alternatives -- !
So quit carping and learn a little graciousness. Or are you unable to practice what you preach?
2
Excellent analysis.
Two things come to mind, which stand in tension with each other.
Could Hillary be more gracious?
Einstein said something close to this: "The question I most want to answer is: Is the universe friendly?" Hillary, as you point out, seems to answer No. I often wish she'd lean to Yes.
On the other hand, Jackie Robinson had to swing the pendulum to the extreme, to avoid being viewed as and Angry Black Man. Hillary probably needs to remain tough as nails...even "brittle"...to avoid dismissive stereotyping.
Two things come to mind, which stand in tension with each other.
Could Hillary be more gracious?
Einstein said something close to this: "The question I most want to answer is: Is the universe friendly?" Hillary, as you point out, seems to answer No. I often wish she'd lean to Yes.
On the other hand, Jackie Robinson had to swing the pendulum to the extreme, to avoid being viewed as and Angry Black Man. Hillary probably needs to remain tough as nails...even "brittle"...to avoid dismissive stereotyping.
Seriously! An article about how Hillary should be 'gracious'!
You're either gracious, or your not Mr. Brooks!
Hillary is not.
You're either gracious, or your not Mr. Brooks!
Hillary is not.
2
Wow this really takes the cake! So now "...there's a whiff of inhumanity about her campaign that inspires distrust." What does that even mean? Trump goes about inciting violence and ranting hatred, racism and bigotry on an hourly basis, and this is how conservative mr. brooks describes Hillary Clinton? What's left to criticize about her? Her smile, her laugh. her hair, her clothes, her husband. her daughter, years and years of bashing and crazy, groundless attacks and now she's accused of being inhuman. This so called column is absurd in the extreme and insulting to anyone capable of reading. Perhaps mr. brooks should take his own advice and maybe share it with his fellow Clinton/Obama basher maureen dowd. I guess we thought brooks was at least a reasonable republican but apparently not. Some things never change.
Dear David, don't you think the papers from your college "Philosophy of Life" class are getting a little dated?
2
Mrs. Clinton did not 'interpret' her life as a battlefield. Yes, she has made mistakes and still does. Who was not in the same situation by the age of almost 70?
From the day she became first lady in Arkansas, through her time of First Lady in the White House, and then through elected and appointed office the right has thrown the kitchen sink including the dirty dishes in it at her.
So please, spare us your holier than thou attitude, Mr. Brooks, of what makes a 'gracious' person.
From the day she became first lady in Arkansas, through her time of First Lady in the White House, and then through elected and appointed office the right has thrown the kitchen sink including the dirty dishes in it at her.
So please, spare us your holier than thou attitude, Mr. Brooks, of what makes a 'gracious' person.
9
Sarah:
It's not simply about making mistakes. It's making similar mistakes over and over and about how one reacts to those mistakes. Holier than thou? Not just David.
It's not simply about making mistakes. It's making similar mistakes over and over and about how one reacts to those mistakes. Holier than thou? Not just David.
Some times I have to wonder...why is David Brooks the decider of all things correct or incorrect? Moral or immoral. Does he have a degree in ethics? Sometimes David Brooks doesn't seem very gracious.
2
So tired of the sanctimonious sermons from David Brooks. I'd love to see you try to withstand decades of smears from the right and emerge "gracious" and "transformed". Hillary Clinton has been in a political war for her life from day one. The very fact that she survives speaks of her strength and tenacity. She is not perfect but it is childish to demand perfection from our leaders. Your own second act is now an attempt to make us see how deep you are, how thoughtful. How about taking some responsibility yourself for your own participation in tearing her down over the years? Your own participation in where the Republican Party is taking this country. I'd love to see you be honest, gracious and transformed. Geez....
7
Gracious generals in WWII as gracious? Read some biographies of General MacArthur, David. The ones I've seen describe him as "inflexible and arrogant" and having "malignant narcissism."
10
There is a barrier to authenticity erected around Mrs. Clinton that impedes outreach to the audience. Where Mr. Obama is alloof, postured and Lecterned in his approach, he can display a warmth in his voice and mannerisims that engages and connects with people. Mr. Biden does this effortlessly while Mr. McConnell, Mr. Ryan in Congress appear berift of the warmth that folks wish to see. You want to know that Leaders 'got your back' and have interest and show concern. Mrs. Clinton's guarded approach to Press Conferences, or lack thereof coupled with a phlanx of confidents, Huma, Jake and Cheryl cocooning leaves little room for those on the outside to see the Hillary inside.
1
Mr. Brooks, I have long admired your writing. This piece is an exceptionally eloquent distallation of the concerns many citizens (including lifelong Democrats) have for another Clinton presidency. For a person of such deep experience and intellect, the lack of graciousness and judgment exhibited by Ms. Clinton is terribly discouraging. One despairs the damage done to the public model of civic discourse by a Clinton (or worse still, a Trump) presidency. What happened to leaders of character such as T. Roosevelt, Truman and Eisenhower? Thank you for your excellent work.
A gracious leader is often seen as weak. MLK jr. was experienced, influential, heroic, yet his "dream" has still not become reality. The downtrodden often need more than grace--and--women have been downtrodden since day 1.
1
Brooks like many conservatives can't help but bring up the "Clinton Scandals" over the years. Is it because the Clintons are involved in more scandals or is it that they have been scrutinized by the right so throughly. I am more interested in the scandals lurking on Capitol Hill. All those lobbyists running around providing payola to our Congress is the biggest scandal that investigative reporters never investigate. Lobbying is legalized bribery and should be exposed as such but our press is more interested in scandals and selling news rather than making it.
4
This is to bring to your attention, Mr. Brooks, that you forgot to include -- inadvertently, I'm sure -- the last sentence of your column when you did the cutting and pasting from the first draft into the final article: "As for Barack Obama, I am aware of the egg on my face when I concede that it was against vicious, unrelenting pressure from the Republican opposition that the 44th president maintained grace and poise to earn his place alongside Lincoln and Gandhi when it comes to graceful political leadership."
5
I am sure that Hillary appreciates Brooks suggestions a lot because of the perfection he has achieved in his life. He is the one true thing we read in the New York Times. I bow before the MASTER.
1
Brooks, I liked this column but it was missing an acknowledgment of how Clinton got to be self protective and distrustful- the Republicans who have unfairly and relentlessly attacked her to no end over decades. You argue she ought to acknowledge her mistakes but you don't acknowledge your party's.
2
An on-line reader/scanner would think, based on the headline and the photograph, that Hillary Clinton was the "gracious" leader being praised in the column.
Surely, there's a photo available that would convey a truer sample of the text.
Surely, there's a photo available that would convey a truer sample of the text.
I hope David Brooks reads and absorbs his readers' comments.
Excusing Donald Trump's words and behavior, both of which are inexcusable, as the result of "inexperience" is in itself inexcusable.
Excusing Donald Trump's words and behavior, both of which are inexcusable, as the result of "inexperience" is in itself inexcusable.
7
Obama epitomizes this sort of grace, yet I don't recall DB celebrating him over the years.
9
So how come Trump doesn't get badgered about being gracious? If anyone needs a lesson in humility it is Donald Trump. How come Trump can get away with comments about President Obama's birth, Mexicans, Muslims, Black neighborhoods, and women? And what about those tax returns?
I'm sick of these double standards for women candidates. And I think you will see other voters are too. Just because we aren't the loudest in the room doesn't mean we aren't listening or watching. We know when to speak and we vote.
I'm sick of these double standards for women candidates. And I think you will see other voters are too. Just because we aren't the loudest in the room doesn't mean we aren't listening or watching. We know when to speak and we vote.
6
You have got to be kidding me. We're being offered a choice of someone who would lock down the borders, bankrupt the economy with an idiotic wall, incite hatred in the populace and you're going after Hilary for not being gracious enough?!? Surely you have lost your mind.
6
It is difficult to view your environment as "friendly and hopeful" when your husband was impeached over nothing.
3
Hmmmm.... based just on the title of t his piece ,I thought for sure you'd be describing Barak Obama.
3
I think you are entirely right. Experience is the only way to "wisdom", "graciousness" and "sympathy toward the pain of others". Now, you become a woman politician, attacked for 20 years and you may begin to feel the pain of Ms. Clinton. That being impossible, please imagine yourself being a woman who is the smartest one in a room full of men who believe that women are just not as capable.
4
Two words: President Obama.
6
How can one expect graciousness from Hillary Clinton when she is demonized day after day, with awful schoolyard bully names and chants of "lock her up"? I have met her in a small group, and she was nothing but gracious and a good listener. I think she's doing a remarkable job considering the nastiness emanating from Trump.
10
According to Mr. Brooks, “Gracious leaders create a more gracious environment by greeting the world openly and so end up maximizing their influence and effectiveness.” No doubt this assertion seems reasonable to Mr. Brooks given the gracious and nuanced corner of the opinion/news eco-system he inhabits. In the pages of the New York Times, and on the sets of the PBS News Hour or Meet the Press, people hold serious debates about real policies and ideas. And then there is the overtly conservative media — Fox News, Breitbart, etc. We know what these outlets have done to President Obama for the last eight years, and Hillary Clinton for the last twenty years.
Under the circumstances, Secretary Clinton has been extraordinarily gracious. Mr. Brooks refers to many of history’s greats: Lincoln, King, Gandhi, Mandela, Havel and Day. Though now revered in death, each was often controversial at times. Mr. Brooks also mentions Pope Francis as a current model of graciousness. However, Hillary Clinton is running for the presidency, not the papacy, so it’s hardly appropriate to expect Hillary to meet that standard. Admittedly, with Donald Trump as the Republican nominee, I certainly understand the impulse to aim higher when it comes to graciousness. Still, Mr. Brooks should re-watch, in its entirety, Secretary Clinton’s testimony at the Benghazi hearings in October 2015. She was the epitome of grace under pressure. She is the epitome of what we need in a modern president. I’m with her.
Under the circumstances, Secretary Clinton has been extraordinarily gracious. Mr. Brooks refers to many of history’s greats: Lincoln, King, Gandhi, Mandela, Havel and Day. Though now revered in death, each was often controversial at times. Mr. Brooks also mentions Pope Francis as a current model of graciousness. However, Hillary Clinton is running for the presidency, not the papacy, so it’s hardly appropriate to expect Hillary to meet that standard. Admittedly, with Donald Trump as the Republican nominee, I certainly understand the impulse to aim higher when it comes to graciousness. Still, Mr. Brooks should re-watch, in its entirety, Secretary Clinton’s testimony at the Benghazi hearings in October 2015. She was the epitome of grace under pressure. She is the epitome of what we need in a modern president. I’m with her.
584
I concur there is a basic lack of trust surrounding the Clinton's. Because of this, I really did not want another Clinton in the White House. For one, I am afraid it will tip the election to the other party. That said, there is also truth to the claim that no Republican candidate has had to undergo such close scrutiny as Hilary Clinton. It is not a matter of graciousness in my opinion, but a matter of political fault-finding that keeps these issues constantly in the news stirring up even more fear and lack of trust. What happened to sticking to the issues????
2
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad. You’ll be willing to relinquish control, and in surrender you’ll actually gain more strength as people trust in your candor and come alongside."
No; in the real world, relinquishing control and surrendering leaves oneself open to being taken advantage of (and often worse).
According to the Workplace Bullying Institute, the target of workplace harassment is often:
- a highly skilled skilled worker.
- a role model that other colleagues seek out for guidance.
- empathetic, and possess good social skills.
- ethical, honest.
- candid, yet forthright.
- trusting, guiless.
- non-confrontive (submissive).
According to WBI, these factors don't always lead others to "come alongside." Rather, insecure and jealous coworkers view these traits as a threat, and thus attack them to maintain their own status.
After suffering a breakdown from 8 years of harassment by a colleague (followed by retaliation from HR because I tried to hold them accountable), I once asked my doctor: "Why did they all hate me so much?" "Because you're so intelligent, successful, and you spoke out in a forthright yet unselfish way. You trusted them too much, and left yourself vulnerable."
I've learned that a truly great leader doesn't surrender; rather, they use these skills smartly to RETAIN control over bullies, and press forward in their work for the common good.
No; in the real world, relinquishing control and surrendering leaves oneself open to being taken advantage of (and often worse).
According to the Workplace Bullying Institute, the target of workplace harassment is often:
- a highly skilled skilled worker.
- a role model that other colleagues seek out for guidance.
- empathetic, and possess good social skills.
- ethical, honest.
- candid, yet forthright.
- trusting, guiless.
- non-confrontive (submissive).
According to WBI, these factors don't always lead others to "come alongside." Rather, insecure and jealous coworkers view these traits as a threat, and thus attack them to maintain their own status.
After suffering a breakdown from 8 years of harassment by a colleague (followed by retaliation from HR because I tried to hold them accountable), I once asked my doctor: "Why did they all hate me so much?" "Because you're so intelligent, successful, and you spoke out in a forthright yet unselfish way. You trusted them too much, and left yourself vulnerable."
I've learned that a truly great leader doesn't surrender; rather, they use these skills smartly to RETAIN control over bullies, and press forward in their work for the common good.
3
"The gracious people one sees in life and reads about in history books -- "
You see David, we have read your columns over the past 18 months -- collectivley a book on recent history -- in which you tried your utmost and time and again to put forth arguments about how this and that ungracious and vacuous GOP candidate in combination with another even more ungracious and totally despicable one would make a great ticket for your party.
Was it Rubio - Fiorina (whose vitriol incited the Planned Parenthood murder)? Or was it Cruz and one of the other ungracious bozos?
Please let us know what history book characters served as your guide for those selections.
You see David, we have read your columns over the past 18 months -- collectivley a book on recent history -- in which you tried your utmost and time and again to put forth arguments about how this and that ungracious and vacuous GOP candidate in combination with another even more ungracious and totally despicable one would make a great ticket for your party.
Was it Rubio - Fiorina (whose vitriol incited the Planned Parenthood murder)? Or was it Cruz and one of the other ungracious bozos?
Please let us know what history book characters served as your guide for those selections.
7
Just a question for the so-called 'journalist'.
Would you write the same condescending, sanctimonious, totally asinine behavioral advice for a MALE candidate for the presidency of the United States?
Shame on you. Go teach yourself some manners. Look at your OWN flaws from 30 years ago, and teach yourself how to act. Then, you go ahead and run for public office. Be subject to the most brutal scrutiny for half of your life. If, and when you can actually be at the same level of Hillary Clinton, then you can go ahead and pontify about her 'transformation' into what YOU think she should be, according to your measure.
Then. ask yourself if you would write the exact same garbage about Jimmy Carter, or Ronald Reagan, or George Bush, or Bill Clinton.
Please, do NOT answer.
