‘The Night Of’ Season 1, Episode 5: Seeing Naz in a New Light

Aug 07, 2016 · 77 comments
Rami (NY)
"Two people of middle eastern descent" except one is of North African and the other is of Pakistani descent ...
Tom (San Francisco)
I picked up on this too and I was a bit taken aback. Especially ironic coming from an NY Times review, given that this is exactly the kind of ignorance that the central character has to battle on the street in episode 1, and would has been discussed in this column.
KK (San Francisco Bay Area)
The other thing that's bothering me......since when are doctors so mean, sarcastic and terribly uncaring to their patients? I don't understand why the writers are characterizing Stone's doctors like they are a bunch of A-holes who have about as much bedside manners as carnival workers? Its the strangest thing.
carolnyc (New York, NY)
Welcome to NYC!
KayCee (NY metro)
Have you been to a dermatologist lately? Many are more interested in securing theater tickets, or checking their portfolios than assisting patients.
macktan (tennessee)
All of us have a dark side that we are able to suppress under good conditions. Isn't this why so many people go to church--original sin and all that jazz? But, if you sign up for the military, it's okay if you kill people. If you become president of the US, it's okay if you create an assassination list and bomb cities day in and day out, killing countless innocent people in the process.

Just because Naz took adderall and lied about it does not mean he has latent criminal tendencies. Most people won't admit to these little sins. And anyone going to Rikers who can see that they probably won't survive the month is either going to concede defeat or fight for their life. Hmmm. If I had my bed burned, then my body burned by inmates, I'd probably fight for my life and swallow a few 8 balls myself. What should Naz do? Complain to the guards?

In The Prophet, we start out with a homeless boy who's a petty thief. He's forced to kill or be killed himself. Yes, he does change, but ironically he also betters himself. He learns to read in prison, he learns another language, he improves his communication skills. Sure, he's a criminal, but as just another poor Algerian felon, he really had no chance in life among the sea of poor, uneducated minority felons. He'll have a short life, but he'll have some money in his pocket and an ability to pay the rent.
Neal (New York, NY)
What a great way to end an episode. Blue lights. Very dramatic and suspenseful cliffhanger as Turturro stumbles into a Wal-Mart.

Spoiler alert: the cat did it. That's why Turturro is bribing it with toys. Anybody else notice there's no litter box?
JR (<br/>)
I noticed. No litter box, no water, and no companionship.
Poor kitty.
DEA (Boston)
Yes, any cat owner would notice that. If Stone did not put a littler box in the room he is in for a surprise when he goes in there!
Anne (NH)
I am sure I saw him put a litter box in there...I'll look again.
Chris (Bronx)
We don't know much about Naz or Stone. So it's difficult to tell whether Naz is a quiet kind of timid person or an aggressive type. I think we will see that he's not as naive as we expect. This episode showed a bit of who Stone is. He seems to have some street smarts and knows how to play the system.

I was glad to finally see a bit of information come out. Naz's toxicology report and who the missing man is. (Duane Reade)
Mike (MI)
doesn't Freddy have the chessboard set up wrong? Is that why Naz is smiling?
Mike (MI)
doesn't Freddy have the chessboard set up wrong? Is that why Naz seems to be smiling?
silty (sunnyvale, ca)
I'm a little confused as to Allison's Crowe and her firm's involvement in Naz's case. First, her personality is so unpleasant that we assume she must have some ulterior motive for helping Naz pro bono in the first place, though we can't see what that motive might be. Then in episode 4, after Naz refuses to admit guilt, she informs Naz's parents that she cannot proceed further without payment which they can't afford, so one assumes she's out and Stone may be back in. And then she flat out quits. But somehow her law firm, in the person of her employee Chandra, stays on the case. Chandra spends $500 of the firms's money for the info on Andrea from the rehab facility, even before any recompense for the firm is arranged. And in episode 5, Chandra and Stone come to some arrangement whereby Stone will be paid $30K, but by whom? By Crowe's law firm? And where will the firm get the money?

