With Early Israel Elections, Netanyahu Banks on Strengthening Support

Dec 24, 2018 · 72 comments
Thomas (Singapore)
Netanyahu is done for on the corruption charges and will not make it through the election. But now that he has loosened all breaks there is an increasing chance of Israel going to war in Syria and then Iran. After all, what is left to improve his standing but to become a war president? No one would vote for a corrupt politician but many would vote for a self styled war hero. This is the oldest recipe for any election in a tight spot, start an even bigger crisis to distract from your other crisis that threatens you on a personal level. What could possibly go wrong?
Wayne (Brooklyn, New York)
Sometimes a parliamentary system of government is great for getting rid of people like Trump. But it's bad when someone like Netanyahu is skilled in forming endless coalitions to remain in power in perpetuity. Isn't anyone else in Israel qualified to be prime minister? Looks like you got a corrupt leader who wants to hold on to power.
Quandry (LI,NY)
Netanyahu has had no problem, continually interfering in America's business. Netanyahu is Israel's Trump. So, there should be no problem interfering in Israel's business. Netanyahu is corrupt and needs to go. There has to be someone in Israel that can reasonably govern and replace Netanyahu. Netanyahu has riled up Israel's enemies more than they would have happened on their own, without him. Netanyahu needs to be retired and tried for his corruption. If Israel wants peace, it's time to give someone else a chance.
M. L. (California)
In each & every peace negotiaions between Israel & Palestinians - the only item which prevented from successful conclusion was PLO non-negotiable demand of right to return. That is Israel will agree to absorb & grant citizenship to 5.5m Palestinian refugees outside Gaza & WB - Thus overnight Pals there - all under Hamas rule. The obvious question one may ask. If PLO wants its own state - why it demands most of its citizens live in another country, with whom they share next to nothing? Here is the real reason for this. The region of Palestine consist of today's Jordan, Gaza, West Bank & Israel. Palestinian presence in each region: Jordan: 67% Gaza: 100% West Bank: 80% Israel: 18%. Once they become a majority in Israel - then, we will see Hamas use Israel's own democracy to destroy its democracy. One Man, One Vote, One time. - Combine all four entities into one "State of Palestine". Take over IDF (and perceived nuclear arsenal). Then immediately. - sign defense treaty with Mullahs in Iran. Last - Squeeze Jews out of their country. Am I making it up? He...ck NO!!. This is spelled out in PLO's own "Phased Plan" drafted in 1974" A 10 step plan to destroy Israel w/o a single bullet shot. Here: https://iris.org.il/plophase.htm
Neil (Texas)
I have been to Israel and very fond of the place and it's people. Thanks for a good report. But I am beginning to think there is something like democracy on steroids the world over. Innumerable elections - all the time - yet same folks and same results. A deadlick or a gridlock of possibilities or advances. In our country, the Founders were wise enough to specify elections every two years. So, we have fewer elections - and yes, deadlock, why even a shutdown - but we are still the world's number one. In Europe, Brexit is the poster child of this phenomenon. I spend my winters in Mumbai where I have arrived a month back. In India - forget steroids - elections are the only thing that matters. They have elections 365 days a year - and each is covered breathlessly by tv, newspapers and even in social gatherings - that is all Indians talk about. Campaigning here is only calling each other names and giving freebies where politicians out muscle each other with TV's, laptops and now handphones - given free. Here is something for UN to do. May be commission an international meet and discuss whether all these frequent elections are really good for all people all the time. Or put it another way - they are becoming government by the politicians, of the politicians and for the politicians. India wins hands down in this proposition.
Tal Barzilai (Pleasantville, NY)
This election could either make it or brake it for it Bibi depending on the results. If the people really feel that he is doing a bad job, they will vote against his party in big numbers and possibly against him when the election for him comes around. At least in Israel, elections are help on a regular basis compared to the Palestinian territories where elections almost don't even exist with their politicians serving for life on what are supposed to be political terms. As a matter of fact, the last time the Palestinians even had an election was over a decade ago. Maybe that's why it's hard to make peace with them especially when their government hardly ever changes despite how many Knesset members and PMs had came and gone with Israel. Overall, we will have to see what the April elections will bring for Israel and if it will be for better or worse. Nonetheless, Israel does hold elections on regular basis whereas that is a rarity for the Palestinians.
