‘Better Call Saul’ Season 4, Episode 2: Gus Fring Is a Management Genius

Aug 13, 2018 · 79 comments
shelly (oregon)
I was blown away by this episode. Here we have real insight into how Jimmy becomes Saul: He's so clever & scheming & lightning fast in his thinking. He sees all sides, sees what every player in the scenario wants & needs. He is the Consummate Salesman. Yet it seems that before the job interview he still somewhat doubted his skills. No longer. Persuasion-- exactly as in the courtroom. It's the contempt he has for his marks that is Jimmy's slippery slope however. He's been liberated from following his brother. He persuaded himself. Now he can shine as his own true wild animal-- a lawyer/salesman/criminal who does not need to punch anyone's time clock.
akp3 (Asheville, NC)
The internet capabilities that Jimmy used to research the Hummel figurine ... featuring online auctions and pictures ... didn't exist in 2002.
Wade (Toledo)
@akp3 Close tho VERY close..eBay existed or just about did..I had WEB TV very close to this time.
Chris (New Hampshire)
I’m not even sure 3D television was even a thing during the timeframe depicted here. An Easter Egg, I guess you could say.
Rick (Mi)
Are we ever going to get any real backstory on Gus? Remember when Don Hector referred to him disparagingly as "Big Generalisimo"? There was some speculation that he had been a general in Pinochet's Army in Chile. I would sure love to have that verified one way or another!
Langdon Hammer (Brooklyn)
I also find it hard to imagine Mike being up for stealing a Hummel, especially now that he has a well-paying job.
Allen Rebchook (Montana)
Interesting that the doctor Gus had examine Hector in the hospital (the same doctor who later saves Gus' life in Mexico with the plasmapheresis unit after the Great Tequila Poisoning) is named Barry Goodman. Any relationship to Saul?
Rick (Mi)
@Allen Rebchook No.
Chris Wise (Ottawa)
Kim’s passionate (but misguided) tear down of Howard should be remembered come Emmy season. Rhea Seahorn is incredibly at home in the role and really portrays a quiet, supportive, sometimes on the offensive partner.
Chris coles (Alameda California)
@Chris Wise, agreed. Kim and jimmy both have grudges to hold against Howard, not least that howard seems by all appearances to have been very lucky having been born into wealth, good looks, and every other entitlement. Howard strikes me as one of those people who has never known failure so that when it happens it’s quite a shock. On the other hand, Kim and Jimmy are hardened by by struggle and failure, and have learned they have to keep trying. When Howard informs Jimmy of his suspicion that Chuck killed himself, we see him in disarray, with admitted burden of guilt over it. Jimmy takes the news in stride and sticks this guilt back in him, gleefully. This is Jimmy’s revenge for Howard’s perfect life and the power Howard exercised over Jimmy at the firm. Is Kim’s over-the-top lecture a play for a settlement from Howard for Jimmy? We don’t know yet, but Kim has shown she’s capable of crossing the line, and certainly owes Howard no favors.
Neelie (Philadelphia, PA)
Yes, Gus is a genius......an evil genius. Loved that line "......get him a badge". 1-Kim gives Jimmy letter; he doesn't read it; destroys it probably with lit match 2-Howard does not respect Jimmy so it follows he would not consider his feelings. And lets not forget how cruel Howard was to Kim in the past. Also cruel to Jimmy (via Chuck's direction) re: his role at HHM 3-It did not delight Jimmy after hearing Howard's confessional; it was Jimmy realizing he'll never be able to fix t; make amends. So, his reaction was screw it, you win. It was the death of Jimmy in that moment. It was Saul offering them coffee. 4-Bavarian Boy has to have a back story; probably will explain Jimmy's fondness for the elderly. I don't think he was calling Mike. Loved your comment on showing 3D on TV - cause you're right...you can't.
Clint (Des Moines)
Pretty clear from this episode, with its contrived chemistry between Jimmy and Kim and Kim's passionate defense of Jimmy in her outburst with Howard (also very contrived, though well acted), that Kim ends up dying and that this is how/why Jimmy becomes Saul.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@Clint Kim ending up dying? Bite your tongue Clint! Do not tempt fate nor the writers.