Would you write the same condescending, sanctimonious, totally asinine behavioral advice for a MALE candidate for the presidency of the United States?
Shame on you. Go teach yourself some manners. Look at your OWN flaws from 30 years ago, and teach yourself how to act. Then, you go ahead and run for public office. Be subject to the most brutal scrutiny for half of your life. If, and when you can actually be at the same level of Hillary Clinton, then you can go ahead and pontify about her 'transformation' into what YOU think she should be, according to your measure.
Then. ask yourself if you would write the exact same garbage about Jimmy Carter, or Ronald Reagan, or George Bush, or Bill Clinton.
Please, do NOT answer.
11
E Delgado:
It's his column, not yours. And what gracious person says don't answer to another?
It's his column, not yours. And what gracious person says don't answer to another?
It's time for people to get over Hillary's imperfections and realize that, at her worst, she will not cause the kinds of disruptions to our civil discourse, and indeed, to the "live-and-let-live" ethos to which most Americans subscribe, that are certain to accompany a Trump administration.
Trump will certainly unleash every dis-credited and divisive bully-boy (Guiliani, Christie, Palladino, to name a few) on an already over-heated political atmosphere. Every White Supremacist and lone wolf avenger with a gun will be empowered to desperation in the ensuing chaos. And unfortunately that applies to the same elements in our police departments (remember "Guiliani-time"?)
While a Joe Biden, or even a John MaCaine certainly possess the qualities of character David Brooks admires--they aren't running.
She is. And those voters in snit about her character-flaws and dour personality need to get over it and turn away the barbarians at the gate.
Trump will certainly unleash every dis-credited and divisive bully-boy (Guiliani, Christie, Palladino, to name a few) on an already over-heated political atmosphere. Every White Supremacist and lone wolf avenger with a gun will be empowered to desperation in the ensuing chaos. And unfortunately that applies to the same elements in our police departments (remember "Guiliani-time"?)
While a Joe Biden, or even a John MaCaine certainly possess the qualities of character David Brooks admires--they aren't running.
She is. And those voters in snit about her character-flaws and dour personality need to get over it and turn away the barbarians at the gate.
5
Not a gracious column. Biased and hypocritical. As many of the comments attest.
10
And, of course, the comments are always right.
Much of the time the comments are informed and informative. They are almost always literate. Occasionally they are witty and or LOL humorous. Without fail I enjoy them and think the cogently expressed views of the readership add value to the paper.
1
Mr. Brooks perpetuates the "media image" of Mrs. Clinton - a woman suspect, a woman lacking of openness, a woman that can't be trusted. It began with her being politically active during her "First Lady" years in the White House. Rather than give teas and be the White House hostess, she pursued a political agenda unlike any woman in the White House had ever done. For this outrageous act she was attacked by Republicans, conservatives, and anyone else that thought a woman's place was in the home cooking, cleaning, and taking care of her man. The tags attached to Mrs. Clinton then are the same ones being used by the Republicans and media today. Mr. Brooks has condensed all those tags down to "lack of graciousness", as if that says it all. Oh, he does give her credit for having "experience", but then erases that acknowledgement by implying without graciousness, it's just not enough. I'll take Mrs. Clinton's experience over Mr. Trumps graciousness any day.
2
When I saw the title of Mr. Brooks' column, I immediately thought he was finally giving President Obama the praise he deserves for his calm, classiness as a great leader.
What he did, however, was to describe qualities that the President has consistently demonstrated, yet gave him absolutely no mention.
What he did, however, was to describe qualities that the President has consistently demonstrated, yet gave him absolutely no mention.
6
Miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles better then Trump!
5
Never a surprise from Brooks. Boring, predictable. It would compliment my coffee and start me on my day with a jolt if for once Brooks might buck the cliche, stray from the predetermined narrative and acknowledge that Hillary Clinton, compared to her peers in politics, demonstrates passion and compassion on the stump.
Hey, political junkies, take a fresh look. Stop buying into the narrative that has been so carefully, methodically and relentlessly promoted for 20+ years. Watch Hillary with open eyes and an open mind. Do not apply the labels you have been programmed to bias your perceptions with at the suggestion of her name. Just slow down, clear your thoughts and listen.
Brooks, take a walk in the park and clear your mind before you write your next piece. Look at the world around you. Reexamine your motivations. Imagine a candidate with all the experience of Hillary Clinton, read transcripts of her speeches and multiple testimonies imagine for a moment as Politician X. Anonymize Hillary as if participating in a bias eradication experiment, and decide anew, should I support this professional and endorse her over a similarly analyzed opponent?
Please. Stop being so boring.
Hey, political junkies, take a fresh look. Stop buying into the narrative that has been so carefully, methodically and relentlessly promoted for 20+ years. Watch Hillary with open eyes and an open mind. Do not apply the labels you have been programmed to bias your perceptions with at the suggestion of her name. Just slow down, clear your thoughts and listen.
Brooks, take a walk in the park and clear your mind before you write your next piece. Look at the world around you. Reexamine your motivations. Imagine a candidate with all the experience of Hillary Clinton, read transcripts of her speeches and multiple testimonies imagine for a moment as Politician X. Anonymize Hillary as if participating in a bias eradication experiment, and decide anew, should I support this professional and endorse her over a similarly analyzed opponent?
Please. Stop being so boring.
2
And as Trump refuses to disclose his tax returns the ignorance and calumny against Hillary continues, blasting from every GOP media outlet and snookered Republican partisan.
3
Inspiring. I hope she reads this.
1
The most gracious leader we have had in decades in Barack Obama. He is all those things described in David's article. However, not mentioned.
10
Ah, yes. Lord Brooks with his moral platitudes neglects to look at the type of "leadership" in his own party.
His GOP is the most rancorous, opportunistic, obstructionist, self-aggrandizing pack of frauds perhaps to ever sit in Congress.
For a party with no "graciousness" PERIOD, it's odd that he would single out Mrs. Clinton for an article like this.
The mirror, Lord Brooks—it beckons to you and yours.
You'd do for some reservation.
His GOP is the most rancorous, opportunistic, obstructionist, self-aggrandizing pack of frauds perhaps to ever sit in Congress.
For a party with no "graciousness" PERIOD, it's odd that he would single out Mrs. Clinton for an article like this.
The mirror, Lord Brooks—it beckons to you and yours.
You'd do for some reservation.
2
Brooks' logic seems to be that if Clinton has been attacked relentlessly it must be because she *must* have done something.
It's the same logic I heard from a guy I served with in the military when he found out I was Jewish. "If Jews have been persecuted for so long -- he said -- it must be because they *must* have done something wrong."
It's the same logic I heard from a guy I served with in the military when he found out I was Jewish. "If Jews have been persecuted for so long -- he said -- it must be because they *must* have done something wrong."
5
Hillary Clinton doesn't have to be Barack Obama. With his grace, intelligence, and thoughtfulness, he tried to lift all of us for eight years but we weren't interested. You say America is desperate for a little uplift? Hardly--we had it and spurned it.
Hillary Clinton is more than smart enough and more than experienced enough to do the job and do it well. That's good enough for me. And she can be as brittle and combative as she's inclined to be while she's doing it. If that's her personality, so be it. I'm voting for a President, not someone I'd like to invite over for BBQ.
Hillary Clinton is more than smart enough and more than experienced enough to do the job and do it well. That's good enough for me. And she can be as brittle and combative as she's inclined to be while she's doing it. If that's her personality, so be it. I'm voting for a President, not someone I'd like to invite over for BBQ.
808
Actually I would be happy tohave the first woman president over for a BBQ. Great laugh that I hope we hear more of.
3
The Clinton scandals follow the same process. Republicans call them names, create horrible rumors about them, the rumors become unconditional facts, the investigations starts, followed by probes and press leaks, each personal attacks fill the news cycle until the general public becomes board with them. The cycle repeats itself again and again and again.
Just think how gracious America would be if only the Republicans actually did their jobs. Like select judges, care for your public lands, and worked on gun control.
Just think how gracious America would be if only the Republicans actually did their jobs. Like select judges, care for your public lands, and worked on gun control.
15
Another twist and turn by David Brooks to fit the world into his narrow view. Stop already. That you could not mention our current President in this screed, says it all. I'm done.
9
HRC and her avid supporters seem to be of the opinion that America owes her the Presidency, because of her qualifications and experience and potentially historic role as first woman President.
The humility doesn't seem to be there, the sense of "Gee I'm lucky to be here and to have a shot at this opportunity to serve, and if you all will let me serve as your President, I promise I will do my best day and night to not let you down."
Instead it's "There's something wrong with you if you don't support Hillary".
She's competent and will do a fine job as President, but if she and her team could find a way to a more reasonable message in this regard, it would eliminate a good amount of the instinctive dislike they get from people.
The humility doesn't seem to be there, the sense of "Gee I'm lucky to be here and to have a shot at this opportunity to serve, and if you all will let me serve as your President, I promise I will do my best day and night to not let you down."
Instead it's "There's something wrong with you if you don't support Hillary".
She's competent and will do a fine job as President, but if she and her team could find a way to a more reasonable message in this regard, it would eliminate a good amount of the instinctive dislike they get from people.
1
It's as easy for Clinton to trust the American people with greater openness as it is for a punching bag to trust a boxer.
This article is directed at the wrong target: the American voters should eschew the implanted memories from years of slurs, mud and Republican vitriol, and they should trust Clinton. Then they will deserve the leader they will get.
This article is directed at the wrong target: the American voters should eschew the implanted memories from years of slurs, mud and Republican vitriol, and they should trust Clinton. Then they will deserve the leader they will get.
9
The most gracious thing, just about the only gracious thing, so far in this election season was Senator Sanders saying "I don't want to talk about your emails!" while debating Ms. Clinton.
We missed a chance to have a real human, a mensch, as our Executive. Too bad for us.
We missed a chance to have a real human, a mensch, as our Executive. Too bad for us.
1
The Republican attacks are so absurd and at the same time so relentless that I don't see how any Democratic candidate would adopt the strategy suggested by Brooks. Clinton is an "open book" compared to Trump. You have access to her taxes, her appointments and her emails. You don't have any of this from Trump. So what does this access get you? Well, you have members of the press arguing that Clinton was engaging in pay to play with respect to the Clinton Foundation. My God, the Clinton Foundation is a charity improving the lives of millions of people. Clinton gets no financial benefit from it. And members of the press treat this like a high crime?
Trump, on the other hand, reveals little. His only available tax return is from long ago and reveals that Trump claims to have had no net income and therefore should pay no tax. Trump's current business is a family affair that is not required to provide financial disclosure. Trump's only public business DJT corporation, lost 90% of its value to shareholders who invested in it. Trump, however, made money on it, as he has repeated bragged while on the campaign trail.
My observation is that the news media expect nothing from Trump because he expects nothing of himself while they expect perfection from Clinton. Try to imagine that kind of news coverage of your life and think you graceful and open you would be about it.
Trump, on the other hand, reveals little. His only available tax return is from long ago and reveals that Trump claims to have had no net income and therefore should pay no tax. Trump's current business is a family affair that is not required to provide financial disclosure. Trump's only public business DJT corporation, lost 90% of its value to shareholders who invested in it. Trump, however, made money on it, as he has repeated bragged while on the campaign trail.
My observation is that the news media expect nothing from Trump because he expects nothing of himself while they expect perfection from Clinton. Try to imagine that kind of news coverage of your life and think you graceful and open you would be about it.
14
Right. The woman candidate should be "gracious," allowed to show only "a gentle strength."
Barack Obama was the most gracious President I've seen in my long lifetime. What good did it do? The Republicans and the right-wing media have viciously attacked and obstructed him every day he has been in office.
Of course Hillary Clinton interprets her life "as a battlefield." For more than 20 years, the forces of partisan hatred have made her life exactly that. She's merely being realistic when she sees it that way. It's human to want to defend yourself.
But Hillary is not allowed to be human, is she? In the fantasizing mind of David Brooks, she must be some kind of saint like Dorothy Day or Ghandi before she can be respected.
Barack Obama was the most gracious President I've seen in my long lifetime. What good did it do? The Republicans and the right-wing media have viciously attacked and obstructed him every day he has been in office.
Of course Hillary Clinton interprets her life "as a battlefield." For more than 20 years, the forces of partisan hatred have made her life exactly that. She's merely being realistic when she sees it that way. It's human to want to defend yourself.
But Hillary is not allowed to be human, is she? In the fantasizing mind of David Brooks, she must be some kind of saint like Dorothy Day or Ghandi before she can be respected.
16
Mr. Brooks, I am not sure that you have the grace to admit it. You are exactly describing President Obama, gracious leadership.
12
If you are looking for the type of person that Mr. Brooks is describing, look no further than Barack Obama. It will be a long time before we have another leader of this character and grace.
11
Brooks sounds like the guy who borrowed $5000 from me two years ago (for 6 months) and never returned it. And now he is annoyed and preachy, giving me lessons about the tone of my emails.
13
Dsvid Brooks - in your "The Art of Gracious Leadership" piece today, it is glaringly obvious that your Republican candidate for the Presidency, Donald Trump, hasn't a shred of gracious leadership in his loud carney-barker, narcissistic, bigoted personality, and never will have. Put that in your calumet and smoke it.
10
The public Hillary is indeed a bit brittle, and David's description of her frequent lack of complete candor is quite accurate. As you might say, she's no Barrack Obama. But I'm hopeful that she will grow in office.
2
I agree, Mr. Brooks. While there are a ton of great reasons to vote for Hillary Clinton, her graciousness is not one. And thanks for your thoughtful insights throughout this ugly campaign - its so easy to get off track and caught up in the vitriol, and your column brings a distance, yet, somehow, a humanness to it all. Cheers, D
4
In order to define her suppose lack of graciousness, one might do well by looking at and listening to her opposition.
Do you fault Mr Trump for us complete and utter lack of graciousness? If so, why not?
Do you fault Mr Trump for us complete and utter lack of graciousness? If so, why not?
Mr. Brooks, you left out one glaring point:
The current Republican party lacks grace.
Here are some prime examples:
"You lie." (Rep.Joe Wilson)
"Palling around with terrorists." (Sarah Palin)
"We should pray like Psalm 109:8 says. It says let his days be few and let another have his office.” (Senator Perdue)
"Obama doesn't have a birth certificate. He may have one, but there's something on that, maybe religion, maybe it says he is a Muslim. I don't know. Maybe he doesn't want that." (Donald Trump)
Speaker Boehner refuses speech date request, September 2011. There is not another instance where a President of the United States requested a date to address Congress and was refused.
“Our top political priority over the next two years should be to deny President Obama a second term,” GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell publicly announces his top political priority, Dec. 2010.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer puts her finger in the President’s face, January 2012.
