Tightwad Trump Explodes

Jun 02, 2016 · 708 comments
John (Toronto)
How is it that national polls show Hillary ahead by two points? This guy is a joke.
Flatiron (Colorado)
Will the check bounce? Keep following the money!
JessiePearl (<br/>)
Please. Gail. Don't. ever. quit. this. job. We need you.
Babs (Richmond, VA)
"See if that makes you feel any better"??

No, sadly, very little about this election year makes me feel "better."
Joe From Boston (Massachusetts)
If Trump is elected POTUS the Canadians will build a wall on the border and send the bill to the US.
Richard (<br/>)
You go, girl! (Or: Way to wield the written word, woman!) You made me laugh, and you skillfully skewered Daffy Donald simultaneously. What more can one ask for?
Martha (Baltimore)
Bob Dole used to talk about Bob Dole, too.
Chris W. (Arizona)
Mr. Trump is an obvious presidential candidate . . . for the Tea Party. With him and Sarah as his right-hand woman the reality show would not have to end in November.
Marcus Aurelius (Terra Incognita)
@charlspa
(I repost to cure typos.)

"You obviously want to make readers think you have a reason to see his tax returns that has no relationship to his net worth. Or you do not understand what you are writing."

Her intent IS to mislead and her lack of understanding is just frosting on the cake of deception...
John (Tennessee)
Until the primaries began, I had a real problem with Clinton - there always seemed to be a cloud over both of them. Between the travel office firings, the $250,000 speeches, her healthcare debacle, the e-mails...but Donald Trump changed all that. This dude has lied publicly in one week more than Clinton has lied publicly since 1992!
I would sleep poorly with Clinton has President. I WOULDN'T sleep with Trump in the oval office. There's no TELLING what he might do...and then lie about.
trblmkr (NYC!)
Love you Gail but I must protest. The Times is also guilty of not following up. You wrote:
"People, I know you’re tired of hearing Donald Trump stories, but did you want the reporters to just drop the subject?"

After the recent Nevada primary the Times and others reported "death threats" made to Nevada state Democrat Lange. In subsequent days, the Times, in many articles, referenced the "threats" ("death" was mysteriously dropped) in relation to the Sanders campaign.

Death threats, if made across state lines telephonically or via text,twitter,etc.,are a federal crime! Surely you don't want your colleagues to drop the subject.
I keep asking about this but apparently the trail has gone cold.
Rich (Tucson)
I think Gail Collins has the right idea....destroy Trump by making him the butt of jokes that are too clever for him to understand. He will get it that people are making fun of him. He just won't understand exactly why. He may have an apoplectic fit as things go from bad to worse for his campaign. He is pretty darn close to maxing out his voter base. He is waiting on the Bernie Bros to join him, but once Sanders is eliminated they are more likely to support Jill Stein or even Gary Johnson than Trump... unless Sanders does the ultimate betrayal of his own principles and runs as an independent just to take enough votes away from Clinton to give Trump a win. That would result in a disaster for America, but it would put Sanders where he would need to be if he did that...on the bottom of the trash heap of history.
Grover (NY)
On a related Trump topic – –

Has anyone else noticed that Donald Trump has absolutely no sense of humor? We have seen him on TV for months now. Try to conjure a mental picture of Donald Trump laughing. You can't do it, can you?

No sense of humor? Always a very bad sign.
Roy Brophy (Minneapolis, MN)
Trump may use Veterans as props but Warrior Queen Hillary has gotten them wounded and killed in her unending support of our oil wars for the 1%. Her crazy Neocon idea that Iraqis will come to love us and give us their oil is as crazy as anything Trump has to say.
Bill Clinton was just as much of a draft dodger as Trump or Cheney and no one in the Clinton Clan will ever serve in the military.
I'm a Vietnam Veteran and think both Hillary and Trump are dangerous and ether one will get more of our troops killed.
Jarhead (Maryland)
Please God, provide a third-party option to...

Trump or Hillary.

Two, self-centered, dishonest people. This I pray. Amen.
Bill Lutz (PA)
All this outrage (and justifiable) yet people are still voting for Trump.
America the Stupid flourishes freely in the USA.
Daniel Locker (Brooklyn)
We we have Trump today in response to the worst president of our times, Barack. Did you see him pandering to the Japanese at Hiroshima? If the Dems don't put that Socialist Bernie out to pasture immediately, Trump could be our next president instead of Hillary. Our bad times in this country can to laid right at the feet of the Democratic Party.
Leo Pelliccia (Canada)
I think it's pretty funny watching the press trying to get Trump. It always backfires and they end up looking stupid. Trump is smarter than you.He'll win every time, so keep trying and thanks for the free publicity.
Guy (NYC)
It's good to see the media begin to thoroughly investigate "Poor Donald." Thanks
Charles Mayer (Scarsdale, NY)
Bernie Sanders seems to refer to himself in the third person at least as often as Trump does.
Pedro G (Arlington, Va)
Don't underestimate Trump's abilities with the media. I watched as an NBC News reporter described a Midwest Trump rally as "packed" while the entire upper section behind her was clearly empty. Every seat.

How did Trump win the nomination? With eager assistance.
James Tynes (Hattiesburg, Ms)
Trump's concern for veteran's issues or any issues other than Trump
is a very recent phenomenon that goes back to the day when he needed
props to make up for his comments about McCain, who was, unlike Trump,
an actual veteran and a hero.
Very likely Trump's 'foot thing' that saved him from becoming a veteran was because he can't keep his foot out of his big mouth.
Trumpit (L.A.)
Trump gave $1,000,000 to help veterans? Wow, he is quite generous. I haven't given 5 cents, except through my taxes, have you?
lesothoman (NYC)
Trump knows nothing of military or public service. His only interest is in self-service. As I said, he knows nothing..... and even if he loses the November election, it is already a major blot on these United States that so many in the electorate have been duped and seduced by this fraudulent nobody.
TheraP (Midwest)
Remember how last week Trump was all ready to debate Sanders "to raise money for women's health" - which thankfully he pulled back from. But it just made me sick that creepy Don Juan wanted to pander to women. And likely keep the donations for months - to feed his campaign.

He showed his pandering and then his cowardice.

So glad no reporters had to pull teeth for that money too.

Keep up the pressure on this sleazy con man. Do not leave one stone unturned in his endless scams he calls deals.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
Are you reading the same statements as everyone else?

"It's plainly obvious as to why Trump is so secretive about his finances: He is not worth $10B. I'm not even sure if he's worth $1B."

Frankly, if he's NOT worth $10 billion, I'm even more impressed. In last week's 102- page financial disclosure statement, he reported $615,000,000 in income since early 2015 (up from $380 million for the year earlier, as he disclosed last year). If he earned that much on, say, a $1 billion net worth, that was quite a performance.

$615,000,000 in income doesn't prove Trump is worth $10 billion, of course -- nor would tax returns. But $615,000,000 in income certainly is consistent with a $10 billion net worth.

Have you looked at his 102-page financial disclosure statement? I believe it's public. Take a look and let us all know what you think.
jp (hoboken,nj)
So Trump collected about $5.6million from individuals for the benefit of veterans. How does this work now - does he claim the whole 5.6m as his own tax deduction for 2016?
MCV207 (San Francisco)
Did anyone else notice the faces of the veterans lined up as human props behind Trump? They looked truly pained every time he went "off" on the target of the minute. I really felt for them, no matter their political affiliation.

Most non-zealots are now realizing Trump is a borderline Tourette/Asperger case - no control over what spews out or when. Yeah, let's send him to the UN General Assembly - the speech would rival Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for incoherence. Our economy would crater as the G20 countries pulled out of investing here.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
Be careful what you wish for:

"Hopefully, in a not-too-future speech, we'll hear Trump declare that we 'won't have The Donald Trump to kick around anymore.'"

That line was made famous by Richard Nixon -- in 1962, during his post-election press conference after losing the CA governor's race to Pat Brown.

As we all well know, we ended up having Nixon to kick around a lot longer.
Fishtown Greg (Valley Forge, PA)
A few months ago, I revisited VietNam where I served for thirteen months after I got out of college. A friend and a fellow vet went with my wife and I. One of our stops was in Hanoi at the Hanoi Hilton. Although the jail was sanitized and highly propagandized, and made to appear as a model prison, the compound was chilling and one could understand the brutality and depredation that American POWs faced. I found it hard to imagine how John McCain could have survived, let alone took the moral stand he did while imprisoned, putting other soldiers ahead of him for repatriation and rescue.
I hated the war, but I served. I enlisted because I felt it was my duty as a citizen. I grew up in a blue collar neighborhood in Philadelphia and I still remember, when young, my father explaining to me what a Gold Star Banner was that hung in a neighbor's front window. I have a PH, ARCOM and AMs, and I have never regretted I did my part, and did not need to be thanked.
I was so repulsed by the whole spectacle of the baboon named Trump attacking a real hero like John McCain. I could not believe this repulsion could have been exceeded, but it has with the antics of Trump and the contributions, made only after the WashPo cornered him, he had promised and never intended to make. Then, one of the organizations has an "F" rating from an independent charity evaluator.
Most of all, I am appalled at the blind support that Trump gets from Republicans, it is like Dumb and Dumber.
Bisquit (Texas)
Again I must ask why everyone is warning us to look out for the man who has been yelling fire on our burning ship. He may be a terrible choice. But the ship is on fire and nobody is even talking about it here.
Richard Blanc (Connecticut)
if he is actually "joking" with many of these off the cuff lines, he simply isn't funny...and if he isn't joking, just spewing gibberish and then having to backtrack...well, that isn't funny either. It's frightening that a presidential candidate speaks like a 5th grader on a playground. It's scary that a presidential candidate that speaks in xenophobic, mysoginistic drivel has a supposedly large following. What does that say about the people calling names, throwing punches, holding TRUMP signs and wearing those dopey hats at his rallies? They simply aren't listening to what is coming out of this candidate's mouth or don't care because they feel they are part of some New American Dream Hopefully the 70% of moderate Americans who have yet to speak, will do so in November and put at end to the nightmare of this insane race for the Presidency
mkraishan (Virginia)
I am amazed at the Republicans.

They are all macho but seem to cower in fear before a buffoon and a clown like Donald Trump! Not one of them dares to stand up and say that Trump has not a single republican ideal in his bones unless it is a self-serving tax cut.

They are all cowards in my book starting with Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell. They should have heeded the calls of George Will and dump this guy even if it cost them the elections. Instead, they have chosen self-destruction. Serves them well.
DeathbyInches (Arkansas)
Really, I haven't seen anything as fake as Donald Trump since I spotted a set of Lee Press On Nails on the fingers of a tarty looking woman at the grocery store many years ago. Trump is funny, but his supporters are scary!

Stephan Hawking said that Trump appeals to the lower common denominator. I've spent all my life trying to rise as far above the lower common denominator as I could manage. Just being called Common when I was growing up was an awful thing.

I worry that American voters may have slipped under the waves & are swimming in a sea of stupid. No one will win if this country is taken over by the most stupid among us. And there's no better tool in the Oligarch's tool chest than stupid people. The Republicans in Congress these last 8 years have been an excellent preview of how it would work if terminally stupid people take over our government.

Trump supporters, nay, all of the Tea Party persuasion are mean & mad & without a clue. The Tea Party people I know aren't very bright, they're not very well educated, a few could barely be called Middle Class & apparently they're mad because it HAS to be the fault of someone else (black people) that they're not rich & famous today. These same people don't want tax money spent on education & since most are armed to the teeth they must want to go back to the days of the Wild West.

I could have just said Trump supporters are nuts. They should buy <--- I'm With Stupid & call it good. Be smarter people!
Kelly (New Jersey)
My dear old dad, a navy corpsman who among other engagements during World War II, was part of a surgical team that tried its best to put wounded Marines taken off the beaches of Iwo Jima back together, had a pejorative for guys like Donald Trump. He'd say about loud mouthed braggarts especially, "he's as phony as a three dollar bill." Given the four bankruptcies, the failure to disclose his tax returns, his fraudulent 'university' and his delayed payment to veteran's groups Mr. Trump fits the bill perfectly and heretofore should be referred to as- Three Dollar Donald.
Georgee (Baltimore)
I would love to see commentary from Gail on how Mr. Trump would fare, if elected, as an employee of the federal government.
Marcia (Texas)
I've been chuckling for weeks, under my breath, with the awareness that the only way to really, really get under Trump's skin (you're right, Gail) is to expose his financial un-truths, stinginess, tax evasion and, yes, make him spend his own money. As much as we can make him spend! He stated that if he doesn't get elected President it will have been a waste of money and energy. Hey ... let's help him waste both. (And, BTW, what an awful and pitiful statement to have made about the highest office in our land, the Leader of the Free World. Tsk. Tsk.)
Al Luongo (San Francisco)
When all three branches of the government are completely in Republican hands, and we realize that these guys, guess what, couldn't care less for us after all, just used us as pawns to get in, and are busily engaged in enriching themselves even more and grinding the rest of us into the dust, the people who were bamboozled into voting for them will still find a way to blame the Democrats.
Perry (Los Angeles)
Trump should have to account for why his million dollars was not the first to be donated. His money went to a group run by one of his employees that manages one of his hotels. The vetting excuse is pretty lame.
robert garcia (Reston, VA)
The CDC will never find out what scatological specimen Trump is. He can not be quarantined. It seems their best recourse is the incinerator.
Pinotpomeroy (IA)
If Trump get elected, I guess the country will get the type of president that the majority of (electoral college) voters deserve. Scary.
Cody McCall (Tacoma)
The Donald is the most repugnant public figure I've ever seen. The question is, how did such a loathsome person ever maneuver himself into such a position of social prominence and apparent wealth? A big mouth and a fat wallet? I mean, what's his 'appeal' and, more troubling, why?
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
The really big problem for Clinton is that relatively few undecided voters are likely to support her. Some will, of course, but most undecided voters are likely to vote for Trump.
TheraP (Midwest)
I still think a fake White House on an island with "the men in white coats" (as we used to call them) disguised as a Palace Guard, maybe gussied up in uniforms like the Vatican Swiss Guards, perhaps a band playing "Hail to the Thief" and a fake TV station broadcasting adulation from a manufactured crowd (the way cheap movies do it) would keep Trump the Tot happy. Maybe for the rest of his life. He could issue edits and lawsuits every day of the week. And cheat his way through a round of golf a day.

Let him have his fantasy. And we can keep our country.
Robert Haberman (Old Mystic Ct.)
As we get closer and closer to the election the questions will get tougher and tougher and the Trump responses will get nastier and nastier, and eventually either he or the GOP will have a nervous breakdown.
WM (Claremont, CA)
Facts and accuracy don't seem to dent the Donald. Humor, ridicule, deflation, mockery will, I think, prove the only way to take him down.
de Rigueur (here today)
I am pretty surprised he does not have a history of generous giving for a) taxes and b) the social climbers guide to the NY circuit. (Maybe my understanding of that system died years ago with my very old frothy magazine subscription.)

I never noticed before how lIke GW Bush he is; so resentful and childish and touchy..and they also share a few bankruptcies. But even Bush Jr. drew the line at outright sneering American heroes and left that for the swift boaters.

Trump is the new version that outright takes personal control of his vile messaging. As his iceberg breaks off and floats away he will have absolutely no way back.
Ethan Bolker (Boston, MA)
Gail: please add John Kerry to this short list

One of the very few major American politicians who did serve, under fire, is John McCain,

... and we know what swift-boating did to him. Some (Republicans) have no shame.
Tammy Duckworth, too.
Dan88 (Long Island, NY)
My money is on a unified con artist explanation: Trump will not let go of a dollar unless it is part of a scheme to get 5 in return. In this case, the pledge itself made him look good, thus supporting the long con. Actually paying was not necessary to the long con, at least until the press put a spotlight on it...
Babs (Richmond, VA)
Nixon was a piece of work, to be sure; however, he had political experience and was well educated. Was he also narcissistic? No doubt. Bigoted? You bet. But he had some essential restraint. Trump has none.

Like so many fellow readers, I have assumed that Trump is unelectable. But then, I had also sadly underestimated the bigotry and self-delusion of a frightening percentage of the populace.
MKKW (Baltimore)
Why bother to keep writing about Trump's peccadilloes. Every story that is about him and not about policy continues to inflate his value. Even when the media talk about his policy, it always comes down to this personal attack of him.

He is a completely forgettable figure except when he filters his nonsense through the media.

All this attention implies that he is important and has something important to offer.

Make him boring by talking about policy and not about him. Ignore the stones he throws and keep asking him to explain his stand.

Whenever he deflects by turning back the question to the media, go right back to the original question. Stop making the story about how difficult he is, about how his stories change, about his hypocrisy and about the media's hurt sensibilities. A large part of his voting block love all that E! Talk kind of gossip and they admire his balls in saying outrageous things.

His supporters love the game that Trump makes of the whole election process. Stop participating in the game and he will be left standing naked on the field.
Retired lawyer (US)
Watching this election cycle with a particular focus on the failings of broadcast media, I think that it is high time that we pass legislation requiring all candidates for national political office to undergo televised deposition under oath.

Anyone who would presume to lead us on a national level should be forced to answer relevant questions fully and honestly, without evasion, pivoting, or consequence-free lying.

If we ask this much of litigants and witnesses to legal process, it is the least we can ask of our prospective leaders.
A friend (Pennsylvania)
Trump should be asked to passed a psychiatric evaluation before being considered to be president. He is certifiably insane and the evaluation will guarantee that he should not be allowed to have the nuclear codes.
DCBarrister (Washington, DC)
If passing a psychiatric evaluation was requisite for being President, then Barack Obama would still be moving folding chairs around at a community center in Chicago.
TheraP (Midwest)
Not gonna happen. He'd sue the heck out of any honest professional.

Plus, imagine the tantrum!

You already have your answer. A lunatic is clear - to all sane folk!
DebbieR. (Brookline,MA)
Gail, it's time to broaden this story. This is not just about Donald Trump. It is a cautionary tale about what happens to people when everybody around them is fawning over them in an effort to benefit financially from their wealth.
Matt (NH)
Wow. This man just gets more despicable every day.

I stand ready to read the NYT analysis of the charities that Trump donated to and where that money came from. Sure, we already know that he wouldn't have donated a thing is the Washington Post hadn't been on the job. That's a start. Trump claimed he would raise and donate $6 million. We already know that he did not accomplish this. Apart from his personal check, I would like to know where the other money came from. I would also like to know more about the charities receiving the money, including: when they were formed, their track record of disbursing money to actual veterans and their families, the amount of money they spend on administration & fundraising vs. actual spending on the causes they represent, these groups' relationships with Trump, these groups' association, if any, with white supremacists, the criminal records, if any, of those running these groups. As Saint Ronald used to say: Trust, but verify.

And, finally, it's time for journalists to DO THEIR JOBS. Trump's behavior at the press conference was appalling, but it achieved his goals, but not ours. Keep hitting hard. Do not stop. If that means less access to Trump, so be it. There are others out there who will have that access and continue to report, and as they are declared persona non grata by Trump, others are ready to take their places. No more phone in interviews. Keep up the follow up questions. You get the idea.
Michael Gallagher (Cortland, NY)
If he was worth $10 billion, he wouldn't have to rise money -- he could just give it.
Vickie (San Francisco/Columbus)
Putting it in perspective, if Trump is worth 5 billion and if he donated a million, then he donated .0002 of his net worth. If we take him at his word :) that he is worth 10 billion, he donated .0001 of his net worth. In other words if you are worth a million that is equivalent to you donating either $100 or $200. Generous is not an adjective I would use to describe the Donald unless his unreleased tax records show differently.
John T (Ronkonkoma NY)
It's plainly obvious as to why Trump is so secretive about his finances:

He is not worth $10B.

I'm not even sure if he's worth $1B.

When you think about it, over the years, he has tried to slap his orange puffy face on bottled water, steak, board games, magazines etc. None of these ventures ever had a chance of making him really big bucks. To a person worth $10B, this would be the equivalent of a person who makes $100,000 a year setting up a lemonade stand. Sure, it WILL make you SOME money, but is it worth the trouble and would it really make any difference to your pocket? See, the answer is that Orange Drumph has tried to engage in these silly little ventures of his because he has NO money. Otherwise, why would he bother? It's really obvious if you think about it.
Ely Pevets (Nanoose Bay British Columbia)
If you go back to what I think were the inaugural episodes of 'The Apprentice' it revealed in full display Trump's cheapskate ways combined with his bald-faced greed and lack of empathy for anyone but himself.

A young obviously driven Jewish guy maybe in his 20s was absolutely determined that Trump should choose him. In the second episode he opted for a Hail Mary attempt to secure Trump's favor by showing $100,000 in cash in a briefcase that he was willing, if chosen, to give to Trump as a token of appreciation. After some negotiating (naturally) Trump snapped closed the briefcase, announced that they had agreed he could keep the money and kept it. Then he fired the kid. The kid walked out of there with nothing, totally destroyed, but he did get a ride in a Trump limo outside.

This little episode said everything one needs to know about Donald Trump, and I did not watch the show again.

That so many Republicans are throwing their support behind Donald Trump says more about them than it does about Trump. And that is saying something.

I also wonder whether that $100,000 cash was ever declared as income. That would be an interesting question for Trump to answer.
Tessa-M (Ca)
I pray that you the media keep hitting d-jerk-trumps Achilles heel. A person (you can not call him a man) such as him will bury himself with lies, and continue to show what an a$$ he truly is. With the lawsuits in place now and surly many more to come, how is going to have time "To make America great". Is it possible that this is his lawsuits dodge? I believe that if made president these cases are put on hold. As for his veterans donations...did he also donate the interest on the monies sitting in account since January? Let's bring in a forensic accountant to see just how the donald conducts business.
SteveAx (Westport, CT)
So Con Man Don, the racist, misogynist, fascist snake oil salesman apparently has alligator arms to go with his small hands. I give you American Exceptionalism!
John Quixote (NY NY)
In the Selling of the President 2016 we have a marketing strategy cooked up by apprentices who believe that standing with veterans is literal and that some of their heroism will transfer itself to Trumpty if he gives them a faux fundraiser . The media is the message and since many voters have stopped thinking for themselves (as have almost all members of congress) we are stuck with this charade. May all the king's horses and all the king's men be there for our children when we realize what has happened to the ideals for which our heroes fought.
Bill Needle (Lexington, KY)
One can read all the repetitive Trump analysis he wants. One can post all the repetitive Trump analysis he wants. One can "Tsk, Tsk, what a buffoon Trump is" all he wants. If a majority of my fellow citizens don't show up at the polls in November to vote against the fraud that is Trump - be it for Clinton or Sanders - our nation will have nobody to blame for the results but itself. Low voter turnout for Trump's opponent will cost our nation the glories of its past, its standing among other sovereign nations, and the promise of its future. This election cycle has made America appear to be a country vulnerable to the lowest, smarmy form of demagoguery. If we don't vote for whoever is running against Trump, may heaven help the United States of America. Register to vote - and then VOTE! It's all we common people can do to stop this jerk and save our nation.
John Scullin (Saint Paul, MN)
What's unfortunate is that it really doesn't matter to those who've pledged to vote for Trump what he does or doesn't do or says or doesn't say . Because it's not about who Trump is as much as who he isn't. Which is he's not Hillary Clinton. Obama Derangement Syndrome originated as Clinton Derangement Syndrome in the early 90s. This is nearly a quarter-century of illogical, ill-informed resentment and downright hatred coming to bear.

The anti-Hillary crowd would sooner vote for the mother of the kid who fell into the gorilla cage at the Cincinnati Zoo than vote for her. It's all terribly exasperating.
NY (NY)
As a mother who raised three children, I have sympathy for the woman whose three-year-old fell into the gorilla enclosure. What parent has not had a momentary lapse? Dropped a hand for a second, then grabbed it back in panic?

I have less sympathy for the zoo, which installed a barrier around an enclosure that a small child can slip through easily.
Dweb (Pittsburgh, PA)
If I was one of the other major donors to the Trump veterans' cause, like say Carl Ichan, BOY would I be asking some tough questions of the Donald right now.

"I gave you x bucks and from all evidence, it appears your "foundation" sat on the money for four months. And from all evidence, it appears that YOU never contributed to your own cause until the press began asking hard questions and might never have done so if they hadn't been persistent.

Next time you have some favorite cause and you want me to support it, don't bother calling. I can't trust you!"

Of course the other obvious question is whether any of those other donors ever asked Donald for a full accounting of what was raised and where it went. It appears not.
ANN (California)

I think the GOP establishment that has caved to this freak show have a plan.
This is what's going to happen, and you can take it to the bank: if, perish the thought, Doofus Donald is elected, Republicans will immediately get the Supreme Court justice they want...you know, the one that will guarantee women and minority rights are tossed right back to the Stone Age, also known as The Fifties....and then they'll impeach him. Which will be easy. Oh, you think he won't commit an impeachable offense in the first thirty days? Hahahaha! So anyway, you can bet they're going to be right in the middle of deciding who will be the VP, which is why Rubio and that fat slob from New Jersey are glued to Trumps side.
Brunella (Brooklyn)
It's horrifying that this detestable man is the presumptive GOP nominee.
Who votes for this level of candidate? He is the industrial waste by-product of a toxic Republican Party. Ignorance, arrogance and obnoxiousness are not admirable presidential qualities. He's a pompous snake-oil salesman and completely unworthy to hold elected office...of any sort. Those voting for him must surely despise our country and its people in the most barbaric way.

The last thing America needs is a bigoted, narcissistic Toddler-In-Chief.
CKent (Florida)
Trump is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman who knows there is no shortage of suckers in America. P. T. Barnum knew it too, but also knew better than to run for public office. When (and, one hopes, if) the voters figure out that the snake oil doesn't do anything, it'll all be over for Dr. Trumpo. Too bad we don't tar-and-feather charlatans and ride them out of town on a rail anymore. I'd even watch that on Fox News.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
Sometimes I wonder whether Rip Van Winkle has been reborn:

"I'm beginning to think it's true that Trump ... is now subconsciously (or perhaps even consciously) sabotaging his own campaign."

Trump's opponents in the primary said similar things. How'd that work out?

While journalist and commenters compete to come up with the funniest possible jokes about Trump, he's busy increasing his support among voters -- just as he did while his primary opponents (and journalists) were pre-occupied with making jokes about him.

New Jersey is a great example. It's about as blue a state as one can imagine. Obama won it 57-42 in 2008, and 58-41 in 2012. Hillary beat Obama 54-44 in the 2008 primary. Yet a recent poll showed Hillary beating Trump only 34-34, with an obviously large bloc still undecided or leaning toward a third-party candidate.

If Hillary is struggling even in New Jersey, how must she be polling in states like Ohio or Virginia or Colorado? Face reality: Hillary is likely to get beat by Trump.

Is the Democrats's goal to win in November, or simply to back Hillary whether she wins or loses?
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
Correction: The New Jersey poll shows Clinton ahead of Trump 38-34, not 34-34.
Cheekos (South Florida)
Donald Trump seems to act like a [psychopathic liar. He just spews comments out, whether they are factual, relevant to the situation (at hand) or even rational.

The Federal Judge, in the Trump University Case, is Mexican, but that does' t matter. So, why bring it up.

When called on the carpet for contributions that Veterans Groups never seemed to receive--from back in January--he attacked then reporter. But, he wan't looking for credit. So why did hen announce it in a very public Washington Mall Event?

He also suggested that anyone that anyone who didn't believe that the recent EgyptAir crash--soon after it happened-- was terrorism, is 100% wrong. Why does he even feel that he should have weighed-in?

https://thetruthoncommonsense.com
Dennis (New York)
Thanks for pointing out that Donald J. Trump recalled so vividly how he donated a million bucks to the veterans four months ago, yet conveniently never got around to cutting the check. The check was not in the mail.

When questioned about that lapse of memory, Trump, true to his volatile nature, went ballistic. Many well-to-do folks love making huge donations to a cause and then boldly announce it to the world. Then after the moment of glory has passed, and it is time to pay the piper, it seems to slip their minds. Oh yeah, that thing.

Getting a reminder from the press, a group which Donald relishes manipulating, irked His Highness. Donny is not one who loves to brag but he thought the press was there to praise Caesar, and instead they'd come to bury him. He was aghast and rightly so.

Trump is going to make America great, and this is what he gets? He tells us we will be so tired of winning we will demand the Donald stop with all the winning. I just hope all those disciples of Trump aren't disappointed when they need to remind, God forbid, "their president", about when all that greatness and winning is about to begin. Be aware, Trump Chumps, you now know The Donald is prone to forget promises he's made. Be very careful how you remind him. When you do so be sure you are at a safe distance. Perhaps in another country.

DD
Manhattan
Bill Chinitz (Cuddebackville NY)
When I clean my septic tank there's always stuff floating on top as well as copious amounts of sludge on the bottom. That, and the odor beat out any other metaphor, I've yet seen, for the Republican primary campaign.
Hrao (NY)
The voters who picked Trump as their choice are just as crass - one of them was seen shouting at a meeting at Ted Cruze - Lying Ted - are you Canadian? There are a lot of ugly people like Trump and the press covers them. Wow - what a Shakespearean tragedy -this election makes the world have contempt for the Republican party and the nut Bernie adds to the contempt for the Democratic party.
Jeff Rickin (Brooklyn NY)
Thank you Gail. I feel a bit better. Still hard to believe that I woke up after a year long sleep and found out that a dumb racist clown is the nominee of the Republicans.
Leslie374 (St. Paul, MN)
Your words reassure me that EVERYONE in this country has not lost their marbles. I don't care how wealthy or not wealthy Mr. Trump is. His behavior is that of a narcissistic buffoon. If he becomes President, many of the American people he is currently manipulating with his irresponsible and dishonest bravado will be economically destroyed. Why don't people see this? I do no want to be...I do not want my children or my neighbors to be minions of Donald Trump. I am grateful for the work and words of writers at the NYT, the Washington Post and The Guardian.
Dr Jay chicago (Chicago)
Gail Collins joins the ranks of Chris Mathews Keith overman Rachel Roger Simon Jim warren and a growing list of others who see and report on The Donald for what he is. The Donald's uneducated hopefully will see the light
Leslie (New York, NY)
Worst reality show ever! I just hope the audience gets sick of it in time because a Trump presidency would top this show by miles.
Marian (New York, NY)

Pecuniary differences:

Trump's impulse is to make money. Clinton's impulse is to take money.

Trump's charitable giving involves fanfare. Clinton's "charitable" taking requires stealth.

Trump's fav charitable contributions are free rounds of golf. Free tees at great courses to good causes sounds much more charitable than Bill's old boxers to the Salvation Army or Haitian gold mining rights to Hill's bro, Tony Rodham, via Clinton Foundation phony fix of earthquake-devastated Haiti.

Clinton 'mistakenly' misreports taxable income for speeches from Chinese & Islamic interests as tax-free donations. (POLITICO) Trump cleverly misreports nothing.

Trump emblazons his billions. Clinton hides hers.

HILLARY'S RUSSIA RESET BUTTON

She wired it backwards
Vladimir unnerved her
Didn't connect it to Russia
Attached it to her server.

She gave Putin our uranium
For Iran nukes, a stealth supply.
She got four hundred fifty million
Mushroom clouds fill our sky.
Dan Stackhouse (NYC)
Quite a lot of nonsense devoid of facts, exactly what I'd expect from a no-information Trump supporter. Look up Trump University sometime to see what a benevolent, honest person he isn't.
Tom (San Francisco)
Do you have to be ignorant or just plain dumb to support Trump? Seriously, he lies all the time. About everything. What's your excuse?

PS: Bill Clinton is not running for President.
Beidget (Crown Point)
Clinton outweighs Trump on every category here. End of story !
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
Columnists and Hillary supporters seem to be tripping over themselves in their efforts to come up with the funniest jokes they can think of about Trump.