John Figliozzi (Halfmoon, NY)
Bibi - Trump in Israeli garb. Intellectually far more qualified but no less corrupt or venal.
alanore (or)
Don and Bibi, two peas in a nuclear pod. The envy that our orange one must feel about Bibi being his own defense minister! They are both totally corrupt, but I've read that Bibi has a genius IQ, so there are some major differences (like about 120 points). I wonder how Israel feels about Trump leaving Syria. Cannot be a good thing, as Iran gets stronger. The world awaits the next disaster from both these reckless "leaders".
M. L. (California)
@alanore Israel's outgoing IDF Chief of Staff (Izenkot) has opined that, the withdrawal of 2000 US personnel will not change much with IDF's overall all capabilities to keep pounding Iran's military forces in Iraq. The only sad part is the poor Kurds whom - both US & Israel have been supporting with their struggle against their Muslim counterparts.
Greg (Lyon France)
If the majority of Israeli voters support the leaders who have turned Israel into a rogue state, then we will have a state of rogues. This is good for no one.
Tal Barzilai (Pleasantville, NY)
@Greg What are getting at? Most Israelis want a PM that can stop the terrorism Hamas constantly places on them as well as one that can make peace. If they see that Bibi isn't doing a good job, he will be voted out on the next election otherwise he will stay as Israel is a democracy. For the record, I'm no fan of him, but his fate will be decided by the votes on whether he will stay or go. As for the Palestinians, I take it most of them are alright with a terrorist organization such as Hamas running their government, which is why they voted for them even if not by choice in some areas. Keep in mind that elections are hardly ever help in the Palestinian territories while some of their politicians consider themselves for life on what are supposed to 4 or 6 year terms.
Greg (Lyon France)
@Tal Barzilai Tal, here in France we are very proud of the resistance mounted during the Nazi occupation. Palestinians have every right to be proud of their own resistance. In fact the UN passed Resolution 3314 giving the Palestinians the right to resist the Israeli occupation, and to use any and all means at their disposal. The "terrorism" card no longer works.
Tal Barzilai (Pleasantville, NY)
@Greg First of all, the UN has hardly ever supported Israel. Then again, that's mainly because the majority of their members happen to be third world nations that are mostly authoritarian to start with. Also, nothing that Hamas does is a form of resistance but rather terrorism especially when it comes to killing civilians such as the recent ones who were killed at a mall parking lot or even waiting at a bus stop let alone throwing rocks and bombs at others. Most of who Hamas kills are nothing but innocent bystanders who had done nothing to them. A real resistance group actually goes after those they know are really the problem such as the military, but not civilians. If the founding fathers attacked civilians in their protests, then more would want the US to stay under British control in the claim that they won't be killing them at random. As a matter of fact, there were even attacks on Jews by Muslims in the Mid East on what's now Israel that go as far back as 1839, and that was long before Theodore Herzl even thought about having a Jewish state there. Overall, I find it both an irony and appalling when there are those who defend groups such as Hamas and even Hezbollah in that matter while condemning any other terrorist.
David G (Monroe NY)
Listen, I’m not a fan of Netanyahu either, but this article is looking through the wrong side of the glass. The primary issue is that the small ultra-religious parties have Bibi by the you-know-whats because they don’t want to serve in the army. The political scandal is a sideshow. But ultimately Trump has just made Netanyahu’s re-election probable, if not certain. By withdrawing suddenly from Syria, Trump had invited in Iran and Russia. The Israelis don’t want missiles raining down on them from the north, so they’ll elect Bibi, bribes or no bribes.
Assaf (Herzliya, Israel)
People abroad (especially in America) gets the Israeli politics wrong. In Israeli election the voters elect a party, and not a Prime Minister. The party leader that has the best changes to form a coalition is becoming the PM (usually head of the larger party). If Netanyahu will face charges his own party could replace him, because voters vote for the party and not for a candidate to PM. Also the Israeli public have lots of other issues to think about and vote on beside the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. People abroad thinks its the main issue of the election, it's not. You need two for Tango.