Marilyn Davenport, an elected member of the CA Orange County Republican central committee, sent an e-mail to friends and acquaintances in 2011. The "family photo" featured Obama as a baby chimpanzee with two chimp parents. Along with the offensive image was the tagline "Now you know why -- No birth certificate."
There are so many, many more examples of disrespect shown by Republicans towards President Obama.
Yet, somehow, you forgot to mention President Obama in your column on gracious leadership. I wonder why?
The current Republican party lacks grace.
Here are some prime examples:
"You lie." (Rep.Joe Wilson)
"Palling around with terrorists." (Sarah Palin)
"We should pray like Psalm 109:8 says. It says let his days be few and let another have his office.” (Senator Perdue)
"Obama doesn't have a birth certificate. He may have one, but there's something on that, maybe religion, maybe it says he is a Muslim. I don't know. Maybe he doesn't want that." (Donald Trump)
Speaker Boehner refuses speech date request, September 2011. There is not another instance where a President of the United States requested a date to address Congress and was refused.
“Our top political priority over the next two years should be to deny President Obama a second term,” GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell publicly announces his top political priority, Dec. 2010.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer puts her finger in the President’s face, January 2012.
Marilyn Davenport, an elected member of the CA Orange County Republican central committee, sent an e-mail to friends and acquaintances in 2011. The "family photo" featured Obama as a baby chimpanzee with two chimp parents. Along with the offensive image was the tagline "Now you know why -- No birth certificate."
There are so many, many more examples of disrespect shown by Republicans towards President Obama.
Yet, somehow, you forgot to mention President Obama in your column on gracious leadership. I wonder why?
25
I (and many others) do not think one needs to be an unethical, experienced politician. Look at Obama: people said he would surround himself with the best people. True, that did not work but anyone else could try it. We need a person who thinks differently and is not a "political player." Business people and engineers think analytically and that is greatly lacking in U.S. politics. There is no longer any return on any investment in the U.S.
11
Neither one of those types should run the country! I would argue strenuously that business people think analytically, very rarely. And the goals of government have anyway very little to do with the goals of business. What is "efficient" in business would be disastrous in government. Efficiency is not the primary goal of government nor should it be.
As for engineers, their grasp of the world is so myopic, so detached that it would be terrifying to put them in charge. What they don't get about human nature, about priorities and communication is vast oceans. Getting them to understand that lack of knowledge almost impossible. If you don't have someone who can translate their worldview to everyone else in a company, there are real problems.
As for engineers, their grasp of the world is so myopic, so detached that it would be terrifying to put them in charge. What they don't get about human nature, about priorities and communication is vast oceans. Getting them to understand that lack of knowledge almost impossible. If you don't have someone who can translate their worldview to everyone else in a company, there are real problems.
1
This statement makes absolutely no sense. What, exactly, does a "return on any investment" mean? Financially? Militarily? Ethically? Jimmy Carter was an engineer, as was Herbert Hoover. Yet both were one-term presidents. Voters quickly realized that presidents need more than analytical thinking to run a country.
No reform on investment in the U.S.? Have you heard of the EpiPen?
1
From Lincoln's second inaugural address: With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
Now that's gracious leadership. Had he not been assassinated America might have been a more gracious and kinder place today. But he was and the GOP took in the Dixiecrats who had no intention of making peace with the fact that African Americans are full citizens of this country. This election is not about Clinton as much as it's about the failure of one party to accept the leadership of another because the person in the White House isn't the right color. The next person may not be the right gender. Are they going to continue their unseemly display of bigotry, sexism, and stupidity or will they get down to the business of governing? That would be the gracious thing to do. It's also "what you do".
Now that's gracious leadership. Had he not been assassinated America might have been a more gracious and kinder place today. But he was and the GOP took in the Dixiecrats who had no intention of making peace with the fact that African Americans are full citizens of this country. This election is not about Clinton as much as it's about the failure of one party to accept the leadership of another because the person in the White House isn't the right color. The next person may not be the right gender. Are they going to continue their unseemly display of bigotry, sexism, and stupidity or will they get down to the business of governing? That would be the gracious thing to do. It's also "what you do".
4
Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton's treatment of the bogus e-mail and Benghazi "scandals" have been gracious beyond words, Mr. Brooks. Of course, she's a woman and you will never give her the praise she deserves. A pity.
21
The opposite of graciousness is ungrateful. The Clinton's repaid black and poor voters who got Bill elected with more incarcerations, and the labor unions with trade deals that export US jobs for the benefit of big corporations. Hillary is going to betray the progressives who voted for her (she doesn't see them holding their noses!). Oh yes, she will get elected, but I predict that she will show her gratitude to them with TPP, more fracking more favors to Wall St. and military intervention in Syria.
1
Mr. Chin Wu: I think you articulated the situation extremely well, the only thing perhaps left out is The Clintons and their foundations will pack in a few more billion after her four year term is up. If ever the phrase "a tiger doesn't change its stripes" is appropropriate it should apply to the Clintons, but no one is really paying attention anyway, it's all about thirty second sound bites and super pacs. Real quick, who are Victoria Nuland, Michele Fluornoy and Robert Kagan, didn't think do, you'll find out soon enough. Hopefully their are more Mr. Chins out there who are paying attention. Thank you Mr.Chin!
1
"Clinton scandals are all the same. There’s an act of unseemly but not felonious behavior, then the futile drawn-out withholding of information, and forever after the unwillingness to ever come clean."
That's what's so infuriating, and has been for decades now.
Hillary could be a great President, especially if she gets a Democratic Congress. And she should thank her lucky stars that she gets to run against a lunatic.
That's what's so infuriating, and has been for decades now.
Hillary could be a great President, especially if she gets a Democratic Congress. And she should thank her lucky stars that she gets to run against a lunatic.
What you're observing, in my view, is an example of what many Americans see in their workplaces everyday -- women who believe that in order to succeed in a man's world they must be tougher, play the game harder than the boys. There are, of course, men who operate on the "play-hard-give-no-quarter" principle. But in my experience, many, many successful women do in fact see their daily professional world as a battlefield, a place where graciousness will not be interpreted as authenticity, but rather as weakness.
I'm betting Mrs. Clinton believes that Americans may think they want a kindly grandmother in the White House, but what they really want and will vote for is an Iron Lady.
I'm betting Mrs. Clinton believes that Americans may think they want a kindly grandmother in the White House, but what they really want and will vote for is an Iron Lady.
4
Let's just stop at "experienced." That's enough for the leader of the nation, and Hillary Clinton has, as President Obama observed, more and better experience than any previous candidate for the office. No one, including you, Mr. Brooks, could withstand the scrutiny Mrs. Clinton has endured over decades, and come out unscathed and gracious.
The other candidate has no experience, has a much less trustworthy past, and has demonstrated none of the traits that will inspire confidence in his ability to rise to the challenges of leadership.
The other candidate has no experience, has a much less trustworthy past, and has demonstrated none of the traits that will inspire confidence in his ability to rise to the challenges of leadership.
6
She didn't fool us the first time, David. What makes you think we will be fooled a second time?
This woman has had ample opportunity to learn gracious leadership. But she is faulted with an absence of grace. She is not gracious to others. Look it up! No, it's never too late to learn. But, we have seen no indication she ever will.
Yes, Trump is worse. But, less so to many voters who detest Hillary. This election may be closer than you think. Personally, I hope that the electorate will vote for non-major parties or write in the name of a gracious leader.
If we could get 40% of the electorate to do that, and the two major party candidates got 30% each. it would send a clarion call heard round the world; We will not suffer incapable, ungracious candidates.
This woman has had ample opportunity to learn gracious leadership. But she is faulted with an absence of grace. She is not gracious to others. Look it up! No, it's never too late to learn. But, we have seen no indication she ever will.
Yes, Trump is worse. But, less so to many voters who detest Hillary. This election may be closer than you think. Personally, I hope that the electorate will vote for non-major parties or write in the name of a gracious leader.
If we could get 40% of the electorate to do that, and the two major party candidates got 30% each. it would send a clarion call heard round the world; We will not suffer incapable, ungracious candidates.
1
She is tough, driven by ambition, strong and fierce in the public sector. So what I say. Sure she has made some mistakes and blunders. Tell me who in life hasn't made wrong decisions. I truely believe she deeply loves and respects her country and all it's citizens.
1
Misogyny is like acid and it leaves a wound that never truly heals. Mr. Brooks will never experience the raw humiliation women often suffer long before they mature. Hillary Clinton is flawed and it shows, perhaps in understanding her we can become better acquainted with ourselves. We live in an age of media predators and have yet to decide what to do about it. Hillary Clinton has no choice but to shield herself from these predators. Her methods are sometimes troubling but how long could most of us tolerate what Mrs. Clinton experiences most days?
9
I do appreciate Mr. Brook's ongoing study of character in public life. It illuminates many of the more repugnant aspects of public and political life today. With his "pen," some of these less noble characteristics of our public figures are construed in a way that can inspire each of us to live better private lives.
2
I'm a Democrat, but there is some truth here. The instinctive reaction of both Clintons to criticisms or questions seems to be to hunker down and deny, deny, deny. It plays right into their enemies' hands.
1
I think Brooks pretty much nailed it here. I am voting for Clinton and have very few differences with her on policy issues. But I do believe that her personal judgment and instincts have been tainted by the many years she has spent under intense scrutiny. It's totally understandable that she would react the way she has and close herself off after everything that she has faced - most of us would probably do the same or at least be tempted to, and if I were her, I would had to leave the spotlight long ago for the sake of my own sanity - but it also is a liability for her as a candidate and as president. The best leaders know their own weaknesses, and I am not yet convinced that she admits to this liability and is taking steps to overcome it.
1
I think the email issue is far less important than other things.
a) Destabilizing Libya and Clinton clapping her hands when Gaddafi was killed.
The result is a Middle East which is a total mess (and Democrats keep blaming Bush even though Iraq, which Bush invaded, is several hundred miles from Libya).
b) Not minding our business in Ukraine and creating a totally unnecessary enmity with Russia. The last thing we need is to quarrel with a country which has 1900 nuclear weapons at the ready - and could easily give half a dozen to Iran if they wanted to make mischief.
Trump has very serious faults and I cannot support him. But the alternative is not all that great.
a) Destabilizing Libya and Clinton clapping her hands when Gaddafi was killed.
The result is a Middle East which is a total mess (and Democrats keep blaming Bush even though Iraq, which Bush invaded, is several hundred miles from Libya).
b) Not minding our business in Ukraine and creating a totally unnecessary enmity with Russia. The last thing we need is to quarrel with a country which has 1900 nuclear weapons at the ready - and could easily give half a dozen to Iran if they wanted to make mischief.
Trump has very serious faults and I cannot support him. But the alternative is not all that great.
2
Ludwig, go back to do some research! Bush Jr reduced funding to those very embassies, exacerbating the problem in Libya! The Ambassador had pleaded many times for a better location, fell on deaf ears, even State Dept, confirms the bad location! Amid terrorists! By the way, 60 Americans died because of Bush Jr policy & the reduction of funds to embassies worldwide.
1
Save this until after the election. While it's starting to look more like a shoo-in at ten points, we are not there yet. How should journalists have acted with balance after 1933 when the brown shirts were in rampage, as Hitler's party gained power? Did many then imagine the industrial scale of tragedy that followed? Things like this can happen anywhere, any time, as more and more events potentially happen in world scale. That's why we study history. Unfortunately, human nature continues to blossom forth. This election is scary to me.
David's piece was the first Friday Times article I wanted to read, because I wanted to know about a better possible world, but when extreme risk is present, best to be careful when the margins are not yet assured.
David's piece was the first Friday Times article I wanted to read, because I wanted to know about a better possible world, but when extreme risk is present, best to be careful when the margins are not yet assured.
1
The difficulty with discovering graciousness is that it also requires discovering grace, which entails an understanding of forgiveness. And we all know that, while to err is human, to forgive is contrary to policy.
1
Hillary Clinton doesn't "interpret" her life as a battlefield. It IS a battlefield. For decades she has been attacked and battled by right-wing individuals and groups that don't agree with her mature and gracious center-left positions. She has to battle if she is to maintain her position as a viable candidate for public service. To be candid, most of Hillary's detractors, including David Brooks, speak primarily from a position of envy. She and Bill have almost always succeeded at winning, and that just sticks in the craw of a lot of people. It's hard being the brightest person in the room. A lot of people don't like success on the part of others. Especially when those persons are women or members of a minority group.
14
Adding to cause for lack of grace must surely be Sec Clinton's frustration that she is continually accused of--and the press continually blathers on about--stuff of which she is NOT even "whiffily" (to use Brooks term) guilty. The blather encircles us all--again and again--even though we know we are being encircled and resent it.
14
Hillary Clinton may be defensive when it comes to the criticism she has had to face over a long political career. But who among us would not be, given the nature and relentlessness of those who accuse her of everything from murder to treason, and then cheer at a national convention of a major political party, "lock her up."
Remember the attack on the Whitewater land deal that lasted 5 years and morphed into the impeachment of her husband for lying about a sexual indiscretion.
While she may have been overly defensive about the use of personal e-mails, her attackers cried treason. Remember, she used personal e-mails for 4 years without her boss, the NSA, the CIA or the FBI raising a question. Remember, the three e-mails with a minor classification notation that slipped through among the 50,000 reviewed by the FBI were about scheduling a meeting. Remember that the identity of no agent was disclosed, no operation hindered, no one hurt, no lives lost.
Mr. Brooks wants "gracious leadership." Then treat leaders fairly and with respect.
Remember the attack on the Whitewater land deal that lasted 5 years and morphed into the impeachment of her husband for lying about a sexual indiscretion.
While she may have been overly defensive about the use of personal e-mails, her attackers cried treason. Remember, she used personal e-mails for 4 years without her boss, the NSA, the CIA or the FBI raising a question. Remember, the three e-mails with a minor classification notation that slipped through among the 50,000 reviewed by the FBI were about scheduling a meeting. Remember that the identity of no agent was disclosed, no operation hindered, no one hurt, no lives lost.
Mr. Brooks wants "gracious leadership." Then treat leaders fairly and with respect.
12
One wonders if a columnist reads these comments, if only to gauge the temperature in the civic room. I suspect Mr. Brooks would be shocked at the hostile tone so many have taken here, perhaps a product of the hypervigilance today's politics demand. Readers' comments to the contrary notwithstanding, this is a wonderful musing on a character trait in too short supply: emotional intelligence. It's the answer to the recurring question dogging Secretary Clinton for decades: How can someone so bright, poised, and experienced sound so wooden and inauthentic to an electorate that desperately wants to embrace her?
