Perfect Nails, Poisoned Workers

May 11, 2015 · 690 comments
Patti (Utah)
I'm done. Never again can I sit across from the mousy, submissive worker who exudes graciousness for my visit to the salon--this is so sickening. I have seen the abuses, belted out in Vietnamese, sounding very,very scary and mean--then eruptions in giggles, as though mandated after chastisement. All along, the clients sit dreamily (after all, this is a "pamper myself" thing)...usually, either blissfully unaware that the fingers connected to the hand that holds theirs have begun to shake, or, a client might playfully ask the women "what are you saying to each other?" to which the worker responds with some funny analogy or story. Her eyes tell the different story. Now I know why the pregnant manicurist who I used to see at a quite well-known salon here is gone. Did her baby die? Was that story too much for her to hide and she was fired? All I know is, she was pregnant, she had a baby, she was in her 20s, and now, she's gone.
And so, my friends, am I. Never again will I pay into the demise of others' health. I feel guilty and ashamed.
lula (baltimore, md)
It’s a tragedy that our society puts money and financial gain above anything and all else - even ones health. Are the government agencies to whom we pay to protect us simply a mirage and we’ve all been duped ? Or have said agencies just been so well-greased by the pharm/chemical companies who produce these hazardous products or by the politicians/lobbyists who pay to turn a blind eye on terrible working conditions? Any business is good business, right? Well, only if you count the chimney sweep business of 100+ years ago who died of black lung by age 30, than yeah I suppose so… (/sarc). There’s something really wrong with this picture.
jim (LA)
So sad these women have to suffer just because lazy, priviliged, women won't do their own nails. I mean how hard is it to cut your own freeking toenails.
It would stop if all do their own nails.
MGTOW (THE SUBWAY)
How about women just stop going to these places.
Mark Schaeffer (Somewhere on Planet Earth)
It is important to regulate, inform people about hazards and close those shops that do not follow regulations. But, stop blaming the customers. Customers do not know. They are going to these places to help these immigrant women stay employed and earn an income in a dignified way. Manicure is no different than getting your hair cut or moustache trimmed regularly. Nobody thinks manicure is a luxury. I know a man who gets his fingers and toes trimmed from a salon because he cannot do them himself because of his tremors. It is the salon owners, and the companies that sell these toxic cosmetic products, that you must blame. Not the customers you dufus. Many of such salons in Florida are owned by doctors and wealthy people. They exploit workers and they con customers. I had a second degree facial burn, yes a facial burn, over a simple facial for my birthday. The facial was not done properly by a worker who was not trained or supervised, but hired at a minimum wage by a doctor owned spa. He made money both ways: exploiting workers and conning customers. I ended up having to spend thousands for recovery for a $ 60 facial with no help. So...what's your plan? Help lawyers make money...while the customers who have been conned, and who supply the money to keep these women employed, are blamed. These workers are going to end up on welfare, back on the streets or in prostitution...unless huge compensation comes for them. Put the blame where it belongs.
Marie Parker (Maryland)
I read the first article, and I must admit I am shocked. I have been frequenting the same nail salon for 15 years. When I began, the owner was there regularly. They are all Vietnamese. Now the owner has 6 shops and I rarely see him. Many of the women have been there the whole time I have been a customer, others for a substantial number of years. Tips must be paid in cash and each usually has an envelope full of money. I cannot believe that they are experiencing the kinds of conditions you describe. All speak English; they do not appear to be mistreated. It may be trite, but they seem happy. One of them was recently married; she showed me her wedding album. If she were as poorly paid as the women in the article, I cannot imagine that she could have had the wedding she did. I am really disturbed by what I read, and I really would not continue to be a patron of the salon if I felt such conditions existed amongst them. I hope all states and the U.S. Department of Education will look into the nail industry and take appropriate action to protect these workers.
Carol Colitti Levine (Northampton, Ma)
Cannot imagine that hair dye (die) also has the same impact on workers.
http://thesidetrek.com/2012/04/18/hairdie/
Frances (McGuire)
So many blaming government regulatory agencies. Budgets for government regulatory agencies , yes our tax dollars, continue to be cut, cut, cut because apparently that's what you, the electorate want. Who do you think enforces safe ingredients, environmental standards etc. etc.? You have to vote for policies you believe in otherwise it's a free for all because that unfortunately is human and or corporate nature. We are capable of better than that.
Christina (S)
Having a manicure for me is stressing releasing, not really about the color. The toxic chemical involved with diseases mostly are serving the purpose of coloring and shapes.
Wondering if there is anyone questioning about the chemical products that supplied to the salon? Can we improve the regulations on the ingredients?
lelectra (NYC)
Anecdotal evidence? Read it again, Steph.
Stefanie (New York)
If the intention is truly policy change and not frenzy, it would be wise for the NYT to include public health specialists / epidemiologists as co-authors on these articles. Anecdotal evidence loosely associating health morbidity to occupational hazards (eg, a manicurist developing breast cancer 10 years later) means less than nothing scientifically and gives industry lobbyists more "bad science" ammunition.
JoJo (<br/>)
I hate to be a downer, but Who is in charge of this Food and Drug Administration????? Why can't we elect a President who will enforce the laws, get rid of these chemicals, put all the Nail Salon people in Prison and deport all these illegally resident foreign nationals who are basically slaves in this country?? These Republicans are using their filthy lucre to prevent justice that a Democratic President would handle easily. Just listen to what the Democrats have to say about decency, the rich following the law, Justice for the People; fairness for minorities, etc., etc.
Wait, What? A Democrat has been President for over 5 years? Oh, never mind....
GirlProgeny (NYC)
I was a customer and user of these services for more than thirty years, long before acrylics became so popular and it was very, very clear then and now that these chemicals are dangerous. All you have to do is walk by and get a whiff. I warned every person that did my nails that they were in danger due to their exposure and recall a very urgent conversation with one pregnant manicurist. I really wanted her to understand the risks though I knew it was likely that her circumstances dictated her need to work there. At the time I was concerned about my own exposure but would rationalize that an hour twice a month was min mail, despite the headaches from the fumes. I never bought my children there and warned other patrons that they shouldn't either.

I once had an interest in the business and paid for private application lessons; I was told then that the acrylic product we were using was the only one considered non-toxic and even then I was sure that it was indeed toxic. It's truly sad that in this country the only thing that matters is a business' ability to make money risks and morals be damned.
SCA (NH)
OK--so we'll install exhaust fans in all these establishments. Where do you think that polluted air will be vented to? Urban air isn't toxic enough?

Of course it is true, as some commenters note, that we are all consumers in one way or another of bad products made by slave wagers.

But we have to start somewhere to reduce the consumption of unnecessary products made with dangerous chemicals, in industries employing the exploited.

Of course, shut one door and other will be forced open. Enterprising people will always find a product or service that can be cheaply produced or rendered, and will find an endless stream of the impoverished to work for them.

Unless we shut the door. As other commenters have noted, we have all the laws on the books already--but no or little enforcement.

An article in today's paper speaks of the imminent collapse of the NYC public hospitals network because of the insupportable burden of providing unreimbursed care to illegal immigrants ineligible for insurance. So let's add up how much money these high-risk pregnancies, care for miscarriages and the medical needs of damaged children have already cost NYC taxpayers.

People upset that their $10-$20 manicures will become more expensive are probably not ready to see their taxes rise even further to pay for the health needs of nail salon workers and their families.

Anything beyond clipping, filing and buffing is an unnecessarily polluting and toxic business, and needs to die an overdue death.
RachelL (Brooklyn, NY)
I have a question about the face masks some workers wear. Do they actually offer any protection against the health hazards of nail salons? I imagine they offer some defense against the physical hazards, like the dust from sanding and filing. But what about the chemicals? I doubt there are studies about their effectiveness against the chemicals found in nail salons specifically, but what about more generally? Can face masks ever protect users from chemical fumes and so forth?

The whole industry should be overhauled so that there are no toxic substances regardless, but I would still like to know if these masks are actually protecting the workers, or just offering a false sense of security.
Lin Kaatz Chary (Gary, IN)
This won't be a popular comment, I'm sure, but I have little patience anymore for everyone who says, "Oh, this is so sad!", "Oh, I thought there were laws!" , "Oh, why isn't the government doing its job?" ad infinitum. How many of you even know that there's been a huge battle going on RIGHT NOW in Congress over the effort to reform the laws that govern toxic chemicals in the US? And that this battle has been going on for years, with the chemical industry - led by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) to assure that as little progress as possible is made? Not many of us because the Times and most other media give it scant coverage - it's far from sexy enough and you wouldn't pay much attention anyway. Until a series like this and people ask "Why are chemicals like these (and all the others we're exposed to) even allowed?" You already know the answer. But although the ACC and their Congressional minions are powerful, you have a lot of power too: where and on what you spend your dollars, what candidates you support, the questions you choose to ask, the issues you force them to discuss. Is there really anyone who is actually surprised by this article? The message of this series is to open your eyes, pay attention and do something. Find a group and volunteer or donate; make a quick phone call or email a legislator, write a letter to the editor. Fight back and stop being mindless clients. You can be sure those beautiful tipped nails are just the tip of the iceberg.
SCA (NH)
Lin: Your comment is popular with me...
Leon Levine (NYC)
I'm glad to see that Gov. Cuomo is taking steps to protect nail salon workers, however these problems have been well known for many years. The article succeeded in bringing widespread attention to the plight of these workers many of who are immigrants. The article neglects to underscore that the problem is amplified by the fact that many workers are immigrants and may not speak English well. They may work under the books, be undocumented and non unionized, be afraid to complain to the employer or to the authorities. These workers may not informed about their rights with regards to OSHA health and safety protection and wages. Many salons are small and may have fewer than 10 employees exempting them from having certain written OSHA programs such a chemical hazard communication program. Surgical masks that nail technicians often wear are not intended for protection from volatiles organic vapors. Also, OSHA enforcement in the nail salon industry has been absent. In 2014, OSHA inspected only 2 nail salons in all of New York and New Jersey and 8 nail salons nation wide. OSHA inspections of nail salons have steadily decreased over the past 5 years. Manufacturers of nail products need to eliminate toxic ingredients from the formulations. The manufacturers need to accomplish this voluntarily or with regulations from the federal government. When the manufacturer claims that their product is non toxic this claim needs to be verified by a third party. Leon at ecothinkgroup
Tri Phan (Alexandria, VA)
My wife came down with lung cancer and passed away 2 years ago. We also had a few miscarriages as well. She was a non-smoker. She worked in a nail salon for about 10 years and had stopped. Her lung cancer came about 3 years after she stopped working in the nail salon business. I think there were other factors that affected her but I believe the nail salon business was probably the key source of her illness.
Secrippen (Bath, NY)
i was a nail tech for approximately 20 years in Rochester, NY. I didn't work at the rate that some of these Asian women do, but when I was booked I worked 45-50 hours/ week, no lunch, no breaks. Time was money.
In late spring, 2006, I was diagnosed with multiple meningioma--benign brain tumors. The first thing I asked my neurosurgeon when I was given my diagnosis was whether or not my profession had anything to do with my developing the tumors. He never even looked up from his paperwork--he simply said," No." And I've never been able to find a link. But I'll always wonder.
I had a craniotomy and Gamma Knife surgery, and every scan since has been clear. But I've never been back to nails again, either.
mdieri (Boston)
Is there any reason that acrylic artificial nails shouldn't be banned? That would at least remove the worst health hazard and leave plenty of options for beautiful nails. And require nail salons to have ventilating (suction) fans at stations where gel polish is applied - many of the better salons have these already, for the clients' sake I'm sure, but they also help protect the manicurists.
James Repace (Bowie, MD,U.S.A.)
There are several fundamental problems in the Case of the Poisoned Nail Salon Workers. One is that the Occupational Health & Safety Act has a cost-benefit test built in that weakens enforcement. This is Congress's fault. Another is that chemical safety standards have been set as a consequence way too high, so that while they might protect against some acute hazards, they fail to protect against chronic diseases. A major problem is the lack of ethical standards by cosmetics manufacturers and nail salon businesses. The industry PR people are redolent of Big Tobacco.
Colenso (Cairns)
Those who work and teach in the beauty industry are usually clueless about chemistry. In the 80s, I taught physics at Tottenham College of Technology. I was passing the open door of one of the many hairdressing classes, when I heard one of the lecturers in the Department of Hairdressing and Floristry gravely informing the female students that acetic acid came from lemons. I thought I ought to tell him that he meant citric acid when I next bumped into him in the corridor, but that moment never came.

He was a decent man, concerned and committed to his students, who had left school at fourteen or fifteen, trained to become a hairdresser, done quite well then turned to teaching his craft at the local college.

Most customers who get their nails done are rich or well to do women, most of whom evidently also know next to nothing about chemistry – otherwise they wouldn't expose themselves so recklessly. If the New York regulators don't do their job properly, then who is going to ensure that no women are exposed to dangerous levels of acetone etc?

With acute and chronic exposure, all these chemicals are capable of damaging the tissues, and causing one or more cancers. Instead of worrying about unnecessary mammograms, women would be better advised to reduce their exposure to all unnecessary chemicals in their pursuit of a plastic beauty.

Well done to the NYT for exposing here a real and genuine threat to the safety of all women, rich and poor, young and old, of all skin colours.
fahrrad (Brooklyn)
What is amazing is the utter neglect this issue has experienced from governmental agencies, such as the Department of Health, OSHA, and the FDA. Is it not their job to prevent such horrendous effects on workers' health and such rampant abuse and exploitation? Anytime I walk past such a place, I almost keel over backwards from the stench. It is hard to believe anyone would actually enter voluntarily, and it is an absolute scandal that these places are legally allowed to exist. Thanks for addressing this. Shame on the people who collude in all of this by frequenting these places.
amv (nyc)
I studied fine arts and worked with many chemicals, from acids in printmaking to heavy metals in oil paints. We were often warned by our instructors to take safety precautions and use proper ventilation. But there was one area we were advised not to dabble in at all if we could help it, because it was just too dangerous, and that was working with plastics. Several artists have suffered grave health consequences from working with plastics--one can look up a biography of the very talented Eva Hesse, who died young of a brain tumor. Acrylic nails are sculpted plastic, and acetone is an industrial solvent. Manufacturers should not be allowed to sell these products colored with pink dye and packaged in innocuous, feminine bottles, as nail polish remover is often sold. The same warnings should be required on these products as you would find when you buy paint thinner at the hardware store.
yahillwe (California)
My manicurist of over 15 years died of lung cancer, it was very quick, less than 3 months. She wasn't a smoker. But she had one silicon breast leak and I think with all the other fumes it just killed her lungs. RIP Monette.
Helena (New Jersey)
Polished and artificial nails are not just a health hazard to manicurists. They also trap bacteria. Health care workers, such as nurses and physicians who wear polished or artificial nails pose great health risks to their patients and have been implicated in several healthcare associated outbreaks. When I was a nursing student 30 years ago, no one was allowed on the wards with polished or artificial nails. Today, those rules are lax, and I frequently see healthcare workers wearing them much to my dismay. No healthcare worker wearing nail polish or artificial nails should be allowed to care for patients--especially in an era of increasing antibiotic resistance.
lelectra (NYC)
Yes. I recall several years back when babies were dying mysteriously in the natal ward of a major hospital and it was finally traced to at least one nurse with long laquered nails.
Saul Chen (St. Louis)
I wish all journalism had the level of quality that this series possesses. Thanks and well wishes to the author.
Jeff (Tbilisi, Georgia)
Exposure to acetone and isopropyl acetate can cause a false conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The body converts acetone to isopropyl alcohol, which is indistinguishable from ethyl alcohol (found in alcoholic beverages) in breath testing. Worse, at high concentrations, isopropyl alcohol can kill you.
DW (Philly)
In addition to labor issues, immigration issues, and workplace safety, this touches so many things. It's sobering to me that there is so little basic feminist analysis of the situation. In addition to women exploiting each other, we're exploiting ourselves. The money sunk into this is outrageous, and for what? Why are women's finger- and toenails somehow objectionable in their natural state, but men's aren't? All of the women here insisting that because they're "professional women" (unlike nail salon workers), they "must" have high-grade pedicures and painted toenails in order to wear open-toed shoes, I ask, don't men show their (literally) unvarnished finger- and toenails in public?

Take a look around in public today if you're unsure: men don't paint their nails. Granted men also do not wear open-toed sandals in corporate boardrooms. Women are still on display. Women often show their legs at work, men very very rarely. We can count the exceptions on one hand - lifeguards? Men generally go to work or out in public without painting their faces, removing facial or other hair, and they can let the hair on their head go gray without being gossiped about ("Why doesn't she just color it?") or losing traction on the career ladder. Basically even very high achieving professional women are still expected to present themselves as sex objects to a much, much greater extent than men.
Colenso (Cairns)
You make some excellent points with which I wholly agree. It's a shame you end with the passive voice: expected by whom exactly?

I have never expected the girls and women in my life to dress in a certain way, to apply make-up, to perfume or shave their body, to wash or cut their hair just so. Indeed, when I have tried to encourage my wife and adult daughter on occasion to relax their exacting dress standards a little when they go out, they have assured me that the other women around them would make bitchy remarks about them behind their backs if they were to do so.

The nastiest bullying my daughter ever experienced at college was from another female who didn't like the fact that my daughter was petite and pretty and dressed nicely. The most vicious bullying my wife experienced at any of her many jobs was from her female co-workers, female supervisor and female boss at an indigenous college at which she taught for many years.

In my view, therefore, it's a cop-out to blame here some vague, anonymous, amorphous society. We need to accept that many women and girls all too often terrorise, browbeat and bully other women and girls - without any encouragement, prompting or inducement from men or boys.
LauraC (Milwaukee)
As a female I support your comments 100 percent.
expat from L.A. (Los Angeles, CA)
The "job-killers" are at it again ... with their proposals that the gub'mint step in and (horrors) REGULATE all those wonderful "job-creators" who: use toxic chemicals (used in fracking for natural gas, as plastic microbeads that go into toothpastes and soaps then the waste stream and end up inside the dead bodies of ocean life, or in animal feeds that go that same route; demand fair pay for a day's work; enjoy cut-rate federal taxes for their investment gains, and so on.

Can we just retire the term "job-creators" because so many of them are more like plantation-owners getting wealthy on the backs of everybody else, An investor can rent a space and furnish the equipment and hire people, but the real "job creators" are actually those people who show up and DO the work.
Notafan (New Jersey)
Every woman who uses these places needs to announced loudly and clearly:

I won't be back unless the owners fix the problems here. Here is the tip, it is in cash, I am giving it to the manicurist, don't dare take it from her. Here is her share of the fee, it is in cash, don't you dare take it from her."

Will they do it? Nah almost certainly not.

I for one will not compliment another woman on her nail color without asking if she knows how much someone else paid for it, body and soul.
Lisa Evers (NYC)
..and I suppose you know where all your clothing and electronics were made, and under what conditions?
CarolT (Madison)
Oh whoop-de-doo, another "glorious" media "health" crusade - which means, a compendium of malicious anecdotes, in the likeness of a medieval witch hunt, whose real aim is nothing but emotional manipulation of the audience. Most of all, it's so that the media lie-spewers can masturbate their egos pretending to be public saviors! The subsequent lack of benefit to their supposed beneficiaries is not the media's concern. The media actually prefer that public policy is based on fraud and pseudo-science, so that's what it's based on (e.g., fraudulently blaming formaldehyde for nasopharyngeal cancer caused by Epstein-Barr virus, so they can hysteria-monger that formaldehyde is a carcinogen). Frankly, if people abused their Second Amendment rights the way the media abuse the First, they'd have their guns taken away. Not even the NRA would defend them. The media are the worst enemies of all truth, freedom and justice, and they ought to be punished for their lies and 'disarmed' in the name of the public's right to good government.
Jody (philadelphia)
Don't stop your medication.
LostinEurope (Germany)
The article immediately blames nail products, yet there is no discussion that other environmental or genetic effects could contribute or the cause. How many of these women smoke? Are the bedrooms where up to 12 of them sleep in a confined space, free of mould?

Take the discussion on nail polish. The so called "toxic three" ingredients have been in nail polish since the 1930's. How many billions of women have applied and worn nail polish since then? Who has met anyone that got sick from nail polish? Where are the statistics to show that these ingredients cause illness? This same comment was apparently made by Doug Schoon who you interviewed, but you decided not to publish his full comments.

While it is true that it is possible to place cosmetics on the US market without prior testing by the authorities, that is not possible in Russia or other CIS countries where all cosmetic products have to be tested by the government laboratory and an approval certificate given prior to sale. In Europe, which as you say is more regulated, it is necessary to provide the authorities with a Product Information File which contains, among many other things, a toxicology report produced by a European laboratory. When a cosmetic manufacturer produces a new product, they surely design this to meet the legislation in all markets - which in most cases exceed the US regulations.
DW (Philly)
"The so called 'toxic three' ingredients have been in nail polish since the 1930's. How many billions of women have applied and worn nail polish since then? Who has met anyone that got sick from nail polish? Where are the statistics"

While I agree that we need statistics to be sure, there is obviously genuine reason for alarm. When you ask who has met anyone who was sickened by nail polish, remember you are talking to New York Times readers ... likely to very few recent, non-English speaking immigrant women in their 20's.

Sure, many women paint their nails, but that takes about 15 minutes maybe, once a week if you are really fanatical about it. That is a very, very different level of exposure compared with exposure to multiple open bottles of nail polish for 8, 10 or 12 hours every day, 5 or 6 days a week, for years on end. (In a poorly ventilated space.)
LostinEurope (Germany)
Let's be clear, this article and the follow up "Perfect Nails, Poisoned Workers" is very specific to budget nail salons, that as we know exploit the workers. The workers are trained by the owner, who may or may not be a registered and trained Cosmetologist - which in many States requires 400 hours of education. The workers almost certainly do not have the required licence.

It is also highly probable that these salons are using nail products imported from China and sold through Asian wholesalers in the US. In some cases these salons are known to fill US brand name nail product containers with low cost imported products to fool their customers.

Like home cleaning products, hair salon products and other chemicals used in a variety of industries, there are guidelines to use. If you used an oven cleaner for 12 hours a day, six days a week without rubber gloves and good ventilation, most people would not be surprised if they developed lung irritation or skin dermatitis.

Nail product manufacturers, OHSE and organisations like the Nail Manufacturers Council provide guidelines for use. This includes wearing nitrile gloves, face masks, disposing of used wipes in an air tight container under the table, and either a ventilation system that extracts air to the outside or a 3-stage air filtration system that removes most dust and chemical vapours from the working zone.

These budget salons follow none of these guidelines, so no surprise that people may be getting ill.
Nightwood (MI)
Two interesting and enlightening articles, especially the 2nd one. What i would like to see next is an article on shampoos. We all shampoo our hair at LEAST once a week, usually in the shower. What is that doing to us?
NVFisherman (Las Vegas,Nevada)
This is a well written article. How can the nail polish industry get away with these toxic chemicals in their products? It is a shame that nothing has been done to remedy this situation.
Cave Canem (Western Civilization)
How many different gov't agencies ignored their mission responsibilities while this type of sweatshop has developed: the use of toluene in a consumer product, the FDA; the use of aromatic chemicals in a public place without adequate ventilation, OSHA; abusive labor practices, state and federal Labor departments; use if immigrant labor without appropriate work visas, ICE; underpayment of wages owed, state Labor department; withholding of passports and other human trafficking abuses, ICE; racketeering by salon owners, FBI, Justice department, IRS; underpayment of taxes, IRS; movement of funds obtained from illegal activities, FBI, FINCEN, IRS; etc. etc. etc.
tiddle (nyc, ny)
I'm surprised no lawyers have come forth yet to help these manicurists start a class action lawsuit against the industry. Without the threat of exposing further health issues to its wider audience of end users (and not just the manicurists and pedicurists), the industry will never change.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Professional manicurists who have a state registered cosmetology license have known about the problem of budget nail salons for years. They know they use illegal products, that they use unsafe sanitation such as using the files and tools across multiple customers potentially spending infection, that they are not professional educated or licensed. The problem is not that there are not regulations or even that there is a good part of this industry which is highly professional and safe, but that the authorities don't carry out enough inspections and stop malpractice.
Bruce Price (Woodbridge, VA)
I'm not surprised in the least.
Chris (10013)
Much like the drug user who keeps dealers in business, every person who goes to salon should feel responsible for the harm that they are doing to the women who do this work. The fastest approach to overcoming an industry's reluctance is to not patronize them.
Jane K Lewis (Lexington MA)
I never thought that painted nails were good looking. Just someone's way of showing they could afford some "luxury." Using the products from even pharmacies was not fine--the stuff smelled poisonous. It hurt your fingers. I'm talking about the 50's.
Later when I worked in the big city and walked by all these new nail salons, in warmer weather they had the doors open, and the awful odors were very strong, almost choking, on the sidewalks; what was going on inside the shops? No ventilation! Couldn't imagine how to work in such spaces, never mind patronize them.
Another writer has suggested file and buff--I agree that's the best. And you can do it yourself.
This is abuse of a vulnerable labor force, and it should stop.
Bismarck (North Dakota)
I think I have gotten my nails done 4 times in my life and will never do so again. This is awful and for what? Pretty fingers and toes?
JMY (Virginia)
I rarely used to get my nails done due to fear of germs and chemicals in the nail salons that pop up on every corner and in every mall. But when a natural nail clinic opened near me in Richmond, VA about 10 years ago, I stopped in to see what they were about. No gel nails, no acrylics, no heavy chemicals, no fumes, period. In as much as a manicure or pedicure could be 'natural', that is what they offered. I was impressed, and have been a loyal customer for all these years. They have a great staff who are treated well, and I am happy to tip them well. Are they more expensive? Yes, but you get what you pay for. A mani is $24, and a pedi is $55. But the shop is exceptionally clean, they don't exploit workers, and I don't have a fear of picking up an infection here. This is an industry whose growth has been fueled by cheap labor, which has led to poor (and hazardous) working conditions for its workers (and its customers, on the hazards front)). My salon is the exception instead of the rule. They continually strive to use the best products with the least harmful chemical profiles--so it can be done. There is a price for this, however, and like most Americans spoiled by cheap goods produced by cheap labor, American women don't want to pay what this service is worth. That such hazardous and exploitative salon conditions have been allowed to proliferate in this country is shameful.
NI (Westchester, NY)
This heart-wrenching, sad realities that manicurists endure should give the women who go to salons to get pampered a long pause. If women think that their beauty is enhanced by painted talons, nothing could be further from the truth. They are UGLY! Period. With their disdain, dissatisfaction, with a sense of entitlement and superciliousness, they don't realize ( maybe they do ) how atrocious their behavior is. There is no empathy for the women at the other end. For the manicurists it is a life or death situation literally.They are damned if they do. damned if they don't. Quit your jobs is easier said than done. A typical catch-22 situation. But many changes can be made to make life easier.First, give them at least a minimum wage. Second, give them tools to protect themselves. Third,( most important ) bring in OSHA and strict regulations with regards to dangerous chemicals and limits on hours of work. Fourth, penalize salon owners who are greedy vultures taking advantage of helpless prey. Fifth, the customers should not humiliate these women who are in a desperate situation. Let them trim your nails but avoid the paint. Shows real class and beauty. Last, leave a huge tip for their work of art. It will allow them to have a proper meal or buy a quart of milk. A little kindness, respect and humanity goes a long way. For the customer it is only vanity but for your manicurist it is life.
Surviving (Atlanta)
Thank you, thank you, thank you for this very important series of articles. I never got manicures until about 5 years ago - felt like I was treating myself to a small threat every so often. To learn that this is a practice threatening the life of my lovely manicurists and their children is devastating and I will no longer go. I'm so sorry for them as I want to support these women. Also devastating to learn that their employees are cheating them out of fair wages. I hope that these exposes change the nail polish industry for the much, much, much better. Until then, I won't be back.
JoanneN (Europe)
But do go back to tell the owners why you won't be going back!
mc (Nashville TN)
I rarely get my nails done; but I think from now on, I"ll never get them done. I was particularly dismayed by the rate of miscarriages and damaged children born to these workers. This breaks my heart.
sa (ca)
Thank God for this reporting. None of us need to go to these nail salons. If we boycott either they will close or the industry will have to change. But really, I don't get it. I am a middle class, professional woman who has never had a pedicure in my life. I have had 2 manicures in my life. This is a bizarre new habit that has arisen, I guess, to make some women feel empowered and special at a terrible cost for other women. Just stop it.
EM (Tempe,AZ)
Very very sad...NYT you need to have more articles like this one...Important for everyone to know...
swm (providence)
This type of journalism is so crucial. I was walking to lunch with three women yesterday, and one said that she needed to get a manicure and the other two heartily agreed. It's rare that I'd gasp and say they couldn't because of the info in this article. But, it really made them think, and the woman who brought it up has not gone to get a manicure. Thanks to the Sarah Maslin Nir and NYT for seeking and providing this information. It's actionable, and we all need to do our part.
Casey (New York, NY)
As a boy, I can't say I know much about nail salons. I am always concerned, though, for the very common smoke breaks the manicurists take....seems a scary combination, all the acetone, aromatics, and combustion products...
DJS (New York)
The parts of this series and the nasty comments which target the women who patronize nail salons, are misplaced and will do nothing to help the workers who are being abused and sickened.

How many of you ,who are making snarky comments regarding women who get manicures and pedicures at nail salons,and blaming them for the abuse of these women,do not own ONE product that has been manufactured in China or elsewhere,employing the use of slave laborers?

One?Do I hear ONE person who does not own a single item that has been manufactured overseas?

How many of you have written to your representatives in Congress,to voice your objection of to the legality of the inclusion of toxic chemicals ,not only in nail polish,but in shampoo,cosmetics, food packaging, FOOD,, particle board, home insulation, and items that we are EACH exposed to every day, that are prohibited in many other countries,or to rally for tariffs places on foreign goods ,which enable companies to manufacture in the United States, in order that the jobs that are being done by slave laborers be done by well paid Americans?

Anyone?
DW (Philly)
I haven't read all 690 comments (or however many there are by the time this posts ...) but I don't think it's so much a question of placing blame for the abuses of the industry. I'm sure most would agree the problem has multiple roots. But yes, there's an aspect of women exploiting each other, and for such a ridiculous purpose. Irony.
Larry linstrom (Columbia)
We knew a family that had their own nail shop. The fumes were so strong and I told him that he needed ventilation especially since the children were in that shop for hours on end.
I work around chemicals isn't a MSDS required? Aren't some of these chemicals used in auto body painting shops and aren't they required to have ventilation and the workers required to wear respirators?
Self regulation of an industry when did that happen? Why is the FDA intimidated by the industry they are overseeing?
LostinEurope (Germany)
Yes, it is a legal requirement for the nail salon to have a MSDS for each cosmetic product they use. As you know, the Material Safety Data Sheet contains information on the ingredients, risks - such as irritation or flammability, how to store the products, emergency contact numbers for advice, etc.

It is also a recommendation by OHSA etc, that proper ventilation is installed. Although not all nail salon products that produce chemical vapors also produce doors, if you visit a salon and notice an odor that is a good sign the ventilation is insufficient. In Sweden, it is a legal requirement for every salon to have adequate ventilation and the salons are inspected. Unfortunately, Sweden is the only country in the world to have this legislation - something which all responsible and professional manicurists have been asking for.
CRM (Washington D.C.)
I stopped painting my nails when I was pregnant; I didn't want to expose a vulnerable fetus to harsh chemicals. But it changed my thinking about personal products overall. Why would I put something in body that was toxic? Too little in the beauty and cosmetics industry is regulated. Look at cosmetics, moisturizers and shampoos; I can't even pronounce 90% of the ingredients. Some high-end cosmetics products are derived from petroleum. How is it legal to put this stuff on our bodies, when the skin absorbs almost all?
Ally (Minneapolis)
Just a quick comment about masks. Many people assume that the little cloth masks that we see manicurists wear are protecting them from chemical fumes and toxic dust. They are not. The only thing that will stop a chemical from entering the lungs is a well-fitting respirator. You know the ones, they have cartridges on the sides and look vaguely military. Filtering facepiece respirators (dust masks) rated N95 or better will stop particulates like acrylic dust and nail filings (these look more like a regular mask, sort of pre-molded with a little valve). Cloth surgical masks are not made for either of these purposes and should not be worn as protection. Proper ventilation in the workplace is the best line of defense.
LostinEurope (Germany)
The best is to use a ventilation system that extracts the air from the working zone to the outside, or use a professional 3-stage filter system that is capable of removing visible dust, invisible dust and chemical vapours. The 3-stage system we use that is manufactured in Sweden, removes 99.95% of all dust and chemical vapours from the air - we need to replace the internal filters every three months.

A good ventilation/filter system doesn't remove the need to wear nitrile gloves, or clothes that cover the skin, but a mask then isn't required.
Wessexmom (Houston)
As if any of those masks are at all comfortable. Do without acrylic nails!
tedj (brooklyn, ny)
I wonder what role we, the consumers play in this race-to-the-bottom pricing structure?

And not just in nail salons, how can a slice of pizza cost only 99 cents in Manhattan?
LostinEurope (Germany)
This is a good question. If you go back 30 years when nail salons first started, it was a luxury service with prices to match. What happened since then is that budget salons, typically operated by new immigrants, dropped prices causing many professional salons to go out of business. The problem is that many of these budget salons are simply not safe, either for the workers or the customers. State laws exist so that it is mandatory to use a new nail file for each customer and to only use freshly sanitised tools (like cuticle pushers, nail bits for the electric files, etc) - but the budget salons don't do this and risk cross infection.