M. L. (California)
@Assaf Me-tsu-yan. Moreover, Israeli society is much more pragmatic & dynamic - where people are by far more opinionated then other democracies. With a population of 8.7m, there are no less then 14 political parties - ranging from atheists (A. Lieberman) all the way to ultra-Orthodox Jews (some dub them "the Penguins"). Unlike US system, the beauty of Israel's parliamentary system is that - through coalition, even minority parties have a voice in the system.
Marc (Chicago)
Any prospect for regional peace has always run contrary to Netanyahu's parochial political interests; perpetual war is his raison d'être.
Rosalie Lieberman (Chicago, IL)
@Marc That is false and inflammatory. I don't like Netanyahu personally, but your accusation is not where it's at. Is he afraid of a peace deal? Absolutely, for many reasons. 1. Does an unelected "leader" of the Palestinians really represent them? Of course not, and the majority don't want a deal, either, nor could Abbas, or whoever, sign for them. 2. What international guarantees does a peace deal come with? Do I hear a stony silence to that? You think President Trump is going to send one soldier to guard whatever borders are determined? You know the answer to that. 3. What does Israel do the day after, with the majority of Palestinians saying, the peace deal is a fraud, and the Americans saying, this is your problem from now on, not ours. The day after will be just like it is now-terrorism, glorification of it in the Palestinian press, and the refusal to accept any Israel as legitimate. Perpetual war isn't what Netanyahu wants, it's what he gets. Where is the decency to call out the Palestinians for their terrorism and payments to terrorists families?
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@Marc Palestinians leaders have become very wealthy. Arafat had a net worth of $1 billion, Abbas $100 million, Abu Marzouk $2-3 billion, Khaled Mashaal, $2.6 billion. It literally pays not to make peace.
bluestar22 (delaware)
@Marc Exactly!
J. von Hettlingen (Switzerland)
Netanyahu, despite corruption allegations, is still popular among ordinary Israelis, because he’s an opportunist and he knows how to portray himself as the only leader who could protect them. Hence, they don’t see anyone far and near, who would be able to replace him. His run for a fourth term as prime minister would go unchallenged, because he would resort to fearmongering to win votes, like he did in the past. Since Avigdor Lieberman’s departure, he hasn’t found a replacement, and has taken on the role of a defence minister, showing off how possible terrorist attacks by the Hezbollah had been thwarted by destroying tunnels that ran from Lebanon to Israel. Should elections be held in April, Netanyahu would no doubt capitalise on Trump’s withdrawal of US troops from Syria, depicting the danger of having Iran on Israel’s border. If he won, he could get away from a criminal indictment. And his voters would just be like Trump’s supporters – they don’t care about their leaders’ lack of moral character.
Eddie B. (Toronto)
Either I am too simple-minded or have the wrong impression of what a democratic government looks like. Israel has 34 political parties participating in its general elections; each with its own platform and a long list of promises to fulfill, if the Israeli electorate elects them as the government. The people line up and vote for these parties and divide the 120 seats in Knesset among them. Immediately after the election, the machination starts. All kind of pledges are made to smaller parties to join the larger parties to form a majority coalition. The result is: 1. The pledges made to smaller parties are primarily intended to satisfy political ambitions of their leaders and have nothing to do with promises made to the Israeli public; 2. No party can be held responsible to the promises they made to the public during the election, as they can blame other parties in the coalition for refusing to going along; 3. On important decisions, the whole country is often taken hostage by maneuvers of smaller parties, trying to extract concessions for the interest of a few individuals, who are typically patrons of these parties. I am still lost how that is "the rule of the people" and why Israel is viewed as a democracy, let alone the Middle East's "only democracy". If we contrive a way to measure accurately the extent to which different countries in Middle East reflect the wishes of their people, don't be surprised if the much maligned Turkey comes ahead of Israel.