Trump's opponents in the primaries did the same thing. So did the journalists who covered the primaries.

That turned out not to be so funny. Why is it considered funny now? Why are Democrats not focusing instead on what needs to be done to beat Trump, such as:

1. Acknowledge that Hillary can't beat Trump.

2. Stop insisting that voters back Hillary anyway, and that Bernie Sanders drop out immediately and "unify" behind a nearly-certain loser, Hillary Clinton.

If you think Hillary can beat Trump, consider the recent poll taken in New Jersey, about as blue a state as one can imagine. Obama beat McCain 57-42 in 2008, and he beat Romney 58-41 in 2012. Hillary beat Obama 54-44 in the 2008 primary. Yet a very recent poll showed Hillary ahead of Trump only 38-34 in New Jersey, with an obviously large bloc of voters either undecided or leaning toward some third-party candidate.

If Hillary's in danger even in New Jersey, can you imagine how she's polling in, say, Ohio or Virginia or Colorado? Still think she can win, and voters should just line up behind her?

Is the goal of Democrats to win in November, or is the goal to back Hillary, win or lose?
Tess (San Jose)
Your "three cents" worth of analysis appear as grounded in illusion as those of Trump supporters. National polls are pretty worthless in elections decided by an electoral college, and they certainly don't mean much at this point. And Hillary is the choice of the Democratic party because she has the most votes, by MILLIONS. Moreover, the current President and the Democratic machine haven't even started campaigning for her yet. Yet she's destined to lose, according to you, because of one NJ poll, 6 months before the election. Bernie supporters have much more in common with Trump's folks than they care to admit: delusion about how elections work, unwavering belief in a man who just loves the sound of his own voice but has no realistic policy plans & few accomplishments, and both men have demonstrated, through their divisive rhetoric, that not only are bipartisanship and compromise evil, but that their own personal ambition outweighs all other concerns, including the welfare of the country. Thanks, I'll take Hillary, the only proven leader amongst these nominees with a plan for the country and an ear for ideas other than her own.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
It wasn't a "national poll" I cited. It was a New Jersey poll. And I recognize that Hillary Clinton doesn't put a lot of stock in polls -- except, of course, when she's trying to figure out what her core beliefs are.

In any case, it's odd to have a Clinton supporter refer to anyone else as "delusional." I think they've retired the trophy on that one, and Clinton supporter have taken it home.
Robert Feiwell (Santa Rosa, CA)
There was another candidate who regularly referred to himself in the third person.. "Bob Dole"

I think it comes down to the evolving split that seems to happen to all candidates between the public Joe Candidate and the private Joe Citizen.

I suspect if Hillary ever settles on a more defined public persona, she might start doing it too!
Will (Dubai, UAE)
While Bob Dole never made it all the way (as, please God, neither will Trump), he too was a big fan of referring to himself as "Bob Dole" in the 3rd person. But be grateful for small blessings - at least Trump isn't (yet) referring to himself in the first person plural, in the style of a divine right monarch!
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
"He's all yours america....unless you cast a proper vote in November."

The choice being offered to us is Hillary or Trump. Many of us, long ago, decided that Hillary was a mediocrity who didn't deserve to be President. We're being told we should vote for her anyway, just because she's "not Trump."

I get the first part of "It's time for a woman to be President -- any woman." But the second part still puzzles me. Is Hillary Clinton really the person whom we want young girls to read about in the history books? She strikes me as a worn-out system hack well beyond her sell-by date – a woman who became First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State only because she was married to a President. Certainly there's someone better than her as a role model for our daughters.
NY (NY)
And who would that someone be?

The question before us will be Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. Not Hillary Clinton or some theoretical other candidate, female or not.
Vexray (Spartanburg SC)
“Oh, I’m totally accountable, but I didn’t want to have credit for it,” Trump said.

He is laying the groundwork for why his tax returns (if he ever releases them), to claim that he give lots and lots to many charities, but does NOT claim any deductions - because he is giving from his "heart" and does not want tax payers to subsidize him - except, of course, for depreciation and other rules for real(fake?) interest moguls which lets them shelter most of their taxes!
Victor Delclos (Baldwin, MD)
I have finally "gotten" Donald Trump. Do you remember "Borat?"
Cousin Al (Sydney Australia)
The Trump campaign is really a virtual reality show. The goal is to win the nomination. Demonize the opposition. Harrass the media. Trump uses the media like Isis. Big sensation events, outragous statements, anything to get attion.
I wonder how successful Donald would be if his stories appeared àt the bottom of page 2. Perhaps the media could have a Trump-free week to give voters a rest from the planned momentum of his media campaign.
He might have to pay for ads instead of getting the space free.
ernieh1 (Queens, NY)
Here's a delicious paradox.

After all his outlandish and outrageous policy proposals and malignant characterizations of people and groups who raise his ire, the things that may finally bring down Trump have to to with his money: how he makes his money (casinos, glitzy hotels, fake university, cheap steaks, ties made in China), and how he handles money (bankruptcies, sloppy handling of the vets' fund, refusal to release tax returns)...the very things he offers to us as his fitness for the office of president.

Trump's greatest fear appears to be people discovering that he really isn't that rich after all, and is a LOSER of gigantic proportions.
Donald Green (Reading, Ma)
A correction. Bernie Sanders did not get a deferment from the Viet Nam War. He applied for I-O status as a conscientious objector, and was denied. He remained I-A, and was not drafted. He did not use any outside influence to get out of military service. Therefore he is not in the same category as Messrs. Trump and Clinton.
Marcus Aurelius (Terra Incognita)
@Donald Green

All well and good, but ask yourself how in the world could a person claiming to be a conscientious objector become the commander in chief of the most powerful military in the world?

You might think that's not a problem, but believe me a lot of people under arms would...
Bob Burns (Oregon's Willamette Valley)
That this man is the banner carrier of the Republican Party absolutely mystifies me. How did it all wind up this way? One minute this goof ball is yammering about the President's birth certificate, and the next he's the Republican candidate? Oh...my...God! Conservatives have simply gone off the deep end with their pockets stuffed with lead sinkers.

Bob
Fibonacci (White Plains, NY)
The Trump conundrum is that he lies through his teeth but still gets a following that likes him and stays behind him, no matter how flawed. My theory is that Trump embodies the hopes of those least productive, unable to take responsibility for themselves. If you are not making it, I'll give you somebody you can assign blame to, so that you can feel good about yourself. It doesn't matter if you lack work ethic, don't try hard, etc...it's not your fault. Hitler blamed the Jews, Milosevic the Bosnians, and now Trump comes with Mexicans and others. Yeesh!
Chris T (New York)
Yes, I do want reporters to just "drop the subject." Until there is a yuuuge story that will absolutely wreck the Donald's candidacy, outlets like the New York Times are simply playing right into his hand by posting what for ordinary citizens would otherwise be controversy. But for Mr. Donald Trump's supporters, they only increase his free media airtime (estimated running value to-date: 2 billion USD). These minor character assaults only confirm what we already know about him: he's a sleaze, a liar, a cheat, a shady businessman, etc. People don't care about that news anymore! They support him nonetheless. Surely he must have done something more nefarious than con a few Chinese guys out of their little building.
coale johnson (5000 horseshoe meadow road)
needle this guy the right way and he will blow in an instant...... for this job i support hillary! keep up this tactic and i think any reasonable people that are wavering his way will be too afraid to vote for him.
David Warren (Phoenix)
Personally, I think we haven't seen anything yet. And that is saying a lot.

As this bloated, spoiled-rotten, baby-man gets closer to the brass ring of the Presidency his flappy-armed, small-finger-pointing tantrums will likely become more frequent and hilarious.

But just wait until he is truly in a downward spiral, which is bound to happen, with all the polls confirming what the stuck 12 year old little boy in this over-sized, aging, combed over body can't stand to know - nobody likes him. Then...sit back and watch...
Calibrese (Canada)
Surely by now the holy grail of the hacker universe must have to be "how to get a copy of the Donald's tax returns". C'mon WikiLeaks ...work your sources!
Steve (Los Angeles)
I think on election eve we'll find Donald Trump in the Cayman Islands beyond the reach of American law enforcement sitting on a big pile of Republican National Committee money.
Paul (Bellerose Terrace)
In a famed feud, the novelist Mary McCarthy used a withering dismissal of the playwright Lillian Hellman that seems perfectly appropriate to apply to Trumplestiltskin:
"Every word is a lie, including 'and' and 'the.'"
Col Andes Dufranez USA Ret (Ocala)
As a decorated Vietnam veteran father of a highly decorated including a Silver Star with V device and Purple Heart son who fought in Iraq we both state unequivocally that Drumph has to stop using our veterans as props. We do not agree with his thoughts on torture or war fighting and if still serving would not obey his illegal orders. No Drumph we are not electing a king we are in fact electing a Commander in Chief and will sorely miss our current President who does not put our troops in harms way because somebody got under his thin skin or because they proved he had a little mind with his tiny hands. Drumph you Sir and I use the term generously are not qualified. Take your lucky sperm, bigoted, clown act home and release the tax returns so we can prove what a fraud you are once more on your way out the door. Airborne Obamanos!
Vanessa Hall (Millersburg MO)
"Unless he’s not a billionaire at all."

Bingo!

Donald Trump is one huge walking, talking Ponzi scheme, juggling deals that create all kinds of cash flow, but that cash flow does not necessarily result in a positive bottom line. If just one of those balls get dropped the entire empire comes crashing down around him.

Unrelenting demands for tax returns are in order.
jefflz (san francisco)
Donald Trump has bragged in an interview with Howard Stern that his personal Vietnam was facing venereal disease during his very active period of sexploitation. That is his idea of courage.

Trump has made hundreds of statements that should disqualify any candidate for the presidency. When are millions of people going to realize he offers no real hope of improvement to their lives, and only seeks to feed his need for personal glory and enhance his bottom line. When are they going to realize we need a leader and not a fast talking salesman to run our government.

The joke is over Trump is no longer just a stand-up comic. We see that he cannot control his own behavior. An uncontrollable Donald Trump in the White House would be a threat to the economy and world peace.
V (Los Angeles)
Somebody please wake me up from this Trump nightmare.

I am having a terrible dream, right???
Marissa A (Austin, TX)
If Trump becomes President, I'm attributing it as the collective failure of America's decaying public education system. If this country is not populated with intellectual, thoughtful people who possess basic critical thinking skills then our democracy is in serious trouble. We live in the age of the Internet and Google... any ignorance at this point is willful. There is no excuse for not knowing the facts.
Cowboy Marine (Colorado Trails)
In most parts (some cities and college towns excepted) of the red states it is not politically correct to teach critical thinking. Teachers who try are shunned, sometimes bullied, and leave for bluer pastures. Sports/jocks and teaching fundamentalist Christian America right or wrong are the purposes of schools in most red state communities.
Richard (<br/>)
At the risk of being called a conspiracy theorist, I will only point out that Republicans have been happily slashing budgets for K-12 schools and state universities everywhere you look for some time now. Coincidence?
Entera (Santa Barbara, CA)
I lay this entire, obscene spectacle on the doorstep of our media obsessed electorate, and the manipulative spewing of lies, hatred, and fantasy projections provided for many years now by the profit generating, right wing media. From Fox to Rush, etc., Americans have been tuning in to this brain washing because it's highly entertaining, not realizing that it's also highly corrosive to one's ability to think logically.

It's not funny anymore, and the tragedy is that it's still highly entertaining when viewed through the prism of media.
Chris Hutcheson (Dunwoody, GA)
I didn't think it was possible for any one person to be more phony than the republican ticket of Flim and Flam during the last presidential race. Trump has proved me wrong.
Coco (NY)
They now look like principled statesman of depth.
Timothy Gill (New York)
Trump's entire electoral calculus boils down to one thing — and it's completely of a piece with the recent revelations about Trump University and prop veterans — Trump is betting that he'll capture the stupid vote. And sadly it seems that that's a constituency increasing in numbers by leaps and bounds. I recently spent some time in a Deep South state where the AM radio airwaves are completely dominated by lying grifters like Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and others who, besides spewing their hate filled, fictional and derisive commentary, shill products like Patriot Greens (some herbal drink concocted by a "veteran" to rebuild damaged bodies), gold investment schemes which will actually deliver the gold to your home so, presumably, you can use it to barter for food when the apocalypse comes, and $189 seed kits and "gourmet" meals that will last for 25 years... yum, yum. The people who listen to these malevolent fakers and buy their stuff are Trump's stupid voters, along withe the motorcycle gangs with the black POW/MIA flags flapping at the back. It remains to be seen whether there are enough of them who can actually find their way to the polls on Election Day to install a Stupid Regime under President Donald Trump. It has happened before, you know, in otherwise civilized countries, and as a result my father found himself piloting a landing craft onto the beaches of North Africa and Italy in 1942.
Darin S (NYC)
Every thing with Trump is an exaggeration. Add some zeros to his wealth, claim greater business successes than what actually took place. This issue is no different. My guess is he raised only a fraction of what he initially claimed and had to scramble to make up the difference when he was called to provide proof the donations were made.
Susan Anderson (Boston)
The dumpster fire of vanity will make America bankrupt. His best act: taking your money.
Sharon5101 (Rockaway Beach Ny)
Here we are in the second decade of the 21st century and, once again, we find the mid- 20th century war in Viet Nam is engulfing and devouring another presidential election cycle. Of course we're very selective in praising future Democrats like Bill Clinton and Bernie Sanders for avoiding military service because they were too busy pursuing noble endeavors to be bothered serving in South East Asia. Yet future Republicans like Donald Trump are treated with disdain and called "draft dodgers" because they also found loopholes which helped prevent them from going to Viet Nam. Everyone thinks that even relatively minor ailments like bone spurs is hysterically funny when some rich guy has this problem. Isn't it time to move past this hypocritical us vs them mentality of who served and who didn't serve in Viet Nam?

America is never going to move forward as long as the ugly specter of Viet Nam comes back to life during future presidential campaigns regular as clockwork.
NYC (NY)
You're missing the point.

It's not that most of us are especially judgmental of those who dodged the Vietnam draft.

It's that we are judgmental of Vietnam draft-dodgers who later morph into drum-beating hawks.
BigI45 (USA)
The difference is the Democrats were against the Viet Nam War on moral grounds as they resisted the draft; the Republicans were enthusiastic supporters of the war and the troops, yet they disdained to join them or "fight for the freedom" which was their justification for the carnage. The Republicans also viciously derided those who were "too scared" to fight, were "pinko lovers," etc. One group believed the war was immoral; the other that it was crucial to protect our freedom...yet the latter found ways to use their privileged position to not take part in the noble fight. There's the hypocrisy.
Carolyn M. (Kensington, MD)
Using veterans as props for his campaign, Trump has once again stooped below his already shameful ignorance of everything decent and worthy. What group will he not callously insult or use for his own "advancement"? The irony is -- every man or woman who has served this country has more intelligence in their little finger than Donald Trump. And that goes for the American voters. He will not be our president. We cannot let this happen.
granny P (94301)
Speaking of Nixon, what do you suppose this imperious conquerer
would have the guardians of the white house wear? Something like
Britain's Palace Guard?

It's not surprising he thinks he can make the press submit (they did
while first in shock) like "good subjects." It seems they are beginning to
wake up, luckily for all of us.
Leo Pelliccia (Canada)
A world gone absolutely mad - you just can't please anyone anymore. Sad, very sad.
Robert (Out West)
Yeah, it's just terrible--reporters out there asking the questions they oughta ask, some people feeling disgusted with loudmouths who think their feelings are more important than helping vets, the rest of us laughing at a guy who behaves like mommy wouldn't give him a cookie.
Dadof2 (New Jersey)
I thought that after Warren G. Harding that America had learned not to elect a dolt as President. Dreadful as Richard Nixon was, he was not a dolt. He was a bit crazy, but, so was LBJ and Woodrow Wilson.

But I was wrong. In 1980, we elected a far, FAR worse President. He was shrewd, but he was an ignorant dolt. If that wasn't bad enough, we "elected" his successor's son, who was a TOTAL dolt.

But never, in our history, have we collected SO many wrongs in one man: Dishonest Don.
He's a total dolt. His knowledge of history is nonsense, as is his knowledge of international affairs, economics, finance, law, civil liberties, the Constitution.
He is clearly mentally unbalanced and delusional, with equal parts of paranoia, schizophrenic delusions, cognitive dissonance, narcissism, and psychopathy.
No President EVER has had neither government nor military experience--and Dishonest Don has neither.

He is, as Howard Dean says, wacko. As are the people who support him.
nyer (NY)
This from the conservative humorist PJ O'Rourke, describing why even he would have to vote for Hillary Clinton over Trump:

"While Hillary Clinton is wrong about absolutely everything, at least she is wrong within normal parameters."
Elise (Northern California)
Thank you Gail Collins for another funny column that hits the nail right on his orange head.

Next thing you know, I expect him to give $15 each to the soon-to-be Donald Trump Foundation For Women's Health care, the Trump Foundation to Fight Cancer, the Trump Foundation for Working People, and the Trump Foundation For Better Hair, all the while claiming he has positively, absolutely always been for women's health care, against cancer, for working folks and against bad hair days. That they are targeted voters in the presidential race is, 'natch, mere coincidence.

Obviously, as is the case with the phony million "he" gave to veterans, all the Trump Foundation money will be raised, paid and donated by anyone >except< Trump, who will then claim all the credit as if he can buy his own stairway to heaven, thankyouverymuch.

God help us all.
foresite (UT)
Why must the Press only spin the negative, one-sided view of a charitable donation completed with an intended lack of bravado? Analyzing a Good Samaritan story and only finding bad news is America's Big Problem. No wonder today's young adults are so cynical! Even-handed reporting is a lost art!
Martin (NYC)
Because he constantly praised himself for a donation he actually hadn't made, while saying he didn't want credit? In other words claiming to be a good Samaritan without being one? That's why people are cynical.
RockoWorld (SW CT)
What was most shocking and just continues to amaze me, was some of the comments from the crowd attending the veteran/biker rally. "Trump is like us, he tells it like it is." It is just incomprehensible how these people can think those 2 things.
Alex (London)
When will Trump realise that with public service comes accountability or does he believe he can run the US like North Korea.
billinbaltimore (baltimore,md)
Gail, one of your best. Thanks for bringing a little levity to this horrible situation.
Mary Hughes (NJ)
Makes me wonder what happened to all the loot they collected on his reality show "for charity"? Did any of those organizations ever receive it???
Larry Weiss (Denver)
One most interesting part of this chapter is watching the Republican Party partially rally around this buffoon. They are suddenly discovering admirable leadership qualities in a man the party leaders loathed and reviled for lo these many months.

Some Republican leaders have shown integrity by refusing to endorse him. The Bushes, for example, and Mitt Romney. I'm a Democrat and I can't say I agree with their policies but I know a profile in courage when I see one. They have raised themselves in my estimation by valuing country and world above party.
RR3 (Cambridge, MA)
Gail Collins should be declared a national monument. My only regret is being unable to worship there but twice a week or so. I'm fortunate to work at home, otherwise my screeches of delight, in an office setting, possibly would be grounds for a harassment complaint.
Yogini (California)
We live near a large military base. Some local former Marines have a group that is protesting Donald Trump's made up contributions to Veterans causes. They are smart and know when they are being used. Seriously, does Donald Trump want to dissuade reliable Republican votes from the military veterans? Maybe he thinks they won't notice but they have made protest signs and visited his campaign events. Yet, another group he has alienated.
GLC (USA)
Are those local marines supporting the former draft dodger (Sanders) or the former anti-war activist (Mx. Clinton)? Shoot, are they even marines, or just slackers looking for exposure on social media.
M Lentz (Bloomsburg, PA)
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men (people) to do nothing. Complacency and indifference are not options for those of us who care dearly about the future.
Doug Broome (Vancouver)
God save us all should this contemptible man get his hands on the nuclear launch codes.
He runs on about his support for the military and veterans when the likelihood is that he doesn't pay a penny in income taxes, a perfect parasite, a nasty little egoist to the point of psychopathology.
jd (Canada)
If Trump actually is as rich as he says he is, he should begin outlining how he would structure an arms-length relationship with that money in a blind trust should he be elected. Otherwise every decision he would make would be in a potential conflict of interest. I am sure he does not care, but there are rules about such things.
TheraP (Midwest)
Wherther he wins or not somebody should construct a large, soundproof room with no windows, no TV and no phone, so no Twitter. He needs to be isolated from all doings. For the good of the nation.
Diego (Los Angeles)
can we please just hold the election now and get it over with?
It's gonna be Trump V. Clinton.
anyone voting for trump is not going to be dissuaded, and anyone not voting for him isn't about to switch. or, at most, maybe 1% of the voting public is persuadable one way or the other.
Think how much happier the country would be if we could spend the summer doing anything other than listening to more of the depressing nonsense that passes for political campaigns in 2016.
NYC (NY)
No. The Bernie people need time for the grieving process, then time to get scared enough to show up for the general.
Joyce (Toronto)
Trump is what the Republican Congress, ergo the Republican Party, got for its never ending battle to thwart anything that Obama tried to enact for the betterment of American people. The chickens have come home to roost. The Republican Party got what it deserved - shallow, hateful, lying Donald Trump.

Thank you again Gail for another brilliant, insightful, substantial and very witty column.
Connie (NY)
Wow! I'm reading the letters. You all are rabid Trump haters. Interesting since you are about to nominate Hillary who could be indicted at any moment. Hillary who turned a $1000 stock investment into $100000. Hillary who has taken money from just about everyone. Oh yes, Trump is just terrible for only giving one million dollars to vets.
Yogini (California)
I did not realize Hilary was a savvy investor. Since when is turning a small amount of money into a large amount a bad thing. Warren Buffet turned a small investment into a fortune too. It seems that is what is called the American dream now.
Robert (Out West)
Nah. We just think that if he's gonna behave like a whiny five-year old girl, there should be Federal legislation passed requiring him to dress like Shirley Temple or Junior the Mean Widdle Kid every time he gives a press conference.

For speeches, though, it should be, lessee, Mussolini all the way. Though I have to admit, the way he does dress is hilarious enough all on its own.
Doug Broome (Vancouver)
Betcha any donation will have been given after June 2.
JOELEEH (nyc)
Forget everything else (as if you could), and just try to justify having a person this sensitive to criticism (or merely a standard journalistic question, perceived as criticism), this thin-skinned, this defensive, this easily driven into absurd statements ("I wanted to do it quietly without coverage"), as demonstrated at his "press conference", step into the role of POTUS. Such a cool customer under pressure. He can really take the heat.
Dtwilson (Aptos, Ca)
I would love to see a story of ex trump supporters. What finally made them decide they'd had enough. At what point does a recent republican say enough is enough? I know my 85 year old mother (GOP lifer, small biz owner and Stanford grad) is going to vote for Secretary Clinton. Maybe if enough of those voices are heard, it will help encourage others away from their fact-free support of the talking yam.
Kristine (Illinois)
I agree. Just heard my life-long Republican relative tell me she is not voting for Trump. I almost fell out of my chair. Other than the fact that she said he was disgusting, I have no idea why and did not want to ask for fear of getting into a heated debate with someone I truly love.
Olivia (NY)
I would be afraid talk about politics with any of the Republicans in my extended family at this point. What if I discover that they are in fact supporting Trump?

That would be kind of like the scene in "invasion of the bodysnatchers" in which the last humans in the town discover that their friends have morphed into pod people.
greatj (Brooklyn N.Y.)
Trump has raised over five million dollars for veterans while Clinton and Sanders have raised nothing.
Robert (Out West)
This is of course absolute nonsense.

Now, tell the one about how Obama visited HIroshima and apologized, and didn't go to Arlington this last weeked. i love that one.
GLC (USA)
Robert, absolute nonsense is making sexist references to Shirley Temple.
mark korte (montana #34;formerly Missouri#34;)
he did not apologize - that has been discussed and documented. on the other hand - the japanese did apologize some time ago.
Mike (Santa Clara, CA)
Trumps motto should be "Ignore what I do, just listen to the latest thing that I say" or perhaps "Words speak louder then actions."

Time after time Trump is exposed as a phony, and yet his supporters just don't seem to care. I'm baffled.
rad6016 (Indian Wells)
A SE native american tribe reportedly gave Trump the honorary name of Okeefenoloco which means "He who has hair like a Crowned Egret and a tongue that avoids the truth". I believe he gave them a lifetime supply of Trump keychains in return.
ROB (NYC)
Like the buildings with his name on them, that he doesn't own, but merely licenses his name, Trump is mostly facade. "Make America great again"? Please, it's more like "Never give a sucker an even break".
libtarf (libville)
Don the Con is rotten to the core. I hope he ends up in prison instead of the white house. Snake oil grifter, spewer of hate, flim flam man, step right up all you rubes. Hillary is perfect next to this no talent clown.
JWL (Vail, Co)
Well Ms. Collins, I think it would be a public service if the media stopped covering Trump. Trump is, after all, a media creation, and in this case, it would not be a crime if you were to eliminate your young.
An egomaniacal fool like Trump would normally be thrilled to show his riches. Many believe he is not releasing his tax returns because he gives nothing to charity, let alone to our veterans, and that leaves a giant hole in his narrative. When the voters realize this man is not able to string two truths together, they just may reject the man Kim Jong-un has endorsed for our president.
George A (Pelham, NY)
I think Trump, like Bruce Banner, channels The Hulk when he gets angry. He goes into these monosyllabic rants where, as you point out, he refers to himself in the third person.
sandyg (austin, texas)
Gail, Gail, Gail! Many of us know what an absolutely unmitigated charlatan Trump is, dangerously unfit to hold ANY public office. So, why not use your considerable powers of persuasion to convince some of those fools who have already vowed to vote for him in November to grow-up and retract their pledges BEFORE they elect him to the oval office. I would do it myself, but my megaphone is too small. Use yours before the NYT succeeds in its dive to the bottom.
Peter Turner (Australia)
The ones that lied about this are the press and the media. If you believe the woman who is wrote this article you are seriously short on understanding and common sense. Trump raised and donated millions to the Vets. Anything else is just lies. End of story. The world knows it and saying different just proves that the media really is a bad as Trump says it is. Horrible people really.
NYC (NY)
"Anything else is just lies."

No, anything else is just details. Highly relevant details.
MD (.)
Pity the city of Cleveland, to be remembered as the place where Trump was officially named Republican nominee.
TheraP (Midwest)
Cleveland has done a lot to become a great city. Don't blame trump on Cleveland!
Political Hostage (USA)
Bit of a stretch, Gail. I'd say your opinion is comical at best.
Wayne Dalcin (Houston)
Another left winged hit piece by a LEFT WING RAG.
You complain when he RAISES AND DONATES $5.6 million!!!!

Like maybe he should not VET the recipients ? ARE U INSANE?

Personally, I really DONT CARE when the money was paid, but THAT IT WAS PAID.

BTW, how much money that your criminal candidate swindled from the u s. Taxpayers did she ever donate to VETERANS?

She would rather ignore their calls , see them die while she lines her pockets with ill begotten cash.

get real!! TRUMP DOESNT NEED THIS JOB. Or the relentless left wing lynch mob.
Yogini (California)
Trump needs a day job. That is why he is running for President.
Robert (Out West)
Clearly you've escaped us pack of limp-wristed English teachers so far, so I don't see what you're wailing about.

By the way, you figure Trump's gonna pick you up in the limo, fly you to Dubai for the party, any time soon? really?
Carol lee (Minnesota)
The POINT is that he had no intention of paying the money until the Washington Post called him on it.
Dan Cofran (Kansas City)
Bob Dole wouldn't say that about Bob Dole.
CFM (Columbia, SC)
If you are driving the family car and it's making a terrible noise, has lost power, is getting worse and worse gas mileage, the best solution is NOT to drive it off a cliff.

To elect Donald Trump this November would be akin to driving the car (including all its passengers) off the cliff.
DJ McConnell ((Fabulous) Las Vegas)
We should start referring to Trump supporters as Seekers, as in There's a Seeker Born Every Minute.
James Lee (Arlington, Texas)
Gail, I see no reason why you should besmirch the good name of Scrooge McDuck by comparing him to Trump. I am sure there must be a provision in the libel laws that would applies. Expect to hear from Mr. McDuck's lawyers.
MsPea (Seattle)
Hasn't Trump had his 15 minutes already? I don't know about anyone else, but I'm sure losing interest in him. He's lost his appeal and is no longer a novelty. Now he's just an annoyance. All that yammering on TV gets on my nerves. Maybe that's why his crowds have thinned out. We're all starting to have Trump Overload. It's time to move on to other things. After all, our collective attention span has been stretched to its very limit with this presidential campaign. Time to switch channels and see what the Kardashians have been up to all this time.
PubliusMaximus (Piscataway, NJ)
Way back in 1957 there was a movie called "A Face In The Crowd" in which Andy Griffith plays low life huckster who gets exposed by the very media he used to gain fame and fortune. In it his character says something like " I toss 'em a few dead fish and they all wave their flippers and bark" or something very close to that. Maybe that's why this real estate mogul's story sounds so familiar to me.
Tim (Salem, MA)
I think I have figured out the Trump phenomenon:
First, it is a grassroots movement.
Second, as writer Irma Bombeck told us long ago, the grass always grows greener over the septic tank.
I leave you to connect the dots.
Mike Baker (Montreal)
Forget the birthers. We're the receipters.

As in, show us the receipt Donald!

He'll prolly say the dog ate it, on a family car excursion up to Canada.

"Dang," says the orange haired one. "You leave a million buck donation receipt on the roof of your car, and the next thing you know, the dog ..."

One notch above the space aliens excuse. But there you have it.

Receipters! Rise up for the truth!!
Mytwocents (New York)
When is the NYT going to report and analyze the new news? That Brian Pagliano Hillary's It guy refused to testify although he was granted immunity. Was he afraid to show up Vince Fostered in a park?

This is the same Brian Pagliano who was Information Technology (IT) Director at NGP-VAN, the DNC's voter list data management company that dropped the firewall and exposed voter data to all the campaigns. The company's founder, Nathaniel G. Perlman is also an avid Clinton supporter from '08.

Funny how nobody sees how all the strings lead to one puppet master...and worry so needlessly about Dove Trump.
NYC (NY)
For even the most audio logically driven commenter, there is typically a pretense of relating one's post to the article at hand before the pivot. This post is all pivot.

Next time, why not just share your favorite recipe in response to an article on, say, climate change?
richard tunney (ftl,fl)

My east texass granddaddy had a fav comment about folks who were loud mouths and "no flames beyond the fire",or wore cowboy boots and no cattle.
He sed,"that man hasn't got a pot to wet in nor a window to throun it outta".Sorta like cuzzin DJ T. Throun was his own invention for "throw"
sophia (bangor, maine)
Hillary needs to hire a team. A team of comedy writers. Jon Stewart. Colbert. Gail Collins. And this team needs to, every day, relentlessly, make fun of Il Donald. Everything he says and does should be mocked by these people who have the skill to turn everything back on him. And let's see how long he lasts without blowing up. He needs to be pushed over the edge BEFORE the election so that he never, ever makes it to the Oval Office.

America cannot afford this orange-haired clown. I ask the comedic geniuses of this country to do their patriotic duty - and take this man-baby down.

I think Nancy Pelosi is right. He wants to be saved from the presidency. He doesn't really want the job after he wins. He just wants to win and then hand the reins over to Grover Norquist who only wants a Republican with digits to sign whatever (gutting Social Security for example) is put before him.

He can't stand to be laughed at and disregarded. That's what we need now. Everyone needs to just mock everything he does and says.
TheraP (Midwest)
Actually, I think the Times commenters make a great team! Plus, we're free!