Pedicure chairs are the worst - few are cleaned and sanitised properly so germs grow in the water pipes under the chair. Health inspectors would look at the pipes using fibre optic camera's - but very few salons are inspected and so bad practices can continue.
SCA (NH)
Wherever did I get the peculiar notion that my own hands were made for meaningful and pleasurable work--like caring for a child; peeling fruit and vegetables so I could prepare a delicious meal; gardening so I could restore my soul; touching someone else with love and compassion; illuminating a history with paint and embroidery and the written word.

All I need to prove my hands are beautiful is a nail brush and soap and water, and a good rubbing with nice lotion. At the end of a day, and a lifetime, I want my hands to tell everyone who I am.

Your hands are telling everyone who you are, too.
DJS (New York)
No,people’s hands aren’t “telling everyone who you are ,too.”

There are wonderful women who are humanitarians, philanthropists,
work in soup kitchens, are mothers who care for their own children, cook and bake,garden,paint and do all the things that you do and more,and get their nails manicured.

The only thing your hands tell anyone about you is that you don’t care for nail polish.
Eddie (anywhere)
Thank you to the author Sarah Maslin Nir -- this is so much more important, more thoroughly researched, and better written than yesterday's vapid article about the Kardashian family.
klm (atlanta)
This is a wonderful series. But in one article, it was suggested the customer interrogate the manucurist about her pay. Great way to get a service worker fired, if she talks about her pay and someone overhears, she's gone. If you have your nails done, tip massively. I tip hugely because I've had a lot of service jobs. Once you've done it, you don't forget, you understand what they're up against, and you tip big.
Surviving (Atlanta)
I've waitressed, my sisters have waitressed, so I tip big everywhere and whenever I can. I hate seeing people tip their pedicurists especially a buck or two. Shameful. I also don't agree that the manicurist should be put in the position of revealing what he or she makes. The owners should pay their employees a fair wage.
AJ (Midwest)
Wow. My daughters do their own nails. They both are pretty skilled. Their nail creations are elaborate and Pinterest worthy. I never thought they also avoid contributing to this exploitive industry.
Mike Moultak (Napa,CA)
This is another example of a much larger theme: a lack of regulatory oversight with regard to worker safety and consumer health and well being. How is it that 1300 chemicals are banned from cosmetics in Europe while fewer than a dozen are banned in the US? How is it that they have found a way to protect their citizens while giving the consumer product companies an opportunity to compete and thrive in their market place? It is obvious to anyone paying attention that this originates from endemic corporate and trade group lobbying and the shared libertarian/ conservative rant complaining that there is already too much regulation here. Isn't this the same clan who complained when automobile safety, emission and fuel efficiency standards were adopted? Haven't they lead the opposition to virtually every single piece of legislation to protect our air, water and land? Well, since they have a consistent record of being on the wrong side of history one would think it's about time they come up with a fresh strategy. The results are in: time and experience have proven that strong worker, consumer and environmental oversight improves quality of life and economic outcomes.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Europe is much stricter. In addition to banning more chemicals, every nail product manufacturer, importer or national distributor has to register on a central European database and supply a Product Information File for every cosmetic product to be sold in any European country. This PIF contains a lot of information about each product that is essential for the medical authorities in case of an incident - including a toxicology report that must be produced by a European laboratory. The manufacturers, imports and distributors also have a legal requirement to monitor the safety of the products in the field and to report to the authorities any possible health issue.

Having said this, any product manufacturer is going to develop nail salon products that can be sold in all international markets. So US product manufacturers will develop nail salon products that meet all European legislation.

The problem is that Chinese factories may well not follow the same process. It is very likely these products which are being imported and used in budget salons, as the products are significantly cheaper. It has also been reported within the industry, that some of these salons fill the cheap product into well known US brand name containers to fool their customers
Jeannette M (Long Beach CA)
In answer to someone's question in what Asian languages the article is available, from left to right Korean, Chinese, followed by Spanish. What is missing is Vietnamese.
Here in Southern California most of the nail salons are run by Vietnamese.
Many are outfitted with luxury business-class chairs – a huge investment I'm sure, and the workers are clustered around on low stools.
My Taiwanese friend jokes that her colleagues don't recognize her outside of the office because she isn't sitting on a low stool.
I do my own nails, not because I can't afford the advertised $20 (some as low as $12) for a mani-pedi, but because I'd rather spend my money on my NYT subscription and new open-toed shoes.
thank you for this series of articles ;o)
LostinEurope (Germany)
The problem with these luxury pedicure chairs is that they are difficult to sanitise, and few salons do this or do it well enough. They are one of the major causes of cross infection in nail salons, the others being re-use of files (each customer should receive a new file) and not sanitising the metal tools with each customer.

Many quality nail salons now either use a dry pedicure process, or separate foot bowls with disposable liners.
S.L. (Briarcliff Manor, NY)
It is amazing to me that supposedly intelligent women cannot do a simple thing like take care of her own nails. There should be no need to cut or push back cuticles. They belong where they are to protect the nail. If you never start these ridiculous procedures your cuticles remain unobtrusive. Nail clippers and nail files are all that is required to trim and shape the nails. Applying polish may take a little practice but it is hardly rocket science.
Caring for your feet is really easy. Get a pumice stone and use it for about ten seconds on each foot every time you shower. Afterwards apply a little lotion. If you start just when you begin wearing sandals you will not get that ugly build up of dead skin that they remove with a blade, which I think is actually illegal. It's even easier to put polish on your toe nails because you can always use your dominant hand.
When you smell the chemical stench coming from these salons, it should be a warning that they are dangerous places. It should be obvious that it's unfair to expect anyone to work there so you can feel pampered. Even if the workers were paid better it is still an unsafe job that you wouldn't want your daughter to perform. Why is it all right to expect some other woman to risk her health and that of her children for you selfish needs. Once a week at home with your nail polish is really different from forty hour a week exposure. Being a big tipper is not enough to soothe you conscience.
rockyraccoon (Rhode Island)
Ridiculous. This whole manicure/pedicure thing is insane. Women want to be taken seriously but they spend hundreds of dollars and countless hours of what could be productive time getting their nails done. I have never understood why anyone would paint their nails, even though my mother always had long, perfect nails, it just strikes me at the most pointless kind of grooming. And indicative of a person not at ease with themselves. desperate to fit in, who can't find anything more productive and worthwhile to do with their time and money than paint their freaking nails. Argh.
E (New York, NY)
I've almost always done my nails at home myself, mainly to save money, using nail polish brands like Essie and Opi. Thank you for this informative article, as it has brought my attention to the fact that even so-called higher-end brands cannot be taken at face value. After doing a little research I've discovered that these brands are not toxic-free. I will be shopping for toxic-free polishes from now on.
Paying Attention (Portland, Oregon)
Nail salons, paint and floor finishes, chemicals used in furniture manufacturing, fracking, internal combustion exhaust, the ubiquitous plastics in our environment: pervasive negative health effects are an obvious consequence. The contrary assertions of industry lobbyists are no more persuasive than the obscene assertions of tobacco company CEOs concerning the lack of evidence supporting the conclusion that smoking is addictive and harmful.

But our government will not get in the way of corporate profits. And we as a people are too consumed by material mania to care. We want more bling, cheaper throw away stuff and unlimited access to fossil fuel to support our empty lifestyles. Oh well, when it's time to pay the piper, it will indeed be quite ugly.
lrbarile (SD)
I noticed patterns during my career in oncology and one that showed up was folks who worked in nail salons and dry cleaners being prone to blood cancers. Also, folks who lived under power stations being prone to brain cancers.
ellen (L.A., CA)
I worked in a salon as a hairdresser for one year. There was a manicurist who worked there and every time she did nails, I left the building. After a year, I quit. It wasn't hard to see that those chemicals were dangerous. There simply is not room anymore for people to be so ill informed that they believe that our government is regulating on our behalf. You have to take care of yourselves and that means research. There were already lots of warnings about how these chemicals should be used and the first thing it says is that they should only be used in areas that were well ventilated. I have yet to see a salon that makes that scenario available to it's workers. Wake up, girls. Learn a different trade.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Are you aware that working as a hair stylist also carries a higher risk of developing cancer? Hair salon products are not perfectly safe either and OHSA recommends suitable ventilation - just as they do for nail salons.

Nail salon products are safe - if used correctly and the recommended precautions taken. You simply cannot compare budget salons who exploit illegal immigrant workers, who don't speak English and received no professional education or license, with the professional nail salons that exist in this industry.

Reading this article you would think all salons are like this and all products used are dangerous. This is simply a massive exaggeration of the facts. The truth is if you want to pay $18 for a manicure, you are risking your health. No-one can work for this time at this price. There are very many professional nail salons in the US, and many people who visit budget salons are well aware of this, but they are not willing to pay a higher price.
Diana (Chelsea, ME)
As a chemist - I would never allow myself to be exposed to these solvents. All work with harmful solvents and volatile compounds must be done in a hood to protect the worker.
It doesn't seem like it would be difficult to engineer a table-top sized air handling hood to protect both the workers and the customers - a hood that was properly engineered could handle both the volatiles and the particulates that are created by filing. Then of course - the workers must also wear gloves - something that even Subway sandwich engineer workers do - seems protective of both the worker and the customer.
Why is this a difficult problem to solve? Oh wait, I know - it would require money investments into the business. Can't have that, can we?
LostinEurope (Germany)
Diana, nail salon extraction and recycling filter systems exist and are recommended by the OHSA and the Nail Manufacturers Council - professional salons use them. Budget salons that exploit their workers, quiet possibly use illegal imported Chinese product, don't practice safe sanitation as is the State legal requirement, are not going to pay for professional extraction/filter equipment.
Jenna (New York)
People say hands are woman's second face, so the prevalence of nail salons is not surprising. But I only do my nails for occasions. It's tempting to work in the nail salon by the time I neded to make ends meet as a financially struggled new immigrant, since it's relatively common to earn 100-200$ /day. However, taking into consideration that its potential harms to health. I hesitated. I wish we infuse more meanings into the definition of beauty---at least it should not be established upon the sacrifice of others' health.
Fiddle2Pie (Los Angeles County)
This article has been published in Korean, Chinese, and Spanish; and that's fantastic. It really is. But I have relatives who are immigrants from Vietnam, and they work in the nail polishing industry. They understand English, but I'm sure there are many who don't. Is there any way we can have this article translated into Vietnamese?
bythesea (Cayucos, CA)
I get a pedicure once a month. My manicurist owns the shop. She is the only person there doing this type of work. It costs me $50 but I think I'm safe. Having read this article, I am worried about her. She currently has a skin rash.

Why don't companies that peddle this poison spend their time improving the product, read changing the formulary so that products contain safe ingredients...rather than lobbying for the right to continue to sicken people? Wait. I know the answer. I may have to rethink my pedicure. A message needs to be sent.
LostinEurope (Germany)
You should recommend that she visits a dermatologist and has a patch test done to determine the cause of the rash. I would guess that she doesn't use gloves and may not have an adequate ventilation system. Both are recommended by the OHSA, nail product manufacturers and industry organisations like the Nail Manufacturers Council.

Like hair salon products, some nail salon products, regardless of brand quality and price, do contain chemical irritants. If you day in day out with these, without adequate protection, there is a risk of allergy or asthma. Too many manicurists - even those that do practice good sanitation - risk their own health because they feel gloves are uncomfortable and a good ventilation system is too expensive (in reality these cost around $1K. probably less than they spend on nail art products each year).
HB (Texas)
I never get my "nails done." I can't stand the fumes emitted from just walking by a salon. It's sad that these women can only make a living at the expense of their health & fertility so well to-do women can have fancy nails. Like many jobs where there are dangerous chemicals & micro particles as in car manufacturing etc. However, you see these workers typically using facial masks & with more ventilation. There must be more regulation.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Smelling fumes is a good sign that the salon is not professional. Professional salons will use air extractors or air filtrations systems that eliminate any fumes.
SCA (NH)
Can we now put cheery slogans like "Sisterhood is Global" on the trashheap?

In a long life--starting out as a girl, and advancing to womanhood--I've learned what we all learn eventually--other women are your worst enemies.

It always bemused me, how many of those grand "feminist icons" of the 20th century were busy stealing other women's men when they weren't writing and proclaiming manifestos.

How far have you come if in order to feel "professional" and "confident" you need a perpetual servant class to groom you to some imaginary level of perfection?

When I founded a women's center overseas in a place notorious for repressive, even deadly patriarchy, I found that other women constantly tried to thwart our achievements and local men were our best friends.

The comments here--"really, I didn't know..."

If you needed the New York Times to help you figure out what an exploitative and dangerous sweatshops looks and smells like, then you shouldn't have bothered with that fancy degree you're still paying for.

And if you won't acknowledge that the problem begins in these women's home countries, with cultures more exploitative than ours, then this can never be solved. You imagine that people coming from civilizations much older than ours aren't capable of thinking for themselves? Their bad choices are their own responsibility.

But we have our responsibilities too--not to support industries that poison everything essential to life.
Lisa Evers (NYC)
First off, women can't 'steal' other women's men. Men are grownups who are responsible for their own behaviors, and whomever cheats on their mate, it is their own fault (and not that of the other party).

Secondly, men who get their shoes shined each week... are they too creating a permanent 'servant class' of workers who toil bent over, and using noxious polishes? Do you know where all your clothing is made and under what conditions? Do you know the working conditions of all the workers who picked the fruits and vegetables you eat...or of the fishermen who spend all day on the rough seas to catch your fish...of the blue-collar construction workers who build our homes, etc?
BB (NYC/Montreal/Hawai'i)
Thank you NYT for bringing on social awareness and showing the world vanity is costing lives of the many that have no choice but to take what they must just to survive. Let's hope we all try to assess the effects of what we do.
Clarity333 (Atlanta)
So it makes me think about nail salons in Europe and Australia. Are women there happy with their less toxic nails? Do aestheticians manage to produce beauty without killing and injuring their workers? This is a good follow-up story for Ms. Nir & NYT. Does the difference account for a gap in profitability compared to the U.S. nail industry?

Is it pure laziness or greed that keeps American industries resistant?
LostinEurope (Germany)
It's not a nail paradise in Europe or Australia either - both have budget salons that don't practice safe sanitation and use illegally imported products from China that do not comply with the local cosmetic laws. In the UK, I know there have been multiple instances of police raids on salons and illegal immigrants found.
Optimist (New England)
Why do women have to wear these toxic things to feel more confident about themselves? This is a very sad report. Why do we allow capitalism to take over human lives, born or unborn?
MikeM (Fort Collins,CO)
I wonder if there is a difference between the nail-painting rate of mom's with autistic kids versus the others. That'd make a whole lot more sense than that silly vaccination idea.
Bob Garcia (Miami)
Who knew that nail salons were such a big deal? Is this a NYC phenomenon, a big city phenomenon, or are they widely used across the country? I couldn't even tell you where there is a single one in my area, though I suppose I drive by some all the time.
NG (OAKLAND, CA)
Wonderful series, well done, NYTimes! After reading both parts, it's become glaringly apparent that this is contemporary feminist issue. These shops began to proliferate in the 90's as I, and the rest of my generation was transitioning from young adult to full-fledged grown-up. I believe that it is OUR generation (Gen X + Gen Y) that hold the lion's share of responsibility for encouraging this industry – as the largest demographic who seemingly unquestioningly consumes and patronizes inexpensive nail salons and beauty products. Millenials are taking OUR cues, and following suit.

The values that we hold, as a society of now middle aged women, are largely progressive and feminist. Even the conservative women of this generation can appreciate the need workplace standards of fairness and equality. But it seems we have failed as consumers in the area of beauty. We (women) spend an excessive portion of our paychecks on beauty products, cosmetics, and beauty services. We are falsely convinced that we "need" it in order to look "the part" or "feel confident". But really all it is doing is draining our pocketbooks while having a disastrously negative impact on a largely female workforce.

We, the women of Gen-X, need to take a moment and reflect on our own consumerist patterns so that we can set a better example for younger generations. Don't look the part, ACT the part.
Youmustbekidding (Palmsprings)
Amazing that these issues have not been addressed and corrected. Very sad and wrong!!

On another note: I wonder how many of these "specialist" have negligently exposed fungus infected tools to their customers.

Hmmmmm?
SCA (NH)
I wonder who has managed to convince my supposedly intelligent, modern fellow women that one cannot be respected if one grooms oneself...

Several commenters have insisted that a professional woman cannot dare be seen barelegged in open-toed shoes without a paid-for pedicure.

Seriously.

If you live in fear they're going to mock you in the boardroom because you've done your own toenails, then you haven't achieved anything I could come within lightyears of respecting.

This is the equivalent of the "lady" who needs the maid to lace her into her corsets or hand her her nightgown.

You *can* care for your own personal bodily grooming without being an object of contempt. But again, this is really women setting a ludicrous standard for other women and then being ready with the knives to eviscerate any independent thinkers.

I spent my entire working life in NY as an executive secretary to the powerful who met with the powerful, among colleagues who wore silk dresses and expensive suits, and I wore black jeans and nice tops. Didn't make my bosses happy but I made clear I expected to be judged by my work.

And if you are in a position of power--which I never was--you can certainly set the tone.

But these comments about *must* are just feeble excuses from people who need a justification to pay for a silly service. At least have the guts to say you do it because you want to.
S. (CT)
Bravo to this.
umassman (Oakland CA)
This is just so terribly sad. My wife gets an occasional pedicure (4 times a year perhaps) at local salons - a habit she never had until later age when our daughter talked her into going with her and now it's something previously enjoyable that they do together sometimes. Fortunately for the manicurists, I guess, she is a fingernail biter so no manicures ever! But if people stop going to salons and paying for these services, there will be thousands of unemployed nail workers on the street with few alternatives to support themselves. What are they supposed to do? Go back where they came from? I doubt that they can so what's the alternative?
mikenh (Nashua, N.H.)
The point is that many of these workers should not be here in the first place.

Because, what does it says for a nation that claims to be a beacon of enlightenment, opportunity and equality when it routinely acts as an enabler for industries, like the beauty care industry, who are notorious for exploiting vulnerable and powerless workers workers as little more than slaves toiling in a sweatshop?
LostinEurope (Germany)
The alternative is that salon customers wise up and start to recognise the difference between a professional salon that charges a professional rate, and a budget salon that carries health risk for both the workers and customers.

Choose professional nail salons and the budget salons will be forced to change their practices. All the regulation in the world won't change anything - there will never be enough inspectors and despite the tone of this article, the health risks are low enough to not gain a higher level of attention from law makers.
Ed911 (NC)
You would think that the US government would step in and enact some sort of protective legislation. But, after you realize that it's he who has the most money, and therefore the most politcal power, that you begin to understand that our politicians are for sale...

No one in DC (read politicans) wants to rock the boat. They all care more about getting rich and establishing a legacy employee conduit for their family, than helping the common man. And, yet we vote these idiots right back into office year after year after year.

Don't complain here, if you don't vote. Better yet...get out and become and activist for what you believe in.

The most effectivce activist...lobbyists. They show up on the door step of congress with promises of money, support, favors, all for just a little help with their issues.

Let's face it...our government is for sale. Band together raise some money...hire a lobbyist...and pay for what you want. That's the only way you'll get things done to your satisfaction and in a timely manner.

Have a good day.
LostinEurope (Germany)
They are ignoring legislation! They are hiring illegal immigrants, paying below minimum wage and exploiting them. Some may be guilty of human trafficking. They are ignoring the State law that each manicurist should hold a Cosmetology licence, ignoring the regulations that every customer should receive a new nail file, and ignoring the laws on tool sanitation!

What is missing is implementation of the existing legislation, not more laws.
93read2 (Boston, MA)
I wonder why this article is not published in Vietnamese, in addition to Spainish, Chinese and Korean, given that the majority of nail salons in the US are Vietnamese-owned and operated.
jj (California)
I used to work with fiberglass fillers and resins at my job. I wore a respirator and gloves as I knew how dangerous these chemicals and solvents are. Other industries that use such products are policed by OSHA. Nail salons and beauty parlors don't fall under OSHA's jurisdiction even though these businesses use products which contain many of the same dangerous chemicals found in places like auto body repair shops. I am horrified every time I walk by a nail salon where the door is open and I am assaulted by the all too familiar odor of acetone, acrylic filler, resins, etc. Often times there are children inside these shops! I see women sitting with their fingers soaking in bowls of acetone in order to soften acrylic nails so that they can be removed and new ones applied. Acetone is dangerous stuff! I see manicurists sanding and shaping the acrylic filler that has been applied to clients nails and everyone is ignorantly inhaling the dust created in the process. The Food and Drug Administration and local health departments have failed to protect nail salon workers and their clients. Perhaps it is time to let OSHA have a crack at them.
Mary Kay Klassen (Mountain Lake, Minnesota)
Obviously, there needs to be either, mandatory gloves and masks worn that are designed for the types of work that manicurists do, or else eliminate the jobs altogether, although that would put the entire industry, including the manufacturer of nail polish out of business. If it is toxic to the manicurists, then is it toxic to those using the products at home. Since, I only have received one or two pedicures a year in Minneapolis, usually from my daughter, where the manicurists are well paid and well tipped, I know little about the industry pay scale nationally.
SBC (San Francisco, CA)
If the industry is going to change we, the consumer, will have to make them change. It's more expensive, but the few times a year I get a pedicure, I go to places that don't smell like open bottles of nail polish remover and polish. Check out Yelp, read the reviews, look for salons that use products like Zoya natural nail polish. They really do exist. You and your manicurist will be healthier and happier in the long run.
A Reader (Detroit, MI)
While there is nothing "natural" about nail polish, I agree that Zoya is a good brand. Others are Rescue Beauty Lounge, Deborah Lippmann, Butter London, and Jenna Hipp. All of these are so-called "high end brands" and are not inexpensive. But you do get what you pay for. If you walk into a salon and you can smell nail polish, acetone, or chemicals used in hair color or perms, turn right around and leave.
mikenh (Nashua, N.H.)
Better yet, stop giving excuses and do your nails yourself.
Bill (Fairbanks Ranch, Ca)
Nail workers of the world unite! Throw off your oppressors and get a job plucking and gutting hormone and antibiotic laden Chickens for a big poultry processor, or picking strawberries in the 100 degree heat and pesticide fog of the Imperial Valley.
josh (LA)
"But a 2010 study by the F.D.A. and another in 2012 by the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Department of Toxic Substance Control found in random tests that some products, even ones labeled “3-free” or “5-free,” in fact contained those very chemicals."

Any legal action regarding fraud in the labeling?
Gardener (Ca &amp; NM)
After reading the comments and finding none expressing concern for those who wear the chemical acrylic nails, gel nails and so on, I wish to add that, overtime, the original, organic nails of the clients break down, become weak, pliable, brittle, causing white spots and ridging from reapplications, consistent wear. There is also an increase in bacteria build-up beneath the longer nail tips, bringing me to wonder where women wearing the applied nails may have unconsciously put their hands. For this reason among others, seldom does one see healthcare professionals who wear these nails. When I see women wearing salon nails, I am reminded of women friends who have shown me their deformed organic nails from repeated application of the chemically caustic synthetic nails, making any beauty the wearer may think they derive, negligible. This industry is unhealthy to those working in the nail salons, as well as to those who patronize their services.
Anne (Montana)
I wondered about this when I got my nails done for the first time for my daughter's wedding. I thought of the manicurists breathing that in day after day.

Also, in connection with the other article, my manicure for a polish (lacquer?) cost $40 and I tipped $10. It was just polish and took ,I think, 45 minutes. That seemed like a fair reimbursement to me. This was in Billings,Montana. I since decided that I did not have the time or money for manicures and I worried about the pregnant woman who did mine.

Thank you for these articles. I hope something is done to improve the working conditions- pay and fumes- these women undergo. I will read more on what can be done.
Stuart (Boston)
Without the benefit of having read all of the responses, two things should be noted. First, there would not be a nail industry without women willing to take advantage of the women who perform manicures and pedicures. Although the owners of the salons are complicit, it is the consumer who drives the beauty industry. And the primary consumers are women. Second, if there is an increase between affluence (or not) and manicures, it needs to be seen as one derivative of women going to offices and wanting their nails done professionally.

None of this excuses or changes the article, which is excellent; but we do this to each other. And we write laws and build government agencies to police the wrong things we do one to another.

Those who call humans inherently good miss the point: humans are inherently interested in themselves. Good is an acquired skill.
François Fiset (Burkina faso)
This is great journalism that picks up where politicians gave up.
LT (New York, NY)
Jus another example of corporate racism. Manufacturers of these products have been found to have lied about removing some of the harmful chemicals from their products. Lies. They know that those who run these nail salons are not young, white middle class kids. They know that they are primarily those "other people" whom corporate America does not care about and have little clout.
I used to wonder how can such company officials live with themselves and their families knowing what they do to make money. But therein lies the answer--it's right there in my question.
Miller (Ithaca NY)
My friend married a Vietnamese woman a number of years ago and brought her to the US. After a couple of years of of ESL, she began working in a nail salon here. She works 7 days a week, all of the hours the mall is open, no overtime, sick leave, vacation time, etc., and I have long worried that the working conditions were damaging her health. There are none of the safeguards mentioned in the article present in her salon. She carefully saves her money, sends a lot of it to her family, and is not qualified to do anything else here in the US that I can think of (she isn't young). She is in just the circumstances the article and other commenters describe. I concur with those who believe the FDA must do its duty and regulate these substances; and OSHA is also failing these people. It is very discouraging to see how paralyzed our safety agencies have become in this regard.
A Reader (Detroit, MI)
And your friend (her husband) is OK with this?
bluestar MD (NY)
hmm and where is the husband she married in all this? he apparently thinks it is fine she works 7 days a week long hours?
Lisa Evers (NYC)
"...My friend married a Vietnamese woman a number of years ago and brought her to the US. After a couple of years of of ESL, she began working in a nail salon."

Ah the irony. No word about your friend's also taking advantage...marrying a woman from Vietnam who spoke little to no English at the time, and taking her away from her homeland?
memosyne (Maine)
European countries banned lead in house paint in the l920's and 30's. The American house paint industry fought any government attempt to ban lead in house pain for 30 years, finally accepting a government ban in the l960's.
Lead paint tastes sweet: some children eat it. Eating one pea sized flake of lead paint will cause mental retardation in a child. I saw this in my medical practice. Note that Freddie Gray had mental retardation caused by lead poisoning. Old houses in old neighborhoods may STILL have lead paint.
Women should band together and insist that toxic chemicals be removed from all cosmetic products. They are not good for us and they are not good for our fellow-women. No large scale study has been done on an association between use of unsafe nail products or other unsafe cosmetics and breast cancer. We all support breast cancer research etc. Let's insist on research into nail chemical and other cosmetic chemicals.
Richard (Honolulu)
Congratulations to Sarah Maslin Nir and her assistants, and the New York Times, on this vitally important and ground-breaking story. She should receive some kind of award. It's a marvelous example of investigative journalism.

Two things stand out. One, of course: the economic inequality and extreme dangers of working in America's nail salons. Two, the fact that a NEWSPAPER, and not a government agency, is exposing a horrific situation that, for decades, has been in dire need of correction!
Let us hope that now something may be done. Without this story, I would guarantee you that nothing would be accomplished for a very, very long time to come.
Katherine (Guam)
It seems OSHA has been asleep! Although there is a lot of material on the OSHA website on this issue, it seems there has been little enforcement.
umassman (Oakland CA)
Perhaps they are ignoring the problem but in reality, OSHA probably has had staff reductions - there has been a Federal hiring freeze for over a year with no staff replaced at many agencies.
Drexel (France)
This is no surprise. My sister was hairdresser from the late 60's until her death in 2002 and she died of lung cancer. What is the toll taken by perms, coloring, etc? My first "husband" died at age 34 of lung cancer and he worked in photo display and merchandising. Both worked with materials rife with toxic chemicals and fumes. If you look at set design and builders,you may also find unusual rates of cancer from the toxins used.
Robert (Boca Raton, FL)
Real question, how is it affecting consumers, and especially concerning are the young girls who put this junk on daily? I have a young teen and I am concerned.
klm (atlanta)
Oh good. You're only concerned about your daughter. Ever gotten off your cell and looked at a service worker? I don't think so.
Martha W (NYC, formerly Boston)
Younger readers may not have heard of the classic expose of how the underclass in American lives: "The Other America" by Michael Harrington, 1962. Read it. It applies, still, today.
Gudrun (Independence, NY)
It is a scandal that the law governing cosmetics is from before WW2 long before plastics like acrylic were ever invented !!! lets all call our federal Senators and Congress Representatives and tell them to catch up with the standard set by the EU in Europe and tell them about this article and the 500 plus comments.
Toate Ganago (Tucson, Az)
One question, what happens to the original nails that God gave us? Greed and insecurity kill and destroy.
Harriet (Albany)
It is too bad these salons are not outlawed. Just as I always thought it was obvious inhaling smoke (including majahuana by the way) cannot be good for your lungs, just taking one whiff walking past one of these salons that have their doors open suggests they too are not healthy. Since the ones in shopping malls use the same ventilation system within the mall it means we all inhale the chemicals.
Lisa (Maryland)
Can we please stop castigating women who go to nail salons as "vain"?

I am a professional in Washington and it's well understood that in order to wear open toed shoes (necessary in summer) you have to have your nails neatly trimmed and polished. Manicures are taken for granted too.

Kudos to you if you can get that look at home.

Personally I would rather visit my dentist than any salon.
DW (Philly)
It may be well understood but it's still ludicrous.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
Understood by WHOM? Nobody is suggested you do not trim or sand your own toenails. Or even paint them if you like. This isn't rocket science.

It's nice to have a pedicure -- I do it occasionally, maybe 2 times a year -- but the rest of the year I care for my own feet.

Now, there are people who are handicapped or disabled, or too elderly to be able to bend over to do their own foot care, OR they have vision problems. But I mean here "healthy able-bodied women".

You act as if you were be shunned in some way if your toenails are not brightly colored. That is absurd.
RBenstein (New York.NY)
Ok, if not vain how about weak-willed? Sheep-like ? Conformist? Immature ?

What would happen if you showed up to work without polished toenails - you'd be fired ? That would make for a great lawsuit.
SMcBrideR (Kent, CT)
This is indeed an important article. However, it raises as many questions as it answers. It is hard to be surprised that the constant contact with the powders and chemicals would be safe for employees who work with them all day long. In the immaculately clean salon that I frequent, all workers wear masks, and the gentleman that does my gel manicure every 5-6 weeks is truly a gentleman. Is he at risk? If I move from a gel manicure to a "regular" manicure, am I contributing to a solution for him? Does it matter?

I feel this series of articles (rightly so) condemns an industry, but how can consumers make smarter choices to help to create a healthier work environment for all involved.

This situation reminds me of the first Bloomberg administration. Smoking in restaurants/bars was not banned for the patron's benefit. It was a work hazard for the staff. How can consumers who enjoy manicures, make smart choices to everyone's benefit?
Anna (CA)
For years, had the same feeling about nails , diamonds, silk and what was behind all the glamour, the story behind the story, now this once again proves, that we can not be just skin deep, with glass eyes, look but pretend we don't see or hear. in 1990 traveling to Thailand, friend of mine gave me money and asked me to buy few yards of fine silk for her, as a young 27 year old business women all I wore was silk blouses and scarfs, loved silk. But when in Thailand taking a tour of the silk factory, seeing with my own eyes, how the workers were treated, how the silk was boiled in front of us, and a young lady sitting behind the boiling pot all day, dropping the cocoons, and maybe getting paid Dollar or two per day. Afterwards I was suspicious of all those practices and anything came from that parts of the world. I never got manicure for years for the same reason, wondering if the workers, even if hey lived here in the US were also being mistreated, as often I would hear bosses yelling at them, not understanding a word of what they were saying, the fumes alone, also kept me away. last few years guilty of falling back, going to nail places every other month, I had become like anyone else, now thanks to this great report, once again we are reminded of the harsh truth of greed, lack of value for human life , well being and not wondering, people who do all those jobs for us, how they live! we do need to be aware , care and question, we are all humans after all. thank you NYT.
Richard (Honolulu)
On a trip to Guatemala, I visited a banana plantation which ships tons of product to the U.S. I saw children as young as 12 dipping bananas in a blue chemical bath. I'm not sure why they were doing this, but every bunch was processed in this way. The older women had blue hands--a permanent condition! How many Americans' consuming this very popular fruit are aware of this situation, and would they eat those bananas if they knew?
Anna (CA)
The only answer is certified organic bananas to avoid this procedure. they do the blue bath, which is filled with very harsh chemicals, to disinfect for transport and control the ripening process. most commercial bananas are also getting gassed once they arrive to the western mainlands for finishing the ripening process!!!
ECW (Redding, CA)
When wearing a mask is mentioned, I wonder what kind of mask people are talking about? The work I've done with dangerous chemicals requires a respirator mask, which requires filters attached (and does look very "hazmatty"). This is no doubt what would be required to protect the women who work in this job, but I am guessing that most would be wearing a dust or surgical mask, which not only doesn't protect the worker, but in fact concentrates the chemical in the mask. I can imagine why an employer wouldn't want their employees to wear such frightening gear as the proper, truly protective mask, in addition to the fact that the filters are expensive and must be replaced daily, but it is deplorable that these women are subjected to such a horrendous health hazard. And for these women's health to be so compromised by something that is so superfluous is mind-boggling to me. The behavior on the part of the cosmetics industry itself borders on sociopathic with its concern for profits over the well-being of its workers.
Rcp (nyc)
I applaud this article and hope it brings some change. I do think that it may be a bit misleading, however, and would like some clarification on whether there is a distinction in toxicity between the regular nail polish that most women get and the acrylic nails which I believe create and aerosolize far more harmful particles.

I don't know that mani-pedis will go away but there certainly must be ways to make it safer in addition to requiring that nail salon workers wear masks. It should be an OSHA violation to have salons paint nails without some kind of exhaust fumes mechanism that covers the hands being painted and those doing the painting.