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@Eddie B. Many countries that we consider democracies have parliamentary systems with many parties. Israel was ranked #26 by Global Democracy Rating http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/rank/democracy-ranking-2016/ Even Palestinians think that Israel is a democracy. “57% say democracy in Israel is good or very good” http://pcpsr.org/en/node/723
JW (New York)
So you're saying any country with a parliamentary system rather than a 2-party presidential one is not really a democratic country? How about Italy, for example? How about on the other hand a country in which only two parties monopolize the entire political process, basically preventing any candidate whose ideas are outside the box from every winning office unless they compromise their values to the blow-dried and freeze-dried platforms of the two ruling parties? Is that democratic?
M. L. (California)
@Eddie B. Yes, there are 34 parties during the elections - but only those with minimum 5 mandates (seats) are qualified as members of Knesset. Today there are "only" 14 parties in Knesset. I will take that over our system of election here in U.S. where a party with only 25% of voters - gets absolute control of all 3 branches of government.
Greg (Lyon France)
Why on earth would the people of Israel vote for a person now under multiple criminal investigations. Netanyahu and his wife have overtly violated public trust. Why on earth would the people of Israel vote for a person who repeatedly proposes measures that would remove human rights from a large segment of the population and proposes outright warfare against the neighbourhood? Lieberman may have been qualified in his earlier job as bouncer for a Russian night club, but is totally unsuitable to lead Israel forward. Why on earth would the people of Israel vote for a person that openly advocates violation of international law in the colonization of the State of Palestine? Bennett would be arrested under the terms of the Fourth Geneva Convention. No, Israeli voters need to protect the future of the State of Israel by electing a new leadership that re-establishes the original dream of a liberal democracy and makes the State of Israel a respected member of the world community of nations.
Tal Barzilai (Pleasantville, NY)
@Greg In all honesty, every politician has some criminal past to hide no matter where they live hence making none of them good according to your logic.
Greg (Lyon France)
@Tal Barzilai Tal I'm not too fond of any politicians any where , but really now, Israel does take the cake when it comes to leaders charged with criminal activity.
Cornelis (Rotterdam)
Unusually bad writing by the NYT. “...the fact he faces possible bribery charges...” is it truly a fact if he only possibly took bribes? And is he charged or might he possibly be charged? What is the fact and what is the possibility here?
Armand (Oakland)
@Cornelis the fact is that there is something that could drastically affect his reputation. This sentence suggests the possibility of scandal is enough to tarnish his image.
Frank Lopez (Yonkers, NY)
This is a small dose of good news.
Rosalie Lieberman (Chicago, IL)
Opening up any article on Israel brings on the irrelevant, and irreverent, anti-Israel remarks. I assure you that unless one of the anti-Israel but Arab members of the Knesset was suddenly elected PM, Israel will not/cannot change its stance to the Palestinians, which is all most of the commenters care about. Netanyahu is a strong personality, and dishonest when it suits him, but the strength is needed to deal with duplicitous leaders like Putin. Herzog never made it because he is way too mild mannered and soft spoken. BTW, Erdogan is no friend to Israel, and he is an outspoken anti-Semite. He has lots of good company, I suspect, among some commenters. Make him your hero.
Greg (Lyon France)
@Rosalie Lieberman There is no mention of legality and morality in your comments, two principles that most of us see as very important. I detest deception and dishonesty (Netanyahu and Trump). Don't you think it possible to have strength and honesty in the same body?
K. H. (Boston)
Netanyahu and the Likud Party are an extremist party who have admitted to abandoning American Jews because they are “too assimilated.”
Greg (Lyon France)
The world will be watching. The observers around the world will be anxious to see if the Israeli public supports or rejects far right Israeli government policies. If the world witnesses widespread Israeli public support for human rights abuse and violations of international law, then it won't be just the Netanyahu, Lieberman, Bennett extremists who the world shuns, it will be the entire nation.
George (Melbourne Australia)
@Greg Hi Greg - just like the USA has done by electing Mr Trump.
eve ben-levi (ny city)
@Greg "Human rights abuses and violations of international law" must finally be specified, instead of dangerously reciting the same tired grossly inaccurate slogans from 50 years of propaganda. When Arafat and his gang went to North Vietnam and Soviet Russia, Ho Chi Minh and Soviet leaders started the whole accumulating snowball of human rights jargon offences. The rest is history. Pathetic.