Mr. Brooks is correct that it is never too late for Hillary Clinton to learn and to gain a measure of graciousness, but I am sorry to say that he is engaging in wishful thinking when he suggests that she will suddenly become more open and trustworthy. Hillary Clinton, I believe has learned over the past few decades that all of her stonewalling and dissembling ultimately succeeds. It may not be pretty, and may incur a lot of criticism, but it has enabled the Clintons to remain in power for nearly 40 years. Hillary Clinton is 68 years old, and has been in politics for most of her adult life. I do not expect her to change before November 8 or after January 20.
1
How to be a leader--especially in politics--today in America?
I do not believe such a thing is possible. When I look over the greatest historical accomplishments whether in writing or painting or music or military leadership or when a nation is in crisis (such as when Lincoln or Churchill were leading) the most noticeable thing is that great accomplishment, leadership, goes hand in hand with directness, honesty, things laid bare,--you get a pretty decent sketch of past, present and future of situation, which is why such accomplishments are pretty well recorded by historians and handed down to posterity.
Bad leadership goes hand in hand with opacity, corruption, propaganda, fragmentation of vision, decline of all we mean by cartography whether in word or sound or picture--the best, most clear speaking, direct, rapid sketch capacity of a situation people are gradually submerged in favor of the generally cowardly, unclear, opaque, "just get along" people, and all of life becomes less transparent, less clear.
One of the most ironic things about America since WW2 is that never in all of human history has communications, capacity to describe what is occurring in a situation, been greater, but all of especially politics has become more and more opaque, more just this and that blending together if being revealed at all. No great need for clarity exists, just a trivial sketching of our life, liberty and happiness in a technocratic state? Future of overweight, opaque leadership?
I do not believe such a thing is possible. When I look over the greatest historical accomplishments whether in writing or painting or music or military leadership or when a nation is in crisis (such as when Lincoln or Churchill were leading) the most noticeable thing is that great accomplishment, leadership, goes hand in hand with directness, honesty, things laid bare,--you get a pretty decent sketch of past, present and future of situation, which is why such accomplishments are pretty well recorded by historians and handed down to posterity.
Bad leadership goes hand in hand with opacity, corruption, propaganda, fragmentation of vision, decline of all we mean by cartography whether in word or sound or picture--the best, most clear speaking, direct, rapid sketch capacity of a situation people are gradually submerged in favor of the generally cowardly, unclear, opaque, "just get along" people, and all of life becomes less transparent, less clear.
One of the most ironic things about America since WW2 is that never in all of human history has communications, capacity to describe what is occurring in a situation, been greater, but all of especially politics has become more and more opaque, more just this and that blending together if being revealed at all. No great need for clarity exists, just a trivial sketching of our life, liberty and happiness in a technocratic state? Future of overweight, opaque leadership?
Respectfully, this is a clear double standard being applied to the female candidate. There is not mention of the other candidate and his complete lack of grace and complete lack of respect for fellow citizens with whom he disagrees. I cannot speak for Hillary, but if I had been subjected to decades of smear tactics and lies used by the right to discredit me, I wouldn't want to give them any additional fodder either. In the current election cycle the press has legitimized a lunatic candidate, wallowed in the circus that the electoral process has become and has looked for crumbs of evidence with which to discredit the most qualified presidential candidate we are likely to ever have. The mistrust is well deserved.
3
Is it a case of the chicken or the egg? Does "grace" (a favorite word of so many) come to the best of us instinctually or does it come after experiencing that awe inspiring act of forgiveness. If the latter, maybe we, the public need to go first. Build trust by gracefully accepting the flaws of the leaders we believe most qualified and see how they act in return.
I fear that we are too far down the road of hate and retribution and that it will take some calamity or a new generation looking back at our disfunction to teach us the lesson of human frailty in all of us and the forgiveness that leads to empathetic and graceful leadership.
I fear that we are too far down the road of hate and retribution and that it will take some calamity or a new generation looking back at our disfunction to teach us the lesson of human frailty in all of us and the forgiveness that leads to empathetic and graceful leadership.
1
James Fallows, writing about Obama, said this about judging presidents:
"We judge presidents by the specific expectations they ask to be measured against: inspiration (Kennedy, Reagan, Obama), competence and experience (Eisenhower, the first George Bush), strategic cunning (Johnson, Nixon), integrity and personal probity (Carter), inclusiveness and empathy (Clinton), unshakable resolve (the second Bush). But eventually each is judged against his predecessors, a process that properly starts with a reminder that all begin their terms ill-equipped, in ways that hindsight tends to obscure." http://tinyurl.com/98pkoap
Then, writing about the President's "Amazing Grace" speech, Fallows went on to say, "One thing we’ve learned about post-presidencies is that much of the poison drains away. We like nearly all of these people better once they’re out of office than when they were in the middle of the fray. You can imagine a post-presidential Obama being able to do more, on the 'bring us together' front, than the poison of today’s national politics has allowed him to do in office." http://tinyurl.com/pon6del
After this mess of a presidential election, we sure can use someone like Obama who can "bring us together."
"We judge presidents by the specific expectations they ask to be measured against: inspiration (Kennedy, Reagan, Obama), competence and experience (Eisenhower, the first George Bush), strategic cunning (Johnson, Nixon), integrity and personal probity (Carter), inclusiveness and empathy (Clinton), unshakable resolve (the second Bush). But eventually each is judged against his predecessors, a process that properly starts with a reminder that all begin their terms ill-equipped, in ways that hindsight tends to obscure." http://tinyurl.com/98pkoap
Then, writing about the President's "Amazing Grace" speech, Fallows went on to say, "One thing we’ve learned about post-presidencies is that much of the poison drains away. We like nearly all of these people better once they’re out of office than when they were in the middle of the fray. You can imagine a post-presidential Obama being able to do more, on the 'bring us together' front, than the poison of today’s national politics has allowed him to do in office." http://tinyurl.com/pon6del
After this mess of a presidential election, we sure can use someone like Obama who can "bring us together."
1
The phrase in Mr. Brooks's column that most resonates with me is "no one is raised with a code of stewardship and a sense of personal privilege and duty." The 2016 presidential election cycle has been particularly egregious on the "honor code" front, but I submit that any such code disappeared from the American political landscape decades ago.
Before that, most politicians at least pretended to be honorable. Perhaps today's serial abuse, mendacity and refusal to take responsibility for one's own personal behavior is better than the insinuating hypocrisy that preceded it, but even pretending is a signal that grace is a value to be honored, emulated, desired and admired.
In this regard, President Obama, flaws and all, is a model of grace, one that I would happily point out to my children and grandchildren to emulate. But Obama is a rare commodity. The role models parading today at the tip of our political pyramid scare me more for the life lessons they are teaching our young than for the more direct consequences of their peculiar venality.
www.endthemadnessnow.org
Before that, most politicians at least pretended to be honorable. Perhaps today's serial abuse, mendacity and refusal to take responsibility for one's own personal behavior is better than the insinuating hypocrisy that preceded it, but even pretending is a signal that grace is a value to be honored, emulated, desired and admired.
In this regard, President Obama, flaws and all, is a model of grace, one that I would happily point out to my children and grandchildren to emulate. But Obama is a rare commodity. The role models parading today at the tip of our political pyramid scare me more for the life lessons they are teaching our young than for the more direct consequences of their peculiar venality.
www.endthemadnessnow.org
1
I think our current president fits Brooks’ description of ‘gracious’ quite well. And how exactly have the Republicans treated such graciousness. They’ve ruthlessly tried to smear his character by questioning his birthplace, his religion, his patriotism, his ideals and his graciousness itself. The only thing the current crop of Republicans haven’t questioned is the size of his hands. The fact is when working with a group of ideologues and bigots who will do and say anything to ensure a non-white and/or non-male president fails, being gracious is a losing proposition. We need a tough, thick-skinned president who has proven that he or she can stand up to endless personal attacks and still keep going forward. As much as David seems intent on finding reasons not to like Hillary, the fact is she is tough and has what it takes to be president at a time when a saint would be crucified by the opposition.
Fools, trolling for fools. Plenty of fools on the right bank, but they only respond to the red meat of bigotry. The Republicans are masters of logical fallacy and Brooks is too clever but has gone to far this time. Graciousness? When the Republican Party requires a muzzle, when misogyny, and conspiracies about Benghazi, email, and health abound, Clinton's response should be gracious?
Many of my liberal friends tell me that David Brooks agonizes to persist supporting a Republican Party that has been brainwashed into becoming the Grand Old Tea Party designed and funded by neo fascist Kochs and their racist, xenophobic friends. I disagree. Brooks is the rational story teller who can spin tales that appeal to rational persons because they contain threads of human virtue. If only Hillary would be gracious and let Trump have a chance to explain why he insulted Mexico, Mexicans, Blacks, women, the Handicapped, the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the Truth, why he is so obnoxious, such a bully, and a liar who calls others liars?
David is right about experience. He has yet to personally experience real virtue and genuine moral courage. 8:33 am
Many of my liberal friends tell me that David Brooks agonizes to persist supporting a Republican Party that has been brainwashed into becoming the Grand Old Tea Party designed and funded by neo fascist Kochs and their racist, xenophobic friends. I disagree. Brooks is the rational story teller who can spin tales that appeal to rational persons because they contain threads of human virtue. If only Hillary would be gracious and let Trump have a chance to explain why he insulted Mexico, Mexicans, Blacks, women, the Handicapped, the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the Truth, why he is so obnoxious, such a bully, and a liar who calls others liars?
David is right about experience. He has yet to personally experience real virtue and genuine moral courage. 8:33 am
1
Graciousness would be a nice attribute to have as President, but it's not among the most important attributes. As noted in the textbook 'American Government', some common leadership qualities that good Presidents have include:
- A strong vision for the country's future
- An ability to put their own times in the perspective of history
- Effective communication skills
- The courage to make unpopular decisions
- Crisis management skills
- Character and integrity
- Wise appointments
- An ability to work with Congress
Hillary appears to have many if not all of the above attributes, as indicated in many of her positions of leadership within the Federal Government and her consistent, detailed statements on her vision for addressing all key issues facing our country's future.
Trump has zero fixed principles. There is nothing - no fundamental truths, no foundation of beliefs - on which he stands firmly, resolutely, and without question. Trump has no moral compass and no character, and is incapable of rational thought and analysis. If by chance Trump wins the Presidency, Trump would flip flop along, year after year, finger to the wind, on each and every issue that drops on his desk.
Given the choice this year, I'd rather have a President with Hillary's character rather than someone in Trump's mold.
- A strong vision for the country's future
- An ability to put their own times in the perspective of history
- Effective communication skills
- The courage to make unpopular decisions
- Crisis management skills
- Character and integrity
- Wise appointments
- An ability to work with Congress
Hillary appears to have many if not all of the above attributes, as indicated in many of her positions of leadership within the Federal Government and her consistent, detailed statements on her vision for addressing all key issues facing our country's future.
Trump has zero fixed principles. There is nothing - no fundamental truths, no foundation of beliefs - on which he stands firmly, resolutely, and without question. Trump has no moral compass and no character, and is incapable of rational thought and analysis. If by chance Trump wins the Presidency, Trump would flip flop along, year after year, finger to the wind, on each and every issue that drops on his desk.
Given the choice this year, I'd rather have a President with Hillary's character rather than someone in Trump's mold.
2
"If you treat the world as a friendly and hopeful place, as a web of relationships, you’ll look for the good news in people and not the bad."
For some of us, the world is not a friendly and hopeful place. Hillary Clinton was disparaged during her husband's first excursions into politics because she had the effrontery to want to use her maiden name. It went downhill from there.
She's been accused of everything imaginable, up to and including murder. Because of the way her experiences have been covered by the media, anything she does is somehow "unseemly." How should a person, a woman especially, respond to that?
I think she has learned from experience. As a woman similar in age to Hillary Clinton, I've learned some of the same things.
I'd very much like to be able to control how people react to me, but I know, as I am sure Clinton does, that I can only control my own reaction to what others do. If she were to "trust" her fellow citizens, especially those on what has become the contemporary right, I'd think she's stupid and that's one thing she's certainly not.
For some of us, the world is not a friendly and hopeful place. Hillary Clinton was disparaged during her husband's first excursions into politics because she had the effrontery to want to use her maiden name. It went downhill from there.
She's been accused of everything imaginable, up to and including murder. Because of the way her experiences have been covered by the media, anything she does is somehow "unseemly." How should a person, a woman especially, respond to that?
I think she has learned from experience. As a woman similar in age to Hillary Clinton, I've learned some of the same things.
I'd very much like to be able to control how people react to me, but I know, as I am sure Clinton does, that I can only control my own reaction to what others do. If she were to "trust" her fellow citizens, especially those on what has become the contemporary right, I'd think she's stupid and that's one thing she's certainly not.
3
I agree with those who have written in to say that Mr. Brooks seems off base in focusing on grace, or at least a version of it, that he sees lacking in Ms. Clinton. What I think he misses considering is what it takes to move from a less privileged position in our society to a more privileged one. Here I am not talking about socio-economics. Instead, I am talking about gender bias. To be breaking into the man's world and the man's club of politics, as she is doing, may mean not being being able to be the epitome of grace. But grace may not be the point when one is trying to prove that as a representative of an underrepresented class, one can do the work that the represented or overrepresented can. Congress, for example, does not represent the gender break down of our society. We still underpay women to do similar work that men do. To break through such biases takes discipline and grit, and sometimes these two qualities may overshadow the grace one may also have. As soon as we normalize having women be seen as significant as men in the major positions in our society, then discussions about grace may be more relevant. But at the moment, as Hillary Clinton works to break a barrier, I suspect grace is the least of her worries, and it should be least of ours. It is good to remember: pioneering typically is not a smooth or easy process, and often, it is not even graceful (much as we might wish that it were).
2
There's a significant difference between leading moral movements, King, Gandhi and pre-governance Mandela, versus getting involved in the down and dirty realm of politics. Politics is more like war, than a pacifist moral crusade.
It's too easy to ascribe graciousness to a moral movement leader because they could not become one without it.
To survive and continue to lead in the political realm with grace is a once in a generation occurrence, Obama, Kennedy and Roosevelt.
Attempting to compare Hilary Clinton to Gandhi and King is a specious analysis.
It's too easy to ascribe graciousness to a moral movement leader because they could not become one without it.
To survive and continue to lead in the political realm with grace is a once in a generation occurrence, Obama, Kennedy and Roosevelt.
Attempting to compare Hilary Clinton to Gandhi and King is a specious analysis.