Oh, and we need immigration reform so that illegal workers cannot be exploited like so many are in this industry.
Liz (Austin)
I have often wondered the same thing about people that work in our home or yard, doing painting, floor refinishing or even cleaning. I asked the owner of a painting crew and a floor installation crew about why the workers weren't following the protocols for using these chemicals and got a variety of answers. In one case they were not just not ventilating, but were actively taping plastic over my AC vent and the windows. They said it made the job "neater". With the floor refinisher, he said that he had proper ventilators in the truck but that the workers refused to use them because it made it harder to breathe. I later had the occasion to use one as a part of my job, and it's true. I think the solution is multi-faceted--need better equipment, enforcement, worker training, reformulation of coatings, etc. With regard to manicurists, there may be a regional difference, for years now, all of the nail techs that I have visited in either regular or high end salons or spas have used a fresh pair of disposable gloves from the moment they begin the mani/pedi. Hopefully this helps with skin exposure.
Lydia (Seattle)
This article is proof, once again, that corporate interests run this country. Our health, our children's health and our environment are in their hands, how absolutely terrifying.
Lynne (Portland, OR)
Absolutely obvious to anyone who has ever had her nails done in a modern nail salon that the workers are in danger from inhaling the chemicals used. If the state governments licensing the salons and the owners of the salons will not protect the manicurists by ensuring they wear masks and providing adequate ventilation and by warning them about the dangers of working in an toxic environment during pregnancy, the customers must do so themselves. Allowing another woman to put herself in harm's way for the sake of a set of artificial nails is evil. We must protect our sisters -- expecting others to do so is not an option.
J. Edward (Fort Lauderdale, FL)
The only time in my life I've ever been in nail salons, I was distributing pamphlets in retail businesses for a new adult ed center and I was shocked at how thick the smell of industrial chemicals and solvents was. It was over ten years ago and I still remember the feelings of dizziness and nausea after only being in them for a minute. I couldn't understand how anyone could work in one. By the time I got to the third one, I started skipping them. I always knew I'd be reading an article like this someday.
Metonymy (Pasadena)
You only have to walk into most nail salons to notice that something is terribly wrong. And yet people do it all the time. Why? Why take obvious risks with your health and fail to sense how toxic the air is people working in those places? I've been waiting for this article for a long time. Thank you.
Joan Anderson (New York, NY)
PLEASE! Just STOP THE MADNESS! Nail polish is a neuro-toxin. I'm tired of having sympathy for everyone (for example cigarette smokers and THEIR health -- instead of how it impacts on ME -- 2nd hand & 3rd hand smoke!). Same with nail salons. I cannot STAND walking past them. Most of the time they keep the door open for fresh air, which just pollutes MY air. Nail polish is a neuro-toxin. I don't want it. It's a free country. I'm sick of 'free country' meaning everyone gets to do what they want at my (health's) expense. Cigarettes/cigars, nail polish, too many cars/trucks/etc in the city. Why is it necessary to put that stuff on your nails and suffocate them? I can't worry about the health of people working in these salons. These salons have no business being in an over-populated city. I'm sick and tired of having my health impacted on for everyone's ridiculousness. How about having manicures without the nail polish? Please come to your senses, people.
Lydia (Seattle)
You "can't worry about the health of people working in these salons" ?! That is really your reaction after reading this article? Wow...
klm (atlanta)
I possess all my senses. They tell me it's all about you, Joan, and nobody else.
Rudolf (New York)
Embarrassing that this article is needed to explain Western women that nail beautification is bad. Same as having to explain that smoking or driving your car too fast kills you. Way back I started a relationship with a lady who was late for dinner because as she explained "I had my nails done and it took them forever." We broke up that same evening.
Greenpenno (Michigan)
I am amazed at the people whining on about cancerous nail products, as if this would be "news' that ANYONE - dry cleaning employees, factory workers, smokers, ay and all salon industry staff- as if they are not personally responsible for their choices of going into these places for these bizarre and unnatural body treatments. Meanwhile our rivers are cancerously polluted, by industrial waste and fracking, mining eviscerates our land against any possibioity of health, and widespread activities by Monsanto on the land complete the job. So who is "exploited " now??
SCA (NH)
If you really cared about the wellbeing of these people, youd understand that most of these salons need to be closed and their workers trained for the fastest-growing employment sector in this country--healthcare and its ancillary services.

Only a minority of salons are licensed, fully tax-compliant businesses with adequately-trained workers. The rest are illegal sweatshops with fraudulent books and ties to human traffickers.

Lets ignore for the moment the fact that these are mostly illegal immigrants who should not be working here at all.

They can be trained as home healthcare aides; as workers in nursing homes, etc. They could receive legal wages and benefits, and begin the journey towards the middle class that many of our families took. Their children would have the chance to attain higher education.

To suggest we just make these places providing a useless vanity service *safer* is to express a preference for a permanent underclass of docile servants who make ordinary women feel *rich.*
umassman (Oakland CA)
Thank you for making a constructive suggestion as a solution to the problem. Healthcare and elder care is an excellent alternative for those who are able and want to try doing this to make a living alternate to doing nails.
Sonora doc (Arizona)
Their docility and lack of other job opportunities often is the result of their bosses/owners preventing them from learning English. This contributes to the very low salary and dangerous work environments.
joe hirsch (new york)
Plain and simple the government is responsible for implementing regulations that protects these workers. Our system is so corrupt in allowing these industries to buy the lawmakers who are elected to serve the public and its welfare. Yeah, we're the greatest country.
quartz (california)
There should be a women's boycott movement to stop all nail polish vanity. It is absurd and a killer.
Jacqueline Tellalian (New York, NY)
I've never had a salon mani-pedi in my life, but I would occasionally paint my own nails if I was in the mood. About five years ago, I started getting lightheaded while doing my nails, but really thought nothing of it. A few months later, I did my nails again with a different color from a different company and I not only got lightheaded, but my hands started itching. I immediately removed the polish using an "all-natural" polish remover and tried to put on yet another color. Within a few minutes, blotches on my hands popped up. I quickly removed that polish too.

When I decided to look up which of the ingredients on the labels could've been causing my allergic reactions, I was pretty horrified to learn that all I had to do was pretty much just pick one - they were all toxic. Since then, I've tried "3-free" and "5-free" nail polishes, but they also gave me bad reactions, so I now just leave my nails alone. I spoke with my doctor who reminded me of two things: that allergies can crop up at ANY time and that nail polishes and their related products are nothing BUT chemicals and plastics, so buyer beware...
bokmal2001 (Everywhere)
I appreciate this series, but I would like to see some practical suggestions/solutions to the workplace issues discussed. For example, what would an effective HVAC system in a nail salon entail, and what would its cost be? Second, an earlier article in this issue pointed out that a significant portion of the salon workers are illegals. Why are not these owners being investigated, fined, and/or closed down for these violations? And so on.
Heather Ditmars (Oshkosh, Wisconsin)
Thank you for fleshing out this important topic about hazardous chemicals in nail products and proof of their harm to manicurists. It is both sad and infuriating that the cosmetic industry is blocking the FDA and congress from banning these toxic chemicals that cause such tragedy to occur in the form of miscarriages, cancer and skin and respiratory problems. I hope that as more reports come to light that the industry will be pressured to stop making such products as the public becomes more aware and educated about this important topic. In the meantime, I will not be supporting this industry or buying these products and will urge my friends and family to do the same.
Emily (Ohio)
Perhaps nail salons should be stand alone businesses and not part of the shared air conditioning of shopping malls?
Nancy Keefe Rhodes (Syracuse, NY)
Any industry that strenuously "resists regulation" should immediately become suspect.
Dean (US)
Where is OSHA? Where is the FDA? Where is the NY State Dept. of Labor? Why are these sweatshop equivalents so completely unregulated?
Aloysius (Singapore)
Great investigative reporting. Excellent job NYT. Please report more like this around the world.
AreYouSoLame (California)
I suppose this is "news" to some people? Like how smoking is actually "bad" what news to people?

Anyone who has walked past the open door of one of these nail places and hacked on the fumes escaping could tell you...it's not good to breathe in there! Do we really need a government study and an article in the NYTimes to tell us what we already know?

I'm not the mani-pedi type, but have walked by and walked IN before (dropping off & picking up an elderly neighbor who gets her nails done monthly) and you can bet that it was patently obvious that the air in there was foul. Noxious. Poisonous.

It's like sitting downwind from a campfire. You're wretching and coughing from the smoke while you munch on your s'more. Can't you tell that it's bad air?

It's sad that women feel the need to do this sort of work without proper precautions (massive fan/ventilation systems + masks + less noxious chemical products) but if people of both genders continue to think that women look "GOOD" with colorful, shiny nails, then shallow women will continue to get colorful, shiny nails. No matter what the cost to their own health, or the health of their manicurist.

Except for the young girls taken by their mothers, these are all in the category of what I call "consenting adults" engaging in risky behavior. When they wise up, maybe they will stop hurting themselves. Hopefully it's sooner rather than later.
sazure (NYC, NY)
Before you criticize this 1 example take a look in your household to see how you may be exposed to the very same. These toxic chemicals are both anesthetizers-sensitizers (they do damage to various systems, as the cell, system breaks down, it takes less+less chemical exposure to cause ever increasing "reactions" until that system collapses) In reality it is chemical injury-slow poisoning of the physiology. The only reason I am alive to write this was due to my decades long research in holistic/natural care. Most states do not have a Medical Freedom Act.

Search, toxins in perfumes, CIIN, Dr. Grace Ziem, Formaldehyde in your everyday products.

Background, biochemistry, chemistry of arts (art chemicals trickle down from industrial), statistics, BA Psychology (study of brain pathways) I was to obtain my MA at NYU in OT. I can not only read a MSDS (plus statistics to question their "results), but OSHA trade manuals, raw data research.

Many, who lost all, live in tents,cars. Perfumes, common products r made from "synthetic" petro based products. Many have died or commit suicide their plight ignored-the Pharmaceuticals (make many of these products - think Bayer Aspirin, Bayer pesticide) hugely control Government policies.

With a minor-Urban Affairs I can assure you that the various laws to provide protection are not enforced. No Gov agency did their job and exposures continued.
Gudrun (Independence, NY)
I am shocked that only 4 people recommended this comment. This comment points out that the rest of us who never use a nail salon are also at risk from this antique cosmetic law from before WW2 -- example-- check out products at the drugstore an you will find the common preservative is methylisothiozolinone and is nicknamed MI. This product was increased in content about ten years ago and people developed bad rash from it that was debilitating and hard to diagnose- dermatologists refused to learn enough about it and finally a report on Drudge Report stating that people in Europe were coming down with bad rashes -- Europe banned the product a couple of years ago but USA is nothing. Read about that scandal in the NYTihttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/24/business/allergy-trigger-found-in-many...
Luis (Mexico City)
I guess your comment could have been far better understood and appreciated by your fellow readers if less acronyms were used. At least that is my case. Just could not follow it and I have the impression that I missed something important. Regards.
nn (montana)
I have no understanding of why women do fancy manicures or false nails. It has never, ever, made sense to me. But no worker, no worker anywhere, should pay for their job with their body without health coverage, full knowledge and protective gear or equipment. No one. Period.
Susan Nunes (Medford, Oregon)
I never understood (many) women's fascination with long fingernails and manicures and pedicures. Frankly, I always found them dirty and disgusting. Cut the things off and file them yourself. Talk about a total waste of money.
Joseph (Boston, MA)
Allow me to amend my previous comment. It's not only the GOP that would block new regulations. Politicians from both parties are beholden to industry contributions that trump needed legislation. Just look at the unregulated supplement industry to see what I'm talking bout.
SHaronC (Park City)
The unregulated supplements industry PALES in comparison of the "regulated" industries that the FDA, USDA and other agencies supposedly regulate. Countless chemicals and food additives have been approved over the objections of the scientists on those committees or boards. These regulatory continually dismiss adverse findings from other 1st world countries. On the US money talks and the general public's health be damned.
alrighty (<br/>)
Many people are wondering how they can choose a nail salon that treats its people well. The reporter said she did not find any good actors in her investigation. The best option is not to get manicures/pedicures. But if you do get them, I would recommend that you look for nail salons employing only those of their own ethnicity (Korean salons with only Korean employees, Chinese salons employing only Chinese people, etc.). You're also less likely to find abuse where the owner is around the same age the employees. Lastly, never go to a salon where the person in charge is male.
me (mo)
I hope you win the Pulitzer prize for it and I hope changes takes place. The former will happen, the latter won’t! In any case, thanks for the attention paid to the new economic slavery. As a migrant myself, in the early 80’s I worked in similar environment, Ag Fields, and seen the devstating health impact. I hope one of the young Hollywood stars takes this cause!
Dan (Kansas)
Well, I wear my clothes like this because I can
And I wear my hair like this because I can
And I walk around like this because I can
and I do my thing like this cuz its who I am.

And if you're expecting me, to give you an apology for being nothing that you're used to
Well go right on ahead and wait, hold your breath and concentrate. Keep holding 'til your face turns blue.
My road, it ain't your road but trust I know (I know just where I'm going)
My flow, it ain't your flow but trust I know (I know just how I'm flowing)
I'ma do my thing (I'ma do my thing)
Please feel free to hate and complain
I'ma do my thing
Say what you like because this one ain't gonna change
I'ma do my thing
Orion (Los Angeles)
Lobbyists and everyone working to defend and circumvent the efforts to shed light and regulate the dangers in the chemicals used in this industry deserve bad karma. How do you do that to another human being.

Women who do their nails often, you are complicit if you do your nails at a salon which does not protect their workers, especially if you are being served by a pregnant woman with no protection. What kind of price will you pay for this level of inhumanity?
Ben (NL)
Some saddening facts .According to the W.H.O. [Environmental and occupational health] about 300.000 work related deaths in Europe {yearly}.
More information the W.H.O. site.
News ought to be known,however often not published by newspapers in print or online.
Exceptions : communicable diseases.
Recently: ebola.
Field workers are doing a great job![knowledge by experience].
lizzie8484 (nyc)
I'm heartened to see that the Times has published this article in other languages in hopes, I suppose, that it will go deep into these communities. Not sure I've seen this before. Thank you!
Henri (Chicago, Il.)
This is what cracks me up. So many of the people in major cities hate the oil/gas industry and fracking. Then they pollute, cause pollution and ignore pollution if it "beautifies" them. All the while the oil/gas industry, fracking is incredibly environmentally friendly. In other words, these intelligent people are really naive and unaware of the world around them and how it functions.
So take a look at the household fertilizer's for your plants, then about the unbelievable amounts of herbicides and pesticides that are use in and around your homes in the cities, the pollution that comes from make up, soaps and the amount of methane that is omitted from your bodies. Realize that you live in an organic and inorganic world of chemicals.
Rachel Fitzsimmons (San Francisco)
Public health workers have known about the adverse health problems of the chemicals used in this industry for decades, but it's hard to convince the cosmetic and beauty industry of the seriousness. Gloves won't prevent exposure via inhalation. The manicurists breathe very high levels of VOCs all day. It is a joke that they wear those completely ineffective filter masks in the Times photo. Just like the paint industry, they should have full respirators with VOC cartridges, or switch to materials that are not carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or toxic in any way at the doses to which they are exposed. In California, a few manicurists are not waiting for government to protect them and are voluntarily switching to less toxic materials. My home-manicured fingers are crossed that others will follow this path. Thanks to the Times for trying to elucidate an old problem.
Dezaad (Boise)
Why is this under the jurisdiction of the FDA? Why not OSHA?

In any case, the cosmetics people seem to me to be evaluating the effects of the chemicals on individual users as consumers. They don't seem to be evaluating safety as workplace resources. I am surprised that the author of the article didn't deliberately point this out.
K. G. (San Francisco Bay Area)
Everyone who posts that we should stop patronizing this industry is inadvertently advocating we take jobs away from the women who work at these salons. That's not the answer.

There are already safer nail polishes that are Big Three or even Big Five free--the industry term for not having formaldehyde, formaldehyde resin, toluene or camphor or dibutyl phthalate. We should be encouraging salons and salon owners to use these polishes instead, even if it means the cost of a mani/pedi goes up a bit more.

I don't get my nails done anymore but when I did, I brought my own "natural" nail polishes to the salon with me. It wasn't the answer for all these victimized workers, but it was a start. Be the change you want to see.
Onbeyondzen (Berkeley)
The answer seems easy enough to me. Forget about polishing nails. It's a stupid practice anyway.
Xtine (San Diego)
Why is the US government failing to protect its citizens? How could this possibly be such a poorly regulated product and process? This is embarrassing. Money and government too tangled up again.

Women (and some men) please boycott all nail products except those found to be 5 free and until there is some real response from the industry to remove these harmful chemicals and improve working conditions in salons. Acrylic nails are just dumb anyway. Those should have been over long ago.

Come on, this is an easy one!!!
Foxdog (The Great Midwest)
The nail salon my wife attends enhances her beauty while serving as a family business that drives these Vietnamese people's progress in higher education. One of her manicurists, for example, is studying engineering. Now, I've told my wife that her hands are beautiful as they are, but I wouldn't deny her the chance to feel feminine nor begrudge her the $40 it costs, out of misplaced compassion for smart people who work hard and know their business.
Kaydea (Chicago)
At what cost to the workers, who pay for that engineering degree? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Please read the article again.
Michelle (Chicago)
The woman studying engineering shouldn't have to work in a job where she risks asthma, chemical burns, or miscarriage, just to support herself while she goes to school. It's not misplaced compassion to expect that workplaces follow the laws, or that employees are paid fairly and their health is protected.
llj (NV)
Thank you for these two articles. After reading them, I immediately went online and ordered a nail polish which is 3-free of the dangerous chemicals.
I hope the beauty industry and those working in the sweat shops in the nail industry find a legal advocate to put an end to the horrendous working conditions.
CM (NC)
All of this for pretty nails! That seems an vanity and a waste of money to this reader who does her own nails, applying polish only for special occasions since even the work I do around the house, not to mention normal nail growth, ruins the effect quite quickly. Others have different preferences, however, and as several workers pointed out, they must continue to do this sort of work to make a living. At the least, they should have the same protection that others working with hazardous substances are afforded, i.e., chemical-resistant gloves, respirators and/or fume hoods or other chambers to contain the fumes, etc. If that increases the cost of a manicure, so be it. Long nails are unsanitary, by the way.

This seems to me a case of "this is the way it's always been done, so how can it be harmful?" Too many processes and procedures have been given a pass because their practice has become a tradition.
apride1 (boston)
NYT - Thanks for providing the articles in multiple language. Please note which Asian languages are available. Unfortunately, I cannot tell which is which and I want to share with workers at the nail salon I patronize. The women there are kind and friendly and make me feel better about my ugly hands and feet - I want these hard working people to be safe.
MS (CA)
The first is Korean, the second is Chinese and the third is Spanish. I hope this article gets picked up and reprinted in the ethnic media that these women are more likely to read (if they have the time/ inclination to read the paper). Agree with a prior poster that having a version in Vietnamese would be good too.

[Another point somewhat tangential -- working with some immigrant populations, I've noticed that some are not or barely literate in their "native" language so graphics/ spoken words/ or other means to convey info would also be helpful.]
Lola (New York City)
A one-bedroom rental apartment in my neighborhood averages $3200 a month while manicures from Monday-Thursday can be had for only $10. Figure it out. Kudos to the NYT for this series. It's now up to us to see that these manicure parlors are rated like restaurants. Contact your Council member and State representatives and demand changes now. BTW, unlike other retailers, there has not been one failed manicure parlor in my neighborhood although there are often two or three
shops on one block.
David Shaw (NJ)
I worked in the furniture restoration biz for years a few lives ago, handled all these chemicals and more, washed up after the day was done with acetone, sprayed lacquers, stripped furniture, chemical city! When I finally moved on my hair got wavy (again, I had forgotten, thought I had just grown up!), my breathing somehow grew easier (and I hadn't realized it had been slowed) and even my sex drive improved. It was quite a revelation realizing what those chemicals were doing to me.
What was coming on the market as I left that industry was water based finishes, excellent strong products with my less chemicals. Where are the water based nail polishes? Perhaps this article will spur some chemist to work on them, the science and technology are certainly there.
When my daughter is doing her nails or removing the polish it sends that awful smell throughout the house, she is now banned from doing it in certain areas especially when Daddy is around! Will show her this article, will stand over her as she reads it, need to make this sink in.
Helen Porshe (Pa.)
Well, that's it for me: no more nail salons. I'm not spending my money supporting employers who make their employees sick. I'm just not doing it anymore.
Sivaram Pochiraju (Hyderabad, India)
Wise decision. It protects you too from getting skin and other dreaded diseases. Further saves money too.
jwp-nyc (new york)
Landlords who rent their property to nails salons are risking expensive litigation from their other tenants due to the environmental hazards presented by the solvents and volatile and alaphatic hydrocarbons contained in nail polish removal as well as the the nail polish itself.

Let's be frank, if you have any kind of sense of smell whatsoever it's obvious that nail salons are a toxic business.

Customers who frequent nail salons should also be aware that they are at risk - not as much as the workers who spend their days there, but there is no question that they are exposing themselves to many times the ppm of toxins in a nail salon compared to doing their nails at home.

The chemicals common to nail products have been banned from consumer goods like wallboard or house paints. The primary solvent used to remove and thin polish; acetone, produces potentially explosive vapor. In nail parlors, it should be noted, that double as hair parlors, hydrogen peroxide is commonly used in bleaching product. Combine hydrogen peroxide and acetone and an incredibly potent primary explosive is produced under the simplest of circumstances. Disposing of wipes, for example, in the same plastic bags, could have a very undesirable effect. Kaboom.
Richard (Massachusetts)
The cosmetic industry and the beauty industry has been exploiting and poisoning its employees for well more than a century. Not to mention the damage done to the health of consumers.

My mother was a hairdresser from her youth in the 1930s and worked in the industry (and it is an industry) until the 1970s. She started of with Helina Rubinstein and worked for Elizabeth Arden in her New York Salon and at Arden's Maine Chance Fat Farms in Mouth Vernon Maine and Phoenix Arizona,

During those years she was exposed to the chemicals used then (and still used in unventilated and under ventilated salons. Aa a result she suffered until her death in 2004 at 98 from acute sinusitis due to chemical burns. She did this to put me through college.

I work in the sciences now and I will tell you that research labs and universities are required by law to provide laboratory fume hoods band biological safety cabinets, powered air purifying Respirators (PAPR) and other protective nitrile gloves and other personal protective equipment (PPE) to work with the volatile, organic chemicals, oxidizing agents, and strong acids and bases and other dangerous agents that are routinely used by beauticians of all verities with no ventilation and no protection.

This industry literally stinks. it is a crude capitalist enterprise which exploits women. The poor women and immigrants who make up the work force and the middle class and wealthy women who patronize these establishments consumer products.
JenD (NJ)
I have never had a manicure or had acrylic nails. I have an allergy to nail polish and nail polish remover that goes back to childhood. After reading this, I was glad I had never indulged in this practice. But I was thinking that here is an opportunity for women to make a real difference in other women's lives. First, boycott the cosmetics companies that fight regulations and continue to make their poisonous products. Second, tell the companies you are boycotting them. May Kay doesn't look so "pink" any more, does it? Third, either stop getting your nails done or seek out a salon that uses safe(r) products and properly ventilates. We CAN make a difference.
japarfrey (Denver, Colorado)
As a society we have become mindlessly addicted to expecting women to look a certain way. If that way involves the poisoning of other women, well, so be it. Don't people see what's going on? Don't they understand the double-victimization involved? Cosmetics manufacturers almost certainly do, but are only focused on enabling this nonsense in the interest of big profits.
JRO (Anywhere)
this is disgusting. How vanity can lead to a whole profession which endangeres its workers and our societies through their children with birth defects. Think of what 20 bucks a week could accomplish for the poor if customers just gave it to a food bank or nonprofit organizations. That would be a thousand bucks in a year. Shameful.
Candide33 (New Orleans)
"Industry lobbyists flooded the State Capitol (some bearing gift baskets of lipstick and nail polish), spending over a half-million dollars fighting the ban, according to state records. Some of the country’s best-known cosmetics companies — Estée Lauder, Mary Kay and OPI, among others — weighed in against it. The bill ultimately failed."

The rich and their lobbyists own pretty much every politician in this country, that is why they can waltz in with baskets of nail polish and money and buy the death and misery for the poor.

The article yesterday said that these women make as little as $10 a day for a 12 hour day and live 8 to a room. The rich who exploit them can get away with it because almost all of them are here illegally so they can't report the abuse or they would be deported.

Nothing will be done until it starts affecting the rich, just like every single thing in this country of, for and by the rich.
Zeya (Fairfax VA)
Another awful example of how privileged human beings are mistreating vulnerable and largely powerless human beings for their sick vanity and greed. Sad that our species seems to be devolving at a record rate. Our planet and all of its inhabitants, including of course animals and plants, are doomed because of rotten, narcissistic people.
Dani (New York)
This is so scary. I lived in the European Union for years and I never worried about the "government" (aka lobbyists) allowing harmful chemicals in substances that I would consume. Or having to go to a bad doctor because I don't have up to par health I surance (all though that is another issue). When I read the way that these lobby's block legislation and the lack of response from government officials it reinforces the impression that people do not care about the harm they do to others.
Why does the FDA not have oversight on this (and many more) industry? Why is it that lobbyists continue to wield so much power? Why do these people in power not care about the harm they are doing to people? This lack of care is extremely scary and unsettling.
Zoe (Maine)
Thank you for giving this issue some press. There is a solution and it lies in the purses of all women who like to get their nails "done"... CHANGE THE MARKETPLACE! Nothing strikes more terror in the heart of companies that purvey the toxic chemical approach to anything we lay money out for then to hear from customers that they will no longer purchase from them. As someone who makes a habit out of shooting out a real letter of complaint (in the old days) and more and more a quick email to these companies I find THEY ALWAYS RESPOND! To see the change in what's on offer takes time, but it happens (witness the availability of non toxic dry cleaning services over the past few years). Consumer demand makes a difference ~ and so too do strong laws protecting consumers. Unfortunately, our laws often lag behind the science (which is unequivocal on the effect of these toxins on our health); and the science lags behind COMMON SENSE. Be the change ladies...take a break from doing your nails ~ and take a few easy moments to write to companies that make these products and tell them why. Imagine if they heard from the thousands and thousands of women who make up their consumer base that they need to change their formulations NOW?
Hafeeza (NYC)
I felt so sad reading this, particularly when I see the abundance of very low cost salons here. I think it would be appropriate to dig a little deeper when patronizing a salon. I know it provides income for women that are trying to make it for themselves and their children. My favorite salon in Charlotte appeared to be well run. The technician I visited regularly became pregnant and was so happy during the pregnancy. When I visited after she gave birth, I inquired about her, I wanted to send a gift. She lost the baby. Her co-workers were somewhat nonchalant, now I understand why. The miscarriages etc happen regularly. We just don't know. When she returned to work, the sadness never left her eyes.
Debra (Grosse Pointe, MI)
I'm removing the acrylic from my nails, cutting them short, and buffing them to a nice sheen. After reading this, I'm done with these products. I don't want them on my body, not do I want to support an industry that doesn't protect its workers.
Frank Language (New York, NY)
Or you can use any of the non-toxic nail polishes available on the market nowadays—in a wide range of colors—and do it yourself at home. No toluene, no acetone.
JHP (Manhattan/Honolulu)
From clothing, shoes & linens (hazardous dyes & solvents, slave wages, locked fire doors leading to tragedies like the Tazreen Fashions fire in Bangladesh, etc.) to soap, chocolate, coffee (possession & destruction of indigenous lands for palm oil, cacao, & coffee beans, respectively), & yes, the computer I am typing on, the production of many items we consume are responsible for someone or something (man, animal, environment) suffering.

What can one do?
1) Reduce consumption. Is there a way to repair or utilize what you already? Is what you want to buy something that was made to last? Editing possessions to things you truly love makes life so much simpler; for example, it's no longer a hassle to pack, or to choose an outfit. I don't need to buy more because what I already bought will last me many years. I'm not constantly searching for the best new thing, because I'm satisfied with what I already have.
2) Be mindful. Once you realize how much we are encouraged to consume on a daily basis, you see that much of it is unnecessary, & that things aren't always straightforward. A manicure sounds lovely, but as this article shows, what's facilitated in our choice to purchase a service/product isn't always readily apparent. Do your research. There are many reputable salons in NYC, but you'll obviously pay more. This is when you need to ask yourself how much you can afford to care; mostly everyone does not want to support injustice, but not everyone can afford $40 for a mani (cont.)
Robert (Melbourne Australia)
The concept of 'Self-Regulation' is a thinly disguised metaphor for 'No-Regulation". The 'Self-Regulation' mantra is nothing more than self- serving nonsense espoused by those who wish to escape scrutiny and who desire to exploit others without the fear of being exposed. It is an integral part of the 'free-market', 'small government' economic ideology. This economic ideology will eventually end in tears and over the dead bodies of many exploited workers.
JHP (Manhattan/Honolulu)
(cont). It's difficult to navigate the marketplace, as a consumer. Things aren't always what they appear, and there are so many options; it gets confusing. Personally, I came to realize about ten years ago (I am in my mid-20s) that my dollars (through what I choose to purchase) count as support.

There's a Hawaiian word called kuleana, which can loosely be translated to a sense of personal responsibility and ethicality. Although it costs me more in both money and time (to educate myself about a product and/or company), I choose not to support fast fashion, for example. However, injustices exist in every industry. What's in your laundry detergent, your dish soap, your body lotion? What does it do to our bodies, to our environment? I stopped buying all drugstore personal care products, for example, because all of them have questionable ingredients and were tested on animals (not just rats, but also cats, dogs, rabbits and monkeys). A lot of department store brands do this as well, and there's a lot of greenwashing going on. For example, a brand can say they don't test on animals, but be owned by a parent company that does, or simply hire another company to do the testing for them. Or they may state that no finished products were tested on animals, but the individual ingredients may have been. How is one to know? It's a depressing situation, but as consumers, we have power in our choices. There ARE ethical companies; it just takes a little more sacrifice to seek & support them.
Galen (San Diego)
WOW. This is just a gorgeous piece of investigative journalism. I'm perfectly ready to receive rebuttals from people who quarrel with it, but this has enriched my life. It makes me remember hearing about the virtual slavery imposed on migrant orange-pickers in Florida/California by bosses that told them that they were forever paying off their "importation costs." As my (Southern child) mom pointed out: "This was the same price that was imposed on the American negro after Reconstruction. The property owners convinced the sharecroppers that they had to pay off their [imposed] debts, and very few of them could."

In a world of mostly isolated online communities, we rarely get a glimpse into a reality that makes us uncomfortable, except for shock and advertising value. This is shocking but refreshing. Answer the question: who is going to make money off of this story? The Times? Yeah, but just a pittance. So what if some people are Pulitzer-chasing? They either deserve it or they don't, and the articles either convince you or the don't. Even if it comes out that some of the content may be overstated, this is journalism at its best. I didn't give a hoot about nail salons until I read this. Now I'm examining my own prejudices and values. I've never been to a nail salon and probably never will, yet this article makes me care. Let's not reduce this to "Nailgate." Anything but that PLEASE. the suffix "gate" now means "let's stop thinking and get angry at other people."
Hakuna Matata (San Jose)
These are clearly products whose use needs to be regulated. Open a bottle of "acrylic liquid", a chemical used to lay on acrylic powder, and you will very quickly understand why.
JRS (RTP)
This report reveals incredible tragedies on so many levels; the tragedy that so many desperate poor people are left to a cruel existence, the tragedy of exploitation of workers, the tragedy that we have become such a vain and uncaring society and the tragedy that we can not count on government protection (OSHA) due to lobbyist bribing government workers. The political right wants LESS government; makes you want to hollow.
january (Seoul)
Thanks for the good story and nice experiment of translation service. And I, as a native Korean, think it would be nicer if you add the name of the translator at the end of the article along with contributors. Hope more translated articles are coming!
Jack (East Coast)
The US has continued to turn a blind eye toward consumer and worker safety in the name of freedom. Beyond this article, major threats include:
- Tattoo inks - 70% made in China - that are implanted for a lifetime and which go totally unregulated
- Food imports - many from countries with few pesticide regulations
- Untested and unregulated drugs masked as "nutritional supplements"

A century ago Upton Sinclair and the press opened America's eyes to the meat-packing industry. The Times has done a similar service here. Many more opportunities await.
jgaughran (chappaqua new york)
The town that Hillary Clinton lives in - Chappaqua - is jammed with nail salons. She should look into this and have something to say, especially in light of her new interest in the fate of immigrants.
kathyinct (fairfield CT)
As should every GOP candidate? WHY do you select only a woman candidate and a Democrat? Where's Rubio and Fiorina???????
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
@Kathyinct: because it is women who get manicures and pedicures. They are rare among men (except maybe some urban metrosexuals). Hillary gets HER nails done, it would be appropriate for her to speak up about this.
JRS (RTP)
JRS RTP Pending Approval

This report reveals incredible tragedies on so many levels; the tragedy that so many desperate poor people are left to a cruel existence, the tragedy of exploitation of workers, the tragedy that we have become such a vain and uncaring society and the tragedy that we can not count on government protection (OSHA) due to lobbyist bribing government workers. The political right wants LESS government; "makes you want to hollar!" (sorry)
indie (NY)
The dose makes the poison. When a cosmetic company formulates a product, the goal is to make it safe for use by the consumer, in the ordinary way a consumer can be expected to use the product. In that context, I'm sure nail products are fine for consumers . The danger changes when a commercial operation begins using the consumer product in mass quantities, such as the salon business. In the commercial context, the use of the product differs from the way a normal consumer would use it and the exposure to the product increases as well. So, in a commercial operation,like a salon business, it is up to the business to provide the engineering, personal protective and administrative controls to make the workplace environment safe (and is probably the point the cosmetic lobbyists in Washington were making - not that I like lobbyist, but...).