Also, I was disappointed that Weiss was revealed as an evil person, when she solicits false testimony from the pathologist. It would have been more interesting if the story hinged around basically good people in conflict rather than manufacture a villain. And I agree with others that the writers are way overdoing it with how the world humiliates and underestimates John Stone. People are saying things they never would in real life.
Netflox (New York, NY)
Weiss is not being revealed as an evil person. She didn't solicit false testimony, just steered the coroner toward one particular answer. Not the right thing to do, but not exactly evil. Also, it's clear that Crowe's motive was to build publicity by representing Naz and settling the case quickly. Then Naz crossed her, necessitating a long and expensive trial, so she washed her hands of the case.
Bob (DC)
I found your last comment amusing. People may not say such rude things in Sunnyvale but the show takes place in NYC.
silty (sunnyvale, ca)
No, the pathologist made it clear to Weiss that he didn't know how Naz's hand was lacerated, but if she wanted him to testify that it was by handling a knife, he was willing to do it, and she accepted that. That means Weiss is armed with testimony she knows is false. We will see if she decides to actually present it as evidence in trial. If she does, she's a villain. She's already got one foot over a line she never should have come near.
Netflox (New York, NY)
Not that it matters, but the DA didn't offer Trevor a cookie. She told him to take the cookie with him that he had already started.
LAJ (Rochester, NY)
Why wouldn't Hitler, had he lived, been tried at Nuremberg with the rest of the Nazi leaders? They all had lawyers.
Tony Thomas (Motown)
Exactly. The correct answer, which even a child could understand, is that Hitler gets a lawyer because we have faith in the justice system. He was guilty and he would be found guilty.
KayCee (NY metro)
Or as Stone stated to Naz, guilt or innocence have nothing to do with it.
Susan (New York, NY)
Another excellent episode. The scene with the DA and the coroner was enlightening....I don't trust the DA. I don't trust the cops either. And the cat...again....it makes me wonder.
KK (San Francisco Bay Area)
Being an avid trial watcher and a watcher of lots o British murder mystery series, I can't help wondering about a couple of things: Unless Naz had time to clean up, he had absolutely no blood splatters on him, except for where his hand carried the knife. The way Andrea's wall and bed looked, he would have had blood splatter all over him. Also, the way she was savagely, brutally murdered, it seemed typical of a crime of passion, not a crime of opportunity. Someone really hated her. (Kind of like what Jodi Arias did to Travis). And for the love of God would someone PLEASE figure out that the freaking back door was open!!
LAJ (Rochester, NY)
Did she leave it open when she let the cat out? If so, that's why the cat seems to have such an out-sized presence in this series!
DD (NY)
Agreed. I was wondering why that very obvious point, almost no blood on Naz hasn't been discussed by both sides from day 1.
Ali (Brooklyn)
I just posted about the same thing! It's been driving me crazy that it has not been brought up on the show.
artboy13 (los Angeles CA)
I've been watching violence on TV since they they plugged it in-62 years ago. Nothing really gets to me. I can't take the feet!! I gag. The chopstick is the queasiest utensil in Manhattan. I can't face Saran Wrap. Crisco is not crossing the threshold. I had a friend with Renal Cell Cancer who bathed in bleach on the advice of his nutcase GF. Sadly, it didn't help. Feets please fail me now!!
P (NJ)
:-)
KayCee (NY metro)
Actually a small amount of bleach, diluted in a large amount of water is theorized to kill yeast on the body. But then, the dermatologists are busy getting theater tickets, right?
fastfurious (the new world)
Another terrific episode.

Wonderful cameo from Richard Price as the Viagra dealer.
John O'Hagan (Birmingham, AL)
The feeling I was left with at the end of episode 4 and now confirmed in 5 by the chess game, blood offering, "I like it." comment and the eightballs, is that Freddy has a new best friend and protege and will have no trouble keeping him home and safe at Rikers. Much like Stone locking up the cat. The trial is pointless as far as Naz's future is concerned. Still, would be nice to find out who done it.
Ali (Brooklyn)
Ok, apologies in advance if this has been addressed before, but if Naz killed wouldn't he have been absolutely drenched in her blood? And since he wasn't, wouldn't this be something the defense would jump on? This has been nagging at me since episode one and every time her blood splatter wall and blood soaked mattress are shown.
David Foster Wallace (Chicago)
It's not a prison, its a jail. And pretty much everyone takes a plea (90%+), so a wait for a trial will take much longer than a few days or weeks. Naz hooking up with the boss con seems more like good fortune than being a victim.

He got an incredibly favorable plea deal, but turned it down. Stone thinks he might be innocent, unlike all his other clients. Who are guilty. Prison's aren't full of innocent people. Or casual, non violent drug dealers. The least realistic aspect of the series is that he's innocent.