My. How we bristle when Hillary's weaknesses are addressed. I will support her willingly, especially given the alternative. But remember that the numbers concerning her trustworthiness are abysmal. Those numbers are not a result of her missteps, but are the result of her unwillingness to admit to faults. It would have been better, and easier, if she had either not made those missteps or admitted to them as soon as they were exposed. This is a personality trait that turns a lot people off. So I wonder, rather than double down, wouldn't it be wiser to admit that she'd appear to be more trustworthy if she made a concerted effort of come clean before getting all tangled up in these mostly meaningless squabbles? Who better than her ardent supporters to show her that she can do better in the future with a little less inflexibility? We all make mistakes. Why not admit to those mistakes as soon as they are exposed? I'm certain she would come off as more genuine and that her trustworthy numbers would improve.
I think that one of the commenters here, Terrence Gaffney, expressed the difficulty that Hillary has in terms of her character, 'Sometimes I wonder if her desire always to be perfect prevents her from accepting the imperfection which is part of the human condition.'
Many of us who cringed at her lies, her modest achievements as a senator and as secretary of state, will vote for her anyway. There is no other sane option.
President Obama knows Hillary and endorsed her. The reason for that isn't only the desire to cement his legacy; I believe that he deeply cares about our country, its adults and its children. He would not risk our welfare with a commander and chief that he does not believe in.
Many of us who cringed at her lies, her modest achievements as a senator and as secretary of state, will vote for her anyway. There is no other sane option.
President Obama knows Hillary and endorsed her. The reason for that isn't only the desire to cement his legacy; I believe that he deeply cares about our country, its adults and its children. He would not risk our welfare with a commander and chief that he does not believe in.
Mr. Brooks lists some individuals that he would consider gracious and I totally agree. I would also include on that list Mother Teresa from Calcutta who is destined for sainthood. She was probably one of the most humble and gracious human beings who ever walked the earth. She came from a wealthy family yet nothing was beneath her. She saw Jesus in every human being no matter their station in life. She picked up the dead bodies off the street without a second thought. How many of us could do that on a daily basis. Of course, she was an unusual lady. This is graciousness personified.
I do not think Hillary Clinton meets the definition of graciousness and at times seems course and unrefined. I think she is so desperate to be the first woman president of the US that she does not care how she comes across to the American people. She is not truthful and honest and is unprepared to run one of the most important offices in the world. The Clinton Foundation leaves us wondering what actually occurred between the donors and herself. They did receive special treatment for donating large sums of money and have access to her? Her email fiasco is another concern that should be fully investigated to let the American public know what was contained in that correspondence. I am sure there is more to be revealed about the Clintons and it is not pretty.
I do not think Hillary Clinton meets the definition of graciousness and at times seems course and unrefined. I think she is so desperate to be the first woman president of the US that she does not care how she comes across to the American people. She is not truthful and honest and is unprepared to run one of the most important offices in the world. The Clinton Foundation leaves us wondering what actually occurred between the donors and herself. They did receive special treatment for donating large sums of money and have access to her? Her email fiasco is another concern that should be fully investigated to let the American public know what was contained in that correspondence. I am sure there is more to be revealed about the Clintons and it is not pretty.
I think early on Hillary learned that she has opponents that have a inherent and insatiable desire to harm her political career. This desire been unfulfilled for 30 years as the approach she takes in her career seems to concentrate on hard work. I think the attacks on her fail because she has actually accomplished goals that are for the best for most people in the U.S.
The attacks by angry white men will continue as they have continued on President Obama.
The attacks by angry white men will continue as they have continued on President Obama.
3
Hilary Clinton is human! Ever since she entered public awareness, she has been attacked, vilified, humiliated and, yes, lied about. I grant you that her reticence and reluctance to disclose more of herself and her foolish prevarication and equivocation in response to these attacks has cost her dearly.
That being said, consider the following:
* How many women whose husbands have cheated on them have reacted with angry denial before having to face private and public humiliation?
* How many politicians have a squeaky clean cache of emails? We have no idea since no one examines them.
* "Pay to play"? The entire structure of our political system is set up to solicit and buy influence: the cadres of corporate lobbyists; huge campaign donations by individuals, corporations, "friends" and even foreign countries (How do you think Benjamin Netanyahu got invited to speak before Congress?) And yet, all we can find in Hilary's email trove are some introductions for foreigners to some Americans. Maybe the foreign countries that benefit from the work of the Clinton Foundation actually believe in, appreciate and support its work.
* how many people are taken to task for accepting large monetary compensation or fees? Athletes? Celebrities? DT?
I could go on.
Clinton has spent most of her political career under a hostile microscope smeared onto poisoned slides, and, mirabile visu, she has been revealed to possess some basic human flaws and weaknesses!
Consider the alternative.
That being said, consider the following:
* How many women whose husbands have cheated on them have reacted with angry denial before having to face private and public humiliation?
* How many politicians have a squeaky clean cache of emails? We have no idea since no one examines them.
* "Pay to play"? The entire structure of our political system is set up to solicit and buy influence: the cadres of corporate lobbyists; huge campaign donations by individuals, corporations, "friends" and even foreign countries (How do you think Benjamin Netanyahu got invited to speak before Congress?) And yet, all we can find in Hilary's email trove are some introductions for foreigners to some Americans. Maybe the foreign countries that benefit from the work of the Clinton Foundation actually believe in, appreciate and support its work.
* how many people are taken to task for accepting large monetary compensation or fees? Athletes? Celebrities? DT?
I could go on.
Clinton has spent most of her political career under a hostile microscope smeared onto poisoned slides, and, mirabile visu, she has been revealed to possess some basic human flaws and weaknesses!
Consider the alternative.
1
For another example of gracious leadership vs. selfishness, compare how President Obama and Donald Trump responded to the flooding in LA. Governor Edwards specifically asked for Trump not to turn a visit into a photo-op and for President Obama to wait until the proper security could be ensured. President Obama obliged the request, holding off in the immediate aftermath, while Trump did not, turning the destruction not only into campaign pics, but another chance to baselessly attack our President.
It speaks volumes about the real and the would-be President when they choose whether to be personally opportunistic in a crisis.
It speaks volumes about the real and the would-be President when they choose whether to be personally opportunistic in a crisis.
4
David Brooks said: "Amid the email scandal she is repeating the same mistakes she made during the Rose Law Firm scandal two decades ago. Her posture is still brittle, stonewalling and dissembling. Clinton scandals are all the same. There’s an act of unseemly but not felonious behavior, then the futile drawn-out withholding of information, and forever after the unwillingness to ever come clean." What is lost in this "analysis" is what does one do when the charges are false? How does one address such charges an then "come clean"? The reason these false charges seem to have a life of their own is that those who make them provide NO evidence to substantiate them. That is the problem. Hillary is not perfect, but she is not as bad as some would have you believe. There is a simple answer to the question of whether the Clinton Foundation is and was being operated for persona gain, if that is what some believe. The answer is to audit the books. If there was "pay to play", while she was Sec. of State, where's evidence for the "quid pro quo"?
1
Two very flawed candidates for the presidency are the best we can do? They're making Gary Johnson, who under any other set of circumstances wouldn't poll above 2%, appear as a breath of fresh air in getting double-digit numbers in some surveys.
Brooks's description of Clinton is not completely unfair. However, in the battle to be the lesser of two evils she remains several stories above the basement, Trump's current, as well as past and future, residence.
David's mention of the role of the military in developing leaders of strong demeanor and humble attitude. This is still largely the case, despite the recent shortcomings of David Petraeus. Generals, too, are human. But Petraeus did acknowledge his errors and apologized. (My issue with the handling of his case is that his rank was his shield of protection. Had he been Master Sergeant or Sergeant-Major, an enlisted man, his fate would have been completely different.) I am convinced that military experience, officer or enlisted, even if only for a single term of 3 or 4 years, is as or more valuable than all the higher education or all the money in the world for development of a leader. As a requirement, formal or informal, for the presidency, such service weighs heavily on the positive side of the scale of judging a person's fitness for office.
Brooks's description of Clinton is not completely unfair. However, in the battle to be the lesser of two evils she remains several stories above the basement, Trump's current, as well as past and future, residence.
David's mention of the role of the military in developing leaders of strong demeanor and humble attitude. This is still largely the case, despite the recent shortcomings of David Petraeus. Generals, too, are human. But Petraeus did acknowledge his errors and apologized. (My issue with the handling of his case is that his rank was his shield of protection. Had he been Master Sergeant or Sergeant-Major, an enlisted man, his fate would have been completely different.) I am convinced that military experience, officer or enlisted, even if only for a single term of 3 or 4 years, is as or more valuable than all the higher education or all the money in the world for development of a leader. As a requirement, formal or informal, for the presidency, such service weighs heavily on the positive side of the scale of judging a person's fitness for office.
What is missing from this delicious story is the ending of each incidence of scandal dredged up on Hillary Clinton.
She still didn't kill Vince Foster. The Rose Law Firm papers had no scandal ultimately attached. The Lewinsky mess was not hers to answer to since marriage is a private matter (and she had been married only once). Whitewater turned out to be a money loser and simply a bad investment run by others who did bad things. The emails were handled the same way her predecessor had. Somehow, in all of this, one Karl Rove, Republican operative and White House official, destroyed hundreds of thousands of White House emails and never answered his Congressional subpoena on that matter.
There is a pattern here that is unrecognized by Mr Brooks. Each time she is faced with a "scandal", she doesn't respond the way some would like by "coming clean" because she can't see the need. She could not figure out what what each scandal was even about...because there wasn't one based in what she knew. And as a good lawyer, presidence, what went before, guided her.
Oh, and one final thing while we are visiting the law: of the two forms of exposure to it under discussion here, one of the candidates has respect for the law, the other simply uses it as a cudgel to hurt people.
She still didn't kill Vince Foster. The Rose Law Firm papers had no scandal ultimately attached. The Lewinsky mess was not hers to answer to since marriage is a private matter (and she had been married only once). Whitewater turned out to be a money loser and simply a bad investment run by others who did bad things. The emails were handled the same way her predecessor had. Somehow, in all of this, one Karl Rove, Republican operative and White House official, destroyed hundreds of thousands of White House emails and never answered his Congressional subpoena on that matter.
There is a pattern here that is unrecognized by Mr Brooks. Each time she is faced with a "scandal", she doesn't respond the way some would like by "coming clean" because she can't see the need. She could not figure out what what each scandal was even about...because there wasn't one based in what she knew. And as a good lawyer, presidence, what went before, guided her.
Oh, and one final thing while we are visiting the law: of the two forms of exposure to it under discussion here, one of the candidates has respect for the law, the other simply uses it as a cudgel to hurt people.
6
The general truths of these reflections are worthy and worth reflection. But the application to Hillary Clinton is doubtful at best. None of us, including most particularly David Brooks, has any conception of what Hlllary Clinton has been through in her unique and remarkable life, nor can he or we measure the "humility" that she has distilled from her successes and failures in the public and private spheres. Indeed, I find it presumptuous in this case to preach to a person of such vast experience and intelligence about learning humility. I deeply appreciated Mr. Brooks' recent book on character, and the recovery/discussions of Dorothy Day, Eisenhower and others were insightful and helpful to me. But let's leave the lessons where they belong, and not stretch it out to HRC, Obama, or even Trump. Those things are simply beyond our ken.
David, I'm not sure what you are trying to say in that column; so I've looked up the definition of "Gracious" on Google for guidance.
Definition of "Gracious"
1. courteous, kind, and pleasant.
synonyms: courteous, polite, civil, chivalrous, well mannered, mannerly, decorous; tactful, diplomatic; kind, benevolent, considerate, thoughtful, obliging, accommodating, indulgent, magnanimous; friendly, amiable, cordial, hospitable.
antonyms: rude
2. (in Christian belief) showing divine grace.
synonyms: merciful, compassionate, kind; forgiving, lenient, clement, forbearing, humane, tenderhearted, sympathetic; indulgent, generous, magnanimous, benign, benevolent
"God's gracious intervention"
antonyms: cruel
Reading this definition, there is immediately one person that comes to mind: Barack Obama. I suspect that our children when they will read about him in history books will see him as one of the most gracious leaders in history that they can relate to.
I don't think that Hillary can ever match Obama's graciousness; but Hillary is gracious as I've never heard any report of her insulting opponents who didn't show her any grace (according to the definition above). She has maintained a decorum while many of her critics went to the gutter. And for sure her proposed policies aligns much more with the definition of graciousness than those of Trump.
That said, I also believe she made a mistake with the emails; I do hope she will finally come clean on this.
Definition of "Gracious"
1. courteous, kind, and pleasant.
synonyms: courteous, polite, civil, chivalrous, well mannered, mannerly, decorous; tactful, diplomatic; kind, benevolent, considerate, thoughtful, obliging, accommodating, indulgent, magnanimous; friendly, amiable, cordial, hospitable.
antonyms: rude
2. (in Christian belief) showing divine grace.
synonyms: merciful, compassionate, kind; forgiving, lenient, clement, forbearing, humane, tenderhearted, sympathetic; indulgent, generous, magnanimous, benign, benevolent
"God's gracious intervention"
antonyms: cruel
Reading this definition, there is immediately one person that comes to mind: Barack Obama. I suspect that our children when they will read about him in history books will see him as one of the most gracious leaders in history that they can relate to.
I don't think that Hillary can ever match Obama's graciousness; but Hillary is gracious as I've never heard any report of her insulting opponents who didn't show her any grace (according to the definition above). She has maintained a decorum while many of her critics went to the gutter. And for sure her proposed policies aligns much more with the definition of graciousness than those of Trump.
That said, I also believe she made a mistake with the emails; I do hope she will finally come clean on this.
4
Can you think of a more gracious leader; filled with integrity than President Obama? Where has that gotten him with those on The Right?
9
"Amid the email scandal she is repeating the same mistakes she made during the Rose Law Firm scandal two decades ago. Her posture is still brittle, stonewalling and dissembling."
This is a very pointed, valid observation I had not made myself in quite this way.
Here, Brooks is pointing out the failure of a person whose past error tarnished their character to learn from that error and return to the arena stronger, more resilient, more wise and -- not to put too fine a point on it -- improved.
Failing to evolve and learn, Ms Clinton continues to show us the same cycle of behavior.
I think literally millions of people's discomfort with Ms Clinton is based on precisely the syndrome Mr Brooks observes as he adds the historical context.
People's feelings about Ms Clinton are visceral. She makes us uncomfortable in the same way a colleague at work who we know would treat us dishonestly does.
This is a very pointed, valid observation I had not made myself in quite this way.
Here, Brooks is pointing out the failure of a person whose past error tarnished their character to learn from that error and return to the arena stronger, more resilient, more wise and -- not to put too fine a point on it -- improved.
Failing to evolve and learn, Ms Clinton continues to show us the same cycle of behavior.
I think literally millions of people's discomfort with Ms Clinton is based on precisely the syndrome Mr Brooks observes as he adds the historical context.
People's feelings about Ms Clinton are visceral. She makes us uncomfortable in the same way a colleague at work who we know would treat us dishonestly does.