Making the workplace safe isn't hard, it just costs money. But, businesses do not want to spend the money on safety which is why conservatives oppose regulatory agencies like OSHA and the EPA. If you don't like that this can happen, don't vote for people who think regulatory agencies are evil.
Ad absurdum per aspera (Let me log in to work and check Calendar)
I believe that the relevant term of art from industrial hygiene is "occupational exposure"; something might be tolerable in small amounts or occasionally, but not so in frequent prolonged exposure.

It In the case of nail salons, it also seems very likely the workers take in much more per unit time through respiratory pathways than does the customer.
MS (CA)
I have never had a pedicure or manicure; I do my own nails. But I have a few friends for whom these treatments are a regular part of their life.

I hope women everywhere *demand* that the products used for nails be made safer, both for themselves and for these workers. The impact of buying and consuming organic products has downstream benefits: for example, producing organic food has meant decreased exposure for farm workers to certain chemicals. And thanks for introducing the "healthy nail" program; It's nice to know that a salon in my neighborhood bears this designation. If I ever decide to go for a treatment, I will keep it in mind.
Demand safety (Virginia/Wash DC metro)
My salon requires/allows workers to wear masks & gloves. Is this enough? Probably not, but I don't use acrylic nails or other such products and bring my own No-Miss polish without some (all?) of these chemicals. I've used alternative polish, as well as base coat & top coat, for years with success. Just not going to a salon won't cure the matter--demand safety for the workers.
Jasmine Marshall Armstrong (Merced, California)
I will never buy another bottle of nail polish which contains the toxic 5 chemical, nor will I go to any salon that is not certified as green. It is an outrage that industry lobbyists can prevent updating of laws to protect the health of workers in the beauty industry. Like the Radium Girls who were told to keep their paint brushes sharp by licking them, working class women of America continue to have their healthy, fertility and future sacrificed on the alter of profits.
Will.Swoboda (Baltimore)
So now we have another community that says they are getting all sorts of diseases because of their evil employers. As far as government regulations go, do we really need the government to tells us about things we should already know? Anybody with half a brain should know that if you work in an environment where acrylic vapors are present, YOU USE A RESPIRATOR. In many places around the globe that is called common sense. I do sympathize with workers that don't know this but see a lot of Asian women in this trade who do exactly that.
kathyinct (fairfield CT)
The salon owners forbid GLOVES let alone respirators. Blame the workers, eh?
Carla Collier (California)
Do your research! While DBP, Formaldehyde, Formaldehyde Resin and Camphor are harmful you need to examine the acrylic being used in these corner salons. This is the product causing their issues. There is a big difference in Methyl Methacrylate and Ethyl Methacrylate. You will find that the salons filled with abused immigrants and the majority (if not all) of cheap corner salons are using poisonous MMA. The problem with polish is minor compared to this ingredient. EMA is the safer of the 2. I have been using it for 30 years, through 3 pregnancies and all is well. Methyl Methacrylate is the hidden evil here! It is cheap and lasts forever causing harm to the nail tech and the client. Even worse int he human trafficking involved with many of the salons that use this MMA poison! Check it out!
Sivaram Pochiraju (Hyderabad, India)
Very sad but true. It's not purely pedicure and manicure that causes all sorts of dreaded diseases but the entire cosmetics of ladies that can cause havoc on their bodies due to the chemical content. This menace extends to hair dying even. It's always better to be natural the way we are instead of getting into all sorts of problems that include making huge hole in the pockets.
EarthMom (Washington, DC)
Heartbreaking. If this is causing children to become intellectually disabled, these products should immediately be taken off the market.

I have always railed against the pervasive used of chemicals in our beauty and cosmetic products. Most people think I'm crazy, but I think they are stupid for trusting large corporations to do what is right.
Lisa (Texas)
Can you please print this in Vietnamese as well? Most of the nail places where I live have Vietnamese staff and I'd like to be able to share this as appropriate.
kaliruby (New York)
why not train these diligent and prospective citizens to be health care workers? or child care workers? and reward them for their diligence and desire to make a good life in the US. Here is where Capitalism fails - meaningless labor that demeans human beings is not a "free" market. Let us look to raise standards of human life and create a society that values people. We can all feel good about a system that employs workers to make life good and healthy for all of us.
Hle (LA)
It would be more helpful if the article is available in Vietnamese.
Denise (Seattle)
As someone in the industry, precautions do need to be taken. However, it is well know that many salons to keep costs down, use products from China that are not to standards.
Deb (Boise, ID)
Reminds me of the acid that was used in Elizabethian makeup. People will be much better off when they all realize that beauty is inherent and within rather than painted on and that loving kindness is much more important than plumage.
Frank Language (New York, NY)
On the rare occasions I've gone to nail salons, I've always preferred to bring my own polish; I always buy the kind without serious toxins like toluene, but also it's easier to touch up when it chips, as it's bound to. There are now a few brands without the abortifacients and carcinogens mentioned in your article, and salons that specifically give a toxin-free mani/pedi.

At this point my nails are in horrible shape, and actually I don't care much after reading this article. Tomorrow I'm going to paint my toenails myself, because I can.
Ronko (Tucson, AZ)
It would be interesting to see images of the cosmetic manufacturing process and bottling plants. I bet the workers in these plants are dressed like sterile lab techs with protective gloves, masks, proper regalia, and copious ventilation. Sadly corporations are allowed to write the rules, or no rules, and in the process identifying the lives of minorities and immigrants who preform their dirty work as negotiable.
Daniel M. (NYC)
I try not to dwell on the subject of illness in relation to hazardous chemicals as much because it leaves me paranoid. However, I can't help but speculate that my late mother's breast cancer was attributed to working in the nail salon that she owned for over a decade. It also leaves me wondering whether my poor performances in grade school were due to being exposed to hazardous materials at a young age.

Nevertheless, this article is extremely intriguing and sad. Yet, it gives me the motivation to pursue a MPH in Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and hopefully go work for OSHA.
Allison (Los Angeles)
The topics of the NYT's two stories about the dangers of working in a nail salon are more related than one might think. Those establishments that pay so little to their workers, abuse them, etc., are typically the same places that cut corners in other ways, such as poor ventilation and using cheap yet illegal chemicals for acrylic nails (a much bigger problem than nail polish). They're known in the industry as non-standard salons, and they're often the places that are also plagued by problems with infections and disease.

If you want to get a manicure or pedicure, do your homework about the salon. Do they charge an amount that's reasonable both for you and the nail tech? Do they thoroughly sterilize their foot spas and implements? Is the salon well ventilated? Do they refrain from cutting into your skin with metal implements (a practice that's actually illegal in California)? If you can answer yes to these questions, then you and your nail tech are safe.

There ARE salons and techs that are doing things right. Seek them out!
leftcoast (San Francisco)
I could never understand why the nail employees where wearing dust masks. An acetone molecule will pass through one of those masks like a piece of sand through the Holland tunnel.

Acetone etc. can be absorbed through the skin, if anything they should be wearing gloves.

Ultimately they should be working in a fume hood and with gloves.
Charley horse (Great Plains)
A fume hood! That would get the customers' attention, and they might question whether they should be participating in an industry that exposes its workers to such dangers.
Michael (Boston)
This cries out for an epidemiological study documenting the health of women who work in nail salons versus age and ethnically matched controls in the same geographical area who do not.

Then show the hard data to OSHA or whatever agency oversees workplace safety.

Heartbreaking to read this story.
Mary Sojourner (Flagstaff, Az.)
Call me simplistic. How about it if we women - many of whom see ourselves as sisterly or liberated or powerful - stop using nail polish and fake nails? Then we take our naturally beautiful hands out into the world and put them to good use changing the economic tyranny in this country? Three-year-old girls being taken for spa pampering? Congratulations on raising the next hideous generation of narcissists.
zeno of citium (the painted porch)
exactly. i don't understand this "manufactured beauty" fetish except as a mid-and low income fix to our sense of having some measure of wealth and a stroking of our self-worth. we sleep through most of our lives and wake up briefly to take of our lives on rare and transitory occasions only to fall back to sleep again....
E (Ohio)
I don't think we can say that using cosmetics, nail polish, etc. means you're a narcissist. There's nothing wrong with wanting to enhance your natural beauty. However, I've never had a manicure/pedicure at a salon, and now I never will--doing it at home is just fine for me.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
What is strange is this: most women over 50 remember when this was NOT a fad. It is a pretty recent phenomena -- since the late 80s perhaps. Before that, check out movies and TV programs of that earlier era -- nail polish was not mandatory at all. Most women wore nothing on their nails -- they were shaped and trimmed neatly and that as it. MAYBE they had a coat of clear polish.

Even more true for toenails. I remember seeing photos of my mom (as a young woman) with red painted toenails and laughing at it (I was maybe 12, in the 60s) -- who did that? It was so FIFTIES! It had nothing to do with the "natural beauty" pushed in my teens and 20s.

Even among women who did get manicures, it was more grooming and not this obsessive thing where one's nails must be perfect, match their clothing, or have elaborate designs, French tips, jewels, hand painted details. It was a special occasion thing -- you MIGHT get a manicure for your prom or your wedding. Not bi-weekly!

This is a real change, fetishizing nails. It's a fad, and we can end the fad by showing young girls what a time-consuming waste of money this it (even beyond the abuse of foreigners, illegal immigrants, environmental hazard and so on).
partisandaily (california)
It's hard to comprehend the level of suffering reported in this series. And the tragedy is compounded. The poisonous atmosphere will inflict suffering on the children of the women working in these horrible conditions.
All for painted fingernails? I think even Marie Antoinette would have been shocked.
Sbr (NYC)
Saw Maslin Nir on PBS Newshour this pm - got some insight about the commitment of the NYT.
Maslin Nir was given time to research this over an entire year and was assisted by six interpreters (2 each in Spanish, Korean, Chinese) - an outstanding effort and fantastic reporting.
Well done! Of course, it's once the tip of the iceberg but it might help Americans understand better how the struggles and suffering of the undocumented sustain lifestyles of elegance.
India (Midwest)
At the salon where I get my manis and pedis, all the manicurists wear masks and for various procedures, wear gloves as well. There is no powerful odor of chemicals in the shop, and nearly all the manicurists I have used have children. I might add, that many of their children attend the elite magnet schools in my city. I think many of the manicurists are Vietnamese. Their hands are not red and peeling, nor are they coughing. They look as healthy as their customers.

All this talking about women who get manis and pedis being stupid, superficial creatures is just appalling. I get pedicures a few times a year as they make my heavily calloused old feet feel better. Painted toenails also look better with sandals - unpainted ones look sort of "naked" to my eye.

As to my nails - mine have always been thin and prone to breakage. I never could get them all the same length - always a few broken way down. I never painted them as I did not care to draw the eye to these pathetic things! Then I discovered gels! WOW! What a difference they have made to my nails! No more breakage! And my cuticles have never been healthier since I started getting a manicure every 2-3 weeks. One thing I have learned about being elderly is that outstanding grooming is essential. It's bad enough to have veiny, spotted old hands. If they're neatly manicured (not easy for arthritic old hands to do), they look a LOT better. And I do leave a 20% tip.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
I wonder, India, if you could achieve self-esteem and sense of worth as an older woman any other way. I say this as a fellow older woman (grandmother!) and on Mother's Day no less.

Your feet? preventing callouses works better than removing them. How about better fitting shoes? Scrubbing with pumice stone in the bath or shower? Heavy moisturizer use, especially in winter? Regular nail trims done by yourself?

Ditto for hands. Wear gloves when you garden or do dishes. Moisturizer several times a day. Use a sugar scrub or similar to remove dead skin. Put Vitamin E oil on your cuticles each night. Trim your thin nails to a short, simple oval -- don't try to have long, thin nails.

Unless you have mobility or vision problems, or are diabetic, you can do this yourself. Also: nobody is criticizing the person who has a mani-pedi a couple of times a year as a treat -- we are looking at those who get a $10 manicure each week, and never consider how a salon could price it that way, ignoring how low paid the workers are or their illegal status.
Elizabeth (Los Angeles)
I guess the situation in NYC is much different than elsewhere, particularly in LA. Nail salons here don't have noxious smells, and we pay three times the prices mentioned in these stories. All of the salons here are Vietnamese owned and staffed, and none that I've seen have the sweatshop atmosphere described in the comments.
Richard Scott (California)
Look harder....they're not making this up. I have walked by salons with 20 head-down pedi workers with white particle masks (yes, that should do it...) and fumes so strong the eyes burn.
And all that in gentrified, high education per capita San Diego. It's most definitely an issue...fir those working there.
Anne (Portland Oregon)
Please, make an effort and take a closer look. A good many of the salons in the LA and OC are just as bad if not worse than in NYC! The poor women "working" in these salons are not working they are enslaved!
I spend 1/2 the year in LA so I know about the conditions there.
Elizabeth (Los Angeles)
Anne, I spend the whole year here so maybe I know better than you?
alee (Budapest)
One solution is cheap and easy - make a fume cupboard from a fish tank or perspex dome with holes for hands on opposite sides, and run a tumble dryer exhaust hose driven by a couple of computer cooling fans to vent the fumes outside. Should cost less than $100.
Would be even better if the fumes could be incinerated before venting, perhaps passing through an incandescent coil, but that would use energy and incur extra costs.
alan (usa)
If you ever walked in a nail salon and took a whiff of the air, the heavy chemical smell would be so strong.

By resisting regulation, the industry is putting profits above the health of their workers.
iphone user (Paterson NJ)
Let's go after these businesses big time. If they are not paying their employees properly they probably are not paying taxes on their profits as well.
Rebecca (Pelham Bay)
Sometimes on the weekend when I run errands I walk past a very crowded nail salon in my neighborhood and because they leave their door open the smell of the polishes, glues, and solvents permeates a good portion of the block. I have a hard enough time breathing just walking past the place. I have no idea how the workers can survive in there (obviously after reading this article it's clear how dangerous it is for them).

And mind you, that's only one of several nail salons within a 3-block radius.
Old School (NM)
This is very sad, the zeal with which the nails are pursued by a great number of women is sad as well. Th large fake nails, whether pointed, square or heavy with acrylic paint are not attractive. I hope all women cease this practice. A little color some color variation on natural nails is all you need.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
Fashions do change. But sometimes what is in fashion is unhealthy -- like when women in the 18th century put white lead paint on their faces to look "fair" in complexion. Or when Chinese women bound their feet, so they would appear to have tiny, child-like feet.

I grew up in the 50s and 60s. By the time I was a teen, the style was to be "natural" -- I thought of nail polish as some old lady, fuddy-duddy thing. Young women had natural nails. Look at some films of that era -- you won't see polished nails on most young actresses.

I had rarely even heard of a manicure then, and when you got one, it was some fancy dress up occasion -- your prom or wedding! Not something anyone did weekly. It was costly and time-consuming! And it chipped quickly. It is definitely not something one associates with a woman who works with her hands, gardens, does art or plays a musical instrument.
Dr. Mitchell Sojack (Fredericksburg, Virginia)
I am a commercial real estate investor. I have rented to many of these Vietnamese nail salons. When I open the door the fumes are so overwhelming I have to walk out immediately. Our local building codes insist that they put in special ventilation but, I don't think it helps very much.
mandala (nyc)
"The organization helped form a coalition in California that pushed for restrictions on chemicals used in nail salons, but the cosmetics industry succeeded in blocking a ban." The cosmetic companies should be sued by the workers in the nail industry. One day our culture will see this process of nail painting is akin to foot binding or female circumcision - it a dangerous superficial process. Make it illegal to use these acrylic chemicals.
Rachel (Chicago)
Thank you to the reporter, contributing reporters, and the NYT for spending the time to bring these stories to light. I would love to see a book going even deeper into these issues and featuring more stories chronicling what these workers face.
World Citizen (Americas)
This is a great example of investigative journalism. It’s not only nails (that’s only scratching the surface, pun intended), but a large part of the so-called beauty industry. A few months ago, my hair colorist (who is excellent, professional, successful at her job… and a single mother of two) told me that she wants to quit in a few years and start doing something else for a living, because she´s afraid of the long-term damage caused by all those hair-coloring chemicals that she is exposed to every day. That got me thinking.
As other commenters have said, this is not just a problem in the U.S. I would say it’s even worse in developing countries, where labor is cheaper and –because of societal pressures– women want to look good all the time. In Latin America, it’s very common for women to get their nails done once a week. It’s cheap and it’s expected of them.
As other commenters have also said, it would go a long way to translate this article into other languages. People throughout the world need to start getting educated about these things. It won’t change things overnight, but it’s a first step.
Charley horse (Great Plains)
When I was a teenager in the early 60's, I started wearing puffed-up hairdos that required a lot of hair spray. My father, a pulmonologist, was horrified and scolded me about it frequently. One day, in frustration, he brought me a medical journal article and laid it down in front of me. The title had something to do with autopsies on hairdressers and lung damage from exposure to hair spay. He said: "Autopsy! You know what that means?! It means they died!" A few years later fashions changed and so did I, and there was no more hair spray. On the rare occasions when I use hair spray now I follow Bill Clinton's excellent example and I don't inhale. But unfortunately hairdressers who work with it all day long don't really have that option.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
Charley horse: Great example! There was a STYLE for many years (50s-60s) for bouffant hairdos -- it was just as obsessive then as the focus now on fancy mani-pedis. Nearly EVERY woman had to have a puffy, back-combed hair style looming above her head -- and you could only maintain this look with copious amounts of hair spray.

Then suddenly, around 1968 it all changed. The style went to long, straight hair -- very simple, no product, just wash and wear. My god, did it make life EASIER for millions of women! no curlers, no setting gel, no hair spray, no sitting for hours under a hair dryer hood (this was before blow dryers).

BTW: part of that natural look back then was plain, natural fingernails.

Styles CAN change. We can make them change.
Rocky's Mom (GA)
I stopped going to nail salons in the 1990's when I noticed the workers wearing masks, and they didn't offer me one.
The Choosy Chick (CT)
So - so glad you wrote this article. The toxins in nail salon products have been linked to so many health issues and it is so sad that the concern for workers is not being addressed. Such a sad story at hand - with very little regulation surrounding the cosmetics industry. These stories have GOT to be shared more and more and ladies - quit going to the salon, and if you must use polish, choose one that is water based and 5 Free. Personally, I cannot stand to sit amongst the aroma of chemicals in these places.
SCA (NH)
Please stop asking where the government is in all this. Government and business follow the money.

We are not infants. We need to recognize what sorts of gratifications are appropriate to indulge in, and what are not worth destroying the health of people and the planet we live on.

Theres no shortage of lowly service jobs these women can move into. When the trend is to healthy and beautiful rather than harmful and ludicrous, these women will not have to suffer as they do now.

But do please note that their own societies have created and perpetuate their suffering. We are just exploiting that...
kaliruby (New York)
Really? Their own societies? In many cases, immigrants come from societies that the US has altered by military and political intervention.
anne march (nyc)
you are right. it all follows the money. so why do we not exercise our consumer rights by not purchasing or partaking in what we disagree with. i think that would be an effective strike that any business owner would listen to.
zeno of citium (the painted porch)
we are the government.

or are you saying that while the old form of our constitution still exists, the substance of it belongs to others now?

I could agree with either of those positions....
Richard Scott (California)
I'm glad that those os us in the GOP realize the perfect wisdom of the free market takes care of all things. Onerous regulations enforced by a draconian OSHA is a job killer. Of course those who whine about a health problem are just part of that 47% wanting free stuff, like health care if they get sick on the job, and someone to look into it if all of their children end up in quote special births, unquote.
If there really was a problem the market would simply self-correct, by limiting the amount of workers still available to work in this dangerous job. It would be something like Romney's idea of self deportation for immigrants... they would just leave if things were really bad enough. Right? Far right, maybe?
There, the market has once again taken the best care of the people possible. Why I feel better already. I think I'll pamper my wife by taking her to get her nails done in one of those places that is packed with immigrants ready to serve!
I feel better already.
JMC (Huntington, NY)
If the FDA really gave a damn, they'd intensely lobby Congress to "fast-track" broader laws to govern the use of these industrial chemicals that do not belong on the nails or hands (or in the lungs) of any woman.

But then again, the FDA - at the top - is run by men, with the exception of one woman, Sally Howard, J.D., a deputy commissioner. Sally, will you kindly weigh in on this rather important matter?
Hools (Half Moon Bay, CA)
It's not Federal agencies' role to lobby Congress. That is our job as citizens. Unfortunately, members of Congress seem to listen only to big monied interests these days.
zeno of citium (the painted porch)
you hold the fda at arms length as some sort of "other" but you (and i, and the rest of us here in america) own the fda. they operate at our pleasure as a function of our system of government. we need see and accept our responsibilities here.
sarai (ny, ny)
Nail salons and manicurists have functioned in this country long before the current proliferation of immigrants working in this industry. I'm wondering what the statistics about workers' health were like then and why this has come to the fore only now. It is true that only in relatively recent years have more complex styles and products emerged and been in use, like adhesives for false nails, miniature designs etc. Regulation seems to be in order. With our advanced science and technology there's no reason safer products could not be researched and used. All it needs is for manufacturers to care about the well being of workers and the customers they serve. Note: provided there's no language barrier women have been and are widely known to speak and confide in all manner of beauticians to the extent that the relationship is even a cliche.
David (Lawrenceville, NJ)
I preformed a search for "manicurist work station ventilation" since the ventilation and glove protection have got to be the second line of defense for the safety of the client and employee. The first is surly to not have the toxic materials at all. What I found was that most of the work stations don't have any ventilation at all and most of the rest recirculate the air to the room. The air needs to be disposed of outside in an environmentally safe way. The CDC has a bulletin with good practice that looks correct to me as it can capture the fumes and particulate at the site of the nails and put it outside. They say there are 350,000 people in the US that make there living in this industry so I don't think it is going away. There are ways to dramatically improve the safety of the clients and manicurists. Sweat shops need to be shut down if they will not protect both their workers and clients. Clients should not patronize any place where when they walk in they smell any solvents.
db (northern MN)
Someone wrote, "Where is OSHA? Where are the health inspectors?" I would ask, "Where are the consumers with a fraction of a percent of common sense and concern for THEIR OWN health, let alone that of others?"

If a product is for sale, it won't hurt you. So think millions of people. If it doesn't demonstrably kill you in a week or a month, it's safe. Anyone who claims otherwise is a crank or a hysteric. If the industry says that what it peddles can't hurt you, it never will.

Yeah.

Everyday products get worse all the time. I, for one, am highly reactive to aldehydes, phenols and petroleum compounds. This makes many products noticeably toxic to me. Even a few years ago, I could still, nevertheless, buy used clothing or take home books from the library. No more. I have not gotten more reactive; products are worse.

My husband and I now sit on small cutouts from plastic bags when we go out to eat, because if we don't, we arrive home scented to the skin wherever we contacted chairs or booths. This is from other people's perfumed laundry products (which never used to be so bad). When the scents get into our clothes it takes a wash and up to two weeks of airing to expel them. I count myself fortunate that most stores stink to heaven now - we don't need more stuff anyway. Nail salons? Whew!

It boils down to the fact that in this country, we all have the right to hurt anyone else with our crap, but we have little or no means to defend ourselves from other people's. Not good.
Garrett Clay (San Carlos, CA)
I worked as an engineer in technology, defense and electronics, and specified materials and processes. Back in the 80's there was a strong regulatory emphasis on toxics, and we reviewed the MSDS ( material safety data sheet) of every compound we used to manufacture products before approving their use. In school we were taught the Radium Watch Dial story, how to protect people, and what to use and avoid. Old timers in the chip business had horror stories about being up to their elbow in solvents we wouldn't dream of using. I thought we learned....

Once while getting my hair cut I noticed the distinct odor of methyl ethel ketone coming from the area where nails were done, it's a very dangerous solvent. I told the person who was cutting my hair how dangerous it was, and told her if she wanted to make it to 70 she should not work anywhere they used solvents like that. I told her to call Cal OSHA.
Richard Scott (California)
Call Osha?
There's 3 people left in the national offuce, and one local guy wuth direction from his supervisors to say, "We're looking into it..."
Apparenty, dominant culture members tend to think someone is just waiting, like a fire engine service, to spring into action on their behalf.
Ha ha ha.
RB (Alaska)
This is excellent journalism. I am deeply saddened by it. These working and pay conditions are deplorable, and I am sorry to have contributed to it as a customer -- and yes, on a purely selfish level, I will miss getting the occasional summer professional pedicure.

I don't get manicures and don't polish my fingernails, simply because I don't care for it. But I will say that it is not all silly vanity for women who do. I know many women who feel that discrete, professionally-done nails are part of the career uniform that a professional woman needs to wear in order to be taken seriously in a boardroom or courtroom. I think that's absurd for a number of reasons -- but that doesn't mean it's not true in some professions.
Native Manhattanite (New York)
A colorful personal narrative vbut not investigative level of data and depth
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
They may tell themselves that, but honestly, what profession would penalize a woman for having plain, neatly groomed and trimmed but unpolished fingernails? Do you want to see an elaborate manicure on the hands of your surgeon? or your attorney? or your airline pilot?

What are these jobs that require an elaborate, weekly mani-pedi?
winchestereast (usa)
I lost a beautiful, amazing sister at age 51 to multiple myeloma. No family history of cancer. Relatives, even smokers, lived into their late-80's, non-smokers, to late 90's, one to 102! But this wonderful, whimsical girl, with her perfectly painted nails, developed at 40 a terminal illness which killed her after a decade of pain, despite a bone marrow transplant from a perfect-match sister and heroic medical and surgical treatment over a decade from amazing physicians. Was it the toluene which soaked into her skin during one summer's factory job using solvents, after which we burned her clothes because the smell was intolerable? Was it decades of perfect manicures? Who knows? Will either industry allow science to decide?
BobW (LI,NY)
Hey Ladies who Love Perfect Nails:
The minimum wage is $8.75, your manicure cost about the same. You ever wonder what the women holding your entitled hands actually get paid?
Guess not when you have perfect nails.
Girl (Nc)
I don't know where you live, but even in my small town manicures are around $20-$25 and sometimes more.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
If you read the original article in SOME large cities -- especially NYC -- competition AND illegal immigration has resulted in vast numbers of small nail salons that compete for the lowest price, and currently charge about $10 for a manicure.

This is not true everywhere. I live in the Midwest, and prices are at least double that here.
Liza (California)
Where is OSHA?
Where are the health inspectors?
Where are the government agencies responsible for making sure that people are being paid a legal wage?
This is what happens when profit goes unchecked and there is no regulation.
I am disgusted by people who say "who cares if these women are sick" or "they know the risk."
If iI asked my students to work with known carcinogens without protective gear and without a fume hood that removes the chemicals from the air I could get fired and my university would receive large fines.
These workers deserve the same protection that scientists get in labs.
auntylynn (New Jersey)
"Where is OSHA?" is right!

Not even "second hand" tobacco smoke can be directly connected to miscarriages - but we segregate smokers, while Estee Lauder gets a free pass!
Kaleb (New York)
Good on you for providing it in several language, so the message can be read by those who need to see it the most!
Ronko (Tucson, AZ)
I assume the workers are too exhausted at the end of the day slog through it all. And from what I gathered they don't make enough money to afford a decent living much less the Times. This is on the clients, the women who must have so called "perfect" nails to make a difference in this culture.
green in la (los angeles)
8 years ago I opened started my eco friendly mobile spa business here in LA to offer an alternative to toxic environments of nail salons. We provide in-home nail services and use eco-friendly and non-toxic products for which I regularly vet ingredients, and use on myself regularly before customers. Part of my duty as an eco aware business owner, I feel, is to help educate my clients (and others) about the huge levels of toxins involved in the beauty industry. The addiction to artificial nails, in my mind, is the number one culprit (out of many) for the chemical poisoning of these workers. Defining female beauty and glamour through long fake nails has cultivated an industry that, ironically, is killing beautiful women. We need to educate and inform others so that there are no more consumers of this "beauty" product. When the market dries up and fake nails are thought of as being as disgusting as a pretty woman with a cigarette hanging off her lip, then we will be a good way toward ending this barbaric practice. The other next best practice is to take your own non-toxic products (easily available on line) in to your corner salon, if you need someone else to do your nails for you (I do get the psychological appeal of true pampering after a stressful week at work). Read all your labels, know your ingredients (go to Cosmetic Safety Database for this), and for god's sake, put a generous cash tip directly into the hands of your manicurist EVERY SINGLE TIME.
A. Wagner (Concord, MA)
This kind of heartless exploitation of poorly educated, underprivileged, unprotected Asian workers will skyrocket with adoption of the Trans-Pacific Trade Pact. US workers who demand safe working environments and fair pay will simply see their jobs disappear overseas in ever greater numbers. What a travesty—and from a Democratic president!
kaattie (california)
Maybe all this will change when men have fallen for the latest "must-have" (ugly fake nails and dangerous high heels) fads. How about bringing back radium-painted watch hands while we're at it?

Capitalism has created it and capitalism can't solve it.

Workers of the world unite!
PeteH (Sydney, AU)
Perhaps it will change when women feel they no longer have to sport the longest, trashiest nails in the never-ending arms race which is an integral part of the competitive beauty war they all wage against each-other? Women can change this - stop getting ugly acrylics and coating them with carcinogenic colored resins.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
How about also getting rid of very high heels (over 3")? they are dangerous -- uncomfortable -- lead to foot deformities in old age -- cause falls and ankle breaks! and knee damage. I broke the kneecap on each of my knees, in two different falls in my 20s -- wearing a stylish shoe of the time, called "Candies". They were open back, high heeled slip-ons with open toes (interestingly, the fad for painted toenails hadn't hit yet, so the toes shown were naked). My ankle twisted in the high, unsupported shoes and down I went.

A lifetime of high heels -- some women are addicted and never wear anything else! -- means an old age of pain and miserable foot problems. Yes, I know they look sexy.

How about having to flat iron hair (same excuse, it won't look "professional" if your hair is frizzy)? How about extreme dieting, and hatred of our own natural bodies, because "the style" is to be a size 0 or 2?
Paul (White Plains)
Nobody is forcing these women to cut and paint other women's nails. It's their choice. I'm sure that after fast food workers get a $15 an hour minimum wage, these nail cutters will also be lobbying for the same. Political correctness run amok.
concerned citizen (San Francisco)
What a cold-hearted response. Ugh.
Stacie (The Northwest)
I don't paint my nails except for special occasions, and even then it dries out my fingernails for weeks (and turns them yellow). The SMELL of the chemicals is the body's way of alarming us to a THREAT- if we ignore that, then there is a consequence. I doubt ventilation hoods are going to help businesses in the winter (when the heat is on), and people don't want to vent the warm air outside. And BTW, "reducing" the toxicity by venting through a hood implies that an impact still remains. We don't know what level, IF ANY, is safe. Maybe buffing & polishing your nails the old-fashioned way with an emery board & oil should be the new fad...I also worry about a friend of mine who is a cosmetologist and has been exposed to lightening/coloring chemicals day-in, day-out, for decades...and the ventilation for that has been sporadic, too...
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
Another excellent point: continued usage of daily nail polish results in stained, weak nails. Then you NEED the polish to cover up ugly nails!

Gel polishes stain nail even badly -- I had this done ONCE, on the suggestion of a salon worker. It did last more than 2 weeks, but when I took the gel polish off, my nails were stained fuchsia and it took weeks for the color to wear off. I would never use it again.
PeteH (Sydney, AU)
“What I hear are insinuations based on ‘linked to,’” said Doug Schoon, co-chairman of the Professional Beauty Association’s Nail Manufacturers Council on Safety. “When we talk about nail polish, there’s no evidence of harm.”

Uh huh. Because professional industry mouthpieces are such consistently reliable sources of information. If we were to believe the paid shills of industry, we would still be baking in solariums which don't cause skin-cancer, and smoking cigarettes for that rich, satisfying Virginia flavor.
NB (New York City)
Isn't the larger issue why so many women feel compelled to adhere to a standard of beauty that is very superficial and harms other women in the process? Why are more and more nail salons popping up all over New York City? Surely some of it is a rise in disposable income for the wealthy: why not donate the money one would spend on a charitable cause that promotes better conditions for women worldwide? Or, better yet, take a walk on a beautiful day and resist the lure of a nail salon altogether.
zeno of citium (the painted porch)
actually, i've seen it more in the less well off who use non-disposable income and that's why this is a more insidious issue because it's about where individuals place there self-worth and whether they ought place it there....
SCA (NH)
Seriously. Its not necessary to throw the manicurists out of business. Start a trend for healthy, beautifully-buffed nails; add other beauty-care services like simple face-mask facials and scalp massages.

Women created this problem and can solve it, but judging from many of the comments here, its unlikely they will. Theres no need for such toxic products to be created, used, and end up poisoning our air water and soil too.

It isn't hard to forswear dumb fashion trends. It just takes a little bit of maturity and self-control. But those are harder to find than safe nail-care products...
Michael Finn (Wenatchee, WA)
Chemical, biological exposures is a huge problem that nobody seems to even think about nowadays in non-medical or industrial jobs.

To my horror, I once saw a pregnant woman working at a photolab processing film. I pointed out to the management that those are some of the most toxic chemicals out there that a person could be exposed to. They said that they had been wondering why she had been having so many problems with her pregnancy. This happened despite a monthly safety meeting involving the lab. They didn't ever tell her about it either.