I am certain Hilary's folks gather zingers here by the day, even by the hour.

I'm not really certain. But I believe so. I hope so! They'd be stupid if they didn't. And they are not stupid.
Bill Levine (Evanston, IL)
Gail, we're definitely tired of Donald Trump, but not of stories that dig where he would rather you didn't. The vast wealth thing, for example. That could be interesting regardless of what turned up:

- If his financial interests are as wide-ranging as he says, that makes him a giant walking conflict-of-interest. It is truly bizarre that his campaign staff thinks this will be easy to handle, as if putting "everything" in a blind trust would give him amnesia as to where his holdings are. Of course, you can't get terribly far with that without the tax returns, but...
- If on the other hand he is not rolling in it after all, it could be just a bit embarrassing.

Regardless, I would make a strong suggestion that the Times and other news organizations drop the "mogul" appellation until there is some evidence behind it. There is only one thing we know about Trump without any doubt - he is a television personality, and a wildly successful one at that. Doesn't have the same ring as "billionaire" or "real-estate mogul", but we know it's true - and it just might be the source of most of his income after all.
tom hayden (MN)
my bumper sticker says:
"Donald Duck for president"
maybe should read "Scrooge McDuck..."
Burton (Illinois)
Trump is Wovoka
Glen (Texas)
Gail, Trump is a mash-up of at least three cartoon characters. Take one part Foghorn Leghorn, one part Daffy Duck, and one part Tasmanian Daredevil. Throw in a pinch of Wile E. Coyote. Blend. Bake half way done. Serve.
East Ender (Sag Harbor)
The problem for me is greater than Trump. It is the underbelly of racism and faux nationalism that he continues to incite to Make America Great Again. To make matters worse, the GOP establishment now supports him, which says so much about them. Sheep. Cowering behind an aggressive coward who they are betting will beat Hillary Clinton. For them, nothing is worse than to have the party lose, not even losing the "country" or our standing in the world.

When Trump, involved a legal case, publicly derides the judge involved and identifies him as Mexican (when he was born here and has a known, stellar record for justice and doing the right thing) he is baiting the anger and racism of his "fans." It's not long, I fear before this baiting devolves into clash and violence. And of course, it will never be Donald's fault.

When have we heard a candidate refer to his supporters as "fans?" His goal, more than to Make America Great Again with an agenda of policy that makes sense is to have admirers. Don't his "fans" see this?
DaDa (Chicago)
The NY Times keeps covering Trump with the same sort of balance and reserve they use for normal candidates, who often have a 'different point of view'. But when it comes to Trump, who tells out and out lies, why don't they note that the 3rd party verifiable facts contradict him. (E.g. Hillary wants to send ALL the jobs in America overseas.)
sheila white (idaho)
You forgot to mention John Kerry, a politician who served and was awarded
honors.
SJ (Albany, NY)
Please GOPers, please put an end to this forever long national nightmare!

I just woke up damp with fright-sweat from a bad dream in which I walked out of my apartment in a builing with "Trump" emblazened across the portal, robed in Trump garments (including a Trump tie), sipping Trump water, walked across an airport stall with numerous books with Trump migshots, boarded a Trump Air plane to a place - destination is kind of fuzzy - where there was a Trump golf course. After that I received a diploma from Trump U and became an apprentice. Egad! It was dream but I think I need therapy.

Please, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Graham, even Mr. Cheney! Anyone? Dang.
tiredofpc (Arizona)
This is one Veteran who won't be voting for Trump. In fact, if he was on fire at my feet & someone gave me a glass of water? I'd drink it.
Susan H (SC)
Best response ever!
ck (Santa Fe, NM)
Mark my words: Paul Ryan will be the GOP nominee yet. He wants nothing more than come charging in on the white horse to save the day (humbly, of course!). He's just biding his time.
CG (RI)
I would love to see a "Chumps for Trump" bumper sticker. I am afraid that the human brain has a flaw that will be it's downfall in the end. Way too easily manipulated and brainwashed. How else can we explain what is going on now and what has occurred in the past ... Germany for example. Fox (not) news anticipated two years ago that Hillary would run for the presidency and began their Bengazi drumbeat....over and over until we now have a hatred of Hillary that cannot be explained other than thought manipulation. Ask someone who is professing this intense hatred a few follow up questions and it becomes clear that they have nothing to say. They don't really know why they hate her, they just do. Trump is a master manipulator of those whose analytical thinking skills are non existent. Combine this with inherent racism and you have a disaster in the making. Please let common sense win out.
Steven (Marfa, TX)
Since -- Vladimir Putin's and Xi Jiping's wildest dreams come true! -- Trump is going to be our next President, and will do a marvelous job of completing the destruction of the US that the GOP has been busily engaged with for thirty years, we should get used to not making fun of him, and believing everything he says.

He needs our troops and bikers, not to go to war with foreign countries -- he'll just initiate trade wars to serve that purpose -- but to pacify the local population.

The US will be one, giant Plutocrat Theme Park, with Trump in charge, and us, his deluded supporters, as the world's laughingstock -- I mean livestock -- or, rather, zoo exhibits -- roaming the Park behind electric fences, for their entertainment.

The troops and bikers will be there to shoot us down if we resist this glorious future planned for us.
hen3ry (New York)
"There is a sucker born every minute." The United States was not born the minute in between. In other words just because Trump is saying the things that appeal to us doesn't mean he's going to do right by us. And we shouldn't buy into his rhetoric as proof that he understands us or gets it. The GOP has not understood or cared about what 95% of us need to live decent lives and we vote for them. Let's not make the same mistake and vote for Trump even if he's a recent Republican. We need a president with intelligence, experience in foreign and domestic affairs, flexibility, gumption, and nerves of steel. Trump is none of those and hasn't got the requisite experience or temperament to be a servant of the people.
charlspa (mukilteo)
You say Trump should show his tax returns to verify he is a billionaire. Since when do tax returns show net worth? They show taxable income and related deductions and credits. Trump's net worth would only be known by looking at a list of his real estate and various companies and businesses he owns and determining what each is worth. You obviously want to make readers think you have a reason to see his tax returns that has no relationship to his net worth. Or you do not understand what you are writing.
RockoWorld (SW CT)
Dude, really? This is an opinion piece, not a news article. I understand there is no difference at say Fox News, but at real news outlets, there is a difference.
charlspa (mukilteo)
I guess if you want to call black, white, and want thousands of readers to agree, it shows deception on the writer's part, not a difference of opinion. Not sure how you define "real news outlets" but with the regular showing of Times articles to be incorrect with respect to Trump, such as the article about how he treats women that was immediately refuted by the specific women in the article, you should reevaluate what "real news" means. Maybe the expose rags are more in line with your definition that can say anything and people are supposed to believe it. Net worth vs. taxable income are well defined and not opinion differences--Accounting 101.
Marcus Aurelius (Terra Incognita)
"You obviously want to make readers think you have a reason to see his tax returns that has no relationship to his net worth. Or you do not understand what you are writing."

His intent is to deceive and his lack of understanding is just frosting on the cake of deception...
JfP (NYC)
That was a truly sickening display.

The man is mentally ill.

His remarks about McCain are an accurate
indicator of his feelings about Vets.

His "numbers went up" so this justifies his grotesque comments.

If his numbers didn't go up through phony pandering to Vets, he
would not bother.

When are the people of this country going to wake up to the hypocracy
of this disgraceful candidate?

I am embarrassed to call myself Republican.
V P (Boston)
Is there really a need to lavish more attention on Trump? The media seems unable to recognize the fact that he could care less what you say about him, he just wants the exposure.
Mel Farrell (New York)
Maureen, you are the absolute best.

I'm so trumped out, steeped in, afraid it'll rise past my lips and drown me in its nastiness.

Talking about draft dodging, which is exactly what these morons did, at least Hillary didn't, not because she wouldn't if women's draft had existed, but we do know she would have us believe she is tough as nails, since she ducked and weaved, as she and her landing party, including Chelsea, ran hell for leather from imaginary sniper bullets, across the tarmac, but had the decency to stop, under at least 30 caliber rifle fire, to present flowers to schoolchildren, standing stoically on the tarmac, curiously neither ducking, weavimg, or running.

It's ok though" she "misspoke", blessings be upon her.

See link, (CBS Video)

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;url=http://...
Andy (Chicago)
Trump is a unattractive simpleton / charlatan / carnival midway barker.

Were he to darken my door I'd shoo him away like I do to a common house fly.
Terry McKenna (Dover, N.J.)
This simple and clear account is as good as any of the news reports. Yes, Trump makes things up and even while he does, he changes his answers anyway.
memosyne (Maine)
Trump has no experience in government or in foreign policy.
Remember GW Bush and Dick Cheney sending two recent graduates of a Christian college to Baghdad in April 2003?
Their mission? Set up a stock exchange!!!
Know nothings do not belong in government.
I'd rather have Jackie Gleason as POTUS than Tump!!
S.P. Riley (Chelsea, Quebec)
We could probably find you a great job, Gail, if you'll move to Canada. This Trump thing is not going to end well.
RMC (Farmington Hills, MI)
Shameless self-aggrandizing draft-dodging unqualified buffoon are the words that come to mind to a veteran of three wars (Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan).
Paul (Long island)
Yes, he really is Scrooge McTrump who wants our allies to pay for our bases and troops defending them, who claims he'll build a wall and Mexico will pay, and whose proposal to handling our national debt is to renegotiate it with those other nations who hold our debt or threaten default. It's OPM, as in "Other People's Money," that is his mantra and the source of his wealth as he boasted in his Trump University brochure. And you can "bet your bottom dollar" that Trump's contributions to the veterans are mainly free rounds of golf that he's gleefully deducted from his income taxes leaving him paying zero. So, the best advise to all is: check you wallets before you even think about voting for the man who sees you as the OP who will hand over your M.
Sarah (Arlington, VA)
Oh yeah, a supposed bone spur was the last of Il Trumpolini's many deferments after Daddy-Dearest's influence didn't work anymore.

But then he compared his heavy skirt chasing to his very own Vietnam of not getting infected by STDs.

One has to wonder if he only 'dated' women who called him Mr. Trump.
Mr. John (New Orleans, LA)
I worked at one of the local net-owned TV stations during the years that Trump first emerged and he was a frequent visitor to all of the newsrooms in the city.

Please trust me on this one. After a tragic drive-by shooting in Queens took the life of a young mother, Donald called his publicist (the best in town) and said he, Donald, didn't want any publicity on it but he was picking up the funeral expenses for the family. The publicist then called the local news desks informing them that Donald didn't want anyone to know but he was picking up the entire cost, etc.

And as you surmised, the papers carried the story. Chalk one up for the Trump brand.
Mel (Dallas)
THE OATH I TOOK THAT THE COWARD DONALD TRUMP DODGED

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
N B (Texas)
Trump is our Kim Jong-un only he will have nukes that work. A vote for Trump is a vote go nuclear annihilation and moving to Canada won't protect you.
Al Rodbell (Californai)
How dare you impugn Donald Trumps admiration for the Military!.

Have you forgotten he was the Grand Marshall of the largest military parade ever in New York, the celebration of the 50th anniversary of VJ day in 1995. True, he never wore the uniform of our country, but those who did, with purple heart medals and stars on their shoulders to show for it, snapped a salute the him as they passed the reviewing stand.

Here's the link and a quote from the Times article about the event:

http://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/12/nyregion/on-parade-to-the-beat-of-hist...

"Also in the reviewing stand was the developer Donald Trump, who provided the only note of controversy in an otherwise positive day. Many veterans were angry that organizers had agreed to name Mr. Trump, who is not a veteran, as grand marshal in exchange for his contribution of $200,000 and help in raising additional funds."

AlRodbell.Com

Here's the Times article describing it.
pm (ny)
Its quite simple: Gail Collins is NYTimes best columnist.

And lets not waste time on balance - Hillary and Barack are many things - but they are reasonable politicians and human beings with many faults no doubt.

One thing I will say: many of Trump's supporters are people who are really suffering and angry with Washington. We should be aware of this and not write them off.
SusanFr (Denver, Colorado)
Oh that Donnie Moneybags. Isn't he a card? You just can't take him seriously, can you? Republicans! Wake up!
GG (New Windsor, NY)
Do you think Donald Trump is mad because he feels that the press treated him badly or is he mad because the press made him have to pay up to veterans organizations? Personally I think he is mad because he had to part with money he never intended to part with.
Bill (Ithaca, NY)
Dear Gail,
I think the answer to your multiple choice question is simpler: A.
Harley Leiber (Portland,Oregon)
Trump reminds me of the guy in Central Park doing the three card monte. He and his shills work the crowd, attract a bunch of people, takes their dough and moves on. In this case he's using the Vets. People will eventually wake up and see the game is rigged. Trump is a fake and a fraud.
Zib (California)
If Donald really started this thing as a way of keeping his "brand" in the eyes of the public, that may have backfired. Bookings at most of the Trump hotels is way down, and I think the majority of people have turned their view of the Trump brand from "wealth and excess" to disgust. His Trump U scam and other failed Trump steaks, etc are now well known, and likely to even succeed with the chumps who are willing to vote for him (most of them are on government entitlements anyway). The big loser from all of this will likely turn out to be Donald himself. Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
susan mccall (old lyme ct.)
Clearly Trump is unbalanced.Since he does nothing but lie and is running for President,we deserve to see 10 years of tax returns to see what this man has really been up to.Think it's time for a petition.Let's start one.
jackk (SF)
It is quite possible that Trump is worth less than $800M. It is quite possible that he is worth less than $0.00. It is known that he has huge (yuge...) loans from Deutsche Bank ($200M ) and other foreign creditors. What if he has a negative net worth and foreign banks and individuals are keeping him afloat. Would this not be a huge (yuge...) national security risk?
Bill at 66 (years old) (Portland OR)
I think that there is prescient moment available for all of us, including the current Trump supporters;
If Trump is willing to lash out and abuse his critics now from the speaker's podium (including but not limited to the press, fellow Republicans and Democrats but not limited to them), what do you think Trump would do with his critics if he were President in the privacy of the Oval Office with the full power of the presidency behind him? What will he do with the amount of information about private and public figures available to POTUS?
He would crush dissent in the press. Think of an exponential version of Dick Nixon with a further splash of Cheney nastiness and no moral compass at all...
Anyone but this guy...
Jonella (Boondox of Sullivan County, NY)
I love the way people keep saying Trump should act more presidential. What a crazy idea. This guy CAN'T act more presidential - He doesn't have it in him! When will people catch on?
I suspect he will do himself in, essentially, in a few weeks - maybe months. Maybe then the American people will finally figure out: This guy just ain't presidential material!! Could it possibly be more clear?
Let us HOPE they figure it out - before the election.
MFR (Canada)
On Trump's litigiousness: "The ideal client is the very wealthy man in very great trouble." -- John Sterling
Manuel Diaz (Santa Rosa)
Gail, maybe it took so long to make the donations because he was vetting the recipients, like making sure none of the money went to veterans who had gotten captured.
Harpo (Toronto)
Gail - Your insult in comparing Mr. Trump to President Nixon is unforgiveable. Nixon only engaged in despicable acts after he became president.
Seabiscute (MA)
How do you know?
Harpo (Toronto)
Well, he didn't brag about them.
Ronald Krol (Oregon)
So Trump considers Mexicans to be rapists and criminals. And he's building a yuge and byootiful wall because, you know, Mexicans. Why in God's name hasn't anyone gone after the fact that Trump's clothing line, the one sporting the "Made in Mexico" label is manufactured in the town of Tulancingo by Novalan Fabrics for Marcraft Apparel Group which has offices in Trump Tower in NYC?
Ethel Guttenberg (Cincinnait)
It is long past time that Donald Trump release his tax returns, at least for the last 8 years.
PD (Boston)
he won't release the tax returns -- because his story will turn out to be total fiction --
he is a charade
...and remember going to a "military" themed prep school was like being in the Military I was in basic training at 17 -- boarding school would have been more fun ...
SKC (Los Altos Hills, Ca)
"In fact, Trump never seemed to give much money to anybody."

Come on, Ms. Collins, this is not fair. I have no figures on hand but I bet Trump did give "much money" to both of his ex-wives.
kathleen (00)
Why doesn't Ms. Clinton run as a Republican, Mr. Sanders as a Democrat, Mr. Trump as a party rocker, and General Powell as an independent rescuer of the country? Voters would be less bamboozled and left with authentic choices, rather than this shimmering, glimmering, scary sideshow. Otherwise, the hairs stand up on the back of the neck like the quills on Hamlet's porpentine.
Bevan Davies (Kennebunk, ME)
How many more editorials do we need to get the point: Mr. Trump is a huckster, a fake, a fraud, a product of his own imagination. And yet, he has the colossal nerve to constantly attack the press? Please.
Neelie (Princeton, NJ)
Bernie Sanders also refers to himself in the third person, which is irritating.
eaguthrie (chesterfield, va)
“Because I wanted to make this out of the goodness of my heart,”

Why has no one in the press mentioned that most of the money raised was probably by generous hard-working middle/low income people responding to his January 'performance'. It is the goodness of their hearts & they had a right to know what happened to their contributions. That it wasn't sitting in an interest earning account in his own name.
bp (New Jersey)
"Why has no one in the press mentioned that most of the money raised was probably by generous hard-working middle/low income people responding to his January 'performance'. It is the goodness of their hearts & they had a right to know what happened to their contributions"

That's because the money raised came from Trump's billionaire friends and
no small contributions were taken from hard-working middle/low income people. This is just another example of the misinformation out there.
G. Nowell (SUNY Albany)
I would take Nixon over HRC or Trump in a heart beat.
stu freeman (brooklyn)
Walk among the headstones at any military cemetery and ask the dead who served in Vietnam whether they agree with you.
Dan Stackhouse (NYC)
Dear Stu Freeman,
I'd have to say, all our dead from Vietnam only added up to about 60,000 (including MIA's). The total dead in that war is estimated at 1,313,000, so our casualties were less than 1/20th of the deaths, very light. And both pale in comparison to how many will die when Trump stumbles and insults his way into nuclear war.
stu freeman (brooklyn)
@Dan Stackhouse: I'm not defending The Donald by any means but "only 60,000" dead U.S. servicemen represent 60,000 Americans who died needlessly. Let alone those who came home without limbs, etc., etc.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
I'm puzzled.

Many comments like this one suggest there's a MORAL underpinning to the commenter's distaste for Trump:

"But there are some of us voters who are tired of the obscenity that calls itself Donald Trump."

But the almost-inevitable upshot of every such complaint is "Therefore, I support Hillary!"

Does this mean the commenter thinks Hillary has good morals? Or does it mean simply that morals matter when one is evaluating Trump, but are ignored when one is evaluating Hillary?
Pete Kantor (Aboard sailboat in Ensenada, Mexicp)
For those who wonder who supports Trump, they need only go to AOL and read the comments on almost any topic, but in particular, any article mentioning Trump Clinton, or Sanders. The level of viciousness, ignorance and stupidity is well beyond what one could imagine. These are the supporters of Trump and a continuation of conservative legislators at state and federal levels.
Will Hochman (New Haven)
Mr. Trump is us. He represents our base instincts and eschews our evolving sense of helping each other and sharing more equally. He's America's bully. He's America's braggart. He's America's greed. He's America's ignorance. He's America's hate.

Even the high minded among us hate him.

At this point, no one can deny Mr. Trump's rhetoric and appeal to base instincts has been masterful. Are we becoming the America that amuses ourselves to death?

I am ashamed of how we are too often ruled by our base instincts and believe we may no longer be able to rise above our own selfishness to build a better democracy.

Like Gail Collins, I can only offer words on top of words that ask us to really think what we are creating for our future...right now we are betting our lives on this man who may well indeed be the father of our new, "great" fatherland, Trump's American Casino.
Be The Change... (California)
What does it say about a Republican (or anyone for that matter) who would back Donald Trump but not Merrick Garland (the Supreme Court nominee)? Just compare their credentials & records. The Republican party has definitely derailed...
Rob (WV)
The media keeps giving me more and more reasons to vote for Mr. Trump.
Majortrout (Montreal)
I haven't read any journalists writing about what Hillary Clinton gave to any charities or for that matter Mr. Sanders.

Ms. Collins' diatribe is typical of the NYTimes. Keep the news articles one-sided. Negative for Mr. Trump, and always positive for Hillary. As for Mr. Sanders, he's become a pariah - hardly any journalist writes anything about Mr. Sanders, but for the typical negativities thrown at him.

The NYTimes should balance their articles by inclusively adding all of the candidates to any article, and include balanced reporting, booth good and bad" for ALL the candidates.

For starters, I'd like to see what Hillary gave to any charities.

The last time I looked at a million, it was $ 1,000,000.00. And regardless who donated that sum, it's still a lot of money!
J Sowell (Austin, TX)
It isn't how much one gives. It is the spirit of the giving that counts. In Trump's case, his "donation" was pure self-promotion and a charade.

If you really want info on Clinton's charitable donations, conduct a simple web search (it's not that hard: try googling clinto charitable donations). You will discover the following, since Clinton has actually released her tax returns over an eight year period. From The Atlantic:

As for charitable donations, the Clintons gave just under $15 million over the eight-year period, which is 10.8 percent of their total income. The vast majority of that — about $14.8 million — went through the Clinton Family Foundation, the vehicle the Clintons frequently use to make personal donations, and another $57,000 went to the Clinton Global Initiative. The Clintons' other donations were to the Nelson Mandela Foundation ($60,000), Humana Challenge ($46,000), the First Methodist United Church ($20,000), Exploring the Arts ($4,100), St. Stephen's Armenian Apostolic Church ($2,500) and the Hot Springs Class of '64, Bill Clinton's high school graduating class in Arkansas ($200).
stu freeman (brooklyn)
Only The Donald made a big deal about giving a million bucks to the veterans. If Hillary or Bernie had done the same the media would have certainly followed up to ensure that the contribution had been made.
James Jordan (Falls Church, VA)
Gail,

It is clear that Mr. Trump is delusional. If the GOP has any sense they will pull the plug on Trump at Cleveland. Since this is a party show, one would think that the GOP leadership would do the wise thing and nominate an alternate candidate. My pick for the GOP is the former Mayor of NYC, Michael Bloomberg, who seems to be in touch with reality. We have plenty of problems that require solution and I think it maybe possible for Mr. Bloomberg to restore the broken GOP, and it is broken.

On your commentary regarding deferments for the political class. Being in uniform nowadays in the time of the all volunteer force means that most American families don't identify with military service, only a very small percentage of our finest choose to don the uniform.

The real payoff for those of ambition is to be a member of the rising professional class. A good start is to be involved in the US perpetual wars as a member of the military industrial complex as a contractor, or, the best and brightest coming out of our Ivy's can serve in government, in so called policy jobs, that can use the "revolving door" to land a super good job in the financial industry. It just makes more sense for any of our clever ones to avoid military service and go for the brass ring of public service in their resume.

Members of HS class of 1955 we were given an incentive to serve by Eisenhower's Universal Military Training Act and were eligible to take tests for college scholarships.
JLB (Los Angeles)
Ms. Collins always makes me laugh, and there is no shortage of things to laugh about when considering the bizarre candidacy of the Donald Trumpster, other than the fact that millions of people seem unconcerned about the obvious baggage he brings to the table and believe he would be the best choice to lead the country.
Harry (Olympia, WA)
The veterans story is unique. It is the only one I can think of where Trump acted rather than just bloviated. Thus he could be judged for deeds, not words. The WA Post did a magnificent job in exposing his "deeds." He didn't raise six million. He didn't donate until he had to. He erupted at a news conference in ways that showed he has little grasp of where he is and what he must be to win. Let this be the beginning of the end.
B Sharp (Cincinnati, OH)
When the Republicans swift boated a war hero John Kerry and gave us W that was low and never I thought after decades they will come up with Donald Trump. A little man with very low self esteem .
Could Trump become the President , yes he could .
ARF (Croton NY)
Trump is a ridiculous buffoon and yet many treat him as a serious candidate. The only rational explanation is that we live in one of two parallel universes. If they ever collide all matter will be obliterated.
Bill in Vermont (Norwich VT ( Brookline, MA no more))
One possible reason that delayed Mr Trump's accounting for the Veterans' contributions it that it simply takes him more time to count the currency than most guys, given the nature of his hands & fingers. Of course there may be others too.
Judy Creecy (Germantown, NY)
I can't wait to sit down with President Hillary Clinton, share a few beers, and lots of laughs about Donald Drumpf.
craig geary (redlands fl)
If Grifter Donald was seriously oh so fabulously rich would he really, really need to be grubbing for nickels with such a blatant rip off as Trump "University"?
We think not.
Harry (Michigan)
America deserves Trump. . One wonders if our military leaders will take orders from Richy Rich, I always wanted to witness first hand a military coup det at .
R Nelson (GAP)
Miss Manners' astute observation--uh, Mr. Trump?...

"It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities without your help."
JenD (NJ)
This column reminded me of Bob Garfield's wonderfully satirical piece, imagining if Trump gave the Gettysburg address. Worth another read: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/donald-trump-the-art-of-the-ad...
Kly (NY)
Oh man, you are so getting a letter!
JenD (NJ)
"People, I know you’re tired of hearing Donald Trump stories". YES, WE ARE!
Majortrout (Montreal)
Amen to that!

What I'd like to see is balanced journalism that included the good, the bad, and the ugly", for all 3 candidates, especially for Mr. Sanders, whom the NYTimes has not written much about.

Mr. Sanders is still running, Mr. Trump is today's pariah, and Ms. Clinton is the "princess" who is almost always perfect in the eyes of the NYTimes staff of journalists. Let's see some "real journalism" about the 3 candidates - warts and all!
Michael McAllister (NYC)
Trump is a rich target; and he deserves sarcastic broadsides. That said, his comments about the small crowd reflected his anticipation that the "Rolling Thunder" motorcycle rally for veterans was a bigger affair, not his sense that he is the equal of MLK.
While most sane and intelligent people can agree that Trump is appalling, why the media kid gloves for Hillary?
Her family foundation pulls in money two-fisted and their personal fortune now tops $100 Million. They paid their grossly unqualified daughter a "yuge" salary for a no-show job, and gave a lucrative Haiti relief initiative to First Brother, Roger Clinton, an infamous boob. Of course that led to the predictable train wreck. And why, Gail do you and the other ensconced media celebs hold such silence on Hillary's Wall Street speeches? And you are just as mumm on her neo-con track record and bloody minded mentors like Blumenthal, Wolfowitz, Kissinger, Albright. A salad of tragedy and farce.
Dave S (<br/>)
Maybe Trump thought giving a thousand rounds of golf to disabled vets would take care of his boast. And then repay himself from campaign contributions. I'm sure the big tickets donors wouldn't mind.
tbs (detroit)
The polls show: Sanders beats Trump; Trump beats Clinton. Curious to see what the Democrats do.
Ken L (Atlanta)
I cannot wait for Wednesday, November 9, when this Trump nightmare will finally be over. Five more months of this? Oy.
Dan Stackhouse (NYC)
Agreed, only it's still possible that either the Trump nightmare will be over, or America's disastrous plummet to crushing failure in every respect will have begun.

Once anarchy takes hold, after our economy expires, then in the name of president Trump I swear I'm going to find and eliminate every supporter of him that I can, for the good of our species.
Mark (Chicago)
One of the stranger and most disappointing endorsements of Trump by increasingly nihilistic, shameless, and spineless Republicans is that of John McCain. Any sympathy one may have had for him after Trump's attack, any residuum of respect for a genuine war hero vanishes. The one man with the national reputation to stand up to a demagogue has collapsed.

I suppose that like poor Fritz von Papen in 1932, the establishment believes they will have this little Trump under their control. We know how that turned out.
Larry Heimendinger (WA)
I am always anticipating Gail's columns, I need her insights and the laughs she can conjure up. But I am asking her to refrain from humor in columns about Trump: he is no laughing matter.

On second thought, refrain from columns about Trump.
Tokyo Tea (NH, USA)
Trump has manipulated media attention to raise himself up as a candidate.

Wouldn't it be poetic justice if his use of media attention would be the thing that brought him down?

I hope we still have enough citizens with working brains for this to happen.
Don Beringer (Delavan, WI.)
Real "class" does not have to announce itself or its achievements, it just is. It would be nice to think that Donald Trump has an alternative trajectory of elevated behavior which protected the weak and gave hope to the downtrodden--good luck! What you see is what you get. There is no blow too low for him to hit; under even the lightest criticism, there is no one immune to his Don Rickles shtick. The man has no class. Worse still, his presumption to having any is an affront to the voters and to those he attacks.
JayK (CT)
The "media" created him, and the media can destroy him by simply telling the truth about him.

Fox News and Rupert Murdoch could have killed his candidacy in it's crib, but they were too craven to do it. By the time they woke up, the monster was out of the cage and it was too late to do anything.

His con is starting to unravel because the "real" media is finally starting to do their job.

Trump University and this Vet charity fiasco are surely just the tip of the iceberg with this charlatan. Everything about him is phony.

Even his hair is dishonest.

He won't release his tax returns because they will prove that he's not a "billionaire". Ms. Collins had posited many years ago that he's a "thousandaire", and that is probably much closer to the truth about this fraudster.

If they backed up the claims of his wealth, he would have happily released them by now.

The NYT needs to keep the heat on this phony until he self destructs. He started to unravel at that press conference by attacking the entire press corps. He's not built to withstand real scrutiny, he's designed for the tabloid press.

Do your job.
Rick D (New York, NY)
Trump was able to avoid military service because his foot was in his mouth and he didn't think he really had to give money to the vets because his fingers were crossed behind his back when he said that he would. It is inconceivable to me that people could support a candidate that really doesn't like people.
Rahn Keucher (Enon, Ohio)
Honestly, no, it does not make me feel better.
dpr (California)
It's almost as though John Falstaff has stepped out of a Shakespeare play and onto the American political stage. Vain, boastful, ribald and cowardly. Through his newfound love of veterans, Mr Trump can curry favor among a group of men with whom he has almost nothing in common. Too bad for him that the Washington Post forced him to put his money where his mouth is.
KJ (Tennessee)
I know a couple of people who support Trump (no more than that, for which I am thankful) and I've noticed that when you try to point out his many, many short-comings, they simply start talking more loudly than you. Very much like Trump himself.

Perhaps the cartoonists of America will have to be mobilized to share the truth about this vile man, because his supporters apparently don't read the news.
Edgar (New Mexico)
Donald Trump used the fund raising to get votes from Veterans, or to make up for John McCain comments, or to put money into his foundation, or as free publicity or all of the above. He used Veterans. Unforgivable.
mikeyh (Poland, Ohio)
mikeyh wishes this election was over, it's making mikeyh sick to his stomach.
skippy (nyc)
Hate is a very strong, ugly word. I HATE Donald J. Trump.
Douglas McNeill (Chesapeake, VA)
Match the individual with the character traits:

A) Humility, introspection, wisdom, patience, forbearance, charity
B) Narcissism, anger, volatility, acerbity, miserliness, selfishness

1) Donald Trump
2) The Dalai Lama

Whom would you like as your leader?
Lake Woebegoner (MN)
I'm sure that stealing all that artwork and memorabilia after she left the White House wouldn't rise to this level of malfeasance, would it Gail?

Seems to me that Hillary is an equal tightwad. But with our money.
Paul Niquette (Jugon-les-Lacs, France)
To play the debt game, “Incongruities of Wealth,”
Leverage your balance sheet; show a state of poor health.
To avoid paying tax,
Best hide all the facts;
Read Trump’s campaign book: “The Art of the Stealth”
FGPalace (Bostonia)
For New Yorkers or people who were in New York sometime during the late 1970s throughout the 1980s (if you don't believe there is a difference then you are definitely not a New Yorker) know Trump and his modus operandi.