Greg (Lyon France)
@eve ben-levi All it takes would be for you to read the Fourth Geneva Convention. I think that would be specific enough.
Greg (Lyon France)
The Jewish community around the world is, like it or not, directly associated with the State of Israel. What Israel does reflects on all Jews. Is Israel elects another government coalition of far right extremists with policies that violate human rights and international law, then the world's Jewish community will feel the impact thru another surge of anti-semitism. It s important for the world's Jewish leaders to step forward with a strong rejection of the extremists in Israel and a strong backing of liberal democratic candidates who can lead Israel back into the world community of nations.
DH (Israel)
@Greg Nonsense. Do you really think that if a different government is elected anti-Semitism will cease? The anti-Semites will hate the next Israeli government and Israel, too.
Greg (Lyon France)
@DH No, I fear anti-semitism will always be there to contend with. But another radical Israel government will fan the flames. This we do not need. We don't need more. We need less.
B. Honest (Puyallup WA)
@DH While there may always be Anti-Semitism, Israel itself is Guilty Of and Does Not Require being Anti-Palestinian in order to exist. Being safely on your side of a stout border and shooting unarmed protesters on their own land, protesting being cut off from the rest of the World. Legally and Rightfully Protesting, and the state of Israel not only refuses to allow the people in the Gaza Strip access to progress, they are used as Live Target Practice by the "Defense Force". And after Israel shoots and kills over 100 of them, they decide to send, in (internationally dubious, legally) crude, unguided munitions rockets that 'might' cause property damage. And then jump on THAT as an excuse to use ultra-modern jets to precision-bomb pre-selected targets, for political value. Israel has become the nation of "Bu, Bu, Bu, They Hit US Back First!" And do not see how that relates to their actual meaning of Chutzpah. Poor Orphans Indeed! Wake Up Israel, throw out your tyrants and open your eyes to the wider world of the harm YOU do for the little safety You get, and how your present 'leadership' has led your ship of state to dangerous shoals that seek to destroy the very vessel itself, from the inside out due to Corruption, Greed and War-mongering. It is not the Palestinians that are Israel's real enemy, it is the crooks in control there that keep the war and terror going at all cost, to keep ALL the people scared, no matter WHO has to pay. You want to complain? Prove me wrong!
Sid Menon (Boston)
I find the fact that the attorney general or the justice department (in Israel, but in the US too) can be swayed to not enforce the law because an election would “send a strong message”, is indicative of a broken system. No one should be above the law! What is the point if laws if they aren’t enforced even when there is compelling evidence enough to bring charges? Indicting Bibi would send a strong message, and a conviction (if there is grounds for one) would set a strong precedent.
Brett B (Phoenix, AZ)
Grifter Bibi made a very bad “bet” on the Republicans and Trump Casino Of autocracy and kissing the hand of the Saudis. That rotten bet will likely have massive security implications for Israel and the Middle East in 2019. Israelis helped amplify the bet by embracing the nationalistic Bibi (again and again) who’s ego and taste for power has made Israel far less secure.
Observer of the Zeitgeist (Middle America)
Not to worry. Hamas or Hezbollah will set off a bunch of missiles in late March, or they'll be a series of terror attacks by the Arabs, and the far-right in Israel will get elected again. And who can blame Israeli voters? It happens every time.
Lawrence (Washington D.C,)
Are the PA and Hamas to hold free open, and monitored elections as well?
njglea (Seattle)
PLEASE, Good People of Israel, get Netanyahu out. He is one of the prime democracy destroyers in the world. He is working with Putin, The Con Don, Erdogan, Sisi and all the other supposed "strong" men to try to destroy governments around the world and start WW3. PLEASE give us a new year's gift that will last for many lifetimes - a return to relative peace through diplomacy. NOW, nearly twenty years into the new millennium, is the time for a more humane, diplomatic, peaceful, educated, inclusive world.
BLR (Pennsylvania )
@njglea. Hopefully the “Good People of Israel” won’t give a darn what you, safely and soundly sitting in Seattle, think.