The FDA, OSHA, and any other member of the regulation chain are a joke. Trying to report problems can be more difficult for employees than the problem is for the employer, let alone the whistle blower "protections." It's time to end these companies public subsidies in going cheap on safety and make them prove that that the chemicals are safe for the workers rather than just the consumers.
Janie Heath (NYC)
You can at least find out if your nail tech is licensed here: https://aca.licensecenter.ny.gov/aca/GeneralProperty/PropertyLookUp.aspx...
A licensed tech has 250 hours of training which would mean more education about safety and a greater likelihood she is not being exploited.
Letitia Jeavons (Pennsylvania)
Isn't toluene used to make trinitrotoluene, better known as TNT? In addition to cancer risk, is there a safety risk or is the toluene too diluted by all the other chemicals?
I ask because while the FDA is fairly impotent, Homeland Security seems to have some power. That could be a backdoor way to get rid of one of the toxic 3.
Coo (New Jersey)
TNT is tri-nitro toluene. It is the nitro groups that causes it to explode. Toluene is just the carrier.

FDA is "impotent" because they have no funding for the cosmetics compliance activity. If you want things to change, don't vote for politicians who promise to cut taxes and further enrich the already wealthy again.
picklecreek (Missouri)
The "things you can do" side bar article missed 1 one: get society to shift away from the thinking that women must have long, lacquered nails to fit in and be successful. Clean, trimmed nails with no coatings should be sufficient and socially acceptable for all. And yes, the manicurists' jobs would change/go away. With short term pain for longer term health.
Hools (Half Moon Bay, CA)
Only certain women think that. Men could not care less.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
@Hools: many fashion fads that women adhere to are about the women themselves and their own draconian standards of beauty -- they are NOT so much about "what men want".

I doubt there is a man out there (a hetero man) who cares deeply that his girlfriend or wife has perfect manicured fingertips in a vivid color. Or prefers colored nails to plain natural ones.

When women did foot binding in China, it was women who had it done to their daughters -- it was women who considered large feet to be "ugly" or "peasant-like". Women set the standard and then torment themselves.

Look at the dieting mania: most MEN prefer women to be slim but curvy. Most WOMEN want to have the gaunt, skinny shape of a fashion model -- size 0 or 2.

Look at elaborate hair styles (especially in the black community): most MEN like soft, natural, touchable hair. Most WOMEN want hair that looks like something out of a magazine -- they don't think of touch or texture, just perfection and wanting to outdo other women (competition for mates?). Chris Rock made a very interesting documentary about this ("Good Hair").
a (a)
This is a wonderfully informative, well researched, and well written article. It makes me incredibly sad that workers are exploited and left to work in these unsafe conditions with no recourse. There needs to be serious investigation into this matter so that regulations can be changed to benefit these women. I have never been to a nail salon before, and after reading this, I will never go to one! It is crazy that these kinds of conditions persist in America and in the 21st century too! It reminds me of the mill girls of Lowell, who used to breathe in the cotton dust and die of lung illnesses, when illnesses and death could at least been moderated by better, safer equipment that was certainly available for those willing to pay for it.
Native Manhattanite (New York)
Sampke # of manicurists interviews is relatively low compared to # 'a total in BYC
The type of journalist is more color and human interest rather than investigative, data driven journalism.
This is the beginning but not the end. Let or scientific journalists take this investigation to a higher level.
Hopeful this narrative story will lead to bigger and better investigations.
Bread angel (Laguna Beach)
While I love to get pedicures, I have had fungus, bleeding nail beds and discoloration of my nails. I have gone back to doing my own nails, they look better and my hands and feet are healthy. Also, I really had the look of artificial french nails and believe that they are never clean and harbor bacteria.

That being said, my personal choices do not help the manicurists (most from foreign countries) who need to work and should have the right to work in a non toxic environment. If the beauty industry was smart, they would develop products that are safe for both the consumer and the worker. But instead of doing that, they would rather pay millions to overpriced lobbyists to promote their poisons.
Coo (New Jersey)
The products could be used safely if there were adequate ventilation. Chemists work with the same compounds for a lifetime, but don't breathe the stuff all day. Personal protective clothing and frequent air changes...
winchestereast (usa)
chemists likely wear gloves, respirators, .... not likely that this will sell lacquer to clients
Janie Heath (NYC)
The high cost of low prices. You may be attracted to cheap manicures, but the cruel health consequences also add to public health expense as well as being unethical. Not to mention the threat to your own health. I already knew to avoid smelly salons, which usually result from doing acrylics and/or having poor ventilation.
Jeff Robbins (Long Beach, New York)
I didn't see anything mentioned about the workers making the polishes. Has anyone been looking into their situation? Are they sufficiently protected? Where do the effluents of production go?
Jill (NY)
There was an article yesterday on Vice about the slave labor that is used in manicure shops.
scientella (Palo Alto)
There has to be market for non-toxic products. Like cleaning products.
Diana (Charlotte, NC)
I call this a kind of slavery. How does slavery not go away....it just keeps turning up in different places around the world? Until we evolve, we'll see more stories like this. God help us.
Morris (Seattle)
I'm really glad to see that the NY Times is highlighting these health issues. I rarely visit nail salons, but it's obvious what's going on with respect to these chemicals, dust, lack of ventilation etc. They could make it much safer by mandating vacuums to pull the dust and toxic chemicals and wearing gloves etc.

You'd never see anybody in the medical profession put their health at risk like these women do. Look at what dentists do to protect themselves.

It's amazing to think that it's 2015 and these practices go on in the United States with complete disregard for people's health. I would expect this more in second or third world countries.
anne march (nyc)
As a daughter of a manicurist, I feel powerless. On one side, my mother, like other women, worked 12 hr shifts for 7 days a week in a salon for nearly 25 years of her life and her health reflects it and on the other side, we have powerful and influential lobbyists backed by corporations continuing the existence of problematic toxins. What is this world teaching us but that we must fight to live while others fight to profit and it's all relative on which is more important.
What me worry (nyc)
I am so sick of the question "how will .. support?" In a country where we throw away about 40% of all food... and often charge too much or too little for shelter (location/location) and the stock market averages of booming -- for heavens sakes reader, Go Learn about why industrialized nations by definition have to have some kind of WELFARE ( dirty word that) STATE. The march towards endless physical beauty is absurd but we all do go thru that phase of life (I have only had one professional manicure-- do my own if -- consider it a waste of time except for toenails where layers of polish built up thru the summer == but you, there is lots that needs to be done , possibly less toxic than acetone and toulene and acrylic powder-- wash the floors in the subways (soap and water- a bit of ammonia-- power washing is not getting the dirt out) -- scrapping subway ceilings with falling paint and painting the tunnels white -- makes it easier to see everything using less powerful lights -- how amazing is that.) We need more home healthcare workers -- we need daycare. The women must be taught to speak and read English and perhaps it is time to bring back the live-in servant (maid's room). Back to the same old problems -- a bureaucracy that misspends millions of dollars and inflects dreadful work/living conditions on many people. (If you think cleaning the subways is bad, think about coal mines and steel mills!!)
Voiceofamerica (United States)
This should be the first in a LONG and ONGOING NY Times investigative series on the disease of capitalism and the victims of rising inequality.

We need profiles of ALL the leading business scoundrels and details of the enormous leverage they exert on our political system.
pgp (Albuquerque)
Blood diamonds on our fingers or blood acrylics on our fingernails. How dumb can we get?
Lisa Evers (NYC)
Right, yet how many people are shamed because they are wearing diamonds? Is not 99% of the married female population walking around with a diamond on her finger? But yet, it seems that the polish-wearing population has very suddenly become the de rigueur group for the PC crowd to shame. Mind you, I'm not saying that the working conditions in nail salons shouldn't be improved. Of course they should. But with this recent NYT article, and the hysterical level of comments, I wouldn't be surprised if polish-wearing women (regardless of whether they applied their own polish or not) start being subject to public shaming. Why don't we start publicly shaming vegetarians, and the cruel working conditions they knowingly contribute to for the poor, underpaid crop-picking immigrants who bend over all day in the hot sun?
anne march (nyc)
Thank you NYT for doing this article, for bringing it to the public's consciousness, for translating it so those that work in the industry can read and be aware. My mother is a manicurist and has been for over 20 years and she suffers/suffered from similar symptoms mentioned in this article (coughing blood, skin issues and issues with her immune system). In the past five years our whole family's life has changed when her health deteriorated drastically and we can't deny (nor pinpoint) that part of her health's decline has to do with her work as a manicurist.

My mother came to this country over 30 years ago where she was working as a nurse. Here, she became a manicurist since that was an easy entry for a young Korean woman. She supported a family of four with her meager pays and the tips she received from customers. Growing up, I've visited my mother at the salon to see her hunched over with clouds of dust flying around her face as she's grinding on someone's nails. I never thought at a young age to check if my mother's work place was properly ventilated and looking back now I don't know if proper ventilation would have changed much.

A 30-40 minute trip to the nail salon is most people's experience but for the people who work there and the families that they support, this is something we have to deal with for the rest of our lives. But not to say we don't appreciate the $ that we need to pay rent, buy food and other life necessities/wants.
susan m (OR)
I stopped having my nails done after moving to Portland Oregon in 2001. I had been going to a salon regularly, but the women who "cared" for my feet failed to inform me when I picked up a nail fungus in their salon. I stopped having my hand nails done when I saw how chipped and cracked the ends of the nails became after just a few weeks of polish. It does not take much to figure how unhealthy and unsafe the chemicals used are --- and salons have very little ventilation.

I am so sorry that the women who work in the industry are so exploited. It seems kind of typical for our world --- cheap and dispensable people and products so that those with money can have their pleasure.
Voiceofamerica (United States)
Why do we have war? Why do we have severe poverty, malnutrition, hopelessness? Why are we experiencing environmental devastation on a biblical scale?

Because of the business community.

If we can not find a way to severely restrict business and the greed impulse that has been elevated into a global religion, we are not going to survive.
blgreenie (New Jersey)
How troubling. These nail workers are working for a pittance while being exposed to volatile chemicals with serious and even deadly consequences. We can't assume a boycott will happen. If it did, nail workers might have to find income from doing jobs with even more jeopardy. A better idea is for nail patrons, many of whom are affluent and well educated, to use openings they may have, as individuals or in their organizations, to push local or state legislators for protective legislation. Nail workers have no political clout. Their customers must step up for them.
anne march (nyc)
Would the customers do that? Or do customers see nail workers just as expendable as the country sees it's citizens/residents.
Kenny (Huntington, NY)
I don't want to stay in the same room when my wife works on her nails, and she does it only after our kids go to sleep. Those workers should have better protection at their work place.
Matt (Seattle)
Please translate these articles into Vietnamese. The majority of nail salons around the US are Vietnamese. They need to read them.
mon (chicago)
There is a whole layer elaborate of drug safety reporting after a drug is on the market, mainly due so that the something like the thalidomide birth defects never happen again. How is it that this can be allowed to happen?
Hools (Half Moon Bay, CA)
The cosmetics industry is barely regulated in the US. Check out the Environmental Working Group's Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.
Caitlin (Albuquerque)
This has been a problem for decades and has only gotten worse with acrylic nails and gel polishes. I won't go to a solon that uses acrylics and have had a concern for years for the women who work there.
Citizen X (CT)
I find this whole business strange. I guess I can't comprehend it, as I have no memory of my mother ever having her nails done, or has my wife ever had anything done to her nails. Then again these are both intelligent, professional women who march to their own drummer. Sometimes I feel as if I live in a different reality.
SK (Boston, MA)
"Then again these are both intelligent, professional women who march to their own drummer."

That's rather condescending. I happen to know many intelligent, professional women who march to their own drummers and still enjoy having their nails done. Can't we throw out that tired stereotype that women who happen to enjoy beauty and fashion trends are somehow mindless sheep?
Holly (Eugene, OR)
Citizen X, I share your "reality." I don't visit nail salons or polish my nails at home. The smell of polish remover alone is overwhelming. I often feel that I must be among a minority of people who doesn't even like the look of polished nails and who believes that being well groomed doesn't necessitate polished nails (my husband shares this opinion).

Although I feel that people should have the right to choose how they adorn themselves (or not), I certainly don't believe that these practices should endanger the health and well-being of others. I feel for these workers and their families and hope the responsible government agencies take notice of this exploitation by nail salon owners and cosmetics companies.
Hools (Half Moon Bay, CA)
Enjoying "beauty trends" is not the same thing as insisting that women must have polished nails to look attractive or professional. The former is fine, unless it hurts others, as apparently much of the manicure industry does. The latter is ridiculous.
Vinode Rubins (Alachua, FL)
I worked in hospice care and encountered former manicurist and hair colorists with MS and ALS. Maybe it was a coincidence, maybe not.
Shirley (San Francisco)
Thanks NYT for giving voice to the salon workers. Out of skepticism, I didn't paint my nails during my pregnancy and then also when my daughter was an infant. When she turned three, I received a massage and pedicure package from a nearby salon. I thought at the time, "how nice, I will finally shed my post-baby casual look and re-enter the stylish world." However, after a week when my nails started to chip, and the polish remover caused my fingers to literally dry up and harden from rubbing off the nail polish (it was not easy to remove), I threw out all of it. It took several weeks for my fingers to recover from the dryness. Have not painted my nails ever since and will not subject any person to do it either.
Gigismum (Boston)
I've been aware of this problem since 1990, when I first moved to Brooklyn and learned that women got their nails done during the work day. My heart aches for the women being exploited. Beyond not patronizing such establishments, I do not know what else we the public can do.

Greed is not good.
Susan Anderson (Boston)
So typical of our cosmetized society. Time to get away from toxic surfaces.
songhai (Left Coast)
I absolutely hate when my daughter uses nail polish remover in the house. This research will justify an outright ban now.
Harvey Wachtel (Kew Gardens)
My wife took this article to her nail salon. She was concerned because her manicurist has breathing problems. The salon is staffed by one family of Asians whose members speak some English. They did not know anyone who could read the article in English and explain it in Chinese. They were interested in what it said but my wife could not explain it to them. There is an obvious need for outreach here.
Khan (New York)
Try printing out the Chinese-language version of the article and show that to them.
paula (<br/>)
Well here it is, the test case for humanity. If we can't quit "french nails" we won't be able to cut back on fossil fuels, or do anything else for our common humanity.

Sometimes compassion is virtually cost-free. This is one of those times. Push the cosmetic companies to switch to lower chemical solvents, or quit this industry entirely.
Wessexmom (Houston)
Well said.
Support Occupy Wall Street (Manhattan, N.Y.)
Thank you to the New York Times for printing this story in many languages so the people most harmed by these toxic chemicals, who may not be proficient in English, can read this excellent reporting.
suzin (ct)
Of course industry fights regulation. This is no surprise. We cannot allow ANY industry to dictate what is safe and what is not safe for either the customer, the worker, or the environment. Industry MUST comply with safety standards, and industry cannot set those standards. I am so tired of cowtowing to industry complaints, and to industry polluting the air with comments about bad science. This is complete baloney and a delaying tactic that has serious public health consequences. Let's get going and do the right thing in regulating industry. We always do too little too late. Enough already
kate (dublin)
The last article was met with cheerful disbelief from the women who insist that they are helping the poor by indulging themselves by looking "good" in this way, and that the women doing this work enjoy it. I hope that this finally changes their minds. It is in fact the twenty-first century version of the lead-based paint that wealthy women put on their faces in the eighteenth century, but in this case it is the poor workers who suffer the most.
mabraun (NYC)
These are a spectacular collection of of "local" invesxtigative (of course it is a national problem), reporting! This is a standout!-in all the many years I have read theTimes, it is articles like this one that always stick in memory. I do hope every woman and girl in the city who uses the services of these shops, and the people who work there , reads them.
As a guy, I have never had any use for them but I know too many girls and women who see the salons as a resource to be "mined to exhaustion" and the consequences are often in infections of the feet, hands and legs. This is the first written piece in the Times I have read that examines the serious health and welfare concerns of the workers. I hope to read followups to see what the reaction will be...

M Braun
NYC
SF (Boise, Idaho)
I would like to give a huge thank you to the NY Times for this series of important articles. I am not surprised by any of it, and want to know how we can make a change in this country to make sure that everything isn't about making as much money as possible. It HAS to be about the health of our citizens and environment over profits. We are poisoning ourselves through our food and surroundings every day. How on earth do we get people in power to do something to stop this, or even care? From factory farms to nail salons, we as a culture don't give a hoot about the health of our people, animals or environment. I applaud you for bringing this subject to light and I beg of everyone in this country to demand change. We don't need $10 manicures at the expense of people's health. If you can't afford a $40+ manicure you don't need it. You probably don't need it regardless, but if it can be done safely it can provide work for people moving here for a better life. We must protect them from ourselves.
Fleurdelis (Midwest Mainly)
Many of these salons offer their services at very low prices and I wonder if that is why they use these chemicals. When I get my nails done at a salon they don't use any chemicals. Just gel polish and clean instruments. I would never patronize a low price salon for many reasons and this is the main one. All the best to these individuals, so sad.
Veronica Femmina (NY)
"Just gel polish" Might want to research exactly what is in your gel polish. Harmful chemicals are used in those, too. There's controversy about the UV light, also. Supposedly, LED light is safer.
DGA (New Jersey)
No chemicals?? What do you think your gel polish is made of??
Helen Savage (Hoboken NJ)
Your high priced salon isn't any different from the "low price salons". Unless you are deluded enough to think that because you pay more, or your manicurist is paid more, that you are not being exposed to these chemicals.
Deanna (Buffalo, NY)
State laws should mandate the installation of mechanical ventilation systems in nail salons. They are effective at reducing exposures.
Kathy (Tucson)
If ever there was a more opposite of surprising article, I cannot think of it. What is the first thing you think of when you walk into a nail salon? Right. "Yikes, how do they breathe in this place?" The toxic nature of it - the work, the materials, the enclosed work space - all of it is way beyond obvious. The connection between workers' health and their work cannot be - I repeat simply cannot be - a recent discovery.
Hydraulic Engineer (Seattle)
This is one of the rare instance where men are not primarily to blame, other than those that run some of the salons. This weird obsession that so many women have with flamboyantly painted finger nails and, good grief, even toe nails is something that women mostly do to impress one another. I have never heard a guy say, "wow, she has such beautiful nails!" Even odder, there are some women who go overboard and allow their nails to grow grotesquely long and curled into claws so long that they even impede normal functioning. How do they wash dishes or use common tools, I wonder. It is kind like those men who take steriods to produce equally grotesque overmuscled bodies. I doubt most women find that terribly attractive, so I suppose they do that just to impress other guys.

Just keep your nails clean and neatly trimmed. That is all most people notice. Although I always find myself in awe and deep respect for the gnarled hands of a farmer or someone who works with his hands. Now that is a beautiful thing.
Carol (SF bay area, California)
Oh, yeah, no men have a profit motive in the manufacturing and advertising of nail care products.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
Elaborate nails are a status marker -- the Chinese, who invented foot binding, also had obsessive long nails (think: Fu Manchu).

Long, elaborate nails signify someone is wealthy, because you cannot do hard physical work and maintain that kind of fancy nail polish or length of nails. It also says you can afford to go to a salon at least once a week. It says you are special, pampered -- a princess!

It says you don't HAVE to wash dishes, garden, diaper a baby or type. You lead a life of pampered exclusiveness -- OR you at least look that way.

It is a rare man who even looks at or notices something like a manicure. When they do, I have heard men express alarm at a woman with very long nails (as in, they'd be fearful of such nails touching them in an intimidate spot!).
TheraP (Midwest)
The horrors this country permits, aids and abets is beyond belief! Are we really living in the 21st Century? Is this actually a first world nation anymore?

The Times is to be commended!
Meela (Indio, CA)
There was a time when I used to get my nails professionally 'done'. I got a "full set" as a birthday present and so I went. I liked the way they looked. And the polish lasted forever. But when I went to have them RE-done the process was barbaric. They would rip and tear the acrylic bits off the nail beds and your own nails would be destroyed. So I started to get them done just for the holidays and remove them by soaking in polish remover for a ridiculous amount of time.

Now when I want color on my nails I buy a bottle of polish and paint them myself. What a concept! I wear it for a couple of days and remove it myself. I treat the nail polish as an occassional accessory and that's that. My nails are delighted.

For so many women, the pedicure is the ultimate cheap luxury. I get it. I like the color on my toes but I am not comfortable in an environment of women (and men) hunched over someone's feet. I think what were these people doing in their own countries before they immigrated here? No one talks with them, the customers are on their devices completely ignoring the person at their feet. It's an image and situation that just doesn't relax me at all. Quite the contrary.

Thank goodness I am still flexible enough to be able to do it myself.
Ed (Watt)
In the research lab - these chemicals may not be used except under an air vent/ exhaust hood to ensure that we do not breathe them. I remember once the labs were closed when OSHA came in and things were not as they should be. In that case some people were eating in the (well vented) lab and desks were there. Also - some of the chemicals were in (closed) bottles but the bottles were not in the exhaust hood. Closed the lab down.
Same chemicals.
They were not safe then and they are not safe now.
Being able to expose your employees to chemicals should not depend on the industry. Banned in one should be banned in all.
Brian (New York, NY)
The fact that the EU bans most of the dangerous chemicals used in nail products while the US doesn't perfectly illustrates the corporate control of America. Even California is powerless to do something about it.
thomas bishop (LA)
"A growing body of medical research shows a link between the chemicals that make nail and beauty products useful — the ingredients that make them chip-resistant and pliable, quick to dry and brightly colored, for example — and serious health problems."

this reminds me somewhat of health problems from tobacco smoke--active smoking and second hand smoke--which we started to talk about in the 1960s (or earlier). we don't want to smoke in public because we expose the toxins to others, and in particular to workers at bars, cafes, casinos and restaurants. but if we want to smoke tobacco at home, and to use nail polish at home, it should be only a private risk (although children and spouses in the household might not know how to stand up for their interests).
David R (undefined)
No self-respecting person can patronize these salons any longer.
David Taylor (norcal)
It's tough to be an exceptional country. Many must be sacrificed for the profits of the few. By what other metric would we measure how exceptional we are?
Tom (South California)
Simple Solution
Ventilation. Install an exhaust fan.
Letitia Jeavons (Pennsylvania)
That would help but it might not be enough.
jj (California)
Sorry but a simple exhaust fan will not protect workers and clients form the effects of some of the chemicals used in nail salons. When those same chemicals are used in auto body shops, boat building and repair, etc. workers must wear respirators and protective clothing. Can't you just see nail salon workers donning such outfits?
Norman (Callicoon)
I have been in the furniture design and manufacturing industry for thirty years and have seen alarming practices across endless industries. Everything from grinding metal without a dust mask, spray painting factories that take your breath away just walking through the door and no one wearing a respirator, autobody repair workers sanding filler without a mask, same for woodworkers sanding and even Ground Zero rescue workers wearing dust masks improperly if at all. I could go on and on. When asked about protection a number of factory owners have shown me the masks that OSHA requires them to provide and the discarded cartridges that are unused but discarded by law. Thier employees do not like the discomfort of the masks. Perhaps OSHA should be running PSA's to inform people of the dangers of dust and chemicals in their occupations much the way the government has with cigarette smoking.
northlander (michigan)
Didn't we just hear something like this about similar chemicals in flooring, which was recently withdrawn from markets? But then we'd have to recall all those fingernails...
Shark (Manhattan)
'Cosmetics industry officials say linking the chemicals to manicurists’ health complaints amounts to faulty science.'

I seem to recall the tobacco industry claiming their product was safe for your health.

I hope these chemical companies get what they deserve.
georgiadem (Atlanta)
I wish Michael Bloomberg would leave the soda size alone and go after these modern day sweat shops. I thought the worker movements were started in NYC? What happened? Do you need a Shirtwaist Factory Fire to take action?
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
People who drink too much soda only hurt themselves (and even that is debatable). They don't harm OTHER people by drinking a Big Gulp.

On the other hand, the fumes from manicures affects all the workers and customers in a salon.
bluestar MD (NY)
bloomberg isnt mayor anymore....
Caffeine (The Great Plains)
I hate all these holier-than-thou comments like, "I hate nail polish, never use it, it's ugly, you're stupid if you paint your nails.". I happen to like the look of painted toes. It doesn't make me stupid. Do I want workers who apply nail polish to suffer health-wise? Of course not. I can do my own nails at home but a painted nail doesn't equal stupidity. It's a matter of personal preference like tattoos. I hate tattoos but I don't expect people to not get tattoos because I don't like how they look.
giulia873 (NY)
Agreed, but I think some of those comments are responding to the pressure some women feel to have painted nails, pressure possibly coming from their workplaces or from their social circles. I was raised to think I mustn't leave the house without makeup and painted nails, that it wasn't a choice. I have since rejected this notion.
Lisa Evers (NYC)
Yeah, but the holier than thou comments make sense in the ultra-PC environment in which we now live in the U.S. Like you, I love the look of polish, just as others might like jewelry, or fancy clothes, or as you point out, tattoos. Lots of jobs have their downsides, both physical and mental.... I don't see these nail salon workers making much effort to learn any English. If I were to move to a country where English is not widely spoken, but yet I can barely speak a word of the local language, should I be surprised when the only work I can get is a low-paying menial labor job?? That said, of course these salons need to have better ventilation, safer less toxic products, better pay etc.
Pilgrim (New England)
The fact that nail polish is applied to your fingertips and that you use your fingers constantly in your daily life is enough to take pause. The toxins that wear off of these resins end up in your body, where the poisons reside and build up.
I am always appalled to see little girls, (sometimes babies!) wearing lacquer on their tiny nails then see them sucking on their fingers.
Jennifer (Maryland)
I'm surprised by the comments suggesting that the women working in the salon industry either shouldn't have been born (because their parents should have used birth control), or shouldn't be having children. Both suggestions seem extremely callous to me, and reflect a belief in complete control over fertility that does not exist, even for women using fairly reliable methods of birth control. I would rather see the conversation focus on how to improve the industry and the lives of immigrants and their children.
RiskToWorkers (San Francisco, CA)
I'd like to echo the commenters who point out that the greatest risk of chemical exposure is to the WORKERS not the CLIENTS.

Improving ventilation in salons could help reduce this risk to workers. Gloves are unlikely to help because most disposable gloves are permeable to all of the solvents in these products. What, if any, level of risk is acceptable?

I am suspicious that the '3-free' and '5-free' products merely contain substitute compounds that are more poorly studied, but which will later prove to be similarly dangerous, especially when lists of ingredients are not readily available and when the polishes perform like the original versions. A few of these companies release ingredients lists, which is encouraging.

For the clients worried about their own beauty-related health risks, painting your own nails outdoors is a start.
walter fisher (ann arbor michigan)
I was the marketing manager for a well known chemical company that manufactured and sold all the many solvents used in laboratories throughout the world. I remember well how we protected our workers who made and packaged these chemicals from breathing them, in particular. Even for professional laboratory workers the labeling on these products are something to behold. The warnings on the labels are fairly scary. Every time I pick up my wife from one of these nail salons I marvel at the strong smell of solvents that these workers breathe every day. It is beyond speculation that some of these workers must be harmed by these solvents after so many years of exposure. I try to stop my wife from occasional using nail cleaners at home because of the awful odor of acetone and other solvents in these products. I have not been successful in this endeavor, however.
living in Manhattan (NY, NY)
Okay, so now many who have read this excellent series will stop patronizing these nail salons. But what will happen to all those women who work there? Where will they go next to support themselves and their children? Who will provide an alternative?
It will take more than individual boycotts to solve this problem. There need to be organized efforts to regulate them for safety and pay. And to find other, safer employment for the women trapped in them.
Suburban Resident (Maryland)
This is one of the many industries that is generating the demand for human-trafficking and illegal immigration. If there was other, safer employment then the women will most likely already be leaving the virtual slavery of a nail salon to work there.
manipadi (global)
I have been deeply saddened by the information this article has shared with the public. I am from Ecuador, so it's particularly saddening to me that many of the women profiled in the series are from my home country.

That being said, I don't know why people are crucifying women who opt to get manicures and pedicures. I get regular manicures and pedicures three times a month. While I choose not to polish (I buff), I certainly would not demonize women who choose to do so. Being a nail technician, while low-skill, is a respectable profession, and the answer, in my opinion, is not to sit on a high horse and judge women who like getting their nails done (what is wrong with it?), but to try to reward businesses you know do well by their employees (through business) and punish businesses you know do not (through business).

In Ecuador, I (and my mother and sister) pay $25 + tip for mani/pedi in cash, directly to my technician (who does house calls so she works in the comfort of my living room). When she finishes we usually offer her coffee and snacks. I do not feel like a terrible human being because we treat her with respect and she makes very good money. Treat your technicians with respect, pay them well, and the problem goes away. No need to demonize anyone except the unscrupulous business owners who exploit underprivileged women.
Independent (the South)
Perhaps even more at fault are the manufacturers of the products and their trade group.
GY (New York, NY)
There would be no article if:
- There was mitigation by salon owners of the risks from exposure to these chemicals by the use of some protective measures : Ventilation, worker breaks, development of less toxic products, use of alternative products even at a higher price;
- There was on the part of manufacturers and salon owners, a concern for the health effects on the workers, and information about the impact of the use of these chemicals and their health risks (no disclosures or educational materials are shown or shared in these salons); not much information for the consumers either;
- There weren't as many instances of egregious violations of labor laws (and heavy reliance on undocumented workers, ripe for exploitation and less likely to complain)

Hopefully as a result of this expose, both workers and consumers are more aware, and the manufacturers and salon owners are on notice.

The historical lack of enforcement and oversight of the industry is a story in and of itself.
Sony (Ohio)
Don't understand the comments that these women shouldn't have children. Every women has a right to have a child no matter what race. Even in a country that views them as nothing. Maybe having a child will bring them a tiny bit of happiness in their dust and fume cloud workplace. It's not their fault the salon owners and the beauty industry does not care about their health.
Jones (Florida)
Years ago I got artificial nails. The fumes were terrible, I felt nauseated, asked to use the restroom, and I saw that my pupils were very dilated! As soon as I breathed fresh air I felt better I have no idea what chemicals they used but never again.
FJM (New York City)
Poisons in the Nail Salon?

Then why aren't there mandatory regulations to protect both workers and the public? Why should these be voluntary?

Why are manufacturers allowed to sell toxic products?

What good is the Department of Labor, the FDA, etc?

Useless beaurocrats and politicians.
Tracy McQueen (Newark DE)
In the follow up piece called Three Things You Can Do, one option would be JUST DON'T get your nails done.
Jason (Brooklyn, NY)
I recently moved into an apt above a nail salon and in the winter when they keep their doors shut, my apt fills with their fumes. I've dealt with the miserable people in the department of environmental protection, who issued a report at 4 in the afternoon, when the salon wasn't even busy, that their air was very hazardous. Beyond the report, they didn't do a thing. Word of advice: don't rent an apt above a nail salon! I can only hope more and more articles come out about the hazards these places cause. There needs to be an industry standard for ventilation and air quality control.
Critical reader (VA)
I spent many years of my career as a research chemist in an R&D laboratory. Even as far back as the '80s it was common practice to limit the use if solvents such as formaldehyde and toluene and when there were no alternatives we always worked under fume hoods so there was proper ventilation. I'm afraid this is yet again a case of disparate treatment of better educated workers who are able and willing to speak up for our health and well being vs those with fewer job opportunities, skills, and language fluency who are consequently vulnerable to an essentially unregulated industry. OSHA is not doing their job here.
Uptown Scribe (Manhattan)
I know better than to go to the cheap salons. I do. I don't contribute to the garment slave trade by boycotting H&M, Forever 21, and such stores that sell flash fashions at prices too good to be believed. We all know why these retail items are so inexpensive - some individuals at the sewing tables paid the price for us.

Today I had the gel manicure on my fingernails removed at the Salon to extract myself from this shameful system. I was tempted to ask the Latina manicurist if she read this article but I didn't. I looked at the face of the Korean manager to imagine if she had and if she were disgruntled by our intrusive observations.

Looking at photos of where and how the manicurists live gave me so much information I never had but suspected and feared. By leaving this system do I put these vulnerable women in an even more vulnerable position? They'll lose their jobs, they may be in the US illegally and may be deported, so what's the right thing to do? These lives matter.
SES (Washington DC)
Rose, you're "really angry to see the Times go after the nail salon industry so viciously. Just since the first part of the article was published, many city friends have told me salon owners worry the story will directly affect their business - that customers will stop going. Is that what the three part series wants? For these shops to close? For their employees to go on welfare? Sure seems that way to me."

Rose, if the business is legitimate and the owner is a licensed, legitimate tax paying employer who treats employees according to the employment laws of New York City and can stand up to an audit, then that owner does not have to worry about losing any business.

This article is talking about SWEATSHOPS. It doesn't matter if they sew clothes or do nails. Sweatshops are illegal in this country and deserve to be put out of business and their owners criminally charged for "employing" people who are in reality slaves.