The Donald is a New Yorker of the worst kind. Meaning he is obnoxious, arrogant, an ignorant blowhard, who can flatter, charm, or threaten his way out of any situation, emphasis on any. It does not matter whether the issue is getting a pretzel or a permit to demolish a landmark building.

Nothing is more important to Trump than winning than the appearance of winning. He must seem to win even when he loses.

One thing the Donald ever struggled to obtain was public respect and admiration, until now. He knows it is one thing to admire the buildings, atria, and resorts bearing his name, another is to admire him. Yet the sad part is that now he is truly admired, even respected by millions of people, the very people he spent a lifetime avoiding and despising.

He really means it when he says that if he does not win, the whole thing would have been a "Yuuuge waste of time." I can't wait.
Charles Michener (Cleveland, OH)
As usual, Gail Collins' indignation is highly amusing. I wish her columns were read by Trump supporters. But, Gail, how about training your keen eye on the other front-runner, Hillary Clinton. It's going to be a rude wakeup call to the Times' pundits, reporters and editors who wake up a week from now to the news that under-reported Bernie Sanders has won the California primary. If so, Mrs. Clinton has only her many missteps and lapses of good judgment to blame - a worthy subject for the indispensable Ms. Collins.
alvnjms (asheville)
perhaps all of us can engage a cartographer to creat a map showing where Dick Cheney hid from Vietnam. It would go so well with the one rhe Cheneys themselves had made showing the Civil War battles a forebear participated in.
Winthrop (I'm over here)
I have read that Marlene Dietrich and her daughter would occasionally strategize a situation by asking "What would 'Dietrich' do?" 'Dietrich,' was of course, the public persona that they had fabricated.
Likewise, we have here DT, the prep school bad boy, poseur for the presidency. He needs help, not needling from lady reporters.
toom (Germany)
Trump has to save his money for all of those signs showing "TRUMP!" is big gaudy letters and the constant visits to the hairdresser.
NM (NY)
And this ignorant opportunist named Trump thinks he has the authority to chide President Obama for 'treating the veterans terribly?'
And Trump's cheerleader, Sarah Palin, thinks it's OK to blame her son's PTSD on President Obama for not allowing him to 'kick ISIS' butt?'
And please remind me why John McCain could stand by Trump.
Hilary (New York City)
He probably had planned to make his million dollar donation in the form of discounted fees for an event at one of his golf courses. I think most of his philanthropy has been the sponsorship/PR variety. One can imagine the equivalent approach to foreign aid or poverty relief...
Robert Eller (.)
Please everbody, vote for Hillary, so we can finally get back to paying attention to the Kardashians, as we should be doing. Thanks.
manfred marcus (Bolivia)
Crooked lying Trump sounds 'almost' funny in his self-serving remarks. His only interests, no matter what his big mouth spells out, is himself, veterans be damned, qualifying him as the biggest hypocrite this side of the Atlantic. And well deserved.
Marc Whitehead (Portland, Oregon)
Gail, I just hope after the election, like Richard Nixon, we won't have Trump to kick around anymore.
After his huge defeat, I think that big loser will take his small hands and dig himself a hole to crawl into, but only after blaming his enormous defeat on everybody but himself.
SCZ (Indpls)
Trump is a true shyster. He has no respect for P. O.W.S; he only likes vets who weren't captured. He has trouble giving real money. I think he was trying to figure out a way to give to vets by sending them all on a big golf outing.
lfkl (los ángeles)
Good one Gail. I wonder why a reporter doesn't ask the real estate guy this simple question.

"Mr Trump. Taking you at you word that you are worth 10 billion dollars why don't you just take 1 1/2 billion dollars of your own money to finance your campaign? Surely you could manage to get through the rest of your life on 8 1/2 billion dollars.
Kurt Pickard (Murfreesboro, TN)
You know Gail several months ago I thought America needed a sharp tounged business man to set things straight in Washington. Let's be fair, Obama has done nothing to bridge the gap between the aisle in Congress. Why not another Harry Truman type A personality or better yet a Lyndon Johnson? So when a guy like Trump came along he initially ignited those passions within me that America was going to be great again. But as time has worn on, the Trump show has evolved into some crazy B movie plot where a lunatic mesmerizes the masses, wins the presidency and sets the whole world against our country. But then I tell myself that Americans can't be that gullible. After all Nazi Germany wasn't that long ago; we still remember those lessons, don't we?
Perspective (Bangkok)
All correct, Ms Collins. And all fair. But the effect of columns like this one will be to harden support for Mr Trump among voters who believe that the NYT set looks down on them. So you really need to find a better approach to saving the Republic from this man. And don't say that you were not warned.
Lee (Chicago)
Trump cares about no one but himself. He was forced to give a million dollard to veterans by the Washington Post reporter. This is what the media should do-- that main stream media holds him accountable relentlessly to expose what a fraud he is, for the sake of the country. It is time to counter punch this man.
Elliott Jacobson (Claymont, DE)
Today the NYT had a front page story on HRC's strategy to be articulated in an upcoming speech. The speech attacks Trump as someone who would threaten world order as if this was a brilliant coup. It didn't take long for Trump to respond simply using Bernie Sanders' attack on HRC's decision making regarding Iraq and Libya. Donald Trump has run a thoroughly honest campaign even when he brazenly lies or flips his position. Donald is as open a book as any presidential candidate in memory in which the image corresponds with fact. He has been campaigning for a year, been attacked by the media non stop and received more coverage than all of the other candidates combined. His recklessness has been on display all year as have the attacks from all quarters and yet he has, after easily winning the Republican nomination, a real chance to win in November. Yet this is HRC's campaign to lose. She has every imaginable demographic advantage, a winning, heartland personality, experience that it is hoped she has learned from and a politically skilled husband. In an e-mail her campaign sent out, the subject line read "You vs. Donald". For me, that was the first time I had read a line HRC's campaign that hit a home run. It should be the key message of the campaign
Saba (Montgomery NY)
At the bikers' rally, Trump blamed the small crowd on failures by his staff.
Oliver (Key West)
Or Ted Baxter along with his Famous Broadcasters' School, minus the sweetness and humanity.
Sharon5101 (Rockaway Beach Ny)
No Gail--we have to go "there." I'm tired to death of the media's non-stop hero worship for John McCain. McCain shamelessly parlayed his Viet Nam POW experience right into the US Senate where he's had an iron clad guaranteed Senate seat ever since. Hey McCain is just as opportunistic as any politician running for office and he's going whatever tools he has at his disposal to persuade the public to elect him. So Donald Trump didn't go to Viet Nam. Quite frankly, who cares??

When are we going to stop fighting the Viet Nam war in every presidential election cycle? Enough is enough and it's time we grew up and moved on.
TheBronx (New York)
When a Vietnam draft dodger (oh, he had bad feet) insults a war hero who spent several years under extreme conditions in a North Vietnam POW camp, this is a very serious character issue.

He actually insulted ALL American POWs. Is that someone that should be Commander-In-Chief? It has nothing to do with the Vietnam War and everything to do with the candidate.
AJBF (NYC)
Gail, Trump and Nixon are not the only ones to refers to themselves in the third person. Bernie Sanders does the same.
JT FLORIDA (Venice, FL)
The media are finally waking up to the circus that is the Donald Trump campaign. He also took a hit yesterday when a major world golf championship moved from Trump's Doral in Miami to (gasp) Mexico City prompting one player to say, " We'll just go through the wall to get there." Even the PGA Tour commissioner got into the act saying that the course was so identified as a brand{Trump] that sponsors were jumping ship on staging such an event in Miami.
rooney (slc)
actually, it was Roby McIlroy who said "we'll just jump over the wall" Seems funnier that way. btw, if you're counting trump lies (a number approaching his net worth) he stated that Cadillac wanted to re-sign but the PGA wouldn't let them.
Mookie (Washington DC)
You're so right, Gail. Trump never served in combat.

Unlike Hillary Clinton who bravely dodged sniper fire in Bosnia.
Or flew an F16 to save the Libyan ambassador in Benghazi.
Or was a Navy seal who took out Osama Bin Laden.

Hillary Clinton. War Hero.
TheBronx (New York)
Trump was drafted during the Vietnam War and got out of it via bad feet. Was Hillary Clinton drafted? Big difference!
Fibonacci (White Plains, NY)
Mookie mocking Hillary much? Hillary still gets out there, gets something done, things not always turn out perfectly -- they are setbacks and so -- but things move along and ahead. Can't say much about the exposure and experience of Trump and the other one.
R Nelson (GAP)
"It is not unusual for presidential candidates to have avoided military service. Bill Clinton did. Bernie Sanders did. Most of Congress did. Dick Cheney got himself five deferments — and, O.K., when it came to Dick Cheney we took offense."

PuhLEEZE, Gail--do not conflate Bernie Sanders' record on military service with that of Dick Cheney! The mealy-mouthed "avoided military service" makes the remark only slightly the other side of true. Sanders has been consistent over many decades in his objection to war fought for the wrong reasons. The fact is that he applied for conscientious objector status--willing, in other words, to do alternate service--and then was too old for the draft when his number came up. Check it out, folks:

http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-dodged-draft/

I'd hate to think that Gail is deliberately sliming Bernie by association in order to elevate another candidate who never served in uniform either and whose husband was only against that war and avoided the draft--granted, with deferments accorded to him as a Rhodes scholar. Check that out, and don't take alarm at the link, since the article firmly debunks the libelous lie that spawned it:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/felon.asp
Charles PhD (New Orleans)
No matter what might be said truthfully of all the others, whoever they may be, Trump is in a class by himself and really does deserve all the ridicule and hostility he receives. Just listen to him, people, and hear what he says. Just listen.
Deborah (Ithaca ny)
I keep trying to figure out a single image
that will explain the awfulness of Trump and lock it down. How about that body full of rattlesnakes in the cave in "True Grit?" Nah, snakes are focused and voiceless. Trump isn't like a snake. Some kind of orange orangutan? Heavens no, orangutans are sociable, and their hair isn't held on their heads with tiny bolts (see: Trump, $60,000 weave job, Ivari, reported in Gawker). Maybe the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man in "Ghostbusters"? That's closer. Sticky, weightless yet thunderous, destructive, fiery. Simple faced. Walks Manhattan. Thinks he's a big big guy. Big baby.

In this article, Gail Collins acknowledges that many people have blamed the media for giving Trump so much air time and thereby granting him power. (Remember: Stay-Puft). That may be true, but now it's time for journalists to focus on this Republican candidate and expose his simplifications, his lack of real policies, his racism, his cocky misogyny, his inconsistencies, and his lies and sidesteps.

There are other American stories of course that tell about men leading their followers astray and sinking ships. Remember Ahab? Well Trump is kind of like Ahab ... without the brain, soul, voice, courage, or spirit.

A new American nightmare in the closet. And not just a threat to us. A threat to the world.

Ah, stories. They warn us.
paula (south of boston)
thank you for writing this, Deborah. The Stay-Puft man analogy is the best. !
Bismarck (North Dakota)
It would be karma if someone from North Dakota was worth more than Trump....
Alice (Texas)
Actually, there is someone in Nebraska who is worth more than Trump - both financially and morally. And if anyone with no political experience could step in and run this country, it is the man from Omaha, not the clown from Queens.
Jeffrey Waingrow (Sheffield, MA)
He will, sooner or later, be hoist by his own petard. We will be too if we don't get him off the stage asap.
Marion H. Campbell (Bethlehem, PA)
I don't expect you will want you to publish this; that's ok. I enjoy Ms. Collins' column very much. However, I cringe every time that I'm swept up to be addressed among the "People". It's so schoolmarm; I feel as if I'm back in second grade with Mrs. Putnam at PS 11 in 1949. How about "Reader"; I think that has some literary precedent.

Marion H. Campbell, Bethlehem, PA
TheraP (Midwest)
I love it when she does that! It means she's talking directly to us! She is one of us!

Thank you Gail. And congrats to all us People!
C.L.S. (MA)
What about ... 'dear Reader'?

Or the ever popular 'Gentle Reader'?

If it was good enough for Thackery, it should be good enough for you.
Julia (NY)
I love the expression. Hello, people...wake up. Although I do remember another sideof the coin- as a teen in rebellion I once called my parents 'you people'--and I do mean once.
Pat (NY)
Every new day tops the day before with the garbage that comes out of Trump's mouth. I truly believe he talks on a fifth-grade level because that's all his mind can process.

His emotional growth is stunted at the age of an 11-year-old spoiled-rotten, cheap, vane, highly insecure, beyond-boastful, multi-adulterous, shameless, petulant, overly needy, vile and vindictive, uncouth, classless, unthinking, manipulative, draft-dodging, inconsistent, unaware-of-the-world, cowardly loud-mouth, tax-evading, audience-seeking, brutish, hyper-hypocritical, untrustworthy, sexist, dictatorial, embarrassment-to-the-world racist, textbook-pathological, mentally unbalanced, narcissistic bigot with violent tendencies and temperament whose only smarts lie in the juvenile ability to call people childish playground names and entertain his supporters.
Steven (Marfa, TX)
Just like all too many fellow Americans I have met! He is the benchmark for The Ugly American, but he is certainly not alone in this characteristic Profile in Cowardice.
paula (south of boston)
wait, you left out "ugly"..otherwise, you nailed it.
JD (Philadelphia)
You left out the gratuitous slurs at the press who interviewed him. Clearly Trump is slowly starting to unravel. He's been playing this game for so long and with so many faces that he's losing track of what he's said, whom he's talking to and in what direction he is pointed. Bill Kristol's new moniker for him, "Roaring Jackass", is sticking. By November, RJ will be sitting alone in an office somewhere in the deep recesses of Trump Tower, babbling away like Norman Bates, occasionally blurting out "You're fired! You're fired!"
i's the boy (Canada)
"A foot thing," that would be foot in mouth disease, that somehow, has become so appealing.
Montreal Moe (WestPark, Quebec)
Gail,
I know America's media and have seen more than too much of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump knows America's media . Donald knows America's media coverage is for sale he just is upset he hasn't got the kind of money it takes to buy it.
Contrary to popular opinion the US does not have a free press in fact it is very very expensive.
Connie (NY)
Get your facts straight. On CNN: KALLSTROM: "We did get a million dollars from Donald. He's been a big supporter of veterans groups for close to four decades now, Carol. I knew for some time that we were gonna be the recipient. I didn't know the actual amount. But I guess it was about a week ago. Don't hold me to that. Some week ago, ten days ago, and we actually received money." Trump was honored by this foundation, the Marine Corps-Law enforcement prior to running for president at a banquet at the Waldolf-Astoria. The constant unfair articles and editorials in the NYTimes about Trump is getting totally outrageous! Come on. Is this paper becoming a scandal sheet. Sometimes it seems like the gossip edition of the DNC.
Greg M (Maine)
I'd much prefer Nixon to Trump. Fortunately Hillary is also not a crook, so I'll be voting for her.
D Berggren (Chicago)
Ms. Collins, Thanks for the article. I'm curious, what will be "The Donald's" version of Mitt Romney's dog on the roof of the car? The possibilities are overwhelming!
Fred (Georgia)
Whenever a candidate says "Trust me", you shouldn't!

Unfortunately, I see "Idiocracy" playing out. Trump did too when he said "I love the poorly educated." If elected, he'll bring us the "Redemption Games" in the "Trump Colosseum" which he will build, and it will be so luxurious, more luxurious than that mess in Rome.

"I weep for the future."
Fred (Up North)
A bit off-topic but perhaps if we had more politicians who were veterans we'd have few wars?
Also, I am trying to go a whole day without thinking about he-who-must-not-be-named.
buttercup (cedar key)
The only thing Dumold Trump and Martin Luther King have in common was their almost continuous coverage by the world news media.

One as a national treasure

And one as a national disgrace
Bob (Rhode Island)
Trump, Koch, Adelson, Walton...these are the kinds of dirtbags the Founding Fathers were trying to stop from oozing all over America with their vile greed.
They knew if people had more money than countries they would turn evil.
One look at the slimey list above and it's clear we let the Founding Fathers down.
These billionaires have created a monarchy right under our nose and we let 'em.
Thankfully we haven't yet sunk so low as to allow trash like Little Hands to be President.
Oh, stop, Trump doesn't stand a literate's chance in Mississippi of winning in November but the fact that he did win the confederate nomination is concerning.
AnnieB (NYC)
"Out of the goodness of his heart?" These are funds donated by other people, not Trump's. Yet again we see another Trump sleight of hand.
Miss Ley (New York)
We may be tired of hearing Trump stories, but many of us are reading this latest one of Tightwad, because what you have to say is always of interest to your admirers and delivered with wit and style.
Nan Socolow (West Palm Beach, FL)
Skinflint Trump is a scam artist, a sham and after his shouting rant against the sleazy press about his YUGE donations to veterans yesterday, is an obviously unfit candidate for our Presidency. Finally, Hillary Clinton has hit on the right way to stick a sharp pin in Trump's enormous Thanksgiving Day parade balloon and hopefully bring him down to where the rubber meets the road. When Donald Trump's campaign for the RNC GOP Presidential nomination finally runs off the cliff like Wiley Coyote in the Road Runner cartoons, his efforts at aggrandizement and emperor-creating at the expense of millions of cheated Americans will be revealed as the greatest hoax since the Cardiff Giant, the Fiji Mermaid and Piltdown Man. Chutzpah and gall and pulling the wool over decent Americans' eyes should not be - and will not be - rewarded with the key to a Trump White House.
TheraP (Midwest)
Wonderful mixed metaphors for a Mixed Personality Disorder!
Bob (Rhode Island)
And don't forget Ronald Reagan and John Wayne.
Two rightist heroes who chickened out of World War II but we're somehow morphed into the quintessential tough guys by the rightist spin doctors.

That being said, even milquetoast Reagan looks tough when compared to Little Hands.
Eli (Boston, MA)
From all the politicians that you mentioned the only one who was NOT a draft dodger was Bernie Sanders. He was a conscientious objector.

He had NO FAKE FOOT AILMENTS or did not join the National Guard under false premises to make sure he ends up in Germany rather than Vietnam.

Sanders was a true patriot opposing an evil war. He risked bodily harm fighting protesting the war in the streets of America. This was much more brave than killing babies and women bombing them from an airplane. Millions of innocent civilians lost their lives in Vietnam. Bernie Sanders and millions of patriotic Americans tried to stop the war machine that enriched the Military Industrial Complex as Eisenhower called it.

Bernie Sanders applied for a conscientious objector status during the Vietnam War draft, but was too old to be drafted when his number came up. He was already a veteran of different kind. Veteran of the protest war in the streets of America to keep Vietnam Veterans away from harm's way.
WHM (Rochester)
Eli, One thread of comments is that it is not the Donald who is the problem, he is clearly a somewhat troubled fellow who is way out of his depth. The problem is the many supporters he has who probably shaped his nasty comments , searching until he had the found most news worthy. It is somewhat the same with Sanders. Sanders himself is great, but he seems to have a lot of followers with no sense of political history who want to beatify him. I personally find the left-wing curmudgeon from Vermont far preferable to saint Bernie.
ann (ct)
While I respect Bernie's conscientious objector status to say that he was braver than the 18 and 20 year old boys who were drafted is grossly unfair. One look at the Vietnam War Memorial will prove that. And most Vietnam Vets are not proud that they ended up participating in an unjust war. In addition as a veteran war protester I can attest that my life was never in danger. Short of the tragedy at Kent State I can think of no other incident where a war protester was killed. You must have a gross misunderstanding of the Vietnam War era.
georgiadem (Atlanta)
As the daughter of a Vietnam Vet Marine I take issue wth your categorizing and demonizing soldiers, the most of whom are not baby killers. Talk about being stuck in a mindset....I lived through this time too, and am proud of my military father and upbringing. My father volunteered for the Marines and risked his life over there as the father of 5 children from ages 1 to 14 yrs. It is offensive to say the least to have the label of "baby killer" yet again used to blanket all Vietnam Vets.
Dan Stackhouse (NYC)
Hilarious, true, and terrifying. Funny that Richard Nixon is mentioned, compared to Trump he looks fantastic in retrospect. Let's face it, Watergate was unimportant and harmless, at least Nixon was well-informed, rational, capable of diplomacy, and had all sorts of other skills that Trump lacks.

So Trump held off on a charitable donation he'd promised until forced to keep his word. This is hardly the worst thing about him. The thing is, he's an ignorant, inexperienced, sexist, bigoted, fascist bully. He's completely unqualified to be president in any way. And his army of angry, ignorant, racist supporters may put him in the White House.

So laugh all you want, but if this monster is not stopped, our nation is doomed. And if he gets elected, we deserve doom, and we will have proven that capitalistic democracy simply doesn't work.
Robert (Houston, TX)
"Let's face it, Watergate was unimportant and harmless, at least Nixon was well-informed" Joseph Stalin was pretty well informed, too. You have to be completely inured to the myriad invasions of privacy that have become the norm to propose that breaking and entering to steal private papers was unimportant and harmless. Like also breaking and entering, and stealing the psychiatric records of Daniel Ellsberg, of Pentagon Papers fame.
Dan Stackhouse (NYC)
You're right Robert, Joseph Stalin also looks a lot better than Trump.
Gary (New York, NY)
This is probably the wake-up call we've been needing. While any society will have ignorant and arrogant people, it's all about percentages. Those who vote for Trump are ignorant and arrogant, blind to the reality of who Trump really is. You cannot reason with these people. They are "damaged goods." How did they get this way? Probably a combination of poor parenting (anemic values) and a lousy education. We need to turn things around and help the next generation of Americans become sensible educated people with solid moral fiber. But we can't do that if education and parenting are continually treated as non-essential concerns.
Doris Caliguiri (Deer Park, N Y)
Gary, it's not the parenting. My brother and sister were raised by the same parents as I was but we can't discuss Obama nor this election. Trump is the savior to them to deliver them from I don't know what. If an earth quake occurred,nit would be Obama's fault. I really don't think they hear what Trump really is saying, and if they did, they like what he said. I cringe. I worry too for the future if Trump wins. My college friends and I are getting together for a weekend to discuss what to do if there is this outcome. No amount of wine is gonna numb the pain.
sdw (Cleveland)
When you build a sort-of empire involving real estate you sort-of own, financed almost exclusively by other peoples’ money, the idea of using your own money for anything – let alone a donation, for God’s sake – never crosses your mind.

As far as donating your very own money to a group of veterans, when you have referred to your efforts in the 1960s and 1970s to avoid a sexually transmitted disease as your “personal Vietnam,” you don’t see things the way the rest of us do.

So, to the list of Donald Trump’s presidential qualifications, let us add cheap and irrelevant.
Pam (NYC)
There seems to be a parallel between the character of the angry disaffected Trump gang and that of the disaffected young followers of ISIS.
Manderine (Manhattan)
Gail, even if Drumpf murdered someone on Fifth Ave, as he claims, he would still have devotees. Sure they would follow him to prison, and watch his trial televised in a media circus. His defense, "They were a looser who was taking jobs away from Americans. I shot back in self defense to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN".
So murder isn't the way to stop his supporters, BUT, if he should murder someone, it would automatically disqualify his presidential candidacy in 2016.
George (NYC)
Donald would be the first president who could lose his dignity under the ministration of a fairly brisk wind.

Here's a man that won't even admit he's bald.

Weak.
the doctor (allentown, pa)
Elizabeth Warren has Trump pegged about right. He's a low-life "money grubber".
Rob &amp; Eric (<a href="http://icygaze.com" title="icygaze.com" target="_blank">icygaze.com</a>)
Remember how upset the GOP was about Bill Clinton's frequent deferments to study at Oxford, even though he was quite candid about his suspicions about the draft's legality and his disagreement with Vietnam policy? Yet Trump, who loves all things military and likely agreed with Vietnam strategy (given his recent comments about bombing ISIS) seems to get a free pass when it comes to his refusal to serve. This is what happens when we treat politics like team sports, and always vote with our allegiance to Rs and Ds regardless of their player's abilities. And while I would think the military and veterans alike would be tired of being used by Republicans as a way to generate public support and instead rally around the party least likely to put their lives in danger, they seem to reflexively pull the lever for whichever R is on the ballot. How a group of privileged white men who never served in the armed forces earned a reputation as tough guys is a mystery to me (but I'd bet it has something to do with football).

When no one pays attention to what their players are saying because the other side is *always wrong*, when binary thinking is the depth of one's political knowledge, we should all start questioning the democratic system itself. Some voters clearly are not up to the responsibility, and frankly, I'm not sure why their vote should be equal to those of us who pay attention.
Mark Clevey (Ann Arbor, MI)
As a Veteran, I find donald trump's efforts to use veterans as a political tactic abusive in the extreme. Given his complete lack of military service (or any other kind of public service for that matter (e.g., Americorp, Peace Corp, etc.), open disdain for prisoners of war, and dislike for veterans as a whole, I have no doubt that he would cavalierly put Americans in harms way just to satisfy his narcissism. To die for your country is one thing; to die for donald trump is another. This traitor-to-America needs to be politically fragged by real veterans now!
Walter Nieves (Suffern, New York)
Trump's contempt for the role of the media should be of concern both to Democrats and Republicans. The questions that are raised over his relationship to veterans groups and Trump University go to the heart of what he is about and the kind of person he is.

We do not have in Trump, someone with an elected track record or someone that has written a book on political issues. We do not know a thing about the private Trump other than he likes his world gilded in gold. It is no wonder that he has contempt for the press, reporters and indirectly the public that wants substantive answers to real questions and not just media events.

The real world is not a TV studio that will embrace him for his entreatment value …hopefully he understands this.
John (Here)
For what it's worth, not much I suppose, this too will not stick. So one has to wonder why NYT columnists persist in their "look at what Trump did today" musings. Is it cathartic? Has Trump's inexplicable unstickiness laid bare the commentariat's own lack of insight, direction or sincerity?

What's that old saw about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results? Yes, Gail, I do want reporters to just drop the subject. Try something different for a change.
Patrick (Ithaca, NY)
"Have we ever had a president who referred to himself in the third person? The answer, as a number of readers have been kind enough to point out is — yes! We had Richard Nixon."

I just heard in my head, in Nixon's voice, "I am not a crook."

Trump that!
ACW (New Jersey)
Trump is quite possibly the most loathesome excresence to mar the face of politics in my 61 years of life, which encompasses a lot of awful politicians.
However, using ordinary citizens as props has always been part of the game. Kissing babies, wearing ethnic headgear, eating local cuisine at county fairs, marching in whatever parade is passing, whether St Pat's or LGBT Pride or Salute to Israel or Puerto Rican Day or Memorial Day.
Any time you find yourself in proximity to a politician, ANY politician, who is pretending concern for you, be aware you are being used as a prop. Trump is no different in that respect, nor is he different in making promises he then doesn't keep. He's simply far more shameless, and, ironically, less competent at the game. Most politicians don't get called out on their hypocrisy, superficiality, exploitation, or egotism. Trump's manipulation is so blatant and so inept it can't be shrugged off or overlooked.
Adirondax (mid-state)
Kick the Trump can is a popular political ridiculing game but misses the point.

The real issue isn't Trump.

The real issue is the economically disenfranchised folks that support him. With good reason I might add. At least he's offering them the scent of what might be a living wage job sometime in the future. (I don't for a minute believe he's capable of that, but that's another matter.)

Hillary Clinton is the candidate of the .1% and will do nothing while in office, other than complain about the obstructionist Congress.

Sanders notion is to swing for the socialist justice fences, and good on him for making this front and center in his campaign.

Some version of Sanders' positions is what the country needs to move ahead.

1. Taxes on the wealthy, including any carried interest profits.
2. Taxes on corporations, including those who are "legally" moving the headquarters to some quaint place like Ireland to avoid paying taxes.
3. Single payer health care.
4. Affordable college education for the young.
5. A sophisticated industrial policy program which brings manufacturing jobs back from China and encourages new ones.
6. An infrastructure jobs works program.

Can we afford all of this? Others do. Those nations don't spend gobs of cash on an overbloated and unnecessary military, which itself is a national jobs program, albeit one without any really benefits for those here at home.

Let's get America back to work.

Now.

Then Trump will go back where he came from.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
"Let's get America back to work. Now. Then Trump will go back where he came from."

That's exactly what voters are saying. If you don't like Trump, that's understandable. What's not understandable is why that leads you to Hillary. That part I just don't get.
AMM (NY)
Another Sanders troll. Enough with the Socialists. As someone else put it in these pages, they keep everybody poor.
tom (boyd)
Trump says "Our wages are too high." Don't the Trump supporters know he said that? Or if they knew, do they know that it means he doesn't support a "living wage job sometime in the future?" An old saying I know is "you can't fix stupid."
Mike S (Portland)
Wow. We just learned another facet of what makes Trump a most vile human being. I'm not surprised he is a complete hypocrite when it comes to supporting veterans, and I shouldn't be surprised when the neo liberal right wing whack jobs accuse the liberal press of attacking poor Donald, but they will.
Attack away,
robertm (New York, NY)
Hopefully, in a not-too-future speech, we'll hear Trump declare that we "won't have The Donald Trump to kick around anymore." Just before he leaves for some island fortress where he can dominate the natives.
Gerard (PA)
If I may comment on the comments:
To those who ask for balance - for Gail to castigate Clinton for her faults as she does Trump - I would offer that there is no balance in the subject matter. Clinton has flaws, of course, but Trump just keeps on doubling down, piling horror on horror. Clinton has policies to persuade; Trump has whistles.
Equitable reporting does not mean equal column-inches of criticism, but it does include reporting news as it happens - and Trump is happening every day all over the carpet.
Jack Daniels (Atlanta Ga)
Barack Obama has failed to lead this country to a successful recovery as each quarter we hear about a .5% increase in GDP, past presidents have put up 5/6/7% increases in GDP.. Media Bias refusing to bring this up? sure..

Also consider that the majority of jobs created under Obama have been part time jobs.. You can thank Obamacare and it's 30 hours a week or more as the definition of a full time job, so now we get 29 hour a week jobs.. Thanks Obama.

