I agree with Ari Weitzner these pictures make you think as if photography was dead. They look taken casually with a smartphone. Also a wordy article to describe "nothingness".
The only risk taking is for the reader and the viewer.
3
While I won't go as far as the emperor-has-no-clothes commenter, I do think it's legitimate to ask: (1) If these items weren't part of the current Gagosian inventory of objets d'oligarchie, would we be reading about them here? (2) if this collection is in fact a “conversation,” what's its point? Is there anything we don't already know about the ambiguous relationship between photographs and the lived world?
4
This work is getting more attention then it deserves based on being at Gagosian. If you want something painterly, that also deals head-on with the commercial facade, you need to look further then Jeff Wall. John Lehr’s Island Position is up right now (I think at Kate Werble) and it does a much better job looking completely surreal and pushing this conversation further.
4
I got bad news. The emperor ain’t wearing any clothes. These photos are awful and have zero artistic value. Just awful.
12