Los Angeles has been cleaning up its garment sweatshops. It's time for New York City to clean its nails.
Tony (New York)
And do the women customers who demand these nails and these services bear any of the responsibility?
GMR (Atlanta)
This is why I never get my nails done. Not only are the chemicals toxic to people, but their production, use and disposal are toxic to the environment. For me, it's a sign of self indulgent vanity that I just can't rationalize. I feel the same way about spraying the yard with pesticides. I'd rather not poison the dogs, cats, birds and other wildlife with whom we share a bit of green space.
ManhattanWilliam (New York, NY)
Listen, the exploitation of workers for the profit of business owners is appalling. Still, I simply do not understand WHY the laws we have on the books that prohibit these practices aren't sufficient to prevent them?! We have a licensing department that each manicurist is supposed to apply to for certification to work. We have job inspectors assigned to monitor adherence to current wage laws. Still, the best The Times can come up with to determine a valid business model is to lay it on the consumer who is supposed to "talk to the manicurist" at her place of business and ask if she's paid properly? Or better yet, merely "tip more"? WHAT IS WRONG HERE? WHY aren't the protections that ARE or SHOULD BE in place not working properly? THAT is what I want to hear about!
rjd (nyc)
Part II........Now that the lid has been blown off the sweat shop nail/spa industry here in NYC, thanks to a long overdue expose by the Times, shop owners city wide should be prepared for the backlash that will inevitably come to pass....and none too soon.
However before the City agencies (as well as the "loyal" customers) lower the boom on these human traffickers they need to be held accountable. Before they scramble and close up shop due to increased regulations, higher wages, and reduced demand they should be the ones who are forced to pick up the tab for all of their former employees who will now be unemployed.
For years these workers....many here illegally.....worked off the books and have no claim to either unemployment or health care benefits. And so, before the taxpayers are required to pick up the tab for thousands of exploited victims of this disgraceful industry, the owners of these businesses must be required to pony up to the cost of providing for the appropriate care and welfare of these people.
Just closing up shop and leaving town ain't going to cut it..........it's time for the owners to finally pay the piper.
Reuben Ryder (Cornwall)
Obviously, I do not understand the fascination. I sat across today from a woman talking on a cell phone. She mentioned that she was going to go have her nails done, fingers and toes. I thought, well, OK, but you should really try fixing your face and figure first, like get some exercise and some sun. Maybe she had been poisoned, too. It's all a matter of feeling important in some way, like one is privileged or something, even if it means you die a little quicker.
raph101 (sierra madre, california)
... and your opinion of this stranger's appearance and priorities is valid because of what, again? You're a man? Get over yourself.
MountainSquirrel (Western MA)
"I thought, well, OK, but you should really try fixing your face and figure first, like get some exercise and some sun."

Mr. Ryder, you should watch Inside Amy Schumer (particularly her parody of 12 Angry Men). It's none of your business what this woman does with herself. Stick to being concerned about the health of the workers profiled in the article before passing an unkind judgment.
Jennifer (NY)
My aunt was a hair stylist. After many years working with the different chemicals in her shop, she contracted pancreatic cancer and died. Although exposure to the chemicals on a periodic basis as a customer may not be unsafe, the longterm exposure is something else. These stories did not surprise me. It's something I wondered about every time I walked past a nail salon in the local mall and wanted to gag at the odor of the chemicals.
Clem (Shelby)
I'm amazed that these industry lobbyists and cosmetics execs can live with themselves, knowing that they are bribing democratically elected officials so they can keep poisoning poor women and babies in order to make a profit. I'm not young or naive. I know that the wicked prosper in this world. I realize that the lobbyists and CEOs and regulatory officials sleep soundly every night on satin pillows with full bellies. Yet I am still sometimes astonished at the degree to which people can do evil while convincing themselves they are good.
Melda Page (Augusta, ME)
And this type of corruption is prevalent in almost every type of American business. Profit and greed are supreme. The well-being of people matters not at all. America has never been a really good place, but now it celebrates its rottenness.
Adam Hedinger (Calgary)
Just capitalism at work ma'am. Greed. Just remember how dismissive the tobacco industry was of the fact that cigarettes were addictive and could lead to lung cancer. They knew the truth but had no intentions of telling us.
MissouriMan (MO)
It sounds so dramatic. But the article itself says that there is no resulting evidence really from teh current studies other than further study is needed. Are these women really affected by the fumes and contact or are they among a certain high risk group anyways. A good funded and totally encompassing study needs to be done with ALL pertinent data from corporations and health systems brought to the forefront. Are these women in a certain age group or a certain bracket that makes relatingtheir own personal health records as a one sided attempt or what? I don't doubt there can be a correlation to the solvents, but are they at risk any ore so than people walkign down the sidewalk or workign in a factory? It seemed the article was delving more into over-emotionalizing the sceanrios to get woemn ryled than actually stepping in with study related and medical data for facts.
Justice Holmes (Charleston)
Please, the health issues with these products in other settings is well known. No one is going to do the study you suggest because the industry done not want it done. The FDA used to require that a corporation prove that the profit was SAFE before humans were exposed but it would seen that now human health takes a back seat to profits and minimum wage workers now have to fund studies to prove the products are unsafe....wrong, wrong wrong.
Suburban Resident (Maryland)
The chemicals have already been tested, for decades in fact, and the tests have proven that they are dangerous and that precautions and safety measures should be utilized by workers who are exposed to them.
Joe (MN)
Imagine if the kind of self-regulation by industry groups was applied to criminal justice.

Judge: You stand accused of murder. Are you guilty or innocent?
Accused: I'm innocent, your honor.
Judge: OK then, you're free to go.
Lisa Chakan (Newburgh, NY)
The issue is slave wages and questionable sanitation. Women have been using nail products for centuries. Think: Cleopatra. When properly applied and maintained, nail cosmetics, just like facial cosmetics, are safe. Simply because something has an unpleasant odor, that doesn't make it toxic.

The salons discussed in these articles should be shut down. They are in violation of state and federal labor and immigration laws.
MadlyMad (Los Angeles)
The products women - like Cleopatra - used before the advent of clearly toxic ingredients were made from ingredients not made in a lab. One can and should be suspect of anything that is touted to be shinier, to last longer and is harder to remove. Granted, even natural ingredients can be toxic, but then they should eliminated as well. And let's not get into the cosmetic industries use of toxic chemicals in make-up, some of which have been proven to be carcinogens after they had been approved to be marketed. And this is after curel and torturous experimenting on animals. And what is it all for: a shallow need to beautify. These companies don't give a damn. At least, we should.
MarquinhoGaucho (New Jersey)
I didn't know why my sister, the beautician, never decided to have children. After I forwarded her these articles , she said it's 100% right. Almost all the women in her job who had children either suffered from numerous miscarriages before or when they did have children many had some sort of abnormality. Rather than risk her future child's health, she chose to remain childless.
AdaL (Los Angeles, CA)
Kudos to The Times for covering this long ignored issue. Perhaps a big reason why this issue has not caused an outrage for so long, is because it is effecting women, mainly, poor minority women. Add to the fact that getting one's nails done has been labeled as something that "just women do", so the "who cares what women do" attitude has sadly prevailed. Hopefully, this article will issue in much needed changes and outrages, but I am not holding my breath. Until there are lobbies for women and minority women instead of industry "with deep pockets", not much will change.
SES (Washington DC)
The article says, "Dibutyl phthalate, toluene and formaldehyde "have been found to be safe under current conditions of use in the United States,” said Lisa Powers, a spokeswoman for the Personal Care Products Council, the main trade association and lobbying group for the cosmetics industry."

Ms. Powers, I'd expect this comment from a man. From a woman who, as a lobbyist, would be paid thousands of dollars per year to defend the use of poison by workers and clients, this is unforgivable self serving arrogance.

I think it's time for spokeswoman Powers to spend a few months walking in the shoes of these underpaid workers, living with the manicurists and working in these nail salons for the low fees, tips and fumes. Then come back and tell us how safe these chemicals are. Shame on you and shame on the multibillion dollar cosmetics industry.
Justice Holmes (Charleston)
Dibutyl phthalate, toluene and formaldehyde and not been found safe for use by humans. Even the Chinese won't allow formaldehyde to be used in products but the US allows it it is criminal. As to toluene depending on dose it can cause problems with breathing, cognition, headaches, kidney damage and even death.
Karen (New York)
Why shouldn't men be held to these standards as well?
Adrienne (Boston)
My reaction was that we should invite Ms. Powers to step into a warm bathtub with those chemicals, and ask her how refreshing it feels. But I would say the same to whomever said such a ridiculous thing, no matter their gender.
Kate (Gainesville, Florida)
NPR recently ran a piece on the role of actress Tippi Hedren in starting the profession of manicurist among Vietnamese women refugees in California. Like so many instances of the "American Dream", many of the small businesses arising out of these ambitions succeeded by cutting corners on worker safety and wages. Those who advocate for more small businesses like these nail salons, and deride health and safety regulations imposed by the government need to acknowledge the human cost of this 'free enterprise' model of economic growth and individual success.
Valerie Wells (New Mexico)
I see salon workers bent to their task, with no more protection than a medical dust mask. This is insufficient to stop the inhalation of the fumes. If they were going to do so, then I would suggest wearing a full face mask with VOC ( Volatile Organic Compound) OSHA approved cartridges. Not only are they inhaling toxic fumes, but it also seeps in through the skin and the eyes. Toluene is a seriously dangerous solvent which goes directly to the liver. The body apparently is never able to rid itself of the toxin.
me not frugal (California)
One of the many things that bother me about the proliferation of cheap nail salons is the dismissive attitude that girls who have grown up with twice- monthly manicures take toward the workers in these shops. I've heard girls talk about their manicurists as if the women weren't human. (You can see some of the milder disrespect in one-star Yelp reviews.) There's nothing like hearing a 15-year-old, sporting French tips on fingers and toes, hate on the person who choked on fumes for an hour so Princess could look good in sandals.

I have never had a professional manicure or pedicure, which is rare among my milieu. The reasons are several -- including, in the case of pedicures, a tendency toward germophobia and fear of foot baths -- but chief among them is my reluctance to sit in a cloud of noxious fumes. On the rare occasion that I do paint my own nails, I do it outdoors or next to an open window. When I walk by a nail salon and see the banks of manicurists wearing dust masks, I wonder how they can breathe. I have always felt that way about nail salons. So I have to wonder how women and men can go into those shops every week or two and sit in the fume and dust cloud and not think about what it is doing to the workers (not to mention the harm to to themselves and the daughters they may bring with them). No person should be invisible to another human. Ever.

Buffed nails are the way to go.
ManhattanWilliam (New York, NY)
I frankly thought we had government agencies that provided oversight to these businesses! After all, as a consumer, we continually (and erroneously) rely upon these agencies to protect consumers AND workers. WHERE are they here? It doesn't seem appropriate to put the onus mostly on the consumer. If chemicals and such are being use that are harmful, why aren't the prohibited from being used? Where are the oversight agencies that should be monitoring salaries and business practices? I just don't understand this chasm where all protections (to workers, consumers) and oversight are being lost!
Melda Page (Augusta, ME)
Have you heard about the severe budget cuts the GOP has been imposing for quite some time?
Randall S (Portland, OR)
We DO have government agencies that oversee those kind of things, but there's just not enough funding. OSHA has about 1 compliance officer per 59,000 workers in the US.
ernieh1 (Queens, NY)
As a male, painted nails on a woman is a turn-off. I have never had a serious relationship with a woman who painted her nails. It was not because they did not paint their nails, but because they were the kind of woman whose sense of being beautiful did not require that they paint their nails. I would go even further. Of the numerous women and two wives in my past life, none of them used makeup.

The most appealing thing about a woman that I find, aside from being attractive women, is brains and a sense of humor.
Marion Teacher (Brooklyn)
Well thanks for sharing. Thank GOD we have a male perspective on this-- I wouldn't want to turn anyone off with my nail polish. Ladies, did you hear? "Brains and a sense of humor" are apparently incompatible with personal grooming.

You know what I find appealing in a man? A man who doesn't use an article about the exploitation and abuse of low-wage workers as a platform to brag about the "numerous" naturally attractive women in his past life and share his turn-ons and turn-offs. But maybe that's just me.
Karen (New York)
This series of articles addresses worker exploitation and unsafe working conditions. Not ernieh1's preferences regarding wives and girlfriends.
Andrea Reese (NYC)
What a self-righteous statement! What does your attraction to "natural" women have to do with the point of this article?
Erin (NYC)
The industry needs better regulation At Once.

I am so glad NYT has covered these issues and brought them to light.

However- as someone who works in fashion and travels to China/factories regularly- you should think twice about what you buy in general instead of patting yourself on the back for your non adorned nails. The treatment there is just as bad, there's chemicals everywhere as well.

That being said, while I do normally bring my own less chemical polish to a well run salon, I'm not totally guiltless, and this series will make me think twice before I go next time.

I must get pedicures- the last time I did one myself I ended up with an ingrown toe nail that had to be surgically removed- but I don't want to do it at the expense of another's health.

My colored nails are for me alone, I could care less if I attract a man, for all those trite "I prefer a natural woman" comments.
Jonathan Miller (France)
This is real journalism. Bravo. More like this please, NYT.
Bassey Etim (null)
Thanks for the compliment! The comments from readers in response to these stories have been fabulous, as well. We've prepared a run down of the most notable reader reactions on the Cityroom blog:

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/08/unvarnished-series-on-nail-salon-workers-readers-respond-in-english/


Thanks to everyone here for contributing to our online report.
Michelle (SF, CA)
I've never liked nail polish. The few times I tried it, it felt like my nails couldn't breathe. I much prefer natural nails.
swm (providence)
I completely relate; make-up makes my skin feel like it can't breath.
Peggy (Reno, NV)
They can't breathe. Polish on your toenails makes them more vulnerable to fungus. I got the toenail fungus. Got rid of it by taking expensive pills for 3 months. Now I admire my healthy toenails so much I don't want to put polish on them. But if you do use polish, you should do a one week on, one week off (to let the nails breathe).
Kelley Trezise (Sierra Vista AZ)
How can anybody be surprised by these results? I used to to to a stylist that also painted nails and could not stand the smell of the chemicals and stopped going there. But at least I warned them about the toxic fumes. They would open the door to air the place out but that was not enough for me and certainly not enough for them. Wearing a simple mask will do nothing, it needs to have a layer of activated charcoal to be effective.
SCA (NH)
By the time I was in my mid-teens I knew not to use that garbage. And I grew up in an era where the cool teenage girls went out with rollers under scarves cause they had to be gorgeous for Friday night, the heck with how they looked on Thursday...

I am bemused by the comments here from my fellow women, intelligent and sophisticated enough to read the NYTimes--*I only get my nails done for special occasions* or *it bothered me so much for the hour I sat there, I wondered how the poor workers stood it all day*--

Seriously. You are the problem. Why are you slaves to this fashion? Im not particularly dexterous but I can file and buff my own nails without supervision. Id rather save my money for pretty jewelry to wear on my hands rather than poison myself and the environment.

To repeat. You are the problem. Feminism got you nowhere. Neither did your educations. Neither will this story, if the prevailing opinion is *where can I buy safer nail lacquer*...
Erin (NYC)
Honestly, I am not trying to start a war, but I respectfully ask you to think twice about the jewelry you buy as well. I've been to jewelry and faux gem factories in China and those conditions aren't necessarily good for humans either. If you buy real jewelry that isn't mined/ blood diamonds then please ignore my comment :).
Caffeine (The Great Plains)
You make some good points but mean-spirited rants almost guarantee that most people will tune you out.
Rebecca (San Francisco)
Wow, maybe judgmental attitudes such as yours are the problem. If it were so easy as you say to not be a slave to fashion, to any degree, it wouldn't be a billion dollar industry. We don't need your judgment. The reason woman and girls buy into it is because of judgments and their fear of not belonging.
istriachilles (Washington, DC)
This is horribly tragic, and so profoundly unnecessary. Why do we need these ridiculous manicures and pedicures? Just paint your nails at home; the chemical exposure won't be enough to harm you. Of course, the companies should remove the chemicals from their products, but barring that, we should stop supporting this horrible industry. I just hope these women are able to find work elsewhere.
moosemaps (Vermont)
The cosmetic industry officials and lobbyists who have fought to keep these obviously harmful chemicals legal, and well-used, should be ashamed of themselves. So should the FDA and any other government organization that exists to supposedly protect Americans from toxic chemicals. We are so far behind European countries and Australia on this - why? Greed. Capitalism unchecked, without necessary safeguards. Shame shame shame. These women count. Keep them safe. And keep these toxic stews out of our water and off our shelves and off our bodies. Thank you for this important series.
John (Boston)
That is the beauty of Illegal workers, they are easy to exploit and they keep quiet.

My guess is the tax reporting by owners and workers (notice I didn't say employee, because I am sure many can't be bothered with payroll taxes) is on the light side also, unless of course there is an earned income tax credit or benefit to be had, then compliance goes up.
Paul King (USA)
Oh, we couldn't possibly REGULATE such businesses by requiring adequate ventilation units similar to those required in the Irish pubs for cigarette smoke years ago when I was there (quite effective - but now smoking is banned).

And we certainly couldn't have REGULATION of the multi billion dollar cosmetic industry as the late Sen. Ted Kennedy advocated thirty years ago (I watched him speak eloquently on the Senate floor).

Oh no, any attempt to do something in the interest of vulnerable Americans (ya know, tens of millions of women) would be OVER REACH and would further put government "on our backs" as the conservatives love to howl.

Is government on your back?
Pray tell, exactly how?
And taxes don't count.
Everyone on Earth pays taxes - except the elite who pull the strings of government for their own benefit.
Come On (USA)
Indoor air pollution is one of the most unrecognized and unacknowledged problems. Most of the time indoor air quality is much poorer than outside air. With my education I have found that Autism may be linked to chemicals in our environment, specifically smells, odors, fumes, and indoor air pollution. New mothers wear perfume, powders, hair spray, make-up, lotions, use air fresheners, etc. all of which their newborn baby inhales and ingests constantly all day long while being held by the mother. Think of the huge cloud of fumes and chemicals that just hairspray will leave in a bathroom and a connecting room. The fumes and chemicals in the air will last for hours being inhaled and ingested by anyone who comes near those rooms. And spraying air fresheners leaves the same huge cloud of chemical fumes. Using cleaners inside the house always produces toxic fumes and a large number of homes in the United States have radon poisonous gases constantly circulating through the home. Cooking also produces fumes and causes indoor air pollution.
This is a problem that needs addressing. Even as a patron of these salons I many times had a headache after leaving because of the extremely strong odor and fumes in those salons. Simply putting on nail polish produces fumes that are so strong that it causes my eyes water. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that when something is too smelly, gives you a headache, or makes your eyes water, it is toxic and harmful.
socanne (Tucson)
The passion for painted nails is something I've never understood. It has always struck me as a modern form of foot-binding. The implication behind both of these odd practices seems to be "see how well off I am? I don't need my hands/feet for work, and I am advertising that fact to the world (whether it's true or not.") Of course, in the case of foot binding in China, it was the parents of the girls who were having the binding done, not the girls themselves. But essentially, the same thing, no?
AP (Lindenhurst, NY)
No. Painting colors on your nails is not "essentially the same thing" as crushing bones and permanently disfiguring body parts.
Marion Teacher (Brooklyn)
Not really. Do you really think painting one's nails is commensurate with breaking the bones of one's foot and causing permanent injury, rendering oneself barely able to walk?
MountainSquirrel (Western MA)
No, not the same thing at all. I buy low-chemical, low-fume polish and paint my toes by myself. I think a flash of coral on my toes looks pretty in summer sandals, and if someone doesn't like it, that's fine by me. I do it for myself, believe me, my husband couldn't care less. Please don't make the plight of these workers worse by comparing a manicure to foot binding. It undermines the article.
SCA (NH)
Geez--forget about regulation. The government is not your friend and moves glacially to protect and defend its non-corporate citizens.

Use your brains. If it smells like rubber cement it doesn't belong on your body. If you are paying rock-bottom prices for a personal service in a stinking storefront full of non-white women who don't speak English, you know you are basically being pampered by servants who don't have union contracts.

If you buy it or patronize it, it will continue to be available. Boycott it and it wont.

I bet most of you commenters have smartphones and are on Facebook. Start a movement. It dazzles me sometimes--in poor countries people put their lives on the line to try to effect political change. My fellow American women cant take five minutes to get a *no poisonous exploitative nails for me* group going?
Yvette L. (Manhattan Beach, CA)
For many years I used to get acrylic nails. But, I stopped doing because between the strong chemical smells and the beating to my nails from drilling off the old acrylic and applying the new, it just didn't seem like a healthy thing to do. As an owner of a wellness company, I don't advocate getting a manicure or pedicure that involves using these harsh chemicals. Better to save the environment and the health of the patrons and workers.
kg (Washington DC)
Lobbyists who say that these chemicals are safe: Do you really need the money so much that you would perpetuate the use of these chemicals? How do you feel when you read about develomentally delayed 3 year olds?

Like so many sad or infurating news reports, the dirty money and influence in our political system is to blame for the FAILURE of our elected representatives to protect the health and safety of the people they supposedly represent.

They represent industry and corporations, insurance companies and it is despicable.

Campaign Finance Reform now!!
Anne (NY)
If this article achieves nothing more than to prick our consciences about utilizing these services, and contributing to an abusive situation, that will be a good start.
DSS (Ottawa)
Republican response: Well that's the risk you take for choosing such a job - live with it.
Ziggle (Colorado)
There was no mention of workman's comp insurance in this story -- why? Since the FDA is handcuffed, a tsunami of workman's comp claims could more quickly begin to make a difference: when your carrier tells you that you can only have coverage if you have (and use) adequate ventilation, require staff to wear masks and gloves, and stop using certain chemicals, you have to take action. And if the shops don't have workman's comp, they should be shut down.

And where is OSHA in all of this? Even if the FDA doesn't have the authority to regulate cosmetics, OSHA certainly has the ability to set limits on workplace exposures. Where are they?
Mary (Chicago)
Yea, I highly doubt the shops have workman's comp insurance. Shutting them down would require investigation and enforcement. Given what was reported in yesterday's article about the low/nonexistent pay given to many of these workers and the lack of enforcement there, I'd imagine it's the same for worker's comp. Even if the owners do have it, the employees have to know about it and be willing to press a claim.

The article mentions where OSHA is: under current standards, the shops are largely legal, and there are processes OSHA has to follow in setting new standards. Even if they do try to set new standards and the standards make it through the administrative rulemaking process, they will likely be challenged in court. It's not a quick fix, which doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done, but there's more that can be done in the meantime.
jj (California)
The FDA polices the products involved here. It is up to them to force the industry to use more chemically friendly ingredients. OSHA deals with the workplace environment and there is no way they can police every nail salon in the country. There are just too many of them.
LostinEurope (Germany)
"Of the 20 common nail product ingredients listed as causing health problems in the appendix of a safety brochure put out by the Environmental Protection Agency, 17 are hazardous to the respiratory tract, according to the agency. Overexposure to each of them induces symptoms such as burning throat or lungs, labored breathing or shortness of breath."

The operative word here is overexposure. If you used home cleaning products day in and day out for years, without adequate protection, you would become overexposed and develop lung problems or skin allergies.

The EPA and the Nail Manufacturers Council recommend that manicurists wear gloves and have either an air extraction system or a professional air filtration system - yet few salons are willing to make this investment. This is the main issue here and it ties in with the NYC's article on salons in New York and the exploitation by nail salons of their workers. This is like coal mining in the 1900's - exploitation and with no safety equipment!

Nail polish has contained dibutyl phthalate, toluene and formaldehyde since the 1930's - yet after 80 years there is still no scientific evidence that any of these ingredients are a health risk!
llaird (kansas)
If you must go to the toxic nail salon for pampering you might consider taking your own water based, non toxic nail polish, base coat and remover. I use Honeybee Garden products. Don't forget to wear a mask since you're entering an unsafe breathing area. Or perhaps you could get a similar good feeling about yourself by doing some work with a local charity.
Kristen (NY)
This is why we need you, New York Times!
curtis dickinson (Worcester)
The times have changed. Now NYC is inundated with manicurists who are inhaling these chemicals daily, 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. It's like inhaling 2nd hand cigarette smoke--back in the day. But these chemicals are causing miscarriages and deformed babies--like thalidomide caused deformed babies--back in the day. And Europe has banned these chemicals. It's time for OSHA to clean up the workplace, and the FDA to update their regs.
A Different Observer (seattle)
I was just about to try a gel manicure because I thought a friend's looked so nice, and they seem to last. Now I'm going to give up my standard pedi.

Money buys laws in this country. Cosmetics industry v. low-income, immigrant women? We all know who will win in that lopsided match-up.

Republicans want the free market to solve such problems, but when one party is completely powerless and the other has money to line the lawmakers' pockets, the market isn't really operating in an "invisible hand" kind of way. Economic theory requires available substitutes: if the workers had other jobs to substitute for the nail work, they would take it, the cost of getting nails done would go way up, and someone would innovate a great way to do nails in a safe way. But the perfect Republican theoretical world, the one that allows them to sleep at night while banking their lobbying funds, does not exist.
herron2 (ny)
Wow.
Not only do Gels and acrylic nails damage your nails; they endanger the lives of the workers. Time for development of non-toxic nail products. Has OSHA been involved? This can cripple the Nail industry as clients re-think getting their nails done or purchasing polish, remover, etc.
barbL (Los Angeles)
Maybe some industries should be crippled.
SCA (NH)
OK, look. I don't have a college education. But I do have a brain, and have always tried to use it. I read labels, I think about information I am given--I don't just swallow it whole. I don't have a simple childish hope that my government is my friend. I don't believe that just because something is available in the marketplace, that's an imprimatur of safety.

If it stinks like rubber cement and Wite-Out, its really not going to be safe to layer on any of your body parts. We don't need the NY Times to tell us that. If you are paying a teeny amount of money to have your hands toxified by a brown-skinned woman who cant speak English, its likely she doesn't have health insurance and a union contract.

And for the commenters saying *but what work will they do if we close salons?*--change takes time. When certain societies learn there is no labor market for their millions of uneducated poor people, they will slowly start to limit population. Do you really think we can find good safe dignified jobs for the surplus workers of Cambodia, Vietnam, the Philippines and South Korea?

Responsibility begins with the individual. If a mother knows her daughters will grow up to have two or three job choices--prostitute, maidservant or sweatshop--but keeps having children, the problem lies with her. Birth control is available in most countries.

My aching fellow readers--we cant save every individual. But we can help create positive economic changes that might help many..
Paul Klenk (NYC)
I've always wondered whether it's safe to bite my nails. I mean, I spit them out, of course. (I don't use polish.)

Maybe the natural look with catch on, and women will be pleasantly surprised when men still like them without cartoon-colored fingernails. Or cartoon-decorated ones (emoji, really?). Or nails that don't match their bags, their beach towels, and their dog leashes.

Me, I like a girl's eyes.

Ladies, don't bite your nails if you paint them.
AP (Lindenhurst, NY)
Why do you assume the only reason women do their nails is so men will like them?
br (midwest)
Manicured nails need to become a stigma as opposed to a fashion statement, as fur has become in so many communities. As a man, I don't consider manicured nails on a woman to be attractive, and I'm guessing that most men feel the same. Frankly, I think that they look silly. Women, I think, have their nails done to impress other women. One whiff of these chemicals (I once worked in an office adjacent to a nail salon and the odor was sometimes overpowering) should be enough to know, but the public needs to be educated. These chemicals are dangerous, the workers in this industry are being exploited and so manicured nails are an overt sign that you are subsidizing health problems and exploitation. This sort of education and public campaign will do more to solve the problems than any amount of government regulation.
pulsation (CT)
Manicured nails or painted ones? They do not mean the same thing. Nail polish is applied after the manicure.
Lisa Evers (NYC)
Yes, let's now stigmatize all women who wear polish, whether she applied it at home or went to a salon, or whether the polish is organic or full of chemicals. And while we're at it, let's stigmatize all people we see wearing clothing, whether they made their clothes at home or bought them from a store that in turn ordered them from a wholesaler who in turn had them made at a sweatshop.
s (San Diego)
Years ago - in the mid 80s - I went into a nail salon to have a manicure while preparing to attend a wedding. I quickly walked out - my eyes were burning. The air was filled with noxious, toxic-smelling chemical fumes, bringing on an instant headache. I couldn't imagine any customers willingly subjecting themselves to the obvious health risks, but many were there. I wondered how they were able to hire any manicurists. I never went back. Fortunately, I have a strong sense of self-preservation. One would think this to be a universal way for humans to avoid self-destruction, but apparently in many others vanity is the stronger drive.
Thi (NYC)
Thank you for covering this story for a group of marginalized Americans who otherwise have no voice. My mom has worked in nail salons for nearly two decades in order to support a family of five despite speaking no English and coming to this country in her 40s. For those suggesting that these women just leave this profession, I would like to point out that the majority of them are low-skilled, immigrants with limited English abilities and hence very few economic opportunities. We shouldn't question why they are choosing to remain in this profession but rather why this industry is so unregulated and why there are so few viable opportunities for the vulnerable masses that immigrate here in the hopes of leaving behind their war-devastated homes for a chance at stability.
SCA (NH)
Well gee Thi, maybe the problem is a family of five in the first place.

Low-skilled people--men and women--of little economic opportunity need to limit their families to one child who can perhaps achieve a better life than they had. I don't say this from a position of privilege, but as someone whose ancestors came here--not so long ago--as impoverished immigrants with no English skills. Their children and grandchildren had smaller families than they did and entered the non-professional middle class.

In founding a womens center overseas, I learned that the only people who succeeded were the ones who made intelligent choices, even against prevailing custom.
Richard (New York)
I think actually the minimum people could do is make sure that the nail polish and other chemicals are safe. If people have to work hard, and get paid low wages, that is the story of most immigrants unfortunately.

They should at the very least get compassion, so that their health is not compromised.
A Reader (Detroit, MI)
If you can stop your sanctimonious finger-wagging for a moment, I would like to ask you what you propose people do about the children that they ALREADY have? Since when did working to support one's family become a dishonorable thing?
Maureen O'Brien (New York)
I never liked "nail polish" -- apparently, a good thing. Now we learn it poisons the people working with this stuff -- I am wondering what it is doing to the people who are wearing it.
SCA (NH)
As far as the exploited illegal immigrant workers go--I learned from years of living, working and founding a womens center in a third-world country extremely repressive to women that people can and must solve their own problems. The girls and women who succeeded were the ones who refused to take *no* for an answer, from mothers-in-law or anyone else.

Even in places notorious for religiously-mandated patriarchy, strong women even from poor and uneducated families were able to demand choices. The world has been here for a long time. The people who succeed are the ones who go against prevailing thought and custom, and find a better way.

These immigrant women know these are horrible jobs. Their lives wont be fixed by a bunch of white women anguishing over a NY Times story. Did all of you really need a reporter to tell you that cheap manicures in stinking storefronts mean exploitation? You didn't realize that a salon full of women who cant speak English might hint to something really ugly?

Grow up, all of you.
N.G. Krishnan (Bangalore, India)
Talking of nail polish reminds me of equally, if not more dangerous use of hair dye, especially in poorly regulated developing countries like India.

Hair dye consumption is not an uncommon means of intentional self-harm.. Paraphenylene diamine poisoning was the number one cause of poisoning. Numerous case reports have been reported from India.

The ammoniacal dye solution and the hydrogen peroxide solution, the developer, are mixed shortly before application to the hair which causes the hair to swell and the dye intermediates (and preformed dyes) penetrate the hair shaft to some extent before they have fully reacted with each other and the hydrogen peroxide and formed the hair dye.

Progressive hair dye products contain lead acetate as the active ingredient. Lead acetate is approved as a color additive for coloring hair on the scalp at concentrations not exceeding 0.6% w/v, calculated as metallic lead . Bismuth citrate, the other approved color additive, is used to a much lesser extent. Progressive hair dyes change the color of hair gradually from light straw color to almost black by reacting with the sulfur of hair keratin as well as oxidizing on the hair surface.

Dye containing paraphenylene diamine is usually the cause of kidney failure in India. However, there are very few published reports on this fatal issue associated with hair dye ingestion, a pathetic situation indeed.
Michele (New Mexico)
How did the author manage to get candid interviews from the manicurists in the salons without interference from the owners? I would think the owners would be upset at this expose. I wish there was also a Vietnamese version of these articles so I can pass it along to my manicurist, who doesn't wear gloves or a mask and probably is not aware of the health risks because she is too busy and tired trying to eek out a living for herself and her young daughter.

In the 70's, it was the sweat factories for most Chinese immigrants. Saddest part is that these people exploit their own kind to the nth degree.
bluestar MD (NY)
There is no question that better working conditions and apprpriate pay are necessary. It is possible- but not proven at all- that these women are at higher risk for a variety of ailments. Let's get the research done correctly. hysteria and fear mongering based on anecdotes is not approrpiate either.
Suburban Resident (Maryland)
Research costs money, and research that's done under stringent enough conditions to withstand the defensive attacks of the chemical industry costs even more. In order to justify spending the money on research to prove or disprove something, a valid possibility must first be proposed. These anecdotes that you sneer at are potentially a very serious industrial danger that must be investigated. By the way: I worked on the National Toxicology Study of toluene back in the 1970s, and it was scientifically established then how harmful that substance is, but it's still used in massive quantities because the chemical industry has been claiming for decades now that it's 'safe'.
statuteofliberty (Philadelphia)
I have chemicals in my house for refinishing furniture with all sorts of warnings about ventilation and inhalation on them. I wear a respirator when I use them. Nail polish and related products have many of the same chemicals, but no warnings. Walk into any nail salon and the fumes can knock you off your feet. No ventilation. Occasionally, the workers are wearing dust masks, which is useless for the fumes. It is time OSHA steps in and sets workplace rules and some regulatory body (California, where are you?) demand warnings on the products themselves.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Nail polish and all professional nail products do contain warnings, for example the Irritant symbol. Also it is a legal requirement for each nail salon to have a copy of the Material Safety Data Sheet that relates to each product they use. This document provided by the manufacturer, contains a lot of useful information concerning ingredients, toxicity, disposal recommendations, usage recommendations, storage etc. However, salons that exploit workers are unlikely to either read the MSDS or share them with their workers.
Juliana (California)
I have nail products in my home, and ALL of their labels recommend ventilation,and other safety procedures. Never have I seen a nail product without the warnings.
S.T. (Amherst, MA)
I commend the NYT for this series of investigative reports. For me, the issue is not the existence of beauty parlors/salons - those exist to fill a need, for the workers who have a trade and need a job, and for the customers who can afford to enjoy the luxuries that are offered. The issue are, as pointed out in part 1, that every worker has the right to a decent wage and dignity in their work, and in part 2, to working conditions that will not make workers sick. One aspect of this is the toxicity of the products themselves - when companies insist that levels of harmful chemicals are very low, they are almost certainly talking about consumers who use these occasionally, and not about providers who are exposed to them every hour of the working day. The industry standard needs to account for these people - and this should be enforced through greater oversight, stronger legislation, better enforcement. And none of this can happen without action from those of us consumers who are outraged by these practices to question them. We can all begin by not buying or using harmful products and by not frequenting salons that exploit their workers. The tips the NYT provides do not go far enough, in my opinion, but are a start: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/08/nyregion/3-ways-to-be-a-socially-consc...
grannychi (Grand Rapids, MI)
So, whom are we going to vote for-- politicians who are determined to enact legislation to protect workers and the public, or politicians whose mandate it is to destroy the protections which are currently in place?
Don McQuiston (Sedona, Arizona)
I'm a guy, so what do I know, but the female face and hands so overdone with strange colors is not very becoming. The models used in the TV commercials for these products look grotesque. Why would anyone want to have talons for fingernails. Acetone (polish remover) is so powerful, a paintbrush used in enamel paint and not cleaned and allowed to dry for months can be cleaned in minutes when soaked in acetone. Think what that does to your skin. When chemical products smell really bad and toxic, it's because they are.
BAV (Miami)
Worse noxious fumes come from Keratin treatments that are all the rage now, and take literally hours to do. You literally can't breathe from the fumes.
Many salons do both acrylic nails and Keratin and have poor ventilation.
Choose your salons carefully.
Caro (New York, NY)
I try to only use a nail polish called Kure Bazaar, 85% chemical free and organically produced...I buy it in France but you can find it online. I take it to the salon with me.
LostinEurope (Germany)
Organic is a con term used by dubious product manufacturers. No nail product is organic in the sense that it is derived from happy plants! Organic in the strict sense means the chemical formula contains carbon, like automotive gas, and is usually derived from petrochemicals.