Where are the rest of the liberal lemmings? Do you people not bother to look rationally at the failures of Obama and his liberal policies? over 95 million Americans are out of the job market. This should make every American nervous..
mark korte (montana #34;formerly Missouri#34;)
What I find striking is the fact that CEO salaries continue to skyrocket while the rank and file workers are stuck with less than full time work. Whose fault is this? I'm not sure you can blame the "liberal lemmings" for this one.
Just in case anyone wants to know more about what lemmings really are, consider that they are a small rodent and an integral part of of an arctic ecosystem quickly spiraling out of control. whose fault is that? liberals? conservatives? I would say its all of us. More growth for growth's sake? at this rate there's gonna be and end to it at some point. As a famous man once said - growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell.
We better get together on this one - rationality depends much on perspective and success depends even more on doing more with less and avoiding the finger pointing that is so easy to do.
sprachnroll (Cleveland, OH)
Media bias? No. Just an established fact that financial recessions are always followed by a long slow recovery. But I forgot, Obama is to blame for everything, including the weather.
Jon Bell (Seattle)
Jack,

A 5-7% yearly GDP increase hasn't happened since the end of World War Two.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_economic_expansions_in_the_United_...
Sherr29 (New Jersey)
Trump is an ego-bloated huckster. He's the flim-flam man who has fooled a segment of the public to think that he gives a rat's pitoot about them and their lower middle class problems when he's never faced a middle class problem in his entire life. He's a guy who spent his life gliding on the real estate success of his father cushioned by the millions his father left to the family when he died. Conveniently like so many from the Vietnam Era types who had connections --- he had "bone spurs" that kept him out of the military but allowed him to walk golf courses and go skiing. LOL If he was a poor black kid, his bone spurs wouldn't have stopped him from being in the Army or any other branch of the service. Trump not only insulted vets and military with his comment about McCain, but he also insulted them by comparing his pathetic time in a NY military high school to actually serving in the military. He's a buffoon and I think the man is more than that, I think he has a really serious mental disorder with his petty rages, insults, vulgarity, hateful comments about women, immigrants, etc. He's also a serial marryer of women he considers to be "trophy" wives but who in reality are women looking for an old fool from whom to extract an easy life for putting up with him for a few years in order to cash the big check that they'll either get when they divorce or when he finally kicks off.
It's bizarre that he's the R nominee but then Palin was theirs too.
Bob (Rhode Island)
Old, fat, uneducated white men are so easily manipulated.
Little Hands' base actually thinks the draft dodging divorcer cares about them.
Oh, how delicious.
Reva (New York City)
Ok, so we all know all the bad things. He's horrific and dangerous. And we all have the power not to vote for him, too. So, it would be wonderful if the press stopped running so many enabling stories on him and when they deal with him, demand answers. I am so sick of this Teflon coverage. His blinded followers love it and it makes money for the media. It does nothing for the rest of us.
R. Adelman (Philadelphia)
We ARE tired of Trump stories. But what can we do? Now that he is the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party, we're stuck hearing volumes of stories. Mr. Trump's supporters have proven themselves to be very kind in overlooking the foibles of their chosen leader, so it doesn't matter how thorough a job the Post or the Times does in uncovering his sins, these followers, inexplicably, grow angrier at the press and more affectionate toward their Donald when the press reports on his questionable behavior (an emotional reaction not unexploited by Mr. Trump); in fact, it seems, the more outrageous the lie, the hypocrisy, or the crime committed by the candidate the more firm his base becomes. This phenomenon was once thought to be a strange paradox, but in our present age is is more of a norm... I notice David Brooks gave up, probably in frustration, but I say "Rail on, Press! Rail on, Ms. Collins!" What else can you do?
ACW (New Jersey)
David Brooks, with his 'think pieces', is becoming the cool oasis into which I feel I can plunge after a long trudge through the desert inferno that is the All Trump All The Time media. (The comments strings on his column more than make up for the absence of Trump in the column proper.)
This morning, I opened the other paper I get; the front page is dominated by regional stories (which is why I read it, for state, regional, and local area news, plus the lifestyles and funnies) but the national and international news takes up much or most of the first section. One entire two-page spread was nothing but Trump. One thing you've got to give the man, he does know how to get attention - but then, you can get attention by stripping naked, painting yourself blue, and dancing down the center of the street at high noon. (Except in NYC where they'll just shrug and maybe give you a dollar to take a selfie with you.)
DrD (Earth)
This man is a crazed narcissist. He needs a long lie down and the Republic needs a reformation or a revolution. Either way, the idea that this cheap and vindictive clown of a man will do anything other than obsess about himself is laughable.
Sam (New York)
The Vice Chairman of the Charity the $1M went to is also a Trustee in Trump Towers So Ho. Please conduct due diligence and check if the Charity contributed $1M to Trump's candidacy. Quid Pro Quo.
TheraP (Midwest)
Similar thoughts... Or they could simply have torn up the check!
Fred (Chicago)
What this column sorely needs is an accounting. The money Donald Trump raised at his event were commitments. A commitment is not money in the bank. It is not even a check in the mail in most cases.

Those funds needed to be actually given over by the donors, collected and orderly disbursed to the right organizations, which takes time. The fact that all this hasn't yet been completed is not necessarily news.

Am I a Trump apologist? Hope not. (I'm possibly more weary of those folks' nonsense than of the candidate himself.) And as far as his own funds, that's a different story.

What is needed is clear reporting. Clarity gives a story legs. If the story's tally between what Trump says and what has actually occurred is vague or, in this case absent, that is not news. If Trump says he gave $6 million and the actual number is $5.6 million, that's not really news either. At least not "huge" news. If tell my lunch companion I tipped a waitress $6 (now we're gettin to numbers that are more in my world) when I actually left only $5 and a fair amount of change on the table and she berates me as a liar, I probably won't invite her out again.

In the end, Trump supporters won't change their opinions anyway, but if you want to make a case against the guy, make it stick.
ACJ (Chicago)
This is the man we are going to handover the launch codes to and run our economy. I know what the polls are telling us, but, the more this guy is on stage I can't believe he can win a state.
trueblue (KY)
Maybe he won't in the general election!
bkw (USA)
There's another explanation for Trump's reaction to the veteran controversy. And it's the same exact explanation for all of his other cringe worthy words and reactions. Donald Trump is a psychological mess; a basket case; full of unresolved emotional baggage that has dogged him all of his life. That fact became apparent long ago, especially among those of us in the field of mental health.

One of Trump's favorite statements that for him justifies the insults that spontaneously erupt from his mouth when he feels he's been wronged is "I don't have a choice." And the worst part is he truly believes that. He truly believes he has no choice but to fight back and belittle and make others feel worse than he deep inside feels about himself. And that's regardless who's involved, a judge, the media, competitors and so on. He's like a child who hasn't developed judgement and who doesn't understand consequences.

So the unfortunate fact is, Donald Trump doesn't have a choice. Self awareness and recognizing that he's doing something that needs fixing is necessary for growth and development and change in behavior and maturation. He's just not there. So when we hear Trump proclaim "I don't have a choice," believe him. He's stuck where he developmentally is. And when we vote we must keep that in mind. The reactions and behavior we see coming from him now, is exactly what we will see if he (horrors) claims the presidency and becomes leader of the free world.
TheraP (Midwest)
He may not be stuck where he is.

I'm waiting for the decompensation - when his narcissistic core melts down.
Peter Rant (Bellport)
Reply to "BKW" regarding Trump's mental reasons for striking back so vehemently at his accusers. You make some good points about how he doesn't think about "consequences," like a normal person.

Well, are you leaving out the wealth factor? Like most rich people, he does not live in the same world as most people. He has legions of attorneys on retainer to deal with most "consequences." If he get's someone angry, what really, are the consequences? Virtually none.

The exception to this is people in the media, where the power equation is much more even. A column by Gail Collins is read by a lot of people, and Trump, may think he has been treated unfairly, but there is nothing he can do about it.
George Deitz (California)
It seems more apparent every day that Trump is a certifiable loony. Never mind his puerile fixation on women's body parts and his own. The stubby hands and all.

Never mind his infantile craving for attention. His incessant demand for acknowledgement of how great he thinks he is. He's more like a bratty, drooling, barking dog.

Then he gets attention he doesn't like and he turns into a coiled cobra, tongue out and beady eyes grown beadier. He complains that the "political" media hasn't treated him 'nicely'. After that same media, to its own discredit, lavished free publicity on him nonstop and ignored his opposition. In his "press conference", he looked like a sniveling, emotional runt. His apparent rage made him more reckless than usual.

The worst part of this whole Trump nightmare is not just that the nation is being held hostage by a third-rate vulgarian and his benighted followers but that he just might be our president. The fact that this is possible says volumes about the electorate and the other candidates, and that isn't pretty.

We thought w was bad? Thought Nixon was bad? GHWXYZ Bush was a little dim? We could have our very own Kim Jong Trump, the only difference being that Trump would be elected in the last free election in the history of our country.
LK (CT)
Reading the first 24 comments here, I had to double-check that I wasn't reading the unmoderated comments section of the Washington Post (even though I know that no one as remotely funny as dear Gail writes for WaPo). One person railed on about the "election fraud" this year, evidently referencing the fact that Bernie isn't the presumptive nominee despite being seriously behind in the vote count. Then there's a "progressive/leftists" are idiots ad hominem. And another that uses Trump's veteran donation scandal as a launching pad for yet another screed that Hillary bilked the taxpayers. What?

What gives? Is the Trump nastiness wearing down even the stalwart Gray Lady moderators?
ACW (New Jersey)
Bear in mind that the first few dozen comments you read will largely comprise two groups.
One will be the green-checkbox people, whose comments appear immediately without review by the moderators. Several of these regulars appear. (I rarely read these, as they tend to have a handful of set 'stump speeches' and it gets repetitious.)
The other will be largely non-verifieds who, like the verifieds, live to comment on absolutely everything and get in as soon as a column is made available. A fair subgroup of these, also like the verifieds, have a particular drum they will beat no matter what tune the column is playing. (Over on David Brooks' column, he's talking about almost anything but politics, and the comments usually do not respond at all to the actual matter of his discourse, but launch into the same tired political diatribe as you describe.)
I try to write comments that say something the other 400 or 800 comments may not say. One more voice simply saying, e.g., 'I despise Trump' doesn't add anything.
Lorem Ipsum (DFW, TX)
At least washingtonpost.com has an "Ignore User" button. Really cuts down on the incivility that reaches your screen, provided that you really lean on it. (Any post with the nonword "libs" in it? Ignore YOU, buddy!)

I wonder if The Times has contemplated adding such a feature.
ACW (New Jersey)
Yes, I would love such a button. Not only for 'libs', but also 'banksters' and any cutesy non-witty nicknames for any of the three remaining candidates.
George (Los Angeles)
What I want to see, and I see no reason why, we have the AG of New York, Schneiderman, prosecuting for civil fraud and if that is the case then why has this not been presented to the Grand Jury of New York for criminal fraud and the same in other states. This scam by Trump and associates is criminal fraud and to commit this act crossed state lines and utilized the U.S. Postal Service to commit this act and as a consequence, there are federal violations. So you would think the U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch would open an investigation of Trump and those who participated in this scam and allow the Federal Grand Jury to bring down indictments if mandated by the actions of Trump and associates. The same holds true for the vitamin scam that Trump created after the economic collapse in 2008. Would his vitamins save you from the recession? Same scam, NO.
Independent (the South)
Whatever the legal outcome of the case, it is obvious that the sales tactics were to use an emotional sell to get as much money out of people that they could while delivering a product not as advertised.

Legal, maybe. Moral, no.
Scott Schilling (Houston)
Donald Trump is only interested in the trappings and appearances of wealth and power. He has no actual interest in governing. The real risk is that his underlings and Cabinet will be running the asylum by themselves. After a year or two of avoiding his Presidential responsibilities, flying around in Air Force One, and dodging some possibly fantastic scandals, he may well resign in a huff. And there we will be, with him permanently written into the history books.

Consider thIs well.
JP Williamsburg (Williamsburg, VA)
Air Trump One
Wezilsnout (Indian Lake NY)
Gail and the other sane political commentators need to continue speaking out to counter the incredible amount of manure coming from Trump and his spokespeople and surrogates. It won't change the minds of Trump's supporters any more than "I think there's something in the Cool Ade" would have prevented Jonestown. But it might make some key pockets of voters think twice about their choice, particularly in the battleground states. We must remember that it takes only a one vote majority to win all the electoral votes in each state. So every vote counts. A lot. People in Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and even Texas need to reason with their friends, neighbors and anyone else who will listen. That one vote could prevent another Bush v. Gore.
Jhc (Wynnewood, pa)
Actually two states--Maine and Nebraska--apportion their electoral votes proportionally. Nevertheless, you have a point--to beat Trump we need every eligible voter to turn out.
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
The Democratic Party needs some new blood (as does the Republican Party). If I were a "new blood" Democratic candidate aiming to burst on the scene in the next election (2018), I'm not sure I'd be rooting for a Hillary win.

I recall the 1994 mid-term election very well. Bill Clinton had been in office two years and the Democrats were absolutely crushed. Bill spent the next two years arguing that he was "still relevant" -- a humiliating effort that I considered beneath a President's dignity but one that he made nonetheless. Almost anyone could have beat Bill Clinton in 1996, but the Republican's choice of Bob Dole put the emphasis on "Almost." Bill beat Dole handily, but Gore (wisely, in my view) wanted to have nothing to do with Bill Clinton when he (Gore) ran 4 years later. Frankly, if Bill hadn't become so unpopular by 2000, Gore would have won.

If Trump gets nominated and wins, I anticipate the Republicans will get crushed in the 2018 mid-term, making that a good election for a "new blood" Democrat to run in. Conversely, if Hillary gets nominated and wins, I anticipate that Democrats will get in the 2018 mid-term, just as they did in 1994, two years after Bill Clinton was elected. If so, that would NOT be a good election for a "new blood" Democrat to run in.
Judi F (Lexington)
Keep it up, Gail. I am hoping that Donald Trump totally implodes before November as most narcissists do eventually when their grandiosity and pathological lying is challenged - in this case by the media.
Kristine (Illinois)
Hit the nail on the head Gail. Trump is cheap and/or broke. His commitment to philanthropy and giving is non-existent. And, at 70 years old, he is still arguing over relative peanuts (Trump University $35,000 tuition). Something is rotten in Trump Tower.
jpduffy3 (New York, NY)
It might be more useful to explore why outsiders like Trump and Sanders with all their many faults, are doing so well. There might be something to learn from that. We already know that Ms. Collins does not care much for Trump. So, there is very little to learn from a piece like this, except that Ms. Collins really, really, really does not like Trump.
Jackie (Missouri)
Seems to me that if I had an ego as big as Trump's, I'd be boasting about my many charitable contributions from the highest tower and I'd be writing the checks in front of as many reporters as possible, too. This man is not known for being self-effacing, so maybe he really is all hat and no cattle.
Irate (Computer-User)
There is a subtext here that most people miss: Trump was using veterans to further his campaign! He only donated money when he was accused of holding out. Most people overlook that the veterans were being used.
James T. Lee, MD (Minnesota)
Yet another great knee-slapper from the brain of the delightful Gail Collins. I fell out of my favorite chair laughing and now have a severely injured back. But I digress.

What is known about this "Donald Trump Foundation" into which "six million bucks" apparently moved (back in January approximately)? Two Questions emerge: (1) Is this Foundation a legitimate, tax-exempt charity ? (2) If not, did somebody in Trump's organization actually finagle this huge wad of money for creating a sort of "interest-free loan" to the Trump empire since January ?

Voters need to immediately see the open books to decode this bizarre shenanigans. Donald could of course order that all pertinent information be immediately made public via some third-party, objective accounting firm! One would think that, if he is totally innocent here, the articulate revelation of Certified Truth would be a marvelous event during which DJT could "get back at" the Evil Media and all of its "sleaze" reporters, once and for all. But I smell something rotten.
Welcome (Canada)
Trump is taking the Veterans for a ride and the only reason he is doing it? Previous Donald. What did he do for the Veterans before deciding he needed (his ego!) more attention? I am curious.
Aaron of London (London, UK)
I suspect that this press conference about the veteran donations will be the first of many Trump equivalents of the Wizard of Oz. With Trump when you look behind the curtain there isn't much there there.
marian (Philadelphia)
The only true statement that I know Trump made was when he said, "I love the under-educated". He wasn't kidding.
I get the appeal he has for those who have had a tough time- there are millions who feel that way. But Trump is the opposite of who they should be supporting.
He is against higher minimum wage just for starters. There is nothing about this man that qualifies him to be mayor of Dogpatch- let alone POTUS.

I am continually amazed by people that support Trump. They obviously have no clue what is takes to be the leader of the USA.
I get that the GOP has profoundly let their voter base down and has done so for decades- going back to Reagan.
But, if there was an ounce of dispassionate analysis done, it would be clear that voting for Trump -who is now getting most GOP pols to fall in line behind him like dominoes- is not going to change anything- and in fact, make things so much, much worse.
When his rallies turn violent on a regular basis- just imagine how his presidency would tear this country apart.
Huge red flags come out every day about this con artist.
It is no wonder the GOP has worked very hard to defund education. The so called under-educated that Trump loves so much are in fact the only ones who would ever vote for him and the current crop of GOP pols.
No wonder he loves them.
Clyde (North Carolina)
I'm beginning to think it's true that Trump never expected or wanted to become president and is now subconsciously (or perhaps even consciously) sabotaging his own campaign.
Desmo (Hamilton, OH)
I believe that any male politician who wants to become Commander-in-Chief should have spent some time in the military. There may be exceptions, but they should be rare.
M.D.P. (Butte, Montana)
MSNBC has reported that reservations at Trump properties are down 50% from a year ago world wide. Several Trump promoted projects have been put on hold. The PGA just announced they are moving 'his' golf tournament to Mexico city next year. Maybe the blowhard did have to sell some of his gold plated furniture to come up with the million dollars? Gail might be right on with the $755,000 yearly income estimate. His tax documents must be made public.
Steve Bolger (New York City)
I'd rather pay taxes for government to do what government should be doing than donate to charities to do it.
Dan (New York)
So the Times is moving on from attacking Trump for having sex with beautiful woman (none of whom claimed sexual assault in any way) and is moving on to attacking him for donating to charity? And people wonder why large portions of the country have no faith in the media. Still waiting on that expose of Hillary Clinton's economic czar. I heard that guy has quite a few rape claims against him
sfw (planet mom)
Wow- way to spin it to your own agenda-- btw, his first wife under oath accused him of spousal rape and to date, no one has accused Hillary Clinton of sexual misconduct. And you find it respectable that Trump only donated to Vet's charities when his prior statements about his vet's contributions came up empty? You'd better be a paid Trump commenter because if not, I weep for the future of this country.
Bill (Philadelphia)
Trump was already accused of rape by one of his exes. It's on the record. Maybe you should do some research.
Diana (Centennial, Colorado)
This election makes me feel as though I were in some surrealistic alternate universe. Just when I think surely the latest revelation of Trump's lies, his scamming of students in his "university" or outrageously racist misogynistic or xenophobic remark (take your pick) will turn even ardent supporters away, I am wrong again. He is truly a con artist of the first order. Is there nothing that will reveal the king has no clothes?
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
A great deal is being made of Trump's failure to release his tax returns -- less of Hillary's refusal to release her Wall Street speech transcripts. If I were Trump or Hillary, I'd refuse, but that's not the point here. The point is:

1. Tax returns don't show net worth, only income.

2. One nevertheless can make some confident guesses about net worth based on disclosures of income. Tax returns might make that possible. But so do the financial disclosures required by law to be filed by Presidential candidates. Last week Trump released a 102-page financial disclosure statement, reporting $615,000,000 in income since early 2015, up from $380,000,000 in his year-earlier report. That suggests one of two things, either:

1. An awfully large net worth ($615,000,000 is 6.15% of $10 billion).

OR

2. A very impressive performance on net worth of substantially less than $10 billion.

It matters to me whether a candidate lies -- whether it's Trump or Clinton or Sanders. Maybe Trump has lied about his net worth, but his income disclosures certainly don't suggest that.

Nor has anything Sanders has said suggested that he's lied.

By contrast, some things Hillary has said have suggested she may not have told us the whole truth. One can argue that the subject matter -- her emails -- isn't important. But the subject of an untruth often doesn't matter; it's the mere fact of the untruth that matters.
Independent (the South)
I still admire Trump for questioning Obama's birth certificate.
njglea (Seattle)
DT is a greedy, corrupt crook with inherited and stolen money. Pull the plug and take the air out of him and he is reduced to a puddle of nothing. Such a HUGE ego for such a small-minded man to have to feed.
Bellota (Pittsburgh)
How much more needs to be said or written about the megalomaniac, sociopathic Donald Trump? Most countries would have laughed him off the stage by this time. Unfortunately this man has too many "fellow travelers" in this country. In Hamlet, Marcellus says to Hamlet "something is rotten in the state of Denmark." So the media continue to give this man free publicity and unwarranted attention because it creates readers and viewers. But there are some of us voters who are tired of the obscenity that calls itself Donald Trump.
Mark (Chicago)
Well, I am tired too. Another Trump supporter interviewed on NPR and my head will explode. But like it or not, the attention is no longer "unwarranted." Like it or not, he is the nominee of our major conservative party and is endorsed by an obscene number of the party establishment. The news media, whether you or I like it or not, does have to cover this debacle. There is an election in November, after all. And yes, he is the nominee. We can only hope the media will be ruthless in exposing him now, but that is probably both unlikely (they will mostly normalize him) and probably ineffective with a demagogue's followers.
Tom Linkous (Westerville, Ohio)
Think long and hard about your comments. Italy and France have previously elected similar misogynistic idiots. It's sad to think that it could happen here, but it might.
trueblue (KY)
Oh there is much that is rotten and it's not only Donald.
Brigid McAvey (Westborough, MA)
None of this matters. His followers will vote for him no matter what he says or does (or doesn't do, as this case illustrates). They were bullied or did the bullying in their youth and he makes them feel re-empowered, facts be damned. He and his constituents have enjoyed privilege for so long. The fact of them becoming the minority in our country -- both racially and gender-wise --, feels to them not like equality but like oppression. I hate to tell them that Trump's "wall" won't keep out the folks he and his voters want to keep out. The population of children approaching school-age in America is over 50% minority, maybe not in their neighborhoods but country-wide. Adults who come into America and stay past their visa expiration dates overwhelming arrive by airplane. There's not a wall tall enough to stop a jet. But facts are not relevant to these people or their leader. So scary.
Paul (Phoenix, AZ)
Just for the record, since it comes up a lot about Trump, Bob dole always referred to himself in the third person too.

I think Trump is the dog that caught the car; he is the presumptive nominee, but he doesn't want to be president and that is why he is not taking the advice of his professional campaign staff to look and act more presidential and continues to rant and rave as "the guy with the hat."
Lola (New York City)
Donald Trump's skin is the thickness of tissue paper whenever he feels he is being treated "unfairly"--which is often. On the one hand he wanted his donation to be "confidential but when he was questioned, he said the media should be thanking him for his generosity. It's clear he doesn't have the temperament to serve in any elected office.
PAN (NC)
Trump's tax return is like the curtain the Wizard of Oz hides behind. All his believers may be disappointed when the curtain is finally drawn to reveal the monster fraud behind it.

Or, more likely, his supporters are all disgruntled down and out in a multicultural society and want to bring the rest of the country down too; and supporting Trump is a sure way to do this - why should they be the only aggrieved in this country?
Suzy Sandor (Manhattan)
Go ahead Trump do whatever to divide the republican party it is the only good thing to come out in this election since proportional representation and third party are offensive and too complicated for America still today.
Amelie (Northern California)
Liars never want reporters to ask them questions -- except when they're trying to spin, dissemble and lie their way into new layers of fiction.

I actually think that with his lies, Trump is brilliant at stoking the resentments of the segment of the American public that the blowhard loony right, on Fox News and on the radio, has carefully created for years. They don't like the media, or so they say while lapping up whatever Fox News says. They don't like the government -- that's what they learned from Reagan and his ilk. They're tired of "political correctness" -- which means, I suppose, not being able to tag minorities and women with pejorative labels. Trump speaks to them, and they love his lies.
Steven (Marfa, TX)
In an attempt to see this from the other side:

1. Trump supporters are anti-government because, raised on the anti communist, right-wing propaganda that has informed all our teachings about history and "democracy," even in public schools, they have been trained to see Federalism as creeping Stalinism, and States' Rights -- a cover for another facet of conservatism, firmly founded in racism -- as Freedom.

2. Trump supporters are anti-media because, similarly, they have been educated to believe that the cosmopolitan, urban world view of the big city is a fundamental threat to the agrarian world view that characterized America before the 20th century began. No surprise here that media paranoia is strongest in the White South, and other non-urbanized parts of the US. HB2 is just the latest symptom of this split.

3. Finally, Trump supporters are anti-Union and anti-Social Safety Net, health care in particular, because they've been trained to believe in the myth of individualism, the self-made (white) man, the entrepreneur who creates value out of nothing, and that everything that attempts to compensate for the extensive social damage perpetuated by this fantasy is evil, and anathema to The American Way.

The world Trump supporters were educated to believe in is dead and gone, if it ever really existed in the first place.

Trump ain't bringin' it back, but his supporters continue to have such sad, false, twisted hope, and not their fault, really. They were sold a pack of lies.
Bill (Wheeling, WV)
Finally the press is getting its act together and has begun peeling the layers off of this fraud. Soon we will all know that the wannabe emperor wears no clothes. And finally we will find out that Marco was correct. The Donald does have a problem "down there."
Didi (Thomasville)
He is cheap - when purchasing a great deal of very inexpensive reproduction furniture for Mar-A- Lago he paid the businesses owner over 120 days late consistently causing financial hardship for business.
georgiadem (Atlanta)
Please let's not forget that another past presidential hopeful also served when he could have gotten a deferment, John Kerry. He served his country in battle and then was subjected to the GOP lie machine, thus creating a new way to describe media spinning, "Swift Boating". This term is now in full use to describe how someone can be denigrated without a modicum of truth to the allegations. Even the groups who started it all, The GOP, use it to describe themselves when needed.

The last president to refer to himself in the third person, Nixon, also gave us the other infamous scandal "Watergate", providing the media a way to name scandals "Choose whatever Gate" for perpetuity.
Dikoma C Shungu (New York City)
Trump got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and, embarrassed, he lashed out at the media for doing their job. That press conference was a preview of what a press conference with President Trump would be like and the prospect has had the tonic effect that the media needed to, at long last, begin holding Trump accountable.

I predict that this is the turning of the tide against "Teflon Don"....
John (Stowe, PA)
Guessing trump thought he would be able to steal this cash, just like he stole from contractors, investors, students, and workers in his past ventures.

Glad to see some serious reporting on Clinton for a change with her starting the general election push to out trump as a fraud, and the serious coverage of trump as a fraud.
NM (NY)
Trump's appreciation of the service is so shallow, he said that avoiding STDs was his own Vietnam.
Trump's appreciation of the service is so shallow, he says he loves the veterans the way he says he loves the un-educated.
Trump's appreciation of the service is so shallow, he should never be Commander-in-chief.
CFM (Brattleboro, Vt.)
As a combat wounded veteran who served honorably for a year in Vietnam,
Monette is sadly disappointed in our two major candidates. Donald's, "We're going to take care of our veterans" wears thin. Seems Trump likes to wrap the flag around himself (surprise, surprise) in some kind of macho allegiance and solidarity with warriors. Please don't patronize those of us who served nor denigrate the sacrifice, courage and integrity of John McCain, Mister Trump.
I hardly ever hear of Hillary speak of veterans, their struggles their issues. She's as much of a phony and liar as the Donald.
Bernie Sanders didn't serve, but he's had our back here in Vermont and in Congress. Through his initiatives, there are satellite healthcare centers throughout Vermont. He and the folks in his office have steadfastly helped veterans receive their benefits and access to healthcare. I know that for a fact, because he helped me. Bernie also worked with John McCain to pass the most comprehensive healthcare legislation for veterans. Yes, across the aisle. John McCain, a polar opposite politically, said "I like Bernie... he's a fighter." He didn't get all he wanted in the bill, but the compromise was vastly better than what we had.
Look at their records. Bernie is the only one who has fought to improve the lives of veterans. He'd do the same for all of the American people if elected.
Charles Monette Sgt. E-5, 1st Air Cavalry Division. Vietnam 1970-71
George S. (Michigan)
There is a lot of confusion on the $6 million donated to vets. Just to clear things up, Don donated 60,000 rounds of golf worth $6 million. Carts included.
Alexander (Columbia, SC)
Gail, thanks for repeatedly finding a little humor in what is the truly sad spectacle of Trump's presidential campaign. We remain hopeful and confident that come November there will be vindication and he will get trounced in the general election. In the meantime all the Trump ridicule you can dish out is music to our ears.
Frank (Houston)
Gail - As always I enjoy your column, but isn't it hard to find any humor in this pathetic situation? A patent liar and boast being lionized by the resentful and underemployed? His audience mindset must resemble closely that of attendees at a bear-bating spectacle - angry, mindless and motivated only by hurting other things and people.
Edie clark (Austin, Texas)
This whole thing has been sketchy from the start. Trump's reason for doing a fundraiser to spite Fox News. Far from being private, it was staged for television- with the U.S.S. Iowa, a decommissioned battleship as the backdrop. At the event, in addition to announcing that he had raised $6 million, and that he had given $1 million, Trump announced that he had been endorsed by Veterans for a Strong America, which, instead of a veterans organization with hundreds of thousands of members, turned out to be one guy named Joel from South Dakota.

Remind me again who really is "a sleaze"?

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/16/rachel_maddow_reveals_donald_trumps_sket...
ANH Le (Denver Co)
This article is making the author look very bad. They are calling a man who donated 1 million dollars, a tight wad. I am a business owner and I also make large contributions for non profit causes. It is a good thing, but if someone calls me a tight wad, when I am giving large amounts of money away, is a very poor stance.

It reveals some things about this author: 1) they are corrupt media, and they are trying to convince people that doing a good thing (since doing it later) is really a bad an evil thing.
2). The author is completely judging as if they are an individual who has actually given 1 million dollars to a non-profit organization. If so, why are you judging, and if not, then you really shouldn't be speaking. Maybe the tightwad really is the writer.
3). How much has the other candidates contributed to the veterans, personally? I would love for that to be reported. So that reveals that this is biased, and is totally just equal to reading the tabloids. The writer is obviously on the democratic side, and is looking for anything to attack the republicans. And it really is a low attack.

So, this teaches me a lot of things, do not judge, lest you be judged. If you judge, judge correctly, otherwise you are liable to look like a fool.
Kay Johnson (Colorado)
But the broader context was the refusing of a debate on Fox and making a big show of giving to our veterans and then not doing it until he got outed by the press.
We can also be taught to gather all the facts and to Consider the Source.
Eliza Brewster (N.E. Pa.)
Listening to the Trump's news conference the other day my first thought was this guy is truly pathetic. Insulting the press is hardly the way to weasel out of an embarrassing situation entirely of his own making.
As the months go by I think it will become obvious, even to his most devoted fans, that here is a weak man trapped in his own lies.
Nancy Parker (Englewood, FL)
Can you imagine JFK referring to himself as Kennedy in a speech, or Barack Obama as Obama will do or sign such and such? Unthinkable?

Martin Luther King as "King"?

Why is it Republicans - Nixon and Trump - who do so, and we take it as a given?

Why do they see themselves so differently. Not as a leader of a cause or movement, but as the cause or movement themselves.

The end all and be all of the adulation of the people, not the issues they stand for, not the direction in which they hope to lead, not the vision they have for the nation, but the cult of their own personality.

And anyone who points out the flaws in that personality - Tricky Dick or Slimy Donald - assails the whole delicate facade, built on the cult of the individual.

They are seen as the enemy not of the person - but of the people.
Sajwert (NH)
I was quietly reading your column, drinking my tea when this part came in sight.
“Because I wanted to make this out of the goodness of my heart,” he told a press conference in which he castigated reporters for forcing him to provide details.

Of all conceivable explanations, “too self-effacing” ranks somewhere below “temporarily kidnapped by space aliens.”

The tea is now all over the monitor and I can't stop laughing. You have made my day so much brighter - and, yes, my monitor a mess.
Dave (Yucca Valley, Calif)
The PGA has pulled its golf tournament from Trump's Florida property to Mexico City. Trump is disintegrating before our eyes. He was almost foaming at the mouth during his performance yesterday at an aircraft hanger in California. The likelihood he can achieve a majority in a national election is essentially nil.
Martin Fass (Rochester, NY)
Here's hoping your readers will join me in volunteering to get out the vote (GOTV) for Hillary Clinton. This can be done by making phone calls from the comfort of one's home, but not for the comfort of one's ear when there is a great deal of venom forthcoming if one should speak to a Trump or a Sanders fan. That's a way to remind us how much ugliness is being injected into our society and the world each day this year. In short, volunteer.
Nancy (Corinth, Kentucky)
Wish the Times would assign someone to a focus group of Trump supporters. Then when there's a campaign development, the reporter could call them all and ask if (pick an issue) affects their support, how and why.
For example, last year I mentioned the four bankruptcies to my own personal Trump Supporter focus group, the guys at the shop where I get my truck worked on. (Can't afford to ignore or antagonize them, understand)after one of them opined that we need "a successful businessman running the country."
The general reaction was, "Yeah, four bankruptcies and he's still rich!"
To, "Well, we read that he's not as wealthy as he claims," it was, "I wouldn't turn down $100 million!"
And his early surge in the polls? clearly, inarguably and unassailably by any later statements or revelations, the fact that (faithful reality-TV fans to a man) someone was running for president whom they had heard of.
Patrick B (Chicago)
Yes, I fear a Trump presidency.