Ketamine explains a lot. Namely waking up next to the refrigerator. It also means that Naz's memory is unreliable.

Duane looked guilty from the moment he appeared in episode 1, but attribute that to racial stereotyping. But then, it turns out he has both a record and uses knives.
macktan (tennessee)
If you are arrested and you are poor and a minority, it's pretty easy to convince you to take a plea deal. Why? Because without "real" legal representation which only money can buy, you will be found guilty. Why? Because you are poor and a minority and your word won't be believed over the police and prosecutor. So you can chance a trial and get 30 years or take a plea and get 1 yr.

Khalif Browder, a poor, black teen, was accused of taking a backpack and arrested. He refused to take a plea and was sent to Rikers while his case was very slowly adjudicated. Unable to afford bail, he spent 3 years in Rikers awaiting a trial, the court and prosecutor angry that he just wouldn't plead out. Unlike Naz, he had no protectors in Rikers and was assaulted by both inmates and guards. After 3 years, his charges were dropped. Yes, the experience changed him as it would anyone. He was traumatized. Unable to cope with the trauma and depression, he committed suicide soon after his release.

If you are poor and a minority, an arrest over the smallest thing--such as not using your blinker when changing lanes--can alter your life.
robert forte (nyc)
Nobody gets arrested for not using a blinker.
Shellbrav (Buckeye Az)
I love the cat & Stone's way of being humanized by his benign caring for it.
Lois Courtney (Corvallis. Oregon)
I thought when Naz went upstairs there was a kind of hat, like a cowboy hat, hanging on the deer's head, and it was gone when he went back up the next morning from the kitchen. Which made me think its owner was the killer. Did I imagine that?
Judith (Bronx, NY)
Hello, all. I felt that this episode contained the best and the worst of Steve Zaillian--meaning that the explosive scene with Naz summoning his rage and brutalizing his attacker was the most effective. But a lot of time was wasted in the John Stone-as-Laughingstock subplot; why the classroom? And the Viagra? The failed attempt with the prostitute? Why the prostitute at all? All the ridicule distracts from the story of Stone's growth as an attorney. I can get him Stone turning Trevor, who's clearly an undeveloped person who now needs his help. And what about the other good scene, with Stone and Chandra questioning Naz and Stone calling him out on his lie about the tox report? Stone's line about the drugs was restrained but stern, just the sort of message and tone Naz needed.

There were some other sloppy moments. I agree with the commenter who said that Helen would not toss Trevor so quickly; he's the only witness they have who saw Naz entering the crime scene. And yes, Box's diligence is to be commended. But you tell me why someone driving from Jackson Heights to the Lower East Side would take the Queens Midtown Tunnel. That's a slip in the writing. Sorry, folks. Let's hope for better in episode 6. Let's get on with the story--there are only 3 episodes left.
Robert Dana (11937)
Comic relief. Shakespeare did it all the time. Even in Hamlet where everyone but Horatio dies.
JR (<br/>)
And it gives us more insight into Stone's character on a personal (rather than professional) level. In his own way, he's a pariah too, and so can identify with Naz.
Stevieaa (Brooklyn NY)
I grew up in Queens and my Dad and I agree that the tunnel would be the absolute fastest way to get to the LES. The bridge would require another 25 blocks of driving in Manhattan, and the Brooklyn/Williamsburg bridoes would require many more miles of driving and the dreaded BQE.
I'm hoping a NYC cabbie sees this and weighs in.
Robert Dana (11937)
One can (and many do) say that Naz's change is abrupt. But I don't see it that way.

From the first episode, Naz has displayed a Mother Theresa-like patience when things don't go as planned.

Recall his friend (& ride) backing out of accompanying him to the party - a party Naz desperately wanted to attend. One in which he might "fit- in".

Other events of that night - wide ranging in severity - elicited little reaction (let alone outrage) from Naz. Recall how long he sat in that patrol car? Not a peep.

When we meet his parents we see that behavior again. Calm. Accepting of the wheel of fate without much demonstration. Maybe it's Naz's upbringing. Or an ethnic trait. Or, as I prefer, being strangers in a strange land not wanting to be noticed or make waves. Add to the mix their religion and the need to be doubly careful in a post 9/11 America. (Would work for me.)

In any event, once his life gets seriously threatened - burning bed, acid bath, knife attack - he was able to modify his behavior knowing he could obtain Freddie's offer of protection.