Water is a chemical. For a product to claim it is 85% free is also total nonsense. What can it be made of if it is not a chemical?
Anne (NY, NY)
Interesting how many of the comments are an excuse for criticizing and ridiculing women, Why not focus on the real issue - for example, why does OSHA say the workers are safe? And for the record, I rarely get my nails done.
St. Paulite (St. Paul, MN)
What we are seeing here is yet another failure of regulation. It is horrifying that in the U.S. in 2015, people are regularly exposed to dangerous chemicals, working in conditions that are toxic to their health, at places where they are paid virtually nothing in some cases, as we read in yesterday's article. As always, the business gets to decide what happens, and the (mostly immigrant) workers get to be the canaries in the coal mine until, eventually, something just might be done. One would hope that the clients would demand better ventilation systems and less-dangerous products in the nail salons. Until that happens, a boycott would be in order. Spread the word - share these articles with friends!
Rev. Jim Bridges (Arlington, WA)
When did it become acceptable for spokeswomen and men of professional business organizations to lie and tell falsehoods regarding the health safety of their products? It is as bad as the Fraternal Order of Police leaders always siding with the police in any charge against the police officers. Must we always view such spokespeople with suspicion?
ParksideDame (San Francisco, CA)
I hope your series improves conditions for these workers. I get pedicures here in San Francisco; for manicures, though, I skip the polish. The women are mostly Vietnamese, seem to work just part time so that they can care for their kids, and they appear bright and happy. Some go to school too. I am glad to see that they wear gloves and sometimes masks. Basic mani-pedis are not too cheap--around $30 plus tip, and this price varies across San Francisco (I'm in a more moderate neighborhood). But I am aware of this issue, and I talk to manicurists who work on me.
Adrienne (Boston)
$30 is nothing for a mani-pedi. Think about the math. If these women are lucky, they are getting half that for an hour's labor. Likely they are getting a lot less. I pay $63 for just a pedicure. I used to feel that this was a lot, but after going to some other spas and seeing what those workers seemed to put up with, I went back to the expensive salon. I also feared that if they were cutting corners on staff, they might be cutting corners on keeping things clean. One place they were even rude to the staff, yelling at them from across the room. I might not speak that language, but I'm not deaf. I don't use nail polish, just a buff, and am now even happier I don't, for me and the people working on my feet. I would do them myself but have trouble because of abnormalities in my feet.
DrB (Brooklyn)
Keep on kidding yourself!
Rochelle (Perth, Australia)
If you are paying $30 for mani-pedi, that is cheap! Chances are the worker is getting little more than the tip for her work. As in so many service areas, our enjoyment of "cheap luxury" comes at great cost to workers on poverty incomes.
Anne (Portland Oregon)
Pedicures, especially for older folks, can be very therapeutic, and when properly done, will prevent things like ingrown toe nails, and will relieve discomfort from callouses, and dry skin.
The same goes for a well done, plain manicure sans polish.
The fake fingernail industry is simply unnecessary...and pretty silly.
All the chemicals used and the process have always reminded me of the original surfboard manufacturing from 50 years ago. It is all much the same stuff!
AlternativeView (Virginia)
I don't live in New York and I usually only splurge on a professional pedicure on occasion as the going rate here is about $40, plus tip. However, after reading this, I won't be visiting any nail salons until extreme measures are taken to reform this industry. It's easy enough to buy the tools and take care of your own hands and feet.

Btw, I'm very disappointed by a number of commenters who seem to be missing the point. The first reaction should be alarm and sadness for the exploited workers in this industry. Not fear over what you might be exposed to by spending an hour in a salon as a patron or simply walking past a salon entrance. The risk to you is minimal, while they suffer cancers, skin diseases, miscarriages and more quite commonly. It is my hope that patrons will read this article and stop supporting this exploitive industry. Vanity is not worth another's life.
LostinEurope (Germany)
There are professional nail salons in the USA that meet the industries recommended best practice guidelines - such as the use of a mask, gloves, air extraction/filtration equipment and sanitation. However, few of these are on the high street and none offer the discount prices many are willing to pay.

I work in this industry and our biggest concern for years has been that the discount salons are damaging the health of both their workers and customers (due to poor sanitation) that will result in all nail salons getting a bad reputation.

Hopefully these excellent articles from NYT will open the eyes of both salon customers and the inspectors who should be doing their jobs!
AlternativeView (Virginia)
I'd be willing to pay the appropriate price for a pedicure at a salon that doesn't exploit immigrant workers (or any, for that matter) and in which sufficient safety precautions are employed to protect workers from the devastating effects of exposure to toxic chemicals. If there are indeed a few salons that meet these conditions, I'd love to know how to spot one (i.e., which questions to ask and what to look for).
amycurzi (chicago)
BTW, I think YOU are missing the point. Your manicurist, who depends on you paying her wages by paying for the pedicure, has lost a customer. She has lost wages and your tip. You have done nothing to make her life better. I don't know how to get the FDA to amp up it's controls and get it's laws in line with Europe, but doing your own nails/feet is only going to hurt the income of these immigrant women.
grannychi (Grand Rapids, MI)
And potential effects of putting polish on young children's nails, when the children are of an age to put their fingers in their mouths, or chew their fingernails?
The Buddy (Astoria, NY)
These two articles on the abuses of the manicure industry were outstanding. Now, what is the game plan for reform?
Lee (Atlanta, GA)
Thank you NYT for looking at this industry - this is really journalism at it's best.

Amazing what we will excuse in pursuit of vanity - from slave labor conditions to exposure to dangerous chemicals. Leaving nail salon workers a "big tip" does not make this situation OK by any means.

If you care about your nail lady then make it clear to the ownership that you demand standards - employees should be wearing masks at a minimum. Look for the signs and let them know that your business comes with strings attached.
Michelle (Cupertino)
Can not agree more on the excellent journalism of these reports--it is the backbone and consciousness of a society.

As for myself, I do not plan to patron the nail salons any more. I hope that the workers in the industry can fight to leave it too, even though it can be difficult. Learn a life-support technique that is not life-taken.
LostinEurope (Germany)
As a minimum, every nail salon should be equipped with air extractors over each nail table. That is the industry recommended guideline.
linda cleary (Springfield)
The overpowering fumes keeps me out of nail salons.
Socrates (Verona, N.J.)
If there were any doubts that the United States has descended into an unregulated 3rd world Robber Baron paradise, this article should help dispel your doubts.

Poor female slave laborers routinely subjected to dangerous, unregulated working conditions with zero government oversight, interest or seeming ability to exercise the slightest bit of mild regulation.

Welcome back to Dickensian England American style.
Discernie (Antigua, Guatemala)
I'm sorry but this is only the tip of an iceberg that hides beneath the surface. The true culprits are the big petroleum industry conglomerates who have protected their highly distilled products like xylene and toluene for more than 60 years from objective research into the health hazards of these products.

It's not just respiratory injuries and systemic sickness causing harm to fetuses, it's cancer (principally leukemia) and brain damage equivalent to repetitive concussions we know about today.

As a Texas products liability lawyer, I successfully pursued cases against the petrochemical companies for brain injuries and cancer derived from exposure to industrial epoxies with high lift-off distillates. The research results ARE there but offset by politicized studies that suggest these chemicals are safe to use. Scientific opinion is bought and paid for 100X over by Exxon, Shell, etc.

The brain damage cases go unreported because the workers so harmed turn to drugs and alcohol to self-treat their high anxiety and mental confusion.

Our culture has worshipped at the feet of Big Oil for so long that true understanding of the dangers of even the most mundane eg. gasoline has yet to be achieved.
In my research and experience, painters and adhesive workers are almost all moderately brain damaged AND do not forget the great majority of these workers are physiologically ADDICTED to the "high" involved in their work.

They can't think about another job. A catch-22 so sad.
barbL (Los Angeles)
I've used acetone and benzene in my art work and now use cyanoacrylate glue for some things.
The door is open to the outside and the fan is on. The materials are sealed immediately after being used and then put again in a zip-lock bag and stored in a drawer or other bag. They are never used unless all family members are out of the house: I work at home.
This is equivalent to the standard that nail salons should be forced to have, plus acknowledging the danger in their products to both clients and workers. If it "can't be done" just close them down. We are talking about not just present lives, but the lives of unborn children here.
Pretty is just not worth this price.
Discernie (Antigua, Guatemala)
I would recommend a air shield helmet with a hose to fresh air. It forces fresh air from outside down from your forehead over your face so that you are much better protected under your circumstances. Not too expensive really. Carry on and take care to avoid skin contact. Best wishes.
Flagburner (Larkspur CA)
I have gotten one pedicure in my 52 years~ I recall wanting to help the woman kneeling at my feet back to hers; and apologize for my part in her enslavement .
Fake/painted nails strike me as a chauvanistic phenom, where women feel they must be a vamp or be overlooked.
The whole thing stinks .
Darchitect (N.J.)
phthalates are known to cause serious problems for premature babies in the Neo Intensive Care unit...phthalates which impart fexibility to artificial fingernails does the same for plastics used for intubation of infants... It is interesting that the tubes weigh less when removed from the infants than when
first inserted....The difference is in the lost phthalates from the plastic...lost in the infant....The exposure is harmful...For a clear study see the December 2014 issue of Perinatology Journal.
Sarah Hwang (South Korea)
This question always comes up to my mind whenever I read articles about corrupt politicians and lobbyists: How could the leaders of a nation be so stupid enough to give up their integrity for such insignificant things-in this case lipsticks and nail polish!-while a single article delivers accusations for corrupt corporations mentioning their very names?

Guess I'm not going for Estee Lauder or OPI anymore. Great article!
FashionDoctor (Portland,OR)
In the environmentally conscious northwest, we have "green" dry cleaners and organic lawn services. Yet, nail salons proliferate. We take care to separate our lunch trash into biodegradeable, compostable, recyclable, and landfill. Meanwhile, our Vietnamese manicurists and their customers breathe in a lethal cocktail of solvents and acrylic dust. Manicurists and salons display their cosmetology licenses. Yet, no agency regulates the salon environment. Parents take parties of young children for mani/pedi birthday parties or bring their toddlers to the salon every other week while they get their manicures and pedicures. Don't get me started on the tanning salons that are next door to the nail salons!
Hpw is it that the EPA regulates the chemicals and smoke that are sent into the air and groundwater by industry BUT there is no regulation for beauty salons? Amazing! It took the Times 35 years to make a report on this - equally shocking!
Diane B (Boston)
Great comment, we'll said and I second every point you've made!
br (midwest)
Instead of regulating this industry, we should all do our part to educate people about the dark side. When we see someone with gussied-up nails, we should make it a point to, politely, point out that the chemicals are health hazards and the workers are being exploited. And we should keep doing this until fancy nails are no longer considered fashionable.
NoScreenName (NY)
Interesting series, great reporting.
Whenever I'm bombarded by Komen's scorched-Earth marketing, Pink Ribbon Breast Cancer "Awareness" nonsense - and all their 'running and walking for the cure' absurdity - I wonder why it is in this country that so many of us bathe ourselves in the toxic chemicals that CAUSE these tragedies in the first place?
It seems rather simple doesn't it? We've spent the last 40 or 50 years eating processed junk out of boxes and speeding through fast 'food' joints to save 'time;' appointing our homes with manufactured floors, carpets, window coverings and upholstered pieces that reek of poison; creating perfect lawns with deadly pesticides; spending hours in pungent salons in search of hair and nail perfection all so that we can hold our own in a society whose beauty standards are ever-rising.
All of it coincides with the maturity of America's behemoth advertising industry, which has spent decades pummeling us with the notion that everything must be a certain way.
While other countries are eliminating chemicals and GMOs, and don't incentivize garbage like corn syrup, we here in the U.S. -'The Greatest Country In The World'- bow to Big Food, Big Pharm, and every lobbyist, poisoning ourselves at every possible turn.
While some progress is being made and it has been heartening to finally see the wind go out of McDonald's etc as social media has finally awakened people - it sure is still pretty shameful what we've done to ourselves.
DJS (New York)
Do you know how to construct your own floor,walls,windows and carpets?
I sure don’t. I don’t get my nails or hair done. This is not going to protect me from the toxins that my home, the poison the government drops on my area periodically to prevent against West Nile Virus,
I was raised Orthodox and Kosher.I’ve never eaten in a fast food joint in my life.
My sister has metastatic colon cancer and breast cancer. She’s never eaten that kind of food either.She doesn’t get manicures,pedicures,get her hair done,eats healthfully and is a runner and exerciser.
It must be the carpet.
Jeannie (<br/>)
There are salons that use non-toxic, healthy, organic products in their treatments. They aren't that hard to find if you do a little homework. I've been going to one for the past few years in my neighborhood, and Its prices are comparable to the toxic places.
SCA (NH)
Jeannie: There is no healthy non-toxic way to lacquer up your nails like a car body. Stop fooling yourself. Certain products aren't appropriate to be layered onto the human body. That's just the way it is.
Wayne A. Spitzer (Faywood, NM)
Turpentine is "organic", it comes from trees. Does that make it safe? I mean seriously, just because a solvent or a chemical occurs naturally in plants does not mean it is safe and in fact lots of "natural" chemicals can kill you, and just because a solvent or chemical is produced synthetically does make it dangerous. A chemical is a chemical no matter what its origin, and the relative safety of each one has to be judged independently.
Robin (Westchester NY)
Dry cleaners too. Every time I walk into a dry cleaner (not that frequently), I wonder about the health of the workers, and the chemicals that will be in my clothes, up against my skin after the dry cleaning. We really don't need to dry clean our clothes (... maybe a special occasion outfit worn very infrequently), nor paint our nails. Big tipping made me feel OK about getting my nails done, but these articles have certainly shattered that notion.
Trudy (Pasadena, CA)
A lot of people just drop their laundry off for regular washing.
Yoda (DC)
This article needs to place the blame where it is really due - the clientele of these establishments (i.e., women).
Maureen O'Brien (New York)
Do not forget the owners, either.
Vlad (Chicago, IL)
It's OK. This how the free market is supposed to work, right?

"These people" know what they're getting into. They can vote with their feet and leave the jobs if they were that dangerous. They obviously think the pay they're getting is fair for the low level humiliating work they do. The government shouldn't interfere with Courageous Small Business Owners that fulfill such a crucial part in our economy. And God forbid if we imposed unnecessary regulation on the cosmetics companies - it will bring America down!
Diane B (Boston)
Environmental Working Group is working on our behalf to educate the public on the toxins that are in cosmetics. This is the next subject the nyt should report on.
Malcom Wy (New York)
Who would allow a company to make a chemical product for mass distribution without requiring it to prove that it was safe first? Sounds pretty obvious. But that's exactly what's happened over and over again for a century now. It's time for common sense to catch up to capitalism. Anyone who thinks an industry can self-regulate needs to study their history. There will always be jobs at stake, but we should choose lives over jobs.
PBS (NY)
Who would allow a company to dump chemicals in water; who would allow a company to put harmful additives in food; who would allow a company to expel chemical-smoke into the air? Lastly, ask, who are the lobbyists and who is congress?
LostinEurope (Germany)
This is not true. All chemical and cosmetic products must be supplied with a Material Safety Data Sheet that includes toxicology data.
Kelley Trezise (Sierra Vista AZ)
There is a tremendous range of toxic chemicals that must be used industrially. The criteria that it should be safe is a non-sequitur. If handled in a proper manner the chemical might be used safely, that is all that matters. There are probably finishes that do not use toxic solvents that might substitute for the presently used materials but getting people to use them will be a fight. Water based paint is safer than the old petroleum based paints.
rjd (nyc)
An outstanding expose on the nail industry here in NYC. What intrigues me the most are the many comments by the readers (mostly women obviously) that they are shocked to learn of all of these atrocities.
For years they have been going into these places several times a month. They loved getting the full treatment at dirt cheap prices. Apparently, they never engaged their beleaguered service provider in conversation nor did it ever occur to them that in NYC (of all places) how is it possible to get such service at 3rd world prices? Unfortunately, in many cases, they left a meager 10% tip on a $15 job, strolled out the door without a care in the world, i-phone in hand, off to their next narcissistic adventure.
Now all of that is going to change. This expose should result in a complete overhaul of the 3rd world sweat shop nail business here in the City. And with it prices will triple and quadruple as they should and many of these shops will be forced to close down due to lack of "demand".
In the end however, the only people that will really suffer will be the poor downtrodden nail shop workers who will find themselves now unemployed and out on the street.
Roseann (New York, NY)
A number of people have posted that they will no longer get their nails done at salons. Yes, you will save the lives of the women who work long hours and expose themselves to dangerous chemicals. But then what? What will they do for a living? How will they support themselves and their children? A real result of this article should be how we can help these people find a better way, or regulate this type of work in such a way that we can provide safety and decent pay.
Mark Shyres (Laguna Beach, CA)
Perhaps they should go work for the FDA. Obviously, the work there is less demanding and the standards less exact. But still, there is something there that smells much worse than anything in a nail salon.
br (midwest)
It is far, far better to be out of work than dead.

The clientele are, absolutely, to blame for this. They have put vanity (and money) above human rights and dignity. Inexcusable and disgusting.
AreYouSoLame (California)
There are many other jobs that people with few skills can do. Low-skilled job openings are all we have in our area. It's the educated folks who have trouble finding work.
SCA (NH)
Sorry--but theres no cure for stupid.

I grew up in an era and neighborhood where all the moms went to the beauty parlor every week. I didn't need a grad school education to know that the fumes from all those *beauty* products were dangerous. I doubt Ive had my nails polished with that garbage more than twice or three times in my life.

Its really criminal--I use that word with intent--that women are having their childrens nails done with these products.

We know that our government will not protect us from the venality of business. But the comments here--shocked, shocked that products reeking of chemical fumes might be dangerous--really leave me speechless.

Do we really need to be led by the--uh--hand--to common sense? Human nails weren't intended to be lacquered up like car bodies.

File and buff. That's all you need. Spend the money on rings, if you need elegant adornment for your hands.

As for the exploited foreign workers--there are plenty of personal-care services that can be rendered without the use of dangerous chemicals. These women will adapt to whatever the market wants.

But I don't expect my fellow American women to get any smarter than they are right now, considering that the upper crust is poisoning its own darling daughters from toddlerhood with this garbage.
Nuschler (Cambridge)
This is NOT stupidity. This is ignorance. Not understanding that these chemicals can cause such problems.

The people who painted radium dials on watches and ingested radioactive materials weren't "stupid." Long term radiation sickness wasn't understood.
Yoda (DC)
Nuschler,

you do realize that the smell in these establishments are quite noxious? What, exactly, does that imply? Health?
SCA (NH)
Nuschler: Weve come a long way from those days, and those radium dial girls weren't well educated. Toxins in our food, water and home products has been an issue in the public sphere since the 70s. Any woman capable of reading the NY Times could figure out for herself that nail salons are like swamps full of toxic sludge.
Tsultrim (CO)
The New York Times is to be commended for this article, and for putting it on the front page. Many women have become increasingly aware of the toxic chemicals, not just in nail products, but in makeup and hair products altogether. There are websites that rate the various products. But so many women are completely unaware.

Do women know that repeated applications of lipstick may expose them to levels of lead above safe limits daily? Our government allows lead in makeup, as well as other terribly toxic chemicals. Not in paint, but okay in lipstick. How is it that we will not listen to and embrace the knowledge other countries have about this problem? The science is clear.

We will need to change attitudes as well as laws and product content. I recall another article in the TImes about how women who wear more makeup are perceived as more professional, more compentent, and thus get better jobs and more pay.

In the U.S., money-making is more important than the lives of women and children. What are we thinking? Thank you, NYTimes for this series of articles.
A Reader (Detroit, MI)
Terrific article except for one thing: Ms. Nir did not share with us the names of the allegedly three and five-free polishes that were found to still contain these chemicals. Why? That is sloppy reporting in an otherwise excellent piece. I would like to know which brands failed the tests. Please provide your readers with this information.
hannah (west coast)
As another commenter, Barbara, pointed out:

"…..women can go to the website ewg.org/skindeep/ to search their cosmetic products for harmful chemicals contained in them."
Mark Shyres (Laguna Beach, CA)
Probably edited out due to fear of legal action by the cosmetic makers, or reduction in adverting revenue from cosmetic companies. There is a good deal of inference here, but not a lot of hard data. Remember that the cosmetic companies do not, as a rule, make the ingredients used in their products. They formulate the ingredients from suppliers (although some times the ingredient makers do own the brands themselves, the biggest being Henkel). Also, remember than most brand names of cosmetics are owned by a handful of companies. It is not unusual for one company to have more than 30 well known brands including upscale designer brands which are licensed out. Also know that the cosmetic "departments" in department stores are leased departments run and staffed, not my the department store, but by the cosmetic brand. Nothing worn with that, in fact, the service is most often better (if not more aggressive) there than anywhere else in the stores - perhaps with the exception of those departments where where sales staff is on commission, such as footwear and certain rtw departments. You can always tell the difference as soon as you walk in.
ling84 (California)
Lizzy Oh (New York)
This is excellent journalism. As someone who grew up in the Korean-American community, all the personal stories about friends' moms are rushing back. And yet, Korean immigrants are still more highly privileged than most of the ladies who work with them. I really hope something happens at least in the state level in New York. With the number of nail salons that are in the city, New York has to pay attention. These stories have remained under the rug because many of these workers don't speak proficient English, remain in their ethnic enclaves, and work long hours every day. It also doesn't help that there are many undocumented workers. So I thank the author for writing this piece and I hope instead of refusing to enter nail salons, like other commenters are suggesting, we all advocate for better work standards and support businesses who do employ them.
Katie (Texas)
This is terrible but how will these women make a living without nail salons?
Grace I (New York, NY)
What is so wrong with real nails that people subject themselves to toxic fumes and enable the exploitation of vulnerable segments of society? Sigh!

NY Times team: Please reach out to celebrities and ask everyone, especially A-listers, to stop by the manicam with "gasp!" NATURAL NAILS! during the next award season.
Yoda (DC)
"What is so wrong with real nails that people subject themselves to toxic fumes and enable the exploitation of vulnerable segments of society? Sigh!"

same sickness as the desire for Gucci handbags - status.
ACW (New Jersey)
'But if a lot of people knew the truth behind it, it wouldn’t happen. They wouldn’t go.'
I admire your optimistic faith in humanity, Ms. Colon. But the truth is, as long as it's happening to you instead of them, they won't care.
However, what the NYT will not confront is that by and large, this is one of the 'jobs Americans won't do' that are almost entirely done by immigrants, legal or otherwise (as the first article noted, 'many [manicurists] are in the country illegally'. So they won't or can't insist on decent working conditions, wages, etc. And if the illegal ones were all legalized tomorrow and had rights, as soon as the workers insisted on those rights, they'd be fired and replaced with a new influx of illegal workers who are too desperate to insist on their rights .... we are importing a serf class. (And the NYT is applauding this vicious spiral.)
ling84 (California)
I don't believe the NYT is applauding the existence of an overworked abused underpaid class of workers. Amnesty for illegal immigrants doesn't mean approving abuse of them - especially if legal status would empower them to go to the authorities.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
@ACW: you have it backwards. Surprising, as you are normally pretty smart. This is NOT a job "that white Americans won't do" -- they do it all the time. Most of the manicurists in mid-America and small towns and mid sized cities are white US citizens. They also get decent wages and tips; we pay $20 and up for a manicure here, plus tip.

What is different in NYC and other huge cities is a massive influx of immigrants. They are TAKING jobs that Americans can do and would do, and driving the wages down to third world levels. They can afford to too this, because they don't pay taxes or insurance....they work long hours....they live in fear of deportation....and they live 10 to a room in squatter's apartments.

Meanwhile, normal US workers simply cannot compete with an illegal charging $1.50 an hour when the minimum wage is $7.25 and higher. Americans would complain, get an attorney, report this to authorities. Illegals will not. So they get all the jobs.

Wealthy folks turn a blind eye, because they LOVE LOVE LOVE cheap mani-pedis and cheap illegal nannies and cheap illegal landscapers and so on -- they have no incentive to make the system fair. They work to keep illegals here! Otherwise they would have to pay market wages for these services.

When you scream about a $15 minimum wage, think about this. Such wages and massive illegal immigration or amnesty are incompatible.

The NYT supports this, ironically, because they NEED those illegals to come here, get amnesty and vote.
RWriter (Manhattan)
Unfortunately, we can not trust the FDA to protect us from harmful chemicals.
We must use common sense. And err on the side of caution.

I sit next to a printer that is occasionally used at my workplace. So, I bought an air-purifying machine to run for a couple of hours when the printer is used. 35 dollars. So I don't worry. Worry is bad for the health, too.
Wayne A. Spitzer (Faywood, NM)
"So, I bought an air-purifying machine".......And if the "air-purifying machine" works by generating ozone it is probably worse for your health than the chemicals from the printer.
RWriter (Manhattan)
This sounds a bit glib and selfish, and I didn't mean that: my heart goes out to these people who didn't know they couldn't trust their employers or the government.
grannychi (Grand Rapids, MI)
The FDA is bound by the rules our legislators-- elected by We The People-- put in place.
Elizabeth Bennett (Arizona)
It's just appalling that American women can be so indifferent to the dangerous working conditions, and the enslavement of the women working in nail salons. We need to pressure legislators to pass laws to protect these women.

Don't forget that Bush basically destroyed the efficiency of the FDA by firing most of the conscientious members and replacing them with industry sympathizers.
Yoda (DC)
"It's just appalling that American women can be so indifferent to the dangerous working conditions, and the enslavement of the women working in nail salons. We need to pressure legislators to pass laws to protect these women."

WOuld not a more reasonable solution be a less cavalier attitude on the part of the women who keep these establishments in business?
LSH (Sunrise)
So that a basic mani/pedi costs $100 instead of $10 in NYC? Talk about killing off an industry, although that could be a good thing. Best for health-oriented patrons to do their nails at home. Best for illegals to go home.
Kelley Trezise (Sierra Vista AZ)
"enslavement" really?
ss (NY and Europe)
I've had just a few manicures in my life due to my service as a bridesmaid, and I don't understand the appeal. Why have someone else do your nails? Clip them, file them, keep them clean - yourself. It's not exactly a burden. Why bother with polish? If you must, use the non-toxic stuff.

The articles in this series are horrifying. I hope the industry is cleaned up in every way possible. It's disgusting that it's legal to expose workers to these chemicals, and disturbing that people are ok with these circumstances and a lousy $30 a day being the entry into American Dream.

Shame on the manufacturers, shame on the salon owners and shame on the fools who feel entitled to "pamper" themselves with such cheap services.

And while I am at it, a pox on the relative who gave my kids multiple bottles of nail polish!
ACW (New Jersey)
'Clip them, file them, keep them clean - yourself.'

Some of the young female cashiers I see at the supermarket have such long, elaborate artificial claws that it's almost impossible for them to hit the register keys. They contort their fingers into the most astonishing arcs to hit the keys with their fingertips and not damage the expensive manicures. Considering what cashiers are paid, I'm damned if I know how they spend on these grotesque nail contraptions and still make ends meet.
There seems to be an ornamentation 'arms race' going on, much like the one indulged in with regard to tattoos and piercings, to see who can get the more outrageous rig. Nails (and pierces and tats) are reminiscent of the wigs worn in the court of Louis XIV which were in some cases almost as tall and heavy as the women wearing them, and which could have anything from flowers, feathers and jewels to small cages with live songbirds inside woven into them.
SHaronC (Park City)
You left out shame on the lobbyists and for the regulatory agencies that either bow to political pressure or just fail to do their jobs to protect the most vulnerable among us.
Concerned Citizen (Anywheresville)
ACW: it is exactly that -- an arms race -- as young women compete with each other for male attention, and to a degree, to make themselves feel unique and special.

It certainly has existed in other cultures and time periods -- the wigs of the French court, the foot binding of the Chinese and so on.

Styles come and go. The problem is probably if you cause actual harm to yourself in this manner -- warped nails, mutilated feet, ugly stretched out tattoos that require expensive procedures to remove -- if it is just a stupid hair style, you can grow it out!

I've seen some horrifying stuff though -- young people who have their TONGUES split surgically -- ear studs that stretch ears like Ubangi's, tattoos that are actually disfiguring and cover the face.

In comparison, fancy nails don't seem too awful. However, if you are a young single mother, living off a part-time McJob and food stamps, and you are WASTING $30 a week on such primping -- maybe selling your food stamps and depriving your kids, so you can feel fashionable -- then it IS causing considerable financial harm.
Angelino (Los Angeles, CA)
Amazing! Where have these people been? I started changing my route or crossing the street to avoid passing in front of a so-called nail salon after the first encounter with one of them.

And they exploded in numbers after the Southeast Asian immigrant women started coming to the US: I guess that coincides with end of of Vietnam war.
And they have become captive workers or owners of those establishments, and nobody has warned them about the powerful carcinogenic solvents they used in their trade.
Larry (Michigan)
With all of the fumes, particles in the air and the fact that the workers must wear mask to remain safe, is the area at all safe for customers. Can we expect to eventually contract these illnesses? Customers are there on the average of an hour without any protections and we go home with the deadly chemicals on our nails and feet.
ACW (New Jersey)
The volatile vapours are released when the stuff is being applied. It doesn't persist after it dries. Maybe if you have asthma or COPD, an hour a week in a nail salon will have deleterious effects, but nothing even close to the risk of working in there all day (and overtime), constantly applying and removing polish and working with friable polymers to mould the fake nails. No sweat - you're safe.
Nuschler (Cambridge)
I worked at Kaiser in Honolulu and we saw many manicurists with these problems.
I started getting manicures just to see the conditions. Even the expensive salons in Waikiki resort hotels were run like sweat shops. One manager woman or man who ordered these women around--usually Vietnamese, Cambodian and couldn't speak English. Many of these women had work visas...many didn't. We found a thriving slave trade in plantation workers from Samoa and Fiji, and Southeast Asian and Korean women in salons, massage parlors, and strip clubs-"exotic dancers." The sex trade was booming...and no one cared. These victims were powerless. Many were supporting children left back in Asia.
As an MD I learned enough of these languages to understand how they were ordered around. But you only needed to hear how the orders were barked out and see how the women were even shoved around....many cowered, barely looking up. In one shop I asked the manicurist why she didn't wear a mask or gloves. I mean I nearly choked with the fumes. Their hands were raw, red, exfoliated (skin coming off). "Costs too much money." The worker could only use ONE cotton ball per client so she ended up wiping off chemicals with her bare hands and wiping them on her forearms and clothes--which she then took home to her family.