But my greater fear is the American voters who are falling for con-man Trump, hook, line and sinker.

Are we so desperate for change that we are willing to put a thin skinned narcissist in charge of the worlds most powerful military?

We will find out in November.
G (Iowa)
Pathological liar, narcissist. This is his game plan. If Trump is President drama like this will cloud DC every moment every day.

Trump lies to bring attention to himself as 'the big man'. Then more lies to cover up the initial lies. Intimidation and insults to those who try to disentangle the multiple lies.

The Presidency is the ultimate narcissistic achievement. Ask Mussolini.
Bayou Houma (Houma, Louisiana)
Sure, Trump's donation of a million dollars to veteran charities reeks of political self-serving. But it was a substantial gift exceptionally generous. So how much money has the Clinton Global Initiative Foundation contributed to our Veterans' charities? How much money has either Hillary or Bill Clinton personally donated to the charities?
Kay Johnson (Colorado)
Well buying your way out of a Fox debate is also a self-serving act as is not paying up until you got goaded.
dog girl (nyc)
Am I the only person who sees Trump's insecurity area?

Talk about he has no money.
Talk about he gives no charity.
Talk about his products are not good and made in China.
Talk about his pays his staff peanuts.

He gets so angry about financial stuff (cause it is his sore point) and because it is his identity, that if the media keep harboring on it, eventually, he will come undone way before November.

He gets extremely unstable when it comes money. And this is the reason he is not releasing his taxes, even though, I am very sure wikileaks will before November.
Benoit Comeau (Ottawa)
The closer we get to the moment when the electorate chooses, the more we learn about the candidates and their long list of flaws. Though somewhat discombobulating for a Canadian on the sidelines, it sure makes for lurid, fascinating reading. Judging from the commentaries, it will come down to a choice between the evil of two lessers. Gawd help America (and its neighbours) if Trump wins.
Thomas MacMillan (Locust, NC)
Fine analysis-as usual. However, I feel you insult the memory of Richard Nixon by connecting him with The Fraud-Trump. Nixon, most assuredly, had his flaws - but he was eminently qualified to be President. In, many respects, he did a commendable job. He is the only Republican to get my vote for President- in 1972. The Fraud, Trump, is in no way shape or form qualified to hold elected office- at the lowest level, let alone at the highest.
LVG (Atlanta)
Excellent retort by Gail to madman Trump's tantrum blaming the media for exposing another example of his boldface lies and fraud. Comparison to Nixon is obvious- similar mental imbalance and infantile desire for revenge. Comparisons to Adolf's rise to power are more significant. It just takes one major terrorist act or international blowup with Russia or North Korea and fascism will be established as the new American Order under Herr Trump. Trump will make US wunderbar again with false promises and lies. That's how Hitler gave Volkswagen its start.
J.R. (NM)
No matter what we post, as citizens we know that the choices for president in 2016 are pathetic. Do we want a blowhard, narcissistic, pathological liar that can't be trusted to ever tell the truth, or do we want a blowhard, narcissistic, pathological liar that can't be trusted to ever tell the truth? Whichever candidate we vote for, it bears a similarity to foraging through a dumpster for a nutritious meal, knowing all along we will come up short because it was, after all, the dumpster outside of McDonald's.
Abel Fernandez (NM)
Trump is not thin skinned, he is a classic narcissist. He makes a major public show of raising money for veterans but then tells us he did not want publicity at all, that he wanted to quietly give money to vets out of his profound gratitude to them for their service. He must be loved, he must be admired. If not, he turns vicious. The man has a personality disorder that will lead this country and the world into absolute turmoil if he is elected President of the United States.
Elliott Jacobson (Claymont, DE)
The problem isn't Donald Trump but the campaign of Hillary Clinton and its inablity to capture the attention of the American people or even the media while successfully meeting the Trump challenge. What is amazing is that Hillary's well funded campaign populated by pollsters, targeting experts, media consultants, organizers, handlers, advisers, script writers etc. is going up against a candidate whose main assets are his incomprehensible self, his gut and his Twitter account. He does have a token "pro" in Paul Manafort but after a few attempts at being "Presidential" Trump is back to being Trump. More in another comment.
Trakker (Maryland)
At what point will we realize the more we criticize, demonize, and laugh at Donald Trump, the more his supporters love him. To them his wealth allows him to give the finger to everyone and everything they hate, and their hate is deep, and inflamed daily by Trump.

He will lose, of course, but he won't go meekly and his supporters, most of whom appear certain he will win, will not accept defeat well, for Trump is their last hope for a return to the America of their past.

I suspect Trump will not go away but will continue to travel the country, fanning the flames of hatred of Hillary and the government, and bask in their adoration. He speaks their language and understands the buttons they want pushed. Many of them will be primed for a fight, feeling they have almost nothing left to lose.

We may laugh at Trump but the next President must immediately reach out to his supporters and listen to their grievances and engage them in a dialogue. Many of their fears are real, others are created by Fox News and others who have sought to exploit them for audience ratings and their votes.
TheraP (Midwest)
This may not affect his supporters.

But it Will affect the narcotic of narcissism that fuels his puny ego. And the meltdown of narcissism will expose his lunacy. It won't be pretty. But it will be effective.

So bring on the reporting of every dirty deed and every sorry lawsuit - till the meltdown comes. I'm betting on autumn for the Fall!
Pat (Colorado)
A couple of questions are in order here, but no one seems willing to ask them out loud or in print:

1. What is the protocol and who takes charge if a President of the United States has proven himself to be sufficiently ignorant or sufficiently indiscreet to be granted a security clearance?

2. What is the protocol and who takes charge if a President of the United States is sufficiently out of control that psychiatric hospitalization may be the only good alternative?
Mark (Chicago)
The 25th Amendment to the Constitution: "Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."

President Chris Christie anyone?
MyThreeCents (San Francisco)
From the article:

"Unless he’s not a billionaire at all. If Trump ever releases his tax records and it turns out that he’s only worth, say, $755,000..."

Well, if he ever releases concrete information on his net worth (tax returns don'ts show that), I'll be mightily impressed that he managed to eke out $615,000,000 in income since early 2015 from a net worth of only $755,000, as reported in the 102-page financial disclosure he released last week (up from a mere $380 million the year before).
Lynda (Gulfport, FL)
The only aspect of this Trump debacle keeping me sane is the hope that all the Republicans who have so quickly lined up to support his candidacy are secretly counting on Sec. Clinton to win. They will be able to say they were good soldiers in supporting the nominee their flawed primary system and base baiting tactics produced without actually endangering the USA with a Trump presidency. Failing an outright Clinton win, perhaps a few of the electoral college voters will have the courage to say "No" to a Trump presidency. I remember how quickly Spiro Agnew disappeared when his chances of becoming President appeared likely! Those Republicans have drawn a line about just who they will allow to be president.

I guess a great move for the Democratic party would be to run a 24/7 channel of Trump's news conferences, speeches and tweets. After the novelty wears off, maybe his voters will pick up on his multiple frauds.
TheraP (Midwest)
Don Juan Channel. Has a ring to it!
Londoner (London, England)
NBC's Katie Tur tweeted out that Trump's dyspeptic performance at that press conference could mark a turning point in the relationship between him and the press.

Let's hope so. The person who have that performance is in no way fit to be representing the United States in an any international forum (to say nothing of where his temperament will lead him domestically).

I say this as a Bernie supporter who has indulged a certain "worse it is the better it is" realpolitik. But Trump's total unfitness for office is just too glaring now.
Jack Nargundkar (Germantown, MD)
“If Trump ever releases his tax records…”

Given the brouhaha over the $6 million ($4.6 million, whatever) that Trump raised for veterans and did not distribute until the Washington Post called him on it, it’s now almost a given that charity is not a highlight of his past tax returns.

Given the Trump U. discovery documents exposé that show Trump’s modus operandi was to hit up vulnerable people for their hard-earned money, we might just learn that “he’s not a billionaire at all.”

Given that Trump has a penchant for making an outrageous claim and then dial it back later by saying “he was just joking,” we must all pray that he is serious about his bellwether prediction to “make America great again.”

But charity begins at home, so maybe if Trump ever gets around to releasing his tax records, we will know for sure whether that greatness has any basis in fact.
tacitus0 (Houston, Texas)
Facts:
1) Trump bragged in January that he raised 6 million dollars for veterans. He still hasn't reached that mark.
2) Trump's own donation of 1 million dollars was not made until one week after he started getting bad press for not following through on his promises
3) Though claiming he didnt want to brag about giving the money, he has done nothing but brag about it starting with his inaccurate statement during his fund raiser in January.
4) And here is exactly what he is bragging about.
If Trump is really worth $10 billion (as he claims) the $1 million he donated is 1% of 1% of his wealth.
The math: 10 billion divided by 100 (1%) = 100 million
100 million divided by 100 (1%) - 1 million
So, 1% of 1%
Wealth wise this is the equivalent to a person who makes $150,000 donating $15 dollars a year and bragging about how generous they are.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the veterans need and appreciate the money. But to brag about giving away such a small percentage of your wealth to a cause you claim is so important, to lambast the press for not recognizing what a good thing you were doing, to act as though you have a long history of supporting vets and vet causes for your own political purposes when we are talking about a donation of 1% of 1% is even more ridiculous than normal for Trump.
Glengarry (USA)
This is great. Watch the press continue to tickle the Trumpster till he explodes. Nothing more needs to be done. Out of the private sector and into the big time with the big lights where all is exposed. He will rue the day he thought running for president was a good idea.
Howsrd Marcus (Boston)
If Trump were smart, which he is not, he would have announced a month ago, that after meetings with his financial people and his family, he has decided that he can no longer continue his campaign because to become president, will not allow him to control his financial empire as he would like to do, but he hopes that the issues that he has raised will be taken up by others.
In this way, since he has nothing more to say, he could continue to act like a king and might avoid much of the negative, insightful articles that are starting to finally come out about him---much beyond the fact that we already recognize that he has donated nothing to real charities over the years, pays virtually no income tax, is worth a fraction of what he claims, and either is sued by or sues most everyone with whom he comes in contact.
He clearly is going to implode with so many months still remaining. My other thought is that he really is doing all of this on purpose to guarantee a Democratic sweep.
Kay Johnson (Colorado)
Trumpy McDeferrment couldn't even remember which foot was his Golden Ticket out of VietNam. The press is finally is onto him about promising donations to vets and his curious amnesia when the cameras are off. i.e.: "Oh, THAT".

One NPR interviewer asked a supporter at that biker rally about the McCain diss and the guy ( at a POW rally no less) said "Trump is just saying whatever it takes to get elected". Connecting Trump's actual words to actual meaning = "Too PC"

Now Trump thinks he is MLK only minus the crowds. He refers to himself in third person and has the support of the dictator from North Korea who probably recognizes a fellow hair fetisher. He is a germaphobe who talks of "punishing women". Why doesnt Reince Preibus just run a TV cartoon as their candidate.
Alan Chaprack (The Fabulous Upper West Side)
Here's an idea for a campaign button: "Nixon was the one; Trump's a bigger one."

You hadda be there.
R (Kansas)
The Nixon/Trump last paragraph comparison has always been worthy given the fact that both have used the silent majority to fuel their rise. Trump is a disgrace!
Michael Thomas (Sawyer, MI)
When is someone, anyone, going to write a column focusing on the millions of supporters Trump has?
This isn't about Trump. It has never been about Trump.
How is it that roughly half of the population does not see this farce for what it is?
How did we arrive at such a low point on the bell curve plotting intellect, reason?
'We're Number One', indeed.
UH (NJ)
The gall of Gail to defame tricky Dick. Who's next? Checkers?
J Burkett (Austin, TX)
Absolutely, Trump is a comic. During his $$ For Vets presser this week, he fired off one zinger after another. I dang near fell on the floor when he delivered his very best joke: "I'm a very honest person". I mean, c'mon, Gail, is that a knee-slapper, or what?

On a far more serious note, remember this. For his entire adult life, Donald Trump has worked for Donald Trump. Over the past 4 decades, he has had to answer to no one but the man in the mirror. What he revealed on Tuesday is that he cannot tolerate to have his actions or his motives be questioned. It's totally foreign to him.

Which is why, should he win in November, I'll give him, at most, 18 months before he packs up and returns to his gilded cage. Where he, and only he, calls every shot.
TheraP (Midwest)
Your column prompt the question: Why is Don Juan suddenly so interested in the military?

Several thoughts come to mind. I seem to recall him telling us that he likes the uneducated. And what do many uneducated white males do? Yes, they join the military. Also, recently DT has evinced an interest in guns. According to the 2nd amendment, bearing arms is part of a well-regulated militia - which I take to be the military. Then there's that little fact about wanting to be president - something that many children are told they can do "when they grow up." DT hasn't yet grown up, but still he's bullied and whined his way to a convention - which many corporations are now shunning due to this DT Kid wanting to be president.

So we put all those thoughts together. Along with Don Juan being a tightwad. And that equals this column: The story of a naughty preschooler, playing with guns and toy soldiers, who's too selfish to share! And wants to be president NOW - even though he's not grown up enough.
BigGuy (Forest Hills)
Nixon most often referred to himself in the third person when he was writing things down. He wanted to remove his ego from his decision making. No "I" on the paper might make him more objective.

In contrast, Trump refers to himself in the third person to assuage his ego.
Kelli L (Spring, Texas)
So Nixon didn't have an ego?
This Is A Very Insightful Article. .wished I Had Read This Before The Primaries. Guess Some dems Do Have Differing Views.. (Sandi Dear Texas)
I own a small tax preparer service for 37 years..I polled my clients and families informally this year..the results truly have to be multiplied through the states I would think..but at least 46 per cent were totally against Trump..the percentage for him was one woman who works as a housekeeper and several men who are early 40s. No older people..none..majority of base is republican..the press gave him too much free time..he played them..they should just hang up the phone every network or give him to your recording for added info it wouldn't take long for him to be apoplectic...I believe he is broke and this is a scam and con...the biggest one of a lifetime..how blind can people be..others much more insightful than I must see it..it's so apparent...
Tom Connor (Chicopee)
Trump's candidacy will collapse at the convention. Let's hope that the convention of political civility hasn't completely collapsed with his candidacy.
Tonybritt (Sarasota)
He's all yours america....unless you cast a proper vote in November.....
Geoffrey James (toronto, canada)
I have been fed so much Trump by the media that I am starting to feel like a goose whose liver is going to be valuable one day. But, in spite of this glut, there is always a little room for another morsel from Ms Collins. Thank you, Gail
Bernard B (PBG Florida)
The money he supposedly sent for Veterans went instead to Melanias shoe closet. Then the Washington Post started asking questions. When he said he didn't want to have credit for it he was talking about her shoes.
Susan (Paris)
" Oh, I'm totally accountable, but I didn't want to take credit for it," Trump said.

Trump is indisputably the least "self effacing," most credit grabbing, publicity hound this country has ever produced. As far as "accountability" is concerned, let's see him step up to the plate for all the people he ripped off at "Trump University."
ldkj (NY, NY)
It didn't make me feel better, Gail, but it did make me laugh.
C Kubly (Madison, WI)
Good piece Gail. If only the Trump voters listened to the truth. Still doesn't seem to matter what he says or does.
steve (florida)
He was vetting the charities before he just handed over the money. Right. I am trying to imagine what it must be like inside his head, his perpetual state of affronted.
The only thing I can think of is that he is just a very small man, in every regard except belicosity.
David Parsons (San Francisco)
Trump was the first candidate in history to announce his run for the president by announcing his net worth.

He bragged he was worth $10 billion as proof of his amazing success.

He claimed he would self-fund his campaign, because he didn't want to be bought like so many other politicians.

A lot of gullible people were impressed, even though he has a long public history of making extraordinary claims of being the greatest, the best, the most tremendous, all evidence of financial disasters to the contrary.

He laughed that he could shoot someone and his supporters wouldn't care. He loves the uneducated he said on another occasion, some of his best supporters.

Then he renounced his pledge to self-fund his campaign.

Then he said he wouldn't release his tax returns and his tax rate is none of our business.

Then he boasts of making contributions to veterans for a political prop, even though if his stated net worth is correct, he gave just 0.01%.

That is like the median family giving about $17.11 to the veterans from their net worth and holding a news conference expecting public adulation of generosity.

Truly, Trump University is Donald Trump's lessons in life for duping rubes for personal profit and not feeling bad about it.
b. (usa)
Gail, you're confused. Donald Trump is the ONE!

Our National Embarrassment.
David. (Philadelphia)
To be fair to those who refer to themselves in the third person, Bernie Sanders does so frequently.
Rea Tarr (Malone, NY)
Why should we be fair to those who refer to themselves in the third person? Is it because we should be kind to the mentally challenged?
ch (Indiana)
To put Donald Trump aside for a minute and focus on veterans, we as a nation seemingly don't really care about veterans. Ribbons and parades and wreaths and thank you proclamations are fine, but what veterans really want is access to medical care (mental and physical), job training, education, and jobs. Yet we fill Congress with people who tell us that tax cuts are more important than adequately funding veterans' services. We say through our elected representatives that having the newest igadget or a few extra restaurant meals is more important to us than veterans' access to medical care and other services.

As other commenters have said, Donald Trump is a symptom. We should stop focusing so much venom on him and look at ourselves.
Gabbyboy (Colorado)
It's not complicated, Dumpster is a sociopath, it explains everything about him and his followers. The symptoms will only get worse as the election season wears on. The media, the press, whoever, needs to quit feeding the beast.
just Robert (Colorado)
In times past we refused to vote for a man who made a few secret off hand remarks to his rich cronies about the 47 percent. Now we have a candidate who makes so many outrageous comments right out in the open and it seems that the public just shrugs and mumbles business as usual. What has happened to any sense of decency or was it just a mask for our low entertainment society.
Tourist (upstate New York)
At least that is what the media portrays. I choose to believe that the decent folk are not being covered by much of the media in their reactions to Trump.
Jim (Demers)
The Donald is not accustomed to having the truth come out. Until now, nobody had reason to spend time and money exposing his fabrications and confabulations. Spackling and painting his reputation was an easy task for his lawyers. (Top lawyers!) Republicans should think on this: the press is just getting started, and there's more - much more - to come.
Carolson (Richmond VA)
Contrary to the majority of the comments here, I'm actually feeling better about all of this. I'm now convinced that no one will have to come up with "strategy" against Trump: he will dig his own grave. As the pressure increases, he will lash out more frequently. After the convention, when the Clinton campaign unleashes its deluge of anti-Trump ads, the media will finally pay attention. Why? Because it will be entertaining!
TheraP (Midwest)
Yup, I agree. The buckets of daily dirt dug up on the Don will have its effect. He is being destabilized by his inability to deal with all the dirt - that he thought he'd buried. But is not forgotten.

I suspect it's just a matter of time. Before he decompensates. In a pile of dirt.

Bring on the dirt!
Phil M (Jersey)
It is the job of the fourth estate to keep grilling Trump about everything he says. I truly believe that the result of serious questioning will eventually lead Trump to start babbling incoherently. Then the comedians and news outlets will provide even more free publicity and make him stronger. Social media will have a field day trying to interpret Trump's thoughts. What entertainment that will bring. After all, this election is about being entertained. We need to consult science fiction writers to come up with a strategy for destroying this entity before it destroys us.
Bill (Ithaca, NY)
Trump already is babbling incoherently. Unfortunately, his supporters just eat it up.
lizmarks (lala)
What's amazing is no one has picked up on the 'coincidence' of the day Trump announces his wonderful awards to various Veteran groups, is the same day of the release of the Trump University depositions declining how Trump University employees were directed to get people signed up to the 'courses' whether they could afford them or not. They took advantage of the disabled, ignorant and those who had trouble making ends meet. Don't you think Trump's timing of his Veterans donations is to assuage the impact of his scam university!!
If Hillary is smart, she will follow up with testimony from the thousands of people and small businesses who were impacted by. Trump's various bankruptcies and the small business which were forced to renegotiate their original contracts after the work was already done in order to avoid having to pay legal fees to defend themselves.
Persuasion of Trump is very effective to masses of people but once Manipulation is know; the end of the Trump phenomena will result. It is up to the media and the Dems to make sure the electorate knows how Trump,the businessman, operated.
Syltherapy (Pennsylvania)
I don't think people are tired of reporting on Trump. In fact we need much more reporting on his business practices, past statements, policy positions or lack there of, treatment of women and minorities, finances, financial backers, etc. What we don't need is more horse race coverage. Perhaps now that the Republican primaries are now over, the press will finally give us just that.
souriad (NJ)
I agree with Trump that the first amendment is outmoded. The first amendment permits the press to crticize leaders and candidates, including Trump. This is unacceptable. we need to replace the first amendment with something updated for our times.

Congress shall make laws respecting an establishment of religion (especially evangelical christianity), and prohibiting the free exercise thereof; and abridging the freedom of speech, and especially of the press; and the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Citizens whose opinions are contrary to the governments's interest shall be subject to arrest and summary execution without trial.
Fourteen (Boston)
Everyone has been piling on the Trumpster recently. As the Chairman and President of a privately held corporation he can't be used to such back-talk. He's getting it from all sides and seems to be stunned and a bit confused.

Am thinking he hasn't much left, nothing new to say, and no way to escape or adapt to his escalating situation. This poor guy's ego is built on the transparent lie that he's some great real estate tycoon, a master of the universe, a New Yorker! But people are now freely questioning his bluster and calling him out. There is desperation in the way he swats and flails. Can he go the distance?

People are starting to see him for what he truly is - the world's biggest loser. If he stumbles on without his ego imploding, there is a real street fighter he has yet to face.

When the time is right, and the Progressive platform secured, Sanders will pivot and knock the Trumpster out. This will instantly put millions of cheering Progressive Independents square against the Trumpster and win the election for Clinton.
Kayleigh73 (Raleigh)
But your hero Bernie isn't running as Progressive Independent — he has decided that he's a Democrat and is turning almost as nasty as Trump in berating Hillary.
nzierler (New Hartford)
Kudos to Paul Ryan who has so far refused to drink the Trump Kool-Aid. Trump is coming apart at the seams, not unexpected, and he is the major detriment to any Republican running for re-election or seeking election this fall. In reference to Collins' calling out Trump as a tightwad, let's add stingy to the host of adjectives fitting Trump: megalomaniacal, fraudulent, mean-spirited, vindictive, juvenile, delusional, volcanic, obnoxious. Regardless of what mindless things he utters or does until the election, he will have his steadfast supporters but it is becoming quite clear that voters know this is not a person qualified to hold the world's most powerful and prestigious position.
jprfrog (New York NY)
In re Trump's actual net worth: i have been wondering for some time why a supposed multi-billionaire would hawk setaks and phony real estate seminars for what amounts to pocket change or a rounding error. I have suspected that it was for the pleasure of ripping off the rubes who bought his shtick --- certainly he has such a broad streak of gratuitous cruelty that such a "disgusting" motive would not be out of the question.

But today's comments suggest another (although not mutually exclusive) reason: he needs the money. In short, he is (relatively speaking) broke. Since we know that his relation to truth is tenuous, to be undeservedly generous, this too is entirely plausible.

It is a terrible reflection on the state of our public life that such a person be anything but a figure of mockery and derision, let alone within reach of the US nuclear codes.
Douglas Curran (Victoria, B.C.)
Orwell wrote, "All issues are political issues and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia." He also penned, "Political thought is a sort of masturbation fantasy...the world of facts hardly matters."

Those two brief observation nicely encapsulate the reality and psychology of Trump. Contrasting that we have the people who see themselves as the very core fabric of the United States, willingly and blithely embracing his lies, facetious pandering and exploitation of their most traumatic experiences, as evidenced by his sudden fondness for veterans - although apparently not if you had the misfortune to be held for years as a POW.
Seen together, the two segments present a vision of collective psychosis, a profound distaste for unalloyed fact in preference for fantasy, fairy tales. and hunting for witches to burn.
Saddle Sore (Hitching Post, Blue Country)
Gail, I think what's not being focused upon with Trump and the veteran donations is Trump's violation of charitable fundraising laws. Typically, each state requires that every person or entity that solicits, collects and disburses charitable donations, is under an affirmative obligation to report to the state Attorney General complete statements of account and to comply with state law on the use of segregated escrow accounts for donation monies, etc.

Attorney General Schneiderman; where ar't thou?
Mary (NY)
No one ever questioned Trump's assertions: successful businessman, worth XM, etc. And when questioned, he attacks with personal remarks. Ethics? Integrity? Code of conduct? By the way, he chose that particular veterans organization because he knew the leaders (regardless of his excuse of vetting the charities). He could have chosen a more direct services veterans charity where his money would be more effective but this was convenient.
Bounarotti (Boston. MA)
Does any thinking person really believe that the country that elected Barak Obama 4 years ago is going to elect Trump now? That would require a seismic shift of the body politic for which there is absolutely no evidence.
Obama was the voting public's validation of our belief in the content of our elected officials' character over the color of their skin; of substance over the superficial. Trump's election would be the antithesis. It beggars believe that in four short years we could, as a country, reverse ourselves so radically.
That Trump represents some Americans is undeniable. That there are Americans for whom the lowest common denominator is comfortable ground should come as no surprise - I have one word for you, "Kardashian." That many Americans are frustrated by government's unwillingness to act in the best interests of the vast majority of its citizens is strong and growing, perhaps dangerously; the system is rigged for the rich and politicians are ever more obviously bought like cheap trinkets. So, yes, The Short-Fingered Vulgarian has tapped into a strain of frustrated, angry people who want the country returned to 1960 when white guys ruled, women knew their place, a manufacturing economy gave them a step up on the ladder, and no matter what a low-life white you were, you were better (in your own mind) than a black guy with a doctorate.
But that's not who we are any more, as a country. We're actually better than that. As the next election will prove.
EK (Somerset, NJ)
Oh God I hope you're right.
Nancy Lederman (New York City)
Trump's always been a notorious tightwad, noted for lending his name rather than money to any worthy cause.

My suspicion is that his tax returns would show zero charitable contributions. Or, alternatively, deductions for appearances of his brand as donation to nonprofits.
CB (New York)
Trump's "third person" campaign seems to be keeling further and further over from a dangerous threat into a sad laughingstock.

A- Moral Support: Trumps most popular and effective surrogates won't even attend the convention in large part because of his divisive rhetoric
B- Financial Support: sponsors and donors are refusing in droves,
C- Candidate Record: Trumps slowly-emerging actual record is that he has had 3 business "successes" and over 10 complete business failures, some of which are under federal examination as outright frauds.
D- Candidate responses: to all these major structural campaign issues, has been emotionally unstable, self-destructive, egotistical, and unsound.

Trump is an absurd "future shock" candidacy, from his slogan on down, that runs against the networkedm collaborative, sensitized tide of our modern world.
VicJane (Chicago IL)
There's another, larger point to be made in this episode: how Trump deals with other people's money. Except for his contribution the amount involved represent donations made by others. Did any of them expect that their generosity would not reach any veterans for so many months? It doesn't take that long to look up the federal tax status of organizations and many states have equally accessible records of how much to administrative/how much to charities of organizations claiming that status. If Trump cannot be a worthy fiduciary with these funds, how can he be a worthy fiduciary with the taxpayers' Revenue?
Michael (Williamsburg)
Veterans are a diverse group. They come from all walks of life. Without a draft and limited life prospects some go into the military for economic reasons. For those with criminal records it is a new start. For some it is an avenue to American citizenship. Some have the highest ideals of the "duty, honor and country" that General MacArthur spoke of at West Point. Military service and the prospect of death and injury are not shared burdens. Some services are "safe" while the Marines and Soldiers disproportionately are wounded and killed.
The nature of combat has changed and for some "boots on the ground" means they are piloting a drone from Arizona. For others the wars are no longer tank to tank or fighter to fighter but on the ground with no front line. Two thirds of the casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan are from IEDs. Those wounded and killed can be driving a resupply truck on a dirt road or hit my a rocket fired into their base camp. There is no safe haven behind "the lines".
Nationalism and patriotism are intertwined. The preservation of democratic values and our nation are high ideals. So veterans and active duty men and women are entitled to free speech. Just not the political use of their uniforms as stage props at a rally.
A strong national defense is about free men and women defending our nation and its democratic values. Not demagogic flatulence.
blackmamba (IL)
Donald Trump, in his very first political and acting campaign, is echoing the fictional Ebenezer Scrooge, Chauncey Gardner and Archie Bunker.

But Trump does not have the political and acting experience nor talent of Ronald Reagan. Nor does Trump have the Reagan gift for rhetorical racist euphemism. There are basketballs with more brains, courage and honor than either Bobbie Knight or Donald Trump.

While the road to Hades and perdition is paved with good intentions. And the love of money is the root of all evil and pride is the gravest of sins. America is not a business. But Trump is a pick-pocket giving America the 3-card Monte business.
Frank (Johnstown, NY)
I don't believe Trump ever wantedto be President. He never set up a staff, organized committees, developed any plans or spent any time learning about foreign policy or even US policy or government. He never did the minimum even an unsuccessful entrepreneur does when they go into a new business.

I think he was as caught off-guard as everyone else when people actually started voting for him.
Gerard (PA)
Poor man, he can't win! Even if he were really rich, and dumped a ton of money to charities this year, you would call it a publicity stunt - which it would be.
No, instead he is being honestly consistent. The art of the deal is persuasion, and to avoid commitments. This man does not go bankrupt; he forms companies that go bankrupt for him. He does not cheat on his wives, he just changes the model.
That makes the Presidency so attractive, because once won there will be no way to enforce the many and impractical promises he is making to close the deal.
Caveat voter !
Ken (MT Vernon, NH)
The newest contrived Trump controversy.

It is virtually impossible that Trump was scheming to steal the money collected for veterans.

With such attention paid to the original event and his strong support for veterans' causes in his campaign, could he possibly be that stupid or crass?

Therefore, all of this controversy is essentially theater.

I am sure it took a little time to actually collect pledged money from people, and then deciding who to give it to would take some time. Apparently, dozens of charities benefited from the money. I doubt Trump himself did any of that leg work other than giving direction and final approval.

When Trump complains about the media, this whole ridiculousness is a perfect example.
Cheryl (Yorktown)
If you make an outsized claim - one that is politically appealing to many and brags of your benevolence - you had better put up the proof and expect that it will be demanded. If the charities in fact did not receive what was promised, or is the amounts were not actually collected and distributed by your organization, and sent on to the charities, this was dishonest. If the money never gets there and is reported as having been distributed in IRS reporting, it is fraud. The "ridiculousness" was initiated entirely by Trump.
John Borrowman (Gallatin, TN)
"I am sure it took a little time to actually collect pledged money from people, and then deciding who to give it to would take some time."

Yes, this is an entirely plausible explanation. But, did Mr. Trump bother to offer it? No. He'd rather point the finger of blame at someone else. In this case, the press. Is this the temperament of someone we want in the Oval Office. I think not.
Mike W. (Brooklyn)
The ridiculous part is that it was actually the veteran groups themselves that started complaining *before* the media even started reporting it.