Clint (Des Moines)
@Marge Keller You know I'm right though!
CitizenTM (NYC)
The season is fully written. She is joins Saul Goodman or they break up.
Charles E (Holden, MA)
Is it possible that Howard Hamlin of HHM is abused only because he is a rich Caucasian male? He seems to have gone from villain to generally a nice guy who means well, but Kim lays into him with a hellbent fervor. I don't get it. I don't get how I'm supposed to be sympathetic to Kim and Jimmy on this issue.
Charles E (Holden, MA)
@Charles E First Jimmy lets him marinate in his guilt by not disclosing his own role in Chuck's death. Then Kim lets him have it. Suffice it to say, not my favorite arc in this story so far.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@Charles E I'm sorry, but I have despised Chuck ever since I saw the episode where he deliberately withheld information from Jimmy that their dying Mom asked for him when he left the room and then allowed Jimmy to feel guilty, thinking she had died alone when he went to get some coffee. That's cold, cruel, intentional, and just plain mean. Chuck was always jealous and in competition with Jimmy since they were kids. I think Chuck deserved what he got in the end, albeit Jimmy gave the final and ultimate nudge with his "innocent concern" regarding Chuck's mental health state to the Insurance company.
Chris coles (Alameda California)
@Charles E, yes, yet again wealthy white men are abused, this time by a non-wealthy white man and a non-wealthy white woman! It would be a major step toward justice to elect even a few people like Howard to legislatures and vote in huge tax cuts to assuage their suffering. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/01/05/the-new-congre... https://qz.com/1190595/the-typical-us-congress-member-is-12-times-richer...
voltaire (montreal)
The last time a character's hair was as front and center as Kim Wexler's pony tail was Kim Novak's in Vertigo. Respect to Rhea Seehorn !!!
TC (NYC)
This is the first time we see Jimmy and Kim share a passionate kiss. I've never sensed any real chemistry between these two so the scene doesn't work for me. I also like that no PDAs further cement the character types (or, at least, the character types as they register with me): he's the guy who can't believe his luck in winning the smartest, hottest chick in the room; she's the (very loyal) girl with the icy exterior, whose occasionally raised eyebrow says a good deal about their (lack of) compatibility.
Clint (Des Moines)
@TC Bingo. I sense no chemistry. I have a feeling the writers are ginning up this relationship between Jimmy and Kim so that we ultimately understand how Jimmy becomes Saul - Kim dies. This would also help explain Kim's outburst with Hamblin. We are supposed to believe that she has fallen into protection mode over Jimmy and that this enhances their chemistry somehow. All feels so contrived.
richguy (t)
@Clint There's absolutely no chemistry between them. Jimmy seems totally asexual, to me. Jimmy isn't a university professor, but he's a very cerebral person. He seems to enjoy conning more than any gains he gets from his cons. He likes the difficulty of the game more than the spoils. He seems bit like a gambling addict, but for him it's tricking people (and not gambling). TC, are you suggesting that Jimmy feels like he doesn't want to push his luck by being too aggressive with Kim? That's a possibility. Maybe Jimmy is always in the mood to be intimate with Kim, but holds back, because he doesn't want to make Kim reconsider her decision. Kim seems receptive yet passive, as if she's always just waiting for Jimmy to make a move.
Rick (Mi)
Agree. I've always been totally baffled by their zero chemistry on the screen... if I was tuning into the show for the first time, I would assume they were brother and sister, or just best friends. Their relationship is weirdly devoid of any passion.
Red O. Greene (Albuquerque, NM)
Was it my imagination, or was some of Arturo's sickening last gasps almost note for note - for lack of a better description - identical to Luca Brasi's when Luca was garroted in "The Godfather"? In any event, welcome back to The Land of Enchantment, America. (And adios, Vincent Fuentes. Your remarkably sculpted beard and hair will be missed.)