Ms. Clinton has to be "gracious" in your eyes?
Her opponent is a screaming, rambling, moronic, ape-like fool and the only thing you have for us is a subtle, Brooksian put down of her "brittleness"?
Where the heck were you when the "less than gracious" Tea Party took over the bunch YOU support?
I guess wearing colonial hats, waving yellow "Don't Tread on Me" flags and screaming "Jail Her' is subtle for the crowd you apparently champion.
I know it's tough admitting one has been absolutely wrong these last few years but you seem rather intelligent so enough of this "hair splitting" and either endorse "Benito Jr. Trump" or someone else but save your convoluted rhetoric for your collection of essays as the choice of whom to lead the country has never been clearer than now.
"Gracious Leadership" indeed; go attend a Trump rally and then tell us all how "gracious" that infernal crowd is!
Her opponent is a screaming, rambling, moronic, ape-like fool and the only thing you have for us is a subtle, Brooksian put down of her "brittleness"?
Where the heck were you when the "less than gracious" Tea Party took over the bunch YOU support?
I guess wearing colonial hats, waving yellow "Don't Tread on Me" flags and screaming "Jail Her' is subtle for the crowd you apparently champion.
I know it's tough admitting one has been absolutely wrong these last few years but you seem rather intelligent so enough of this "hair splitting" and either endorse "Benito Jr. Trump" or someone else but save your convoluted rhetoric for your collection of essays as the choice of whom to lead the country has never been clearer than now.
"Gracious Leadership" indeed; go attend a Trump rally and then tell us all how "gracious" that infernal crowd is!
6
HRC's treatment from 90's healthcare to Benghazi, from the press and GOP congressmen, shows she is right to be prudent (and maybe a little paranoid) sharing information. The downsides are huge, as stories are fabricated from nothing or things are taken out of context. There are full time media armies doing just that already.
And the upsides of openness are what? Appease the whiners? Unless lack of "openness" puts the election in question it is no contest.
And the upsides of openness are what? Appease the whiners? Unless lack of "openness" puts the election in question it is no contest.
9
No.
The emperor is naked!
Let me ask why no one is dragging T's dirty laundry around? Guy could not have been a saint as a property owner in New York since the 70's?
Why am I hearing about release of someone's email? ALL Americans want their email to be private - never to be released. So you keep hounding that dog and I have my popcorn as your facade crumbles.
The emperor is naked!
Let me ask why no one is dragging T's dirty laundry around? Guy could not have been a saint as a property owner in New York since the 70's?
Why am I hearing about release of someone's email? ALL Americans want their email to be private - never to be released. So you keep hounding that dog and I have my popcorn as your facade crumbles.
4
This election is certainly unique because Mrs. Clinton, the person most folks find unlikeable and untrustworthy, is likely to become our next president not on her merits but rather on the basis of her despicable opponent. She's bad but he is worse offers voters a dreadful choice, a choice without an upside. If pundits admitted the obvious that neither candidate is truly fit to be president, they would have little to write about for the next two months. In this particular train wreck of an election it matters little who wins because regardless of the victor, everyone loses.
Mr. Brooks, it's been sad to watch you grapple for something meaningful to write this election cycle. Perhaps you should just take a break.
10
This description of the ideal leader would certainly exclude Donald Trump. Grace and humility? Get serious.
5
Actually this article isn't very gracious....
10
First, I don't understand what disobeying a regulation has to do with inhumanity.
Brooks better go to a thesaurus for another term. Second, we all agree that using a private server was an error that is having political consequences. This much has been established. What has not been established is whether such a disregard has brought about dire consequences for the country. As far as we can see, no such events have taken place. Second, I don't see the advantage of a press conference with people shouting to be heard over the many interviews she has given. I would think that in an interview, where the interviewer can get follow up questions is immensely more fruitful than a press conference. Interviewers have had all the opportunities they want to ask their questions and a press conference will not reveal more than that. Unless you think that the many journalists who interviewed have been incompetent in their task. So stop the psychiatric analysis and let Clinton take the political consequences of her actions.
Brooks better go to a thesaurus for another term. Second, we all agree that using a private server was an error that is having political consequences. This much has been established. What has not been established is whether such a disregard has brought about dire consequences for the country. As far as we can see, no such events have taken place. Second, I don't see the advantage of a press conference with people shouting to be heard over the many interviews she has given. I would think that in an interview, where the interviewer can get follow up questions is immensely more fruitful than a press conference. Interviewers have had all the opportunities they want to ask their questions and a press conference will not reveal more than that. Unless you think that the many journalists who interviewed have been incompetent in their task. So stop the psychiatric analysis and let Clinton take the political consequences of her actions.
4
I think it is time for David Brooks to go and have his eyes checked. He is increasingly showing signs of severe myopia.
In an election where Donald Trump and his entourage are hammering for all they are worth to smash the glass floor of public decency and political discourse, Brooks is lecturing Hillary Clinton on her lack of gracious leadership?
In a country where Barak Obama is the sitting president and Jimmy Carter is still alive, he is claiming that powerful personalities are necessarily lacking in the finer human qualities of humility, grace, and positive leadership?
I think I have a coupon for LensCrafters I can send him. He can get two (2) pairs of glasses for the price of one. Maybe this will allow him to get a sharper perspective on the two parties vying for office. He won't see them in the same way, or by the same criteria --- that is for sure. But at least he will be in the ballpark.
In an election where Donald Trump and his entourage are hammering for all they are worth to smash the glass floor of public decency and political discourse, Brooks is lecturing Hillary Clinton on her lack of gracious leadership?
In a country where Barak Obama is the sitting president and Jimmy Carter is still alive, he is claiming that powerful personalities are necessarily lacking in the finer human qualities of humility, grace, and positive leadership?
I think I have a coupon for LensCrafters I can send him. He can get two (2) pairs of glasses for the price of one. Maybe this will allow him to get a sharper perspective on the two parties vying for office. He won't see them in the same way, or by the same criteria --- that is for sure. But at least he will be in the ballpark.
8
In times when anger is whipped up by the ambitious and the nihilistic, and where talk of empathy and compassion is mercilessly mocked, you wonder why any politician would choose the route of graciousness.
Mr. brooks should have shown this column to his wife or mother before posting.
Please-this is so tone deaf. She is being held in this column by a different standard which is the textbook definition of sexism
Please-this is so tone deaf. She is being held in this column by a different standard which is the textbook definition of sexism
6
All America is with you, David. You need only look at the candidates' negatives, particularly in light of the fact that neither is asking for any sacrifice: politics today is a form of cynical reciprocity. Even still, we resent, dislike, and turn away from those who do nothing but pander to us and make promises for votes. The media states that we all partition character from accomplishments. But it is a lie, at least in our hearts where humanity lives.
It is revealing that getting what you want makes you neither contented nor admirable.
It is revealing that getting what you want makes you neither contented nor admirable.
3
Speak only for yourself, leave the rest of America out of it!
3
You're directing he question to the wrong person and Trump's inexperience is no excuse. He is the one you should be chastising. If you're looking for graciousness, then look at her record of service. It's there. As for Mr. Trump, he just spouts the idea of the week and his lack of grace continues to grow and grow.
5
Hillary Clinton's "scandals" are mostly just made up stuff by republicans like yourself. Get off her back and look realistically at what she has been put through the past 25 years, having to defend every minor action she takes or word she says. How many more trials will the republicans put our country through, trying to find her guilty of something? I hear the talking heads keep saying she hasnt given a news conference in months. Why would she? The only thing she would be asked would be about some stupid email answer she gave years ago, rather than some policy she is proposing to help our country.
7
This is not the time to be criticizing Hillary. Yes she has flaws--but they are flaws no different than the flaws all of us have, albeit magnified and on a grander scale given her roles and number of years in public service. There are some leaders, President Obama among them, who are extraordinarily unflawed on a personal level--but they are the exception, not the rule. Hillary is running against a truly dangerous opponent, one who would put America--indeed the whole world--at risk. This is not the time to criticize Hillary for not being perfect. This is not the time to muse on what a leader should be. This is the time to rally behind a candidate who is head and shoulders above Donald Trump--a candidate who is so morally flawed, so soulless, and so personally bankrupt that it makes one's head spin. Mr. Brooks and others who write such pieces need to realize that now is not the time for gentle musings on what constitutes an ideal leaders. Now is not the time to add voices to the alt-right and mainstream conservative movement that is already spinning far too many ugly tales about Hillary. Now is the time to embrace the reality we are dealing with--a reality that comes to this: whom would you rather have in the Oval Office---Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump? That, Mr. Brooks, is the reality. If you want to scold Hillary, fine--but do so after the election.
7
Apparently based on the personages Brooks cites, grace is an attribute confined to the male gender.
11
Inhumane to respond to a trumped up email scandal with dignity and all the weight it demands? I can think of no better response. Yet Brooks wants self-flagellation. How disconnected can the author be? He listens to a lot of radio, I imagine, as do those in the long-commute belt. Only so much canned Canned Heat can keep someone off virulent ignorance all along the dial.
And here he uses poetry again to illustrate his point. A less able man with a quote I've never read. His knowledge and use of poetry is awkward and ridiculous.
Ms Clinton's experience tells her that the Republican Party will do anything to do down her family. If she doesn't address the author's concerns it is because his concerns are minted by the so-called think tanks, rumor mills, over a glass of good wine in a philosophical and smug moment, and the so-called Alt-Right. He gets the response he deserves.
Even here, the smoothly bitter words seek to find some way to negate a woman who has spent her life in the service of others. Grace is something Mr. Brooks knows nothing about. Absolutely nothing. All there is here is a a moral gymnastics meant to stake out some higher ground that neither he nor his party has claim too.
Look at their candidate.
And here he uses poetry again to illustrate his point. A less able man with a quote I've never read. His knowledge and use of poetry is awkward and ridiculous.
Ms Clinton's experience tells her that the Republican Party will do anything to do down her family. If she doesn't address the author's concerns it is because his concerns are minted by the so-called think tanks, rumor mills, over a glass of good wine in a philosophical and smug moment, and the so-called Alt-Right. He gets the response he deserves.
Even here, the smoothly bitter words seek to find some way to negate a woman who has spent her life in the service of others. Grace is something Mr. Brooks knows nothing about. Absolutely nothing. All there is here is a a moral gymnastics meant to stake out some higher ground that neither he nor his party has claim too.
Look at their candidate.
10
"Clinton scandals are all the same..." Manufactured and hyped at nauseam. Republicans recognized her as a threat decades ago and loosed the dogs. Many of those, in Fox and in Congress, hesitated not at all to wade through innocent blood to try to grab her by the political throat. Vince Foster! The Benghazi Four! Shame on the weasels of American politics who fought the wrong enemy and allowed Trump to enter by a side-gate.
11
Interesting that you include Gandhi. He was not gracious. He was excruciatingly irritating and not particularly likable. Mr. Brooks, have you ever read anything by or about Gandhi? It leads me to believe your grasp of the history of leadership does not extend beyond cribbing the platitudes others have written.
3
Surely Mr. Brooks has received enough negative responses to his columns to know how difficult it us to stay gracious (something he has laudable accomplished).
Then surely he should be better able to realize what momentous goodwill and courage Hillary Clinton has needed - in the face of a relentless, decades long campaign to stigmatized and criminalize her -- to maintain her high level of equanimity and her recurrent demonstrations of charm
Then surely he should be better able to realize what momentous goodwill and courage Hillary Clinton has needed - in the face of a relentless, decades long campaign to stigmatized and criminalize her -- to maintain her high level of equanimity and her recurrent demonstrations of charm
10
Why don't you just give up and admit you can no longer justify being a republican Mr. Brooks? You seem like a decent, thoughtful man. Your eyes have been opened, but you keep trying not to see.
5
On the scale of graciousness: Lincoln 10, Jimmy Carter 9.5, Barack Obama 9, Hillary Clinton 6, the collective Republican Party 0, Donald Trump -4, Rudy Giuliani -5, Limbaugh -10.
Graciousness is an admirable attribute, an insight into a person's character; however, for the leader of the free world I would place wisdom (not to be confused with intelligence, knowledge, or experience, but certainly demanding all) at the top of my list of desirable attributes for presidential applicants and the voices they should to listen to.
On the scale of wisdom: Sam Harris 10, Jimmy Carter 10, Barack Obama 9, Hillary Clinton 7, David Brooks 4, the collective Republican Party 1, Rudy Giuliani -8 Donald Trump -9, Limbaugh -10.
Obviously there are other voices a president should hear and other voices NO ONE should hear. None of us is perfect, not even the 10's. But we should identify the best and dismiss the worst. The problem is, we are not always wise in choosing who we listen to, or as history proves, certainly not always wise in choosing our leaders: president, congress, state offices. We could and should do better. In this election Hillary Clinton is a wise choice; replacing all Republicans in all offices is a very wise choice.
Graciousness is an admirable attribute, an insight into a person's character; however, for the leader of the free world I would place wisdom (not to be confused with intelligence, knowledge, or experience, but certainly demanding all) at the top of my list of desirable attributes for presidential applicants and the voices they should to listen to.
On the scale of wisdom: Sam Harris 10, Jimmy Carter 10, Barack Obama 9, Hillary Clinton 7, David Brooks 4, the collective Republican Party 1, Rudy Giuliani -8 Donald Trump -9, Limbaugh -10.
Obviously there are other voices a president should hear and other voices NO ONE should hear. None of us is perfect, not even the 10's. But we should identify the best and dismiss the worst. The problem is, we are not always wise in choosing who we listen to, or as history proves, certainly not always wise in choosing our leaders: president, congress, state offices. We could and should do better. In this election Hillary Clinton is a wise choice; replacing all Republicans in all offices is a very wise choice.
17
At 69, I think it's too late for Clinton, but I am forwarding this article to my kids.
1
Hillary is a woman in a truly man's world. She can be forgiven for a slightly hard edge. More men need to embrace the feminine qualities you call "Grace". Mr Trump surely has not.
12
What a bizarre analysis! The basic premise is a bit strange. Many of the most famous and celebrated leaders were anything but "gracious". Winston Churchill comes to mind, for instance. Leaders are remembered that make and follow through on tough decisions. They have vision that they rally people behind and make transformative positive changes in our society. Graciousness is a nice to have.
But the strangest thing is for Mr Brooks to use his analysis to attack Clinton. Of all the candidates that are currently running, it would be hard to imagine "gracious" being applied to any of them but Clinton. Especially the current standard bearer for the Republican Party. Yet Mr Brooks focuses his critique on Clinton!
Even more befuddling is that Mr Brooks ignores her record of graciousness under pressure. After a devastating defeat with healthcare, she came back to work with congress to get healthcare passed for 8 million children. As a Senator she was known for working across the aisle with those that had been her harshest critics. She has handled herself with grace and poise while being grilled by a hostile congress.