But for Trumphht to complain that the veteran groups weren't 'treating him fairly' or being 'sleazy' wouldn't have gone over well, even for his low bar of decency, so he used the press as a convenient punching bag.

As most victimizers are, he's very good at playing the victim card for himself.
PB (CNY)
Actually, I am becoming fascinated by the ongoing Stump the Trump Show. It's like watching some bizarre TV mini-series every day. Reminds me of being hooked on "Mad Men"--waiting for the anti-hero imposter to implode and melt down before our very eyes like the wicked witch in the Wizard of Oz. Drama is added by the Trumpster supporters cheering him on, no matter what the politically inexperienced, con artist, and deranged Donald did, says, or does.

Maybe The Donald just another manifestation of the crazed times in which we live, where there is some kind of mass reaction against rationality, common sense, science, and truth. Culturally, we seem riveted not by heroes doing good and decent things, but by despicable characters doing the wrong things in movies, TV, and (unfortunately) in politics.

Maybe it is nothing new. The ancient Greek dramas and Shakespeare's plays endure because the deeply flawed personalities of some of their most memorable characters held the seeds of their own destruction. And, like a train wreck, we keep watching to find out when and how they meet their just and inevitable end.

Nixon certainly fell victim to his tragic flaws of personality and character and went down a defeated man. There was a consensus and we were on the same page about that. But that was then.

I guess what worries me most these days is that politics is now grounded in fantasy, and we are actually having a heated public argument about whether Trump should be President or not.
wolf201 (Prescott, Arizona)
I agree, look at our fascination with the "walking dead".
Beachbum (Paris)
It's nothing new. But pogroms and other horrors started in similar ways.
George Gagner (Los Angeles)
And Hillary or Bernie is the answer? Be careful what you wish for . . .
jz (CA)
The question this column brings to mind is who should we blame for Trump. My thinking starts with the so-called powers that be, which means first the Republican Party which was willing, with unbridled cynicism, to put Palin a heartbeat away from the presidency. Since then, specifically once Obama took office, Republicans have worked tirelessly to foster fear of and anger at our government and our president, while doing everything they can to prevent the government and president from governing. Second would be the Fox media folks and similar voices who use fear and anger to sell products, mostly terrible investments like gold and silver. Third, we should include overzealous, narrow minded liberals whose politically correct agenda can’t figure out how to tolerate intolerance. They need to grow up. But, for all these easy targets, I always end up thinking we must ultimately blame the people themselves who support and will vote for Trump. They are sheep in wolves clothing. They are willing to suspend disbelief as if he were a fiction. In the end I think his supporters fall into two basic camps; those shameless politicians and politically driven voters who are willing to vote for him simply because he isn’t a democrat, and those driven by a perhaps instinctual fear of the “other,” a fear commonly referred to as racism. Excuse the pun, but racism trumps rationalism. It even trumps democracy. Even if Trump isn’t elected, he has held up a mirror for us to see how ugly we can be.
Janice Badger Nelson (Park City, Utah, from Boston)
Almost as good as the Romney-dog-on-car-roof-columns, but not as impactful.
The media keeps trying to find that golden nugget of truth that will bring The Donald down. So far, nothing. Meanwhile, his name appears in headline after headline. And Bernie Sanders and his cause have all but disappeared. I find that so disheartening.
Clack (Houston, Tx)
I have a feeling most of us knew a kid like The Donald when we were young. Haughty, self-absorbed, condescending, insulting, dismissive, defensive, bragging, vain, always lashing out, few if any friends - someone most of us regarded as rather ridiculous. Now imagine that kid having a chance to become President. That's The Donald.
hawk (New England)
He donated money, his own, and that of others to Veterans groups.

End of story.
Sarah D. (Monague, MA)
And had four bankruptcies that left everyone else holding the bag while he went on his merry way. That OK with you? Would you be OK with it if you were one of the ones he bilked? Or what if you wanted to get some education and fell for the so-called Trump University?

I don't understand how people like you can support the guy.
LizBurke (NYC)
When? There are no records and no vet groups have come forward with the proof. He can release his tax returns and prove that he has donated his own persona;l money to vet groups. Or anyone. He claims many things, most have come up false. Including his charity. Show me exactly when, how much and to whom he has personally donated dollars. Unfortunately, with this con man, there is no "end of story." His fictions go on forever.
Brad Blumenstock (St. Louis)
He did this not out of any sense of appreciation or respect for veterans, but as political theater to burnish his image, and the rubes fell for it.

End of story.
Rufus T. Firefly (NY)
Forrest Trump has been caught lying big time and its now time for the Fourth Estate to give him 'the Benghazi Treatment'.

The press must pummel him with questions 24/7 pointing out every inconsistency and lie regarding the Vet scandal. Do not let up. Make him fess up. Watch his over the top reaction to call people sleazes and other vile names. Point out the hogwash of his own 1m contribution that took 5 months. He stated that he needed to vet the charity that he was quite familiar with and even the most dim witted of his followers know that is a big fat lie. Force the issue--do not let him off the hook.

At the same time, have a full time team of shrinks analyze his behavior. The public needs to know that his arrogance, mendacity and need to demean one and all is all part of a deep rooted pathology.

Enough with the talking political heads. We need to display what is rattling around in Trumps head because it is very very dangerous.
J.D. Benoit (Neptune Beach, FL)
Gail
While being questioned last week about the several bankruptcies of his previous enterprises, Mr. Trump made the point with some emphasis that he had "personally" never gone bankrupt. As if only losing the money and ending the jobs of others is a point of pride. This guy is really a case.
jd
Opeteh (Lebanon, nH)
The problem with Mr. Trump is not that he is a self-centered, pompous and narcissistic lier, but that millions of Americans are ready to vote for him. Millions of voters believe it is quite ok to have a race-baiting supremacist as president. Millions of voters take no issue with his racist idea to ban Muslims from entering this country. Millions of voters applaud his inhuman proposal to deport 12 millions of undocumented workers. Millions of voters agree with his idea to built a wall that would separate us from our neighbor country. Millions of voters are susceptible to fascist ideas that threaten the foundation of the Republic. Millions of voters scare me.
Peter Rant (Bellport)
The most common slogan of all time in politics is "change," and Mr. Trump offers change, where Hillary does not. It's not so much that voters love Trump, it's that, for those who are not doing well now, want to try something different. For most Americans the details don't really matter.

As for the, "wall," issue, I think this has been trivialized way too much in the press. When I talk to Republicans, they always mention how their tax dollars go to undocumented Americans. It's probably a minor issue, but clearly, the fact that there are so many undocumented people in the country bothers a huge percentage of Americans.

In fact, I think it has damaged the basic nationalism of the country. After WWII the country was united and there was a willingness to pay your taxes for the "good of the country." Now, it a, "me first," way of thinking, where people feel their taxes are wasted on non-Americans. When almost anyone can become an American, it cheapens the citizenship.

So, Trump, for all his faults, has tapped into some of the basic gripes that Hillary will never address. It would be nice if all Americans would be more willing to pay their taxes for the good of our country.
just Robert (Colorado)
Yes, electing the Donald would be like electing Frankenstein's monster, the Penguin from Batman or Donald Duck. The last was famous for his tantrums and stinginess. We laughed at the cartoon character then now we are voting for him as president.
Coastal Existentialist (Maine)
All in keeping with past uniquely American actions......
seeing with open eyes (north east)
Comeon Gail - more TrumP? Do you columnists get a bonuse every time you vilify Trump and/or lie about Sanders?
AlLies Beget Lies. (new york)
And a closed mind!
Joseph Thomas (Falls Church, VA)
You shouldn't single out Trump for trying to use our veterans for political gain. How many politicians have paid lip service to the men and women who have served this country and then ignored them after the election? Or even voted against increasing veterans benefits?

And don't try to single out Trump for dodging the draft during Vietnam. It seems that avoiding military service is the norm now for all of our politicians, even those who are ready and willing to send someone else's children to be wounded or killed in unnecessary wars.

It seems the only time our veterans are treated with the respect they deserve is when someone is trying to use them for their own political gain. Wouldn't it be funny if our politicians declared war and no one showed up to fight!
Tokyo Tea (NH, USA)
"Wouldn't it be funny if our politicians declared war and no one showed up to fight!"

We had some of this situation already with Vietnam. That's why they instituted a draft.
AG (Wilmette)
Speaking of yourself in the third person has always been a clue. As you say, Nixon did. And so did Julius Caesar (Act 3, Scene 1, just before he is murdered)

"Are we all ready? What is now amiss
That Caesar and his senate must redress?"

And this:

"Know, Caesar doth not wrong, nor without cause
Will he be satisfied."

I am sure Caesar wished he had had time to say to the senate was they would not have Caesar to kick around any more.
sandyg (austin, texas)
AG: And surely you remember Cassius's remark: 'The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars, but in ourselves...' If American voters elect Donald Trump, we will have 'done it to ourselves'
JKF in NYC (NYC)
I've heard that if Trump wins, Canada is going to build a beautiful wall, and make him pay for it.
Kay Cole (Dallas, TX)
Yes, and in Mexico they are saying, "Build the wall to keep the Trumpers out!"
ama (los angeles)
cheating trump, bankrupt trump, dump trump, lumpy trumpy - overfed, over extended, over wrought and from these hands to the great gods ears, over with....he's hoisting himself by his own petard. let's sit back and watch the made for tv movie....
michael (sarasota)
I do so want Gilbert Gottfried to portray the real estate developer/empy headed huckster in the t.v. movie. But of course he will not. He is way too talented.
Charles (NY State)
Superman can use superhuman pressure from his hands (or say, from an election campaign) to turn a lump of coal into a diamond.

I think in Trump the process is reversed. He's getting more and more like himself.
Michael Roush (Wake Forest, North Carolina)
This will make no difference to those who support Donald J. Trump, including I suspect very many veterans.

Trump's supporters are in love and like those who have fallen in love they see only what they want to see in the object of their adoration.

Hopefully, there are not enough of these people to force the rest of us to have to live with a Trump presidency. To paraphrase, vote in haste, repent at leisure.
Speen (Fairfield CT)
At last, we see a exploration of the real Trump. The Reat Estate Rapist. Come in with borowed money…none of your own. Make huuuuge claims about some project. Burn it to the ground by financially burddening the investment … file for bankruptcy and sue a few people… thusly blaming the other guy and prancing around chest thumping how brilliant a business man you are. Leave town and on to the next go round. But nobody really cared back then because well he wasn't seeking to run the country in similar fashion or a variation there of.
Instead he just left in his wake a few hundred or thousand unemployed people, Some sort of concrete shell with his name plastered all over it and a team of lawyers covering his butt. Sort of like he is doing now by blaming the sleazy press for exposing all this bad business behavior.. which he thinks is good business because well , he hasn't gone to jail for it yet and may never not cause well it's just sleazy .. not illegal. What a way to run a country.
Steven (Marfa, TX)
Isn't it people just like him, in the world of financial engineering, who are already running the country (into the ground), and who've been richly rewarded for their disservice since 2008, instead of being thrown properly into jail for life?

He's only following the most obvious criminal path to success in America these days.
Robin LA (Los Angeles,CA.)
Politicians mirror an electorate increasingly disinvested in any personal stake in the tragedy of war. For better or worse, we've grown accustomed to a political system running on auto pilot.
Apparently we Americans have come to expect our Wars and Democracies to be "not messy" and against this backdrop, Donald Trump is a fly in the ointment.
Michael Steinberg (Westchester, NY)
The I.R.S. got Al Capone!!!!
What are they waiting for? A Commander and Thief?
michael (sarasota)
Good One, Michael!
WFGersen (Etna, NH)
The Richard Nixon analogy is apt... he ran against Hubert Humphrey, a candidate selected by the Democrat party who generated little enthusiasm among new voters and liberals, who favored Gene McCarthy and, until he was assassinated, Robert Kennedy. These unenthusiastic voters stayed home or voted for a man who had "a secret plan" for ending the war in Vietnam rather than supporting a man who supported the status quo.
Cowboy Marine (Colorado Trails)
The official names of the two main political parties in the United States going back about 200 years are: 1) the Republican Party; and 2) the Democratic Party. There is no such thing as the "Democrat" party.
Paul (Westbrook. CT)
I am nearly exhausted by the stupendous idiocy of Trump. His moronic sorties against what he calls the establishment leave me with a sour taste in my mouth. Even his deferment from military service for foot in mouth disease has a cultural bias attached to it. The pathetic gathering of Vets when he was pushed to announce his donations, gave me a feeling of disgust that our Vets, among whom I am one, felt they needed to be seen as beggars to this loudmouthed egomaniac. As an ex-marine from the Korean War, I cannot understand any military person standing up for this blowhard. Like some cowards, he's a bully. The judge ruling on Trump U is a bad judge because he didn't fold under the pressure of the bully and his lawyers. His attitude towards women makes me nauseous. I am old enough to remember when his hateful attitudes were the norm. If that's the Great America he wants back, he can have it. I don't! I think we are better than that and despite the bigotry in our country we were able to overcome it and elect our first black President -TWICE! Hurray for us! What is ahead? Well, we might elect our first woman President. Trump accuses Hillary of playing the woman's card. What card is he playing? The billionaire bully card?
morGan (NYC)
Gail,
Now that you willfully joined the cheering chorus for HRC @ the Daily Clinton,formerly NYT- I have a Q:
Can you please tell us how much madam neo-con had ever donated or raised for the Vets? Either from her own hundredths of millions or from their self-enriching racket,aka foundation.
90% of these Vets are soldiers who fought in Iraq.
Madam neo-con voted to send these soldiers to Iraq so she look macho and tough. And if that vote wasn't enough, she attacked Obama in 2014 for not sending America soldiers to another death trap in Syria.
As far as I know, Trump never send any American soldiers to war anywhere.
Ken (Tillson, New York)
How about mentioning Trump's offensive reference to McCain's imprisonment in every column like you mentioned Romney's dog, or pick a reference to women, Muslims, Mexicans, or the disabled? I'm sure I missed someone.
Jan (Cape Cod, MA)
All of us with at least half a brain have been consumed of late with the dire implications of a President Trump--for America and for the world. But perhaps we should be at least as concerned, if not more so, with the prospect of a President Trump's vice president, since the likelihood of him going wacko under the pressures of the U.S. Presidency seem more and more inevitable.
TheraP (Midwest)
Bingo!

Yes, I feel certain he is pre psychotic - at the very least.

And, yes, the maniac must never be elected. Because he can't stand people around him unless they're lesser beings. So... Dear god in heaven, preserve us from either the Don or his Con!
Tom Farrell (DeLand, FL)
Going wacko? Like in the future?
Lee Harrison (Albany)
The spectacle of Trump as the presidential candidate of the GOP (he has the pledged votes) is the most riveting and gruesome horror story I have seen in a long time.

It meets every inch of the "if it bleeds, it leads" test of journalism -- yet increasingly it is taking on the attraction of a Godzilla movie -- cheesy effects and all.

The Donald is the enraged monster now -- he squashes this house --he turns that way ... we swats at the fighters buzzing around him and putting inconsequential bullets into his very thick hide.

But we munch popcorn, and we know how the plot will unfold.

We've got 4 months to go to the general election. Trump doesn't even have the formal nomination yet -- but these kinds of movies are all about the first 15 minutes, and they're passed.

This will get even more agonizing for the GOP., watching Trump lurching this way and that, crushing only his own, increasingly exposed as a guy in a rubber suit pretending to be a monster.

The GOP should start wondering whether Trump will make it to the third reel. A pro knows to stick it out, even though it's obviously turning into "WaterWorld." Kevin Costner stuck it out; he's a pro.

Trump's modus operandi is to bail -- leaving the suckers holding the bag. The GOP better start thinking about what they will do when Trumpie decides he's not having fun anymore.

Enraged wounded brainless creatures don't go quietly and usually stomp a lot more of their own than anything else.
Anant Vashi (Charleston, SC)
Very nicely described Lee Harrison, I think you nailed it. After the conventions the time for theatrics will be over. Trump will be asked to be a real presidential candidate and it will infuriate him. He will crumble under the weight of his own personality, defending his litany of outrageous comments and with the fact that he is about to get schlonged by a woman. The Republicans, who careen from despising him to accepting him, will be left to just observe the implosion, and will be exposed as a party bereft of any true, consistent or unifying convictions and policy agenda. It will be an absolute disaster for them, and that is why those Republicans with any intellect at all, are abstaining. Trump will have accomplished one thing through this election, and that is affirming that the myth of the modern Republican Party does not really exist.
Tom Williford (Marshall, Minnesota)
Brilliant analysis--with one minor (and scary) correction: we don't have 4 months until the general election, but 6 months. The current drama is whether or not Trump will make it to the convention. After Ted Cruz and John Kasich suspended their campaigns, I had abandoned my previous prediction of a Kasich-Rubio ticket coming out of a brokered deal in Cleveland in July. Now I am embracing it again--the vet contribution is just the beginning; the Trump U scandal will bury him, even for many of his followers. But Clinton still wins the general election, based on the cravenness of how the majority of GOP elected officials have embraced this charlatan. My fear is that Wasserman-Schultz does not have the farsightedness of a Howard Dean to run a 50-state campaign down ticket, and the U.S. will stumble along with a divided ineffective government.
Clausewitz (St. Louis)
You are spoiling the fun.
Just saying (California)
“There you go again” using words from another Democrat turned Republican presidential candidate. Funny that Reagan was also characterized by many as a crazy, dangerous, actor but, by some accounts, he did all right.

Now, I fully admit that The Donald has loads to deride. But so does Ms. Hillary! The Clinton Foundation's sketchy money trails? E-mail double-talk? Benghazi?

Ms. Collins, I get you’re on Team Hillary. But in the interest of fairness and integrity, how about writing about some of Hillary’s own serious doozies, rather than glossing over them?
Manderine (Manhattan)
Funny that Reagan was also characterized by many as a crazy, dangerous, actor but, by some accounts, he did all right.

Really?

Ever heard of the IRAN-CONTRA deal?
We are still digging out form the "trickle-down Regeannomic"!
jds966 (telluride, co)
Bhengazi??? gimme a break!
Billy from Brooklyn (Hudson Valley NY)
Trump seems to be even more fun to write about than a candidate who straps a family pet to the roof oh his car.

Trump and Sanders are living proof that many Americans think that the political process is a big joke, and that it does not matter at all who becomes president. So under all the humor, this is a very sad situation in this country. I guess that we are getting just what we all deserve.
Charlie B (USA)
I was drafted in 1966, and served my two years. If I had the resources to fake a "foot thing" like Mr. Trump I would have jumped at the chance. Vietnam Nam was a tragic farce, and I have no quarrel with those who avoided it...unless they then went on to advocate military sacrifice for other people's children while their own families are protected by wealth and power.

Military adventurism doesn't yet appear to be among the countless sins of Trump's crazy and evil policy stances. As such, he is still better than the likes of Chaney and the many war-mongering politicians who never deigned to serve.
Anna Rich (elmont, new york)
How is he going to stomp out Isis, their families and children, if not with some military adventure? He sounds quite willing to use "the greatest military in the history of the world"__ if I heard him right.
Melda Page (Augusta, ME)
How?
Charlie B (USA)
@Anna - You have a point. Analyzing Trump statements is like Bible study: you can use them to prove any point, because they are a tangle of contradictions.

Please don't take my sympathy for draft avoiders as an endorsement of Trump. He's by far the worst person to ever be the nominee of a major party, but his lack of military service is not the problem. Obama, another non-military guy, has used our forces powerfully but with restraint.
sjs (Bridgeport)
And just when I thought the creepiness factor of Trump couldn't get any higher.
shend (NJ)
Paul Ryan's so far refusal to endorse Trump looks more intelligent everyday. For all the other Party over Country Republicans their endorsement of Trump will be hung around their necks forever, and The Donald is just beginning. His best shtick is yet to come.
Manderine (Manhattan)
Wait, wait, "John not-a-war-hero because he was captured McCain", is supporting Trump.
Clearly proof the man has dementia. First, Sarah Palin as VP and now McCain is a Drumpf supporter. I hope his family notices before it's too late.
hankfromthebank (florida)
so let me understand...Mr Trump raised 6 million dollars for veterans and while anyone else would get praised..he gets bashed because of when he made the payment?
Alfonso Duncan (Houston, TX)
Are you that naive?

Donald Trump was not going to give any of his money to charity.
William Park (LA)
No, you don't understand. He wasn't planning on actually giving the money to Vets until he was shamed into it. You see, Donald Dumb is a liar. A fraud. A clown. He is weak-minded, thin-skinned, immature, uninformed, and lacks any moral fiber or compass. He is rudderless. He is amoral.
Now you understand. You're welcome.
John Edelmann (Arlington VA)
No. It is question of whether he made the payment or not.
David (California)
Donald Trump revealed as a cheap, incompetent liar? What, you think the Republican establishment will slow their rush to climb on his bandwagon?

Donald Trump, birther, has already announced himself several times over to be a racist. That fact alone should have disqualified his presidential bid. Learning that Trump is a cheap, incompetent, lying racist will be a bridge too far for McConnell et al.? I doubt it.
William Park (LA)
Once T-Rump begins to crumble in early fall, the bandwagon Republicans will suddenly do another about face, and claim, "What, me? No, I never supported him. Don't be silly. I knew he would fail. I told you all along."
Allen82 (Mississippi)
Excellent commentary. The reason he called the WaPo reporter sleazy was as a pre-emptive attack, or perhaps because he is a 3-year old lashing out. Take your pick. You are now, of course, sleazy for reporting the truth. Congratulations.

Perhaps someone should tell your editors and reporter Michael Barbaro who wrote a front page article this morning titled: “Donald Trump’s Secret Weapon: Letters of Love, Flattery and Revenge” to quit humanizing “Don the Con”. Even Ted Bundy had his softer side.
Carol (Midwest USA)
Trump's team helped him win in Indiana by getting Bobby Knight to actually say, at one of his rallies, that Trump was the most qualified presidential candidate ever. I would love to know how much the pay-off was. It was a brilliant move. Like my dad has drawled, "Most of those IU fans wouldn't even be able to find their way to Bloomington." Those are the people, the Bobby Knight fans of Indiana, who put Trump over the top to get this nomination.
Blue state (Here)
Doing a mitzvah such that no one knows. What a mensch.

I don't think that continuing shock and awe is going to work though. He's a bad candidate, but tribally speaking, so is Clinton. Tribal mentality may yet throw this race to Trump. Can no one legitimate feel his voters pain?
Alfonso Duncan (Houston, TX)
I'll hold my nose and vote for Hillary. Your circus barker has no track record in governance, does he?
Robert Prowler (Statesville,NC)
Bob Dole constantly referred to himself in the third person. But so what? If Trump ends up in the White House which house will that leave us in?
David Henry (Concord)
Since Nixon, each GOP candidate/president has been consistently worse. Watergate was about paranoia and cover-up, personal, then Reagan used PUBLIC funds for his brand of lawlessness (Iran-Contra), and the Bush family used Iraq as its phony justification for maiming and killing innocent people.

Now Trump. Will the American public learn?
John Edelmann (Arlington VA)
Looks like never when you read the comments here by Trump supporters. Makes me ill.
Manderine (Manhattan)
Brain dead fox and friends folks don't care....
Celia Sgroi (Oswego, NY)
"Have we ever had a president who referred to himself in the third person? The answer, as a number of readers have been kind enough to point out is — yes! We had Richard Nixon." Bernie Sanders also refers to himself in the third person. But he is not going to be president, and neither is Trump.
jhbev (NC)
Marian Anderson used the imperial "we", rather than "I" and thus made a political statement.

But that was a long time ago
Colenso (Cairns)
Trump isn't mean. He's just careful with his money, a trait he undoubtedly inherited along with his wealth.

OK, I take it back. Of course, Trump is mean in every sense, and perhaps it's unfair to blame his parents for this. While his upbringing and genes undoubtedly played no little part in making the man, it still can't really explain why in 2016 the man is such a rotten bounder, such a sly and venal shyster who evidently takes personal delight and pleasure in ripping off the most easily duped and vulnerable, as the latest documents from Trump University prove.

Many commenters have suggested that Trump meets the classical definition of a narcissist. Actually, it seems clearer and clearer that Trump doesn't. An ordinary narcissist is fairly common and, while certainly not your ideal housemate, doesn't begin to come close to Trump in vindictiveness. Even Richard Nixon and Andrew Jackson were not in the same league of unscrupulous and calculated nastiness, taking evident pleasure from the suffering of others.

No, it seems Trump is that rare, quasi-mythical beast, not in this instance a beautiful, 'yuge' unicorn, but, according to Erich Fromm (1900 – 1980), the most dangerous of all those with a personality disorder, the Malignant Narcissist.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malignant_narcissism
Entera (Santa Barbara, CA)
Apparently Fred Trump/Drumpf's mantra to his least favorite child, Donald, was to inculcate him with "You're a king. You're a killer." in hopes it would compensate for his other failings as an heir to the Trump empire, which was built on the foundation of government assistance to developers in the post war era.
Doug (Virginia)
The downside of mentioning the habit of speaking of oneself in the third person, shared by Trump and Nixon, is that Sanders does it too.

Perhaps it is a sign of inflated self-regard and a perpetually aggrieved personality that complains of the system being unfair and 'rigged' when things don't go one's way.

In any fas, it's always unsettling and seems to make for strange bedfellows.
Bruce (The World)
Trump doesn't surprise me. He continues to dump on the same things that Republican right wing media like Rush and Glen, and news media like Fox, convinced those who drank the koolaid were "the real problems with America". Because the base just "knows" that this is all rigged, according to the aforesaid actors, Donald gains brownie points and a wink and shrug from the base. Because they know the 'real' truth.
Aaron (Chicago)
Trump supporters despise Rush, Glen Beck and Fox News if you really want to know.
FXQ (Cincinnati)
Dodging Donnie just can't stand the heat when the lights are tuned on or the rock he is hiding under is turned over to reveal his lies. His ballistic temper tantrums are what's most concerning, never mind the reasons for those meltdowns. This man clearly does not have the character or temperament to be the president of the United States of America, and Commander in Chief of our armed forces. The military is one of our most sacred institutions that has been at the forefront of leading by example the principles of our constitution. As congress has regressed into total partisan dysfunction, it's comforting to know that our military still holds people accountable, and represents our pluralistic society. Mr. Trump is the antithesis of accountability and inclusiveness.
Carl Ian Schwartz (Paterson, New Jersey)
He can't stand the heat because his makeup would melt and his wig would fall off.
me (world)
We need a new name for this jerk, but not in the format he uses, with an adjective before the first name. Let's instead keep the first name but change the last name - and here it is:
Donald Fraud.
Has a nice ring to it! We need to neuter and eliminate his last name, which is actually quite a strong, powerful word, and replace it with exactly what he is:
DONALD FRAUD.
vca (Los Angeles)
Dodging Donny... That's brilliant.... I love it
michelle (Rome)
Option D) Maybe Trump had no intention of giving the charity money to the Vets, maybe he wanted to keep the money to help his broke campaign?
PaulB (Cincinnati, Ohio)
Trump is struggling mightily to establish a new standard for being President: how much money the candidate has contributed to charity and worthy causes. After finally turning over (under duress) nearly $6million to veterans, he then excoriated Hillary Clinton for not giving anything to vets.

Are we then likely to see ads and stump speeches by Trump heralding his contributions to, say, Mexican social service organizations? "What has Hillary done for Mexico? Nothin! A big fat zero. Mexicans I know really love me, or they will, just wait and see. When they build that wall for me, I guarantee you one thing: Hillary won't give one dime for my wall to help Mexicans."
Mktguy (Orange County, CA)
The problem is not Trump so much as the press's coverage of his antics. Here's a recommendation: Instead of being useful idiots in the Trump campaign, the press should do something to reclaim their dignity. #TrumpBack - When the candidate personally attacks someone in the profession, it would be nice to see a unified protest. Simply stand and face the back of the room for a short period of time, perhaps one minute.
William Park (LA)
Except the media feeds on his antics, even when he trains his fire on them. He is their sugar, their drug. He is easy, effortless "news" filler. Just stick a mic in front of him, and fill air time. No work or effort required. Feed the beast for cheap.
The horrible media is the real monster here. T-Rump is just the one riding its back.
dEs JoHnson (Forest Hills)
A chuckle-less Gail. Must be a side-effect of the campaign. Look, the problem is not Trump. He's the symptom. The problem is the willingness of anyone to support him. And that begins with racism.

The problem is compounded by the gutless, heartless, brainless GOPers. They've spent so long opposing Obama and demonizing Democrats that they thought Trump was a great guy, great and funny. The jokes on them, but worse, it's on all of us. And Sanders doesn't get it. He thinks he invented social justice, and will drive us all into poverty to prove how clueless he is of the arc of American history.
Jonathan (Brooklyn)
dEs - I agree but perhaps the silver lining of this campaign is that it has brought the racists above ground to the mainstream political discourse. If so then that (I would hope) is the first step on the (long) road to expanding broad-mindedness and a sensitive worldview.
Ashley Madison (Atlanta)
DEs, you forgot good old fashioned sexism. Neither Bernie nor the Donald would have a prayer without sexism.
Nora01 (New England)
Why the gratuitous swipe at Sanders? How did that strengthen your argument? He may not have "invented" social justice, but he has tried all his life to defend it. Who else has?
ClearEye (Princeton)
Following in his father's footsteps, Trump created a ''favorable environment'' for his projects by cozying up to politicians with major campaign contributions, hiring their close associates, and flattery/threats.

In New York, these practices ran through the administrations of Abe Beame, Ed Koch, David Dinkins and Mario Cuomo (Trump hired Andew Cuomo's law firm when Mario was Governor.) http://bit.ly/1VyWydN

Like other developers I have met, he never particularly means anything he says. Instead, his words are selected to create an environment in which he will eventually get his way. So, the real question is, what does he really want as President of us all, a job for which is unprepared and spectacularly unsuited?

It is pretty clear that he is not nearly as successful as he always claims to be, but he has never before been subject to much sustained scrutiny at the national level. The veterans' scam and Trump U. are indicative of what lies beneath.

Ms. Collins, you have done an admirable job nailing Jello to a tree. Let us hope that your colleagues in the press step up their game before it is too late.
L Martin (Nanaimo,BC)
Your not-nice-to-me, lighter-side-of-crazy commentary, and your "Mexican" -sounding name "Collins", are inviting the Tweet- wrath of the beloved candidate.
Don Shipp, (Homestead Florida)
It is increasingly evident with each passing day that Donald Trump may have some serious psychological dysfunction. His bullying, compulsive defensiveness when questioned or criticized, exaggerated narcissism, and frequent fabrications on a variety of subjects, mark him as mentally unstable, and should he become president, a clear and present danger " to national security of the United States and the well being of world.
Nick Adams (Laurel, Ms)
There are moments in this sick saga when I'm sure there's no chance that Trump The Buffoon can be elected. This column is one of those moments. The Buffoon doesn't do well when asked a simple. direct question.
But then there are other moments, more numerous, when I see crowds, their eyes glazed over, cheering The Buffoon on. The old New Jersey couple, swindled by Trump University, but still plan to vote for him, the old redneck sucker punching a protester, the cowardly Republicans now supporting him-they scare me as much as The Buffoon. How many of them are there? Is it possible the dumb, the clueless, the bigots outnumber the decent, intelligent people in this country?
Pat (NJ)
The question is, how many people who are smart enough to see through Trump's dangerous nonsense will come out to vote for him?

More than anything, I am thinking of the young, who have every right to be disaffected by the system they see in place: one that sees no problem with loading them down with college debt and jobs that can't pay the rent.

Hillary, bless her, despite her solid as granite qualifications for the job as President (and several notable flaws, which pale in comparison to the Donald's many horrendous ones) is a boring boring boring candidate who will be an excellent President, who will indeed at least begin to solve the problems that our young are experiencing.