Rick (Mi)
No, Luca Brasi was choking and gurgling. Arturo was gasping. TOTALLY different! ( I will miss his hair, however)
Rob Kantner (Mt. Pleasant, MI)
I have enjoyed these comments, all very thoughtful and illuminating. Last night I rewatched 401 and then watched 402. In both I was struck, and moved, by the behavior of Kim (the excellent Rhea Seahorn) toward Jimmy. She is a far better, stronger, and more supportive girlfriend than Jimmy probably deserves (though we have the benefit of knowing what he transforms into, and she does not, yet). In particular, she knows exactly how to deal with a grieving friend. She practices "ministry of being with." She sits there with him in silence. She doesn't issue banal bromides about death. She deftly intercedes to help him navigate his life during this terribly dark time. And then she flies to his defense in her attack on Howard--literally losing it, exploding, after having witnessed and obviously thought about Howard's conduct toward Jimmy and its implications. Even if her reasoning isn't 100% sound (and I don't think it is in every detail), she is 100% on Jimmy's side, passionately advocating for him, defending and protecting him. That makes her an amazing relationship partner. Jimmy is lucky to have her; sadly, it's not clear he realizes that.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@Rob Kantner GREAT comment Mr. Kantner. I've always liked the Kim character, but when she let Howard have it, I feel in love with the Kim character. I thought Rhea Seahorn's performance was out of sight and never realized how powerful and talented she was. I truly loved your summary of Kim's complex role in the series. That's a keeper!! Going forward, I will be seeing Kim in a different and more educated light due to your comment. Thank you so much for sharing.
Cynthia (New York)
I truly thought that we would see the end of Nacho in that parking lot last night. I actually covered my eyes and started whimpering. I didn't want to see him die. Then when I realized it was the other guy who was being brutally murdered, I said, "Oh. Okay. I can live with with that." {I am creeped out by my own dark side...}
Rob D (CN, NJ)
Besides, we know him from Breaking Bad, in the future!
Jerry M (Portland, OR)
@Rob D Help me out here. I still have yet to connect Nacho to Breaking Bad. Does he appear there? I have no recollection of him. I agree with Cynthia, I thought last night was his swan song. Glad I was wrong.
Langdon Hammer (Brooklyn)
@Jerry M He is only mentioned in BB, and we don't even know if the reference is actually to him: when Walt and Jesse are in ski-masks threatening Saul, he says, 'It was Ignacio'. That's it.
rex (manhattan)
The best show on TV. The first episode of this season was mind blowing film making! This episode let Kim give it to Howard. I do disagree with your writer about Howard. He's been so nasty to Chuck, Jimmy, and Kim throughout the first seasons, did you forget about that? Gus and Mike's plot lines and fantastic, can't wait to see them intersect once and for all with Jimmy/Saul.
Clint (Des Moines)
@rex I agree with that. I think at least some of Kim's tirade against Howard had to do with the way she was treated by him and Jimmy's brother at the firm.
Diana (Hartford)
@Clint I agree that the treatment she received went into her reaction to Howard, but also that Kim is starting to be spooked by Jimmy's response to his brother's death and was defensive because of that. She was passionate with Jimmy and passionate in her defense of him because she senses that he is not really the person she thought he was. She's beginning to see, and to work to fool herself. It's a lose/lose for Kim.
Rick (Mi)
I agree, Howard was always far meaner to Kim then he was to Jimmy, who he admitted that he had always liked. As the executor to Chuck's estate, He can't be held responsible for the content of the will.
gmoke (Cambridge, MA)
Howard actually shows his decency in the way he responds to Kim's somewhat justifiable criticism and anger.
Langdon Hammer (Brooklyn)
@gmoke There was comment earlier (or on another thread, or something) that chimes with the point about Jimmy feeling contempt for his victims in the article, which feeds into a left-field theory about why Kim is nowhere to be seen in Breaking Bad. Kim has been conned by Jimmy and he feels contempt for her because of it. I know it seems crazy, for him to be the one to reject her, but somehow I can see it happening. We saw him reject a company that had just offered him a job. The tragic thing about Kim unloading on Howard is that she’s defending Jimmy when she doesn’t know the half of it. She thinks he’s so devastated to hear about Chuck’s suicide, but he’s feeling as guilty as hell because he knows his actions, spiteful and of no benefit to him, were the catalyst. Guilt can be a killer.