Levon (Left Coast)
Perhaps not when they vote, no, but the annual aid package won’t be refused either, now will it?
0326 (Las Vegas)
@njglea Tell that to Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran.
George (Michigan)
"The hard-line defense minister, Avigdor Lieberman..." As distinct from the peace-loving Netanyahu? By the way, would the NY Times describe views analogous to Likud's as "conservative" if they were held by Polish or Hungarian politicians? Or by Vladimir Putin? Is the Alternative for Germany, always and correctly described as "far right," any more to the right than Likud?
Eddie B. (Toronto)
"The leaders of the parties in Israel’s governing coalition announced on Monday that they would dissolve Parliament and that the country would hold elections in early April." Is that mean Mr. Mueller's report will be coming out at the end of April? Many expect the report to reveal details of a joint effort by Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Israel to influence the 2016 presidential election on behalf of Mr. Trump (please see the articles listed below). Apparently, that effort has links with Russia through some Russian oligarchs close to Mr. Putin. It can potentially put Mr. Netanyahu in a very awkward position, considering the fact that the next US administration, with a good chance to be run Democrats, is committed to punish severely countries that have meddled in the 2016 presidential election. 1. New York Times article: "Trump Jr. and Other Aides Met With Gulf Emissary Offering Help to Win Election"; May 19, 2018. 2. New york times: "Saudis Close to Crown Prince Discussed Killing Other Enemies a Year Before Khashoggi’s Death"; Nov. 11, 2018.
ubique (NY)
“King Bibi” is the quintessential example of a slimy politician. The range of charges that he, and his lovely wife are facing, make Donald Trump’s corruption seem like amateur hour. Democracy? Try ‘totalitarian ethno-State’.
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@ubique Israel was ranked 30 out of 167 on The Economist's Democracy Index. That's better than Belgium, Greece, Cyprus & at least a dozen other European countries.
DH (Israel)
@ubique The charges that Bibi and his wife face are actually small time corruption, and don't come close to the level of corruption in the Trump administration. Try forgetting your hate for Israel for a few moments before making such silly posts.
Plato (Oakland CA )
@m1945 - Surely you mean the "Democracy for the Majority" index.
Mikeyz (Boston)
If, and when, Netanyahu is ousted, followed by his pal Donald, the world will be a better place.
Edward Blau (WI)
Israel is the tail that wags the US dog and the Ultra Orthodox are the tail that wags the Israeli tail.
Paul (Brooklyn)
It could go either way for Israel. Anytime a crisis occurs in history two of the leading outcomes are demagogues or statesmen. An example of this in America was Lincoln, the great emancipator statesman during the Civil War but also the demagogue Trump during our recent crisis. The Israeli people could elect the demagogue Netanyahu again and get pro active wars, land grabs, favorable kill ratios, torture, intl. condemnation or worse or a statesman that will not get down to the level of Israeli's Middle East adversaries.
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@Paul Israel will get intl. condemnation no matter what it does. The World is biased against Israel For example, the UN criticized only one country for its treatment of women. It was not Saudi Arabia where women were not allowed to drive. It was not Egypt or Iraq or Yemen where girls suffer from female genital mutilation. It was not Palestine or Jordan or Iran where women are subjected to honor killings. It was Israel – a country that has had a female prime minister & female fighter pilots. The 10 worst countries for human rights are: Syria, Sudan, DR Congo, Pakistan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Myanmar, Yemen & Nigeria. So why are there more UN Resolutions against Israel than against the 10 worst countries combined? There is no boycott of China even though China invaded Tibet & transferred millions of Chinese settlers into Tibet. There is no boycott of Turkey even though Turkey occupies part of Cyprus and Turkish settlers have moved into occupied Cyprus. There is no boycott of Morocco which occupies part of Western Sahara. Unlike China, Turkey and Morocco, the Israel's occupation began because Israel was attacked. Also, unlike China, Turkey and Morocco, Israel offered to end the occupation if Palestinians would sign a peace treaty.