I tried to talk with them...ask them about family, where they lived. Most clients aren't even aware of these women who care for them. They chat with other clients...never with the workers.
ling84 (California)
Kudos to you for your grassroots-level work!
Richard Scott (California)
It's good to hear that someone took the time to look into their lives. Seems like we haven't had a voice for the average working person like that since FDR. .
David (Portland)
I have always wondered how women could be so carless about using Acetone on their nails. It's pretty common knowledge that this is a very volatile solvent that can easily pass through the skin and get into the bloodstream, but I guess vanity trumps common sense.
Mary Askew (Springfield MA)
What passes for "common knowledge" depends a lot on the individual.
Barbara (Raleigh NC)
It is about time the chemicals in nail products and cosmetics be regulated for safety. While I won't hold my breath for that day to come, at minimum, women can go to the website ewg.org/skindeep/ to search their cosmetic products for harmful chemicals contained in them. I have completely changed what products I used after checking the database. On a scale of 1 to 10 (7-10 being most harmful) my shampoo was an 8-yikes!!!
Maria (Melbourne, Australia)
Thanks so much for sharing this website.
Sara Kaplan (Chappaqua)
Thank you, Barbara, for the ewg link. Very enlightening.
MGTopAgent (Philadelphia)
Salon owner where I go had brest cancer 18 months ago and just a month ago came down with AML (Acute myelogenous leukemia). She is awaiting a bone marrow transplant. I feel certain there is a link. In my previous career I ran a cancer research lab in pathology department in a medical school. The techs in the pathology department whose job it was to "fix" tissue samples used the same chemicals listed in this article - formaldehye, benzene, toluene, etc - strong organic chemicals. This was ALWAYS done under a hood with strong exhaust. I have ALWAYS WONDERED why manicurists and OSHA does not require hoods and strong venting and exhausts for nail salon workers. There is a lot of research- this is not news - that links organic solvents to all forms of cancer.
bluestar MD (NY)
Robin Roberts had the same story ( RW the television reporter) I do not think she ever worked in a nail salon. Let OSHA look into it in general, but let's not be hysterical over anecdotes
LSH (Sunrise)
My hairdresser of many years ended up having a liver transplant. She then sensibly changed careers.
Sage (California)
Notice the persistent problem in making things safer for workers and consumers in this country: "There was a bill to ban these chemicals, but the lobbyists came with gifts, etc. and the bill never passed." This is not economic democracy. Unless we get $$$$$ out of politics, we will continue to compromise the health and safety of workers and consumers:-((
Yoda (DC)
a real solution would be for the female clientele to stop visiting these establishments. They are the root and cause of the problem. This is what is needed. Will they or are they too interested in their own vanity? That is the question you need to ask.
AS (Hamilton, NJ)
I have happily gotten a manicure once a week for the past 15-16 years until this year when illness in my family caused me to relocate to a rural area for the past 5 months; in fact, I just came home last week. I abandoned manis during that time and as the weeks away from them turned into months I noticed how much better the skin on my fingers was gradually becoming. I had previously experienced extremely dry skin all around my nails and cuticles and constantly dealt with what I called "picky places," little edges that seemed to beg for clipping or, worse, picking or biting. I also saw that as the old, apparently chemically infused nails gradually grew out and were filed away, the new nail was stronger. I was surprised - I had just thought I had very dry skin. About a month ago, while still away from home, I realized that I probably should not go back to the salon once my life returned to normal. Reading these articles has confirmed that for me.
Helen Morgan (Ann Arbor)
You werent getting a very good manicure. I had two regular biweekly clients - one while i was a student, another after i graduated - whose nails grew thicker, longer, and naturally more shiny under my care. Both were of retirement age. Hot oil (cream) is the key, and careful filing of the nail edge.
AS (Hamilton, NJ)
Well, Helen, I wish you were in Central NJ!!
Paddy (Pleasanton, CA)
On the rare occassions that I got my nails done in the Bay Area, the manicurist would tell me that her profession caused abortions. It seems to be common knowledge in the business.

If found to be true, a ban of nail products in their current form is called for. Surely some of these products will ultimately find their way into the bloodstream of the wearers too. How far is the nail from the skin?
AM (CA)
Shame on you all these women customers! Please know that you are harming another human being by making yourself pretty.
Kate (New York)
Okay, shaming people isn't going to help. How about solutions? Most customers don't know that this is such a big problem, and the women who work in this field need the jobs, as language barriers and their circumstances prevent them from finding other positions. So, how about some alternatives rather than just trying to shame people?
JulieT (Bishop)
The real answer is to make the industry safe not just do away with it. That is where the real work is. That way you could have people with an income that are sacrificing their lives for it or their families lives. Reminds me of the work that needed to be done for industries such as coal miners etc. Its easy (cheap) to think it is as simple as shame. Roll up your sleeves and join those that are fighting the good fight!
Realworld (International)
AM: Got a thing against women huh?
swm (providence)
It's not worth it. Pretty colored nails are not something for which an entire class of working people should be getting seriously ill, or worse. Who, in good conscience, can walk into a shop and maintain the demand that people risk their health for something that could be done at home - or not done at all.
Kilroy (Jersey City NJ)
There is a parallel here to artists' supplies such as lead and chromium paints and solvents like turpentine. In the past decade or so, artists who in earlier times would have been held in thrall to the high quality of leaded paints and the traditional cleaning of brushes in turp, have recognized the harm the supplies have wrecked on their bodies and moved away from them.

It's insane that the cosmetics industry lobby has such a firm grip on the FDA.
ACW (New Jersey)
Also a parallel to the radium watch dials. Women who painted those luminescent dials a hundred years ago found they developed cancers of the jaw, mouth, tongue, etc at a very high rate, because they were in the habit of using their lips to make a point on the brush.
The Poet McTeagle (California)
Chemical Parkinson's will probably become an issue as well. The workers should be wearing cartridge respirators, like house painters. The paint industry has developed effecting ultra-low and no-VOC paints; cosmetic companies could do the same.
Chicago lawyer (Chicago, IL)
I have gotten my nails done a handful of times in the last 5 years When you walk into the salons in the middle of the day, the fumes come wafting at you as you walk in the door. Often the ventilation is poor. I often wondered how long it would take for these findings to come out. I know women who regularly get their nails done with that no-chip product and I worry for them, too.
Russ (Monticello, Florida)
Where are these products manufactured? Who provides and oversees the formulas? What is the health effect on the manufacturing workers?
Rose (New York)
I'm really angry to see the Times go after the nail salon industry so viciously. Just since the first part of the article was published, many city friends have told me salon owners worry the story will directly affect their business - that customers will stop going. Is that what the three part series wants? For these shops to close? For their employees to go on welfare? Sure seems that way to me.

I got taken to task for my comments yesterday but I still contend that owner-operated businesses are the cornerstone of NYC culture. Let the consumer decide what business stays and what goes. Not the New York Times.
Workerbee (NYC)
In order to make sound decisions, customers need to have all the information. The NYT series is finally providing that information. I'm sure that people are still going to continue patronizing these shops. Remember, wal-mart and other retail workers have been exploited for years...when the facts came to light, people were outraged but ultimately the cheap deals won.
s3rp3nts (Cleveland, OH)
The consumer *will* decide. The NYTimes cannot physically stop an individual from entering a nail salon, and providing information isn't "go[ing] after the nail salon industry so viciously."

It's ludicrous to think that we - consumers - didn't already have an inkling as to the dangers of nail salons. As many have already said, as soon as you open the door, sometimes before you even get there, the fumes have overtaken you. Working hours per day in that environment can't possibly be healthy.
Adriane (NH)
Having information about an industry is how a consumer decides what businesses stay and which go. If the only way they can stay in business is by hiding the conditions their employees work in, then yes, they should go out of business.

You're saying the NYTimes should feel bad because nail salons will now suffer from the consequences of their business practices?

I'm sure people would be happy to go if salons implemented the ventilation and basic safety precautions recommended by experts.
Charity Vergara (Miami, Florida)
I always figured there were intense chemicals in the air at the salon and couldn't wait to get out of there. Now I know what happens to those who need to stay inside there for 8-10 hours on end (maybe more?). The FDA is a joke.
grannychi (Grand Rapids, MI)
The FDA is controlled by our elected legislators-- get out and vote!
GMB (Atlanta)
The risks from chemical exposure would be greatly reduced if the salon employees could work a humane schedule instead of the 80+ hours demonstrated in the last article. Not to mention how unhealthy such long working hours are in and of themselves, no matter what kind of work you're doing.

These people need and are legally entitled to higher wages and fewer hours. If the industry as it exists today (at least in NYC) cannot meet those requirements, then the state should kill the current iteration so that it can be replaced with a better one.
georgiadem (Atlanta)
Along time ago I remember going into a nail salon and the noxious fumes would hit you in the face like a cloud, literally. I was there for a pedicure and was worried about breathing in that air for an hour. During the pedicure I asked them about sitting in there all day breathing in the air, her response, you get used to it. I still get pedicures but there is not that horrible smell when you walk in the door. How can OSHA not do an air quality study in these places? I seem to remember a nail table that had a vacuum type air system attached to suck in the air born particles during filing. Although more expensive, this should be mandatory and improved, as should gloves and face masks that stop the particles that do escape into the air.

Hospital workers are banned from wearing acrylic nails because studies showed them to be infection carriers to patients, especially in the ICUs. If patient's rights to not be infected led to studies and clinical evidence proving this, why are there no real non-biased studies for the nail workers health? Because it would negatively effect the profits owners and product companies. I am waiting for the class action law suits to come against the companies.
DJS (New York)
It’s absolutely unconscionable that our government allows ingredients such
as Dibutyl phthalate, Toluene,and Formaldehyde ,and every other ingredient that is known to be harmful cause serious health issues,as well as lesser health issues,to be included in cosmetics in this country,as well as in food packaging products and in any number of prescription medications that are banned in other countries.
Our government consistently caves to to lobbyists and special interest groups
which are driven only by their own profit margins, with utter disregard for human life.
Our legislators,and we, as the citizens of the United States,must do everything in our power to put and end to this.
These powerful special interest groups are profiting off the illness and deaths of Americans,whether from cancer due to carcinogens in nail polish, shrapnel exploding airbags,faulty ignition switches,and the like.
Our government is complicit in murder,or manslaughter at the very least, in exchange for industry dollars
While it is obviously the women who work in these salons who face the greatest health threat from toxic ingredients in nail polish and other products,I believe that believe the NYT is doing a disservice to clients of nail salons, which include pregnant women,and women who use these nail polishes and other poisonous beauty products at home.
Meela (Indio, CA)
"Our government consistently caves to to lobbyists and special interest groups
which are driven only by their own profit margins, with utter disregard for human life."
Your words - and the root of this problem and a multitude of others in this country. We say there should be something done about it. We say our legislators should pass laws. Sadly, the realization of just how unrepresentative our government has become is reflected in this series and so many other reports on how our people really work and live in the US in the 21st century. The lobbys rule.
bk (nyc)
I can't imagine how someone would read this excellent series and step foot into a nail salon ever again. Is nail polish worth human lives? Another mirror industry is the landscaping industry. Immigrant men work all day dousing lawns with toxic pesticides and breathing in exhaust fumes from leaf blowers. What is wrong with this world?
Lisa Evers (NYC)
..there's also shoe shiners, food delivery guys on bicycle, blue collar construction workers who fall to their deaths off of scaffolding or down elevator shafts, crop-pickers who toil all day. And our clothing. Do you know where all your clothing is made and under what conditions?
Yolanda (Brooklyn)
OK after the first article i thought i could still get manicures cuz my place in the city is run by Koreans. But after this one, i guess i am done.
Zelda Beck (St. Louis, MO)
This is news to me. Not that this is about me, the customer, but it does raise questions of what are the risks for wearing such products in the name of grooming?
Spike5 (Ft Myers, FL)
Millions of people fretting about the minuscule amount of danger from the chemicals in nail products, and virtually no one concerned about the technician's constant exposure to the toxic chemicals. Another example of how American corporations and American consumers only care abut the bottom line and never the welfare of anyone involved in manufacturing the products and delivering the services we rely on. Once again, our regulatory agencies function only to further the interests of big business.
Yoda (DC)
or the female clientele, quite disgracefully, could care less.
Lynn in DC (um, DC)
Sad. I didn't know the FDA had no jurisdiction over the cosmetics industry. You are hit with strong odors from the toxic chemicals in use when walking into any nail salon. Of course people know the chemicals are toxic and not good for human ingestion. If I were pregnant, I would not paint my own nails or go into a nail salon and I certainly wouldn't want to work in a salon while pregnant. Yes, women need to earn money but at what price to their health of the health of their fetus? I don't care how poor one's English is, another job can be found but no one can find a second life.
Nancy Duggan (Morristown, NJ)
"...another job can be found" specifically what job?
Bertrand Plastique (LA)
It's paint.
Timothy C (Queens, New York)
I often go for a back massage at a place that also does nails in Flushing. The massage therapist, while strong, constantly has runny eyes and a cough which she brushes off as allergies. I often wondered what she could be so allergic to that she has these symptoms year round.

Now I know. Now the question is, does she know what she's really doing to her lungs day in and day out? She may not be painting nails herself, but being in an enclosed room with them seems to be enough. What to do?
Bruce B. (New York. NY)
And with the increasing prevalence of these heinous and unnecessary salons in New York City, citizens who have absolutely no need for their services have to be exposed to the same toxic fumes as they walk past these salons. Until recently there was one in my neighborhood adjacent to a subway exit I frequently use. One could distinctly smell the fumes even ten feet from the salon's entrance. I would find myself getting off the sidewalk and dashing past the salon in the middle of the street to avoid inhaling this pollution even for a very brief moment, being of the firm belief that there is no acceptable level of toxic air. Why isn't pollution better regulated? Why aren't those poisonous shish kebab carts with their plumes of smoke shut down once and for all? Why aren't construction sites entirely sealed off? This city is pathetic.
Eye Opening (NY)
Yesterday, I wanted to know if there was a way to suss out exploitive salons from non-exploitive salons. However, today I think I don't need my nails painted anymore. The nail polish/manicurist industry is a nightmare on many fronts.
Nancy (New York)
Friday being manicure day for scores and scores of women in NYC...I wonder if anyone will even hesitate before paying sitting down to their $10 manicure. I suspect very, very few will change their behavior. It would be interesting to have some folks outside some of the busy nail salons interviewing patrons. Vanity before ethics as usual.
Sarah Carrier (Brooklyn, NY)
I think we need to seriously reconsider our notions of feminine beauty. To support this industry with this knowledge on hand is equivalent to wishing harm on others. How is that beautiful?
TB (Maryland)
Unfortunately this is not a surprise, I can walk by one of these nail shops and if the door is open the chemical haze coming out is quite potent. It's quite shameful that the industry resists regulation. That demonstrates a willful
lack of regard for the safety of the industries workers.

The proliferation of nail salons has also astonished me over the years, they
are ubiquitous here in Baltimore. Makes me wonder how all this disposable income is available for what is really frivolous self decoration.
Laura Hunt (here there and everywhere)
More shameful on the politicians who are paid by these lobbyists to look the other way.
Andrea Grenadier (Alexandria, VA)
These shameful industry groups may be saying that correlation isn't causality, but clearly, where's there's smoke -- or lacquer -- there's fire. Even if only a small percentage of salon workers are getting sick, attention must be paid: it isn't just one person affected, it extends to the health of families, and the ability to make a living without contracting sarcoidosis, cancer, or having children with developmental disabilities. The science seems to be clear, if only the industry leaders have the courage to change their formulas and have salons better-regulated. Granted, it may seem like a small gesture, but customers can help by bringing 3-free or 5-free to the salon with you; if you think your brand (and OPI is certainly ubiquitous at every salon) includes the chemicals, read the labels. The Sierra Club's list of toxin-free lacquers include Zoya, Suncoat, Sheswai, RGB, and LVX. This tragic story brings up a moral issue for me, and I'm sure it does for others: do I continue to support my local salon, knowing what we know about the industry, or do I stop, knowing that the cost of a manicure (along with a huge tip) helps to support a family? Thanks to The New York Times for this important series.
marian (Philadelphia)
This is helpful information. Thanks!
ceilidth (Boulder, CO)
Keep in mind that most places require the manicurist to turn over the tips--which are ostensibly "shared." And if you put the tip on your credit card, chances are slim that the manicurist will even see it.
Lynn Ochberg (Okemos, Michigan)
Thank you, NYTimes for sharing this data about the dangers of acrylic nail enhancement. Women need to know this.
Yoda (DC)
you mean it is not possible to know this already? Is not the noxious smell enough of a give away? What about the incredients on a label?
Lynn Ochberg (Okemos, Michigan)
Many young women just entering adolescence are not necessarily aware of nail and other cosmetic product dangers. The scent of some products is not repugnant to all people. Immigrants seeking employment in salons might also be unaware of the dangers the NYTimes has spotlighted. This is a public health matter and every public information medium is welcome.
Edward (Phila., PA)
One a day, 5 days per week, as a letter carrier for USPS, I delivered to a nail salon on my route. It seemed obvious to me that the environment in that shop was not a healthy one. The pungent odor from the chemicals being used was extreme from only a brief 30 second exposure.
SayNoToGMO (New England Countryside)
What a sickening business, but everywhere I look, I see painted fingernails, even on babies and toddlers.

I'm sure women think they look pretty when their nails are painted bright colors, but if only they would think of the consequences. It's not just the workers who suffer from these poisons. The customers and their offspring are absorbing the chemicals as well. When I see a pregnant woman with polished nails, I wonder if her baby will have any health effects.

I wonder if the popularity of nail polish ove the last two decades is associated with the shap rise in autism and breast cancer cases.
ACW (New Jersey)
Although the article establishes pretty clear evidence of a connexion regarding other birth defects and reproductive problems, I think the autism 'sharp rise' is illusory, due in part to 'diagnosis creep' - a child now called 'autistic' 50 years ago might have been labeled 'retarded', 'childhood schizophremic', or just 'stupid' or 'weird', and 500 years ago would have been 'possessed by demons' . Autism is defined by its symptoms, with unknown and probably multiple causes - it's analogous to 'headache' or 'coughing', rather than 'polio' or 'Down syndrome'.
I'm not saying these chemicals could never cause autism. But the 'autism epidemic' seems to be concentrated more in the middle- to affluent classes, those who are more likely to be customers than workers in these salons. That may just be that they're more likely to get their children evaluated by physicians who will label the child's problems as 'autism' rather than just, say, 'slow'. Field for study, I think - surely some ambitious researcher in the autism field could investigate.
Bianca (Rochester, New York)
The toxic chemicals in nail polish are volatile, so the danger is only during the application. That's why manufacturers are arguing the safety, because the average nail polish wearer changes it once a week. However if you are exposed to open bottles and drying polish 8 hours a day, 5-6 days a week, you are definitely putting yourself at risk.
I'm-for-tolerance (us)
The NRA, manicurists, everyone using computer equipment for hours on end, all the corporations where working hours never stop... As a society the US seems unable to summon any vestige of compassion or reasonable care for its citizens and workers.

"Science" is no more than something that any non-expert can say is hogwash, and their opinion is as valued as those of researchers and experts.
Catherine (New York, NY)
I would like more information on this. Is it just the acrylic nails causing these health problems? Because those would be easy to outlaw all together. Or is it also breathing in the fumes of regular nail polish?
Marlow (Washington, DC)
The article includes extensive information on this.
W84me (Armonk, NY)
I am heartsick over this -- and wish the government (or the private sector -- ? billionaire donor, anyone?) were able to provide more support staff to enforce the goings-on at these salons, and not only provide more care for these workers, but also more research into the dangers of this industry.

I live in a "privileged" community where many mothers take their young (3, 4, 5 year old) daughters to the salon weekly for a "manicure." They get their fingers and toes done regularly -- and something that no one has talked about but needs to, is the impact of acetone, formaldehyde, etc. on developing immune systems; the adrenal cortex, and liver. Children being exposed to these toxins on a frequent basis will be victims of chronic diseases in years to come.

Moms -- trim your own kids' nails. It's not that hard. And really? It's a bonding experience. They don't need nailpolish!
Yoda (DC)
"I am heartsick over this -- and wish the government (or the private sector -- ? billionaire donor, anyone?) were able to provide more support staff to enforce the goings-on at these salons, and not only provide more care for these workers, but also more research into the dangers of this industry."

how about women not patronizing these establishments? That would fix the problem. the female clientele needs to take responsibility.
Anna Kim (NYC)
How near-sighted. What do you think these manicurists would do if, as you are suggesting, the clientele stopped coming? (For full disclosure, I don't own slaves and have never had a manicure).

The real culprit are not the "privileged mothers". The culprit is the lack of education and economic opportunities OTHER than painting somebody's nails in an unventilated room.
Jenise (Albany, NY)
The point is not that it is unsafe for your children to apply nail polish. That is perfectly safe and to make it about that shifts the focus from those who are being poisoned, the salon workers. Who are handling it and breathing it in all day long, along with the acrylic and other harmful chemicals in fake nails. Bourgeois moms should refrain from bringing their daughters for mani-pedi however so as not to make them complicit in the poisoning of these women to satisfy their little vanities.
Native Manhattanite (New York)
This narrative should be the first step- eye catching, glossy and corfu; the information is not a surprise- but" the dusty rose walls" will not change the situation. Specific detail and citations, quantified and analyzed, will change the laws and attitudes of the lawmakers.
Please include follow up in greater detail to create a NYT level of investigative reporting.
Which cancer research, source, data, interpretation?
Data will contribute to stronger case to deal with the human experience described in this year long investigation. Address the other issues of evasions of tax, immigration and labor.
A simple solution- boycott all salons or better yet
invesitigate and report differences
Rate them! Evuluate salons on certain criteria-
That's what's missing in this descriptive subjective narrative.
ling84 (California)
The problem is, who's going to pay for these in-depth studies? This has been an idea of grassroots groups in California for at least a decade now, but the lobbyists for the beauty industry have made sure that the groups use their budgets on legal fees and not on funding actual studies.
margo (Atlanta)
I have never set foot in one of those nail salons -- just walking past the door and smelling the fumes wafting out, I knew I would worry for my health to sit and breathe that air for even 30 minutes. And I also just knew that it was toxic for the people who worked there. How could it not be?
Adriana (California)
This is terrible. I had no idea until today. I will no longer be getting my nails done and I may decide to avoid nail polish. I'm starting to wish I lived in the EU or Australia since we live in a country so controlled by corporations we allow chemicals, that have been proven to be dangerous, in our products.
Laura Hunt (here there and everywhere)
OPI brand polish I believe has no toluene and formaldahyde. Been using it for years.
Simi (Brooklyn)
Or, you could keep getting your nails done and make a point of telling the management to install proper ventilation and to provide masks and gloves. And lobby your fellow customers to tip well and to join you in whatever campaigns there may be to have real regulation of the nail salon industry.
AreYouSoLame (California)
If you were alert enough to think that you (or the salon worker) was being harmed by those noxious fumes, then you wouldn't have to WISH to live in a country where everything was regulated more stringently. You would have already made the choice not to frequent those establishments. You might at talked some sense into your friends too.
DO YOU REALLY NEED THE GOVERNMENT OR A NY TIMES ARTICLE TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO??? (sigh).
Am guessing this now needs to be added to the common core curriculum...because apparently people in the USA are not fit to think for themselves anymore. AUGH!
Laura Hunt (here there and everywhere)
The first thing you notice when you walk into any number of these shops is the smell. It hits you immediately. Those are fumes from the acrylic base they use on fake nails. And try taking those things off, you have to soak your hands for what seems like hours. That should be enough to keep you walking past. It's pure poison. And most times the ventilation in these places does not work properly either. Ladies do yourselves and your nails a favor, stay away.
ajweberman (Manhattan)
"We make her paint her face and dance" - Yoko Ono. We also make her paint her nails. Is it really worth it? Pass any nail salon and you can smell the noxious fumes. Customers are exposed to them but workers inhale them on a constant basis. Hope the NYT series sparks legislation.
ACW (New Jersey)
Yoko's rhetoric notwithstanding, no one makes you paint your face and dance. I haven't worn makeup since college - and even then, only a slight swipe of eyeshadow, which at the time I had to buy mail order in order to get stuff without animal ingredients and not tested on animals. (I didn't lack for male attention despite my bare face; often I got more than I wanted.) And at age 60 I have never had a manicure or pedicure.
No one 'makes' anyone partake of these products or services.
on the road (the emerald triangle)
Yoda, if women stopped patronizing these places, then what about the women working there? They would not have a job. They are paid a ridiculously low amount of money, but, still, it is enough to want to make them work there.

What about if this service, which people seem to want, was performed safely and recompensed fairly. Wouldn't that be a win win?
Bianca (Rochester, New York)
This is about the least shocking thing I've read today. In grad school I worked in an optics lab where the only chemicals we used with any frequency were acetone, isopropanol, methanol, and toluene. Most of them common chemicals in nail products. We were required to handle them in a fume hood, if only to pour a small amount into another bottle, as per their MSDS sheets and OSEH. Not to mention, we had HVAC. The last time I went to a nail salon, I felt dizzy and nauseated, and vowed to never go back. Expressed fear for the brain cells and general health of the ladies who worked in that environment on the regular. It's a shame that it has been nearly ten years and not much has changed.
Timmy (Providence, RI)
Excellent journalism. Thank you!
small business owner (texas)
Well, it was an interesting story, but I would have liked a few more details. Are regular nail polish as bad as acrylic nails for workers? I don't think so, but it would have been nice to see it addressed. Also, would better working conditions make a difference, such as a working ventilation system? If so, should OSHA or NY DOL be looking into it? The health problems are awful and no one should have to work around toXic chemicals in such a lackadaisical manner. When I worked at a Dental Clinic the regulations were very tight and we stuck to them. The thread of OSHA violations hung over everyone's head. Are there no regulations in NY? I don't get manicures, but I do my own nails. One reason is the cost, at least 3 times the price down here, but the other reason is I just don't like acrylic nails.
TenCato (Los Angeles)
Pulitzer prize material!
Ella (New York, NY)
I get my manicures in a place that does not do acrylic nails. I'm very happy that the workers there are spared the effects of these, at least.
japarfrey (Denver, Colorado)
I wonder how many thousands of deaths have resulted from close proximity to these products, none of which serve no particular health function at all. Another horrible example of the inequity in our society; an industry that doesn't care about the suffering and death of mostly (if not all) women working in these places.
Raj (Long Island, NY)
Thank you for this fine piece of journalism. This is exactly why we need The New York Times!

The difference in the lives of the service providers, and those getting serviced, could not be starker. And the tragedy here is that the serviced, the usually well-off people who can make such a great impact by merely lifting a finger or two, literally, choose to remain oblivious to the travails of the people who are providing them with such a personal service, or they choose to shake off their guilt, if any, with a larger tip.

I have never been inside any one of these shops, and never cared for they did, and how. However, after reading what I read, I will never be able to pass another one of them so indifferently.
Bianca (Rochester, New York)
Actually, if you have ever walked though a poor urban neighborhood, you would know that nail salons are ubiquitous. It's one of the few indulgences that low-income people seem to not be able to live without. That actually adds to the problem, since low cost mani-pedis usually lead to cheaper, more dangerous products, poor safety and environmental health, and sweatshop-like treatment of employees.
Native Manhattanite (New York)
Narrative is breezy and colorful and hits on the issues; but research and data must be followed up by a NYT science editor or done in collaboration with this reporter.
It is great to hear narratives but equally important to describe data and research in detail because the hard facts change laws!
And law and enforcement is needed in this industry.
It is not sifficently to say this one's son or that one's daughter is developmentally disabled and that is caused by the toxins. That is intetesting to the readers but not worthy of thorough investigative reporting.
Let's push for a scientific core in this investigation, perhaps developed by a collaboration of many NYT editors on science and industry and labor.
Colorful narratives probably will not influence change on the industry.
JMH (NYC)
I disagree. Powerful narratives have always changed helped change laws and minds. This series is far more likely to move customers and, then, lawmakers than a scientific report with no link to actual people and real life circumstances. Ever see a trial? They are all about stories. As I read this my mind immediately flashed to my own experiences in salons, and I saw the faces of women who worked there whom I have encountered over the years. Excellent work.
JMH (NYC)
I disagree. These powerful narratives are much more likely to change the minds of customers and, then, lawmakers than a scientific study unmoored from the stories of individual lives damaged and/or ruined. Have you ever seen a trial? They are all about stories. Humans beings appear hard wired for narrative. Excellent work.
JMH (NYC)
I disagree. These powerful narratives are much more likely to change the minds of customers and, then, lawmakers than a scientific study unmoored from the stories of individual lives damaged and/or ruined. Have you ever seen a trial? They are all about stories. Humans beings appear hard wired for narrative. Excellent work.
Martha (Mag)
Seems like the issue of workplace safety should be overseen by OSHA, but as far as the FDA, I don't think they would have any oversight in the ingredients of nail products. Just like in the chemical industry, these workers should have environmental protections like ventilation systems in the workplace. I cannot see any other way to make these products other than using solvents........how else would the paint work?

Also, are the toxins still present after the paint dries? What about painting kids fingernails, and they bite the polish off? Are these largely eliminated from the body? Once the toluene and other solvents have dried, there is no longer a threat from the vapor. Right?

A typical manicure is about $30.......I don't know if the nail salon people would make a whole lot of money if it were $60 to cover costs of meeting regulations. What I see in the future is a better product which goes on as a semi-solid, therefore it would not emit gases.
grannychi (Grand Rapids, MI)
It'll take our votes to elect legislators who will empower OSHA in this and similar situations.
RoseMarieDC (Washington DC)
All through the article a question comes to mind: Why are these poisonous products allowed in the market?
Marlow (Washington, DC)
Lobbying. Period.
Nuschler (Cambridge)
Why are they allowed? Who speaks for these women? They aren't going to be filing class action suits.

What state legislature or even our 114th congress even cares about these workers who live in the shadows?

Just read about the CHILDREN who harvest tobacco and sustain nicotine poisoning every day--nausea, vomiting, dizziness, burning eyes. Who has the power? The landowners.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/17/health/hrw-children-tobacco-workers-report/

Despite strict laws to protect young people from using tobacco products, children as young as 7 harvest the crop and often get nicotine poisoning in the process.

http://www.healthline.com/health-news/us-child-workers-sickened-by-tobac...

Minimum wage workers have no protections. And enforcement of child labor laws in agriculture is non-existent.

Rose Marie will you speak for them? Ask your legislator to go after these practices.
LostinEurope (Germany)
They are not poisonous. Despite the tone of the article, there is no fact based scientific proof that any of these products are dangerous ***If used as recommended by the manufacturer***. There are more dangerous products in every home!

The problem is that these salon owners are not providing the education or safety equipment to the workers. All salons should be equipped with air extraction/filtration equipment - but this is not a legal requirement, so few invest in this. Manicurists should wear gloves, again these are not provided.

The health problems come from overexposure - this means repeated sustained use without adequate protection. No salon customer can ever be at risk because visiting a salon every two weeks is not sufficient to become overexposed. But as we read in yesterdays article, many of these exploited workers are working 12 hour days, six day weeks with no safety equipment.

Nail polish has been on the market for 80 years. Since when did anyone hear of this being a health risk? There is no scientific basis for this conclusion.
Not Sure (central nj)
This is just so sad. First-world women and their ridiculous manicures and pedicures and the immigrant women who pay the price for such vanities. I don't even understand why nails need such attentions and decoration. They look perfectly fine in their natural state using just a nail clipper or emory board.
Maybe if the salons allowed their employees to wear face masks and gloves, customers would realize just how awful these chemicals are and learn to love the colorless, short nails they were born with.
small business owner (texas)
It seems to be part of the human condition to decorate things. I am interested in historical teXtiles and going back to the far, far past you will find decorations on clothing and people (in the form of tatoos). It's very interesting, isn't it?
Nuschler (Cambridge)
Once anyone starts using acrylic nails--glued onto underlying nails it is nearly impossible to go back to "natural" nails.

According to the Mayo Clinic the worst problem is the infection that can invade the nail bed and finger. It's a vicious cycle. Just one more ridiculous action to achieve some sort of artificial, unattainable "beauty."

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/expert-answers/...

Most Europeans think that our excessive plastic surgery is unthinkable. Cheek implants in addition to face lifts, injections into every wrinkle to achieve immortality--eternal youth. Weaves, exercising three hours a day to achieve bodies that look like "boys with breasts."

Teenagers are getting breast augmentations for their sweet sixteen birthdays.

In the era of "selfies" both women and men are getting complete "makeovers" including plastic surgery to look great in these self portraits.

As a woman MD I find it to be sheer madness. I don't even wear makeup...and I am sure that both of my male and female patients are VERY happy that I have short filed nails when I do my physical exams!
amycurzi (chicago)
I just don't understand why everyone seems to think the point of this article is to decide if women should wear nail polish. Many of us wear makeup or color our hair. In other parts of the world people paint their bodies or wear bones in their noses.
This is not about decorative preference.
It is about the chemicals in the products that are used and how bad they are for the people who use them everyday in their jobs.
This is a huge industry that supports millions of families. But that doesn't mean that our government should be sidestepping it's responsibility for making sure that the products are clear of harmful chemicals and that the work environments are safe.
Sort of the same way food and medications are checked out and restaurants and factories are inspected.
rgfrw (Sarasota, FL)
I've dropped my wife off many times at nails salons and I'm astonished at the overpowering smell of solvents in the room. Having some experience in the chemical industry I know that if a manufacturing facility exposed workers to that level of vapor OSHA would shut them down. And the problem could be fixed quite simply with a small exhaust above the customers hands.
Sat (Chapel Hill)
Exactly. When you work with the same chemicals in a modern laboratory, you never smell the solvents, because the fumes get vented away.
fast&furious (the new world)
Scandalous and evil. An industry allowed to prey on it's customers and the least advantaged of its workers.

It's not just nails. Many cosmetics, including cosmetic creams that "brighten" the skin or erase age spots have been tied to liver damage and failure. And no one knows what's in our hair coloring and perming products.

Time for the enormous 'beauty' industry to start telling their employees and clients the truth about their products. Nobody "needs" nail varnish, cosmetics or hair coloring. It's inexcusable for anyone to become sick or die in support of the
'beauty' industry.

If men were being victimized in these numbers, something would have been done long ago. Our society still views women as expendable.
Yoda (DC)
as far as I know women patronize these establishments. Yet you do not blame them for doing so but blame male bias. You need to put blame where it is due. If women stopped using these establishments the problem would dissapear. Yet they don't. Gender based hypocrisy at its best.
Concerned Reader (Boston)
fast&furious,

Your post is highly sexist in terms of blaming men for this. Women do this to please themselves. Men don't care about women's nails.
Seth (New York)
Yet somehow, male workplace injuries and fatalities greatly outnumber those suffered by women, because it's so normalized for men to do hazardous jobs. Ask the mostly male construction workers, miners, soldiers how expendable they are.

It's sad, because this post made excellent points until that one entitled, sexist, and classist sentence, which concluded it.
Marc A (New York)
When my wife polishes her nails the chemical odor that fills the room is suffocating. It is a crime that these products are legal. Cancer is no mystery, it is caused by repeated exposure to these types of chemicals. Think about it. We assault ourselves with toxic chemicals on an almost daily basis.