Flo (pacific northwest)
@Langdon Hammer Don't forget how Jimmy sabotaged his plush job at Davis and Main. That still bugs me to this day that he gave up that beautiful job --and he's just a character in a show, but it still bugs me. This was season 3. I think the transformation of unlawful Jimmy has been going on his whole life regardless of who is in his life. He is lucky to have Kim in his life, something really good, and like all other good things in his life, he tosses it aside. He even repurchased his wreck of a car back after his glory days of the Mercedes. He doesn't like nice.
The Chief from Cali (Port Hueneme Calif.)
This was a great episode and a preview of things to come. First, Jimmy is driven to with his good heart to help support Kim. His willingness to search for a job shows to Kim his strong drive Second Jimmy realizes his interview with Neff was either a lucky chance or realized grift. Pleas note the dialogue that stated “ I was going to throw those out in the dumpster” Lastly, Gus showing to his underlings his ability to ruthlessly kill, in front of them the power of a boss.
Matt Olson (San Francisco)
One probably inescapable handicap of prequels is that to use the same actors, in the same roles as in the original, is that we all do tend to age. The cousins, and Victor, too, look much older, when it should be the other way around. The cousins don't look nearly as menacing as they did in Breaking Bad.
Rob D (CN, NJ)
The aging of Mike is the toughest to swallow. oh well.
sergio (NYC)
Two things: 1. How exactly does Fring know what Nacho did to the old man? In Epiosde 1, we saw Victor watching Nacho throw something over the bridge into the river, but asking us to believe that Victor was somehow then able to retrieve the pills in a flowing river in the middle of the night is a little much. 2. As the previews for next week imply, I just don't find it credible that Mike would have any interest in Jimmy's idea to steal the figurine. Mike seems more concerned with larger issues and above such petty crime (while Jimmy doesn't). Thoughts?
Neelie (Philadelphia, PA)
@sergio The way Gus looked at Nacho when ambulance came for Hector suggested he strongly suspected Nacho did something to the RX. I think what Victor was able to see via his binoculars was Nacho throwing pills off the bridge. That confirmed it for Gus. I agree it's a stretch, but must have been good zoom lens. I agree about Mike. He already is getting mega bucks from 'security job', so no reason to involve himself in a theft. Maybe Jimmy was calling somebody else? He never said who he was calling.
Red O. Greene (Albuquerque, NM)
@Sergio I agree with #1. For Victor to conclude that Nacho was throwing Hector's Rx off the bridge is a stretch. And anyway, there's no way Victor could have retrieved those pills from the Rio at night . . . and probably not even during the day.
Alex (Boston, MA)
@sergio 1. My guess is Gus has been spying on the Salamanca's, and their close associates, for a long time. Gus thoroughly knows his enemy, he even keeps personal track of the medical health of nemesis. They just revealed that Gus has been tracking Nacho also, probably for far longer than Mike. Most likely they started tracking Mike because he was working for Nacho. If Gus was aware Mike was about to kill Hector, they must have also known why Mike started his conflict with Salamanca's. He would also know Nacho's wanted Hector dead because he muscled into Nacho's family business even thought Nacho's dad is morally opposed to it. He would have tracked Nacho to the meeting with the ridiculous pharmaceutical employee who sells the empty pill capsules to Nacho. Also, Gus could be bluffing, or he could just know what Nacho did to Tuco. All he said was "I know what you did," which is very vague, Nacho doesn't know exactly what Gus knows and Gus is probably okay with that because it makes Nacho think Gus knows all his sins. 2. It's not Mike, think he is hiring Huel because he is an extremely good pickpocket. That type of job is beneath Mike.
Rob (Long Island)
I cna't believe mention has not been made to the letter from Chuck for "jimmies eyes only" and how Kim "files" it away. That letter may the the straw that turns Jimmie into Saul and Kim's not mentioning it to Jimmie might be what splits them.
richguy (t)
I loved Gus' cheap shirt. Gus maintains his cover identity. If I were a Gus type kingpin, I'd wear Tom Ford and Isaia. In Goodfellas, if I recall, they get caught by the police when they start spending money.