Greg (Lyon France)
@m1945 "The World is biased against Israel". This is becoming very true. It is also very unfortunate! The world did not view Israel in the company of Syria, Sudan, DR Congo, Pakistan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Myanmar, Yemen and Nigeria. It once viewed Israel as a liberal democracy. Now it is seen becoming a fascist theocracy. It is this change that has created the bias.
Paul (Brooklyn)
@m1945 and Greg thank you for your replies. There is plenty of blame to go around on both sides. If one plays the I am pure and you are not game and I never did anything wrong you will embolden the extremes. The origins of this conflict between Jews, Arabs and Christians started when religion was introduced to the state by Abraham, Moses, and Moh. We can thank our founding fathers for creating it and Lincoln for saving it, that we did not do this and thus saved ourselves from the horror story going on in that area since the beginning of time. Save separating religion from state in that area, which will never be done because it makes too much sense, the next closest thing is to realize that Arab and Israelis are both semites and work on that. If not, we will be condemning the area to more wars or worse, nuclear annihilation for the next 3,000 yrs.
Look Ahead (WA)
Instead of the peace in the Middle East that Trump promised Jared would deliver, Israel faces escalating threats from Hezbollah, ISIS, Assad and Iran, because of his precipitous decision to withdraw US military support from the ISIS campaign without coordination with allies or even consultation with the Pentagon. Russia will certainly be looking for opportunities to exploit this situation.
Joshua Schwartz (Ramat-Gan, Israel)
The wild card is the new political party of General Benny Ganz. Some polls, as of 2 days ago before the announcement of elections gave him up to 16 mandates. Will he get that (assuming he actually runs)? Will he join up with Lapid in Yesh Atid (centrist, sort of)? or with Avi Gabbai in Mahane Zioni (formerly Labor, center to left)? According to these polls the Likkud still comes out on top. But do they have enough for a coalition? If they did not, Mr. Netanyahu would not have dissolved the Kenneset. Show time!
MIKEinNYC (NYC)
If I was Israeli, in negotiations with adversaries, I'd want a hard-nosed character like Netanyahu on my side.
Ecce Homo (Jackson Heights)
@MIKEinNYC The purpose of negotiations is to achieve compromise. Netanyahu isn't interested in compromising with Palestinians, only in defeating them. An Israeli interested in that would definitely want Netanyahu running things. Israelis who are interested in compromise with Palestinians, who believe that compromise is the only way to long-term, sustainable peace, want Netanyahu gone. politicsbyeccehomo.wordpress.com
Paul P. (Arlington)
@MIKEinNYC And since you're an American, did you applaud Netanyahu's crass and immoral meddling in OUR election? He is a danger and an obstacle to any hope for Peace.
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@Ecce Homo Palestinians need to compromise, too, if they want peace. But do they want peace? ‘son's death was "best day of my life," says Palestinian mother’ How can a mother who loves her son say that his death was the "best day of my life?" The explanation is that she believes that her son's becoming a martyr by dying while attacking Jews gives him instant access to Paradise & eternal happiness. People who believe as she does don't want peace. They want conflict because conflict provides an opportunity for martyrdom.
Fespaco (Haifa, Israel)
No matter what the results of this election, no serious effort will be made to achieve peace and end the occupation. Israeli politics is a sideshow, a long and seductive dance that leads to nowhere and accomplishes nothing. Even in the “peacenik ‘90s”, no serious effort was made by either party (Labour or Likud) to achieve a lasting, just peace. The Oslo Accords were nothing more than a way to foemalise and make permanent the occupation. But go ahead and get your hopes up for the upcoming elevations. Be my guest!
Fespaco (Haifa, Israel)
@Fespaco: “formalise” and “upcoming elections”. My apologies.
m1945 (Long Island, NY)
@Fespaco In 1947, the scholars at Al-Azhar University (The highest authority in Sunni Islam.) declared holy war to return Palestine to Islamic rule. Therefore, as long as most Palestinians are devout Muslims (85% of Palestinian Muslims want sharia law.) and as long as the Jewish State controls even one square inch of land, peace is impossible.
Gershwin (New York)
For real, substantive peace, you need a partner that truly wants peace. As long as the Palestinian Authority celebrates martyrdom, and Hamas teaches hatred and violence to their children, there is no partner.