Sadly, this graciousness attack on Clinton smells of misogyny from Mr Brooks. Would he be even talking about graciousness if Clinton was not a female?
But the strangest thing is for Mr Brooks to use his analysis to attack Clinton. Of all the candidates that are currently running, it would be hard to imagine "gracious" being applied to any of them but Clinton. Especially the current standard bearer for the Republican Party. Yet Mr Brooks focuses his critique on Clinton!
Even more befuddling is that Mr Brooks ignores her record of graciousness under pressure. After a devastating defeat with healthcare, she came back to work with congress to get healthcare passed for 8 million children. As a Senator she was known for working across the aisle with those that had been her harshest critics. She has handled herself with grace and poise while being grilled by a hostile congress.
Sadly, this graciousness attack on Clinton smells of misogyny from Mr Brooks. Would he be even talking about graciousness if Clinton was not a female?
6
David,
If we are going to be gracious, then also acknowledge that very few of us know what it is like to have 25 years of relentless, public political attack heaped upon our person. Maybe your advice is not as sound as you think? Maybe the army of pundits, full of advice for Hilary, are in their own feedback loop, repeatedly fooling themselves (at least a little)?
Very few of us have walked that mile in her shoes. I will never have that experience--thank heavens.
If we are going to be gracious, then also acknowledge that very few of us know what it is like to have 25 years of relentless, public political attack heaped upon our person. Maybe your advice is not as sound as you think? Maybe the army of pundits, full of advice for Hilary, are in their own feedback loop, repeatedly fooling themselves (at least a little)?
Very few of us have walked that mile in her shoes. I will never have that experience--thank heavens.
2
The minute she showed us that she was willing to embrace dishonesty and corrupt behavior by hiring Debbie Wassmerman Schultz, minutes after her resigning in disgrace from the DNC, says tells you all you need to know about Hillary Clintons core values. God alone knows what's being cooked up in secret behind our backs.
That was the moment I knew I would not be voting for her.
That was the moment I knew I would not be voting for her.
1
"You'll look for the goodness in people..."
Yes, I'm sure if Hillary Clinton held press conferences, rabid nihilist partisans like Hugh Hewitt would be gracious and open with her. Please.
Yes, I'm sure if Hillary Clinton held press conferences, rabid nihilist partisans like Hugh Hewitt would be gracious and open with her. Please.
1
"You Lie!" That is the gracious statement that began the hamstringing of our political system. Excellent advice, but given to the wrong person.
4
Hillary Clinton is no Rosa Parks nor Ella Baker nor Fannie Lou Hamer nor Barbara Jordan nor Shirley Chisolm nor Carol Mosely Braun.
Hillary Clinton is no Margaret Thatcher nor Angela Merkel nor Sheikh Hasina nor Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.
Hillary Clinton is the multimillionaire lawyer politician spouse of a multimillionaire lawyer politician who consistently ignores the fundamental ethical obligation of a lawyer to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Hillary Clinton has rarely met the truth nor known courage nor honor nor principle nor humanity nor humility nor empathy beyond her love of money and her quest for power.
When I think of Hillary Clinton it is Medusa who comes to mind instead of any body named Grace. While Bill Clinton reminds me of a chimera combination of Caliban and Cyclops.
Hillary Clinton is no Margaret Thatcher nor Angela Merkel nor Sheikh Hasina nor Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.
Hillary Clinton is the multimillionaire lawyer politician spouse of a multimillionaire lawyer politician who consistently ignores the fundamental ethical obligation of a lawyer to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Hillary Clinton has rarely met the truth nor known courage nor honor nor principle nor humanity nor humility nor empathy beyond her love of money and her quest for power.
When I think of Hillary Clinton it is Medusa who comes to mind instead of any body named Grace. While Bill Clinton reminds me of a chimera combination of Caliban and Cyclops.
2
This woman has no grace, no dignity, no sense of shame.
Hillary wants what's right for Hillary which means more power and more money, very simple
Hillary wants what's right for Hillary which means more power and more money, very simple
1
Versus who? The Grumpy Odious Prats who have retreated to their man caves to say no to everything that Obama wanted to do, all of which could have helped America in more ways than one? And if anyone needs to learn about grace and humility it's the entire GOP and Trump. They haven't met a derogatory or inflammatory comment about any ethnic group, income level, or Clinton that they feel shouldn't be said in the name of decency.
Clinton, unlike Trump, has experience. She even has a work ethic which is far short of what the GOP has had for the last 8 years. All the GOP has done is try to block everything that might have helped us unless it helped the 1% and their corporate donors more. I hardly call that the art of gracious leadership.
Clinton, unlike Trump, has experience. She even has a work ethic which is far short of what the GOP has had for the last 8 years. All the GOP has done is try to block everything that might have helped us unless it helped the 1% and their corporate donors more. I hardly call that the art of gracious leadership.
3
Mr. Brooks. I commend you for your mastery of William Buckley logic, perfect logic, wrong premise.
You have, as is the Republican form, chosen to denigrate Ms. Clinton's style vs. her substance. In making a perfect argument in that regard, you revel in your belief that "this is going to do it" and cause every voter to flee.
What you reveal instead is an inability to come up with an argument that denigrates her tremendous experience as well as, in fact, her graciousness.
Ms. Clinton has been nothing but gracious during the endless hours of inquiry before an endless stream of investigative committees. You, wrongly, accuse her because she was called before those committees, rather than admit that those committees found nothing. You dismiss the reality of anyone who has been forced to pick their words very, very carefully because even their carefully chosen words are hurled back at them in the next vicious storm of accusations and reinterpretation by you and your cohort.
When in doubt, like Breibart, Republicans attack style over substance. Yet, when you take a look at these attackers, their hatred and intolerance are clearly etched into their faces.
This column should be dismissed as a juvenile attempt at "serious" journalism.
You have, as is the Republican form, chosen to denigrate Ms. Clinton's style vs. her substance. In making a perfect argument in that regard, you revel in your belief that "this is going to do it" and cause every voter to flee.
What you reveal instead is an inability to come up with an argument that denigrates her tremendous experience as well as, in fact, her graciousness.
Ms. Clinton has been nothing but gracious during the endless hours of inquiry before an endless stream of investigative committees. You, wrongly, accuse her because she was called before those committees, rather than admit that those committees found nothing. You dismiss the reality of anyone who has been forced to pick their words very, very carefully because even their carefully chosen words are hurled back at them in the next vicious storm of accusations and reinterpretation by you and your cohort.
When in doubt, like Breibart, Republicans attack style over substance. Yet, when you take a look at these attackers, their hatred and intolerance are clearly etched into their faces.
This column should be dismissed as a juvenile attempt at "serious" journalism.
12
Clinton came in to politics thinking the world a friendly and hopeful place. She learned that ruthless people were out to destroy her and her husband in any possible way, even accusing them of murder, regardless of truth or honor. The graciousness you ask for, David, is seen in Hillary as vulnerability, weakness and dishonesty and mercilessly attacked. We behave as we are treated. How about treating Clinton with hopeful, gracious friendliness and laying off the ceaseless smears?
12
Obama has been gracious and been assaulted by the Republicans and the Right Wing as weak, ineffectual and not an American Citizen. We insult peaceful Muslims constantly for not stopping the fanatics. Why should an American Indian, a Black or a profiled person for the color of their skin, be the only ones that grace and dignity or required for? Why would they trust a conservative who refuses to police his own? Many years ago, as an artist, I had to accept the American way of profit for the Classical Arts and if working in the private sector, to accept that I would never make much money at something that meant so much in history to every culture. I would give more scholarships to worthy, talented students of little means than could cover my costs if I choose to work in the long term private sector rather than a limited school. But every profession, with the of the trades and market, faces the same issue in relation to quality. Even politics. Does the Clinton Foundation (a public, not a private foundation) do worthwhile work and spend most of its money on that work rather than salaries? Was Obama born in Hawaii? If Obama was white would he still have a Harvard Degree and edit the Law Review and be known as a successful Constitutional Professor? If Hillary were a male politician, would she be constantly followed and harassed by right wing apparatchiks or would she have simply belonged to the Men's club like bankrupt Trump corporations?
5
With a n=1, the "value" in any of these provocations are best served when meditating on them and taking time to review the thoughts between the lines. I would guess Mr. Brook's thoughts are not about making HC "June Cleaver". It gets to the core of our leaders regardless of party, office, industry or life-role and what we should hold them AND ourselves accountable to. As one voting for HC, I/we need to put the bias aside and "experience" the incentive his thought plants.
Certainly Barack Obama comes to mind as a gracious leader. He oozes it.
But I also think immediately of President Carter who was not only gracious, but has lived his post presidential years in the most exemplary fashion imaginable.
But I also think immediately of President Carter who was not only gracious, but has lived his post presidential years in the most exemplary fashion imaginable.
22
Can you think and write at the same time?
In saying that Americans are desperate for gracious leadership, you're implying that Obama hasn't been a gracious leader. And that is simply wrong. If there is one thing that O (and his wife) have radiated for eight years in the face of unrelenting hostility, it has been grace.
In saying that Americans are desperate for gracious leadership, you're implying that Obama hasn't been a gracious leader. And that is simply wrong. If there is one thing that O (and his wife) have radiated for eight years in the face of unrelenting hostility, it has been grace.
37
Apologize for what? The over investigated Whitewater that revealed no wrong doing? For using a private email server so she could keep her private life private as well as facilitating frank discussion with friends and advisors? For earning millions giving speeches to people who weren't listening and to whom she has little to say? For using her fame and connections to raise money for a new public charity?
Give the lady a break. Find some other way to prove you are a conservative columnist despite being embarrassed by the people who would listen to you.
Give the lady a break. Find some other way to prove you are a conservative columnist despite being embarrassed by the people who would listen to you.
12
The one thing that is common to all of your examples is that they believed that all people have value, and that even if their labor did not have an equal value, that all of their labor had value as well.
1
It's a rare election when candidates don't have to make stuff up about their opponent. Run an ad with some stories off Breitbart News with the ties that bind and anyone paying attention will write off Mr. Trump for good. Those that still vote for Mr. Trump will support the alt-right through noirish views or mindless complacency.
Votes for the Republican presidential nominee this election cycle will reflect the passive ignorance contained within the USA, along with the depth of bigoted roots. One can hope for the smallest percentage to place the USA in the best light, but what of the Republican leaders supporting Mr. Trump for their self-interest over others? Shouldn't they be held accountable too?
We can do better.
Votes for the Republican presidential nominee this election cycle will reflect the passive ignorance contained within the USA, along with the depth of bigoted roots. One can hope for the smallest percentage to place the USA in the best light, but what of the Republican leaders supporting Mr. Trump for their self-interest over others? Shouldn't they be held accountable too?
We can do better.
2
I'm noting a pattern to these David Brooks essays. He laments the lack of some civilizing factor in the public sphere, then he calls on a democrat (usually Hillary) to rise to the challenge and behave better. What's noticeabley lacking is an appeal to the Republicans to do the same. Try exhorting your own party, David, or admit that the GOP is a lost cause.
34
Mr. Brooks, this is the most sanctimonious article you have written in a long time. Nowhere did you ever acknowledge the open hostility and bias that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama have been subject to from the Republican leadership and right wing media. The standard you seek to hold Mrs. Clinton to is completely completely devoid of context. And with your narrow focus on her, you conveniently did not address the complete lack of graciousness of Republican leaders like Mitch McConnell, Eric Cantor, Trey Livingstone, Paul Ryan, and Donald Trump. Your article belongs more on Fox News than the New York Time.
45
I've often said if President Obama were a Republican the right-wing would have already etched his face on Mt. Rushmore and the $20 bill.
-Gracious
-Smart and Articulate
-Dedicated Family Man
-Intelligent Wife, Thoughtful Beautiful Kids
-Got Bin Laden, Safed GM and brought us back from financial brink
It's really what the GOP prays for but can never realize because they cater to the lowest, worst instincts in a constiguency that already feels left behind. That's why a Palin and Trump have the stage.
-Gracious
-Smart and Articulate
-Dedicated Family Man
-Intelligent Wife, Thoughtful Beautiful Kids
-Got Bin Laden, Safed GM and brought us back from financial brink
It's really what the GOP prays for but can never realize because they cater to the lowest, worst instincts in a constiguency that already feels left behind. That's why a Palin and Trump have the stage.
4
Why do I get the feeling that Lord Brooks, minion of the GOP AKA the party of no, is anything but a gracious leader or a gracious loser? He can't support Trump so he denigrates Clinton instead. I think that Clinton knows she's not the center of the universe. I can't say the same for Trump based upon his behavior. And Clinton has experienced life: she's been a student, a wife, a lawyer, a mother, a First Lady, a senator, a Secretary of State (which is also a diplomatic position), and a grandmother. Everyone who's worked with her has complimented her on her work ethic. Part of a good work ethic is being a team player and knowing that good ideas come from all over.
The reasons behind how she deal with the press and its ravenous appetite for scandal might have to do with how often it's caused her and her family problems. The suicide of Vince Foster comes to mind. Her making a lot of money from a small investment and the accusations that followed. The email issue where it's been shown, over and over that she didn't do anything prosecutable. One thing about Clinton is that she doesn't repeat the mistake even if she doesn't blather on about how wrong she was or apologize in advance to satisfy the pundits. Trump keeps on making the same mistake: being a hot air balloon.
Why aren't you taking the entire GOP to task? Why just Clinton. Is it because she's a woman and easier to pick on? Or is it that you don't want to admit that the GOP is having a nervous breakdown?
The reasons behind how she deal with the press and its ravenous appetite for scandal might have to do with how often it's caused her and her family problems. The suicide of Vince Foster comes to mind. Her making a lot of money from a small investment and the accusations that followed. The email issue where it's been shown, over and over that she didn't do anything prosecutable. One thing about Clinton is that she doesn't repeat the mistake even if she doesn't blather on about how wrong she was or apologize in advance to satisfy the pundits. Trump keeps on making the same mistake: being a hot air balloon.
Why aren't you taking the entire GOP to task? Why just Clinton. Is it because she's a woman and easier to pick on? Or is it that you don't want to admit that the GOP is having a nervous breakdown?
8
I still don't get the "unseemliness' of the private email server. What was IN the emails? (yes 3 emails out of more than 80,000+ had a little © somewhere in the body, not the header, which meant classified). Busy, highly placed people get hundreds of emails daily, even thousands. It would be physically impossible for Mrs. Clinton to read all of them or reply to all of them. Her close staff probably screened the emails and gave her only the important stuff. The servers of major corporations and many government agencies have been hacked. So, were Clinton's emails hacked? Which ones, if so? If not, maybe she did the right thing. Until we see what was IN those emails, it's just a pro forma attack, the same as the suicide of Vince Foster, the false accusations of Whitewater, and the kerfluffle about why she wears pant suits.