Agreeing to Freddie's protection, allows him to drop his guard. A guard he's always had to keep up as a Muslim and child of immigrants from a suspect land.

So, for me, it's not so much an abrupt change but changed circumstances. In a way, Naz is safer inside with Freddie's formidable protection than outside in New York.

What do you all think?
Robert Dana (11937)
Survival is the common thread, which makes Naz's behavior consistent. (Pushed send too soon.)
Joshim (Easton, PA)
I don't buy Naz's transformation. He had been 100% passive and now becomes an animal. It shows that the actor is good because he can play two different characters.
Kate N (Santa Clarita, CA)
I think Improv is on to something. Interesting that the inmate calling Naz a "faggot" is what set him off--did Naz have trouble with Andrea? Is he deeply closeted?
KayCee (NY metro)
I think you may be reading too much into it.
Tom Lynch (Tampa)
Dear Scott Tobias,

Naz is not "of Middle Eastern descent." He is of Pakistani ethnicity. That is, originating fron the Asian sub-continent.

Also, he swallowed "the eightballs," not "the eight balls."
SP (New York, NY)
Seriously... even the Times can't get this right... that's depressing.
Robert Dana (11937)
Lighten up. I don't for a second think Mr. Tobias meant eight (8) balls. He merely put a space between the word eight and balls. This is proper usage.
SP (New York, NY)
I was talking about the "of Middle Eastern descent" comment...
Dennis P King (Mount Shasta Ca.)
Shasta Dog

They are always flashing to the dear head with the glass eye on the wall. I still think there is something there besides empty space. The seeds of doubt about Naz have been planted in the past episodes by those guys on designer drugs and no memory of their deeds. I still hope Naz is innocent, though he will be a changed a man even if he is.
jbtunis (CA)
I think there may be a camera hidden in the deer head.
Ophelia (Mountain View, CA)
I agree. Almost looks like it could be some kind of nanny-cam set up inside the deer's head. And what about that creepy step-father? There's more to learn about him as well, plus the broken latch on the gate at the rear of the brownstone.
P (NJ)
In the first episode there was a (cowboyish) hat on the deer head. Then there wasn't when Naz left in the morning. Hmmmmm.
Oz G (Brooklyn, NY)
I think ALL lawyers are trained to answer the Hitler question. I was surprised Stone was dumbfounded. He just had to say, "My just is not to set bad guys free. My job is to make sure my client gets a fair trial where evidence is untainted and witnesses are truthful."
blessinggirl (Durham NC)
John Turturro deserves an Emmy. Those who find Naz's transition incredulous have never lived in a "bad" neighborhood, and surely have never been to prison. Further, Naz's violent behavior was a predictable release of rage, not an uncovering of some dark personality. Wouldn't you be enraged if you decided to chuck your pleasantly circumscribed life for a sexual experience and ended up caged like an animal? This series has a higher purpose than entertainment. It is trying to show the fortunate the manifest unfairness of the criminal justice system, that poor people serve lifetimes in prison because they don't have the money for lawyers and forensic teams, that prosecutors bend the facts to win.
dixie j (maui)
i second the nomination of John Turturro for an Emmy.
Robert Dana (11937)
Not so sure this show is Exhibit A to demonstrate, as you say, the manifest unfairness of our criminal justice system. And that is precisely why the show is so good - (in addition to all of the scenes in which Mr. Tutorro appears).

The evidence from the state's perspective is pretty overwhelming. In light of the circumstances, the state is not unreasonable in its sole focus on Naz. It's not like they fabricated anything.

If anything, Box played a little 'fast & lose' with Naz's Fifth Amendment rights. I don't recall Naz being Mirandized when the investigation focused on him, which is when that right is triggered. His monologue in close proximity to Naz, calculated for Naz to hear and react to, was suspect.

On the other hand, Naz had a very high priced, seasoned trial attorney who, at least, initially, agreed to do the case for free. And even after her withdrawal, it looks like the firm is footing much of the fees and expenses.