Are the young'uns in our midst smart enough to see this and motivated enough to go to the polls and vote?
Rob &amp; Eric (<a href="http://icygaze.com" title="icygaze.com" target="_blank">icygaze.com</a>)
It's more than possible that "the dumb, the clueless, the bigots outnumber the decent, intelligent people in this country." In fact, it's statistically certain that the majority have average intelligence, which makes them more likely to be seduced by simplistic explanations and nationalistic jargon. Thus Plato's critique of democracy: The majority are not the most intelligent among us, so they should not be telling us what to do.
David Fishlow (Panama)
Yes. In most countries.
Dobby's sock (US)
Yes, yes, the man is repugnant.

Shall we now climb off our high horse and take a gander at our own candidate?!

The one that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The one with a foundation that took/receives donations (in the billions?) from many nefarious characters whilst working for the US as SoS. The one that sold record amounts of Military Arms to Human Rights Violators. The one that sold US uranium rights here in American't to the Soviets. The one that has not seen a war or military act that she could not resist nor push for. The one with millions of women and children civilians killed and un-homed under her watch.

I for one I'm not to sure about pointing fingers at a lying bully and calling him awful, when the opposite choice has a proven track record of actual lies and real world record of blood upon her hands.

But we do overlook things when its for our side don't we.
SMDH...
Sarah (Arlington, VA)
Oh dear, Dobby's sock, the biggest lie is in your own comment, calling Hillary Clinton "our own" candidate. What a hoot.
Rea Tarr (Malone, NY)
"Our side," Dobby's sock?

What makes you think you're on my side with that spew of nonsensical balderdash about the candidate we -- Democrats, smart, wise, rational, friendly, honest -- want as our next President?

Go for another side to be on.
MVH1 (Decatur, Alabama)
"our candidate"? I bet your candidate is Bernie.
Thomas Renner (New York City)
This is just the trump pattern, say anything to get free press time and attention, change your story to fit the situation. When you get called out shout that you are hurt and being treated unfairly and that the folks who caught you are loosers. It's great the media is starting to call out slippery Donald!
Patrick Stevens (Mn)
Think carefully about this: a majority of the Republican leadership is backing this man to be their Presidential candidate for 2016. Now, think about the quality of leadership that has selected Donald Trump as the standard bearer for the Republican Party. Is this the party you want to control your Nation? To control any thing? Think about it.
Carl Ian Schwartz (Paterson, New Jersey)
No, and no, and no. The GOP has become a walking consumer fraud.
Majortrout (Montreal)
The Republicans now control Congress and the Senate, and many of the states!
Tony Hartford (Dayton, OR)
I did and reconfirmed my realization why torture is against the law.
terry brady (new jersey)
Trump is broke, busted, bankrupt looking for nickels in the couch coushions. Anyone trying to get out-of-debt recognizes the pattern by the jobs one will take. Trump will sell apples on the sidewalk or wear a billboard. Trump University that went out and found homeless people using their cousins credit card to go to a program designed by idiots for fools. Trump University proves his hustler needs and conditions. Standing in the rain selling Micky Mouse umbrellas (that fell off a truck in Brooklyn) proves my point. Anyone passing Trump Towers understands New York-New York highly practiced bankruptcy because you see the tackiness, tin-plated fake metals and mirrors everywhere style of going out of business. The cake-taker is his lawyers that have been threaten to be disbarred from every judge and state in America. Nevertheless, his use of old Benito Mussolini news reel films for policy substance and persona imitation that he watches while rubbing testosterone into his skin is a bridge too far for most of America.
Beth Reese (nyc)
My father would have been appalled to see the veterans lined up as props behind Trump as he spewed his usual bellicose miasma of nonsense with a soupcon of gotta CYA. Do these vets realize that Trump considers his time at a "military academy" real military service? Daddy never made it overseas during WWIi but was so proud of all the guys who fought and died. When I voted for Barack Obama in 2008. I pulled the lever for my father as well as myself. He would have been so proud of BPO. He would be so ashamed of the rise of the charlatan Trump.
DougTerry com (Maryland)
The people who gathered at the Lincoln Memorial last week were not all vets, in fact, veterans might not even have made up the majority. They were in town for the annual Rolling Thunder motorcycle parade honoring the dead and unaccounted for from the Vietnam war. By turning their event into a Trump rally, they made their intentions to memorialize the dead into a sham. When this event began more than 30 yrs ago, it was a dignified and surprisingly large tribute that got the attention of the nation. Now, it is just a chance for motorcycle riders to ride together and hang out. The Trump rally shows that the annual ride/tribute should be ended. It is an event in search of a true purpose. It has outlived its time.
Chris Boese (New York City)
Extra points for "bellicose miasma." Excellent word choice!
michael (sarasota)
Beth: the same goes for my late father, uncles, cousins. As a (volunteer) worker in nursing homes I am saddened by the number of the elderly Americans I speak with every day who are afraid for their future, even though some of them only have precious little time left on earth. The real estate developer/huckster has deliberately made countless citizens very sick.
Richard A. Petro (Connecticut)
Dear Ms. Collins,
Shhhh....stop bringing up the "bad stuff" about Mr. Trump. Let's list all the good things he's done for the country;
a. Made Ted Cruz drop out of the race (As scary as Mr. Trump is, he doesn't hold a candle to the man Mr. Boehner called Satan and they're both on the same side!)
b. Made the noted columnist and right wing fanatic Bill Kristol vow to unveil his OWN candidate at the GOP/TP/KOCH AFFILIATE Convention/Free For All this July (Tell me, please, that NOBODY has cloned Hitler, please??)
c. Made Latinos, Hispanics, women, Muslims, reporters, etc. ALL start registering to vote just to vote against him (Sort of a "negative ground swell" of counter anger to Mr. Trump's followers.)
d. Made the Koch brothers retire to their "Hidden Cave of Darkness", very near Dick Cheney's "Hole of Despair" in the mountains somewhere, to contemplate, via goat entrails, their next, sinister move/donation (Scott walker has lost the directions to this cave but, sad to say, HE'S no longer welcome.)
e. Most importantly, single handedly, Mr. Trump may cause the grotesque monster the GOP/TP/K.A. has become to destroy itself in the coming real elections this fall (I know, pollsters and pundits are trying hard to "make this a close contest" but, really, "Trump vs. Clinton" is like an I.Q. test between "Flippy the Clown and Einstein". Surely, "Flippy" wins the "Clown" vote but is that enough?).
But, maybe, some REAL veteran's organizations might have gotten some money, perhaps?
Bill (Cambridge, MA)
Public relations trumps reality
mjweir (michigan)
People who don't want the publicity don't go on every national news station, and every newspaper, blabbering about their event and how they are personally going to contribute 1m. They just do it.

The only thing Donald Trump wanted was the publicity and if no one called him on it, likely he would have kept the money (fraud) and never given the personal donation.

My biggest problem with Donald Trump is he thinks the rules don't apply to him. He imagines himself above the law. Half of Congress is already like this. Do we really want a President who flaunts it so blatantly?
Ray Gibson (Naples Fl)
I cling to the fading hope that a majority of voters will recognize that a craven snake oil salesman does not belong in the oval office, but then I remember that they reelected Nixon by a comfortable majority - and GW Bush. You would have thought that they learned a lesson, but memory and critical thinking does not appear to run deep in our character.
oldBassGuy (mass)
Cool, another Trump article.

Trump cares about vets, ya don't say.
Trump is shifty with how he manages his money, who could have guessed?

I was getting ready to read a serious article where Trump articulates specifics related to how America needs to re-invest in infrastructure, education, and R+D. Ok, we don't have time for that crap.

But of course, with Trump there is no there there. So instead we get another idiotic article about an idiotic candidate. Cool, give me more, not.
Janet Camp (Mikwaukee)
Unless you are a first time reader here, you will know that Ms. Collins takes a humorist approach to her editorials--something most of us are much in need of these days.
Lee Harrison (Albany)
Look, we are going to be stuck with this all the way to November, and then God help us, what's the chance Trump actually wins the presidency .... unless ...

The thing about Trump we can depend on is that he cuts and runs when he doesn't like "the deal" anymore.
Dave (Eastville Va.)
When ever I hear Donald Trump he reminds me of the late Rodger Dangerfield, I mean no offence to Mr Dangerfield.
Frank (Durham)
Trump set up his "veteran fund event" to give himself cover for running away from a debate. He had to show that the reason was not fear of tough questioning, but for a "better" purpose. Everything after that was just improvising and inventing, including announcing that he had collected six million, which he had not. It is the basis of his campaign to promise big things which, as this shows, he has no idea and no plans to bring them about. Anyone who talks so much about money and makes one's worth based on this, is someone who does not gladly separate himself from it. That an ignorant, self-centered, vulgar and politically dangerous person like him should be a candidate, much less a president, is simply beyond human comprehension. Moreover, that politicians should support him so as to not lose a conservative seat on the Supreme Court, is the height of recklessness and disregard for the good name and safety of our country.
Linda Shortt (Rolling Prairie, In.)
I'm still troubles how any veteran with an ounce of respect for themselves and their fellow veterans could support him!!!11
Stage 12 (Long Island)
Frank:
Well said.
R. Law (Texas)
Gail, we opt for another possibility:

D) Trumpster Drumpfster's complicated relationship with truth and facts

which was so amply demonstrated in front of the press when he pitched his branding and ' business acumen ' by hauling out a bunch of steaks on a table, pretending they were Trump steaks, when the press had to only turn over the packages to see the steaks were ordinary meat purchased from local stores:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/hey-trump-wheres-the-beef-...

The guy is a shameless charlatan of the first order, that many psychologists have spilled a lot of ink explaining how dangerous it would be for him to be anywhere near the Oval.

It is a hallmark of GOPers' bankruptcy (in all senses) when any one of them lines up behind El Ignoramus (hat tip Paul Krugman) to endorse him.
Christine McMorrow (Waltham, MA)
At least Richard Nixon was smart and in touch with world political dynamics. I can't believe I just wrote that, but it's what I feel when comparing Nixon to Trump.

Lordy, Gail, you will now be on the "list'. In fact that list (I don't dare write hit list) is growling longer by the day. I can only imagine the rage boiling in that red-faced loud-mouthed face in reading your column this morning. In fact, I can't even imagine him reading Sunday Review with all the editorials---so many!

I think you encapsulated the Trump hypocrisy right here: "We have heard a lot from Trump about his passion for veterans lately. It’s an intense interest that goes back at least … a year. Before that, his major involvement with the military appeared to be getting a deferment for “a foot thing” when he was eligible for the draft during the war in Vietnam."

Like many an armchair quarterback politician, Trump believes his instincts in world affairs are better than the actions of experienced career diplomats. Which is a scary thought: isn't it bad enough that shoot from the hip policy ideas could affect our daily lives in the US without thinking about a Trump foreign policy "doctrine"?

Now what would that be? If you don't know, think long and hard before Election Day.
ACW (New Jersey)
If Nixon ran today, he'd be booted out of the GOP as far too liberal. The new book 'The Limousine Liberal' by historian Steve Fraser notes that his administration saw the creation of the EPA and OSHA and of the Philadelphia Plan, affirmative action for minorities in the construction trades. He also supported a guaranteed annual income to replace welfare, low-income housing aid, and federal grants to the arts, though Congress blocked these. He introduced wage and price controls to fight inflation. Not to mention the beginning of thawing the Cold War with his trip to China.
And Nixon served in WW II. Though when you check the record, it's surprising how many presidents had no military service at all (other than being Commander in Chief): here's a list.
http://www.classroomhelp.com/lessons/Presidents/Presidents_Military_Serv...
Can we dig Nixon up? I'd vote for him.
I never thought I'd say that, either .... but then, I never thought Trump would get as far as he has, until he did. Or the possibility of a Trump vs Sanders race, in which case I'm staying home or writing in Martin O'Malley.
John Galt (USA)
Oh I've thought long and hard about how I pray that Hillary gets indicted. Keep being sheep
Bos (Boston)
Shady people like him are a dime a dozen in NY. This is not a slight of the place for there are plenty of honest people who would keep their words with a simple handshake. The point is that he is no genius. In another column, a veteran author said Trump uses veterans like prop. Yet the masses eat it up. Of course, Trump has some help. Even now, networks would cover him bears to the honeypot. On the other hand, President Obama had an intimate Q&A with the citizens of Elkhart, Indiana hosted by PBS last night. No one cares.
SMoore.redhen (PA)
I care! It was Obama at his best!
Richard Luettgen (New Jersey)
I can’t help but react to this and similar columns by pointing out that they reek of fear at the growing realization that this guy could be our next president, particularly given Hillary’s growing problems, with “trustworthiness” numbers, with eMailGate … with California. I can’t say I’ve felt the same way, as I could live with Hillary’s election – I never believed it would be the end of the world. It just would be a continuation of the past 7 ½ years of no movement: good intentions paving a road not to Hell but to nowhere.

Folks, Donald J. Trump is a flawed human being and his need for self-aggrandizement is every bit as massive as LBJ’s was, who took a very different road to validating it. But there’s something to be said for a talented and energetic man desperately in search of a legacy: look at what that motivation did for LBJ, and what those who defend his Great Society would point to as the gains we made by tolerating HIS massive ego.

Trump will continue to trip over a past that was not as saintly as we like our presidents to live (so will Hillary). Compare it, point for point, with Hillary’s and I think it’s a wash – two people on the make and not too particular about how they got ahead and stayed there. If Jeb had been a better contender against a natural force like Trump, I’d be defending him. But that’s not the choice that confronts us. The question that does confront us is whether we want politics that move us forward again … or we don’t.
NA (New York)
The constant refrain that LBJ was "flawed," Trump is flawed, therefore Trump could be as successful legislatively as LBJ--well, it's just absurd. LBJ understood the intricacies of crafting legislation better than anyone of his era. (And he had willing allies within the Republican ranks.). Trump isn't interested in detail or in building consensus. When challenged, he lashes out. And he does it publicly, in a way that makes him appear unhinged. Lyndon Johnson was far from perfect. He was vain and insecure. But he wasn't so obviously unprepared for the most powerful job in the world.

The Republican party is about to nominate Donald Trump as its candidate for president of the United States. Of course people are distressed about that fact, including many Republicans.
Kevin Rothstein (Somewhere East of the GWB)
Oh, Richard. So now Trump is like LBJ?

What's next?

Trump as FDR?

Except someone said FDR had a second rate mind but a first class temperament.

I don't know about Trump's mind, except that Donald sure acts quite disturbed. As for Donald's temperament...

I give you credit for dogged persistence. I bet your success in business is due in no small part to said persistence.

The idea that Trump can bring us all together---kumbaya---and we will all join hands and sing the 1970 Coke commercial jingle while silently chanting "Ohm", is quite a stretch, don't you think?
Janet Camp (Mikwaukee)
The only reason we cannot “move forward” is a totally uncooperative Congress, dominated by the same nincompoops whose party is in such disarray that it now sponsors Trump.
Socrates (Downtown Verona, NJ)
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel....except when unidentified flying bone spurs were Donald Trump's first refuge from 1960's patriotism.

Il Trumpolini took four months to issue his $1 million donation under duress...because everyone knows how difficult people in Accounts Payable can be.

When asked Tuesday whether he had given the money this week, Trump responded:

“You know, you’re a nasty guy. You’re really a nasty guy. I gave out millions of dollars that I had no obligation to do.”

Isn't that the the kind Presidential nastiness, personal insecurity and vendetta leadership the free world so desperately needs ?

The nice thing about Donald Trump is that we'll be witnessing his public meltdown without him actually being elected and we'll be able to enjoy his Nixonian quotes without him trashing the Oval Office.

Donald Trump future quotes after being 'schlonged' by Hillary Clinton in Nov 2016, as he prepares to enter the Bellevue Hospital Psychiatric Ward for emergency treatment of Acute Narcissistic Personality Disorder:

"People have got to know whether or not Donald Trump is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook. I inherited everything I've got."

"Always remember: Others may hate you. But those who hate you don't win, unless you hate them. And then, you destroy yourself. "

"As I leave for the psychiatric ward ... just think how much you're going to be missing. You don't have Il Trumpolini to kick around any more, because, this is my last press conference."
leslied3 (Virginia)
Alas, there is no treatment for personality disorders, narcissistic or psychopathic. No insight.
Entera (Santa Barbara, CA)
One can dream.
Kevin Rothstein (Somewhere East of the GWB)
There is very little Trump can do, except maybe murder, that will get his supporters to realize what a complete and total fraud Donald is.
Manderine (Manhattan)
No, even if Drumpf murdered someone on Fifth Ave, as he claims, he would still have followers. Sure they would follow him to prison, and watch his trial televised in a media circus. His defense, "They were a looser who was taking jobs away from Americans. I shot back in self defense to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN".
So murder isn't the way to stop his supporters, BUT, if he should murder someone, it would automatically disqualify his presidential candidacy in 2016.
GSS (Bluffton, SC)
Except that he said he could shoot someone on the street and people would still love him. (Sorry, I can' remember the exact wording of his comment). I am sure the NRA and its lackeys in Congress would still support him.
peterhenry (suburban, new york)
But according to Donald, (his words) he can go out and murder someone on the street and wouldn't lose any votes.
WT (London)
Bernie Sanders refers to himself in the third person too. Perhaps it's a strategy to appeal to those white men who are sick of non whites and non males having ambitions to attain powerful positions? Just saying!
Mel Farrell (New York)
London ?

Care to discuss the odious Camerson, and his familys' fortune, hidden in Panama, away from the tax man ??

What a con.
kingsmen (Columbus, OH)
So Trump claims to be worth $10 billion (with a B) and has a press conference to announce a $1 million donation to the vets ("I love the vets"). That would be tantamount to someone worth $1 million calling a press conference to announce a $100 donation. Imagine if all of those press conferences were televised! It's great that so many charities benefitted from Trump's efforts (huge!) but I suppose I like my philanthropists, like my war heros, to be a bit more humble.
I get it America, you are angry (and rightly so) and for many, you feel your white privilege and acceptance of ONLY your values slipping away (try opening your mind - consider that other people truly matter) but this is not the answer. This is shooting yourself in the foot.
John Galt (USA)
For you to complain that a man donates $1 million is insane! Be grateful. See the good. How much did Hillary donate??? Remember Benghazi
ptcollins150 (new york city)
Kingsmen, Thank you for this. It's right on the mark -- and quite funny!
Stuart (Boston)
I think it would be beyond hilarious if Trump releases his financial records and we all learn that the Clintons made more money bilking Americans after leaving office than Trump made turning around casinos and golf courses.

You can equate "The Apprentice" and its moneymaking effectiveness at some point to a Bill or Hill speech to a financial organization, and maybe to surprising effect.

Go Hillary. Full disclosure. Um, maybe not so fast.
Kevin Rothstein (Somewhere East of the GWB)
The Clinton's tax records are out there.

Ken Starr publicly praised all the good work the Clinton Foundation has done.

Trump will not release his tax records because doing so would show that he pays little, if any, income tax.
sharon (worcester county, ma)
The Clintons have released all their tax returns for something like forty years. All have been scrutinized, none have been found wanting. Let's talk conspiracy once Trump releases his.
p wilkinson (zacatecas, mexico)
But Stuart, the Donald did not turn around casinos, or universities for that matter. He flushed them down the toilet. He was rescued by banks and public monies how many times? He is a complete fraud.
ivehadit (massachusetts)
The reason he was so mad is that he was forced to write the check. It's the simple truth.
Nadim Salomon (NY)
Precisely.
Welcome (Canada)
It might bounce. Could the reporter from the Post check it out?
Mark Thomason (Clawson, Mich)
This is fair criticism of games around a claimed charitable purpose.

Let's be even more fair. How about the Clinton Foundation? How much charity there, set against how much self aggrandizement?

But let's not make this just about these two. PAC's, political action committees, are also supposed to be charitable public interest vehicles, not partisan tools of one candidate. Of course we know they are not, not one has ever been. The law isn't enforced because EVERYONE wants to break it, and does.

So sure, Trump couldn't be bothered to actually make the charitable donations he so loudly announced. Don't act like that is unusual in American politics, or in this race, or in every race that attracts a PAC.

Let's do something, at least say something, about money in politics and the details of how it is abused by all our politicians (except Bernie). But then, we'd be forced to praise Bernie in comparison to all the other choices. Can't do that, right?
serban (Miller Place)
The Clintons did put their own money in the Clinton Foundation. Trump did not put any in his "foundation". Did you actually find out what the Clinton Foundation has been doing before your usual knee jerk attack on the Clintons?
It is getting tiresome to see people who should know better compare Hillary to Trump. If you cannot see the difference you deserve Trump as President.
Janet Camp (Mikwaukee)
Oh please--just because I am not in the thrall of Bernie does not mean that I am some victim under the spell of an evil NYT plot to focus on other candidates.
ACW (New Jersey)
OK, let's say something about Bernie Sanders.
Sanders, who has also gotten into the habit of referring to himself in the third person, has not been 'abusing' money because up until now he's been a marginal figure. It is no virtue to be a virgin if no one wants to have sex with you.
However, in the twilight of a singularly undistinguished career on the fringe, Bernie Sanders suddenly attached himself to the Democrats, just as Trump did to the Republicans, to facilitate a vanity run. Let us contemplate how much money he would have raised for a presidential campaign if he'd been true to his much vaunted principles and run as an independent, rather than opportunistically jumping on the coattails of a major party. (Trump at least promised to finance his own campaign rather than rattle the tin cup, though, like all Trump's proclamations, it's collapsed when put to the test.)
You wanted to talk about Sanders. Be careful what you wish for.
Carolyn Egeli (Valley Lee, Md)
How ridiculous that this paper focusses on silly and inane Trump and ignores the candidate filling stadiums wherever he goes, Bernie Sanders. Sixty thousand filled one…let that sink in…and not a word here. Trump is such easy pickings for ridicule, it hardly seems fair. Not a word here about the truth of what's been happening..election fraud. It will be the elephant in the room, not Donald Trump, when those thousands of voters will not be dissuaded from their rights to have their votes legally counted come this July in Philadelphia. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! Because this election process has been so blatanly conducted fraudulently on so many thousands of occasions it boggles the mind. But no word about that here..oh no..let's focus on the clown in the room…nothing to see here….
Sarah (San Francisco, CA)
The a pretty simple issue with this argument that Bernie was robbed: Clinton has received millions more votes than he has. Under current election rules, Clinton is so far ahead that Bernie has no chance.

If Democrats used closed primaries, so the Democratic candidate was the one preferred by the most Democrats, Hillary would be *much* farther ahead. If every state used an open primary, so as many people could vote as possible, Hillary would still be so far ahead that she would be unbeatable. So how exactly has Bernie been robbed? In fact, he's only gotten this far because of the least democratic mechanism we have: caucuses.

He ran a great campaign and exceeded expectations, but he's *way* behind in actual votes no matter how you want to count.
Lynn (Greenville, SC)
If Sanders had received all the attention Trump received and Trump had been ignored to the extent Sanders was, we might now have an intelligent choice of candidates for Fall. We could vote, if not proudly, at least without shame.
DW (NY)
Sixty thousand packing a stadium is impressive, but attendance at a rally is still not a vote. The nomination goes to the candidate with the most votes, which thus far has not been Bernie Sanders.
Steve Ess (The Great State Of NY)
It's tempting to make light of Trump, but he is a real danger to the country and the world, literally the worst we can do. I think I'd even vote for (God help me!) Ted Cruz over Trump. He is not a "breath of fresh air" or a "needed corrective to our PC culture." He doesn't just "tell it like it is" because his tremendous narcissism blocks whatever native intelligence he possesses. He is SAD! and a LOSER! but our country is not and we will not choose him to lead us.
Larrry Oswald (Coventry CT)
Trump may be an unpredictable loose cannon but Cruz was the infamous ticking time bomb, more dangerous because of real conviction.
Rob Campbell (Western Mass.)
True charitable giving should be a private matter, or it be no charity at all, but credit where credit is due, he did raise/give over $5M from his efforts (whatever his reasons). He deserves more credit than he is being given, I say this even if humility was not on perfect display.

Too many people wearing blinkers here I think.
DMiller (New Jersey)
Please face it--the only reason he did it is because he was angry at Fox News for not capitulating to his demands so refused to participate in the debate. In order to take attention away from the debate (where viewers might have actually heard some policy proposals from the candidates instead of insults and might have considered one of them), he chose to have a fundraiser for veterans at the exact same time (knowing that the press could not help themselves and cover this more than any reasonable statements coming out of the other candidates' mouths). And--who could possibly criticize skipping something as "unimportant" as a debate for the nomination of the president of the US when that candidate was raising money for veterans--a group that we must venerate?
If Mr. Trump was so concerned about the veterans, why did he not do this before? Veteran problems have been ongoing since there were veterans. Why the sudden interest?
You also say that "true charitable giving should be a private matter..." I agree. However, this was far from a private matter. The fundraiser was done for selfish reasons and to get the most publicity for himself. He has boasted many times about how much money he raised and how much he himself gave. It did not seem to me that Mr. Trump was much concerned about having this be a private matter until the press started asking questions about where all the money went.
Too many people might be wearing blinkers, but not the ones you think.
Rick (New York City)
Credit where credit is due indeed. Donald Trump raised that money for veterans as a cynical publicity move to get revenge on Fox News and likely never intended to hand it over. He only gave in, with incredibly bad grace, after reporters called attention to the the fact that he had never actually turned the funds over to the vets. I credit the reporters who forced Trump to live up to his claims.
Paula (East Lansing, Michigan)
No one challenged the goodness of charitable giving. What they questioned was the actual facts--did the charitable giving take place? And that is what looks bad--he might not have ever gotten around to making those donations if the press hadn't inquired.

Taking credit for charity that never happens is too easy to believe of Mr. Trump. If he wanted this to be private, why all the noise back in January?
Anne-Marie Hislop (Chicago)
Gail, you crack me up. Don't forget that Trump equated going to a private military school to actually serving in the military. So, you see, he doesn't just love veterans (assuming one was never a prisoner of war aka a 'looser'), but he's one of us (I'm a Navy vet). Good to know.
John (Stowe, PA)
He "feels like" he served....even though he got deferments to prevent serving.
Jonathan (Buffalo)
I'm not usually a grammar NAZI but the word you were looking for is "loser" unless you were trying to make a point using the word "looser."
Jack Toner (Oakland, CA)
Gail I think you should seriously consider the possibility that Trump is on the verge of personal bankruptcy and that is the reason he's running for president.

He won't release his tax returns. He held onto the money raised in January, not to take it for himself but to use for a while to deal with cash flow problems.

His supposedly self-funded campaign is clearly not. He has loaned money to his campaign, no doubt expecting to be able to repay himself.

A friend of mine is currently being scammed. The scammer proposed a deal, paid out fairly significant money, then talked my friend into giving him valuable items to sell. He claims he's having trouble selling said items, has sold some stuff at deep discounts, now feels they need a real contract to finalize their original deal so he's stopped making the promised monthly payments & gets angry & offended to be asked for what he promised.

An honest person in such a situation, like say Trump with the vets' money, would realize that it did indeed look bad & would make a real effort to clear things up. The scammer acts the part of someone horribly offended at the lack of trust.

Hey Trump, show us the money!
Mark Thomason (Clawson, Mich)
A real estate developer is always on the verge of bankruptcy, by the usual standards of good business. It is massively leveraged, so the slightest setback will be ruin. That is where the profit it, and not just for Trump.

This is why real estate developers as a class are as crooked as used car salesmen.

People once asked of Nixon, "would you buy a used car from that man" but he wasn't a self proclaimed used car salesman. Trump is. That is his boast.

If you pick a real estate developer, you must in fairness judge him by the standard of real estate development, not "generally accepted accounting principles" or Business School ideas of good business practice. Although lately the business school models have been taking a lot from the real estate model, seeking ever-more massive rates of return on investment capital put into a venture.

So there is not that much to choose between Trump and Romney in junk bonds and refinance and financial games in politics. At least we don't know up front that Trump put his profits in the Caymans, like we know Romney did. Then again, we can reasonably assume that a real estate developer had other and better ways to avoid taxation, not that Trump paid that either.
Tim Mullaney (New Jersey)
The taxes will show his real income from his properties, which will let reporters and others calculate the value of the assets producing the income more precisely. He won't be worth less than $1B but may show he's worth even less than the $2.9B that is the low end of published estimates (the number is from Bloomberg). Either way, considering that he's working up from Dad's $200-300M stack in the 1970s, the returns are mediocre.
Mark Thomason (Clawson, Mich)
Income is only one aspect of real property value. Appreciation is another.

Profit can be longer term, not taken every quarter, and in real estate it often is.

That said, we know much of his list of properties now, even without a tax return. His wealth in real property could be calculated readily enough, with some time and expertise put in.
Max Alexander (South Thomaston, Maine)
Second time in a month that Collins has suggested Trump's tax return will reveal his wealth. So once again: the U.S. Treasury taxes income, not wealth. There is no line on Form 1040 to list net worth. We may learn a lot from Trump's tax return, but his wealth isn't one of them.
Carol K (Netherlands)
The 1040 doesn't require reporting of net worth; but I would be interested in seeing if he has filed a Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Assets). It has been required for several years and is used to report the value of interests or shares in certain Foreign partnerships, trusts, corporations, or estates if their total value exceeds certain thresholds. There are different thresholds depending on whether you live in the US or abroad.
slartibartfast (New York)
Once again, one can glean a lot from a tax return, most notably investment income, capital gains and dividend income, and can extrapolate whether Trump is worth $11 billion as he claims (not likely) or closer to $800 million or $1 billion (probably).

And not that I care but there are questions out there about how much, if anything, Trump donated to charity. A lot of people are looking into this and it's unbelievable what they're finding.
HT (Ohio)
While it's true that Form 1040 does not list net worth, you can estimate a person's wealth from reports on dividend income, rents, deductions for local property taxes, etc., which are listed on the 1040.
gemli (Boston)
We’ve got a candidate for president who may be suffering from an undiagnosed personality disorder. It will be interesting to see what will happen if he actually gets elected, because the pressures of the job tend to amplify the strengths and weaknesses of the incumbent. What if a candidate is nothing but weaknesses? What happens when the amp is turned up to eleven?

It’s impossible to contemplate. A candidate as flawed and unpopular and subject to ridicule among women, minorities, immigrants, you name the group, can’t possibly get elected. Except that every time Trump exposes another of his seemingly endless list of weaknesses, he prevails. It’s bizarre, like watching a 98-pound weakling with a limp making it to the final round of Ninja Warrior.

You would think his imperial castigations of interviewers, news reporters and judges would be a tip-off that he didn’t have the temperament for the job, even if his utter lack of qualifications hadn’t already made it clear. Even his veterans’ fund raiser was a spite-fueled reaction to a feud with Fox News. Now he’s irritated that he’s actually got to show us the money.

Is he hiding something? Because Trump dissembles even when he doesn’t have to, so it makes all of his statements suspect.

There may be an upside, though. At least if Joe Wilson shouted “You lie!” during Trump’s first national address, it would be a fair criticism.

Good call, Joe. And right on the money.
Mark Thomason (Clawson, Mich)
"We’ve got a candidate for president who may be suffering from an undiagnosed personality disorder."

We've got at least two like that, not just one.

Presidential politics seems to have been selecting for that, to judge by the other candidates.

And not just this year, see John Edwards or Sarah Palin.
Darby Fleming (Maine)
His followers don't care. Because what he says and does is exactly what they want to say and do.
MVH1 (Decatur, Alabama)
It's more like Jabba the Hut instead of the 98 pound weakling making it to the final round. He's far less sympathetic than the 98 pounder.