The Chief from Cali (Port Hueneme Calif.)
@richguy As a former guy, I saw many wanna be’s who had to have the blingto show their power. I went to a school where there were sons and daughters of wealthy ranchers and land magnates. All were very cautious not to project their wealth. Many who are still my friends still maintain that thread of buying what you need not what you want to flash.
richguy (t)
@The Chief from Cali Your comment confuses me. I like Tom Ford shirts, because they are beautiful. I live in NYC to be around style and stylish people, because it thrills me. I live in downtown Manhattan. Most people here try to dress as well and as stylishly as possible. I work so that I can afford clothing I like. I love clothing, I often spend Sunday afternoon browsing Saks and Bergdorf. Here, in Manhattan, people enjoy projecting their wealth. It's part of Manhattan culture. I spend summer weekends in the Hamptons and winter weekends in Aspen and Vail. I think you and I have different experiences. I'd rather eat canned tuna and buy nice shirts than wear cheap shirts and eat fresh tuna, but I am unusually passionate about style and clothing.
Rick (Mi)
" a former guy"?.... What does that mean?
Charles E (Holden, MA)
I was thinking that I might be dense, not understanding the plot. But then I remembered how long it was between season 3 and the premiere of 4. I have been watching old episodes to catch up. In a way it's nice to have the show last so long, since we know that it has to end before the timeline of Breaking Bad starts. So drag it out. Please.
MConrad (Eugene, OR)
@Charles E Actually that is what makes this show so great is they don't have to make it end before Breaking Bad. Saul doesn't appear in B.Bad till mid season 2. It would be great if they referenced events from B. Bad tandomly and tied it together. Breaking Bads universe events took about 2 years start to finish and yes Saul played a big part but i think there could be enough of what Saul was doing outside of Breaking bad for more episodes. Heck, not sure the writers would want to but it could be feasible for the show to have a few episodes after the events of Breaking Bad. They have to tie in what we know already is AFTER the events of B. Bad when Saul is working at Cinnabon. CANT WAIT!
Marge Keller (Midwest)
Compared to last week, this episode took off and began to show the various cracks in the characters like Gus and Jimmy and Kim. At the risk of not being a spoiler, I will simply say that I never saw that ending coming. What an illuminating and terrifying side of Gus. And Kim, wow, I never knew she had it in her to call Howard out like that. Superb acting from Rhea Seehorn. But I thought the subtleties of Jimmy’s character transforming from “slippin’ Jimmy” to purely coning Jimmy since the death of Chuck was pretty revealing and awesome. He seemed to want to emulate Chuck in so many ways when he was alive, but the moment Chuck told him that he meant nothing to Jimmy, something died in Jimmy and we are now beginning to see a more deliberate and manipulative Jimmy emerge. I knew this season would be exciting and riveting, I just didn’t think it would start so soon with the second show.
Robert McEvily (The Bronx)
@Marge Keller Ms. Keller, yes indeed - BCS certainly makes a habit of making you say, "I never saw that ending coming." Mondays can't come fast enough!
The Chief from Cali (Port Hueneme Calif.)
@Marge Keller Thanks again for your great viewpoints! My wife and I like your commentary. Can hardly wait for episode 3! The Chief
Anonymously (CT)
On episode one, there was a quizzical reaction from Mike when he opened the Madrigal invoice. I wonder if there's something more going on. Why did Gus have to kill Arturo? To intimidate Nacho? Wouldn't his icy stare, along with "I know what you've done," be enough? He does slash loyal Victor's throat later, mostly to make a point How many years from now until the end of Breaking Bag? I haven't checked but I don't recall Mike's granddaughter looking much older than now. I wouldn't want Kim to be mad at me.
Joe (DeKalb IL)
@Anonymously Breaking Bad begins in 2008; BCS is currently set in 2003. The writers admit to dropping the ball on the age of the actress playing Mike granddaughter in BCS, as she should be much younger.
richguy (t)
@Anonymously Gus has always been too likeable. In BB, he was more likeable than WW. I think his assassination of Arturo was a revisionary move. Now, we know he's a ruthless killer. We can project that back into our experience with BB. Throughout BB, it often felt as if JP trusted Gus as much as he trusted WW, and it was not easy to say that WW was less criminal than Gus. Now, it is.