Nazis in pretty good hands with John and Chandra.
silty (sunnyvale, ca)
The state acted in good faith, it seems, until this episode. Weiss solicits false testimony from the pathologist regarding Naz's hand wound, or at least, does not object when he proffers it.
mediumlatte (rockville, md)
Maybe the Duane Reade scene is just a nightmare from the high dose steroids that Stone is on. Stone chasing down Duane Reade does not seem plausible, as is tracking him down so easily.
oraclesandarch (east hampton, ny)
Question: Does anyone know how to find the BBC show, Criminal Justice, on which The Night Of is based? It stars Ben Wishaw, as the Naz character, but not as a Pakistani, but a White working class Brit. And there is a Detective Box because, hey, how could even Richard Price improves on that name.
noffan (brooklyn)
Hulu
SValle (California)
BBC's "Criminal Justice" is available on hulu.
BL (D.C.)
Streaming on Hulu or buy it on Amazon.
oraclesandarch (east hampton, ny)
Sadly, last night's episode was a real disappointment from Naz's "where did that come from" transformation from wimp to assassin, to Stone's, in sandals no less, hot pursuit of Duane Reade down your proverbial dark alley. Richard Price, what the heck happened?
dixie j (maui)
i thot Stone was credible chasing after Duane. Sometimes folks of certain dont always act in predictable ways....they can take a chance now and again, just for the hell of it.
cc (brooklyn)
thought this episode wandered into modern crime story cliches to a disappointing extent -- the vain romantic pursuit of a prostitute by Stone, the gratuitous autopsy shots, the creepy M.E. There's really been too much Stone on the whole, even leaving aside the eczema narrative. At this point I would have preferred some more focus on Chandra, Box, or the Khan family.
Alan (Seattle)
What's with the faulty back door at the scene of the crime? Doesn't it seem more should be done with that clue?
famdoc (New York, NY)
Naz hasn't passed one eight ball and the ones he passed looked pretty ratty. Are we in for a poisoned mule story line, one which will reveal Naz as a prison mule to an enlarging circle, perhaps the prosecution team?

I agree the transition from meek college kid to prison thug was all-too-abrupt to be fully believable.

Love the soundtrack accompanying Stone's caring for the cat--mid-70s love songs, including The Carpenters.
DSM (Westfield)
Excellent summary, but the least credible episode by far:

*Naz's change is too abrupt--especially how jacked up he looks

*Stone would have pushed Naz harder to grow his hair back

*The prosecutor would not have written off Trevor as a witness--he is the only witness she has to place Naz at the townhouse before the crime

*Trevor gives up Duane too easily

*Stone risking his life to confront Duane (after finding Duane instantly) is absurd

The previews suggest a revelation about Naz switching schools is coming
Andrew (Vancouver)
Totally agree. Less believable. How did John find Duane so easily? Unless I missed something, that just seemed like weak storytelling
Neal Schmidt (New Jersey)
The idea that given the high profile nature of the accused that he would be in the general prison population rather than in protective custody is absurd to begin with. Remember he is a front page/Nancy Grace celebrity. The warden has a lot to lose if something really bad was to happen to him. His lawyers never even asked him how it was going in there to try to protect him. The whole prison narrative is ridiculous.
IMPROV (Mt Kisco NY)
Were Stone's libido-stunting steroid issues and his thoughts on what the woman's then supposed to say/do also intended to plant the seed in our minds that a similar issue for Naz and an unkind response might have set him off during The Night Of? The show's still gripping, but credulity was stretched tonight in a way the would have even challenged Mister Fantastic. Naz is now a beefy, head-shaving, remote control hogging tough (though reluctant to mule eight balls)? Stone chases down blind alleys and dark basements after Duane Reade (after interestingly introducing himself as Trevor's lawyer)? And not one, but at least two NYC pharmacies are out of Viagra???
DD (NY)
This episode felt off to me. Naz's transition from lamb to lion seems too abrupt. There has never been even a hint of a dark, angry soul simmering inside him and I didn't buy it. Also Stone pursuing Trevor seemed implausible. He's a bright guy. Surely he know's physically he was no match, especially if he might be a brutal killer. Glad kitty got home. Meh.
ban (pa)
I think you mean Stone was pursuing Duane Reade not Trevor.
G. Adair (Knoxville, TN)
A less than perfect episode, I agree. But I think there was a hint of Naz's suppressed rage in episode 1 when he chose to confront Trevor over the "bombs" comment outside Andrea's apartment.
DD (NY)
Yes thanks! Sidebar, also enjoying Jeannie Berlin's performance immensely. Her scene coaching the ME for his witness stand performance was a very frightening glimpse into how the criminal justice system operates, if credible.