20
This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.
WSJ
WSJ
2
When will Trump release his tax returns?
What is he hiding?
Wonder how much he owes to Russian oligarchs. Can't wait to find out!
What is he hiding?
Wonder how much he owes to Russian oligarchs. Can't wait to find out!
3
So you're ok with trump?
3
I am not OK with Trump.
2 wrongs do not make a right.
2 wrongs do not make a right.
1
''scandal'' is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as: ''An action or event regarded as morally or legally wrong and causing general public outrage''
According to FBI Director Comey's testimony, three (of 30,000) Clinton emails had portions marked ''Confidential.'' The same emails, as sent to Secretary Clinton, lacked the usual, required prominent headings, as defined by Department of State classification rules. Watch this brief exchange: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn-p-Cpskiw
The subject emails did not disclose top secret material, but referred to matters considered sensitive. Top secret emails are handled in an entirely different, secure system, used by our defense, foreign affairs and intelligence services that no one has ever alleged Clinton breached.
Who else used personal emails for day-to-day government business?
Jeb Bush, who, after stepping down as Governor, simply deleted his emails.
Colin Powell used his personal AOL account while Secretary of State, with a private internet connection installed in his office.
Jason Chaffetz, the Chairman of the House committee exaggerating the Clinton email issue, features his personal email address on his House business card.
If the standard Comey applied is zero, Clinton exceeded it by three (of 30,000) emails. None disclosed important secrets or compromised national security. Nothing that would cause any reasonable prosecutor to bring charges.
What is the scandal again?
According to FBI Director Comey's testimony, three (of 30,000) Clinton emails had portions marked ''Confidential.'' The same emails, as sent to Secretary Clinton, lacked the usual, required prominent headings, as defined by Department of State classification rules. Watch this brief exchange: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn-p-Cpskiw
The subject emails did not disclose top secret material, but referred to matters considered sensitive. Top secret emails are handled in an entirely different, secure system, used by our defense, foreign affairs and intelligence services that no one has ever alleged Clinton breached.
Who else used personal emails for day-to-day government business?
Jeb Bush, who, after stepping down as Governor, simply deleted his emails.
Colin Powell used his personal AOL account while Secretary of State, with a private internet connection installed in his office.
Jason Chaffetz, the Chairman of the House committee exaggerating the Clinton email issue, features his personal email address on his House business card.
If the standard Comey applied is zero, Clinton exceeded it by three (of 30,000) emails. None disclosed important secrets or compromised national security. Nothing that would cause any reasonable prosecutor to bring charges.
What is the scandal again?
52
Brooks has been attacking Clinton for years so what else is new. No doubt Brooks' believes George Bush was gracious since he was one of his avid supporters. Or how about that Republican House committee she sat in front of for about 10 hours while they grandstanded. The Brooks graciousness standard. Brooks burbles on about graciousness while Clinton is the only thing standing between the US and a Trump presidency which personifies some of the most ugly aspects of our society. Nothing like getting your priorities right Mr Brooks.
57
Hillary was plenty gracious in not tying Trump's racism to the entire Republican establishment.
82
Among your great, gracious leaders, add President Obama. He has had a largely thankless job for 8 years, with an obstructionist Congress who would rather we all fail than he have success in his legacy, and a right0wing propaganda apparatus which has portrayed him as everything from un-American to a despot to the member of Al-Qaeda that did not hit the White House on 9/11. Yet onward he marches, going high when they go low, charting us away from his predecessor's messes and to a forward-looking place.
82
President Obama has been more than gracious. He's had a sense of humor. He hasn't had any scandals during his administration. He was respectful towards all Americans no matter whether they voted for him or not. He has tried to make America a better place for all of us. He didn't indulge in the divisive rhetoric that the GOP has used for over 30 years. He didn't shirk some of the harder issues like gun control, climate change, or health care.
Did he have complete success? No, but no president or governor ever has that. Will he leave office having made America better? To some degree yes. If the GOP hadn't been so busy obstructing him he could have done more and they could have shared the glory. They did and there's no glory for them to share. One hopes that they are proud of themselves for being the party of NO.
Did he have complete success? No, but no president or governor ever has that. Will he leave office having made America better? To some degree yes. If the GOP hadn't been so busy obstructing him he could have done more and they could have shared the glory. They did and there's no glory for them to share. One hopes that they are proud of themselves for being the party of NO.
4
Not to mention the continuing "Kenyan Muslin" thing, which by some measure was and still is a "scandal" raised by one of the two major party candidates for president. President Obama continues to handle that with grace.
2
David Brooks!!!
Heal thyself.
Heal thyself.
33
Al Gore was gracious in defeat. Perhaps he should have been more Hillary, as we were left with the blood encrusted George W. Bush, who lied us into a war of aggression.
Our current President is gracious. Time after time he goes to Congress, that body that has done what it could to combine racism with the non-gracious politics of great inequality to mock and block him.
There are people dying from lack of housing, medical care, or hope (as they raise a rifle to their heads). Gracious America died many years ago. Two faced power politics is all that is left.
Hugh Massengill, Eugene
Our current President is gracious. Time after time he goes to Congress, that body that has done what it could to combine racism with the non-gracious politics of great inequality to mock and block him.
There are people dying from lack of housing, medical care, or hope (as they raise a rifle to their heads). Gracious America died many years ago. Two faced power politics is all that is left.
Hugh Massengill, Eugene
24
Problem is for her Republican haters apology won't do
They want her locked up
What David B writes works only with level headed and reasonable people. We don't have such people any more.
They want her locked up
What David B writes works only with level headed and reasonable people. We don't have such people any more.
14
David
"America is desperate for a little uplift, for a leader who shows that she trusts her fellow citizens."
If America is so desperate for this kind of leader why have so many vilified the one we already have? As gracious and uplifting a man as has ever been called "socialist, Kenyan colonialist, Muslim born in a foreign country with a secret plan to get your guns, gut the 2d amendment and destroy democracy"?
"America is desperate for a little uplift, for a leader who shows that she trusts her fellow citizens."
If America is so desperate for this kind of leader why have so many vilified the one we already have? As gracious and uplifting a man as has ever been called "socialist, Kenyan colonialist, Muslim born in a foreign country with a secret plan to get your guns, gut the 2d amendment and destroy democracy"?
86
Oh how I'm going to miss Obama and his family!!!!!
36
Republicans threw grace out the window with their dirty bath water years ago. Mr. Brooks, did you fail to watch the 11 hours long Benghazi witch hunt when Mrs. Clinton never once called the idiotic Trey Gowdy an idiot? That by itself was an act of grace.
Today's column also earns Mr. Brooks the Nobel Prize for understatement by mentioning only that Trump displays "ineptitude". How charitable and full of grace to not mention The Buffoon's vulgarity, stupidity and all the other graceless names he's earned.
Send this message of the need for grace and charity to McConnell and Ryan. They need it more than Hillary.
Today's column also earns Mr. Brooks the Nobel Prize for understatement by mentioning only that Trump displays "ineptitude". How charitable and full of grace to not mention The Buffoon's vulgarity, stupidity and all the other graceless names he's earned.
Send this message of the need for grace and charity to McConnell and Ryan. They need it more than Hillary.
1411
Well put. Mr. Brooks is one of the worst hypocrites in print today. He seems so nice, but just under the surface is the same old supply-side trickle-down fear mongering GOP. Yet he dares to talk about grace.
5
I agree, though Brooks' seems to assume that, since Trump will not become president, he isn't really relevant to this tale. Way too soon to make this assumption, in my (humble) opinion.
2
Happily, there is no Nobel Prize for understatement.
1
Sounds like Trump is gracious in David Brooks' world.
11
Trump has to learn
To listen to someone other than Ivanka for more than 30 seconds
To not stiff his contractors and sub-contractors
To pay his taxes
To read at a map ... heck, to read anything
To not shoot off his mouth when he hasn't the foggiest clue
To learn the rudiments of constitutional democracy ... heck to prove he can learn something new about anything
To not talk down to the minorities whose vote he is seeking
To stop demeaning women
To stop talking about hotness or the lack thereof unless it is in reference to climate change
To apologize in a meaningful way
To stop pandering to every prejudice and fear the right has stoked for 30 years.
To respect the result of a re-election instead of whining that his soon-to-be historic loss is "rigged".
To not unceasingly prevaricate
So, yes, let's talk about what Hillary has to learn about being gracious. Hold that thought while I fetch my tea and crumpet.
To listen to someone other than Ivanka for more than 30 seconds
To not stiff his contractors and sub-contractors
To pay his taxes
To read at a map ... heck, to read anything
To not shoot off his mouth when he hasn't the foggiest clue
To learn the rudiments of constitutional democracy ... heck to prove he can learn something new about anything
To not talk down to the minorities whose vote he is seeking
To stop demeaning women
To stop talking about hotness or the lack thereof unless it is in reference to climate change
To apologize in a meaningful way
To stop pandering to every prejudice and fear the right has stoked for 30 years.
To respect the result of a re-election instead of whining that his soon-to-be historic loss is "rigged".
To not unceasingly prevaricate
So, yes, let's talk about what Hillary has to learn about being gracious. Hold that thought while I fetch my tea and crumpet.
941
Hilary Clinton has had an extraordinary life, which comes with enormous responsibilities and, being in politics, enormous attacks. Do you expect her to trust and be gracious when Republicans have repeatedly gone after her on the global stage? She now has to be gracious? Really? Are you dating her? Have you asked any men to be gracious? Did anyone ever say Bush had to be gracious? The media has had a rather bizarre relationship tp both these candidates, which may reflect the American public but I wonder if the media were asked to only cover the issues related to governing the country and nothing else. What kind of campaign would we have then? Statemenship is what is missing from this campaign, on both sides. But we all have to take some of the blame for that and bear some of the burden of trying to bring the tenor of our politics back from the brink.
19
Thank you, Susan. Well said-
1
I too get frustrated with Ms. Clinton's (and President Obama's) response to Republican attacks. If armies of politicians and pundits were constantly taking apart everything you ever said or did, and putting it back together as part of a narrative to prove your evil intentions, how should you behave? Taking Mr. Brook's advice--behaving like a Christ figure, and turning yourself over heart and soul to those who wish you ill, will only empower evil, not defeat it. During Clinton's testimony at the Benghazi hearings, I kept thinking; why is she pretending that these are real questions? why is she dignifying these people with respect? I kept thinking she should look her inquisitors in the eye and say "this is a charade. You are should be ashamed."
26
Think you going to convert anyone reading this to drop Hillary and vote for Trump by pointing out that Hillary could be a tad more...gracious? David, you are a white man speaking to other white men. Talk like that isn't going to convince a lot of women folk to stay home on Election Day.
26
Ah, you know Mr. Brooks, you've just written an article about "graciousness" in leadership. It's a good idea, but it's a curiosity to me, in the face of all the ungraciousness we see in Mr. Trump, or for that matter, any Republican candidate for President in the pat decade (you do remember Mitt Romney and his "47%" speech, don't you?), that you say nothing about the current leader in the White House? Mr. Obama seems to be all that you say about a gracious leader, but there's not a hint in your column about him. The whole septic tide of abuse and lies unleashed by the Republicans against the man . . . and he emerges . . . gracious. And you have nothing to say about that? I've noticed this among Conservatives: a real lack of self-awareness. Maybe you should write a column about self-awareness. You might learn from the experience.
35
A little graciousness from the press would go a long way. Here is a leader who has been put through the literal wringer, for decades, and who is locked in an election against a Voldemort look alike. All the press seems to be able to do is present the case in a he said/she said style (see your front page today re: racism) in attempt to CYA their own reputation for objectivity. The idea that Trump gets to call her a bigot? A racist? After what he's said, multiple times, on film? With who is managing his campaign (Bannon and Ailes)? And you guys are still talking about pay to play when folks like Prince Bahrain would get a meeting with her whether or not he worked with the Clinton Foundation? You guys give Trump creedance when he calls her corrupt when he won't release his tax returns, and the press reports that with no comment. Really? The overweening desire to be "even-handed" in this coverage, when we all look back and reflect, is going to rank up there in the top 10 worst moments for our 4th Estate, right there with the reporting on the Sinking of the Maine, and the Aluminum Tubes.
30
There is no such thing as apology in this overly litigious overly sensationalized society.
2
Brooks dances around the issue of who he will vote for.
In the final analysis, I believe, he'll invoke some tortured "logic" to justify Trump, like the Republicans who voted for Sarah Palin.
Such is the life and vote of an unreconstructed ideologue.
In the final analysis, I believe, he'll invoke some tortured "logic" to justify Trump, like the Republicans who voted for Sarah Palin.
Such is the life and vote of an unreconstructed ideologue.
8
What bothers me more about this election is not what the scandals or business dealings are, and how graciously the candidates learn and react to them,is how the press /media make them the 'real' issues of the election by the people. So glad to hear that Donald is paranoid and Hillary is not healthy...
David line up the real issues pro's and con's of both candidates and how congress will react...and what about Wall St. interests? Give Americans the issues that are theirs and see how graciously we lead.
David line up the real issues pro's and con's of both candidates and how congress will react...and what about Wall St. interests? Give Americans the issues that are theirs and see how graciously we lead.
3
"Gracious people are humble enough to observe that the best things in life are usually undeserved."
David, at long last have you no sense of irony? For years, you have been the abettor of a party that represents a philosophy that is the very antithesis of this. It divides the world into the deserving and undeserving, the makers and the takers, the "real Americans" and the 47%. It is a party that worries incessantly about moral hazard, claiming that any generous act toward the less fortunate risks amplifying the malingering that it argues is the real source of their misfortune. If the Republicans of recent decades had had their way, they would reclaim what few "pennies of love" do exist and tuck them back into their own "well-deserved" accounts. Please, David, spare us the lectures on graciousness!
David, at long last have you no sense of irony? For years, you have been the abettor of a party that represents a philosophy that is the very antithesis of this. It divides the world into the deserving and undeserving, the makers and the takers, the "real Americans" and the 47%. It is a party that worries incessantly about moral hazard, claiming that any generous act toward the less fortunate risks amplifying the malingering that it argues is the real source of their misfortune. If the Republicans of recent decades had had their way, they would reclaim what few "pennies of love" do exist and tuck them back into their own "well-deserved" accounts. Please, David, spare us the lectures on graciousness!
31
So neo-con apologist David Brooks is now praising Dorothy Day! This election cycle is getting weirder by the moment. Does Mr. Brooks have any understanding how sexist his call for Hillary to be "gracious" is? I wonder if he has ever encouraged Mitch McConnell to be "gracious"?
30
Michael Gera: Nope.
1