Charles E (Holden, MA)
@richguy I don't think that cutting the throat of Victor in BB is on the list of likeability assets.
Cynthia (New York)
Howard's revelation "broke" something in Jimmy -- another crack in the character who will ultimately become Saul. Jimmy is on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Some switch was flipped. He went from an almost catatonic state of mourning/guilt/sorrow/horror to Happy Whistler in the blink of an eye. He's not sleeping and he's operating on hyper-turbo-overdrive (sorry, don't know what else to call it so I made that up). That outburst on the job interview was the first of what will probably be more explosions.
Robert McEvily (The Bronx)
Anytime I see “directed by Michelle MacLaren,” I lean in, big-time. She’s always terrific, and has a real gift for the visceral scenes. (Another of her job-well-done credits is the heartbreaking S2 episode of The Walking Dead, when little Sophia emerged from Hershel’s barn as a walker.) Really gives me the shivers to think about how Gus would’ve killed Hector if given his vengeful druthers (absent Walt’s interference). Can you imagine? When Gus used murder to make a point, man oh man, the point was made loudly, clearly and unforgettably. What a nightmare for Nacho to watch Arturo die like that (as it was for Walt and Jesse - and even Mike - to witness Victor’s dreadful death). And what a fine reactive performance by Michael Mando as Nacho. You could feel his fear, hopelessness and sadness. I humbly suggest a bigger mystery involving Jaws 3-D is WHY they would show it on television, rather than how. (It was nominated for five ’83 Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture, Director, Supporting Actor and Screenplay.) Kim & Jimmy made the right call with White Heat.
Marge Keller (Midwest)
@Robert McEvily Mr. McEvily, I totally concur with your second paragraph in particular. I COULD feel the fear, hopelessness and sadness Michael Mando displayed. His face told the entire story with raw and deep emotion. You did a marvelous job recapping the entire closing scene. I literally held my breath during that scene. I did NOT see that one coming. All of that just to make a point, especially when Gus said "I own you". Chills and then some down my back. Another hallmark of this remarkable series.
The Chief from Cali (Port Hueneme Calif.)
@Marge Keller You have a great sense of insight! I do like your viewpoints. Gus had to show both his crew and Nacho that he was the boss. Sadly I believe that Nacho will be collateral damage in this series. After all his only mention in breaking bad is the the line that Jimmy says in the episode Better Call Saul.
Matt Olson (San Francisco)
@Robert McEvily Oh, if only Gus could see into the future, he wouldn't wait to devise some appropriately macabre exit for Hector. Gus winds up being a cross between a Holloween and a Grand Guignol spectre as a result of Hector's expertise with his bell. With Walter White pulling the strings, of course.
Randy (Denver)
You sure Jimmy called Mike about the "job"? I thought he called Buell...
Alex (Boston, MA)
@Randy I though so too. I re-watched it and you can hear Mike's answering machine
brando555 (WI)
@Randy Yep that'd make more sense. Buell is the sleight of hand master, plus I can't imagine Mike would be interested in that type of job at this point.
Lesley Patterson (Vancouver)
@Randy Huell, isn't it?
Nick (NYC)
To follow onto my other comment, I need to take a beat to acknowledge Rhea Seehorn. One of the things that interests me most about actors is vanity. Some actors are overtly, shameless vain; sometimes this works in their favor (a la Tom Cruise) and other times it is cringe-inducing (watch any Blake Lively performance, for example). Some actors are not vain in the slightest. One example: Jesse Plemons, a Breaking Bad alum, always looks like an absolute wreck on screen, usually some mix of balding, bad skin, overweight, etc. In real life he looks totally normal, but he doesn't get hung up on his image and we benefit from the performance. So to my point - I'm astonished to find that Rhea Seehorn is 46. You could tell me that she's 30 and I wouldn't think twice. She is an exceptionally beautiful woman. And in this season of BCS, she is covered in bruises and scars, wears a cast, and wears sweats most of the time. You can easily imagine another actor refusing to play ball. But she is all in. Appearance can an important part of characterization. Imagine how different her scenes in this episode could have played if she were not in such bad shape. We get to enjoy a much richer show because of her lack of vanity about her appearance.
richguy (t)
@Nick Shehorn is attractive, but she looks fortysomething to me. I like Jimmy, but he's not exactly a catch. Part of what makes Kim's relationship with him believable is that she's in her 40's. Feminists would be up in arms, if Jimmy were shacking up with a hot 31 yr old superstar lawyer, because it would seem like a male fantasy.
Nick (NYC)
Several thoughts after this ep. First, you'd think that a guy like Gus, who is driven by the memory of Salamanca murdering his compatriot right in front of him, would be reticent about murdering a guy's compatriot right in front of him. Obviously a power move, I get it. But ironic. Second I thought it would have been fun to see the Twins speak more - like, what if, when they are alone, they aren't so oppressively stoic? What if they were actually very sweet and gracious in the presence of Tio Hector and the new doctor? That would have added to our understanding of their character. A bit of humanity. Third, to respond to this: "Her accusation would seem far more plausible if the suicide theory actually put the zap on Jimmy’s head. On the contrary, it seemed to delight Jimmy." I think the characters are interpreting Jimmy's reaction as if the news/revelation that Chuck killed himself by fire was so horrible that Jimmy is basically in denial and has completely compartmentalized it away as a defense mechanism. We know that Jimmy knows he was more responsible (re: the insurance) than Howard knows, but that response could be true all the same. Jimmy definitely didn't expect or want Chuck to die.
Robert McEvily (The Bronx)
@Nick Re: your first point: Hector killed a man (Max) who was much more than a compatriot to Gus; Max was his true friend, the other brother in Los Pollos Hermanos (and possibly his lover, according to speculation). Just my opinion, but didn't seem to me that Nacho had any real affection for Arturo (and therefore would be unlikely to avenge Arturo's death). Re: your second point: LOVE that idea!
Mr. John (New Orleans, LA)
@Nick - To me, it's plausible that Howard started the fire that killed Chuck.
APS (Olympia WA)
Not the twins, but I thought they humanized the Salamanca work environment w/ Arturo talking to Ignacio about what he was planning, asking for support, and then at the end having his equivalent to 'that went well'.
Charles E (Holden, MA)
Maybe it's me, but I was angry throughout this episode. I had to remind myself several times that "this is just a show, they are following a script". First, Mike acts like a stubborn, foolish old man when he insists on continuing his disruptive acts at Madrigal, who pay him a nice paycheck to do what he is supposed to do. Then, we have Kim (Rhea Seehorn) angrily accusing Howard of mistreating poor Jimmy, when it was Jimmy who mistreated Howard by not letting him know that it was Jimmy himself who probably caused Chuck to suicide. Finally, we have a meeting in a warehouse late at night, no witnesses, very dangerous, and we have Nacho's friend acting arrogant and foolish and dying a painful death as a result. Who knows, he might have been killed anyway, but that was a dumb move. It kind of foreshadows Nacho's fate. We know he doesn't turn up in Breaking Bad. Such a bunch of idiotic moves. I know they have to create a drama, but really.
Cynthia (New York)
@Charles E - Madrigal isn't paying Mike for his "work" as a consultant. They're giving him his own money back, freshly laundered. He's going to all of the Madrigal locations because he's "working" there under his real name, and he wants to be able to prove he was showing up, in case anyone starts wondering how a former parking lot attendant who probably made not much more than minimum wage is now employed as a $10K per week consultant. :)
Charles E (Holden, MA)
@Cynthia I missed that part. Sometimes when things get too much into the weeds I tune out. If you see this, let me know what the laundered money was from. I will look it up anyway.
Kate (Miami)
@Charles E re "It kind of foreshadows Nacho's fate. We know he doesn't turn up in Breaking Bad." Isn't Nacho the drug dealer that Walter and Jesse kidnap and kill in Jesse's basement in the first season of BB?